12.12.2012 Views

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

African Journal of<br />

Agricultural Research<br />

Volume 7 Number 17 5 May, 2012<br />

ISSN 1991-637X


ABOUT AJAR<br />

The African Journal of Agricultural Research (AJAR) is published weekly (one volume per year) by <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Journals</strong>.<br />

African Journal of Agricultural Research (AJAR) is an open access journal that publishes high-quality solicited and<br />

unsolicited articles, in English, in all areas of agriculture including arid soil research and rehabilitation, agricultural<br />

genomics, stored products research, tree fruit production, pesticide science, post harvest biology and technology,<br />

seed science research, irrigation, agricultural engineering, water resources management, marine sciences,<br />

agronomy, animal science, physiology and morphology, aquaculture, crop science, dairy science, entomology, fish<br />

and fisheries, forestry, freshwater science, horticulture, poultry science, soil science, systematic biology, veterinary,<br />

virology, viticulture, weed biology, agricultural economics and agribusiness. All articles published in AJAR are peerreviewed.<br />

Submission of Manuscript<br />

Submit manuscripts as e-mail attachment to the Editorial Office at: ajarreview.acadjourn@gmail.com,<br />

ajarreview.acadjourn01@gmail.com, ajar.acadjourn@gmail.com. A manuscript number will be mailed to the<br />

corresponding author shortly after submission.<br />

For all other correspondence that cannot be sent by e-mail, please contact the editorial office (at<br />

ajarreview.acadjourn@gmail.com, ajarreview.acadjourn01@gmail.com, ajar.acadjourn@gmail.com).<br />

The African Journal of Agricultural Research will only accept manuscripts submitted as e-mail attachments.<br />

Please read the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript. The manuscript files should be given<br />

the last name of the first author.


Editors<br />

Prof. N.A. Amusa<br />

Editor, African Journal of Agricultural Research<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong>.<br />

Dr. Panagiota Florou-Paneri<br />

Laboratory of Nutrition,<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,<br />

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,<br />

Greece.<br />

Prof. Dr. Abdul Majeed<br />

Department of Botany, University of Gujrat,India,<br />

Director Horticulture,<br />

and landscaping.<br />

India.<br />

Prof. Suleyman TABAN<br />

Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,<br />

Faculty of Agriculture,<br />

Ankara University,<br />

06100 Ankara-TURKEY.<br />

Prof.Hyo Choi<br />

Graduate School<br />

Gangneung-Wonju National University<br />

Gangneung,<br />

Gangwondo 210-702,<br />

Korea.<br />

Dr. MATIYAR RAHAMAN KHAN<br />

AICRP (Nematode), Directorate of Research,<br />

Bidhan Chandra Krishi<br />

Viswavidyalaya, P.O. Kalyani, Nadia, PIN-741235,<br />

West Bengal.<br />

India.<br />

Prof. Hamid AIT-AMAR<br />

University of Science and Technology,<br />

Houari Bouemdiene, B.P. 32, 16111 EL-Alia, Algiers,<br />

Algeria.<br />

Prof. Sheikh Raisuddin<br />

Department of Medical Elementology and<br />

Toxicology,<br />

Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University)<br />

New Delhi,<br />

India.<br />

Prof. Ahmad Arzani<br />

Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding<br />

College of Agriculture<br />

Isfahan University of Technology<br />

Isfahan-84156,<br />

Iran.<br />

Dr. Bampidis Vasileios<br />

National Agricultural Research Foundation (NAGREF),<br />

Animal Research Institute 58100 Giannitsa,<br />

Greece.<br />

Dr. Zhang Yuanzhi<br />

Laboratory of Space Technology,<br />

University of Technology (HUT) Kilonkallio Espoo,<br />

Finland.<br />

Dr. Mboya E. Burudi<br />

International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)<br />

P.O. Box 30709 Nairobi 00100,<br />

Kenya.<br />

Dr. Andres Cibils<br />

Assistant Professor of Rangeland Science<br />

Dept. of Animal and Range Sciences<br />

Box 30003, MSC 3-I New Mexico State University Las<br />

Cruces,<br />

NM 88003 (USA).<br />

Dr. MAJID Sattari<br />

Rice Research Institute of Iran,<br />

Amol-Iran.<br />

Dr. Agricola Odoi<br />

University of Tennessee, TN.,<br />

USA.<br />

Prof. Horst Kaiser<br />

Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science<br />

Rhodes University, PO Box 94,<br />

South Africa.<br />

Prof. Xingkai Xu<br />

Institute of Atmospheric Physics,<br />

Chinese Academy of Sciences,<br />

Beijing 100029,<br />

China.<br />

Dr. Agele, Samuel Ohikhena<br />

Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management,<br />

Federal University of Technology<br />

PMB 704, Akure,<br />

Nigeria.<br />

Dr. E.M. Aregheore<br />

The University of the South Pacific,<br />

School of Agriculture and Food Technology<br />

Alafua Campus,<br />

Apia,<br />

SAMOA.


Editorial Board<br />

Dr. Bradley G Fritz<br />

Research Scientist,<br />

Environmental Technology Division,<br />

Battelle, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,<br />

902 Battelle Blvd., Richland,<br />

Washington,<br />

USA.<br />

Dr. Almut Gerhardt<br />

LimCo International,<br />

University of Tuebingen,<br />

Germany.<br />

Dr. Celin Acharya<br />

Dr. K.S.Krishnan Research Associate (KSKRA),<br />

Molecular Biology Division,<br />

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC),<br />

Trombay, Mumbai-85,<br />

India.<br />

Dr. Daizy R. Batish<br />

Department of Botany,<br />

Panjab University,<br />

Chandigarh,<br />

India.<br />

Dr. Seyed Mohammad Ali Razavi<br />

University of Ferdowsi,<br />

Department of Food Science and Technology,<br />

Mashhad,<br />

Iran.<br />

Dr. Yasemin Kavdir<br />

Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University,<br />

Department of Soil Sciences,<br />

Terzioglu Campus 17100<br />

Canakkale<br />

Turkey.<br />

Prof. Giovanni Dinelli<br />

Department of Agroenvironmental Science and<br />

Technology<br />

Viale Fanin 44 40100,<br />

Bologna<br />

Italy.<br />

Prof. Huanmin Zhou<br />

College of Biotechnology at Inner Mongolia<br />

Agricultural University,<br />

Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,<br />

No. 306# Zhao Wu Da Street,<br />

Hohhot 010018, P. R. China,<br />

China.<br />

Dr. Mohamed A. Dawoud<br />

Water Resources Department,<br />

Terrestrial Environment Research Centre,<br />

Environmental Research and Wildlife Development Agency<br />

(ERWDA),<br />

P. O. Box 45553,<br />

Abu Dhabi,<br />

United Arab Emirates.<br />

Dr. Phillip Retief Celliers<br />

Dept. Agriculture and Game Management,<br />

PO BOX 77000, NMMU,<br />

PE, 6031,<br />

South Africa.<br />

Dr. Rodolfo Ungerfeld<br />

Departamento de Fisiología,<br />

Facultad de Veterinaria,<br />

Lasplaces 1550, Montevideo 11600,<br />

Uruguay.<br />

Dr. Timothy Smith<br />

Stable Cottage, Cuttle Lane,<br />

Biddestone, Chippenham,<br />

Wiltshire, SN14 7DF.<br />

UK.<br />

Dr. E. Nicholas Odongo,<br />

27 Cole Road, Guelph,<br />

Ontario. N1G 4S3<br />

Canada.<br />

Dr. D. K. Singh<br />

Scientist Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Division,<br />

Central Institute of Agricultural Engineeinrg<br />

Bhopal- 462038, M.P.<br />

India.<br />

Prof. Hezhong Dong<br />

Professor of Agronomy,<br />

Cotton Research Center,<br />

Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences,<br />

Jinan 250100<br />

China.<br />

Dr. Ousmane Youm<br />

Assistant Director of Research & Leader,<br />

Integrated Rice Productions Systems Program<br />

Africa Rice Center (WARDA) 01BP 2031,<br />

Cotonou,<br />

Benin.


Electronic submission of manuscripts is strongly<br />

encouraged, provided that the text, tables, and figures are<br />

included in a single Microsoft Word file (preferably in Arial<br />

font).<br />

The cover letter should include the corresponding author's<br />

full address and telephone/fax numbers and should be in<br />

an e-mail message sent to the Editor, with the file, whose<br />

name should begin with the first author's surname, as an<br />

attachment.<br />

Article Types<br />

Three types of manuscripts may be submitted:<br />

Regular articles: These should describe new and carefully<br />

confirmed findings, and experimental procedures should<br />

be given in sufficient detail for others to verify the work.<br />

The length of a full paper should be the minimum required<br />

to describe and interpret the work clearly.<br />

Short Communications: A Short Communication is suitable<br />

for recording the results of complete small investigations<br />

or giving details of new models or hypotheses, innovative<br />

methods, techniques or apparatus. The style of main<br />

sections need not conform to that of full-length papers.<br />

Short communications are 2 to 4 printed pages (about 6 to<br />

12 manuscript pages) in length.<br />

Reviews: Submissions of reviews and perspectives covering<br />

topics of current interest are welcome and encouraged.<br />

Reviews should be concise and no longer than 4-6 printed<br />

pages (about 12 to 18 manuscript pages). Reviews are also<br />

peer-reviewed.<br />

Review Process<br />

Instructions for Author<br />

All manuscripts are reviewed by an editor and members of<br />

the Editorial Board or qualified outside reviewers. Authors<br />

cannot nominate reviewers. Only reviewers randomly<br />

selected from our database with specialization in the<br />

subject area will be contacted to evaluate the manuscripts.<br />

The process will be blind review.<br />

Decisions will be made as rapidly as possible, and the<br />

journal strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors as<br />

fast as possible. The editorial board will re-review<br />

manuscripts that are accepted pending revision. It is the<br />

goal of the AJAR to publish manuscripts within weeks after<br />

submission.<br />

Regular articles<br />

All portions of the manuscript must be typed doublespaced<br />

and all pages numbered starting from the title<br />

page.<br />

The Title should be a brief phrase describing the<br />

contents of the paper. The Title Page should include the<br />

authors' full names and affiliations, the name of the<br />

corresponding author along with phone, fax and E-mail<br />

information. Present addresses of authors should<br />

appear as a footnote.<br />

The Abstract should be informative and completely selfexplanatory,<br />

briefly present the topic, state the scope of<br />

the experiments, indicate significant data, and point out<br />

major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be<br />

100 to 200 words in length.. <strong>Complete</strong> sentences, active<br />

verbs, and the third person should be used, and the<br />

abstract should be written in the past tense. Standard<br />

nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should<br />

be avoided. No literature should be cited.<br />

Following the abstract, about 3 to 10 key words that will<br />

provide indexing references should be listed.<br />

A list of non-standard Abbreviations should be added.<br />

In general, non-standard abbreviations should be used<br />

only when the full term is very long and used often.<br />

Each abbreviation should be spelled out and introduced<br />

in parentheses the first time it is used in the text. Only<br />

recommended SI units should be used. Authors should<br />

use the solidus presentation (mg/ml). Standard<br />

abbreviations (such as ATP and DNA) need not be<br />

defined.<br />

The Introduction should provide a clear statement of<br />

the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and<br />

the proposed approach or solution. It should be<br />

understandable to colleagues from a broad range of<br />

scientific disciplines.<br />

Materials and methods should be complete enough<br />

to allow experiments to be reproduced. However, only<br />

truly new procedures should be described in detail;<br />

previously published procedures should be cited, and<br />

important modifications of published procedures should<br />

be mentioned briefly. Capitalize trade names and<br />

include the manufacturer's name and address.<br />

Subheadings should be used. Methods in general use<br />

need not be described in detail.


Results should be presented with clarity and precision.<br />

The results should be written in the past tense when<br />

describing findings in the authors' experiments.<br />

Previously published findings should be written in the<br />

present tense. Results should be explained, but largely<br />

without referring to the literature. Discussion,<br />

speculation and detailed interpretation of data should<br />

not be included in the Results but should be put into the<br />

Discussion section.<br />

The Discussion should interpret the findings in view of<br />

the results obtained in this and in past studies on this<br />

topic. State the conclusions in a few sentences at the end<br />

of the paper. The Results and Discussion sections can<br />

include subheadings, and when appropriate, both<br />

sections can be combined.<br />

The Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc<br />

should be brief.<br />

Tables should be kept to a minimum and be designed to<br />

be as simple as possible. Tables are to be typed doublespaced<br />

throughout, including headings and footnotes.<br />

Each table should be on a separate page, numbered<br />

consecutively in Arabic numerals and supplied with a<br />

heading and a legend. Tables should be self-explanatory<br />

without reference to the text. The details of the methods<br />

used in the experiments should preferably be described<br />

in the legend instead of in the text. The same data should<br />

not be presented in both table and graph form or<br />

repeated in the text.<br />

Figure legends should be typed in numerical order on a<br />

separate sheet. Graphics should be prepared using<br />

applications capable of generating high resolution GIF,<br />

TIFF, JPEG or Powerpoint before pasting in the Microsoft<br />

Word manuscript file. Tables should be prepared in<br />

Microsoft Word. Use Arabic numerals to designate<br />

figures and upper case letters for their parts (Figure 1).<br />

Begin each legend with a title and include sufficient<br />

description so that the figure is understandable without<br />

reading the text of the manuscript. Information given in<br />

legends should not be repeated in the text.<br />

References: In the text, a reference identified by means<br />

of an author‘s name should be followed by the date of<br />

the reference in parentheses. When there are more than<br />

two authors, only the first author‘s name should be<br />

mentioned, followed by ’et al‘. In the event that an<br />

author cited has had two or more works published during<br />

the same year, the reference, both in the text and in the<br />

reference list, should be identified by a lower case letter<br />

like ’a‘ and ’b‘ after the date to distinguish the works.<br />

Examples:<br />

Smith (2000), Steddy et al. (2003), (Kelebeni, 1983),<br />

(Singh and Chandra, 1992), (Chege, 1998; Gold, 1987a,b;<br />

Blake, 1993, 1995), (Kumasi et al., 2001)<br />

References should be listed at the end of the paper in<br />

alphabetical order. Articles in preparation or articles<br />

submitted for publication, unpublished observations,<br />

personal communications, etc. should not be included<br />

in the reference list but should only be mentioned in<br />

the article text (e.g., A. Kingori, University of Nairobi,<br />

Kenya, personal communication). Journal names are<br />

abbreviated according to Chemical Abstracts. Authors<br />

are fully responsible for the accuracy of the references.<br />

Examples:<br />

Li XQ, Tan A, Voegtline M, Bekele S, Chen CS, Aroian RV<br />

(2008). Expression of Cry5B protein from Bacillus<br />

thuringiensis in plant roots confers resistance to rootknot<br />

nematode. Biol. Control 47: 97-102.<br />

Pandey R, Kalra A (2003). Root knot disease of<br />

ashwagandha Withania somnifera and its ecofriendly<br />

cost effective management. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 33(2):<br />

240-245.<br />

Charnley AK (1992). Mechanisms of fungal<br />

pathogenesis in insects with particular reference to<br />

locusts. In: Lomer CJ, Prior C (eds) Biological Controls of<br />

Locusts and Grasshoppers: Proceedings of an<br />

international workshop held at Cotonou, Benin. Oxford:<br />

CAB International, pp. 181-190.<br />

Mundree SG, Farrant JM (2000). Some physiological<br />

and molecular insights into the mechanisms of<br />

desiccation tolerance in the resurrection plant<br />

Xerophyta viscasa Baker. In Cherry et al. (eds) Plant<br />

tolerance to abiotic stresses in Agriculture: Role of<br />

Genetic Engineering, Kluwer <strong>Academic</strong> Publishers,<br />

Netherlands, pp. 201-222.<br />

Short Communications<br />

Short Communications are limited to a maximum of<br />

two figures and one table. They should present a<br />

complete study that is more limited in scope than is<br />

found in full-length papers. The items of manuscript<br />

preparation listed above apply to Short<br />

Communications with the following differences: (1)<br />

Abstracts are limited to 100 words; (2) instead of a<br />

separate Materials and Methods section, experimental<br />

procedures may be incorporated into Figure Legends<br />

and Table footnotes; (3) Results and Discussion should<br />

be combined into a single section.<br />

Proofs and Reprints: Electronic proofs will be sent (email<br />

attachment) to the corresponding author as a PDF<br />

file. Page proofs are considered to be the final version<br />

of the manuscript. With the exception of typographical<br />

or minor clerical errors, no changes will be made in the<br />

manuscript at the proof stage.


Fees and Charges: Authors are required to pay a $600 handling fee. Publication of an article in the African Journal of<br />

Agricultural Research is not contingent upon the author's ability to pay the charges. Neither is acceptance to pay the<br />

handling fee a guarantee that the paper will be accepted for publication. Authors may still request (in advance) that<br />

the editorial office waive some of the handling fee under special circumstances.<br />

Copyright: © 2012, <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong>.<br />

All rights Reserved. In accessing this journal, you agree that you will access the contents for your own personal use<br />

but not for any commercial use. Any use and or copies of this Journal in whole or in part must include the customary<br />

bibliographic citation, including author attribution, date and article title.<br />

Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an<br />

abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if<br />

and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the<br />

publisher.<br />

Disclaimer of Warranties<br />

In no event shall <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong> be liable for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages of any<br />

kind arising out of or in connection with the use of the articles or other material derived from the AJAR, whether or<br />

not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability.<br />

This publication is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not<br />

limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.<br />

Descriptions of, or references to, products or publications does not imply endorsement of that product or publication.<br />

While every effort is made by <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong> to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statements<br />

appear in this publication, they wish to make it clear that the data and opinions appearing in the articles and<br />

advertisements herein are the responsibility of the contributor or advertiser concerned. <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong> makes no<br />

warranty of any kind, either express or implied, regarding the quality, accuracy, availability, or validity of the data or<br />

information in this publication or of any other publication to which it may be linked.


International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences<br />

African Journal of Agricultural Research<br />

Table of Contents: Volume 7 Number 17 5 May, 2012<br />

ences<br />

ARTICLES<br />

Review<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE<br />

Is there a relationship between floristic diversity and carbon stocks in<br />

Tropical vegetation in Mexico? 2584<br />

Jose Luis Martinez-Sanchez and Luisa Camara Cabrales<br />

SOIL SCIENCE<br />

Comparison of automated and manual landform delineation in semi<br />

detailed soil survey procedure 2592<br />

Kamran Moravej, Mostafa Karimian Eghbal, Norair Toomanian and<br />

Shahla Mahmoodi<br />

Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield, quality and some<br />

quantitative parameters of flue-cured tobacco cv. K326 2601<br />

Ali Reza Farrokh, Ibrahim Azizov, Atoosa Farrokh, Masoud Esfahani,<br />

Mehdi Ranjbar Choubeh and Masoud Kavoosi<br />

Vermicompost induced changes in growth and development of<br />

Lilium Asiatic hybrid var. Navona 2609<br />

Ali Reza Ladan Moghadam, Zahra Oraghi Ardebili and Fateme Saidi


Table of Contents: Volume 7 Number 17 5 May, 2012<br />

ences<br />

ARTICLES<br />

Contribution of soil organic carbon levels, different grazing and converted<br />

rangeland on aggregates size distribution in the rangelands of Kermanshah<br />

Province, Iran 2622<br />

Mohammad Gheitury, Mohammad Jafary, Hossein Azarnivand, Hossein<br />

Arzani, Seyed Akbar Javady and Mosayeb Heshmati<br />

ANIMAL SCIENCE<br />

Effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino polysaccharides<br />

supplementation on exercise tolerance and oxidative stress induced<br />

by exhaustive exercise in rats 2632<br />

Hongfang Wang, Changjun Li, Xiaolan Wu and Xiaojuan Lou<br />

Climate change and adaptation of small-scale cattle and sheep<br />

farmers 2639<br />

B. Mandleni and F.D. K. Anim<br />

POULTRY SCIENCE<br />

Village chicken production practices in the Amatola Basin of the<br />

Eastern Cape Province, South Africa 2647<br />

N. M. B. Nyoni and P. J. Masika<br />

AGRONOMY<br />

The relationship between agricultural intensification and sustainability<br />

in China 2653<br />

Hong-Wei Chen and Da-Fu Wu


Table of Contents: Volume 7 Number 17 5 May, 2012<br />

ences<br />

ARTICLES<br />

Water movement and retention in a mollic andosol mixed with raw mature<br />

chickpea residue 2664<br />

Isaiah I. C. Wakindiki and Morris O. Omondi<br />

PLANT BREEDING<br />

In vitro propagation of native Ornithogalum species in West<br />

Mediterrenean region of Turkey 2669<br />

Ozgul Karaguzel, Ayse Kaya, Beyza Biner and Koksal Aydinsakir<br />

Determination of associations between three morphological and two<br />

cytological traits of yams (Dioscorea spp.) using canonical correlation<br />

Analysis 2674<br />

P. E. Norman, P. Tongoona and P. E. Shanahan<br />

Distribution of nuclei and microfilaments during pollen germination in<br />

Populus tomentosa Carr. 2679<br />

Yuan Cao, Rui-Zhi Hao, Mei-Qin Liu, Xin-Min An and Yan-Ping Jing<br />

AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING<br />

Development of an automatic cutting system for harvesting oil palm<br />

fresh fruitbunch (FFB) 2683<br />

Hamed Shokripour, Wan Ishak Wan Ismail, Ramin Shokripour and Zahra<br />

Moezkarimi<br />

African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2584-2591, 5 May, 2012


Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

Table of Contents: Volume 7 Number 17 5 May, 2012<br />

ences<br />

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS<br />

ARTICLES<br />

Total factor productivity growth and convergence in Northern Thai<br />

agriculture 2689<br />

Sanzidur Rahman, Aree Wiboonpongse, Songsak Sriboonchitta and<br />

Kritsada Kanmanee<br />

CROP SCIENCE<br />

Dynamics of on-farm management of potato (Solanum tuberosum)<br />

cultivars in Central Kenya 2701<br />

C. Lung’aho, G. Chemining’wa, S. Shibairo and M. Hutchinson<br />

Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on maize hybrids under agro-<br />

environmental conditions of Faisalabad-Pakistan 2713<br />

Wajid NASIM, Ashfaq AHMAD, Tasneem KHALIQ, Aftab WAJID,<br />

Muhammad Farooq Hussain MUNIS, Hassan Javaid CHAUDHRY,<br />

Muhammad Mudassar Maqbool Shakeel AHMAD and Hafiz<br />

Mohkum HAMMAD


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2584-2591, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.599<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Is there a relationship between floristic diversity and<br />

carbon stocks in tropical vegetation in Mexico?<br />

Jose Luis Martinez-Sanchez* and Luisa Camara Cabrales<br />

División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. km 0.5 Carr. Villahermosa-<br />

Cardenas, Villahermosa, Tabasco, 86990, México.<br />

Accepted 21 December, 2011<br />

Tropical vegetation plays an important role in the terrestrial carbon stocks, and Mexico has a<br />

considerable amount of this vegetation that may store a large amount of carbon. However, an important<br />

variable of vegetation is its floristic diversity. Floristic diversity influences in a great extent the biomass<br />

of an ecosystem and hence carbon stocks. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is<br />

a relationship between floristic diversity and carbon stocks in the case of tropical vegetation in Mexico.<br />

Floristic species richness, Shannon´s index and above-ground biomass were estimated for eight<br />

localities with arboreal and herbaceous vegetation. The biomass in the humid and sub-humid tropical<br />

forests was estimated using two specific allometric formulas for trees. In the case of grassland, it was<br />

estimated by harvesting the vegetation. A positive relationship was observed by a straight line (r 2 =<br />

0.82, P = 0.001) and a significant relationship was observed in the inverse U polynomial model (r 2 = 0.84,<br />

P = 0.002) between species richness and carbon stocks. The diversity estimated by Shannon´s index<br />

also presented a significant relationship (r 2 = 0.65, P = 0.05). This proves what was expected and<br />

indicates that there is a relationship between floristic diversity and carbon stock in these ecosystems.<br />

The conservation of floristic diversity may represent an important factor in the mitigation of global<br />

warming, through the storage of large amounts of carbon.<br />

Key words: Biomass, carbon budget, diversity index, global warming, species richness, sub-humid forest,<br />

tropical rain forest.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Among terrestrial plant ecosystems, tropical systems are<br />

the most diverse, productive and, at the same time,<br />

vulnerable to land use change (Sala et al., 2000; Siche<br />

and Ortega, 2008). Nowadays, and worldwide, they play<br />

a main role in the reduction of atmospheric CO2<br />

concentrations through carbon sequestration (Brown et<br />

al., 1989).<br />

Mexico still has a considerable amount of tropical<br />

ecosystems that may function as carbon sinks. These<br />

ecosystems differ, among many other aspects, in their<br />

floristic diversity as a result of natural or anthropogenic<br />

conditions. In view of all the implications of the<br />

management and conservation of terrestrial plant<br />

ecosystems, it is important to determine the relationship<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: jose.martinez@ujat.mx.<br />

there is between floristic diversity and carbon stocks, in<br />

order to provide a useful tool for decision makers. The<br />

way in which the diversity of species affects the<br />

productivity of an ecosystem will in turn, affects the<br />

assets and services it can provide. This will be important<br />

to determine whether ecosystems in future, be less<br />

productive and effective as carbon sinks, should a<br />

progressive reduction in global biodiversity occur. The<br />

above-ground biomass of an ecosystem constitutes a<br />

basic indicator of its productivity (Pearson et al., 1989).<br />

The organic carbon in vegetation represents half its dry<br />

biomass (Pearson et al., 2005). The amount and<br />

variability of the above-ground biomass, and thus of the<br />

carbon that an arboreal ecosystem may store, respond to<br />

the diversity and relative abundance of the species<br />

(Tilman et al., 1996; Hector et al., 1999; Bunker et al.,<br />

2005). Despite many theoretical and experimental studies<br />

carried out to date, the relationship between species


diversity and ecosystem productivity continues to be one<br />

of the most controversial subjects in Ecology (Garnier et<br />

al., 1997; Guo and Berry, 1998; Mittelbach et al., 2001).<br />

In the case of plant communities, this relationship has<br />

been studied mostly for grassland and temperate forests.<br />

In the case of grassland, Tilman et al. (1996) and Hector<br />

et al. (1999) found that a reduction in biodiversity causes<br />

a reduction in productivity (biomass). In the case of<br />

temperate forests, An-ning et al. (2008) found a negative<br />

relationship between species richness and biomass for<br />

two communities of Quercus in China. Regarding to<br />

humid tropical forests, to date there are not yet<br />

documented case studies.<br />

The diversity-biomass relationship is affected by the<br />

environment (Guo and Berry, 1998). When environments<br />

are homogeneous, lineal relationships are present, and<br />

when environments are heterogeneous, inverted U-type<br />

curvilineal relationships occur. Lineal relationships may<br />

be positive or negative (Pianka, 1967; Silvertown, 1980).<br />

Guo and Berry (1998) found that the species richnessbiomass<br />

relationship in homogeneous environments<br />

characterised by shrubs was positive, negative or not<br />

related. Mittelbach et al. (2001) found positive<br />

relationships between species richness and biomass of<br />

vascular plants, however, the inverted U-type curvilineal<br />

relationship was more frequent (65%). Tropical humid<br />

forests include relatively homogeneous environments that<br />

may be compared, and in which a linear relationship<br />

between species diversity and biomass may be expected.<br />

It is a fact that at present it is necessary to conserve<br />

forest areas as carbon stocks, and it will always be<br />

important to conserve areas with the greatest possible<br />

diversity. But, what is the magnitude of the total carbon<br />

storage considering the actual diversity in the<br />

ecosystems that are available for this purpose?<br />

The questions of this study were: what is the<br />

relationship between the floristic diversity of tropical plant<br />

ecosystems and the carbon storage? The more diverse<br />

plant ecosystems store more carbon than the less<br />

diverse ecosystems?<br />

METHODS<br />

Eight localities were selected (Table 1). Plot replicates were<br />

randomly selected throughout in all localities. The above-ground<br />

biomass in the grasslands was harvested from ten 2 × 2 m subplots<br />

in each plot, dried at 70° C for 72 h, and the dry weight was<br />

estimated. The above-ground species in the localities of Rieles de<br />

San Jose and Veteranos de la Revolución were identified by the<br />

local people and verified with herbarium vouchers. The names of<br />

the species were obtained from Magaña (2006) and Ochoa-Gaona<br />

et al. (2008). The identification of the species in Yumka was carried<br />

out at the Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. For La<br />

Cuchilla and Los Tuxtlas, leaf samples were collected and identified<br />

with the aid of herbarium specimens. The non-identified species<br />

were considered as morpho-species.<br />

In the case of the arboreal vegetation, the above-ground biomass<br />

of each tree was calculated (>10 cm dap) for each plot with the<br />

formulas for humid (total annual rainfall >3,500 mm) and sub-humid<br />

Sanchez and Cabrales 2585<br />

(total annual rainfall 1,500 to 3,500 mm) forests, and the lowest<br />

value of mean error, according to Chave et al. (2005). The formulas<br />

used were, for the sub-humid tropical forest:<br />

ln(AGB)= -1.562 + 2.148 ln(D) + ln(D) 2 + ln(D) 3 + ln(q) (1)<br />

For the humid tropical forest:<br />

ln (AGB) = -1.302 + 1.98 ln (D) + 0.207(ln(D)) 2 – 0.0281(ln(D)) 3 +<br />

ln(q) (2)<br />

Where AGB = above ground biomass, D = diametre at breast<br />

height (cm) and q = wood density of 0.6 g/cm 3 .<br />

For the case of palms, lianas and Cecropia obtusifolia, the<br />

following formulas were used (Pearson et al., 2005):<br />

Palms: AGB = 6.666 + 12.826 / height [0.5(ln(height))] (3)<br />

Lianas: AGB = exp[0.12 + 0.9(log (Basal area at D))] (4)<br />

C. obtusifolia: AGB = 12.764 + 0.2588 [D(2.0515)] (5)<br />

The species richness (total number of species ha -1 ), Shannon´s<br />

diversity index (Krebs, 1998), and the above-ground biomass were<br />

obtained for each locality. Data were checked out for normality and<br />

homogeneity of variances. The regression models between<br />

diversity (species richness and diversity index) and above-ground<br />

biomass were obtained with the values of the seven localities.<br />

Simple and polynomial (inverse U) regressions were tested. The<br />

use of the polynomial regression was accordingly to the most<br />

approximate regression model to the inverse U line previously<br />

discussed. Statgraphics Plus 4.0 was used for the analyses.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The sub-humid tropical forest 1 presented a total of 20<br />

species per hectare, with an above-ground biomass of<br />

135 t/ha. The sub-humid tropical forest 2 and 3<br />

(regeneration site) presented a total of 41 and 30 species<br />

per hectare, with an above-ground biomass of 199.7 and<br />

79.4 t/ha respectively. The humid tropical forests<br />

presented a range from 62 to 88 tree species per hectare<br />

and a biomass from 198.8 to 261.4 t/ha. Shannon´s index<br />

for the sub-humid tropical forests ranged from 3.7 to 4.0,<br />

and for the humid tropical forests from 4.08 to 5.31 (Table<br />

2). The grasslands presented 12 and 10 herbaceous<br />

species per hectare (> 20% area coverage), with a<br />

biomass of 4.5 and 5.5 t/ha respectively. The dominant<br />

species were the grasses Brachiara decumbens and<br />

Paspalum notatum respectively.<br />

Biomass distribution amongst the families and<br />

species of the sites<br />

Species biomass of the grasslands could not be<br />

obtained. Overall dominant families in biomass in the<br />

arboreal vegetation of all the localities were Moraceae<br />

(four communities), Bombacaceae (two communities),<br />

Tiliaceae (two communities), Anacardiaceae and<br />

Caesalpinaceae (Table 3). These families dominated


2586 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Characteristics of the study sites in Mexico.<br />

Site Locality Vegetation type Location<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 1 Yumka, Villahermosa, Tab. 40-year old Sub-humid tropical forest<br />

17° 59’ - 18° 00’ N, 92°<br />

47’ - 92° 49’ W<br />

Annual average<br />

temperature (°C)<br />

Annual average<br />

rainfall (mm)<br />

Number (and size)<br />

of sampled plots<br />

26.9 2,159.3 3 (50 × 50 m) 0.75<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 2 La Cuchilla, Balancan, Tab. 20-year old Sub-humid tropical forest 17° 47’ N, 91º 13’ W 28.0 1,500.0 25 (10 × 10 m) 0.25<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 3 La Cuchilla, Balancan, Tab. Mature Sub-humid tropical forest 17° 47’ N, 91º 13’ W 28.0 1,500.0 25 (10 × 10 m) 0.25<br />

Humid tropical forest 1<br />

Humid tropical forest 2<br />

Rieles de San Jose, Tenosique,<br />

Tab.<br />

Veteranos de la Revolución,<br />

Tenosique, Tab.<br />

Mixture of mature forest and 10-20 yearold<br />

Humid tropical forest<br />

Mixture of mature forest and 10-20 yearold<br />

humid tropical forest<br />

Humid tropical forest 3 Los Tuxtlas, Ver. Mature Humid tropical forest<br />

Grassland 1 Yumka, Villahermosa, Tab. Grassland<br />

Grassland 2 Yumka, Villahermosa, Tab. Grassland<br />

17° 19’ 00’’ N, 91º 21’<br />

15’’ W<br />

17º 23’ 30’’ N, 91º 21’<br />

00’’ W,<br />

18° 34’ - 18° 36’ N, 95°<br />

04’ - 95° 09’ W<br />

17° 59’ - 18° 00’ N, 92°<br />

47’ - 92° 49’ W<br />

17° 59’ - 18° 00’ N, 92°<br />

47’ - 92° 49’ W<br />

Table 2. Values of diversity and above-ground biomass for six arboreal communities and two<br />

grasslands in southeastern Mexico.<br />

Site No. of species ha -1 Shannon index Biomass (t/ha)<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 1 27 4.00 135.0<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 2 30 3.7 79.39<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 3 41 3.9 199.7<br />

Humid tropical forest 1 66 4.55 198.8<br />

Humid tropical forest 2 62 4.08 196.85<br />

Humid tropical forest 3 88 5.31 261.4<br />

Grassland 1 12 4.5<br />

Grassland 2 10 5.5<br />

26.0 3,300.0 13 (30 × 30 m) 1.17<br />

26.0 3,300.0 13 (30 × 30 m) 1.17<br />

25.1 4,487 3 (50 × 50 m) 0.75<br />

Sampled<br />

area (ha)<br />

26.9 2,159.3 30 (2 × 2 m) 0.012<br />

26.9 2,159.3 30 (2 × 2 m) 0.012


almost with the same species elsewhere. In the<br />

sub-humid tropical forest 1, only two species<br />

accounted for more than 60% of the total<br />

biomass. In contrast, in the humid tropical forest 1<br />

for example, tree biomass spread over many<br />

species with small values. In all the communities<br />

biomass dominant species were not strictly tree<br />

density dominant species. Species with the<br />

highest tree densities had intermediate or low<br />

biomass values.<br />

The relationship between species richness<br />

(number) and biomass in these plant communities<br />

was significant with a positive linear relationship,<br />

and for the inverted U curve polynomial model<br />

(Figure 1a and b). The relationship for diversity<br />

and biomass obtained with Shannon´s index as<br />

an estimator of diversity may also be considered<br />

as significant (Figure 2).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

A possible minor baized could occur in the<br />

species and biomass values owing to the different<br />

plot size used throughout the localities in the<br />

present study. However this baized may be<br />

negligible. In the grassland 30 × 30 m plots were<br />

set up. This was because the herbs are small-size<br />

plants and large trees that require large sampling<br />

plots were almost absent. In the secondary<br />

forests, the baized could be greater owing to the<br />

relatively small sampling plots (10 × 10 m).<br />

However due to the larger number of plots<br />

sampled this could be sufficiently overcompensated<br />

(Gentry, 1990). Two grassland<br />

localities were considered sufficient owing to the<br />

low biomass variation of this vegetation type. A<br />

second biased in the study could be owing to the<br />

use of a mean value of wood density (0.6 g/cm 3 ,<br />

Pearson et al., 2005) to obtain the tree biomass.<br />

Since many particular species from these<br />

localities do not have a literature value yet and the<br />

reported mean value is obtained from a larger<br />

sample of species and worldwide accepted, it was<br />

decided to maintain it.<br />

Site biomass tended to concentrate in species<br />

of large trees. However, it seems that overall,<br />

biomass values among the vegetation types differ<br />

more because of species richness than because<br />

of species composition. Dominant species of the<br />

topical humid forests accounted for the highest<br />

community biomass values, but there were a large<br />

number of species with lower biomass values that<br />

overall, accounted more for the community total<br />

biomass than dominant species.<br />

A relationship was found between floristic<br />

diversity and biomass (carbon stocks) in the<br />

tropical plant communities. This relationship was<br />

positive and slightly more significant for the<br />

species richness than for the Shannon´s diversity<br />

index. It may be that a greater number of localities<br />

would also have provided a more significant result<br />

with the diversity index. These relationships were<br />

slightly more significant with the lineal regression<br />

model than with the inverted U quadratic model. A<br />

complete inverted U line was not observed, surely<br />

because a greater number of localities are<br />

required. As Guo and Berry (1998) indicated,<br />

ecosystems in homogeneous climates tend to<br />

present a lineal relationship between diversity and<br />

productivity. Tropical ecosystems have a<br />

homogeneous climate with relatively<br />

homogeneous temperature and rainfall values<br />

throughout the year.<br />

Given that carbon stocks is half of the biomass,<br />

the linear regression between biodiversity and<br />

biomass in the tropical ecosystems indicates that<br />

the conservation of biodiversity deserves the main<br />

importance, when considering a tropical<br />

ecosystem or a forest area with the purpose of<br />

carbon storage. This may contribute to the<br />

management of natural areas by simplifying<br />

decision making.<br />

In natural communities, the positive relationship<br />

Sanchez and Cabrales 2587<br />

between species diversity and productivity has<br />

been proved by many experiments, mainly for<br />

herbaceous species, aided by the advantage of a<br />

faster growth and easy manipulation (Wardle,<br />

1999; Schwartz et al., 2000; Diaz and Cabido,<br />

2001; Loreau et al., 2001; Schmid et al., 2002;<br />

Hooper et al., 2005; Spehn et al., 2005; Fargione<br />

et al., 2007). Positive relationships occur<br />

principally when there are new species that<br />

increase productivity (Mittelbach et al., 2001).<br />

A tendency may also be seen (P = 0.03, F =<br />

9.52) towards the commonly accepted inverse U<br />

relationship that is observed in most plant<br />

communities, probably because this type of<br />

relationship is more common in heterogeneous<br />

than in homogeneous environments (tropical<br />

areas) (Guo and Berry, 1998). In this case, the<br />

sub-humid tropical forest represents the greatest<br />

value of the slope by having, with only 20 and 41<br />

species (Yumka and La Cuchilla, Table 1), a<br />

slightly smaller or equal biomass than that of<br />

humid tropical forests, where the number of<br />

species is much greater. This also indicates the<br />

importance of conserving the presently reduced<br />

sub-humid tropical forests. The basic difference<br />

between these two types of tropical forests is the<br />

shorter dry season and greater rainfall in the<br />

humid tropical forest, compared with the subhumid<br />

tropical forest.<br />

It has been proposed that the non-observation<br />

of the peak in the inverted U relationship (straight<br />

line) in natural communities responds to the<br />

absence of a wide availability of resources (Marrs,<br />

1999; Mittelbach et al., 2001). In the case of<br />

natural communities, Gough et al. (2000)<br />

proposed that the inverted U relationship occurs<br />

after long ecological processes such as the<br />

colonization of new species, for which reason, in<br />

general, only the ascending part of the curve may<br />

be seen. However, Whittaker and Heegaard<br />

(2003) said that this widely accepted biomassdiversity<br />

relationship has been overestimated


2588 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 3. Biomass dominant species and families in the sites.<br />

Site Dominant families Dominant species Contribution of total biomass (%)<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 1<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 2<br />

Sub-humid tropical forest 3<br />

Humid tropical forest 1<br />

Humid tropical forest 2<br />

Humid tropical forest 3<br />

Grassland 1<br />

Grassland 2<br />

n.d. = not determined.<br />

Moraceae Brosimum alicastrum Sw. 41.0<br />

Caesalpinioidae Dialium guianense (Aubl.) Sandw. 20.7<br />

Bombacaceae Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. 21.0<br />

Combretaceae Bucida buceras L. 19.1<br />

Moraceae Ficus sp 16.5<br />

Combretaceae Bucida buceras 9.6<br />

Mimosoideae Acacia sp 8.0<br />

Anacardiaceae Spondias mombin L. 7.9<br />

Moraceae Brosimum alicastrum 6.8<br />

Bombacaceae Pseudobombax ellipticum (Kunth) Dugand 6.3<br />

Tiliaceae Trichospermum mexicanum (DC.) Baill. 5.4<br />

Tiliaceae Trichospermum mexicanum 16.2<br />

Moraceae Psuedolmedia oxyphyllaria Donn. Sm. 14.4<br />

Bombacaceae Pachira aquatica Aubl. 9.8<br />

Bombacaceae Pseudobombax ellipticum 8.0<br />

Moraceae Nectandra ambigens (S.F. Blake) C.K. Allen 18.8<br />

Anacardiaceae Spondias radlkoferi Donn. Sm. 11.2<br />

Poaceae<br />

Fabaceae Mimosa pigra<br />

Poaceae<br />

Bachiaria decumbens L.<br />

Axonopus compresus Sw.<br />

Cynodum dactylon (L.) Pers<br />

Eulosine indica<br />

Paspalum notatum Flugg<br />

Paspalum notatum Flugg<br />

Panicum 5aximum<br />

Andropogon bicornis L.<br />

Euphorbiacea Euphorbia harta<br />

Fabaceae Phaseolus latyroides<br />

n.d.<br />

n.d.


Biomass (t/ha)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Species number<br />

Figure 1a. Linear relationship of the number of species per hectare and<br />

above-ground biomass in two tropical grasslands and six tropical forests. r 2 =<br />

0.82, P = 0.001, F = 34.0. Model: Biomass = 0.675896 + 3.20147 * No. of<br />

species.<br />

Biomass (t/ha)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Species number<br />

Figure 1b. Polynomial relationship of the number of species per hectare and<br />

above-ground biomass in two tropical grasslands and six tropical forests. r 2 =<br />

0.84, P = 0.002, F = 25.5. Model: Biomass = -56.875 + 6.77745* No. of<br />

species - 0.03801 * No. of species ^ 2.<br />

by data analysis. Grime (1973) proposed that the<br />

descending part of the inverted U responds to<br />

environmental stress and a high inter-specific competition<br />

that decrease the productivity of a wide variety of<br />

species.<br />

The fact that the arboreal biomass increases<br />

progressively with an increase in the diversity of arboreal<br />

species has important practical implications, as for<br />

example: it is advisable to maintain an ecosystem with its<br />

Sanchez and Cabrales 2589<br />

greatest diversity to ensure a greater productivity and<br />

profit for the ecosystem. The more diverse an ecosystem,<br />

the more effective in providing important environmental<br />

services, as is the specific case of the carbon stocks. The<br />

relationship between greater ecosystem productivity and<br />

greater diversity has two possible explanations (Aarsen,<br />

1997; Huston, 1997; Tilman et al., 1996, 1997; Loreau,<br />

2000). One is “the sampling effect” in which a greater<br />

productivity responds to the greater probability of occur-


2590 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Biomass (t/ha)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

3.7 4 4.3 4.6 4.9 5.2 5.5<br />

Shannon index<br />

Figure 2. Linear relationship for diversity (Shannon Index) and aboveground<br />

biomass in tropical grassland and six tropical forests. r 2 = 0.65, P =<br />

0.05, F = 7.34. Model: Biomass = -187.69 + 86.032 * Shannon index.<br />

ence of one or several dominant species in the sampling<br />

units. The other is “the complimentarily of the niche” in<br />

which the sharing of resources by the different species<br />

results in a greater productivity in the community. The<br />

possibility of use of the same resource by more species<br />

(sharing) gives the possibility of a higher number of<br />

species in the community and then of biomass. If the<br />

polynomial regression (inverted U curve) is considered<br />

the one that best explains this relationship in arboreal<br />

communities, the greatest value of the positive slope<br />

(lower number of species and higher arboreal biomass)<br />

was recorded for the sub-humid tropical forest in Yumka.<br />

This may indicate that the sub-humid tropical forests<br />

have a relatively greater productivity with a lower number<br />

of species, in comparison with the humid tropical forests.<br />

This is of great importance in the conservation of tropical<br />

ecosystems also as, in the case of Mexico, the subhumid<br />

tropical forests cover at present the smallest area<br />

and has been strongly eradicated from their original<br />

distribution (Rzedowski, 1978). From the point of view of<br />

arboreal ecosystems as carbon stocks, the sub-humid<br />

tropical forests are of great importance.<br />

It may be concluded that, as the theory states, a<br />

relationship between diversity and productivity was<br />

recorded for the humid tropical vegetation of Mexico. This<br />

relationship was directly proportional (ascending straight<br />

line) as predicted for homogeneous environments. This<br />

means that carbon stocks in these highly productive<br />

terrestrial ecosystems will be more efficient when there is<br />

a greater diversity of arboreal species, and that the<br />

environmental service of carbon sequestration will be<br />

markedly favored by the preservation of a greater floristic<br />

diversity.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors thank M.C. Jesús Ascencio (UJAT) for the<br />

identification of the arboreal species of the Yumka park.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

An-ning S, Tian-Zhen J, Jiang-Ping G (2008). Relationship between<br />

species richness and biomass on environmental gradients in natural<br />

forest communities on Mt. Xiaolongshang, northwest China. For.<br />

Stud. China, 10: 212-219.<br />

Aarsen LW (1997). High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected<br />

by species diversity or productive species? Oikos, 80: 182–183.<br />

Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989). Biomass estimation methods<br />

for tropical forests with application to forest inventory data. For. Sci.,<br />

35: 881-902.<br />

Bunker DE, DeClerck F, Bradford RK, Colwell JC, Perfecto I, Phillips<br />

OL, Sankaran M, Naeem S (2005). Species Loss and Aboveground<br />

Carbon Storage in a Tropical Forest. Science, 310: 1029–1031.<br />

Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D,<br />

Folster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW,<br />

Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T (2005). Tree allometry and<br />

improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests.<br />

Oecologia, 145: 87–99.<br />

Diaz S, Cabido M (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity<br />

matters to ecosystem functioning. Trend. Ecol. Evol., 16: 646-655.<br />

Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, Lambers JHR, Clark C, Harpole WS,<br />

Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreaue M (2007). From selection to<br />

complementarily: shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity<br />

relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc. R. Soc. B.,<br />

274: 871-876.<br />

Garnier E, Navas M, Austin MP, Lilley JM, Gifford RM (1997). A<br />

problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the<br />

productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures? A.<br />

Oecol., 18: 657-670.<br />

Gentry AH (1990). Four Neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press,<br />

New Haven, Connecticut.<br />

Gough L, Osenberg CW, Gross KL, Collins SL (2000). Fertilization<br />

effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous


plant community. Oikos, 89: 428–439.<br />

Grime JP (1973). Control of species richness in herbaceous vegetation.<br />

J. Env. Manag., 1: 151-167.<br />

Guo Q, Berry WL (1998). Species richness and biomass: Dissection of<br />

the hump-shaped relationships. Ecology, 79: 2555-2559.<br />

Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M,<br />

Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R,<br />

Högberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Körner C, Leadley<br />

PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O'Donovan G, Otway SJ,<br />

Pereira JS, Prinz A, Read DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED,<br />

Siamantziouras ASD, Spehn EM, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward<br />

FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (1999). Plant diversity and productivity<br />

experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286: 1123-<br />

1126.Hooper DU, Chapin III FS, Ewel, JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P,<br />

Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B,<br />

Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005). Effects of<br />

biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current<br />

knowledge. Ecol. Monog., 75: 3-35.<br />

Huston MA (1997). Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: reevaluating<br />

the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 108:<br />

449–460.<br />

Krebs C (1998). Ecological methodology, 2nd. ed, Addison Wesley<br />

Longman, p. 581.<br />

Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A,<br />

Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA<br />

(2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge<br />

and future challenges. Science, 294: 804-808.<br />

Magaña MA (2006). Catalogo de nombres vulgares y cientificos de<br />

plantas de Tabasco. Universidad Juarez Autonoma de Tabasco,<br />

Mexico, p. 194.<br />

Marrs R (1999). Aboveground biomass and species diversity: assessing<br />

the effects of compartmentation and the setting of conservation<br />

targets. Oikos, 87: 541-548.<br />

Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL,<br />

Waide RB, Willig ML, Dodson SL, Gough L (2001). What is the<br />

observed relationship between species richness and productivity?<br />

Ecology, 82: 2381-2396.<br />

Ochoa-Gaona S, Perez-Hernandez I., Jimenez NC (2008). Descripcion<br />

de las especies de arboles mas comunes de la sierra de Tenosique,<br />

Tabasco, Mexico. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. Mexico, p. 137.<br />

Pearson T, Walker S, Brown S (2005). Source book for land use, land<br />

use-change and forestry projects. Winrock International. US.<br />

Pianka ER (1967). On lizard species diversity: North American flatland<br />

deserts. Ecology, 48: 333-351.<br />

Sanchez and Cabrales 2591<br />

Rzedowski J (1978). Vegetacion de Mexico. Limusa. Mexico.<br />

Sala OE, Chapin III FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R,<br />

Huber-Sanwald, E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R,<br />

Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker<br />

BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000). Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the<br />

Year 2100. Science, 287: 1770–1774.<br />

Schmid B, Roshi J, Schlapfer F (2002). Empirical evidence for<br />

biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. In: Kinzig AP,<br />

Pacala S, Tillman D (eds) The functional consequences of<br />

biodiversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 120–150.<br />

Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD (2000). Linking biodiversity<br />

to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology.<br />

Oecologia, 122: 297-305.<br />

Siche R, Ortega E (2008). Energy and value of the net primary<br />

production (NPP) above ground in natural areas. Ecol. Quest., 10:<br />

99-101.<br />

Silvertown J (1980). The dynamics of a grassland ecosystem: botanical<br />

equilibrium in the Park Grass Experiment. J. Appl. Ecol., 17: 495-504.<br />

Spehn EM, Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B,<br />

Bazeley-White E, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M,<br />

Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R,<br />

Högberg P, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Koricheva J, Leadley PW,<br />

Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O'Donovan G, Otway SJ, Palmborg<br />

C, Pereira JS, Pfisterer AB, Prinz A, Read DJ, Schulze ED,<br />

Siamantziouras ASD, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi<br />

S, Lawton JH (2005). Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations<br />

in European grasslands. Ecol. Monog., 75: 37-63.<br />

Tilman D, Woding D, Knops J (1996). Productivity and sustainability<br />

influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379:<br />

718–720.<br />

Tilman D, Lehman C Thomson KT (1997). Plant diversity and<br />

ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc. Nat. Ac.<br />

Sci., 94: 1857–1861.<br />

Wardle DA (1999). Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments<br />

investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? Oikos,<br />

87: 4 03-407.<br />

Whittaker RJ, Heegaard E (2003). What is the observed relationship<br />

between species richness and productivity? Comment. Ecol., 84:<br />

3384–3390.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2592-2600, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.728<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Comparison of automated and manual landform<br />

delineation in semi detailed soil survey procedure<br />

Kamran Moravej 1 , Mostafa Karimian Eghbal 1 *, Norair Toomanian 2 and Shahla Mahmoodi 3<br />

1 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.<br />

P.O. Box: 14115-111, Tehran, Iran.<br />

2 Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Station, Isfahan, Iran.<br />

3 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Soil and Water Engineering, Tehran University. Iran.<br />

Accepted 13 July, 2011<br />

ASTER DEM data was used to automate landform classification during soil survey in the Varamin area.<br />

For comparison, manual landform classification was done in the same area. Study area was located at<br />

South of Jajrood river watershed, Southeast of Tehran province (Iran). The main purpose of this study<br />

was to compare the effect of automated and manual landform classification methods in semi-detailed<br />

soil survey procedure. Eight geomorphometric parameters were extracted from DEM using the TAS and<br />

DiGem software. The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis elucidated that, the most effective of<br />

parameters were: analytical hill-shade, plan and profile curvature, and slope and divergenceconvergence<br />

index. In addition to these terrain attributes, principal component analyses (PCA) of<br />

primary geomorphometric parameters were produced to increase the quality of classification and to<br />

reduce modeled data. First three PCAs cover 97% of variance of the data. These PCAs and mentioned<br />

terrain parameters were selected for performing of K-means unsupervised landform classification<br />

model. Results indicated that unsupervised and manual classification can be complemented, such that<br />

conflation of the final maps obtained by these methods can produce a more accurate map. Also, the Kmeans<br />

algorithm with correct iterations, tolerance and suitable number of classes can be used for<br />

automated landform classification as well. Hybrid landform classification method is useful for soil<br />

survey and soil mapping especially, in watersheds and natural resource fields.<br />

Key words: Hybrid landform classification, geomorphometric parameters, K-means classifier, Pearson<br />

correlation coefficient.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Landforms are considered a central concept for soil<br />

development. It influences soil distribution, properties and<br />

processes that occur in soil pedon and catena. In<br />

different parts of the world, many studies have been<br />

carried out to show the relationships between landform<br />

elements and soil distribution. In soil survey and soil<br />

mapping procedures, the geomorphologic processes in<br />

delineating the landscape is inferred to find the controller<br />

process and cause of different types of soil. Besides,<br />

extracting soil-landscape relationships helps surveyors to<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: mkeghbal@modarse.ac.ir. Tel:<br />

+98912-2143795, +98 21-44108794. Fax: +98 21-48292273.<br />

judge and infer their tacit knowledge into modeling steps.<br />

A fundamental objective in geomorphologic clustering is<br />

to extract and classify landform units. These units provide<br />

primary view about the distribution of soil units. Most of<br />

the environmental processes depend on topography<br />

(Hugget and Cheesman, 2002) and if topography<br />

remains uniform, then the processes affect mostly the<br />

earth crust.<br />

There are different approaches to define and describe<br />

the landscape divisions (geomorphic units). These terms<br />

used in different approaches are more or less the same<br />

(Wilson and Gallant, 2000). Landform units are formed<br />

due to different geomorphic, hydrologic and pedologic<br />

processes in each landscape. Thus, based on the<br />

approach of Zink (1988), large areas are divided to


geomorphologic units such as landscape, landform and<br />

geomorphic surfaces. Each of them may be composed of<br />

one or several types of soil unit. Contiguous<br />

environmental processes make delineation and mapping<br />

of geomorphic or soil units difficult. Similarity in<br />

geomorphic units indicates uniformity in soil forming<br />

processes, therefore, we will be able to delineate uniform<br />

soil mapping unit. This induces that mapping topography<br />

will help us to delineate the soil units also (Etzelmüller<br />

and Sulebak, 2000). Different techniques from automatic<br />

(supervised and unsupervised algorithm) to hybrid (semiautomated)<br />

classification methods were used in landform<br />

classification for modeling of soil characteristics and<br />

spatial distribution of types of soils. In this context,<br />

improvements in Geographic Information Systems (GIS)<br />

and terrain analysis techniques allow developing soil<br />

survey models based on different new concepts such as<br />

geomorphometry. DEMs are used for analysis of<br />

topography, landscapes and landforms and extracting<br />

terrain attributes (Bishop and Shroder, 2000; Tucker et<br />

al., 2001). Many geomorphometric parameters are<br />

derived from DEMs.<br />

These parameters are used for automated landform<br />

classification and are more correlated with current digital<br />

soil mapping than conventional soil surveying. These<br />

morphometric attributes are divided to primary terrain<br />

attributes (for example, slope, aspect, elevation, plan<br />

curvature, profile curvature, total curvature, tangential<br />

curvature, surface curvature index, and shaded relief etc)<br />

and compound terrain attributes (for example,<br />

topographic wetness index, sediment transport capacity,<br />

and composite relief model etc) (Gallant and Wilson,<br />

2000). Both of them can be used to predict surface and<br />

sub-surface processes through automated landform<br />

classification. Digital soil mapping can be performed in<br />

different scales: from large (1:5,000) to small scales<br />

(1:500,000) depending on vertical and horizontal<br />

resolution of produced DEMs (Gallant and Wilson, 2000).<br />

Recently, studies on these topics has increased due to<br />

availability of high-resolution DEMs produced by different<br />

satellite data and software packages of terrain analysis<br />

systems (McMillan et al., 2003; McBratney et al., 2003;<br />

Smith et al., 2006). Many studies have shown that<br />

changes in goemorphometric parameters can cause<br />

intrinsic differences in elucidating the spatial distributions<br />

of the landform and soil units (Gallant and Wilson, 2000).<br />

Ventura and Irvin (2000) classified landform by<br />

applying the iso-clustering unsupervised classification<br />

method using six geomorphometric parameters. Their<br />

study showed that automated segmentation landform can<br />

separate units more detail than the conventional method.<br />

Moreno et al. (2005) also classified landscape<br />

automatically using GIS into landform elements based on<br />

geomorphometry. The results indicated that it is less time<br />

consuming with a rewarding conclusion compared to<br />

manual methods.<br />

Mousavi et al. (2007) assessed in their studies the<br />

Moravej et al. 2593<br />

extracted geomorphometric parameters from ASTER<br />

DEM with PCI GEOMATICA software in Damavand<br />

region (Iran). They derived five parameters which are<br />

useful in identifying and describing process and<br />

geomorphologic units: height, slop, aspect, vertical<br />

curvature and tangential curvature. These researchers<br />

concluded that ASTER DEM data, according to their<br />

technical specification and features, are appropriate for<br />

interpretation and production of geomorphic data in<br />

macro and meso scales, and only provide the possibility<br />

of topography in medium scales (1:100000 and 1:50000).<br />

Barka et al. (2011) used landform classification in<br />

predictive soil mapping at the forest area in Slovakia.<br />

Their evaluation indicated that terrain classification is one<br />

of the methods which can be used suitably in delineation<br />

of pedological and forestry units. Hengl and Rossiter<br />

(2003) used maximum likelihood classifier for landform<br />

classification to enhance the process and replace aerial<br />

photo interpretation in semi-detailed soil surveys. They<br />

used nine geomorphometric parameters extracted from<br />

DEM with a 10 m cell size to model landform<br />

classification. The result indicated that their methodology<br />

can be applied to update current maps and to enhance or<br />

replace aerial photo interpretation for new surveys.<br />

Umali et al. (2010) used a simple method to predict<br />

spatial pattern of soil organic carbon (SOC) using a<br />

substitute variable, soil color and digital terrain analysis in<br />

East of Adelaide, South Australia. They derived seven<br />

geomorphometric parameters from the DEMs (specific<br />

catchment area, profile curvature, wetness index, slope,<br />

plan curvature, sediment transport capacity index and<br />

tangential curvature). Also, they identified one hundred<br />

random points across the study area and value<br />

component of soil color was obtained. Spearman rank<br />

correlation analysis showed that elevation, specific<br />

catchment area, profile curvature and wetness index<br />

affects value component of soil color. They also found<br />

that the application of logicalness algorithms to DEMs<br />

derived from contour line maps produced better<br />

correlation coefficients as compared to unsmooth DEMs.<br />

With this background, it is assumed that quantitative<br />

geomorphology can be used for delineating landform<br />

units within a soil surveying procedure. Thus, the<br />

objectives of this study are: 1) to what extent the<br />

geomorphometric parameters and automated landform<br />

classification method can be used to replace<br />

physiographic classification method traditionally used for<br />

Iranian soil survey and soil mapping? 2) to what extent<br />

can satellite data from Google Earth replace aerial photo<br />

interpretations in soil survey and geomorphological<br />

studies?<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Condition of study area<br />

The study area is located on the Southern slopes of Alborz range,<br />

40 km South-east of Tehran (Figure 1). It is part of the major alluvial


2594 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 1. Location of the study area in Southeast of Tehran province, Iran.<br />

fan formed by Jajrood river watershed between 35˚20΄26˝ and<br />

35˚31΄09˝ N latitude and 51˚41΄52˝ and 51˚52΄32˝ E longitude.<br />

Mean elevation of region is 1250 m above sea level (1463 to<br />

950M). Variations of elevation were represented by Hypsometric<br />

map (Figure 2). Soil moisture and temperature regimes are weak<br />

aridic and thermic respectively. Topography of such regions is<br />

predominantly flat with the exception of the Northern part. General<br />

slope of the area runs from North to South. Soils of the region are<br />

generally classified (Moravej et al., 2003) in two orders of Entisols<br />

and Aridisols (USDA, 2010). The Varamin plain represents an intermountain<br />

basin that is bounded on the North by Alburz mountain<br />

range and on the South by Siah kuh range. Study area consists of<br />

Paleozoic and Mesozoic sediments and Eocene volcanic, which are<br />

covered with young Tertiary and Quaternary deposits of the Jajrood<br />

river. The river deposits, mainly from Pleistocene Epoch, are more<br />

than 300 m thick in some places and, through their sandy nature,<br />

represent an important reservoir of good quality groundwater. At the<br />

apex of the alluvial fan, the Jajrood river diverges into a large<br />

number of branches and its sediment-carrying capacity thus<br />

diminishes. Coarse and very coarse sediments therefore, occur at<br />

the apex; while farther downstream the sediments gradually<br />

becomes finer, passing into loam and silt in the lower parts of the<br />

fan.<br />

AUTOMATED LANDFORM CLASSIFICATION METHOD<br />

Pre-processing of the DEM<br />

The DEM of study area was downloaded form the ASTER GDEM<br />

web site. There are different acceptable procedures for producing,<br />

editing and correcting of DEM before starting the extraction of<br />

goemorphometric parameters (Lindsay, 2005; Liu et al., 2006).<br />

Improving methods more or less depends on the way the DEM is<br />

extracted (satellite data or contour lines). The procedures used in<br />

this research to increase the quality of DEM before extraction of<br />

geomorphometric parameters were: re-sampling of the ASTER<br />

DEM to 14 m to exploit full ortho image resolution. Then, DEM data<br />

was searched for sink. 9010 sinks were detected that filled by<br />

DiGem software to improve the quality of the DEM. Flat area<br />

drainage enforce command was performed to the DEM by TAS<br />

software. Without this, flow routing algorithms are unable to identify<br />

down slope neighbors in these areas and flow routing ceases. This<br />

command adds very small elevation adjustments to flat areas (that<br />

is, cells where the lowest neighbors have equal elevation) from the<br />

'pour point' backwards, so that flow routing algorithms can work<br />

properly. The algorithm used in this module is taken from Jenson<br />

and Dominique (1988). The study area is mostly flat to gently<br />

sloping except in the Northern part. So, it was important to know<br />

what the variation in elevation is within a grid cell size distance from<br />

the centre cell in a window. Consequently, a circular shaped<br />

window with 5 × 5 size was used for mean filtering of the raster<br />

DEM. A circular shape window seems more suitable than a square<br />

because the boundary of a circle will always be of equal distance to<br />

the focal point (Brabyn, 1998).<br />

Derivation of geomorphometric parameters<br />

All the important primary and secondary terrain attributes were


Figure 2. Hypsometric map of the study area.<br />

extracted using TAS Version 2.0.9 (Terrain Analysis Systems), a<br />

Software called White box GAT (Geospatial Analysis Tools)<br />

developed by Lindsay (2005) and DiGem software produced by<br />

Conrad (2002) of the Gottingen University. The extracted<br />

parameters which have been mapped separately are: Aspect,<br />

slope, curvature, Maximum Down Slope (MDS), Sediment<br />

Transport Capacity Index (STCI), Shaded Relief (SHR), Wetness<br />

Index (WI) or Topographic Index, Analytical Hill shade (AH),<br />

Divergence-Convergence Index (DCI), Plan Curvature (PL.C) and<br />

Profile Curvature (PR.C).<br />

Correlation among the geomorphometric parameters<br />

Some geomorphometric parameters have some correlation and<br />

contain similar information. When two parameters have positive<br />

correlation (between 0 to +1) it shows that increase in one<br />

parameter resulted from the increase in another one, and vice<br />

versa. Also, it shows that the presence of high correlated coefficient<br />

between two parameters means that there are some similarities in<br />

the data. To ordinate the geomorphometric parameters, the<br />

Moravej et al. 2595<br />

Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was computed<br />

between these parameters by White box GAT software. The<br />

primary correlation coefficients among mentioned extracted<br />

parameters vary from -0.09 to 0.99. So, high positive correlated<br />

parameters were omitted including: Curvature, MDS, and SHR.<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between the<br />

remained parameters [Aspect, Slope, Sediment Transport Capacity<br />

Index (STCI), Wetness Index (WI) or Topographic Index, Analytical<br />

Hill shade (AH), Divergence-Convergence Index (DCI), Plan<br />

Curvature (PL.C) and Profile Curvature (PR.C)]. For the second<br />

time (Table 1). As can be seen in this table, r varies from -0.291 to<br />

0.55.<br />

Principal components analysis (PCAs) of eight geomorphometric<br />

parameters was extracted to increase the quality of classification<br />

and to reduce the data. The outputs of correlation matrix extracted<br />

by PCA and Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) are exactly similar.<br />

So, principal components analysis was done for producing images<br />

that had maximum variance data. Subsequently, three parameters<br />

that had relatively high correlation with other parameters (STCI, WI,<br />

Aspect) were omitted and replaced by PCA1,2,3 that had the highest<br />

information variance (97% approximately).


2596 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) matrix.<br />

Parameter Aspect AH DCI PL.C PR.C Slope STCI WI<br />

Aspect 1 -0.291 0.210 0.051 0.036 0.357 0.209 0.550<br />

AH 1 0.037 0.029 0.008 0.261 0.177 0.219<br />

DCI 1 0.519 0.572 0.181 0.005 0.146<br />

PL.C 1 0.463 0.123 -0.069 0.113<br />

PR.C 1 0.035 -0.096 -0.002<br />

Slope 1 0.736 0.470<br />

STCI 1 0.384<br />

WI 1<br />

AH: Analytical hill shade, DCI: divergence-convergence index, PL.C: plan curvature, PR.C: profile curvature.<br />

Table 2. Geomorphic legend showing automated landform classification.<br />

Landscape Relief Lithology Landform Code<br />

Alluvial fan<br />

Hill land<br />

Low<br />

Coarse alluvial sediments over red marl with<br />

intercalations of well bedded sandstone.<br />

Middle-texture alluvial sediments over old gravel fan<br />

quaternary.<br />

Upper alluvial fan Af 111<br />

Middle alluvial fan Af 121<br />

Very low Fine alluvial sediments. Lower alluvial fan Af 211<br />

Low rolling hills<br />

Gray conglomerate with marl cement. Complex facet hillside Hi 111<br />

Light gray to light red alternation of conglomerate,<br />

sandstone with silt.<br />

Moderate (steeply dissected) Gray conglomerate with marl cement.<br />

Automated landform classification<br />

Selected terrain parameters (analytical hillshade, plan and profile<br />

curvature, slope and divergence-convergence index) and PCA1, 2, 3<br />

were treated as a single band images and using a K-mean<br />

unsupervised algorithm, the landforms were classified. This method<br />

finds statistically similar groups in multi spectral space during its<br />

analysis. The algorithm starts by randomly locating k clusters in<br />

spectral space. Each pixel in the input image group is then<br />

assigned to the nearest cluster centre and the cluster centre<br />

locations are moved to the average of their class values. This<br />

classification is then repeated until a stopping condition is reached.<br />

The stopping condition may either be a maximum number of<br />

iterations or a tolerance threshold which designates the smallest<br />

possible distance to move cluster centers before stopping the<br />

iterative process. In this approach, the determinative parameters<br />

were 10, 15 and 5 respectively, for the number of predictive class,<br />

maximum iteration and change tolerance. Post processing of this<br />

primary classification was done in ArcGIS software. Process was<br />

consisted of performance majority filtering and other cartographic<br />

rules.<br />

Manual landform classification<br />

Manual landform classification was done using Google Earth<br />

Complex facet hillside Hi 121<br />

Steeply dissected hillside Hi 211<br />

Moderately steep slope hillside Hi 212<br />

images, Geological maps (scale: 1:100000) and field works. To<br />

delineate the landforms and description of each unit, we have used<br />

the categories presented by Zink (1988) which clearly relates<br />

landforms to soil units. Legend of the delineated landforms is also<br />

defined. The primary map was exported to ArcGIS using KLM<br />

extension and final map was edited.<br />

Evaluation<br />

Classification algorithms can be evaluated by different methods.<br />

The most common methods are cross tabulation and error matrix<br />

analysis. The outputs of these tables are Kappa index, Chi square,<br />

Crammers V, Overall accuracy and etc. evaluation process was<br />

used to compare the frequency of cells belonging to all landform<br />

units within manual and automated landform classifications and for<br />

the purpose of accuracy assessment.<br />

RESULTS<br />

An automated landform classification map was produced<br />

at a scale of 1:50000. The result was a map with seven<br />

classes (Figure 3). Table 2 shows hierarchical landform


Land classification map<br />

Figure 3. Automated landform classification of study area.<br />

classification based on Zink method. The results<br />

indicated that diverged landforms mostly vary by variation<br />

of only two geomorphometric parameters (slope and hill<br />

shade). Although, some other parameters have more<br />

influence than others in different parts of the study area.<br />

For example, Af 121, Af 211 and Af 111 units were<br />

mostly separated by slope and partly hill shade factor in<br />

alluvial fan landscape. But, all of the used terrain<br />

parameters simultaneously affect the separation of<br />

landform units in hilly landscape with different intensities.<br />

Although, Analytical hill shade parameter has more<br />

influence in some landform units located in hilly<br />

landscape.<br />

In the manual method, eight soil-landscape units (three<br />

in the piedmont area and five in the hilly landscape) were<br />

identified using the Zink method (Figure 4 and Table 3).<br />

Cross tabulation was used for accuracy analysis and<br />

evaluation of manual and unsupervised classification<br />

(Table 4). Comparison of these methods indicates that: 1)<br />

Af 211 unit in manual method is divided into three<br />

Moravej et al. 2597<br />

different landform units (Af 111, Af 121 and Af 211) in the<br />

automated classification; 2) Hi 211 unit in unsupervised<br />

landform classification was not separated in the manual<br />

segmentation; 3) Hi 121 and Hi 212 units were delineated<br />

with relatively good accuracy in manual and automated<br />

methods, respectively; 4) Hi 211 and Hi 212 in the<br />

manual method were integrated to Hi 121 and Hi 111 in<br />

automated method, respectively; 5) Hi 111 unit in the<br />

manual method is divided into two units (Hi 111 and Hi<br />

121) in the automated classification mainly by differences<br />

in analytical hill shade parameter; 6) Af 111 unit in<br />

automated segmentation was divided to unit (Af 111 and<br />

Af 121) in manual segmentation. Although, Af 111 and Af<br />

121 are similar in terrain parameters, but they are<br />

different in evolution processes and it is better that they<br />

are separated. Important point to consider in comparing<br />

the two methods is manual and unsupervised<br />

classification can be used complementally for areas that<br />

are unavailable or study was limited point of cost and<br />

time.


2598 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 3. Geomorphic legend showing manual landform classification.<br />

Landscape Relief Lithology Landform Code<br />

Alluvial fan<br />

Hill land<br />

Low<br />

Coarse alluvial sediments over red marl with<br />

intercalations of well bedded sandstone.<br />

Very coarse-texture alluvial sediments over<br />

young gravel fan quaternary.<br />

Upper alluvial fan Af 111<br />

Young alluvial fan Af 121<br />

Very low Middle and fine alluvial sediments. Lower alluvial fan Af 211<br />

Low rolling hills<br />

Gray conglomerate with marl cement. Complex facet hillside Hi 111<br />

Light gray to light red alternation of<br />

conglomerate, sandstone with silt.<br />

Moderate (steeply dissected) Gray conglomerate with marl cement.<br />

Table 4. Cross-tabulation for manual and automated landform classification.<br />

Unsupervised classification<br />

Manual classification<br />

Complex facet hillside Hi 121<br />

Steeply dissected hillside Hi 211<br />

Steeply dissected hillside Hi 212<br />

Af 111 Af 211 Af 121 Hi 211 Hi 121 Hi 111 Hi 212<br />

Af 111 345 1353 1086 0 9 40 0 3563<br />

Af 211 0 13144 116 0 0 0 0 11260<br />

Af 121 0 3702 730 0 0 0 0 5702<br />

Hi 211 35 0 0 0 142 85 0 333<br />

Hi 121 0 0 0 71 908 290 14 147<br />

Hi 111 0 0 291 140 54 309 84 3962<br />

Hi 212 1 2071 0 0 794 4 0 852<br />

Total 381 20270 2224 211 1907 728 98 25819<br />

Kappa index: 0.507, overall accuracy: 0.596, Crammer's V: 0.7205.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

It is logical to assume that increases of one<br />

geomorphometric parameter can cause a decrease or<br />

increase in other parameters; especially, compound<br />

terrain attributes that are extracted from primary terrain<br />

attributes. Some of these parameters correlate with each<br />

other and have positive or negative co-relationships. At<br />

the same time, some geomorphometric parameters have<br />

the same basic mathematical formulas which describe<br />

relationships between them. It is clear that, correlation<br />

between some geomorphometric parameters in one area<br />

can not be used for other areas (Debella-Gilo et al.,<br />

2007). Thus, in each area, depending on the natural<br />

dominant process, one can find different relationships<br />

between geomorphometric parameters.<br />

The ASTER DEM data is a suitable source for<br />

derivation of geomorphometric parameters (Kamp et al.,<br />

2003), automated landform classification and soil survey<br />

at a medium scale (1:50000) or order 3 to 4 and smaller<br />

Total<br />

scale soil surveys (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993,<br />

Tables 2 and 1). However, in areas with less relief or flat<br />

topography, in addition to ASTER DEM, use of other data<br />

is suggested, such as remote sensing data and their<br />

indexes for increasing the accuracy of outputs. In this<br />

study, the accuracy of landform map decreases with<br />

reduction of relief. In order to obtain better results, field<br />

observations, consumption of more time and money is<br />

essential. The ASTER DEM data are available freely for<br />

many parts of the world including Iran.<br />

The Google Earth images have many advantages for<br />

landform classification as compared with traditional aerial<br />

photos: 1) its images are colored instead of black and<br />

white photos and as such, interpretation of landform data<br />

is easier; 2) Google earth images have more temporal<br />

resolution than aerial photos; 3) the images and its<br />

related data are available everywhere and every time; 4)<br />

it has capability link to ArcGIS software easily and<br />

produced layers that have coordinate system in Lat/Long<br />

and UTM format; 5) some of primary cartographic errors


Manual landform classification<br />

Figure 4. Landform classification map using the manual method.<br />

can be corrected for these images; 6) no stereoscope is<br />

needed for a 3D-View; 7) it is more economical, low cost<br />

and saves time as compared with aerial photos. Hengl<br />

and Rossiter (2003) used aerial photo interpretation for<br />

supervised landform classification. They gave some<br />

limitations and ways to overcome them.<br />

The advantages of the automated landform<br />

classification (Dikau et al., 1991) as compared with the<br />

manual method are: 1) it can provide a more detail<br />

geomorphic map, soil survey and soil classification if the<br />

data and parameters used for the classification are<br />

accurate and proportional to topographic variations of the<br />

study area; 2) if suitable algorithm classification was<br />

selected, classification can result in more accurate<br />

output; 3) it can be used for quantitative studies of the<br />

relationship between geomorphometric parameters and<br />

surface processes; 4) it can easily be processed into<br />

different GIS softwares, and it is easily exportable,<br />

importable and interpretable. Unfortunately, the terrain<br />

attributes to be used as parameters for the supervised<br />

and unsupervised classification do not have the capability<br />

for standardization for everywhere. So, the validity of the<br />

Moravej et al. 2599<br />

classification is dependent on its ability in showing the<br />

changes in geomorphic (Debella-Gilo et al., 2007); 5)<br />

automated landform classification and selected terrain<br />

parameters can be easily tested to other areas that have<br />

similar topography and geomorphology (Brabyn, 1998).<br />

Unsupervised classification algorithms without field<br />

observations cannot always result in correct<br />

classifications. The best method is to use the manual and<br />

unsupervised classification together (Hybrid<br />

classification). Hybrid landform classification method and<br />

use of Google Earth data as a color composite image of<br />

geomorphometric parameters are very useful for soil<br />

survey and soil mapping, especially, for developing<br />

countries. Automated classification makes more detailed<br />

output than traditional semi detailed survey. Some of the<br />

Iranian soil maps are old and they need to be updated, so<br />

that use of such methods can be very useful and<br />

economical.<br />

For many years, delineation of physiographic units has<br />

been the basis for soil survey in Iran. In such<br />

delineations, less attention is being paid to geomorphic<br />

landforms and processes. Geomorphologic studies are


2600 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

very important and it is essential that soil scientists are<br />

aware of geomorphic relations to soil formations and<br />

distributions (Alavipanah et al., 2009). Geomorphometric<br />

parameters can be used successfully for soil survey and<br />

results can be more accurate if they were used in<br />

association with geomorphologic studies.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Alavipanah S, Matinfar KHR, Rafiei Emam A (2009). The application of<br />

information technology in the earth science (on digital soil mapping).<br />

Tehran university press.<br />

Barka I, Vladovic J, Malis F (2011). Landform classification and its<br />

application in predictive mapping of soil and forest units. GIS Ostrava<br />

2011. 1: 23–26. 2011, Ostrava.<br />

Brabyn L (1998). GIS analysis of macro landform. Department of<br />

geology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Proceeding<br />

of the Spatial Information Research Centers. Presented at the 10 th<br />

Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centers, University of<br />

Otago, New Zealand, 16-19 November.<br />

Conrad O (2002). DiGeM (Digital Gelande - Medell) -Software for digital<br />

terrain analysis, URL. http://www.geogr.unigeottingen.de/pg/saga/digem/.<br />

Etzelmüller B, Sulebak JR (2000). Developments in the use of digital<br />

elevation models in periglacial geomorphology and glaciology.<br />

Physische Geographie, p. 41.<br />

Bishop MP, Shroder JF (2000). Remote sensing and geomorphometric<br />

assessment of topographic complexity and erosion dynamics in the<br />

Nanga Parbat massif. Geological Society London, Special<br />

Publication, 170: 181-199.<br />

Debella-Gilo M, Etzelmuller B, Klakegg Ove (2007). Digital soil mapping<br />

using digital terrain analysis and statistical modeling integrated into<br />

GIS: Examples from Vestfold County of Norway. Proceedings, Scan<br />

GIS, pp. 237-254.<br />

Dikau R, Brabb EE, Mark RM (1991). Landform Classification of New<br />

Mexico by computer. Open File report pp. 91-634. U.S. Geol. Surv.<br />

Gallant JC, Wilson DJ (2000). Primary topographic attributes. In: D.J.<br />

Wilson and J.C. Gallant (Editors), Terrain Analysis: Principles and<br />

Applications. John Willey & Sons, INC, New York, pp. 51-85.<br />

Hengl T, Rossiter DG (2003). Supervised landform classification to<br />

enhance and replace photo-interpretation in semi-detailed soil<br />

survey. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 67(6): 1810-1822.<br />

Hugget R, Cheesman J (2002). Topography and the environment.<br />

Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.<br />

http://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp/search.jsp.<br />

Jenson SK, Dominique JO (1988). `Extraction of topographic structure<br />

from digital elevation data for geographic information system<br />

analysis', Photogram. Eng. Rem. Sens., 54: 1593±1600.<br />

Kamp U, Bolch T, Olsenholler J (2003). DEM generation from ASTER<br />

satellite data for geomorphometric analysis of Cerro Sillajhuey,<br />

CHILE/BOLIVIA. ASPR Annual Conference Proceedings, Anchorage,<br />

Alaska.<br />

Lindsay J (2005). Terrain Analysis System, Version 2.0.9 (TAS).<br />

University of Guelf.<br />

Liu TL, Juang KW, Lee DY (2006). Interpolating soil properties using<br />

kriging combined with categorical information of soil maps. Soil Sci.<br />

Soc. Amer. J., 70(4): 1200-1209.<br />

Mc Bratney AB, Mendonca Santos ML, Minasny B (2003). on digital soil<br />

mapping, Geoderma, 117, 3-52.<br />

Mc Millan RA, Martin TC, Earle TJ, McNabb DH (2003) automated<br />

analysis and classification of landforms using high-resolution digital<br />

elevation data: Applications and <strong>Issue</strong>s, Cana. J. Remote Sen., 29:<br />

592-606.<br />

Moravej K, Mahmoudi S.H, Sarmadian F (2003). Classification and mapping<br />

of Varamin Plain (south east of Tehran province, Iran) soils using satellite<br />

images derived from T.M sensor. Iran. J. Nat. Res., 56(3): 177-189.<br />

Mousavi SR, Fallah A, Abbasnejadc RA, Shabani M (2007). The Aster<br />

DEM Generation for geomorphometric analysis of central alborz<br />

mountains, Iran. www.isprs2007ist.itu.edu.tr/18.pdf.<br />

Smith MP, Zhu AX, Burt JE, Stiles C (2006). The Effects of DEM<br />

Resolution and neighborhood size on digital soil survey, Geoderma,<br />

137: 58-69.<br />

Tucker GE, Catani F, Rinaldo A, Bras RL (2001). Statistical analysis of<br />

drainage density from digital terrain data. Geomorphology, 36: 187-<br />

202.<br />

Umali B, Chittleborough D, Kookana R, Ostendorf B (2010). DEM and<br />

terrain analysis to predict spatial pattern of SOC.19th world congress<br />

of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world. 1 – 6 August 2010,<br />

Brisbane, Australia.<br />

USDA (2010). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Tenth edition, Nat. Resour.<br />

Conserv. Serv.<br />

Ventura SJ, Irvin BJ (2000). Automated landform classification methods<br />

for soil landscape studies. In: D.J. Wilson and J.C. Gallant (Editors),<br />

Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons,<br />

INC, New York, pp. 267-290.<br />

Wilson JP, Gallant JC, (2000). Terrain analysis, principles and<br />

applications. ISBN 0-471-32188-5., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.<br />

Zink JA (1988). Physiography & Soils. ITC Lecture Notes. Enschede,<br />

The Netherlands.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2601-2608, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1206<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield,<br />

quality and some quantitative parameters of flue-cured<br />

tobacco cv. K326<br />

Ali Reza Farrokh 1 *, Ibrahim Azizov 2 , Atoosa Farrokh 3 , Masoud Esfahani 4 , Mehdi Ranjbar<br />

Choubeh 5 and Masoud Kavoosi 6<br />

1 Young Researchers Club, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.<br />

2 Institute of Botany, National Academy of Science, Republic of Azerbaijan.<br />

3 Islamic Azad University, Branch Qazvin, Iran.<br />

4 Scientific Board of Guilan University, Iran.<br />

5 Tobacco Research Institute, Iran.<br />

6 Scientific Board of Rice Research Institute, Iran.<br />

Accepted 2 March, 2012<br />

In order to investigate the effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on yield, quality and some<br />

quantitative parameters of flue-cured tobacco, 2 year experiment was carried out in tobacco research<br />

institute of Rasht located in Guilan province on factorial based with 3 replications. The applied fertilizer<br />

levels included 35 (N1), 45 (N2), 55 (N3) and 65 (N4) kg N/ha of pure nitrogen of urea source and<br />

potassium in two levels of 150 (K1) and 200 (K2) kg K/ha of potassium sulphate. The measured<br />

parameters in this experiment included leaf dry weight, leaf wet weight, stem height, stem diameter, leaf<br />

number in plant, leaf length, leaf width, stem dry weight, biomass, nicotine and sugar content. The<br />

effect of year on parameters such as leaf dry weight, leaf wet weight, stem height, leaf number, leaf<br />

length, stem dry weight, biomass and sugar content was significant (P


2602 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

class of neutral (non aromatic) tobaccos which has a little<br />

direct relation with the name of Virginia State of USA.<br />

Dried flue- cured tobacco is the only source of a special<br />

British cigarette which is different from other European-<br />

American common tobacco (Virginian). The stronger<br />

degrees of tobacco mostly were used for pipe tobacco<br />

(Ranjbar, 2005). Western types of tobacco belong to fluecured<br />

tobacco which sufficient water and nutrients are<br />

needed for its cultivation and fertilizing lands by chemical<br />

fertilizers are necessary and inevitable. The main reason<br />

of using fertilizers is not just raising the crop yield and<br />

produced tobacco quality has also its own importance<br />

(Shamel, 1995). Fertilizer is a compound which directly<br />

and indirectly improves plant growth, tobacco quality<br />

degree and finally farmers’ income. The farmers should<br />

be very aware of the quality of used fertilizers. In tobacco<br />

cultivation contrary to other crops, disproportionate<br />

fertilizers usage has not only positive effect, but also to<br />

some extent decreases tobacco quality and imposes<br />

economical damage on farmers so the amount of added<br />

fertilizers is very critical. On the other hand, using the<br />

same definite amount of fertilizers for all different crop<br />

lands does not seem logical because the fertility, texture<br />

and type of soils would differ (Fajri, 1998). The goal of<br />

tobacco farmers should be improvement of fertilizer<br />

program for fulfilling plant nutritional needs and reducing<br />

fertilizer costs and environmental effects. To approach<br />

this objective, farmers require a fertilizer plan based on<br />

soil examination to determine the quantity and availability<br />

of soil minerals. The fertilizer selection should be<br />

designed according to plant needs and level of soil<br />

productivity, fertilizer costs and proper application of<br />

fertilizers.<br />

The excessive usage of fertilizers causes wasting of<br />

natural resources and nutrients and increases the<br />

probability of environment pollution outbreak as well as<br />

imposing high costs (Zargami, 2006). Nitrogen is one of<br />

the elements which is needed in all parts of plant life.<br />

Farmers are increasingly persuaded to use more nitrogen<br />

fertilizers in order to improve the crop yield because of<br />

the remarkable nutritional effect of nitrogen on yield and<br />

low nitrate nitrogen content in soils (Khodabandeh,<br />

1997). The usual nitrogen content is between 2 to 5%.<br />

The nitrogen deficiency symptoms appear when nitrogen<br />

content is below 1.5% (Sabeti and Mohammad, 2004).<br />

More nitrogen content reduces starch storage and<br />

intensifies more formation of leaves nicotine. Low and<br />

insufficient nitrogen content limits nicotine formation and<br />

increases starch storage. This type of tobacco is<br />

undesirable and chemically imbalanced and has high<br />

sugar to nicotine ratio and produces tasteless smoke<br />

(Zargami, 2006). Potassium is in silicate form in soil and<br />

exists in igneous stones (granite and feldespat) or<br />

particles from their decomposition and seen on the<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: ar_farrokh274@yahoo.com.<br />

surface of soil colloids or ions in soil solution (Ebrahimi,<br />

2001). Tobacco cultivar TT5 was fertilized by different<br />

level of nitrogen and in order to determine free amino<br />

acid compound, fresh leaves were sampled after<br />

transplantation in each 2 weeks intervals. The main acids<br />

included proline, glutamic acid, alanine and asparat acid<br />

which composed 65 to 75% of free amino acids.<br />

Remarkable changes happened in quantity of proline and<br />

glutamic acid during growth stage. Glutamic acid was<br />

dominant at transplantation time and its quantity became<br />

maximum until 4 weeks before topping. Proline is just<br />

found in a little amount in fresh. The total amino acids<br />

content except glutamic acid got maximum amount<br />

before topping. The free amino acids content increases<br />

by adding more nitrogen but usage excessive nitrogen at<br />

the early growth stages led to low amounts of free amino<br />

acids compared to other treatments. Among tested free<br />

amino acids, proline was highly affected by nitrogen.<br />

Proline content got 20 times greater when more nitrogen<br />

was applied. The ratio of each amino acid (except proline<br />

and glutamic acid) to the total free amino acids in the<br />

same growth stage was not too high (Hu et al., 1985).<br />

Compared to other tobacco growth stages, 45 days<br />

after transplanting leaves had the greatest nitrogen<br />

content. When nicotine and calcium was increased during<br />

tobacco growth, leaf nitrogen content was reduced. The<br />

correlation between leaf nicotine and potassium was<br />

negative (Patel et al., 1987). In order to investigate the<br />

effect of potassium on carbon metabolism and flue-cured<br />

tobacco quality, an experiment carried out in china. The<br />

results indicated that invertase and amylase activity<br />

during middle and final growth stages increased by<br />

adding proper amount of potassium. 60 days after<br />

transplanting, leaf carbohydrates content increased. Leaf<br />

sugar and starch content increased by adding more<br />

potassium in middle and final tobacco growth stages.<br />

Tobacco metabolism increased and more carbohydrate<br />

was stored by using more potassium in next tobacco<br />

growth stages and leaf potassium content increased at<br />

the same time (Gu et al., 1987). For investigating the<br />

effect of potassium (80, 200, 400, 600 and 800 kg K/ha)<br />

on topping on leaf potassium content, yield and quality of<br />

flue-cured tobacco cv. McNair12, a vase experiment<br />

conducted in India. Based on obtained results, leaf dry<br />

yield, green leaf yield, leaf degree value and burning rate<br />

increased by usage of 800 kg K/ha. The differences<br />

among nicotine, sugar and chloride content in topped<br />

plants and non topped ones were not significant. The<br />

upper and lower leaves had the most thickness due to<br />

applying 80 kg K/ha in topped plants and non topped<br />

ones. In control treatment, the middle leavers had the<br />

most thickness (Rao and Rao, 1993). In another<br />

experiment, different amounts of nitrogen and potassium<br />

fertilizers were applied and also the same nitrogen:<br />

potassium ratio was used for determining the level of CTK<br />

and ABA of flue-cured tobacco leaves in status of non<br />

absorptive bond enzyme. CTK level increase by leaf<br />

growth and gradually decreased by leaf ripening.


The most CTK level was gained in leaf blade. But CTK<br />

levels was greater when more nitrogen and potassium<br />

were used compared to other treatments. ABA level of<br />

leaf blade increased during leaf growth and ripening. As a<br />

result, providing enough nitrogen and proper N:P:K ratio<br />

is very effective in production of flue-cured tobacco (Lin<br />

and He, 1999).<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

In order to investigate the nitrogen and potassium fertilizers effects<br />

on yield, quality and some quantitative characteristics of flue-cured,<br />

tobacco cv. K326, a two year experiment conducted in 2008 and<br />

2009 with 35 (N1), 45 (N2), 55(N3), 65 (N4) kg N/ha nitrogen from<br />

urea source and 150 (K1), 200 kg K/ha potassium from potassium<br />

sulphate source regarding common condition of region and experts<br />

advice in factorial design at Tobacco Research Institute of Rasht<br />

located in Guilan province at longitude 49˚ 3 ΄ east and latitude 37˚<br />

16΄ north and 25 altitude from sea level. In March 2007 and 2008,<br />

the nursery of tobacco seedling was prepared and then disinfected<br />

using vapan (0.1 L/m 2 ) and covered by plastic after 20 days. The<br />

cover was removed and leveling and beating of nursery bed started<br />

at the end, fermented animal fertilizer was used in 0.5 to 1 cm<br />

thickness and seeds were scattered over 0.1 to 0.18 m 2 of nursery.<br />

From this time until transplanting of seedlings to the main field, all<br />

operations like irrigation, covering the nursery at nights, spraying<br />

pesticides were carried out. The field of experiment kept fallow the<br />

years before sowing and field providing activities such as fall tillage<br />

and rather deep spring tillage vertical to fall tillage were performed<br />

and 4 L/ha radical herbicide was used before sowing and mixed<br />

with soil through disking. In order to measure the physical and<br />

chemical parameters of soil, after providing of main land, a<br />

composed soil sample was taken from 0 to 30 cm depth. After<br />

ploughing and primary leveling by hoe, the seedlings were<br />

transplanted in 6 lines when they were 20 to 50 cm high. The space<br />

between rows was 110 cm and between plants on rows was 55 cm.<br />

The space between plots and replications were 1.5 and 2.5 m<br />

respectively. 50% of determined fertilizer level for each plot was<br />

applied before sowing and transplanting. Irrigation time was<br />

determined using a tensiometer based on suction power of 40 to 50<br />

cm bar. Weeding control was performed twice.<br />

In order to prevent Agrotis damages, Ambush and Noakran were<br />

used 1.4 L/ha respectively. 50% of remained fertilizer level was<br />

applied on two bands (the distance between bands was 10 cm) in<br />

10 cm depth of soil. Topping in tobacco is one of the most important<br />

performances for growth and evolution of remained leaves of plant<br />

and their quality. In this experiment, topping was performed when<br />

50% of plants reached flowering stage. For this purpose, all flowers<br />

plus 2 to 3 terminal leaves were cut. Afterwards, in order to<br />

prevent lateral buds from growing and evolving, maleic hydrasid<br />

containing potassium salt was sprayed over plants. The<br />

investigated parameters in this article include: leaf dry weight, leaf<br />

wet weight, stem height, stem diameter, plant leaf number, leaf<br />

length, leaf width, nicotine and sugar content. Tobacco leaves ripen<br />

gradually from bottom during growth stages. At industrial ripening,<br />

leaves are harvested through 4 picks. The harvested leaves at<br />

every picks are first measured after carrying to saloon and the<br />

green leaves weight were recorded. Afterwards, the leaves were<br />

separately setup at the petiole over the cassetes and transferred to<br />

the Balk Gurin hot –house for drying. The leaves passed three<br />

steps to give color, fixation and drying. The harvested stems were<br />

conveyed to the hot-house for three days for drying and then their<br />

weight was measured. The plant leaf number was recorded by<br />

counting of leaves. Leaf length was measured from soil surface to<br />

the top of inflorescence by ruler.<br />

In order to measure the stem thickness, 30 to 40 cm above the<br />

Farrokh et al. 2603<br />

soil surface was considered and measured by caliper. Leaf number<br />

was recorded by counting. Leaf length was measured from initiation<br />

of petiole to the tip of leaf by ruler and the widest part of leaf was<br />

considered as a leaf width and measured. The auto analyzer set<br />

was used for measuring sugar and nicotine content and the<br />

measurement method was based on Porine ring or Cyanojen<br />

formation. This complex produces yellow color in the vicinity of<br />

aniline buffer and could be measured by chlorimeter set in 460 nm<br />

wave-length. For measurement of reductive sugar percentage,<br />

reactions of reductive sugar were used, that the yellow color of<br />

Cyanid Ferric weakens through reductive sugars. The weakening of<br />

color depends on the amount of reductive sugars existed in extract<br />

which is measurable in chlorimeter set . In order to determine leaf<br />

sugar and nicotine content, 0.1 g milled tobacco leaf sample was<br />

solved in100 ml distilled water and stirred for 20 min by shaker set.<br />

The derived extract was poured into auto analyzer dishes and<br />

measured after filtering. Analysis of variance and means<br />

comparisons were done by SAS software.<br />

The effect of year<br />

Variance analysis indicated that the effect of year on parameters<br />

like dry leaf yield, wet leaf yield, stem height, plant leaf number,<br />

stem diameter, leaf length, stem dry weight, biomass, nicotine and<br />

sugar content was significant (P


2604 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Average decomposition of variance squares of the studied qualities.<br />

Suger Nicotin Biomass<br />

Stalk dry<br />

weight<br />

Leaf width Leaf length Leaf number<br />

Stalk<br />

diameter<br />

Stalk height<br />

Green leaf<br />

yield<br />

Dry leaf yield<br />

Changes<br />

sources (s.o.v)<br />

467.8379441** 166145333.3** 6697602.083** 98623.802** 6453333.33 220.7634083** 544.5921333** 5.10255208 4554.03440** 216032345.0** 2544262.521** Year<br />

10.5395896** 0.15549722 1341879.944** 448396.561** 7.36833333* 40.6360750** 11.0224278 7.94229097* 414.117786 64663730.9** 252327.743* Nitrogen<br />

30.4868441** 0.36053333 29205.333 63267.997 0.40333333 4.1654083 5.2668750 6.49005208 215.222700 12629034.2 6417.187 Potassuym<br />

0.9054308 0.45508889 1239942.944** 352951.371* 10.89722222* 36.8558528** 28.5269139** 10.39511319* 466.166767 27800245.6* 313240.632*<br />

Potassium<br />

nitrogen<br />

×<br />

0.7006507 0.18553333 455475.583* 110173.170 8.03055556* 40.6360750** 12.0754833 6858957.64 188.600564 3475821.7 123646.854 Nitrogen × year<br />

0.8677941 0.37100833 81510.083 10111.149 0.27000000 23.1574083 0.0252083 6.49005208 22.742533 503275.5 3397.521 Potassium × year<br />

2.2954519 0.13547500 56263.368 3320.714 4.81944444 6.4878528 2.5895806 0.76733542 30.783267 2885628.4 40143.965<br />

Potassium ×<br />

nitrogen × year<br />

Table 2. Comparison of average effect of year for the studied qualities.<br />

Suger Nicotin Biomass Stalk dry weight Leaf length Leaf number Stalk height Green leaf yield Dry leaf yield Year<br />

10/60 b 2.18 a 2336.2 b 820.7 b 43.98 a 24.01 b 113.64 b 12296 b 1515.5 b First<br />

16/84 a 1.00 b 3083.3 a 1107.3 a 29.69 b 30.75 a 113.64 a 16539 a 1976.0 a Second<br />

Table 3. Comparison of average effect of nitrogen for the studied qualities.<br />

Suger Biomass Stalk dry weight Leaf width Leaf length Stalk diameter Green leaf yield Dry leaf yield Nitrogen<br />

14/82 a 3172.7 a 1214.9 a 19.31 a 44.52 a 23.06 a 173671 a 1957.7 a 35<br />

13/96 a 2608.3 b 911.9 b 17.50 b 42.91 ab 22.22 ab 15168 a 1696.3 b 45<br />

13/55 ab 2679.9 b 980.0 ab 19.61 a 42.37 ab 23.24 a 12390 b 1699.9 b 55<br />

12/56 b 2378.1 b 749.1 b 17.99 ab 40.35 b 21.51 b 12746 b 1629.0 b 65<br />

The greatest amount of stem dry weight (1214.9 Kg/ha) is<br />

allotted to the treatment in which 35 Kg N/ha was applied.<br />

The average stem dry weight of 980 Kg/ha was in the<br />

second class and obtained when 55 Kg N/ha was applied.<br />

The least stem dry weight with average weight of 911.9<br />

and 749.1 Kg/ha was observed when 45 and 65 Kg N/ha<br />

was applied respectively. The greatest biomass with<br />

average weight of 3172.7 Kg/ha was obtained when 35 Kg<br />

N/ha was applied. The average biomass weights of 2679.9,<br />

2608.3 and 2378 Kg/ha were in the second class and<br />

obtained when 55, 45 and 65 Kg N/ha were utilized<br />

respectively. The highest sugar content with averages of<br />

14.82 and 13.96% were gotten when 35 and 45 Kg N/ha<br />

were applied respectively. 55 Kg N/ha level was in the<br />

second class by production of 12.56% sugar content. The<br />

least sugar content (12.56%) was determined when 65 Kg<br />

N/ha was applied.<br />

The effect of potassium<br />

Potassium showed significant effect on sugar content<br />

(P


Table 4. Comparison of average effect of potassium for the<br />

studied qualities.<br />

Suger Potassium<br />

12.93 b 150<br />

14.52 a 200<br />

at 5% statistical level was significant (Table 1). The greatest dry leaf<br />

yield with average weight of 2070 kg/ha was associated with using<br />

35 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha. Applying 35 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha,<br />

65 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha and 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha led to<br />

produce of 1845.3, 1838.7 and 1773.2 kg dry leaf yield per hectare<br />

respectively which lies on the second class.<br />

The fertilizer levels of 45 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and 55 kg<br />

N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha which led to 1619.5 and 1572 kg dry leaf<br />

yield per hectare respectively were in the third class. The least dry<br />

leaf yield (1419.3 kg/ha) was associated with usage of 65 kg N/ha<br />

plus 200 kg K/ha. The maximum green leaf yield with averages<br />

of 18094 and 16640 kg/ha belonged to fertilizer treatments of 35 kg<br />

N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and 35 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha<br />

respectively. Applying 45 Kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha, 65 kg N/ha plus<br />

150 kg K/ha led to produce of 15501 and 14835 kg green leaf yield<br />

per hectare respectively which lies on the second class. Fertilizer<br />

levels of 55 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha and 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg<br />

K/ha placed in third class (12823 and 11957 kg green leaf yield per<br />

hectare respectively). The least green leaf yield (10067 kg/ha) was<br />

associated with fertilizer level of 65 Kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha. The<br />

highest stem diameter (24.42 mm) produced when 35 kg N/ha plus<br />

200 kg K/ha was applied. Using 45 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha, 45 kg<br />

N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha, 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha, 35 kg N/ha<br />

plus 150 Kg K/ha, 65 kg N/ha plus 200 Kg K/ha led to average of<br />

22.32, 22.10, 22.03, 21.7 and 20.70 mm stem diameter which is<br />

placed in the second class. The greatest leaf number (30.21<br />

leaves) was associated with usage of 35 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha.<br />

The average leaf number of 28.68 which was produced under<br />

fertilizer level of 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha was in the second<br />

class. Level of 45 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha led to average leaf<br />

number of 27.83 leaves was in the third class. The fertilizer levels of<br />

45 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha, 35 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha, 55 kg<br />

N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha, 65 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha which lead to<br />

average leaf numbers of 27.25, 26.95, 25.58 and 24.72 leaves<br />

respectively were in next classes. The greatest leaf length with<br />

average of 46.28 cm obtained when 35 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha<br />

was applied. Levels of 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and 35 kg N/ha<br />

plus 150 kg K/ha which led to 42.85 and 42.75 cm leaf length were<br />

in the second class. The third class of leaf length was associated<br />

with applying 45 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha, 65 kg N/ha plus 200 kg<br />

K/ha, 45 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha, 55 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha<br />

which lead to average leaf lengths of 42.10, 42.03, 40.73 and 39.3<br />

cm respectively. The minimum leaf length (38.67 cm) was observed<br />

in fertilizer level of 65 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha. The maximum leaf<br />

width (19.42 cm) was seen in fertilizer levels of 35 kg N/ha plus 200<br />

kg K/ha and 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha. Fertilizer levels of 65 kg<br />

N/ha plus 150 Kg K/ha, 35 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha and 45 kg N/ha<br />

plus 150 kg K/ha which led to average leaf width of 19.1, 18.68 and<br />

18.18 were all in the second class.<br />

The least leaf widths (16.87 and 16.82 cm) were associated with<br />

fertilizer level of 65 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and 45 kg N/ha plus<br />

200 kg K/ha. The maximum stem dry weigh with average weights of<br />

1332.2 and 1216.9 kg/ha were associated with fertilizer levels of 35<br />

kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and 55 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha. The<br />

level of 35 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha which led to average stem<br />

dried weight of 1096.7 kg/ha was in a second class. The third class<br />

of stem dry weight belonged to usage of 45 kg N/ha plus 150 kg<br />

K/ha by average stem dry weight of 1043.5 kg/ha. All fertilizer levels<br />

Farrokh et al. 2605<br />

of 65 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha, 45kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and 55<br />

kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha which respectively led to average weights<br />

of 827.4, 780.3 and 743.2 kg/ha were in forth class. The least stem<br />

dry weight (670.9 kg/ha) was associated with usage of 65 kg N/ha<br />

plus 200 kg K/ha. The greatest amount of biomass (3043.2 kg/ha)<br />

was associated with usage of 35 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha. The<br />

next classes were associated with fertilizer levels of 55 kg N/ha plus<br />

200 kg K/ha, 35 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha, 45 kg N/ha plus 150 kg<br />

K/ha, 65 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha, 45 kg N/ha plus 200 kg K/ha and<br />

55 kg N/ha plus 150 kg K/ha which led to average weights of<br />

3044.5, 2942.2, 2816.8, 2666, 2399 and 2090.2 kg/ha respectively<br />

(Table 5).<br />

The interaction between year and nitrogen<br />

The interaction between year and nitrogen on leaf length was<br />

significant (P


2606 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 5. Comparison of average interaction effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers for the studied qualities.<br />

Biomass Stalk dry weight Leaf length Leaf number Leaf number Stalk diameter Green leaf yield Dry leaf yield Treatments<br />

2942.2 b 1096.7 ab 18.68 ab 42.750 a 26.950 bcd 21.70 b 16640 a 1845.3 ab N35K150<br />

3403.2 a 1333.2 a 19.42 a 46.283 a 30.210 a 24.42 a 18094 a 2070.0 a N35K200<br />

2816.8 bc 1043.5 abc 18.82 ab 42.100 abc 27.838 ab 22.10 b 14835 ab 1773.2 ab N45K150<br />

2399.8 cde 780.3 bc 16.82 b 40.73 bc 27.245 abcd 22.350 b 15501 ab 1619.5 bc N45K200<br />

2315.3 de 743.2 bc 17.80 ab 39.30 bc 25.580 cd 20.44 b 12823 bc 1572.0 bc N55K150<br />

3044.5 ab 12169.9 a 19.42 a 42.85 b 28.678 ab 22.03 b 11957 bc 1827.8 ab N55K200<br />

2666.0 bcd 827.4 bc 19.10 ab 42.03 bc 27.830 abc 22.32 b 15425 ab 1838.7 ab N65K150<br />

2090.2 e 670.9 c 16.87 b 38.67 c 24.715 d 20.71 b 10067 c 1419.3 c N65K200<br />

of these compounds is done at plants root but<br />

some times they are absorbed by plants leaves.<br />

Even Cyanamid compound which is poisonous for<br />

metabolism reactions can be absorbed by plants<br />

roots, leaves and stems. This compound prevents<br />

catalyses enzyme from activity. In normal<br />

condition, absorbed mineral nitrogen is digested<br />

quickly and changed into organic nitrogen<br />

compounds.<br />

Almost all nitrogenous compounds have fairly<br />

proper mobility, so the first nitrogen deficiency<br />

signal is appeared in old leaves because in<br />

nitrogen shortage status, the nitrogen which was<br />

replaced in old leaves in a shape of protein is<br />

Table 6. Comparison of average interaction effect of year and nitrogen fertilizers for the studied qualities.<br />

Biomass Leaf number Leaf number Treatments<br />

3057.2 a 20.483 a 49.17 35 kgN/ha × first year (2008)<br />

2266.2 b 18.417 ab 43.82 b 45 kgN/ha × first year (2008)<br />

2208.7 bc 18.550 ab 41.80 bc 55 kgN/ha × first year (2008)<br />

1812.8 c 17.417 b 41.15 bc 65 kgN/ha × first year (2008)<br />

3288.2 a 18.133 b 39.87 c 35 kgN/ha × second year (2009)<br />

2950.5 a 16.583 b 39.02 c 45 kgN/ha × second year (2009)<br />

3151.2 a 18.667 ab 40.35 bc 55 kgN/ha × second year (2009)<br />

2943.3 a 18.550 ab 39.54 c 65 kgN/ha × second year (2009)<br />

changed into soluble amino acid molecule under<br />

proteolyses process and transferred to the<br />

required location. Nitrogen is also called base<br />

physiologic fertilizer because increases pH after<br />

consumption and, makes cells acidic contrary to<br />

ammonium. Nitrates ions amplifies making<br />

organic acids in cells. It has been proved that<br />

organic acids quantity will be increased and<br />

decreased by nitrate and ammonium absorption<br />

respectively (Hagh, 1991). Nitrogen effect on<br />

tobacco is more than other elements but<br />

excessive usage of nitrogen increases leaf<br />

nicotine content and these leaves are not valuable<br />

for making cigarette. Additional, nitrogen in soil<br />

near the end of tobacco growth stage results in<br />

lateness of flowering, maturity and harvesting<br />

time. Basically, nitrogen deficiency reduces<br />

tobacco yield. On the other hand adding<br />

excessive nitrogen to the soil increases<br />

undesirable leaves nitrates. Reduction in nitrate<br />

levels of dried leaves would be possible by<br />

optimized management of nitrogen (Zargami,<br />

2006). Adding excessive nitrogen does not have<br />

significant effect on increasing of plant yield and<br />

decreases the quality. Total nitrogen content has<br />

reversed relation with carbohydrates content.<br />

Total nitrogen composes of 75% protein<br />

nitrogen, 10% alkaloids and 15% nitrogen which is


existed in amino acids and other protein compounds<br />

(Ranjbar, 2005). Since a large amount of nitrogen is<br />

absorbed by plants, type of nutrition by nitrogen has a<br />

great impact on plants cation and anion ratio. For<br />

example, feeding plants by ammonium caused less<br />

absorption of other cations but amplifies anions<br />

absorption like phosphates. On the contrary, if plants are<br />

fed by nitrates, more anions will be absorbed<br />

consequently and causes other anions absorption and<br />

amplifies absorption of other cations (Ebrahimi, 2001).<br />

Nitrogen is the most restrictive element agent in crop<br />

production. Some plants like maize require more nitrogen<br />

so it is called heavy consumer. Nitrogen is one of key<br />

components of important molecules likes amino acids,<br />

proteins, nucleic acids and some hormones and<br />

chlorophyll. More symptoms of potassium deficiency<br />

include gradually growth reduction and general yellow<br />

color of plant leaves. Nitrogen is very mobile in plant.<br />

When older leaves get yellow and die, nitrogen would be<br />

translocated from old leaves to the younger ones in<br />

shape of soluble amine and amides (Pooran and<br />

Rahnama, 2000). Nitrogen is a very important element in<br />

growth and evolution of tobacco leaves and crop<br />

improvement which added to the soil in mineral and<br />

organic status. Organic materials in soil act as a hormone<br />

in changing of soil physical factors (Salardini, 2006).<br />

Nitrogen is the main production restrictive factor in most<br />

crop plants and after carbon, its assimilation has great<br />

importance. In majority of plants, the most nitrogen<br />

absorption is done at early quick growth stage and it is<br />

reduced by initiation of oldness and stages (Hagh, 1991).<br />

Nitrogen has more effect on yield and quality of tobacco<br />

compared to other elements. Low amount of nitrogen<br />

reduces yield and makes plant leaves yellowish and<br />

decreases leaves processing in high temperatures. An<br />

excessive nitrogen usage would cause increases yield a<br />

bit but might make mechanical harvesting and processing<br />

more difficult and delay ripening and prolong leaves<br />

processing and lead to more undesirable processed<br />

leaves and decrease of quality consequently.<br />

An excessive quality also stimulates growth of lateral<br />

shoots which is fallowed by more usage of maleik<br />

hydrasid will be exacerbated. Nitrogen leaching ability is<br />

very much and excessive utilization of nitrogen leads to<br />

underground water pollution. More usage of nitrogen<br />

fertilizers results in accumulation of nitrates after<br />

harvesting. This situation could lead to increase of<br />

drinking water pollution (Ranjbar, 2005). One important<br />

effect of nitrogenous fertilizer increase is less storage of<br />

hydrocarbonic materials in plants. The absorbed nitrogen<br />

is rapidly bounded by hydro carbonic materials and uses<br />

them as energy and carbon source for production of<br />

amino acids and protein. As a result, in nitrogen shortage<br />

status, cell walls which contain calcium pektat, cellulosan,<br />

cellulose and legnin could not be built properly.<br />

Meanwhile, cell walls which have been built in this<br />

situation are very big and contain lots of water in their<br />

Farrokh et al. 2607<br />

structures. Since nitrogen exists in many plant cell<br />

compounds like amino acids and nucleic acids, one of the<br />

nitrogen deficiency signals could be slow growth. In the<br />

beginning, potassium moves toward cell wall chambers of<br />

root cortex through mass flow and spread. Afterwards,<br />

potassium moves towards phloem through plasmatic<br />

membrane (Salardini, 2006). In addition to role of<br />

potassium to help plants transferring photosynthesis<br />

productions, it eases nitrogen movement and its<br />

changing into proteins. So potassium functions like<br />

nitrogen pomp and improve potassium abortion and<br />

consumption (Kavoosi, 2002). Potassium is absorbed in a<br />

shape of monovalency (K + ) and found abundantly in cells<br />

but does not have structural roles. Potassium<br />

concentration in phloem is very high. Stomata cells<br />

concentration is even more than potassium concentration<br />

but according to potassium ion is activator of many<br />

enzymes especially those involved in photosynthesis and<br />

respiration. Synthesis of starch and protein is affected by<br />

potassium deficiency. Potassium has very important role<br />

in controlling of plant cell potassium, plant movements<br />

such as opening and closing stomata, suit movement or<br />

daily leaves arrangements. Potassium concentration is<br />

higher in younger organs, roots (Ebrahimi, 2001).<br />

Presence of potassium helps translocation of glucid<br />

materials to different organs and increase crop yield. On<br />

the other hand, potassium enhances plant resistance to<br />

pests and diseases and drought stress and leads to leaf<br />

color uniformity and well burning of tobacco leaves.<br />

Potassium alleviates the negative effects of excessive<br />

nitrogen of soil (Mohsen, 2000). In investigation of soil<br />

and plant and nutrients relations, potassium is very<br />

importance. Potassium forms a great percentage of<br />

earth's crust and minerals existing in soils and plants.<br />

Some plants such as tobacco absorbs potassium more<br />

than 5 times of their weight. Earth’s crust and crop soils<br />

contain around 2.3 and 1.4% K2O respectively which is a<br />

significant quantity compared to other main elements.<br />

Among plant required cations, potassium is the biggest<br />

cation regarding its 1.33 angestrum atomic radius. K-O<br />

bond is not very stable in minerals structure because 8 to<br />

14 molecules surround it. Polar ability of potassium is<br />

more than calcium, magnesium, lithium, sodium and less<br />

than ammonium, rubidium and barium. If other situations<br />

are the same, the more polar ability leads to the more<br />

exchangeable activities (Salardini, 2006). An experiment<br />

was done by 4 different seed levels (200, 300, 400 and<br />

500 mg/m -2 ) and 4 nitrogen amounts on randomized<br />

block design with 3 replications. Up to 400 mg seed per<br />

each meter square did not show any significant decrease<br />

but use of 500 mg seed per each meter square. On the<br />

other hand, using nitrogen up to 30 kg/ha led to linear<br />

increase in leaf area. The lowest number of seedling<br />

(174) and the highest number of seedling (263) obtained<br />

when 200 and 400 mg/m 2 seed was used respectively.<br />

An increase in nitrogen utilization up to 30 kg/ha led to<br />

increase in healthy seedling number. Compound effect of


2608 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

usage of 400 mg/m 2 seed plus 30 kg/ha nitrogen caused<br />

the greatest number of healthy seedling (Tripathi and<br />

Bhattacharya, 1983). In an experiment which was carried<br />

out in Pakistan, 3 different ways of applying fertilizers<br />

were investigated. Using ammonium nitrate led to<br />

relatively better quality of tobacco leaves with low<br />

nicotine and protein content and high amount of<br />

carbohydrate content.<br />

The lowest value of nicotine and total protein in<br />

gathered leaves was seen when fertilizer scattered<br />

superficially (Khan et al., 1981).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Ebrahimi H (2001). Plant physiol. Tehran university publication.<br />

Fajri H (1998). Determining amount of neccary chemical fertilizers for<br />

Virginia and Barly. Tob. Res. Inst.<br />

Gu MH, LI T, Zou K, Wany (1987). Study on the effect on potassium<br />

nutrition in carbon metabolism and quality of flue – cured tobacco.<br />

China.<br />

Hagh PTM (1991). Plant physiol. Guilan University Publication.<br />

Hu HY, Chen LH, Tsal CF (1985). Influence of nitrogen fertilization on<br />

the amino acid composition of tobacco leaves at Various growing<br />

stage. I. Free amino acida. Bull. Taiwan Tob. Res. Inst., 22: 23–40.<br />

Kavoosi, M (2002). Study of intraction effects between nitrogen and<br />

potassium on rice. Rice Res. Inst. Iran.<br />

Khan H, Qazi MZ, Alam M (1981). Effects of different nitrogen sources<br />

and methods of application on the quality of Virginia flue – cured<br />

tobacco. Pak. Tob., – 5 – L, p. 29–32.<br />

Khodabandeh N (1997). Ind. Plant Agron. Publication of Tehran<br />

University.<br />

Lin KZ, He Z (1999). Influence of N and K levels on cytokinin and<br />

abscisic acid levels in flue – cured tobacco. Tob. Res., 25(2): 67–71.<br />

Mohsen ZR (2000). Study of Properties of morpholgical and physiolgical<br />

of six Variety of tobacco. MSC. Agriculture Faculty, Mashhad<br />

University.<br />

Patel BK, Parikh NM, Ghelani LM (1987). Potassium nutrition of bidi<br />

tobacco at Varying stages of growth. Tob. Res., 13: 126–133.<br />

Pooran P, Rahnama A (2000). Plant Physiol. Publication of 16-<br />

Ranjbar CM (2005). Production, to ripen and evaluation of flue cured<br />

tobacco. Rasht Tob. Res. Inst.<br />

Rao KN, Rao BVK (1993). Effect of potash levels and topping on leaf<br />

potassiun, yield and quality in flue – cured tobacco. Indian Journal of<br />

Plant physiology. Cent. Tob. Res. Inst., Rajahmundry – 533 I05,<br />

India.<br />

Sabeti A, Mohammad A (2004). Study of different levels and split of<br />

potassium on quality and quality flue cured tobacco. Master of<br />

Agrology. Ahvaz Azad University.<br />

Salardini AA (2006). Soil Fertil. Tehran University.<br />

Shamel RMT (1995). Study of nitrogen different sources on quantity and<br />

quality yield of tobacco (Coker347). Tob. Res. Inst.<br />

Tripathi SN, Bhattacharya B (1983). Effects of seed rates and nitrogen<br />

levels on growth and number of transplants in tobacco nurseries.<br />

Tob. Res. 9–1. p. 39–44.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2609-2621, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1806<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Vermicompost induced changes in growth and<br />

development of Lilium Asiatic hybrid var. Navona<br />

Ali Reza Ladan Moghadam 1* , Zahra Oraghi Ardebili 2 and Fateme Saidi 3<br />

1 Department of Agriculture, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.<br />

2 Department of Biology, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.<br />

3 Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.<br />

Accepted 17January, 2012<br />

Organic agriculture minimizes the negative effects of agricultural activities. The present study was<br />

carried out in the factorial experiment on the basis of <strong>Complete</strong> Randomized Design (CRD) with 4<br />

treatments and 3 replications. The vermicompost used was prepared using bovine manure and the<br />

earthworm (Eisenia foetida). Applied vermicompost levels were V0 = 0%, V1 = 10%, V2 = 20%, V3 = 30%.<br />

The obtained results from the present research indicated that applied vermicompost especially, at 30%<br />

level had significantly improving effects on the accumulation of macro nutrients, Ca and K, and<br />

micronutrients, Zn and Fe in both stems and root tissues. Applied vermicompost resulted in better<br />

growth and development of vermicompost treated plants as they had higher number of leaves, leaf dry<br />

mass, fresh stem and dry weight, stem height and diameter, root number and length. Observed<br />

increased contents of gibberellic acid in root tissues resulted from the application of vermicompost.<br />

Vermicompost treatments at suitable levels of 20 and 30% had stimulating effects on the number of<br />

flowers and their diameters and reducing effects on time of flowering. The result of the present study<br />

showed that the use of vermicompost, particularly, with a 30% content had favorable results on the<br />

growth and development of the Lilium asiatic hybrid var. Navona.<br />

Key words: Biofertilizer, flowering, Gibberellins, humic acid, ornamental plant.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Nowadays, according to the importance of environmental<br />

issues, more attention is being paid to the substituting of<br />

chemical fertilizers with biological ones (Hu and Barker,<br />

1998). Using the biological fertilizers such as vermicomposts<br />

increases the quality and sustainability, in<br />

addition to preserving of the environment (Kader et al.,<br />

2002). Vermicomposts are produced through interactions<br />

between earthworms and micro-organisms in the<br />

breakdown of organic wastes (Edwards et al., 2010).<br />

Depending on the origin, vermicomposts differ in<br />

chemical composition (Handreck, 1986). Vermicomposts<br />

are finely divided peat-like materials with high porosity,<br />

aeration, drainage, and water-holding capacity (Edwards<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail:<br />

alirezaladanmoghadam@yahoo.com. Tel: +989121789162.<br />

Fax: +982324229969.<br />

and Burrows, 1988). Vermicomposts are usually more<br />

stable than their parent materials with increased<br />

availability of nutrients and improved physio-chemical<br />

and microbiological properties (Edwards and Burrows,<br />

1988; Albanell et al., 1988; Orozco et al., 1996; Atiyeh,<br />

2000). Vermicomposts have the same reported benefits<br />

as conventional composts such as a source of organic<br />

matter, increased moisture-holding capacity, and<br />

enhanced nutrient uptake and plant hormone-like activity<br />

(Tomati et al., 1988; Galli et al., 1990; Atiyeh et al., 2002;<br />

Bachman and Metzger, 2008). Vermicompost is a<br />

sustainable source of macro- and micro-nutrients and<br />

have a considerable potential for improving plant growth<br />

significantly when used as components of horticultural<br />

soils or container media (Sahni et al., 2008). Vermicompost<br />

is formed from pits with lots of pores with high<br />

potential of airing, draining, and water retention which<br />

prepares an optimum condition in soil (Atiyeh et al.,<br />

2001b). Vermicompost in potting media has no detrimental


2610 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

but rather a stimulatory effect on the emergence and root<br />

growth of seedlings and has thus, a considerable<br />

potential for substituting peat in horticultural potting<br />

substrates (Zaller, 2007a, b). Replacing part of the<br />

ground soil by different amounts of vermicomposts with<br />

different origins leads to increased germination, growth<br />

and flowering in laboratory and greenhouse condition in a<br />

vast variety of ornamental plants and vegetables such as<br />

marigold (Atiyeh et al., 2001a), tomato (Atiyeh et al., 2001b)<br />

and pepper (Arancon et al., 2004).<br />

Lilium belongs to the Liliaceae family. Lilies are of<br />

special economic importance because they possess big,<br />

beautiful and attractive flowers. This plant is known as<br />

one of the important bulbous products and has<br />

possessed the 7 th position among the cut flowers of the<br />

world (Varshney et al., 2000).<br />

Despite the proposed enhancing effects of<br />

vermicompost, it is stated that high level of it could have<br />

inhibiting effect on the plant growth and development, this<br />

could be probably due to plant stress by its high soluble<br />

salt concentration (Wang et al., 2010). The results of<br />

some studies indicated that the application of some levels<br />

of vermicompost did not result in significantly increased<br />

plant growth and linear relationship between applied<br />

vermicompost levels and growth and development of<br />

treated plants have not been observed. Atiyeh et al.<br />

(2000) reported that lower concentrations of vermincomposts<br />

(


Table 3. Characteristics of the used water.<br />

Measured indexes<br />

Soil tissue Loam<br />

pH 7.5<br />

EC 0.045 dS m -1<br />

SAR 0.3 meqL -1<br />

LR 0.4 meq L -1<br />

Mg 41 mgL -1<br />

Ca 720 mqL -1<br />

So4<br />

52.836 mgL -1<br />

Cl 14.2 mg L -1<br />

HCo3 -1 164 mg L -1<br />

CO3 -2 0 mg L -1<br />

SAR: Sodium absorbation rate; LR: Leaching<br />

requirement.<br />

weight of stem, number of flowers and some other physiological<br />

characteristics including amount of Fe, Zn, Ca and K of stem and<br />

root, and gibberellins (GA) content of root were measured at the<br />

end of the growth period.<br />

Ash solution was prepared by wet ash method. Determination by<br />

atomic absorption spectroscopy, Varian specter-AA200 was used to<br />

measure the elements, Fe, Zn, Ca and K. Finally, the concentration<br />

of each element was measured per each gram of dry mass.<br />

Gibberellic acid (GA) concentration was measured as previously<br />

described by Shengjie et al. (2008). A solid-phase extraction (SPE)<br />

pre-treatment method was used to concentrate and purify<br />

hormones from plant samples. 1 g of fresh tissue was put in the<br />

solution of methanol, water and acetic acid with a proportion of (30:<br />

70: 1) and the solution was homogenized by homogenizer. The<br />

supernatant was separated with centrifuge and after being placed in<br />

SPE column C18, the solution of ethanol, water, acetic acid with the<br />

proportion of (80: 20: 1) was used. This solution was dried, resolved<br />

in methanol and used for the determination of GA content. The<br />

separation was carried out on a C18 reversed-phase column, using<br />

methanol/water containing 0.2% formic acid (50: 50, v/v) as the<br />

isocratic mobile phase at the flow-rate of 1.0 ml min −1 .<br />

Analysis of variance was performed on all data sets. Duncan test<br />

with a probability of 0.05 was used to show significant differences<br />

between treatments. All data are presented as mean±SE.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The applied vermicompost especially, at 30% level had<br />

significantly improving effects on the accumulation of<br />

macro-nutrients, Ca and K in root and stem tissues<br />

(Figures 1 and 2). The effect of application of<br />

vermicompost on Fe and Zn content of stem tissues was<br />

significant (Figures 3 and 4) where the highest amounts<br />

of them were detected at 30% level of applied treatments.<br />

Applied vermicompost especially, at 20 and 30% had<br />

significantly enhancing effects on the Fe and Zn contents<br />

of root tissues (Figures 3 and 4).<br />

The application of vermicompost especially, at 20 and<br />

30% treatments resulted in significantly increased root<br />

number and length as they shown in Figures 5 and 6.<br />

Application of vermicompost resulted in improved GA<br />

Moghadam et al. 2611<br />

contents of root tissues with the highest observed amount<br />

at 30% treatment (Figure 7).<br />

Based on our results, the effect of vermicompost on the<br />

stem height, diameter and dry weight was significant<br />

(Figures 8, 9 and 10). The highest amounts of them were<br />

found at 30% vermicompost treatment.<br />

All used levels of veremicompost at 10, 20 and 30%<br />

respectively, had significantly enhancing effects on the<br />

number of leaves (Figure 11). The applied treatments of<br />

20 and 30% respectively, had significantly increasing<br />

effects on leaf dry mass (Figure 12).<br />

The stimulating effect of applied vermicompost on the<br />

number of flower was observed only at 30% level of<br />

significance (Figure 14). The results indicated that impact<br />

of vermicompost on flower diameter was significant<br />

(Figure 13). Flower diameter in V2 and V3 treatment<br />

groups was significantly increased (Figure 13). The time<br />

of flowering was significantly reduced by the application<br />

of 30% vermicompost (Figure 15).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The obtained results from the present research indicated<br />

that the applied vermicompost especially, at 30% level of<br />

significance had significantly improving effects on the<br />

accumulation of macro nutrients, Ca and K, and<br />

micronutrients, Zn and Fe in both stem and root tissues.<br />

It could result from vermicompost containing humic acid<br />

and minerals in suitable and available forms and<br />

vermicompost-induced changes in root system and<br />

metabolism.<br />

It is recorded that compared to conventional composts,<br />

vermicompost was 40 to 60% richer in humic compounds<br />

(Dominguez et al., 1997). Humic acid increases nutrient<br />

accumulation in conditions of limited nutrient availability<br />

(David et al., 1994). Treatment with humic acids derived<br />

from vermicompost enhanced growth of tomato and<br />

cucumber (Atiyeh et al., 2002). Treatments with vermincompost<br />

showed increased accumulation of N, P, K, S,<br />

Mn and Fe in chickpea seedlings (Sahni et al., 2008).<br />

Vermicomposts contain nutrients in forms that are readily<br />

taken up by the plants such as nitrates, exchange-able<br />

phosphorus and soluble potassium, calcium, and<br />

magnesium (Edwards and Burrows, 1988; Orozco et al.,<br />

1996; Atiyeh, 2001). The high nitrate content of the<br />

mature vermicompost (Atiyeh, 2001) and presence of<br />

available forms of minerals led to enhanced growth of<br />

tomato plants in vermicompost derived from pig wastes<br />

(Atiyeh et al., 1999).<br />

At the present research, the application of vermincompost<br />

resulted in induced morphological changes of<br />

root and increased GA content of root tissues. The<br />

observed changes in root system could be as a result of<br />

induced hormonal changes, especially, GA, the hormonelike<br />

activities of vermicompost and improved nutrition. In<br />

addition to GA effect on root system, it could affect


2612 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V2 30<br />

Figure 1. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the Ca content of stem and root tissues ( X ±SE)<br />

in Lilium Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

VO 0<br />

V1 10<br />

V2 20<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

(%)<br />

V3 30<br />

Figure 2. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the K content of stem and root tissues<br />

( X ±SE) in Lilium Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.


V0 0 V1 10<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

V2 20 V3 30<br />

Figure 3. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the Fe content of stem and root tissues ( X ± SE) in<br />

Lilium Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 4. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the Zn content of stem and root tissues<br />

( X ± SE) in Lilium Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

Moghadam et al. 2613


2614 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Root (number)<br />

Root length (cm)<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 5. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the root length ( X ± SE) in Lilium Navona.<br />

The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 6. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the number of root ( X ± SE) in Lilium Navona.<br />

The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.


Stem height (cm)<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 7. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the GA content of root tissues ( X ±SE)<br />

in Lilium Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

V0 0 V1 1 0 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 8. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on stem height ( X ±SE) in Lilium Navona. The<br />

vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

Moghadam et al. 2615


2616 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Stem diameter (cm)<br />

Stem Diameter (Cm.)<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

a<br />

V0 0<br />

a<br />

V0 V0 (0%) 0<br />

V1 V1 (10%) 10 V2 (20%) 20 V3 V3 (30%) 30<br />

Vermicompost concenrations<br />

concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 9. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on stem Diameter ( X ±SE) in Lilium Navona. The<br />

vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

V0 0 V1 1 0 V2 2 0 V3 3 0<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure10. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on stem dry mass ( X ±SE) in Lilium<br />

Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

a<br />

b


Leaf (number)<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 11. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the number of leaves ( X ±SE) in<br />

Lilium Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

V0 0<br />

V1 10<br />

V2 20<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Moghadam et al. 2617<br />

V3 30<br />

Figure 12. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the leaf dry mass ( X ±SE) in Lilium Navona.<br />

The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.


2618 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

The diameter of the flower (mm)<br />

V0 0<br />

V1 1 0 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Figure 13. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the flower diameter ( X ±SE) in Lilium<br />

Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

Flower (number)<br />

V0 0<br />

V1 10<br />

V2 20<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

V3 30<br />

Figure 14. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the number of flowers ( X ±SE) in Lilium<br />

Navona. The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.


Flowering (days)<br />

V0 0<br />

V0 0 V1 10 V2 20 V3 30<br />

Vermicompost concentrations (%)<br />

Moghadam et al. 2619<br />

Figure 15. The effect of different levels of vermicompost on the time of flowering ( X ±SE) in Lilium Navona.<br />

The vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replications.<br />

growth and development of shoot tissues. The alteration<br />

in different aspect of cellular metabolisms including<br />

content of phytohormones could be arising from the<br />

different compounds present in the used vermicompost.<br />

It is proposed that the humic acid present in<br />

vermicompost may affect biochemical processes in plants<br />

(Sahni et al., 2008). Applications of vermicompost<br />

significantly increased the contents of vitamin C, phenols<br />

and flavonoids of treated plants (Wang et al., 2010). The<br />

gibberellic acid (GA) is involved in many aspects of<br />

development throughout the life-cycle of higher plants.<br />

They also mediate certain environmental effects on plant<br />

development (Hedden, 1999). Gibberellins (GAs) are<br />

signaling molecules that regulate and integrate developmental<br />

processes during the entire life-cycle of higher<br />

plants, including shoot elongation and root development<br />

(Lange et al., 2005).There is growing evidence for the<br />

presence of root based GA biosynthesis from many plant<br />

species, including pumpkin, pea, Arabidopsis and rice<br />

(Lange et al., 2005). GA biosynthesis and signaling is<br />

limited to the root tip (Kaneko et al., 2003). One of the<br />

highest GA1 expressions was observed in root tips<br />

(Silverstone et al., 1997). Regulation of gibberellin (GA)<br />

biosynthesis by endogenous and environmental stimuli is<br />

an important factor in the control of plant morphogenesis<br />

(Hedden, 1999). It has been shown that GA promotes<br />

root growth in Arabidopsis (Lange et al., 2005). GA<br />

signaling may enable integration of aerial and root<br />

development (Gou et al., 2010). The hormone-like<br />

activities of vermicompost leads to increased rooting, root<br />

biomass, plant growth and development (Edwards, 1983,<br />

Satchell et al., 1984; Edwards et al., 1985; Tomati et al.,<br />

1988; Sainz et al., 1998; Bachman and Metzger, 2008).<br />

Vermicompost shows hormone-like activity and increased<br />

the number of roots, and consequently, improved nutrient<br />

uptake and plant growth and development (Alvarez and<br />

Grigera, 2005). Humic acids isolated from earthworm<br />

compost enhanced root elongation, lateral root<br />

emergence, and H+-ATPase activity of the plasma<br />

membrane of maize roots (Canellas et al., 2002).<br />

The obtained results from the present research<br />

indicated that the application of the used vermicompost<br />

led to better growth and development of vermicompost<br />

treated plants as they were shown with higher number of<br />

leaves, leaf dry mass, fresh stem and dry mass, stem<br />

height and diameter, root number and length. The<br />

increased number of leaves induced by the applied<br />

vermicompost could lead to stimulated photosynthesis<br />

and increased leaf dry mass. Thus, the observed<br />

enhanced growth and development in vermicompost<br />

treated plants, especially, at 20 and 30% level of<br />

significance could result from the improved nutrition,<br />

stimulated rooting, induced changes of metabolic process<br />

and humic acid present in vermicompost.


2620 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

The application of vermicompost increased plant leaf<br />

area, dry matter and total fruit yield in strawberries (Singh<br />

et al., 2008). Sheep-manure vermicompost as a soil<br />

supplement increased plant heights significantly<br />

(Gutiérrez-Miceli et al., 2007). Vermicompost treated<br />

plants had increased leaf area and biomass, especially,<br />

in the 10% vermicompost: soil mix (Warman and<br />

AngLopez, 2010). The enhancement of the marketable<br />

weight, leaf numbers and leaf areas by vermicompost<br />

treatments may be due to the plant growth regulators and<br />

humic acids present in the vermicompost (Wang et al.,<br />

2010).<br />

Study on the effects of different levels of vermicompost<br />

on the time of flowering and flowers revealed that<br />

vermicompost treatments at suitable levels of 20 and<br />

30% respectively, had improving effects on the number of<br />

flowers and their diameter and reducing effects on the<br />

time of flowering. More GA content, enhanced root<br />

system, stimulated development shown by increased<br />

number of leaves, improved photosynthesis which is<br />

concluded from more dry mass, and better nutritional<br />

status due to the applied vermicompost at optimal<br />

concentrations could lead to improved and accelerated<br />

flowering, as it was indicated by induced flower numbers<br />

and reduced time of flowering.<br />

Incorporation of vermicompost of pig manure origin into<br />

germination media up to 20% v/v enhanced shoot and<br />

root mass, leaf area, and shoot: root ratios of both tomato<br />

and French marigold seedlings (Bachman and Metzger,<br />

2008). Enhancement in plant growth was attributed to<br />

modifications in soil structure, access to water, increased<br />

availability of macro and micro nutrient elements,<br />

stimulation of microbial activity, augmentation of the<br />

activities of critical enzymes, or production of plant<br />

growth-promoting substances by micro-organisms (Atiyeh<br />

et al., 2001; Sahni et al., 2008). It is possible that<br />

vermicompost, in a similar way to compost, can affect<br />

plant growth by modifying the physio-chemical and<br />

microbiological characteristics of the plant growth<br />

medium (Sahni et al., 2008). Anwar et al. (2005) stated<br />

that vermicompost not only increases the availability of<br />

nutrient elements needed by plant, but also provides an<br />

optimum condition of growth and availability of nutrients<br />

by improving physical condition and functions of microorganisms.<br />

The enhancement of plant growth by mature<br />

vermicompost may not only be nutritional but may also be<br />

due to its content of biologically-active plant growth<br />

influencing substances (Atiyeh et al., 1999; Arancon et<br />

al., 2004; Warman and AngLopez, 2010). Foliar application<br />

of vermicompost leachates improved the growth<br />

parameters like leaf area and dry weight of strawberry<br />

because of the presence of humic acid (Singh et al.,<br />

2010). The results of the current study matched with the<br />

results of vermicompost effects in red clover, barley<br />

(Krishnamoorthy and Vajrabhiah, 1986), tomato (Zaller,<br />

2007a, b) and papaya (Shivaputra et al., 2004).<br />

However, the best results of the applied vermicompost<br />

were found in V3 group (30%), the observed differences<br />

between V2 (20%) and V3 (30%) treatment groups were<br />

not considerable. As It was proposed that high level of<br />

vermicompost have inhibiting effects on plant growth and<br />

development and the applied vermicompost has high EC,<br />

therefore, it does not seem that the application of 40%<br />

vermicompost would result in better economic results<br />

than that of the 30%. Thus, according to the findings of<br />

the present research, it can be stated that using<br />

vermicomposts up to 30% level, is optimum and<br />

economic to producing Lilium Navona. This level of<br />

vermicompost could be examined for organic planting.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study is supported by the Islamic Azad University,<br />

Garmsar branch. Authors would like to thank Dr. Hamdi,<br />

Dr. Jabbarpoor and Dr. Bugar for their warming help.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Albanell E, Plaixats J, Cabrero T (1988). Chemical changes during<br />

vermicomposting (Eisenia fetida) of sheep manure mixed with cotton<br />

industrial wastes. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 6: 266–269.<br />

Alvarez R, Grigera S (2005). Analysis of soil fertility and management<br />

effects on yields of wheat and corn in the rolling Pampa of Argentina.<br />

J. Agron. Crop Sci., 191: 321-329.<br />

Anwar M, Patra DD, Chand S, Alpesh K, Naqvi AA, Khanuja SPS<br />

(2005). Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth,<br />

herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation, and basil. Commun. Soil<br />

Sci. Plan., 36: 1737-1746.<br />

Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Atiyeh RM, Metzger JD (2004). Effects of<br />

vermicomposts produced from food waste on greenhouse peppers.<br />

Bioresource Technol., 93: 139–144.<br />

Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2000). Influence of<br />

earthworm processed pig manure on the growth and yield of<br />

greenhouse tomatoes. Bioresource Technol., 75: 175-180.<br />

Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2001a). The<br />

influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and<br />

productivity of marigolds. Bioresource Technol., 81: 103–108.<br />

Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S, Metzger JD (2001b). Pig manure<br />

vermicomposts as a component of a horticultural bedding plant<br />

medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth.<br />

Bioresource Technol., 78:11–20.<br />

Atiyeh RM, Lee S, Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Metzger JD (2002). The<br />

influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic<br />

wastes on plant growth. Bioresource Technol., 84:7-14.<br />

Atiyeh RM, Subler S, Edwards CA, Metzger J (1999). Growth of tomato<br />

plants in horticultural media amended with<br />

vermicompost. Pedobiologia, 43: 724-728.<br />

Bachman GR, Metzger JD (2008). Growth of bedding plants in<br />

commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost.<br />

Bioresource Technol., 99: 3155–3161.<br />

Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Okorokova-Façanha AL, Façanha AR (2002).<br />

Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root<br />

elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma membrane H+-<br />

ATPase activity in maize roots. Plant Physiol., 130: 1951–1957.<br />

David PP, Nelson PV, Sanders DC (1994). A humic acid improves<br />

growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. J. Plant Nutr., 17(1):<br />

173–184.<br />

Dominguez J, Edwards CA, Subler S (1997). A comparison of<br />

vermicomposting and composting. BioCycle 38: 57–59.<br />

Edwards CA, Arancon NQ (2004). The use of earthworms in the<br />

breakdown of organic wastes to produce vermicomposts and animal<br />

feed protein. In: Edwards, C.A. (Ed.), Earthworm Ecology second ed<br />

CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl; London; New York; Washington, pp.<br />

345–43.


Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Vasko-Bennett M, Askar A, Keene G (2010).<br />

Effect of aqueous extracts from vermicomposts on attacks by<br />

cucumber beetles (Acalymnavittatum) (Fabr.)on cucumbers and<br />

tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) (L.) on tomatoes. Pedobiologia,<br />

53(2): 141-148.<br />

Edwards CA, Burrows I (1988). The potential of earthworm composts as<br />

plant growth media in Neuhauser, C.A. (Ed.), Earthworms in<br />

Environmental and Waste Management. SPB <strong>Academic</strong> Publishing,<br />

The Hague, the Netherlands, pp: 211-220.<br />

Edwards CA, Burrows I, Fletcher KE, Jones BA (1985). The use of<br />

earthworms for composting farm wastes. In: Gasser, J.K.R. (Ed.),<br />

Composting Agricultural and Other Wastes. Elsevier, London and<br />

New York, pp. 229-241.<br />

Edwards CA (1983). Utilization of earthworm compost as plant growth<br />

media. In: Tomati, U., Grappelli, A. (Eds), Proceedings of<br />

International Symposium on Agricultural and Environmental<br />

Prospects in Earthworm Farming, Rome, Tipolitografia Euromodena,<br />

pp. 57–63.<br />

Galli E, Tomati U, Grappelli A, Di Lena G (1990). Effect of earthworm<br />

casts on protein synthesis in Agaricus-bisporus. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 9:<br />

290–291.<br />

Gou J, Strauss SH, Tsai CJ, Fang K, Chen Y, Jiang X, Busov VB<br />

(2010). Gibberellins regulate lateral root formation in populus through<br />

interactions with auxin and other hormones. Plant Cell, 22: 623–639.<br />

Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Santiago-Borraz J, Molina JAM, Nafate CC, Abud-<br />

Archila M, Llaven MAO, Rincón-Rosales R, Dendooven L (2007).<br />

Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and fruit<br />

quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Bioresource Technol.,<br />

98: 2781–2786.<br />

Handreck KA (1986). Vermicomposts as components of potting media.<br />

BioCycle, 22 (9): 58–62.<br />

Hedden P (1999). Recent advances in gibberellin biosynthesis. J. Exp.<br />

Bot., 50: 334, 553–563.<br />

Hu Y, Barker A (1998). Effects of compost and their combinations with<br />

other materials on nutrient accumulation in tomato leaves. Commun<br />

Soil Sci. Plan, 35: 2809-2823.<br />

Ievinsh G (2011). Vermicompost treatment differentially affects seed<br />

germination, seedling growth and physiological status of vegetable<br />

crop species. Plant Growth Regul., 65(1): 169-181.<br />

Kader MK, Mian H, Hoyue MS (2002). Effects of azotobacter inoculants<br />

on the yield and nitrogen uptake by wheat. J. Biol. Sci., 2:259 – 261.<br />

Kaneko M, Itoh H, Inukai Y, Sakamoto T, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari<br />

M, Matsuoka M (2003). Where do gibberellin biosynthesis and<br />

gibberellin signaling occur in rice plants?. Plant J., 35: 104–115.<br />

Krishnamoorthy RV, Vajrabhiah SN (1986). Biological activity of<br />

earthworm casts: an assessment of plant growth promoter levels in<br />

casts. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 95: 341-351.<br />

Lange T, Kappler J, Fischer A, Frisse A, Padeffke T, Schmidtke S,<br />

Lange M (2005). Gibberellin biosynthesis in developing pumpkin<br />

seedlings. Plant Physiol. 139: 213–223.<br />

Orozco FH, Cegarra J, Trujillo LM, Roig A (1996). Vermicomposting of<br />

coffee pulp using the earthworm Eisenia fetida: effects on C and N<br />

contents and the availability of nutrients. Biol. Fertil. Soils 22: 162-<br />

166.<br />

Reddy MV (1986). The effect of casts of Pheretima alexandri (Beddard)<br />

on the growth of Vinca rosea and Oryza sativa L. Earthworms in<br />

waste and environmental management. In: Edwards, C.A.,<br />

Neuhauser, E.F. (Eds.). SPB <strong>Academic</strong> Publishing, The Hague, The<br />

Netherlands, pp. 241–248.<br />

Sahni S, Sarma BK, Singh DP, Singh HB, Singh KP (2008).<br />

Vermicompost enhances performance of plant growth-promoting<br />

rhizobacteria in Cicer arietinum rhizosphere against Sclerotium rolfsii<br />

and quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Crop Prot.,<br />

27: 369–376.<br />

Sainz MJ, Taboada-Castro MT, Vilarino A (1998). Growth, mineral<br />

nutrition and mycorrhizal colonization of red clover and cucumber<br />

plants grown in a soil amended with composted urban wastes. Plant<br />

Soil, 205: 85-92.<br />

Moghadam et al. 2621<br />

Satchell JE, Martin K, Krishnamoorthy RV (1984). Stimulation of<br />

microbial phosphatase production by earthworm activity. Soil Biol.<br />

Biochem., 16:195-197.<br />

Shengjie Hou, Jiang Zhu, Ding M, Guohua LV (2008). Simultaneous<br />

determination of gibberellic acid, indole-3-acetic acid and abscisic<br />

acid in Wheat extracts by solid-phase extraction and liquid<br />

chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta,<br />

76(4): 798-802.<br />

Shivaputra SS, Patil CP, Swamy GSK, Patil PB (2004). Effect of<br />

vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and vermicompost on drought<br />

tolerance in papaya. Mycorrhiza News, 16: 12-13.<br />

Silverstone AL, Chang CW, Krol E, Sun TP (1997).Developmental<br />

regulation of the gibberellin biosynthetic gene GA1 in Arabidopsis<br />

thaliana. Plant J., 12: 9–19.<br />

Singh R, Gupta RK, Patil RT, Sharma RR, Asrey R, Kumar A, Jangra<br />

KK (2010). Sequential foliar application of vermicompost leachates<br />

improves marketable fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria<br />

ananassa Duch.). Sci. Hortic., 124: 34–39.<br />

Singh R, Sharma RR, Kumar S, Gupta RK, Patil RT (2008).<br />

Vermicompost substitution influences growth, physiological disorders,<br />

fruit yield. Bioresource Technol., 99: 8507–8511.<br />

Tomati U, Grappelli A, Galli E (1988). The hormone-like effect of<br />

earthworm casts on plant growth. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 5:288–294.<br />

Varshney A, Dhan V, Sirivastava PS (2000). A porotocol for in vitro<br />

mass propagation of Lily through liquid stationary culture. In Vitro<br />

Cell. Dev. Biol., 36:383-391.<br />

Wang D, Shi Q, Wang X, Wei M, Hu J, Liu J, Yang F (2010). Influence<br />

of cow manure vermicompost on the growth, metabolite contents,<br />

and antioxidant activities of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris<br />

ssp. chinensis). Biol. Fertil. Soils, 46: 689–696.<br />

Warman PR, AngLopez MJ (2010). Vermicompost derived from<br />

different feedstocks as a plant growth medium. Bioresource Technol.,<br />

101: 4479–4483.<br />

Zaller JG (2007a). Vermicompost as a substitute for peat in potting<br />

media: Effects on germination, biomass allocation, yields and fruit<br />

quality of three tomato varieties. Sci. Hortic., 112: 191-199.<br />

Zaller JG (2007b). Vermicompost in seedling potting media can affect<br />

germination, biomass allocation, yields and fruit quality of three<br />

tomato varieties. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 43:332-336.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2622-2631, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.2060<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Contribution of soil organic carbon levels, different<br />

grazing and converted rangeland on aggregates size<br />

distribution in the rangelands of Kermanshah Province,<br />

Iran<br />

Mohammad Gheitury 1 *, Mohammad Jafary 2 , Hossein Azarnivand 2 , Hossein Arzani 2 , Seyed<br />

Akbar Javady 1 and Mosayeb Heshmati 3<br />

1 Department of Rangeland, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources (FANR), Science and Research Branch,<br />

Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.<br />

2 Faculty of Natural Resources, Tehran University, Iran.<br />

3 Department of Watershed Management, Agriculture and Natural Research Center, Kermanshah, Iran.<br />

Accepted 20 January, 2012<br />

Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) plays a major role in nutrient cycling as the primary sink and source of plant<br />

nutrients, water holding, soil infiltration, soil aggregation and soil health. This study was conducted in<br />

the rangelands of Kermanshah, Iran within five land-use practices including normal rangeland (NR),<br />

overgrazed rangeland (OR), fired rangeland (FR), converted rangeland in rain-fed orchard (CRO) and<br />

converted rangeland in rain-fed (CRR). 57 soil samples were taken from these sites and subjected to<br />

soil samples analyses, especially soil organic carbon (SOC) and aggregate size distribution (ASD).<br />

Results showed that the respective mean SOC in the NR, OR, FR, CRO and CRR include 3.32, 1.16, 1.02,<br />

2.13 and 1.22%. There was significantly (P≤ 0.05%) higher in NR than others. Course aggregate class in<br />

the NR and CRO were significantly (P≤ 0.05%) more than others due to light grazing and higher SOC<br />

while fine aggregate size was found significantly different from each other. Fine aggregate size was<br />

higher in the CRR (20.42 %) and OR (18.40 %) compared to NR. It occurs through, up to down the slope<br />

plough and lower SOC value. The fire and overgrazing are second and third improper activities which<br />

negatively affect SOC and soil aggregation.<br />

Key words: Aggregate size distribution, normal rangeland, soil organic carbon, different grazing, converted<br />

rangeland.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) plays a major role in nutrient<br />

cycling as the primary sink and source of plant nutrients,<br />

water holding, soil infiltration, soil aggregation and soil<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: m_ghatori50@yahoo.com. Tel:<br />

+989188301350. ‏<br />

Abbreviations: CRR, converted rangeland in rain-fed; CRO,<br />

converted rangeland in rain-fed orchard; FR, fired rangeland;<br />

NR, normal rangeland; OR, overgrazed rangeland; SOC, soil<br />

organic carbon.<br />

health (Lal, 1998; Youjun et al., 2007). Due to its multi-<br />

functions, SOC depletion results from both on- and offsite<br />

impacts of land degradation, especially carbon<br />

dioxide (CO2) emission. The CO2 emission contributes to<br />

serious climate changes such as global warming, making<br />

anthropogenic carbon flux a main concern among<br />

relevant experts and decision makers during last and<br />

current decades. There are several sources for CO2<br />

emission such as fossil fuel combustion and agricultural<br />

activities, as well as soil degradation. It is estimated that<br />

CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has been increasing<br />

from 285 ppm at the end of the nineteenth century to


about 366 ppm in 1998 (FAO, 2001). Plant residue is the<br />

main source of SOC in the semi-arid regions which can<br />

enhance macro aggregates (0.25 to 50 mm) of the soil.<br />

Baladok (2000) reported that small micro aggregates<br />

(


2624 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 1. Location of study area (Kermanshah province) in Iran.<br />

grazed rangeland (OR); iii) fired rangeland (FR); iv) converted<br />

rangeland in rain-fed orchard (CRO); and v) converted rangeland in<br />

rain-fed (CRR).<br />

Soil sampling and analyses<br />

57 soil samples were taken from 0 to 20 cm depth during<br />

September to November 2010 in the five land-use patterns as was<br />

described in site selection and land use patterns. The soil samples<br />

were air-dried and sieved through 2 mm mesh for physico-chemical<br />

analyses including particles size distributions, aggregate size<br />

distribution, soil organic carbon, pH, EC and calcite. The<br />

hydrometer method (FAO, 1974) was used for determination of soil<br />

particles size distributions as outlined by Ryan et al. (2001). Soil<br />

aggregate distribution was determined using wet sieving. 50 g soil<br />

(< 5 mm) was subject to soil aggregates analysis. The aggregates<br />

were categorized into five size fractions including very coarse (5.0<br />

to 2.0 mm), coarse (2.0 to 1.0 mm), moderate (1.0 to 0.250 mm),<br />

fine (0.250 to 0.05 mm) and very fine (


Statistical analysis<br />

The statistical analyses including ANOVA and regression carried<br />

out using SPSS software (version 19). Means comparing analysis<br />

was done between soil variables of each site and index site (normal<br />

rangeland) through one-way ANOVA (NSK procedure) at P = 0.05.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Land-use practices properties<br />

Normal rangeland (NR) is characterized by natural<br />

vegetation cover, relatively good condition, light animal<br />

grazing and low soil erosion. Respective elevation<br />

ranges, average slope, main slope direction and mean<br />

annual precipitation are 1500 to 2245 m (above sea<br />

level), 30%, northern aspect and 500 mm. Soil depth in<br />

this site is shallow mainly about 40 cm:<br />

i) Overgrazed rangeland (OR) that suffered livestock<br />

overgrazing, diminishing of desirable plant species such<br />

as Festuca ovina and Medicago sativa (plant biodiversity<br />

reduction), compacted soil due to heavy animal traffic<br />

(through animal’s hooves), high potential of run-off, soil<br />

erosion hazard, especially inter-rill and rill erosions. The<br />

vegetation cover of this is dominated by annual grasses.<br />

Soil is relatively deeper, but stoniness and gravels at the<br />

surface soil are considerable. Average annual<br />

precipitation is 550 mm and minimum and maximum<br />

altitudes above sea level include 1533 to 2153 m with<br />

both northern and southern slope directions.<br />

ii) Fired rangeland (FR) that during last 10 years was<br />

subject to annual fire incidence especially arson fires.<br />

During field verification, it was seen that both vegetation<br />

and surface soil have been negatively affected by fire.<br />

Bare soil and gravels were more apparent than plant<br />

cover. Most parts of biannual and perennials plants were<br />

diminished by fire while annual plants species dominated<br />

in the site. Topographical conditions are almost the same<br />

as OR site.<br />

iii) Converted rangeland in rain-fed orchards (CRO) which<br />

for more than 10 years are planted by almond trees and<br />

vineyards. These areas mainly located in vicinity of<br />

smallholder’s lands. Field survey showed that surface<br />

water is harvested through simple micro catchments for<br />

supplemental irrigation. Average elevation is 1547 m<br />

above sea level and is dominated by northern slope<br />

aspect. The slope steepness varies from 10 to 40%<br />

which is highest in Paveh site and gentle in Ravansar site<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

iv) Converted rangeland in the rain-fed (CRR) that carried<br />

out mainly during recent 10 years. Land-use pattern in<br />

this site characterized by up-down the slope tillage,<br />

annual crops (wheat, barley, and chickpea) cultivation<br />

and low crops yield due to shallow soil depth and hill<br />

slope. It was seen that this site contribute to siltation<br />

problem due to improper tillage practices. It is a common<br />

Gheitury et al. 2625<br />

activity in the western part of Iran which is due to<br />

considerable annual precipitation (about 450 mm/yr)<br />

contributing to soil erosion hazard (inter-rill and rill<br />

erosion) and high runoff coefficient. The distributions of<br />

these sites are shown in Figure 1.<br />

Effects of land-use practices on soil characteristics<br />

Soil organic carbon<br />

Soil organic carbon (SOC) levels in the different land-use<br />

practices are presented in Table 2. Mean level of SOC in<br />

the NR, OR, FR, CRO and CRR are 3.32, 1.16, 1.02,<br />

2.13 and 1.22% respectively. The difference between<br />

minimum and maximum levels of SOC were found as<br />

0.68 and 3.93% in OR and NR, respectively. The ANOVA<br />

analysis of SOC among land-use practices explored that<br />

there were three significant levels of SOC for land-use<br />

practice (P≤ 0.05%). The lower SOC value belong to OR,<br />

FR and CRR while this value in the NR is significantly<br />

higher than others. In addition, this value for CRO was<br />

moderate among these sites (Table 1). The highest level<br />

of SOC in the NR (3.32%) is related to considerable<br />

vegetation cover that was found more than 60% during<br />

field verification as well as low soil erosion hazards. The<br />

study of Schuman et al. (2002) showed that proper<br />

grazing management in the USA enhanced 100 to 300<br />

kg/ha/year soil organic carbon which was up to 600<br />

kg/ha/year for new grasslands. In contrast, fire, heavy<br />

grazing and up-down slope tillage practices resulted in<br />

significant reduction of SOC in FR, OR and CRR sites,<br />

respectively which negatively affect balance between<br />

input and fluxes of SOC.<br />

The effect of different land use type on organic matter<br />

content is dependent on a balance between organic<br />

matter inputs and the degradative effect of the way of<br />

tillage and reaping (Liu et al., 2006). Also, an<br />

investigation by Li et al. (2008) showed that heavy sheep<br />

grazing decreased about 16.5 kg of OC per ha.<br />

Calcite<br />

The respective average level of calcite in CRO, OR, NR,<br />

CRR and FR were 11.76, 13.25, 16.94, 18.37 and<br />

19.66%. The minimum and maximum calcite content<br />

were found in the rain-fed orchard and fired rangeland,<br />

respectively. Statistical analyses showed that there was<br />

no significant difference (P ≤ 0.01%) among all sites for<br />

soil calcite variable (Table 3). It is due to geological<br />

properties which are dominated by calcareous<br />

sedimentary formations. High level of calcite<br />

consequently affects pH that is alkaline in all sites.<br />

Soil pH<br />

As given in Tables 2 and 3, mean soil pH in the study


2626 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Mean, minimum, maximum, SD, CV and Skewness of soil variables of rangeland in Kermanshah province, Iran.<br />

Soil variable Land-use Mean Min. Max. SD CV (%) Skewness<br />

OC (%)<br />

Calcite (%)<br />

pH<br />

EC (dSm -1 )<br />

Aggregate size distribution (%)<br />

2-5 (mm)<br />

1-2 (mm)<br />

0.250-1 (mm)<br />

0.05-0.25 (mm)<br />

>50 (mm)<br />

NR 3.32 1.94 3.93 0.64 0.41 -1.08<br />

OR 1.16 0.68 1.63 0.28 0.08 0.02<br />

FR 1.02 1.14 2.47 0.44 0.19 0.97<br />

CRO 2.13 1.23 3.73 0.81 0.66 0.67<br />

CRR 1.22 0.84 2.01 0.35 0.12 1.02<br />

NR 16.94 3.00 54.80 16.47 271.13 1.24<br />

OR 13.25 3.80 21.70 5.58 31.19 -0.19<br />

FR 19.66 4.00 47.40 15.70 246.57 0.78<br />

CRO 14.99 6.50 48.00 12.08 145.86 2.71<br />

CRR 18.38 6.00 32.50 9.57 91.585 0.31<br />

NR 7.41 7.14 7.79 0.18 0.03 0.71<br />

OR 7.64 7.43 7.90 0.16 0.02 0.44<br />

FR 7.61 7.51 7.78 0.08 0.08 0.69<br />

CRO 7.65 7.47 7.76 0.09 0.09 -0.82<br />

CRR 7.63 7.38 7.82 0.12 0.01 -0.56<br />

NR 0.59 0.40 0.78 0.12 0.01 0.12<br />

OR 0.47 0.29 0.62 0.11 0.01 -0.24<br />

FR 0.59 0.50 0.67 0.06 0.01 -0.20<br />

CRO 0.46 0.30 0.60 0.11 0.01 -0.36<br />

CRR 0.49 0.35 0.71 0.13 0.02 0.96<br />

NR 30.81 11.81 72.23 17.31 299.58 0.96<br />

OR 24.04 15.24 32.83 4.28 18.30 -0.13<br />

FR 30.53 6.20 47.63 12.11 146.66 -0.34<br />

CRO 7.21 0.90 13.16 3.76 14.12 0.06<br />

CRR 7.41 3.46 16.90 3.65 13.35 1.38<br />

NR 13.67 4.80 20.65 5.41 29.26 -0.16<br />

OR 16.01 10.10 19.94 3.07 9.42 -0.41<br />

FR 35.50 15.92 65.58 16.34 266.83 0.41<br />

CRO 18.39 10.82 28.06 6.75 45.52 0.29<br />

CRR 16.43 8.07 23.83 5.35 28.59 -0.26<br />

NR 13.61 3.73 30.14 8.80 77.37 0.71<br />

OR 21.11 13.24 29.02 4.84 23.41 -0.15<br />

FR 40.83 33.57 58.84 7.76 60.14 1.54<br />

CRO 11.92 4.72 27.00 7.50 56.23 1.14<br />

CRR 12.53 5.58 20.02 4.75 22.56 0.35<br />

NR 21.55 7.63 36.60 11.05 122.10 -0.04<br />

OR 22.16 13.52 31.18 6.58 43.24 -0.09<br />

FR 33.15 21.77 53.82 10.94 119.61 0.76<br />

CRO 13.59 2.66 24.64 7.92 62.69 -0.16<br />

CRR 9.55 7.40 18.82 3.40 11.55 2.71<br />

NR 11.80 5.32 21.38 5.44 29.60 0.39<br />

OR 15.29 12.37 21.90 2.95 8.71 1.30<br />

FR 34.37 17.54 58.44 15.20 231.03 0.53<br />

CRO 20.42 9.63 32.53 8.63 74.52 0.06<br />

CRR 18.12 7.35 24.60 5.57 31.04 -0.99


Table 2. Soil EC, pH, calcite, SOC, SPD and aggregate size distribution in different land-use practices of rangeland in Kermanshah province, Iran.<br />

Land-use<br />

Normal rangeland<br />

Overgrazed rangeland<br />

Fired rangeland<br />

Converted rangeland into rain-fed orchard<br />

Gheitury et al. 2627<br />

Ec<br />

(mDm -1 )<br />

pH<br />

Calcite<br />

(%)<br />

SOC 1<br />

(%)<br />

SPD 2 (%)<br />

Sand Silt Clay<br />

2-5<br />

(mm)<br />

Aggregate size distribution (%)<br />

1-2 0.25-1 0.05-0.50 < 0.05<br />

(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)<br />

0.78 7.04 3 3.85 14.2 .51.0 34.8 15.96 20.00 38.35 12.91 12.77<br />

0.4 7.5 3.2 3.84 26.2 55.4 18.4 26.96 22.06 32.16 11.12 7.70<br />

0.75 7.36 3 3.2 11.2 48 40.8 72.23 15.24 6.20 0.90 5.42<br />

0.55 7.73 17 2.66 9.6 51 39.4 19.18 23.79 40.74 6.37 9.92<br />

0.64 7.68 22.5 1.94 9.2 44 46.8 16.55 18.13 35.25 13.16 16.90<br />

0.62 7.45 5 3.74 13.2 44 42.8 52.44 23.12 15.22 3.16 6.06<br />

0.59 7.61 4.5 2.22 11.6 48 40.4 35.45 32.83 20.84 7.35 3.52<br />

0.6 7.76 6.5 3.93 17.6 50 32.4 13.14 22.70 45.22 11.07 7.86<br />

0.52 7.76 6.5 3.89 18 46 36 38.32 25.27 25.86 4.97 5.58<br />

0.48 7.6 8.5 3.7 10 32 58 45.04 24.58 23.10 2.30 4.98<br />

0.75 7.59 14 3.8 22 40 38 11.81 25.46 47.63 7.02 8.08<br />

0.47 7.76 26.5 3.68 24 40 36 14.42 25.77 44.93 7.10 7.79<br />

0.72 7.6 34.8 3.16 19.2 40 40.8 22.28 25.22 36.23 8.73 7.54<br />

0.24 7.17 54.8 3.36 14.8 42.4 42.8 39.61 27.71 21.22 8.00 3.46<br />

0.57 7.21 44.3 2.89 22 33.5 44.5 38.82 28.72 24.97 3.96 3.52<br />

0.38 7.59 20 1.25 3.2 43.4 53.4 11.59 14.44 51.49 10.82 11.65<br />

0.29 7.9 21.7 0.9 2.2 40.4 57.4 4.80 10.10 65.58 11.45 8.07<br />

0.36 7.81 14.5 0.96 1.1 38.4 60.4 20.02 18.76 38.42 11.60 11.20<br />

0.42 7.8 6.75 0.68 1.2 69.6 29.2 7.95 13.76 40.76 18.09 19.44<br />

0.62 7.53 11.2 1.25 3.2 38.4 58.4 11.67 19.94 42.80 14.02 11.57<br />

0.56 7.54 16 1.47 4.2 39.4 56.4 9.68 15.59 40.69 14.92 19.13<br />

0.46 7.43 3.8 1.63 8 36 56 19.21 14.86 19.77 23.99 22.16<br />

0.56 7.48 13.7 1.05 13 27 60 20.65 15.17 15.92 24.42 23.83<br />

0.48 7.6 15.4 1.1 23 29 48 14.86 17.77 20.55 28.06 18.77<br />

0.55 7.7 9.5 1.29 20 43 37 16.23 19.75 19.06 26.49 18.47<br />

0.65 7.51 47.4 1.14 11.2 49.4 39.4 7.01 13.24 41.60 18.13 20.02<br />

0.67 7.56 5.2 1.45 21.2 29.4 49.4 3.73 17.91 58.84 9.58 9.94<br />

0.65 7.52 9.5 1.25 17 34 49 4.94 15.07 38.43 27.00 14.56<br />

0.56 7.59 19 1.21 13.2 38.4 48.4 15.07 20.70 47.48 8.76 7.98<br />

0.63 7.71 40.5 1.49 15.2 46.4 38.4 30.14 25.60 33.95 4.73 5.58<br />

0.59 7.78 33 2.12 17.2 38.8 44 20.25 23.58 37.29 9.65 9.23<br />

0.57 7.56 4 2 9.2 40 50.8 15.13 29.02 38.24 7.09 10.53<br />

0.52 7.66 22 1.56 11.6 43 45.4 23.40 23.68 34.79 4.72 13.40<br />

0.58 7.62 7 2.47 9.6 45 45.4 9.72 22.95 44.08 8.59 14.66<br />

0.5 7.64 9 1.42 11 44 45 6.74 19.36 33.57 20.95 19.38<br />

0.32 7.47 0.5 2.05 4 37.2 58.8 36.60 30.58 21.77 2.66 8.39<br />

0.3 7.6 2.5 2.2 3.6 30 66.4 34.38 31.18 23.70 3.22 7.52<br />

0.51 7.69 1.25 2.51 2 37.2 60.8 32.24 26.39 26.65 4.63 10.08


2628 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 2. Contd.<br />

Converted rangeland into rain-fed crop<br />

0.54 7.71 48 2 24 48 28 19.12 18.70 41.64 13.14 7.40<br />

0.35 7.66 15 0.83 30 26 44 7.63 13.73 53.82 16.83 7.99<br />

0.4 7.61 16.4 0.97 22 30 48 18.27 23.26 26.02 24.64 7.81<br />

0.55 7.68 12.5 1.08 20 31 49 9.10 15.20 41.52 24.04 10.14<br />

0.6 7.76 6.5 3.73 18 50 32 7.70 13.52 42.98 16.98 18.82<br />

0.52 7.76 6.5 3.39 18 46 36 27.38 25.01 23.93 14.57 9.12<br />

0.48 7.6 8.5 2.52 11 32 57 23.05 24.04 29.47 15.17 8.26<br />

0.71 7.48 15.3 1.18 3.2 51 45.8 5.99 17.11 58.44 11.10 7.35<br />

0.45 7.38 8.3 1.22 2.2 49 48.8 6.1 13.12 38.38 19.98 22.42<br />

0.44 7.57 10.2 1.56 5.2 40.4 54.4 5.32 19.64 45.69 11.03 18.33<br />

0.46 7.65 12.5 1.16 3.6 54 42.4 8.74 13.89 54.74 14.25 8.38<br />

0.71 7.66 9 1.39 9.6 54 36.4 6.60 12.97 53.89 11.96 14.58<br />

0.69 7.56 6 2.01 7.2 46 46.8 21.38 21.90 27.96 9.63 19.15<br />

0.43 7.82 31 1.1 12 46 42 16.74 12.96 29.04 20.30 20.95<br />

0.5 7.76 21.5 1.52 15.2 39 45.8 13.02 15.74 25.07 29.07 17.10<br />

0.35 7.64 21.25 0.93 10.4 37 52.6 10.67 12.37 22.57 29.96 24.43<br />

0.4 7.64 21.75 0.84 7.2 44 48.8 19.01 15.08 17.54 28.56 19.80<br />

0.37 7.66 31.25 0.85 5.4 39 55.6 13.64 15.36 18.17 32.53 20.31<br />

0.37 7.7 32.5 0.93 8.4 44 47.6 14.38 13.38 20.92 26.72 24.60<br />

*SOC = soil organic carbon, **SPD = soil particles distribution and ***soil sampling at the top-soil (0 to 20 cm).<br />

Table 3. The ANOVA analyses of soil variables in the different land-use practices of rangeland in Kermanshah province, Iran.<br />

Soil variable<br />

NR<br />

Land-use practice<br />

Sig.<br />

1<br />

OR 2<br />

FR 3<br />

CRO 4 CRC 5<br />

SOC (%) 3.3240 (b) 1.1580 (a) 1.2242 (a) 2.2630 (ab) 1.6110 (a) Calcite (%) 11.7650<br />

0.000<br />

(a) 13.2550 (a) 16.9400 (a) 18.3792 (a) 19.6600 (a) 0.613 (NS)<br />

pH 7.5213 (a) 7.6150 (a) 7.6267 (a) 7.6380 (a) 7.6540 (a) 0.212 (NS)<br />

EC (mDm -1 ) 0.4570 (a) 0.4680 (a) 0.4900 (a) 0.5787 (a) 0.5920 (a) 0.020<br />

Aggregate size distribution (%) 2-5 (mm) 30.814 (b) 13.666 (a) 13.614 (a) 21.547 (b) 11.799 (a) 0.000<br />

1-2 (mm) 24.043 (b) 16.014 (a) 21.111 (b) 22.161 (b) 15.293 (a) 0.000<br />

0.25-1 (mm) 30.528 (a) 35.505 (a) 40.827 (a) 33.151 (a) 34.368 (a) 0.414 (NS)<br />

0.05-0.50 (mm) 7.208 (a) 18.386 (bc) 11.920 (ab) 13.588 (abc) 20.424 (c) 0.000<br />

< 0.05 (mm) 7.407 (a) 16.429 (cd) 12.528 (bc) 9.553 (ab) 18.116 (d) 0.000<br />

1 NR = Normal rangeland, 2 OR = overgrazed rangeland, 3 FR = fired rangeland, 4 CRO = converted rangeland into orchard, 5 CRC = converted rangeland into rain-fed, NS = no<br />

significant.


area is 7.4 indicating the moderate alkaline soil and there<br />

was no significant difference (P ≤ 0.05%) in all the sites.<br />

However, average pH was 7.41 (NR), 7.64 (OR), 7.61<br />

(FR), 7.65 (CRO) and 7.63 (CRR). Alkaline pH value in<br />

Kermanshah Province is related to geological formation<br />

properties which mainly comprise limestone especially in<br />

surface layers. The semi-arid regions of Iran soils are<br />

moderately alkaline with pH value of 7.4 to 8.4 (Marx et<br />

al., 1999; Heshmati et al., 2011).<br />

Soil EC<br />

The minimum and maximum soil EC levels in the different<br />

management practices are 0.45 to 0.78 mDm -1 indicating<br />

low EC in the study area (Table 2). The respective soil<br />

EC for NR, OR, FR, CRO and CRR are 0.59, 0.47, 0.59,<br />

0.46 and 0.49 mDm -1 with no significant difference (P ≤<br />

0.05%) among these land-use practices. This result<br />

showed that susceptibility of these soils to salinity hazard<br />

is low. The soil with low EC (less than 2 dSm -1 ) is<br />

categorized as the non-saline soil whose salinity effects<br />

are mostly negligible (Hazelton and Murphy, 2007).<br />

Aggregate size distribution<br />

Aggregate size distribution including 2.0 to 5.0, 1.0<br />

to 2.0, 0.250 to 1.0, 0.050 to 0.250 and


2630 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

aggregates within each land-use practice and among all<br />

sites is roughly the same as fine aggregates. There is<br />

lowest value for NR while it is highest level in CRR site.<br />

The critical levels (18.12 and 16.43%) occurred through<br />

tillage and animal traffic (animal hooves) affect CRR and<br />

OR. The study by Hevia et al. (2003), in the agricultural<br />

areas of Argentina showed that linear decrease in SOC<br />

correlated with loss of fine soil aggregates due to erosion<br />

in continuous conventionally tilled.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Both soil aggregation and SOC are affected by different<br />

land-use practices in the rangelands of Kermanshah<br />

Province. Although, tillage practice is an illegal activity in<br />

the rangelands of Iran, it contributes to damage soil<br />

physical properties. The CRR activity causes significant<br />

reduction of SOC compared to other land-use practices.<br />

It also negatively influences soil aggregate size<br />

distribution reducing coarse and very coarse aggregates<br />

and adversely enhancing the fine aggregate size.<br />

Furthermore, after tillage practice, fire and overgrazing<br />

are second and third improper activities which negatively<br />

affect both SOC and soil aggregation. It is concluded that<br />

respective proper land-use practices were found in<br />

normal rangelands (characterized by light grazing) where<br />

orchard construction resulted in enhancing the SOC<br />

value as well as course soil aggregate ratio.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

The authors would like to acknowledge Soil conservation<br />

and Watershed Management Institute of Iran, Agricultural<br />

Research and Education Organization of Iran (AREO)<br />

and Department of Watershed Management, Agriculture<br />

and Natural Resources Research Center of Kermanshah,<br />

Iran for financial and technical supports.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Asner GP, Elmore AJ, Olander LP, Martin RE, Harris AT (2004).<br />

Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu.<br />

Rev. Env. Resour., 29: 261–299.<br />

Baladok, JA (2000). Soil Organic Matter. In: Sumner ME (eds)<br />

Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press, New York, pp. B-25-71.<br />

Bertol I, Engel FL, Mafra AL, Bertol OJ, Ritter SR (2007). Phosphorus,<br />

potassium and organic carbon concentrations in run-off water and<br />

sediments under different soil tillage systems during soybean growth.<br />

Soil Tillage Res., 94: 142-150.<br />

Collin ME, Kuehl RJ (2001). Organic Matter Accumulation and Organic<br />

Soil CRC Press, New York.<br />

Conant RT, Paustian K (2001). Potential soil carbon sequestration in<br />

overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles (in<br />

preparation).<br />

Eynard A, Schumacher TE, Lindstrom MJ, Malo DD (2005). Effects of<br />

agricultural management systems on soil organic carbon in<br />

aggregates of Ustolls and Usterts. Soil Tillage Res., 81: 253-263.<br />

FAO (2001). Production Yearbook. Food Agric. Organ., Rome,<br />

Italy.<br />

FAO (1974). The Eupharate Pilot Irrigation Project. Methods of soil<br />

analysis, Gadeb Soil Lab. Food Agric. Organ., Rome.<br />

Gabriels D, Schiettecatte W, Verbist K, Cornelis W (2004). Water<br />

Harvesting in Southeast Tunisia and Soil Water Storage in the Semiarid<br />

Zone of the LoessPlateou of China. In: Thomas S (eds) 2 nd<br />

International Workshop of Combating Desertification: Sustainable<br />

Management of Marginal Drylands. UNESCO-MAB drylands Series<br />

No. 3, Shiraz (Iran), pp. 19-24.<br />

Hazelton P, Murphy B (2007). Interpreting Soil Test Results. CSIRO<br />

Publisher Sydney.<br />

Heshmati M, Arifin A, Shamshuddin J, Majid NM, Ghaituri M (2011).<br />

Factors affecting landslides occurrence in agro-ecological zones in<br />

the Merek catchment, Iran. J. Arid Environ., 75 (2011): 1072e1082.<br />

Hevia GG, Buschiazzo DE, Hepper EN, Urioste AM, Anton EL (2003).<br />

Organic matter in size fractions of soils of the semiarid Argentina.<br />

Effects of climate, soil texture, and management. Geoderma, 116:<br />

265–277.<br />

Jennifer SP, Readw JM, Denslow JS, Guzman SM (2004). Estimating<br />

Soil Carbon Fluxes Following Land-Cover Change: A Test of some<br />

Critical Assumptions for a region in Costa Rica. Global Change Biol.,<br />

10: 170–181.<br />

Jones MB, Donnelly A (2004). Carbon sequestration in temperate<br />

grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and<br />

elevated CO2. New Phytologist, 164: 423-439.<br />

Karlen DL, Tomer MD, Neppel J, Cambardella CA (2008). A preliminary<br />

watershed scale soil quality assessment in north central Iowa, USA.<br />

Soil Tillage Res., 99: 291-299.<br />

Lal R (2004). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change.<br />

Geoderma, 123(1-2): 1-22.<br />

Lal R (1998). Soil Quality and Sustainability. In: Lal R, Blum HW,<br />

Valentine C, Stewart BA (eds) Methods for Assessment of Soil<br />

Degradation. CRC Press, New York, pp. 17-31.<br />

Li C, Hao X, Zhao M, Han GW (2008). Influence of historic sheep<br />

grazing on vegetation and soil properties of a desert steppe in Inner<br />

Mongolia. Agric. Ecosystems Environ., 128: 109-116.<br />

Li GL, Pang XM (2010). Effect of land-use conversion on C and N<br />

distribution in aggregate fractions of soils in the southern Loess<br />

Plateau, China. Land Use Policy, 27: 706-712.<br />

Liu DW, Wang ZM, Zhang B, Song KS, Li XY, Li JP, Li F, Duan HT<br />

(2006). Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of<br />

related factors in croplands of the black soil region, Northeast China.<br />

Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 113: 73-81.<br />

Marx, EX, Hart J, Stevens RG (1999). Soil Test Interpretation Guide<br />

Oregan state University Press, Oregan, USA.<br />

Morgan RPC (2005). Soil Erosion and Conservation. Blackwell<br />

Publisher, Oxford, London.<br />

Morsli B, Mazore M, Arabi M, Mededjel N, Roose E (2006). Influence of<br />

land use, soils, and agricultural practices on erosion, eroded carbon,<br />

and soil carbon stocks at the plot scale in the Mediterranean of<br />

Northern Algeria. In: Roose EJ, Lal R, Bartes B, Stewart BA (eds)<br />

Soil Erosion and Carbon Dynamics. CRC Press, New York.<br />

Nelson RE, Sommers LE (1982). Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and<br />

Organic Matter. In: Keeney DR, Baker DE, Miller RH, Ellis RJ,<br />

Rhoades JD (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. Chemical and<br />

Microbiological Properties. Am. Soc. Agro. Soil Sci. Madison,<br />

Wisconsin, pp. 539-580.<br />

Ryan J, Estefan G, Rashid A (2001). Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory<br />

Manual (2 nd eds) International Center for Agricultural Research in the<br />

Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo.<br />

Schimel DS, Parton WJ, Kittel TGF, Ojima DS, Cole CV (1990).<br />

Grassland biogeochemistry: links to atmospheric processes. Climatic<br />

Change, 17: 13-25.<br />

Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Calderon FJ, Stromberg MR, Scow KM<br />

(2002). Soil microbial community composition and land use history in<br />

cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California. Soil Biol.<br />

Biochem., 34: 1599-1611.<br />

Stromberg MR, Griffin JR (1996). Long-term patterns in coastal<br />

California grasslands in relation to cultivation, gophers and grazing.<br />

Ecological Appl., 6: 1189-1211.<br />

Titi AE (2003). Effects of Tillage on Invertebrates in Soil Ecosystem. In:<br />

Titi AE (eds) Soil Tillage in Agro- ecosystems. CRC Press, New York,<br />

pp. 261-297.


Vacca A, Loddo S, Erra G, Aru A (2000). Soil degradation in Sardinia<br />

(Italy) main factors and process. J. Options Mediterranean’s (Italiy),<br />

A: 413-423.<br />

USDA (2008). Agricultural Research Service, USDA: and Bureau of<br />

Land Management, USDI. http://soils.usda.gov/sqi.<br />

Yan F L, Shi Z H,Li Z X, Cai C F (2008). Estimating interrill soil erosion<br />

from aggregate stability of Ultisols in subtropical China. Soil Tillage<br />

Res., 100 (2008) 34–41.<br />

Gheitury et al. 2631<br />

Youjun H, Qingkui W, Silong W, Xiaojun Y (2007). Characteristics of<br />

Carbon and Nitrogen of Soil Microbial Biomass and Their<br />

Relationships with Soil Nutrients in Cunninghamia lanceolata<br />

Plantations. Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2632-2638, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1206<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino<br />

polysaccharides supplementation on exercise tolerance<br />

and oxidative stress induced by exhaustive exercise<br />

in rats<br />

Hongfang Wang 1 , Changjun Li 2 *, Xiaolan Wu 2 and Xiaojuan Lou 3<br />

1 Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, 411104, China.<br />

2 Huangshan University, No 39, Xihai Road, Tunxi District, Huangshan City, Anhui Province, 245041, China.<br />

3 Donghua University, Shanghai, 200051, China.<br />

Accepted 30 March, 2012<br />

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino<br />

polysaccharides (GPMP) supplementation on exercise tolerance and oxidative stress induced by<br />

exhaustive exercise. Male rats were divided into 5 groups of 10 animals each. The first, second, third<br />

and forth groups designated as PGP treatment group was administered with GPMP of 50, 100, 200 and<br />

400 mg/kg body weight by gavage every day, respectively. The fifth group designated as control group<br />

was administered with the equal volume of distilled water. After 30 days, exhaustive swimming exercise<br />

of rats was performed, and then the exhaustive swimming time, liver glycogen level, antioxidant<br />

enzymes activities and MDA concentrations were determined. Results of the aforementioned study<br />

showed that GPMP supplementation prolonged exhaustive swimming time and improved liver glycogen<br />

reserve, which suggested that GPMP supplementation improved exercise tolerance. Furthermore,<br />

GPMP supplementation could promote increases in the activities of super oxide dismutase (SOD),<br />

catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPH-Px), and reduce MDA concentrations, which suggested<br />

that PGP supplementation reduced oxidative stress induced by exhaustive exercise.<br />

Key words: Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino, polysaccharides, exercise tolerance, oxidative<br />

stress, rat.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makin (botanical<br />

name) or Jiao-gu-lan (Chinese name), a perennial<br />

creeping herb distributed in Japan, Korea, China, and<br />

Southeast Asia, is praised in China as Xian-cao (the herb<br />

of immortality) (Yin et al., 2004). For hundreds of years,<br />

this plant has been regarded as a traditional Chinese<br />

medicine or a folk medicine used for heat clearing,<br />

detoxification, and as an anti-tussive and expectorant for<br />

relieving cough and chronic bronchitis (Zhang and Sun,<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: lichangjunm@yeah.net. Tel:<br />

+86-13905596767. Fax: +86-0559-2546550.<br />

1994; Megalli et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2008). In recent<br />

decades, pharmacological studies have revealed that G.<br />

pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makin has many bioactivities,<br />

including antimicrobia, anti-cancer, anti-aging, antifatigue,<br />

anti-ulcer, hypolipidemic and immuno-modulatory<br />

qualities (Wang et al., 2002; Rujjanawate et al., 2004;<br />

Megalli et al., 2006; Yeo et al., 2008; Srichana et al.,<br />

2011; Schild et al., 2010; Long, 2010). G. pentaphyllum<br />

(Thunb.) Makin contains saponins, polysaccharides,<br />

flavonoids, organic acids and trace elements and other<br />

chemicals (Zhang et al., 2007). To date, its biological<br />

activities are mainly attributed to saponins (triterpene<br />

glycosides or gypenosides) (Kao et al., 2008; Xie et al.,<br />

2010). However, recent studies have suggested that the<br />

polysaccharide from G. pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makin


(GPMP) also exhibit significant bioactivities, including<br />

anti-aging, anti-fatigue and improving immune<br />

competence (Luo and Wang, 2005; Chi et al., 2008; Yang<br />

et al., 2008). In addition, GPMP showed scavenging<br />

activity against superoxide radicals and inhibitory effects<br />

on selfoxidation of 1,2,2-phentriol (Wang and Luo,<br />

2007a), suggesting its potential as an antioxidant.<br />

Exhaustive exercise is often associated with an<br />

increase in the production of free radicals and reactive<br />

oxygen species (ROS) in various tissues, which results in<br />

oxidative stress (Sen et al., 1994; Aguilóet al., 2005;<br />

Morillas-Ruiz et al., 2006). Oxidative stress can induce<br />

adverse effects on health and well being. Even moderate<br />

exercise may increase ROS production exceeding the<br />

capacity of antioxidant defences (Aguiló et al., 2005).<br />

Over the last 30 years, it has been indicated that ROS<br />

can lead to the destruction of tissue and cell<br />

macromolecules such as lipids, proteins and nucleic<br />

acids (Perse et al., 2009; Miyazaki et al., 2001). The<br />

mechanisms implicated in ROS formation during<br />

exhaustive exercise are thought to include catecholamine<br />

autoxidation, the reperfusion of ischemic tissues,<br />

prostanoid metabolism, altered calcium homeostasis, and<br />

mechanical stress (particularly in the case of eccentric<br />

exercise, which has been shown to initiate cytokine<br />

activity, thus, playing a causal role in inflammation (Jówko<br />

et al., 2011). Growing evidence has indicated that<br />

exogenous antioxidants, primarily obtained as nutrients<br />

or nutritional supplements, may help to counteract the<br />

exhaustive exercise-induced oxidative stress (Peake and<br />

Suzuki, 2004; Watson et al., 2005; Gomez-Cabrera et al.,<br />

2006).<br />

GPMP has been reported to be a potential antioxidant<br />

(Wang and Luo, 2007a; Shi et al., 2009). However, the<br />

effects of GPMP supplementation on oxidative stress<br />

induced by exhaustive exercise are still poorly<br />

understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to<br />

investigate the effects of GPMP supplementation on<br />

exercise tolerance and oxidative stress induced by<br />

exhaustive exercise.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Plant materials and reagents<br />

The commercial diagnostic kits of liver glycogen, super oxide<br />

dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPH-<br />

Px) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were purchased from the<br />

Jianchen Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Other chemicals<br />

and biochemicals were of analytical grade and were purchased<br />

from Sigma Chem. Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Changsha<br />

Pharmaceutical Co. (Changsha, China) unless otherwise indicated.<br />

Dried G. pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makin was purchased from the<br />

Huangshan Pharmaceutical Company (Huangshan, China) and<br />

authenticated by Dr. Fang J. Y. A voucher specimen (No. 037009)<br />

was deposited in the herbarium of the Laboratory of Pharmaceutical<br />

Sciences, Huangshan University (Huangshan, China). The<br />

materials were ground separately into powder using a miller before<br />

extraction of the crude polysaccharides.<br />

Li et al. 2633<br />

Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makin polysaccharides<br />

preparation<br />

The G. pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makin powder (250 g) was extracted<br />

with 95% ethanol at 50°C for 6 h, dried, and then extracted with<br />

distilled water at 95°C for 1.5 h twice. After each extraction, the<br />

soluble polymers were separated from residues by Wltration, and<br />

extracts were combined, concentrated and dialyzed against running<br />

water for 48 h. The aforementioned extract was submitted to<br />

graded precipitation with four volumes of ethanol and the mixture<br />

was kept overnight at 4°C to precipitate the polysaccharides. The<br />

precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed successively<br />

with ethanol and ether, and dried at reduced pressure (Wang and<br />

Luo, 2007b). Then, the crude polysaccharides from G. pentaphyllum<br />

(Thunb.) Makin (GPMP) was obtained. The content of<br />

polysaccharide was determined by the phenol-sulphuric acid<br />

method (Dubois et al., 1956) and expressed as glucose<br />

equivalents. The glucose equivalent was 217.4 μg/mg of GPMP.<br />

Animals and grouping<br />

Male rats each weighing 180 to 220 g of Sprague Dawley strain<br />

were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Anhui<br />

Province, China (SPF grade) and acclimated for 1 week. They were<br />

housed in a standard animal facility under controlled environmental<br />

conditions at room temperature of 22 ± 2°C and 12-h light-dark<br />

cycle, and received a standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. All<br />

animal (used in this experiment) handling procedures were<br />

performed in strict accordance with the P. R. China legislation for<br />

the use and care of laboratory animals, with the guidelines<br />

established by Institute for Experimental Animals of Huangshan<br />

University, and were approved by the College committee for animal<br />

experiments. The rats were divided into 5 groups of 10 animals<br />

each. The first, second, third and forth group designated as PGP<br />

treatment group was administered with GPMP of 50, 100, 200 and<br />

400 mg/kg body weight by gavage daily for 30 consecutive days,<br />

respectively. GPMP in the present study were dissolved in a small<br />

amount of distilled water. The fifth group designated as control<br />

group was administered with the equal volume of distilled water by<br />

gavage daily for 30 consecutive days. Body weights were<br />

measured by electronic balance at 0 (pre-trial) and 30 days after<br />

the administration of GPMP.<br />

Exhaustive swimming exercise<br />

Exhaustive swimming exercise was carried out as described in the<br />

literature (Yildiz et al., 2009; Perse et al., 2009). Thirty consecutive<br />

days later, the rats exercised in acrylic plastic pool (90 × 45 × 45<br />

cm) filled with water (28 ± 1°C) to a depth of 37 cm. The rats were<br />

loaded with a steel washer weighing approximately 7% of their body<br />

weight attached to the tails, which forced the rats to maintain<br />

continuous rapid leg movement. The uncoordinated movements<br />

and staying under the water for 10 s without swimming at the<br />

surface were accepted as the exhaustion criteria of the rats<br />

(Dawson and Horvath, 1970). Exhaustive swimming time was<br />

recorded as minute for each rat.<br />

Tissue preparation<br />

All animals were sacrificed by decapitation while under ketaset<br />

anaesthesia (20 mg/kg body weight) immediately at the end of<br />

swimming exercise on the 30th day. The gastrocnemius muscle and<br />

liver tissues were collected. The liver tissue was immediately rinsed<br />

with ice-cold 0.9% NaCl solution, dried with paper towels and<br />

weighed for determining the liver index. Then, all the tissues were


2634 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Body weights (g)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

A<br />

0 days 30 days<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

Groups<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

Figure 1. Effects of GPMP on the body weights and exhaustive swimming time of the rats. Body weights (A) and exhaustive swimming time<br />

(B). Note, values are expressed as means ±SD of ten; *P < 0.05, compared with the fifth (control) group.<br />

refrigerated at -20°C and within 2 h of refrigeration, the tissues were<br />

processed for determining the liver glycogen level, antioxidant<br />

enzymes activities and MDA concentrations in muscle tissue.<br />

Analytical method<br />

The liver glycogen level, SOD, GSH-Px, CAT activities and MDA<br />

concentrations were determined using commercial diagnostic kits<br />

following the manufacturer’s instructions. The liver index as<br />

calculated according to the following formula:<br />

Liver weight (g)<br />

Liver index (LI) = × 100%<br />

Body weight (g)<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

All values were presented as the means ± SD. Statistical<br />

comparisons of the differences were performed using one way<br />

analysis of variance for repeated measures combined with the<br />

Newman-Keuls post hoc test. P values below 0.05 were considered<br />

statistically significant.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Effects of GPMP on the body weights and exhaustive<br />

swimming time of the rats<br />

As shown in Figure 1, the body weights in all GPMP<br />

treatment groups were of no significant difference<br />

compared with the fifth (control) group (P > 0.05) at 0<br />

(pre-trial) and 30 days after the treatment of GPMP, which<br />

meant GPMP had no effect on body weights. After 30<br />

Exhaustive swimming time (min)<br />

B<br />

Group<br />

days of treatment with GPMP, the exhaustive swimming<br />

time was much longer in all GPMP treatment groups<br />

compared with the fifth (control) group (P < 0.05), and the<br />

increase ratios were 21.54% (first group), 29.64%<br />

(second group), 38.32% (third group) and 48.69% (forth<br />

group), respectively.<br />

Effects of GPMP on the liver index and liver glycogen<br />

levels of the rats<br />

As shown in Figure 2, after 30 days of treatment with<br />

GPMP, the liver index in the experimental groups were of<br />

no significant difference compared with the fifth (control)<br />

group (P > 0.05), so GPMP had no significant effect on<br />

the liver index. The liver glycogen levels were much<br />

higher in all GPMP treatment groups compared with the<br />

fifth (control) group (P < 0.05), and the increase ratios<br />

were 27.63% (first group), 39.47% (second group),<br />

47.37% (third group) and 56.58% (forth group),<br />

respectively.<br />

Effects of GPMP on the antioxidant enzymes<br />

activities in muscle tissue of the rats<br />

As shown in Figure 3, the SOD activities of the second,<br />

third and forth groups were significantly higher than that<br />

of the fifth (control) group (15.92, 23.46 and 36.14%<br />

greater, respectively) (P < 0.05), while the first group had<br />

no significant differences (P > 0.05), compared with the<br />

fifth (control) group. The GSH-Px activities were much<br />

higher in all GPMP treatment groups compared with the<br />

*


Liver index (%)<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

A<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

Groups<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

0<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Li et al. 2635<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

Figure 2. Effects of GPMP on the liver index and liver glycogen levels of the rats. liver index (A) and liver glycogen (B). Note, values<br />

are expressed as means ±SD of ten; *P < 0.05, compared with the fifth (control) group.<br />

SOD activity (U/ mg prot)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

A<br />

*<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

CAT activity (U/ mg prot)<br />

*<br />

Group<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

C<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Liver glycogen level (mg/g)<br />

GSH-Px(U/mg prot)<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

*<br />

B<br />

B<br />

*<br />

Group<br />

*<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

Figure 3. Effects of GPMP on the antioxidant enzymes activities in muscle tissue of the rats. SOD (A), GSH-Px (B) and CAT (C).<br />

Note, values are expressed as means ±SD of ten; *P < 0.05, compared with the fifth (control) group.<br />

*<br />

Group<br />

*<br />

Group<br />

*<br />

*


2636 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

MDA concentrations (nmol/mg<br />

prot)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

*<br />

*<br />

* *<br />

First Second Third Forth Fifth<br />

Group<br />

Figure 4. Effects of GPMP on the MDA concentrations in muscle tissue of the rats. Note,<br />

values are expressed as means ±SD of ten; *P < 0.05, compared with the fifth (control)<br />

group.<br />

control group (P < 0.05), and the increase ratios were<br />

19.97% (first group), 25.01% (second group), 33.09%<br />

(third group) and 35.95% (forth group), respectively. The<br />

CAT activities were much higher in all GPMP treatment<br />

groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05), and<br />

the increase ratios were 44.91% (first group), 39.20%<br />

(second group), 39.20% (third group) and 41.82% (forth<br />

group), respectively.<br />

Effects of GPMP on the MDA concentrations in<br />

muscle tissue of the rats<br />

As shown in Figure 4, the MDA concentrations were<br />

much lower in all PGP treatment groups compared with<br />

the control group (P < 0.05), and the decrease ratios<br />

were 19.42% (first group), 39.57% (second group),<br />

46.30% (third group) and 48.69% (forth group),<br />

respectively.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The current study determined the effects of G.<br />

pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino polysaccharides (GPMP)<br />

supplementation on exercise tolerance and oxidative<br />

stress induced by exhaustive exercise. This premise is<br />

based on the fact that recent studies have demonstrated<br />

the antioxidant effects of PGP. Swimming exercise was<br />

chosen as a suitable model since it is a natural behaviour<br />

of rodents. The method causes less mechanical stress<br />

and injury, and leads to a better redistribution of blood<br />

flow among tissues without significant variations in<br />

cardiac output and heart rate which in turn may minimize<br />

the magnitude of injury caused due to the generation of<br />

ROS (Aydin et al., 2007). The present study<br />

demonstrated that the GPMP supplementation prolonged<br />

exhaustive swimming time, which suggested that GPMP<br />

supplementation influenced the performance of<br />

exhaustive exercise and improved exercise tolerance.<br />

Furthermore, GPMP supplementation improved liver<br />

glycogen reserve. It was known that endurance capacity<br />

of body was markedly decreased if the energy was<br />

exhausted. As glycogen was the important resource of<br />

energy during exercise, the increase of glycogen stored<br />

in liver is an advantage to enhance the endurance of the<br />

exercise (Ding et al., 2009). In this study, the<br />

prolongation of the exhaustive swimming time exhibited<br />

by the rats administered with GPMP may be related to<br />

the improvement in the physiological function or the<br />

activation of energy metabolism. Exhaustive exercise is<br />

associated with accelerated generation of reactive<br />

oxygen species (ROS) that results in oxidative stress. To<br />

combat the deleterious effects of ROS, the body has<br />

some complex internal protective mechanisms like<br />

enzymatic defenses, which include primary antioxidative<br />

enzymes like super oxide dismutase (SOD), catalase<br />

(CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPH-Px) and nonenzymatic<br />

defenses like vitamin C, vitamin E, ubiquinol<br />

co-enzyme Q-10 and reduced glutathione (Gupta et al.,<br />

2009). SOD dismutates superoxide radicals to form H2O2<br />

and O2. GPH-Px is an enzyme responsible for reducing<br />

H2O2 or organic hydroperoxides to water and alcohol,<br />

respectively.<br />

CAT catalyses the breakdown of H2O2 to form water<br />

and O2 (Shan et al., 2011). It is known that antioxidant<br />

enzymes exhibit synergistic interactions by protecting<br />

each other from specific free radical attacks (Perse et al.,<br />

2009). The significant decrease in the activities of SOD,<br />

GPH-Px and CAT in the muscle tissue after forced<br />

swimming may be an indication of exercise-induced<br />

oxidative threat (Misra et al., 2009). Malondialdehyde


(MDA) has been the most widely used parameter for<br />

evaluating oxidative damage to lipids, although, it is<br />

known that oxidative damage to amino acids, proteins<br />

and DNA also causes release of MDA. Previous studies<br />

had indicated that exhaustive exercise causes an<br />

increase in MDA and the MDA increasing due to excess<br />

oxygen radical reacting polyunsaturated acid in the<br />

muscle (Misra et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2010). The present<br />

study demonstrated that the GPMP supplementation can<br />

promote increases in the activities of these antioxidant<br />

enzymes (SOD, GPH-Px and CAT) and reduce lipid peroxidation.<br />

These observations suggested that GPMP<br />

supplementation had beneficial effects on attenuating the<br />

oxidative stress induced by exhaustive exercise.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The present study clearly showed that GPMP<br />

supplementation influenced the performance of<br />

exhaustive exercise and improved exercise tolerance.<br />

Moreover, GPMP supplementation could promote<br />

increases in the activities of SOD, GPH-Px and CAT, and<br />

reduce lipid per-oxidation, which suggested that GPMP<br />

supplementation was beneficial in enhancing the<br />

antioxidant status and inhibiting oxidative stress induced<br />

by exhaustive exercise.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Aguiló A, Tauler P, Fuentespina E, Tur JA, Córdova A, Pons A (2005).<br />

Antioxidant response to oxidative stress induced by exhaustive<br />

exercise. Physiol. Behav., 84: 1-7.<br />

Aydin C, Ince E, Koparan S, Cangul IT, Naziroglu M, Ak F (2007).<br />

Protective effects of long term dietary restriction on swimming<br />

exercise-induced oxidative stress in the liver, heart and kidney of rat.<br />

Cell Biochem. Funct., 25: 129-137.<br />

Chi AP, Chen JP, Wang ZZ, Xiong ZY, Li QX (2008). Morphological and<br />

structural characterization of a polysaccharide from Gynostemma<br />

pentaphyllum Makino and its anti-exercise fatigue activity. Carbohy.<br />

Polym., 74: 868-874.<br />

Dawson CA, Horvath SM (1970). Swimming in small laboratory animals.<br />

Med. Sci. Sports, 2: 51-78.<br />

Ding X, Tang K, Lu P, Putheti R (2009). Antifatigue effects of polydatin<br />

from Chinese herb Polygonum Cuspidatum in swimming mice. Afr. J.<br />

Microbiol. Res., 3: 358-361.<br />

Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956).<br />

Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related<br />

substances. Anal. Chem., 28: 350-356.<br />

Gomez-Cabrera MC, Martínez A, Santangelo G, Pallardó FV, Sastre J,<br />

Viña J (2006). Oxidative stress in marathon runners: interest of<br />

antioxidant supplementation. Br. J. Nutr., 1: S31-33.<br />

Gupta C, Gupta PH, Singh B (2009). Effect of Vitamin Supplementation<br />

on Exercise Induced Oxidative Stress in Trained Elite Indian Cyclists.<br />

Am. J. Biomed. Sci., 1: 166-170.<br />

Jówko E, Sacharuk J, Balasińska B, Ostaszewski P, Charmas M,<br />

Charmas R (2011). Green tea extract supplementation gives<br />

protection against exercise-induced oxidative damage in healthy<br />

men. Nutr. Res., 31: 813-821.<br />

Kao TH, Huang SC, Inbaraj BS, Chen BH (2008). Determination of<br />

flavonoids and saponins in Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.)<br />

Makino by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Ana. Chim.<br />

Acta, 626: 200-211.<br />

Liu F, Ren D, Guo DA, Pan Y, Zhang H, Hu P (2008). Method<br />

Li et al. 2637<br />

development for gypenosides fingerprint by high performance liquid<br />

chromatography with diode-array detection and the addition of<br />

internal standar. Chem. Pharm. Bull (Tokyo), 56: 389-393.<br />

Long BB (2010). The effects of gynostemma on sports ability of mice.<br />

Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi, 26: 339-340.<br />

Luo DH, Wang ZJ (2005). Research Advances in polysaccharide of<br />

Gynostemm apentaphyllum Makino. Letters Biotech., 16: 704-705.<br />

Megalli S, Aktan F, Davies NM, Roufogalis BD (2005).<br />

Phytopreventative anti-hyperlipidemic effects of gynostemma<br />

pentaphyllum in rats. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 8: 507-515.<br />

Megalli S, Davies NM, Roufogalis BD (2006). Anti-hyperlipidemic and<br />

hypoglycemic effects of Gynostemma pentaphyllum in the Zucker<br />

fatty rat. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 9(3): 281-291.<br />

Misra DS, Maiti R, Ghosh D (2009). Protection of swimming-induced<br />

oxidative stress in some vital organs by the treatment of composite<br />

extract of Withania somnifera, Ocimum sanctum and Zingiber<br />

officinalis in male rat. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med., 6:<br />

534-543.<br />

Miyazaki H, Oh-ishi S, Ookawara T, Kizaki T, Toshinai K, Ha S, Haga S,<br />

Ji LL, Ohno H (2001). Strenuous endurance training in humans<br />

reduces oxidative stress following exhausting exercise. Eur. J. Appl.<br />

Physiol., 84: 1-6.<br />

Morillas-Ruiz JM, Villegas García JA, López FJ, Vidal-Guevara ML,<br />

Zafrilla P (2006). Effects of polyphenolic antioxidants on exerciseinduced<br />

oxidative stress. Clin. Nutr., 25: 444-453.<br />

Peake J, Suzuki K (2004). Neutrophil activation, antioxidant<br />

supplements and exercise-induced oxidative stress. Exerc. Immunol.<br />

Rev., 10: 129-141.<br />

Perse M, Injac R, Strukelj B, Cerar A (2009). Effects of high-fat mixedlipid<br />

diet and exercise on the antioxidant system in skeletal and<br />

cardiac muscles of rats with colon carcinoma. Pharmacol. Rep., 61:<br />

909-916.<br />

Rujjanawate C, Kanjanapothi D, Amornlerdpison D (2004). The antigastric<br />

ulcer effect of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino.<br />

Phytomedicine, 11: 431-435.<br />

Schild L, Chen BH, Makarov P, Kattengell K, Heinitz K, Keilhoff G<br />

(2010). Selective induction of apoptosis in glioma tumour cells by a<br />

Gynostemma pentaphyllum extract. Phytomedicine, 17: 589-597.<br />

Sen CK, Atalay M, Hänninen O (1994). Exercise-induced oxidative<br />

stress: glutathione supplementation and deficiency. J. Appl. Physiol.,<br />

77: 2177-2187.<br />

Shan X, Zhou J, Ma T, Chai Q (2011). Lycium barbarum<br />

Polysaccharides Reduce Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress. Int. J.<br />

Mol. Sci., 12(2): 1081-1088.<br />

Shi YX, Zhang YY, Jia J (2009). Regulatory effect of gypenosides on the<br />

SOD, NO and mPAP of broiler chickens. Chin. J. Vet. Med., 45: 36-<br />

41.<br />

Srichana D, Taengtip R, Kondo S (2011). Antimicrobial activity of<br />

Gynostemma pentaphyllum extracts against fungi producing aflatoxin<br />

and fumonisin and bacteria causing diarrheal disease. Southeast<br />

Asian J. Trop. Med. Public. Health, 42: 704-710.<br />

Sun L, Shen W, Liu Z, Guan S, Liu J, Ding S (2010). Endurance<br />

exercise causes mitochondrial and oxidative stress in rat liver: effects<br />

of a combination of mitochondrial targeting nutrients. Life Sci., 86: 39-<br />

44.<br />

Wang QF, Chen JC, Hsieh SJ, Cheng CC, Hsu SL (2002). Regulation of<br />

Bcl-2 family molecules and activation of caspase cascade involved in<br />

gypenosides-induced apoptosis in human hepatoma cells. Cancer<br />

Lett., 183: 169-178.<br />

Wang Z. Luo D (2007a). Antioxidant activities of different fractions of<br />

polysaccharide purified from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino.<br />

Carbohy Polym., 1: 54-58.<br />

Wang ZJ, Luo DH (2007b). Antioxidant activities of different fractions of<br />

polysaccharide purified from Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino.<br />

Carbohy. Polym., 68: 54–58.<br />

Watson TA, Callister R, Taylor RD, Sibbritt DW, MacDonald-Wicks LK,<br />

Garg ML (2005). Antioxidant restriction and oxidative stress in shortduration<br />

exhaustive exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 37(1): 63-71.<br />

Xie Z, Liu W, Huang H, Slavin M, Zhao Y, Whent M, Blackford J,<br />

Lutterodt H, Zhou H, Chen P, Wang TT, Wang S, Yu LL (2010).<br />

Chemical Composition of Five Commercial Gynostemma<br />

pentaphyllum Samples and Their Radical Scavenging,


2638 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Antiproliferative, and Anti-inflammatory Properties. J. Agric. Food<br />

Chem., 58: 11243-11249.<br />

Yang X, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Ruan Y (2008). Isolation and characterization<br />

of immunostimulatory polysaccharide from an herb tea, Gynostemma<br />

pentaphyllum Makino. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56: 6905-6909.<br />

Yeo J, Kang YJ, Jeon SM, Jung UJ, Lee MK, Song H, Choi MS (2008).<br />

Potential hypoglycemic effect of an ethanol extract of Gynostemma<br />

pentaphyllum in C57BL/KsJ-db/db mice. J Med Food, 11(4): 709-716.<br />

Yildiz A, Ozdemir E, Gulturk S, Erdal S (2009). The effects of creatine<br />

long-term supplementation on muscle morphology and swimming<br />

performance in rats. J. Sports Sci. Med., 8: 516-522.<br />

Yin F, Hu L, Pan R (2004). Novel dammarane-type glycosides from<br />

Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Chem. Pharm. Bull (Tokyo), 52: 1440-<br />

1444.<br />

Zhang DK, Sun WJ (1994). Studies on the Chemical Constituents of<br />

Gynostemma pentaphyllum Introduced from Japan. J. Chin. Med.<br />

Mat., 2: 45-46.<br />

Zhang YS, Yang JF, Xiao GP, Zhang JX (2007). Extraction conditions<br />

for ginsenoside,flavone,polysaccharide in dry and fresh Gynastemma<br />

pentaphyllum and processing technique of the beverage. J. Fujian<br />

Agric. Forest. Univ., 5: 46-49.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2639-2646, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR10.747<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Climate change and adaptation of small-scale cattle and<br />

sheep farmers<br />

B. Mandleni and F.D. K. Anim*<br />

Department of Agriculture, Animal Health and Human Ecology, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences,<br />

University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Private Bag X6 Florida 1710, South Africa.<br />

Accepted 24 November, 2010<br />

The study was conducted in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa during the period 2005 to 2009<br />

to investigate factors that affected the decision of small-scale farmers who kept cattle and sheep. The<br />

Binary Logistic Regression model was used to investigate farmers’ decision. The results implied that a<br />

large number of socio-economic variables affected the decision of farmers on adaptation to climate<br />

change. It was concluded that the most significant factors affecting climate change and adaptation were<br />

non-farm income, type of weather perceived, livestock ownership, distance to weather stations,<br />

distance to input markets, adaptation strategies and annual average temperature. It was recommended<br />

that a comparison of the decision to adapt to climate change be investigated further in other areas of<br />

similar agro-ecological conditions to ascertain the findings of the study.<br />

Key words: Climate change, small-scale cattle and sheep farming, Binary logistic model.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Several studies have shown significant and alarming<br />

negative impacts of climate change and adaptation of<br />

livestock farmers in different parts of the world (Hassan<br />

and Nhemachena, 2008; Deressa et al., 2005; Kabubo-<br />

Mariara, 2007). Various research findings indicate that<br />

the damaging effects of global temperature is increasing<br />

and most damages are predicted to occur in sub-Saharan<br />

Africa where the region already faces average high<br />

temperatures and low precipitation, frequent droughts<br />

and scarcity of both ground and surface water (IPCC,<br />

2001). In developing countries of Africa, including South<br />

Africa, global warming studies predict that by year 2100,<br />

increase in temperature is estimated to be in the region of<br />

4°C. Previous studies on climate change and adaptation<br />

of livestock farmers have shown that climate change<br />

affects livestock farming directly and indirectly (Kabubo-<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: animfdk@unisa.ac.za. Tel. 011-<br />

471-3231. Fax: 011-471-2260.<br />

Mariara, 2008). Direct effects have been observed to<br />

include retardation of animal growth, low quality animal<br />

products including hides and skins and animal production<br />

in general. Indirect effects have included general decline<br />

in quantity and quality of feedstuffs for example, pasture,<br />

forage, grain severity and distribution of different species<br />

of livestock and other effects such as increase in<br />

livestock diseases and pests. In particular, extreme<br />

temperatures resulting in drought have had devastating<br />

effects on livestock farming and the vulnerable rural poor<br />

have been left with marginal pasture and grazing lands<br />

(Kabubo-Mariara, 2005).<br />

The vulnerability of livestock farming to climate change<br />

is an important concern in the world and in many African<br />

countries and in particular South Africa where many rural<br />

households depend on livestock as a store of wealth.<br />

Over the last decade when global warming was found to<br />

be detrimental to fauna and flora in the world, the relative<br />

contribution of the agricultural sector, including livestock<br />

numbers, had declined. There are studies on the impact<br />

of climate change in agriculture in South Africa and other


2640 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 1. Map of South Africa showing the study area.<br />

developing countries; however, there is limited research<br />

on its impact on livestock production particularly, cattle<br />

and sheep farming. Moreover, few studies have been<br />

undertaken especially at the provincial and district levels<br />

(Hassan and Nhemachena, 2008). This study addresses<br />

the research gaps and examines cattle and sheep<br />

(livestock) farmers’ decision to adapt or not to climate<br />

change in three district municipalities of the Eastern Cape<br />

Province of South Africa. The main objective of this study<br />

was to investigate factors that affected the decisions to<br />

adapt to climate change by small-scale cattle and sheep<br />

farmers in order to guide policy makers on adaptation<br />

decisions.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

This study was based on a cross-sectional household survey data<br />

collected from 500 household heads during the 2005 - 2009 farming<br />

season in three district municipalities in the Eastern Cape of South<br />

Africa namely: Amathole, Chris Hani and Oliver Tambo (Figure 1).<br />

The 500 households surveyed were from the three selected district<br />

municipalities based on representative agro-ecological zones and<br />

livestock farming systems in each municipality. The sample districts<br />

were selected purposefully to cover uniform or homogeneous<br />

characteristics of the three areas, namely: agro ecological zones,<br />

intensity of livestock (cattle and sheep) farming activities, average<br />

annual rainfall and household characteristics. The dependent<br />

variable in the empirical model was the two choices: the decision to<br />

adapt or not adapt, mentioned by households. The 500 households<br />

were proportionally selected according to the information on<br />

household sizes given by the Department of Agriculture and Rural<br />

Development Office. The choice of exogenous variables used in the<br />

analysis was guided by available literature and economic theory.<br />

EMPIRICAL MODEL<br />

The Binary Logistic Regression model (BLR) model was used to<br />

determine cattle and sheep (livestock) farmers’ decision to adapt or<br />

not to climate change. The method has been used by researchers


to analyse similar studies on livestock farmers’ choices in decision<br />

making on the impacts of climate change (Seo et al., 2005). The<br />

main advantage of the BLR over other models of discrete and<br />

limited dependent variables is that it allows the analysis of<br />

decisions across two categories, allowing the determination of<br />

choice of probabilities from different categories. In addition, its<br />

likelihood function, which is globally concave, makes it easy to<br />

compute. However, the main limitation is the independence of<br />

irrelevant alternative properties, which states that the ratio of the<br />

probabilities of choosing any two alternatives is independent of the<br />

attributes of any other alternatives in the available choice selections<br />

(Deressa et al., 2009).<br />

In BLR, a single outcome variable Yi (i=1, ...,n) follows a Bernoulli<br />

probability function that takes on the value 1 with probability Pi and<br />

0 with probability 1-Pi. Pi/1-Pi and is referred to as the odds of an<br />

event occurring. Pi varies over the observations as an inverse<br />

logistic function of a vector Xi, which includes a constant and K<br />

explanatory variables (Greene, 2003). The Bernoulli probability<br />

function can be expressed as:<br />

Yi� Bernoulli ( Yi<br />

/ Pi<br />

)<br />

(1)<br />

or<br />

� Pi<br />

( Yi<br />

� 1)<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�1�<br />

Pi<br />

( Yi<br />

� 1)<br />

�<br />

k<br />

In = In (Odds) =<br />

k<br />

k ik<br />

X � 0 � � �<br />

(2)<br />

�1<br />

Equation (2) above is referred to as the log odds and also the logit<br />

and by taking the antilog of both sides, the model can also be<br />

expressed in odds rather than log odds, that is:<br />

� P ( Y � 1)<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�1�<br />

Pi<br />

( Yi<br />

� 1)<br />

�<br />

i i<br />

Odds = �<br />

or<br />

� �<br />

= e<br />

k<br />

k ik<br />

k<br />

X � �<br />

�1<br />

k<br />

k �<br />

�<br />

exp � � � k ik �<br />

� k�<br />

�<br />

X<br />

0 �<br />

1<br />

� ( 3)<br />

= � � k<br />

�0<br />

�k<br />

X k �0<br />

�k<br />

e * �e<br />

� e * � e<br />

k�1<br />

k<br />

k �1<br />

There are several alternatives to the BLR that might be just as<br />

plausible in a particular case. However, as stated above, the BLR is<br />

comparatively easy from a computational point of view. There are<br />

many tools available which can be used to estimate logistic<br />

regression models but in practice the BLR tends to work fairly well.<br />

If either of the odds or the log odds is known it is easy to figure out<br />

the corresponding probability which can be written as:<br />

'<br />

� odds � � exp( � �<br />

0 � � X )<br />

P �<br />

=<br />

�<br />

�1�<br />

odds�<br />

�<br />

' �<br />

� �1�<br />

exp( � 0 � � X ) �<br />

The unknown α0 is a scalar constant term and β’ is a K x 1 vector<br />

with elements corresponding to the explanatory variables. In this<br />

study, the parameters of the model were estimated by maximum<br />

likelihood. That is, the coefficients that make the observed results<br />

most likely were selected. The likelihood function formed by<br />

X<br />

(5)<br />

(4)<br />

Mandleni and Anim 2641<br />

assuming independence over the observations can be written as:<br />

L(<br />

�<br />

�<br />

n<br />

1�Y<br />

i<br />

Yi<br />

� , ) � Px<br />

( 1�<br />

P<br />

i x )<br />

(6)<br />

i<br />

i�1<br />

To random sample (xi, yi), i=1, 2,...,n, by taking logs and using<br />

equation (2), the log-likelihood simplified to:<br />

n<br />

� 0 , �)]<br />

� ��y( � � �x)<br />

� In(<br />

1�<br />

exp( � � x)<br />

}<br />

i�1<br />

(7)<br />

In[<br />

L(<br />

�<br />

The estimator of unknown parameter α and β can be gained from<br />

the following equations by means of maximum- likelihood<br />

estimation.<br />

�In[<br />

L(<br />

� , �)]<br />

��<br />

0<br />

0<br />

�In[<br />

L(<br />

� , �)]<br />

��<br />

0<br />

0<br />

n<br />

� �<br />

i�1<br />

n<br />

� �<br />

i�1<br />

exp<br />

yi<br />

�<br />

1�<br />

exp<br />

exp<br />

yi<br />

�<br />

1�<br />

exp<br />

�� � �x�<br />

�� � �x�<br />

�� � �x�<br />

�� � �x�<br />

� 0<br />

� 0<br />

Since equations (8) and (9) are non-linear, the maximum likelihood<br />

estimators must be obtained by an iterative process, such as the<br />

Newto-Raphson or Davidson-Flecher-Powell or Berndt-Hall-Hall-<br />

Hausman algorithm (Greene, 2003).<br />

A statistical model based on likelihood ratio (LR) was deemed<br />

appropriate. This ratio was defined as follows:<br />

2( R<br />

U ) LogL<br />

LogL<br />

LR � �<br />

Where LogLu was defined as the log-likelihood for the unrestricted<br />

model and LogLr was the log-likelihood for the model with k<br />

parametric restrictions imposed. The likelihood ratio statistic follows<br />

2<br />

a chi-square ( � ) distribution with k degrees of freedom.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The descriptive statistics of the variables used in the<br />

model are presented in Table 1. The table gives the<br />

mean values, standard deviation and variance of the<br />

dichotomous endogenous variable (adaption and no<br />

adaption) and the exogenous variables used in the binary<br />

logistic model.<br />

Table 2 presents the results of the estimated model.<br />

The estimated model indicated classification rates of<br />

85.4% for no adaptation, 90.6% for adaptation and an<br />

overall classification rate of 88.7%. These results indicate<br />

the degree of accuracy of the model and therefore the<br />

reliability of the resulting estimated coefficients with their<br />

accompanying statistics. From the data, the dependent<br />

variable would explain between 56.5 and 77.4% of the<br />

variation in results as indicated by the diagnostics. The<br />

(8)<br />

(9)


2642 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables used in the analysis.<br />

Variable Mean Std. dev. Variance<br />

Adaptation Yes = 1; No = 0 0.43 0.496 0.246<br />

Primary farm operation Cattle =1; Sheep =2 1.63 0.483 0.233<br />

Access to extension services Yes = 1; No = 0 0.25 0.435 0.189<br />

Total size of farming area (ha) 78.81 250.91 62957.02<br />

Total number of people in household 6.05 3.22 10.39<br />

Age group (yrs) 1= 16 - 24; 2 = 25 - 34 3= 35-49; 4= 50-64, 5= > 65 3.59 0.992 0.984<br />

Gender Male = 1; Female = 2 1.28 0.450 0.203<br />

Non- farm income per annum (R and × 10 3 )1= 16-24; 2 = 25 – 34 3 =<br />

35 - 49; 4 = 50 – 64 5 = > 65<br />

4.70 3.19 10.20<br />

Type of weather during 2005-2009 1 = Drought; 2 = Wind 1.84 0.371 0.137<br />

Temperature during 2005 – 2009 1 = Increased; 2 = Decreased<br />

3=Stayed the same<br />

Livestock production and ownership 1 = Increased; 2 = Decreased 3 =<br />

Numbers stayed the same 4 = n/a<br />

2.39 0.591 0.349<br />

3.79 0.683 0.466<br />

Access to credit 1 = Yes; 2 = No 1.38 0.487 0.237<br />

Access to information on climate 1.80 0.400 0.160<br />

1 = Yes; 2 = No Years of education (yrs) 1.62 0.977 0.954<br />

Distance to weather station Km 26.56 28.91 835.91<br />

Distance to input market (Km ) 24.06 23.00 529.27<br />

Barriers to adaptation 1= Lack of information; 2 = Lackof credit 3=<br />

Shortage of labour; 4= Land tenure system5= Poor grazing land<br />

Adaptation strategies 1= Planted supplementary feed;2 = Plant<br />

windbreaks 3 = Sold livestock; 4 = Different livestock species; 5 =<br />

Vaccination, 6 = Culling; 7= Migration; 8 = Changed to mixed farming<br />

1.35 1.690 2.857<br />

7.16 5.95 35.34<br />

Temperature °C (annual average 2005 - 2009) 12.66 81.26 9.01<br />

District dummy 1= Amatole; 2=Chris Hani; 3= Oliver Tambo Sample<br />

size = 500; Valid N (list wise) = 133<br />

non significance of the goodness of fit indicates that the<br />

model fits the data well.<br />

Primary farm operation had positive effect on<br />

adaptation. The t-value of more than unity also indicated<br />

10% significance of the coefficient. The mean value of<br />

1.63 indicated the presence of more sheep farmers than<br />

cattle in the study area. Judging from the coding of the<br />

variable “Primary farm operation’’ a plausible explanation<br />

of the results is that sheep farmers in the area are able to<br />

adapt to climate change more than cattle farmers.<br />

Access to extension services was positively related to<br />

adaptation. Among the exogenous variables it was the<br />

1.62 1.262 1.594<br />

only variable that had the highest weighting coefficient.<br />

The result indicated that having access to extension<br />

services increased the likelihood of farmers’ adaptation to<br />

climate change. Total size of farm area also had positive<br />

effect on climate change but the likelihood of farmers’<br />

adaptation to climate change varied by only 0.8%. Total<br />

number of people in household was also positively<br />

related to climate change and adaptation but the<br />

coefficient was not statistically significant even at the<br />

10% level of significance. The results implied that large<br />

family sizes increased awareness and use of climate<br />

change and adaptation.


Table 2. Parameter estimates of the binary logistic model of climate change and adaptation.<br />

Mandleni and Anim 2643<br />

Variable β SE Wald df Sig Exp (β)<br />

Primary farm operation 2.583 1.573 2.696 1 0.101 13.237<br />

Access to extension services 34.887 2769.280 0.000 1 0.990 1.417E15<br />

Total size of farming area (ha) 0.008 0.004 3.386 1 0.66 1.008<br />

Total number of people in household 0.044 0.107 0.169 1 0.681 1.045<br />

Age group (yrs) -0.142 0.408 0.122 1 0.727 0.867<br />

Gender -0.372 0.835 0.199 1 0.656 0.689<br />

Non- farm income per annum (R and x 103) -0.559 0.237 5.578 1 0.018 0.572<br />

Type of weather during 2005-2009 -3.418 1.928 3.143 1 0.076 0.033<br />

Temperature during 2005 – 2009 -2.083 1.354 2.367 1 0.124 0.125<br />

Livestock production and ownership 1.350 0.781 2.987 1 0.084 3.857<br />

Access to credit 1.541 1.267 1.479 1 0.224 4.670<br />

Access to information -2.023 2.013 1.010 1 0.315 0.132<br />

Years of education -0.774 0.584 1.754 1 0.185 0.461<br />

Distance to weather station (Km ) -0.088 0.032 7.535 1 0.006 0.916<br />

Distance to input market (Km) 0.061 0.032 3.670 1 0.055 1.063<br />

Barriers to adaptation selections -0.467 0.631 0.549 1 0.459 0.627<br />

Adaptation strategies -0.311 0.164 3.604 1 0.058 0.733<br />

Temperature 0C(annual average 2005-2009) 0.168 0.095 3.141 1 0.076 1.182<br />

District dummy 0.278 0.400 0.484 1 0.487 1.321<br />

Constant 8.692 8.181 1.129 1 0.288 5953.741<br />

Diagnostics Classification Goodness of fit<br />

-2 Log likelihood = 63.279 No adaptation = 85.4% � 2 = 1.234<br />

Cox and Snell R square = 0.565 Adaptation = 90.6% df = 1<br />

Nagelkerke R Square =0.774 Overall = 88.7% Sig. = 0.996<br />

N = 500; Dependent variable = Adaptation Yes = 1; No = 0.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Extensive literature indicates that households with large<br />

sizes tend to embark upon labour intensive technology<br />

(Featherstone and Goodwin, 1993). Alternatively,<br />

research has proved that a large family is mostly inclined<br />

to divert part of its labour force into non-farm activities to<br />

generate more income and reduce consumption<br />

demands (Mano and Nhemachena, 2006). However,<br />

according to Hassan and Nhemachena (2008), the<br />

opportunity cost might be too low in most smallholder<br />

farming systems as off-farm opportunities are difficult to<br />

find in most cases. Households that had large sizes were<br />

therefore expected to have enough labour to take up<br />

adaptation measures in response to climate change<br />

(Hassan and Nhemachena, 2008). The results indicated<br />

that household size increased the probability of adapting<br />

to climate change by 4.4% although the coefficient was<br />

not significant.<br />

As mentioned by Galvin et al. (2001) the influence of<br />

age on farmers’ decision has mixed results. Some<br />

researchers have found negative relationship between<br />

age and farmers’ decision to choice selection (Seo et al.,<br />

2005; Sherlund et al., 2002) while others have found<br />

positive relationships (Imai, 2003; Gbetibouo and<br />

Hassan, 2005). In this study it was hypothesised that old<br />

age would be associated with old farmers who wanted to<br />

maintain the status quo in farming and therefore resisted<br />

change and expected age to be negatively related to<br />

climate change and adaptation measures. The results<br />

suggested that the likelihood of old farmers responding to<br />

climate change and adaptation decreased by 14.2%.<br />

Gender is an important variable in decision taking<br />

among farmers. Bayard et al. (2007) have indicated that<br />

female farmers have been found to be more likely to<br />

adopt natural resource management and conservation<br />

practices than their male counterparts. However, studies<br />

have shown that the variable has no significant value in<br />

decision making process (Bekele and Drake, 2003). In<br />

this study, the results of the analysis indicated a negative<br />

relationship between the decision to adapt to climate<br />

change by farmers and the likelihood decreased by 37.2%.


2644 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

The results showed that non-farm income significantly<br />

affected adaptation choice (P < 5%) and was also a<br />

strong predictor of results. Farm income represents<br />

additional wealth for livestock farmers. Higher income<br />

farmers may however be less risk averse and have<br />

enough access to information. For this reason, non-farm<br />

income showed a negative effect on the likelihood of<br />

adaptation. The results indicated that when livestock<br />

farmers have the option for nonfarm incomes, they can<br />

afford not to adapt to climate change.<br />

Type of weather and the resulting temperature<br />

observed during 2005 and 2009 appeared to be<br />

negatively correlated to climate change and adaptation.<br />

This variable also had significant effect on adaptation (P<br />

< 10%) and a relatively high predictor among the<br />

independent variables. Households with windy and higher<br />

temperatures over the survey period were less likely to<br />

adapt to climate change through adoption of different<br />

practices. Furthermore, households who perceived great<br />

differences in seasonal temperatures during the survey<br />

period were less likely to adapt to climate change.<br />

Empirical studies on the impact of climate change on<br />

agriculture indicated that climate attributes significantly<br />

affect net farm income and reduced adaptation (Mano<br />

and Nhemachena, 2006).<br />

As expected, livestock production and ownership<br />

positively affected climate change and adaptation with<br />

high marginal impact. The variable also had significant<br />

effect on adaptation (P < 10%). Livestock ownership<br />

plays a major role as a store of wealth in the households<br />

and also provides traction and manure required for<br />

grazing maintenance. Thus in this study the variable was<br />

hypothesised to have an increase in the likelihood of<br />

climate change and adaptation of farmers (Smith et al.,<br />

2001).<br />

Access to credit had a positive impact on climate<br />

change and adaptation. Having access to credit<br />

increased the likelihood of adaptation by farmers. The<br />

results implied that institutional support in terms of the<br />

provision of credit was an important factor in promoting<br />

adaptation options to reduce the negative effects of<br />

climate change (Deressa et al., 2009). Several studies<br />

have shown that access to credit by farmers is an<br />

important determinant of the adoption of various<br />

technologies (Kandlinkar and Risbey, 2000). In this study<br />

it was hypothesised that the availability of credit to<br />

livestock farmers would be positively related to climate<br />

change and adaptation. Access to credit has been found<br />

to assist farmers to pay for information on agriculture. In<br />

this study such farmers were assumed to have been able<br />

to make comparative decisions on climate change and<br />

adaptation. Availability of financial resources would<br />

enable farmers to buy new breeds of livestock and other<br />

important inputs that they may require for the adaptation<br />

choices. The results suggested that access to information<br />

and years of education had negative impacts on famers’<br />

likelihood to adapt to climate change. Education has<br />

been found to be negatively correlated with farmers’<br />

decisions on climate change and adaptation measures<br />

(Gould et al., 1989) while access to information has been<br />

found to have mixed impacts on the decision making of<br />

farmers (Dolisca et al., 2006).<br />

Distance to weather station had a negative but<br />

significant (P < 1%) impact on adaptation. The results<br />

from this study indicated that long distances decreased<br />

the likelihood of adaptation by 8.8%. Distance to input<br />

markets was also positively and significantly (P < 10%)<br />

related to adaptation choices. Market access has been<br />

found to be an important factor in determining technology<br />

adoption choices among farmers (Luseno et al., 2003).<br />

Access to input markets allowed farmers to acquire<br />

inputs needed for adaptation choices such as planting of<br />

supplementary feed, windbreaks, purchase of new<br />

livestock species, vaccination etc. Zhang and Flick<br />

(2001) however, found that long distances to input<br />

markets decreased the likelihood of adaptation.<br />

The presence of barriers to adaptation had negative<br />

impact on adaptation. Choice of adaptation strategies<br />

had negative and significant (P < 10%) effect on<br />

adaptation indicating that households with proper choices<br />

of adaptation strategies needed not to adapt to climate<br />

change. Farmers who perceived higher annual mean<br />

temperatures over the survey period were more likely to<br />

adapt to climate change. The variable was also<br />

significant (P < 10%) determinant of the likelihood of<br />

adaptation. The results showed that a rise in temperature<br />

1°C higher than the mean increased the likelihood of<br />

adaptation by 16.8%. The results indicated that with more<br />

warming, farmers would employ various adaptation<br />

measures to compensate for the loss of water associated<br />

with increased temperatures (Deressa et al., 2009).<br />

Differences in agro-ecological zones in the three district<br />

municipalities had positive influence on adaptation<br />

decisions of farmers. Empirical studies on climate change<br />

and adaptation of farmers in Africa have shown that<br />

climate attributes in different agricultural zones<br />

significantly affected adaptation (Kurukulasuriya and<br />

Mendelsohn, 2006). Regional studies have also shown<br />

that the choice of livestock species is sensitive to climate<br />

change (Seo et al., 2005).<br />

SUMMARY<br />

This study examined small-scale cattle and sheep<br />

(livestock) farmers’ decision to adapt to climate change in<br />

three district municipalities of the Eastern Cape Province<br />

of South Africa. The main objective was to investigate<br />

factors that affected the decisions to adapt to climate<br />

change by small-scale livestock farmers. The study was


ased on a cross-sectional household survey data<br />

collected from 500 household heads during the 2005 -<br />

2009 farming season. The Binary Logistic Regression<br />

Model was used to determine livestock farmers’ decision<br />

to adapt or not to climate change.<br />

The results indicated that primary farm operation had<br />

positive effect on adaptation decision. A plausible<br />

explanation for the results was that the predominant<br />

sheep farmers in the area were able to adapt to climate<br />

change more than cattle farmers. Access to extension<br />

services was positively related to climate change and had<br />

the highest weighting coefficient. From the results it was<br />

concluded that having access to extension services<br />

increased the likelihood of adaptation to climate. Total<br />

size of farm area also had positive effect on climate<br />

change but the likelihood of farmers’ adaptation to<br />

climate change varied by only 0.8%. Total number of<br />

people in household was positively related to climate<br />

change and adaptation and the coefficient was not<br />

statistically significant. The results implied that large<br />

family sizes increased awareness of climate change and<br />

adaptation.<br />

From the results of the study it was suggested that<br />

household size increased the probability of farmers<br />

adapting to climate change. Also that the likelihood of old<br />

farmers responding to climate change and adaptation<br />

decreased by 14.2%. The results of the analysis<br />

indicated a negative relationship between gender and the<br />

decision in adapting to climate change by farmers and<br />

the likelihood decreased by 37.2%. Households who<br />

perceived great differences in seasonal temperatures<br />

during the survey period were less likely to adapt to<br />

climate change.<br />

Differences in agro-ecological zones in the three district<br />

municipalities had positive influence on adaptation<br />

decisions of farmers. This study confirms other empirical<br />

studies on climate change and adaptation of farmers in<br />

Africa that have shown that climate change in different<br />

agricultural zones significantly affected adaptation. The<br />

study also confirmed other regional studies that have also<br />

shown that the choice of livestock species is sensitive to<br />

climate change.<br />

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

In this study the most significant factors that affected<br />

climate change and adaptation were non-farm income,<br />

type of weather perceived, livestock production and<br />

ownership, distance to weather stations, distance to input<br />

markets, adaptation strategies and annual average<br />

temperature. Non-farm income significantly affected<br />

adaptation. From this it was concluded that households<br />

with non farm income could afford not to adapt to climate<br />

change because of other sources of income that they<br />

Mandleni and Anim 2645<br />

had. Type of weather and temperature perceived by the<br />

households during the period of study were negatively<br />

related to climate change and adaptation. Households<br />

that experienced windy and higher temperatures over the<br />

period of survey were less likely to adapt to climate<br />

change. The conclusion is that those households did not<br />

see the need to adapt to climate change.<br />

Livestock production and ownership positively affected<br />

adaptation with high marginal impact. This variable also<br />

had significant effect on adaptation. Distance to weather<br />

station had a negative but significant impact on<br />

adaptation. Conclusions were that long distances to<br />

weather stations decreased the likelihood of adaptation.<br />

Distance to input markets were also positively and<br />

significantly related to adaptation choices. Choice of<br />

adaptation strategies had negative and significant effect<br />

on adaptation indicating that households with proper<br />

choices of adaptation strategies needed not to adapt to<br />

climate change. Farmers who perceived higher annual<br />

mean temperatures over the survey period were more<br />

likely to adapt to climate change. This variable was also a<br />

significant determinant of the likelihood to adapt. From<br />

the results it was concluded that with more climate<br />

warming, farmers would employ various adaptation<br />

measures to compensate for the loss of water associated<br />

with increased temperatures. It was therefore<br />

recommended that a comparison of adaptation to climate<br />

change by small-scale livestock farmers be investigated<br />

in other areas of similar agro-ecological conditions to<br />

confirm the outcome of this study.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bayard B, Jolly CM, Shannon DA (2007). The economics of adoption<br />

and management of alley cropping in Haiti. J. Environ. Manage., 85:<br />

62-70.<br />

Bekele W, Drake L (2003). Soil and water conservation decision<br />

behavior of subsistence farmers in Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: a<br />

case study of the Hunde-lafto area. Ecolo. Econ., 46: 437-451.<br />

Dolisca F, Carter RD, Mcdaniel JM, Shannon DA, Jolly CM (2006).<br />

Factors affecting farmers participation in forestry management<br />

programs: A case study from Haiti. For. Ecol. Manage, 236: 324-331.<br />

Deressa T, Hassan R, Poonyth D (2005). Measuring the economic<br />

impact of climate change on South Africa’s sugarcane growing<br />

regions. Agrekon, 44(4): 524-542.<br />

Deressa TT, Hassan RN, Ringler C, Alemu T, Yesuf M (2009).<br />

Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate<br />

change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Glob. Environ. Change, 19: 248-<br />

255.<br />

Featherstone AM, Goodwin BK (1993). Factors influencing a farmer’s<br />

decision to invest in long-term conservation improvements. Land<br />

Econ., 69: 67-81.<br />

Greene WH (2003). Econometric analysis. Fifth edition. Prentice Hall,<br />

New Jersey. Gould, B.W, Saupe, WE, Klemme RM (1989).<br />

Conservation tillage: the role of farm and operator characteristics and<br />

the perception of soil erosion. Land Econ., 5: 167-182.<br />

Galvin KA, Boone RB, Smith NM, Lynn SJ (2001). Impacts of climate<br />

variability on East African pastoralists: Linking social science and<br />

remote sensing. Clim. Res., 19(1): 161-172.


2646 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Gbetibouo G, Hassan R (2005). Economic impact of climate change on<br />

major South African field crops: A Ricardian approach. Glob. Planet.<br />

Change, 47: 143-152.<br />

Hassan R, Nhemachena C (2008). Determinants of African farmers’<br />

strategies for adaptation to climate change: Multinomial choice<br />

analysis. Afr. J. Agric. Res. Econ., p. 2.<br />

Imai K (2003). Is livestock important for risk behaviour and activity<br />

choice in rural households? Evidence from Kenya. J. Afr. Econ., 12:<br />

271-295.<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2001. Climate<br />

Change: The scientific basis. New York: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Kabubo-Mariara J (2008). Climate change adaptation and livestock<br />

activity choices in Kenya: An economic analysis. Nat. Resour.<br />

Forum, 32: 131-141.<br />

Kabubo-Mariar, J (2005). Herders response to acute land pressure<br />

under changing property rights: Some insights from Kenya. Environ.<br />

Dev. Econ., 10(1): 67-85.<br />

Kabubo-Mariara J ( 2007). Poverty and rural livelihoods in Kenya:<br />

Evidence from a semi-arid region. In: Tisdell, C. (Ed.) Poverty,<br />

Poverty Alleviation and Social Disadvantage: Analysis, Case Studies<br />

and Policies. Serials Publications, 3(7): 56.<br />

Kandlinkar M, Risbey J (2000). Agricultural impacts of climate change:<br />

If adaptation is the answer, what is the question? Clim. Change, 45:<br />

529-539.<br />

Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R (2006). Crop selection: adaptation to<br />

climate change in Africa. CEEPA Discussion Paper No. 26. Centre<br />

for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa, University of<br />

Pretoria, Pretoria.<br />

Luseno WK, Mcpeak JG, Barrett CB, Little D, Gebru G (2003).<br />

Assessing the value of climate forecast information for pastoralists:<br />

Evidence from Southern Ethiopia and Northern Kenya. World Dev.,<br />

31(9): 1477-1494.<br />

Mano R, Nhemachena C (2006). Assessment of the economic impacts<br />

of climate change on agriculture in Zimbabwe: A Ricardian approach.<br />

CEEPA Discussion Paper No. 11.<br />

Sherlund SM, Barrett CB, Adesina AA (2002). Smallholder technical<br />

efficiency controlling for environmental production conditions. J. Dev.<br />

Econ., 69(1): 85-101.<br />

Smith K, Barrett CB, Box PW (2001). Not necessarily in the same boat:<br />

Heterogeneous risk assessment among East African pastoralists. J.<br />

Dev. Stud., 37(5): 1-30.<br />

Seo SN, Mendelsohn R, Munasinghe M (2005). Climate change and<br />

agriculture in Sri Lanka. Environ. Dev. Econ., 10: 581-596.<br />

Zhang D, Flick W (2001). Sticks, carrots, and reforestation investment.<br />

Land Econ., 77(3): 443-56.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2647-2652, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1689<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Village chicken production practices in the Amatola<br />

Basin of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa<br />

N. M. B. Nyoni 1 and P. J. Masika 2 *<br />

1 Department of Livestock and Pasture Sciences, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa.<br />

2 Agricultural and Rural Development Research Institute, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare,<br />

P/Bag X 1314, Alice 5700. South Africa.<br />

Accepted 16 February, 2012<br />

A majority of rural households in South Africa-own village chickens which contribute significantly to<br />

their livelihoods, yet, there is dearth of information on production practices of this enterprise. Thus, this<br />

study was conducted to determine the village chicken production practices in the Amatola Basin of the<br />

Eastern Cape Province. Data were gathered using a questionnaire survey of 81 households. They were<br />

identified from seven villages using snowball’s sampling technique. Village chickens were mostly<br />

(60.5%; n = 49) owned by women and mainly raised to meet household food requirements. Some<br />

farmers (28.4%; n = 23) also occasionally sold their chickens to neighbours at an average of R50<br />

(USD7.55) per bird. Most chicken flocks (96.3%; n = 78) were provided with supplementary feeds and<br />

drinking water. Majority (93.8%; n = 76) of their households also provided some form of shelter for their<br />

chickens. Although, most respondents (93.8%; n = 76) confirmed the use of alternative remedies to<br />

control parasites and treat diseases; most chicken keepers (81.5%; n = 66) experienced chicken losses<br />

due to predation and health related problems. Since this study was limited to the documentation of<br />

village chicken production, there is the need for a further research to ascertain the extent to which<br />

chicken management practices and environmental variables affect village chicken production in this<br />

area.<br />

Key words: Ethno-veterinary medicines, free-range, resource-limited farmers, rural, scavenging chickens.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Poultry production is an important agricultural activity for<br />

most rural communities in Africa. It provides rural<br />

households with scarce animal protein in the form of<br />

meat and eggs as well as being a reliable source of petty<br />

cash (Kalita et al., 2004; McAinsh et al., 2004; Njenga,<br />

2005). Rural poultry have also been reported to be used<br />

for traditional ceremonies and festivals in some cultures<br />

(Alders et al., 2007), hence, they contribute significantly<br />

to the livelihoods of the most vulnerable rural households<br />

in developing countries (Mack et al., 2005).<br />

It is estimated that up to 70% of poultry products in the<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: pmasika@ufh.ac.za. Fax: +27<br />

40 602 2583. Tel: +27 40 602 2317, +27 40 653 1154.<br />

developing world are produced by resource-limited<br />

farmers and in family-managed poultry systems (Sonaiya,<br />

2000), of which 80% are found in rural areas under the<br />

free range system (Alders and Spradbrow, 2001).<br />

However, rural poultry production is not rated high in the<br />

mainstream of national economies because of the lack of<br />

measurable indicators of output (Alders and Spradbrow,<br />

2001). Productivity levels of rural poultry in many African<br />

countries fall far below desirable levels. Output in terms<br />

of number of eggs per hen per year and flock sizes are<br />

low with relatively high mortality rates when compared to<br />

commercial poultry production (Gondwe and Wolly, 2007;<br />

Mapiye et al., 2008). Due to the low value resourcelimited<br />

farmers attached to poultry in relation to other<br />

livestock, farmers often are ignorant of small changes<br />

that could enhance the quality, health and productivity of


2648 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Other livestock owned by Amatola basin village chicken<br />

farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.<br />

Livestock Ownership % (n)<br />

Cattle and goats 27.2 (22)<br />

Cattle, goats and pigs 16.1 (13)<br />

Cattle, goats, pigs and sheep 7.4 (6)<br />

Pigs 4.9 (4)<br />

Cattle 4.9 (4)<br />

Goats 3.7 (3)<br />

Other poultry (geese and ducks) 4.9 (4)<br />

their flocks (Acavomic et al., 2005). An extra effort in the<br />

management of poultry housing, feeding, and animal<br />

health care will increase village chicken productivity<br />

significantly (Sonaiya, 2007). Furthermore, strategic<br />

increases in the production of rural poultry flocks will<br />

greatly assist in addressing the challenge of fighting<br />

poverty and malnutrition (Sonaiya, 2007; Gillespie and<br />

Flanders, 2009).<br />

Although, other poultry species which include ducks,<br />

turkeys, guinea fowl, quail, and pigeons are important in<br />

village systems; village chickens are the most important<br />

and major poultry species (Acamovic et al., 2005).<br />

Research on indigenous knowledge and associated<br />

traditional production practices of village chicken is<br />

limited in South Africa and yet in principle, this system<br />

contributes to the lives of many rural people (Swatson et<br />

al., 2002). Although, some studies have been conducted<br />

in the Limpopo and Kwa-Zulu Natal Provinces, the fact<br />

that village chicken production varies from area to area<br />

depending on the socio-economic, cultural and biological<br />

factors (Muchadeyi et al., 2007), makes an investigation<br />

imperative in the Eastern Cape Province. This will<br />

broaden the understanding of the significance of village<br />

chickens in the study area and also outline the<br />

challenges that farmers face. The main objective of this<br />

study, therefore, was to determine the village chicken<br />

production practices.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Study area<br />

The study was conducted in the Amatola basin of the Amathole<br />

district situated in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Out<br />

of 13 villages, 7 were randomly selected to participate in the study.<br />

Consequently, about 30% of the households were sampled per<br />

village. The area has an altitude of 1 807 m above sea level, and<br />

lies within latitude 32°31.00 -32º 45.00 S and longi tude of 26°57.00-<br />

27º02.00 E on the Eastern slopes of the Amatola mountain range.<br />

The winter season temperatures range from 7 to 20ºC, while<br />

summer temperatures range from 16 to 31ºC. The Amatola basin<br />

receives an average annual rainfall of about 580 to 800 mm (ISCW,<br />

2008).<br />

Sampling procedure and data collection<br />

A total of 81 structured questionnaires were administered by<br />

personal interviews with households which owned chickens. These<br />

households were identified using the snowball sampling technique,<br />

where respondents were asked to give referrals to other persons<br />

believed to fit the study requirements. Only those households who<br />

owned chickens and were willing to participate in the research were<br />

considered. Information on village chicken production was gathered<br />

under the following categories: household demography, livestock<br />

inventory, roles of village chickens, chicken nutrition, housing and<br />

health management, and agricultural extension services. Interviews<br />

were conducted with the farmers and key individuals, namely<br />

chairpersons of villages, herbalists and agriculture extension<br />

officers. Farmers’ perceptions of village chicken production<br />

constraints were also gathered.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for<br />

the Social Sciences (SPSS, 2009). Descriptive statistics and cross<br />

tabulations were computed. Chi-square (χ²) for association values<br />

were computed to determine the relationships between the<br />

ownership of village chickens and farmer’s age, and chicken flock<br />

sizes and ownership of larger livestock (cattle).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Household demography<br />

Many household heads (49.4%; n = 40) were over 60<br />

years of age. Most households were female headed<br />

(53.1%; n = 43). Although, the majority of household<br />

heads (85.2%; n = 69) were not employed, they had<br />

attained some form of education-at least up to primary<br />

level (58.0%; n = 47). Household sizes ranged from as<br />

low as 1 to 13, with an average of 7. A majority of the<br />

families (61.7%; n = 50) received some monthly financial<br />

income in the form of old age pension and government<br />

grants. A great portion of village chicken flocks (60.5%; n<br />

= 49) were owned by women, 35.8% (n = 29) were<br />

owned by men, and a few (3.7%; n = 3) were owned by<br />

children. Most village chicken flocks were owned by<br />

persons above 60 years of age (P < 0.05; χ² = 6.7).<br />

Although, ownership translated to chicken management<br />

in terms of decision making, other household members<br />

such as children played a role in looking after the<br />

chickens. Respondents that owned the most cattle also<br />

had large chicken flocks (P < 0.05; χ² = 13.2).<br />

Livestock inventory<br />

Households owned on average of 17 (±2 S.E.M.)<br />

chickens, with a range of 3 to 45. Most farmers (67.9%; n<br />

= 55) also owned cattle, goats, pigs, sheep, and other<br />

poultry, such as geese and ducks, as shown in Table 1.<br />

However, village chickens were ranked as most important<br />

livestock species by most farmers (60.5%; n = 49). On<br />

average each hen laid 11.3 eggs per clutch, with a<br />

hatchability of close to 68.0%. Hatchability levels were<br />

reported to be influenced by the effect of external


parasites (1.2%; n = 1), predation (8.6%; n = 7),<br />

management (32.1%; n = 26) and effects of weather<br />

(27.2%; n = 22). Most farmers actually preferred buying<br />

commercially produced eggs instead of eating those laid<br />

by their own chickens. Dogs were reported to eat some of<br />

the eggs, especially from chickens that incubated eggs<br />

outside in bushes or in the cattle kraals. On the average,<br />

5.2 chicks reached maturity. Most chicks were lost due to<br />

predation and ill-health (24.7%; n = 20 and 33.3%; n =<br />

27, respectively). Chicken production was not considered<br />

an economic venture by most respondents (60.5%; n =<br />

49). Instead they saw it as a means to cater for<br />

household food requirements. Most farmers (91.4%; n =<br />

74) did not introduce new chickens to old flocks, but the<br />

few who did neither inspected, vaccinated nor treated<br />

new chickens for diseases or parasites before introducing<br />

them to the flocks.<br />

Farmers used different criteria when selecting chickens<br />

to be retained for production. The majority considered<br />

size (63.0%; n = 51), others the breed (40.7%; n = 33),<br />

color (16.1%; n = 13) and yet some considered cost<br />

(13.6%; n = 11). Old birds and those with poor productive<br />

performance were consumed as a way of culling the<br />

flocks.<br />

Roles of village chickens<br />

Village chickens were mainly raised for consumption.<br />

Respondents considered village chicken meat a delicacy.<br />

However, there were a few (28.4%; n = 23) farmers who<br />

occasionally sold some of their chickens to neighbours to<br />

get some income. The price for a matured chicken was<br />

R50 (USD7.55) on the average. Most farmers (74.1%; n<br />

= 60) acknowledged that the market for village chickens<br />

was available throughout the year. However, none of the<br />

farmers reported selling chicken eggs but many (43.2%;<br />

n = 35) acknowledged consuming a few and reserving<br />

the rest for incubation. In most cases (64.2%; n = 52)<br />

village chicken eggs were regarded as only important for<br />

incubation purposes as a strategy to increase production.<br />

A few chickens (13.6%; n = 11) were used for gifts and<br />

donations to relatives and friends. Chicken manure was<br />

mostly (62.9%; n = 51) used by respondents to fertilize<br />

their home gardens, where they grew a range of<br />

vegetables. Village chickens were, however, not used in<br />

any rituals or traditional ceremonies.<br />

Nutrition<br />

All chicken flocks scavenged for feed; however, the<br />

majority of households (96.3%; n = 78) provided feed<br />

supplements. In some instances (21.0%; n = 17), specific<br />

feed were prepared for chicks. Supplementary feeds<br />

given to chicks were ground into smaller particles for easy<br />

consumption. Almost all (96.3%; n = 78) respondents<br />

Nyoni and Masika 2649<br />

threw the supplements to the ground for chickens to<br />

peck, while the rest used improvised feeding troughs.<br />

Village chickens were usually given supplementary feed<br />

(74.1%; n = 60) twice a day in the morning and evening,<br />

but in some cases (21.0%; n = 17) were fed just once a<br />

day, in the morning. There was, however, one<br />

respondent who gave supplementary feed three times a<br />

day (morning, noon and evening). The supplementary<br />

feeds were comprised of yellow maize, kitchen wastes,<br />

sunflower cake, grower’s mash for chicks, and/or wheat.<br />

Most farmers (87.7%; n = 71) bought yellow maize to<br />

supplement their chickens. The quantities given as<br />

supplementary feed, however, were based on the<br />

individual farmers’ judgment and varied from household<br />

to household. It ranged from as little as one handful<br />

(approximately, 100 g) of yellow maize grain to about five<br />

handfuls (approximately, 500 g) per day. Furthermore,<br />

most chicken flocks (96.3%; n = 78) were provided with<br />

water. This came from different sources, including wells<br />

(2.5%; n = 2), boreholes (7.4%; n = 6), streams (9.9%; n<br />

= 8), ponds (11.1%; n = 9), and taps (65.4%; n = 53).<br />

Housing<br />

Different forms of housing structures were provided for<br />

the chickens. However, in a few cases chickens roosted<br />

on trees overnight (3.7%; n = 3) and/or in open spaces<br />

(3.7%; n = 3), especially, in the kraals. Chicken houses<br />

were constructed using a wide range of materials. All<br />

structures were roofed with iron sheets. A few structures<br />

(8.6%; n = 7) had solid walls; some had wire mesh<br />

(14.8%; n = 12), whilst most (76.5%; n = 62) had a<br />

combination of iron sheets and wire mesh. Most of the<br />

floors were simply compacted soil (82.7%; n = 67), while<br />

some were either unaltered (11.1%; n = 9) or cemented<br />

(6.2%; n = 5). A few of the farmers provided bedding in<br />

the form of dry grass and/or crop residues (4.9%; n = 4).<br />

Most chicken houses (96.3%; n = 78) were cleaned<br />

approximately once a month on average.<br />

The type of chicken shelters provided by the farmers<br />

depended on availability of resources (75.3%; n = 61)<br />

and were designed is such a way that farmers could<br />

enter without complications (6.2%; n = 5). In some<br />

instances (18.5%; n = 15), however, the shelter provided<br />

was influenced by both availability of resources and<br />

security from theft. A majority of farmers (59.3%; n = 48)<br />

were of the opinion that the chicken house structures<br />

adversely affected the growth and development of their<br />

chicken flocks. However, many did not have the financial<br />

means to make the necessary improvements.<br />

Health management<br />

Most farmers (81.5%; n = 66) acknowledged that health<br />

related problems were a challenge. These ranged from


2650 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

diseases (21.0%; n = 17), parasites (27.2%; n = 22), a<br />

combination of parasites and diseases (49.4%; n = 40), to<br />

wounds (2.5%; n = 2). In this context, disease refers<br />

specifically to a clinically evident condition resulting from<br />

the presence of pathogenic microbial agents, excluding<br />

helminths and ectoparasites. Most of the respondents<br />

(93.8%; n = 76) used alternative remedies, also referred<br />

to as ethno-veterinary medicines (EVM), to control and/or<br />

treat diseases and parasitic infections. The rest either did<br />

not know about the remedies (2.5%; n = 2) or were not<br />

interested in using them (3.7%; n = 3).<br />

Extension services<br />

Government agricultural extension workers have the task<br />

of bringing scientific knowledge to rural farmers. The<br />

object of their task is to improve the efficiency of<br />

agriculture, for instance, in chicken production. Only 6.2%<br />

(n = 5) of the village chicken farmers in the current study<br />

acknowledged having had a chance to access some<br />

advice or information on chicken husbandry from<br />

extension officers. However, the current study revealed<br />

no association between advice or information received by<br />

respondents and village chicken flock sizes (P>0.05; χ² =<br />

5.4). Villagers shared some relevant information with<br />

neighbors, usually when there was a disease outbreak or<br />

when marketing the chickens.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The average number of village chickens owned per<br />

household was consistent with previous studies (Aning,<br />

2006; Muhiye, 2007; Mwale and Masika, 2009). The<br />

small flock sizes may be mainly ascribed to the slow<br />

growth rate and poor egg production of village chickens,<br />

as reported by Phiri et al. (2007). In addition, predation<br />

and ill-health may also be preventing increases in flock<br />

sizes (Mapiye and Sibanda, 2005). Although, some<br />

farmers also owned cattle, goats and sheep, these<br />

livestock were generally relatively low in numbers as<br />

compared to chickens; hence, the latter were regarded as<br />

very important by most farmers.<br />

Ownership of chickens were predominantly by women,<br />

a finding consistent with Halima (2007) and Mwale and<br />

Masika (2009), which could be ascribed to the high<br />

number of female-headed households. However, in the<br />

male-headed households, men were the principal owners<br />

of village chickens, which disagrees with Mwale and<br />

Masika (2009) and Moreki et al. (2010). This deviation<br />

from the previous findings may be due to the fact that<br />

most men in the current study area were not employed<br />

and they did not have other larger livestock to<br />

concentrate on. Thus, to try and fulfil their responsibilities<br />

as principal household providers, men would retain the<br />

ownership of chickens. However, those men who also<br />

had other livestock in relatively large numbers also coowned<br />

village chickens with other household members.<br />

Selection of chickens was based on phenotypic<br />

characteristics similar to findings in earlier studies<br />

(Njenga, 2005; Mogesse, 2007). Farmers valued the size<br />

of the chicken because it was translated to the quantity of<br />

meat per bird, thus, reflecting the main role of these<br />

chickens - consumption. Although, village chickens were<br />

mainly kept for food security, they could be sold in cases<br />

of cash emergencies, a finding also affirmed in previous<br />

studies (Njenga, 2005; Mapiye et al., 2008; Mwale and<br />

Masika, 2009). This could be attributed to the fact that it<br />

is much easier to slaughter a chicken for consumption<br />

than other livestock such as cattle (Mwale and Masika,<br />

2009). In addition, other livestock in the study area were<br />

few in number, hence, the villagers found it imprudent to<br />

slaughter some for consumption. However, a study to<br />

quantify the chicken that farmers consume per annum will<br />

be worth undertaking.<br />

Village chickens were not used in rituals or traditional<br />

ceremonies, in contrast to earlier reports (Mafu and<br />

Masika, 2003; Mack et al., 2005). Respondents, however,<br />

indicated that cattle and goats were the livestock<br />

normally used during cultural ceremonies, a finding<br />

consistent with the reports from the coastal region<br />

(Centane district) of the Eastern Cape (Mwale and<br />

Masika, 2009). However, village chickens were used for<br />

gifts, a finding similar to that of Mwale and Masika (2009)<br />

in Centane. Farmers acknowledged that meat from<br />

village chickens was a delicacy compared to that from<br />

broiler (commercial) chickens. This could explain why<br />

they are used as gifts.<br />

As also reported by Mapiye et al. (2008), productivity in<br />

terms of number of eggs laid per clutch, chicks hatched<br />

per clutch and chick survival to maturity were very low.<br />

The reported low hatchability could have resulted from<br />

the effect of external parasites which tended to bite and<br />

irritate chickens during incubation. When chickens are<br />

affected by external parasites they tend to leave their<br />

eggs often, and may abandon them completely in some<br />

cases (Banjo et al., 2009). Low hatchability may have<br />

also resulted from production of infertile eggs, poor egg<br />

handling and both incorrect storage and improper<br />

incubation environment, as supported by Cooper (2001).<br />

Furthermore, microbial infection of chicken eggs caused<br />

by contaminated nests and poor sanitation, results in low<br />

hatchability (Cooper, 2001). Chicken eggs in the current<br />

study were regarded as important only for incubation<br />

purposes and not for consumption, which may have been<br />

a strategy to counter the low hatchability so as to grow<br />

their flocks.<br />

Although, supplementary feed was provided, village<br />

chickens depended mainly on scavenging for their<br />

nutritional needs, a finding consistent with Njenga (2005),<br />

Muchadeyi et al. (2007) and Mwale and Masika (2009).<br />

Feed supplementation was mainly maize grain, as<br />

observed in similar studies in Zimbabwe (Muchadeyi


et al., 2004), Ethiopia (Halima, 2007) and South Africa<br />

(Mwale and Masika, 2009). Not only did scavenging<br />

affect nutrition, it also exposed the chickens to predation,<br />

diseases and parasites, as also found by Acamovic et al.<br />

(2005). In addition, chickens at different stages of growth<br />

were left to compete for the same feed, a finding<br />

consistent with Muchadeyi et al. (2004) who reported that<br />

the provision of supplementary feed was indiscriminate<br />

and all age groups typically competed for the<br />

supplement. This non-preferential feeding might result in<br />

weaker groups, such as chicks, getting sub-optimal<br />

nutrition (Tadelle and Ogle, 2001). Moreover, since the<br />

supplements were thrown to the ground, feed losses<br />

(especially, of small grains) were inevitable and the<br />

chances of chicken exposure to internal parasites were<br />

increased.<br />

The finding in the current study that the quantities given<br />

as supplementary feeds were based on the individual<br />

farmers’ judgment and varied from household to<br />

household as was also observed by Mapiye et al. (2008).<br />

Chickens are known to require different amount of<br />

nutrients depending on the production stage (Tadelle and<br />

Ogle, 2001; Ogle et al., 2004). It is not clear, however,<br />

whether the chickens got enough nutrients through<br />

scavenging and supplementary feeding. Adequate hen<br />

nutrition is vital for ensuring fertility, increasing the<br />

number of eggs laid, and ensuring good survival rates of<br />

hatched chicks (Cooper, 2001). The fluctuations in the<br />

supply of feed resources require appropriate strategic<br />

supplementation programmes (Muchadeyi et al., 2005).<br />

Frequency of feeding in terms of when, what, and how to<br />

feed and the quantity to feed are important aspects to<br />

consider in developing strategies to improve the nutrition<br />

of village chickens (Mapiye and Sibanda, 2005; Mapiye et<br />

al., 2008). Most farmers in the current study provided<br />

clean water for their chickens, a finding in agreement with<br />

Mwale and Masika (2009). This could be due to the<br />

proximity and availability of clean water in the area of<br />

study.<br />

Village chickens are vulnerable to theft and easily<br />

predated upon when not sheltered. The finding of this<br />

study that most chicken flocks were provided with<br />

housing is consistent with some recent studies<br />

(Muchadeyi et al., 2007; Mwale and Masika, 2009).<br />

Provision of shelter for chickens mainly during the night<br />

was in agreement with previous reports (Muchadeyi et<br />

al., 2004; Mwale and Masika, 2009). Most chicken<br />

keepers resorted to cheap and locally available materials<br />

such as mud, wooden poles, and corrugated sheets, as<br />

also reported by Mapiye et al. (2008).<br />

Although, these village chickens contributed<br />

significantly towards the livelihoods of rural people in the<br />

study area in terms of food security, they were highly<br />

susceptible not only to parasite infestation, as Mwale and<br />

Masika (2009) reported, but also diseases. The disease<br />

challenge has previously been attributed to different ages<br />

in a flock, possible transfer from wild birds, and constant<br />

Nyoni and Masika 2651<br />

use of the land by poultry thereby, facilitating the<br />

numbers of parasites build up (Acamovic et al., 2005).<br />

Various conventional drugs for controlling parasites and<br />

treating diseases of chickens have been effectively<br />

developed globally (Maphosa et al., 2004), however,<br />

most respondents were resource-limited and could not<br />

afford to purchase these drugs, a finding which is also<br />

supported by Mwale et al. (2005). Thus, most of them<br />

resorted to the use of alternative remedies when a<br />

disease or parasitic infection presented itself as a<br />

measure of control or treatment, respectively (Mathius-<br />

Mundy and McCorkle 1989; Mwale et al., 2005).<br />

However, information in the Eastern Cape Province of<br />

South Africa on the use of Ethno-Veterinary Medicine<br />

(EVM) in village chickens are very limited (Mwale and<br />

Masika, 2009). EVM can play a significant role in<br />

grassroots development, which seeks to empower people<br />

by enhancing the use of their own knowledge and<br />

resources (Mwale and Masika, 2009). It will be therefore,<br />

imperative for researchers to validate these EVM to<br />

ascertain their efficacy and document the findings for<br />

current and future use.<br />

Village chicken production was carried out with no<br />

extension support, a finding consistent with a study<br />

conducted in Limpopo Province (Swatson et al., 2002).<br />

Farmers in the current study made use of their<br />

indigenous poultry rearing knowledge acquired over a<br />

long period of time, which is consistent with the findings<br />

of Swatson et al. (2002). Although, farmers shared some<br />

information on chicken production, there were no farmer<br />

organizations from which households could obtain<br />

chicken village chicken husbandry information or<br />

education. Village chicken production has not been<br />

accorded the recognition it requires in terms of<br />

development and policy support by governmental<br />

institutions and non-governmental organizations, yet, it<br />

contributes significantly to the livelihoods of rural people.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The current study revealed that village chickens play a<br />

very important role in the livelihoods of rural farmers by<br />

meeting their family food needs.<br />

Chicken flocks were provided with supplementary<br />

feeds, clean water and some form of shelter. Predation<br />

and health related problems were the main causes for<br />

chicken losses.<br />

Farmers used alternative remedies to control parasitic<br />

infestations and treat diseases but they did not have any<br />

chicken husbandry education which may have led to<br />

mismanagement of flocks. Since this study is limited to<br />

the documentation of village chicken production in<br />

Amatola basin, there is the need for a further research to<br />

ascertain the extent to which chicken management<br />

practices and environmental variables affect village<br />

chicken productivity in the area of study.


2652 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The financial assistance from the National Research<br />

Foundation of South Africa (Project number UID 62298)<br />

is acknowledged with gratitude. Authors, also thankfully<br />

acknowledged the support from the Agricultural and Rural<br />

Development Research Institute (ARDRI), the<br />

Department of Livestock and Pasture Science and the<br />

farmers in the Amatola Basin, Eastern Cape Province.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Acamovic T, Sinurat A, Natarajan A, Anitha K, Chandrasekaran D,<br />

Shindey D, Sparks N, Oduguwa O, Mupeta B, Kitalyi A (2005).<br />

Poultry. In: Owen et al. (eds), Livestock and Wealth Creation:<br />

Improving the husbandry of animals kept by resource-poor people in<br />

developing countries. Editors. Nottingham University Press,<br />

Nottingham, pp. 301-322.<br />

Alders R and Spradbrow P (2001). Controlling Newcastle disease in<br />

Village chickens ACIAR Monograph, 82: 112.<br />

Alders R, Bagnol B, Harun M, Young M (2007). Village poultry, food<br />

security and HIV/AIDS mitigation. LEISA Magazine, 3 September<br />

2007, 23, 20-21.<br />

http://www.leisa.info/index.php?url=getblob.php&o_id=191135&a_id=<br />

211&a_seq=0<br />

Aning KG (2006). The structure and importance of the commercial and<br />

village based poultry in Ghana. Poultry review-Ghana. Accra, FAO,<br />

United Nations, p. 23.<br />

Banjo AD, Otufale GA, Awobajo OK (2009). Indigenous Control of Mite<br />

in Poultry Farming in Ogun State Nigeria. J. Appli. Sci. Res., 5(10):<br />

1767-1771.<br />

Cooper RG (2001). Handling, incubation, and hatchability of ostrich<br />

(struthio camelus var. domesticus) eggs: a review. Department of<br />

Physiology, University of Zimbabwe. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 10: 262–<br />

273.<br />

Gillespie JR, Flanders FB (2009). Modern Livestock and Poultry<br />

Production Texas Science Series, illustrated. Cengage Learning, pp.<br />

8: 696.<br />

Gondwe TN, Wolly CBA (2007). Local chicken production system in<br />

Malawi: Household flock structure, dynamics, management and<br />

health. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 103-113.<br />

Halima HM (2007). Phenotypic and genetic characterization of<br />

indigenous chicken populations in North-West Ethiopia. PhD Thesis.<br />

Submitted to the faculty of natural and agricultural sciences<br />

department of animal, wildlife and grassland Sciences. University of<br />

the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.<br />

ISCW (2008). Institute for Soil Climate and Water: Agromet Section<br />

079/221 L.A., Climate Annual and Monthly Totals and Averages,<br />

Pretoria.<br />

Kalita N, Saikia P, Baruah N, Talukdar JK (2004). Department of Poultry<br />

Science, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural<br />

University, Khanapara, Guwahati–781022, India.<br />

Mack S, Hoffman D, Otte J (2005). The contribution of poultry to rural<br />

development. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 61: 7-14.<br />

Mafu JV, Masika PJ (2003). Smallscale broiler production by rural<br />

farmers in the central Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Fort<br />

Hare Papers, 12(1): 25-34.<br />

Maphosa T, Kusina JF, Kusina NT, Makuza S, Sibanda S (2004). A<br />

monitoring study comparing production of village chickens between<br />

communal and small-scale commercial farming areas in Zimbabwe.<br />

Livestock Research for Rural Development, pp. 16.<br />

Mapiye C, Sibanda S (2005). Constraints and opportunities of village<br />

chicken production system in the smallholder sector of Rushinga<br />

district of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 17<br />

(10), http://www.cipav.org.co/Irrd/Irrd17/10/mapi17115.htm<br />

(Accessed: 5 May 2010).<br />

Mapiye C, Mwale M, Mupangwa JF, Chimonyo M, Foti R, Mutenje MJ<br />

(2008). A research Review of Village Chicken production constraints<br />

and opportuinities in Zimbabwe. The Asian-Australasian Association<br />

of Animal Production Sciences, 21(11): 1680-1688.<br />

Mathius-Mundy E, McCorkle CM (1989). Ethnoverterinary medicine: an<br />

annotated bibliography. Bibliographies in Technology and Social<br />

Change, 6: 199.<br />

McAinsh CV, Kusina J, Madsen J, Nyoni O (2004). Traditional chicken<br />

production in Zimbabwe. World’s Poult. Sci, J., 60: 233–246.<br />

Mogesse HH (2007). Phenotypic and genetic characterization of<br />

indigenous chicken populations in Northwest Ethiopia. PhD Thesis,<br />

University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.<br />

Moreki JC (2010). Village poultry production in Serowe-Palapye subdistrict<br />

of Botswana. Livestock Research for Rural Development,<br />

22(5), http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/3/more22055.htm, (Accesssed, 3<br />

August 2010).<br />

Muchadeyi FC, Sibanda S, Kusina NT, Kusina J, Makuza S (2004). The<br />

village chicken production system in Rushinga District in Zimbabwe.<br />

Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16.<br />

Muchadeyi FC, Wollny CBA, Eding H, Weigend S, Makuza SM,<br />

Simianer H (2007). Variation in village production systems among<br />

agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe. Institute of Animal Breeding<br />

Mariensee. Federal Research center. Germany. Trop. Anim. Health<br />

Prod., 39: 453-461.<br />

Muchadeyi FC, Sibanda S, Kusina NT, Kusina J, Makuza SM (2005).<br />

Village chicken flock dynamics and the contribution of chickens to<br />

household livelihoods in a smallholder farming area in Zimbabwe.<br />

Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 37: 333–344.<br />

Muhiye MG (2007). Characterization of smallholder poultry production<br />

and marketing system of Dale, Wonsho and Loka Abaya Weredas of<br />

Southern Ethiopia. MSc. (Animal Sciences) Thesis. Hawassa<br />

University, Awassa, Ethiopia. http://www.ipmsethiopia.org/content/files/Documents/publications/MscTheses/FinalTh<br />

esis_MekonnenGebreEgziabher.pdf. (Accessed, 17 July 2010).<br />

Mwale M, Masika PJ (2009). Ethno-veterinary control of parasites,<br />

management and role of village chickens in rural households of<br />

Centane district in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Trop. Anim.<br />

Health Prod., 41: 1685-1693.<br />

Mwale M, Bhebhe E, Chimonyo M, Halimani TE (2005). Use of herbal<br />

plants in poultry health management in the Mushagashe Small Scale<br />

Commercial Farming Area in Zimbabwe. Inter, J, Appl. Veterin.<br />

Med., 3(2): 163-170.<br />

Njenga SK (2005). Productivity and socio-cultural aspects of local<br />

poultry phenotypes in coastal Kenya. (Unpublished MSc. Thesis. The<br />

Royal and Agricultural University (KVL), Denmark).<br />

Ogle B, Minh DV, Lindberg JE (2004). Effects of scavenging and protein<br />

supplementation on the feed intake and performance of improved<br />

pullets and laying hens in Northen Veitnam. Asian-Austral. J. Anim.<br />

Sci., 17(11): 1553-1561.<br />

Phiri IK, Phiri AM, Ziela M, Chota A, Masuku M, Monrad J (2007).<br />

Prevalence and distribution of gastrointestinal helminths and their<br />

effects on weight gain in free-range chickens in Central Zambia.<br />

Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 309–315.<br />

Sonaiya EB (2000). Backyard Poultry Production for Socio-economic<br />

Advancement of the Nigeria Family: Requirement for Research and<br />

Development in Nigeria. Poult. Sci. J., 1: 88-107.<br />

Sonaiya EB (2007). Review article: Family poultry, food security and the<br />

impact of HPAI. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 63: 132-138.<br />

SPSS (2009). The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).<br />

2010. Base 18.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago IL.<br />

Swatson HK, Tshovhote J, Nesamvumi E, Ranwedzi NE, Fourie C<br />

(2002). Characterization of indigenous free ranging poultry production<br />

systems under traditional management conditions in Vhembe district<br />

of the Limpopo Province, South<br />

Africa(http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/infpd/documents/pap<br />

ers/2004/5vhembe1109.pdf) (Accessed: 7 June, 2010).<br />

Tadelle D, Ogle B (2001). Village poultry production systems in the<br />

central highlands of Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 33(6): 521-<br />

537.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2653-2663, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.385<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

The relationship between agricultural intensification<br />

and sustainability in China<br />

Hong-Wei Chen 1,2 and Da-Fu Wu 2,3 *<br />

1 College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.<br />

2 Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, China.<br />

3 Institute of Soil Science, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 21008, China.<br />

Accepted 12 March, 2012<br />

According to the principles of agricultural sustainability, combining with utilizing the methods of<br />

principal components analysis, we made full use of statistical data from 1949 to 1998, Yujiang County,<br />

Jiangxi province. At the same time, the assessing system included 28 formed. The results showed that<br />

agricultural sustainability rose increasingly with agricultural intensification growth. However, both of<br />

them kept the same pace. The production sustainability index has been increased from 0.0808 in 1949<br />

to 0.1496 in 1998. The annual raising rate has reached 1.265% during 50 years in Yujiang County; the<br />

economic sustainability index leaped from 0.0166 in 1949 to 0.4093 in 1998. It is enlarged 24.65 times<br />

compared with that of 1949. The ecological sustainability index has augmented 0.125% yearly since<br />

1949. In general, the sustainability index reached 0.7533 in 1998. When the agricultural intensification is<br />

raised 1 unit, the sustainability would be enhanced by rate of 0.0001.<br />

Key words: Yujiang County, sustainability, agriculture, intensification.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Many definitions about sustainable agriculture and<br />

sustainability have been put forward since 1987. A widely<br />

accepted definition for sustainable agriculture was the<br />

one adopted in 1988 by The American Society of<br />

Agronomy (1988), namely, the sustainable agriculture<br />

enhances environmental quality and the resource on<br />

which the development of agriculture depends, and<br />

provides for basic human food and fiber needs, and is<br />

economically viable, and enhances the quality of life for<br />

farmers and society as a whole. The term sustainability<br />

was first advanced in 1980 by the International Union for<br />

the Conservation of Nature and National Resources<br />

(Lele, 1991). While sustainability is a complex and wideranging<br />

concept and sustainability properties dimensions<br />

vary widely (Filson, 2004). Agricultural intensification can<br />

be technically defined as an increase in agricultural<br />

production per unit of inputs (which may be labour, land,<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: bshxld@gmail.com. Tel:<br />

+86 373 3693629.<br />

time, fertilizer, seed, feed or cash). For practical<br />

purposes, intensification occurs when there is an<br />

increase in the total volume of agricultural production that<br />

results from a higher productivity of inputs, or agricultural<br />

production is maintained while certain inputs are<br />

decreased (FAO, 2004). They therefore employ relatively<br />

larger investments in land, labor, and capital than was<br />

traditionally the case when smaller, more mixed farming<br />

operations predominated (Filson, 2004).<br />

Nearly 100% of farmers in China use improved<br />

varieties of rice, wheat and maize (Huang et al., 1999),<br />

together with subsequent investments in water<br />

controlling, intensification of chemical input use.<br />

According to the state statistical data, the fertilizer<br />

application reached 298 kg·hm -2 in 2004. Officially, the<br />

percentage of irrigated arable land has risen from 16% in<br />

1950 to nearly 50% in 1990’s (Conway, 1997). Since<br />

1990s, it has been paid high attention to the sustainable<br />

development of intensive Chinese agriculture which<br />

follows the same definition of FAO, Earth Summit<br />

document. During the same period, some scientists have<br />

voiced concerns that the intensification of farming


2654 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

systems may not be sustainable because of systematic<br />

degradation of the resource base and environment<br />

(Pingal et al., 1994). Brown (Brown, 1995; Brown and<br />

Halweil, 1998) addressed “who will feed China?” and<br />

“China’s water shortage could shake world food security”.<br />

China is not only the world’s most populous country, but<br />

also its economy grows fast. China is faced with an<br />

extraordinary challenge (Brown, 2005). Could not the<br />

intensive China’s agriculture develop sustainably?<br />

Concerning reports have not been found, so the author<br />

according the principles of agricultural sustainability<br />

collected the data of Yujiang county, Jiangxi province,<br />

adopted the SPSS method to get the weight of index,<br />

obtained the value of agricultural sustainability since 1949<br />

by comparing the sustainability every year.<br />

At last it revealed the relationship between the<br />

intensification and sustainability of agriculture in china.<br />

RESEARCH METHODS<br />

General condition of research region<br />

The researched area was Yujiang County, Jixiang province. Its sites<br />

are 116° 41' ~ 117° 09' E, 28° 04' ~ 28° 37' N. In 2008, the<br />

population was 335500, and the total area of arable land was 20400<br />

ha. The total land area is 927 km 2 , 78.2% of which is covered with<br />

the mountain area and only 21.8% of which is the plain. The<br />

average of sunshine duration is 1809 h per year. The mean annual<br />

temperature is 17.6°C. The number of frost-free season is 262<br />

days. The average annual precipitation could reach 1700 mm.<br />

Moreover, the level of agricultural intensification was high, for<br />

instance, total machine power reached 2.94 kW/ha, and the rate of<br />

fertilizer application was 675.8 kg/ha. Therefore, these conditions<br />

would play a key role in intensive agricultural development.<br />

The standardization of original data<br />

There were diversities of dimensions and quantitative levels in the<br />

original data. For the sake of analysis, it was essential to standard<br />

original data. Therefore, both of the dimensions would be unified<br />

and the gap of quantitative levels of indexes could be eliminated.<br />

The formula of standardization for original data was as follows:<br />

x<br />

x<br />

i<br />

man<br />

� x<br />

� x<br />

min<br />

min<br />

Where: Xi = original data on every index, Xmin = the minimum datum<br />

of original data, Xmax = the maximum datum of original data.<br />

After the standardization of original data, the value of data would<br />

be between 0 and 1.<br />

Selecting the method to confirm the evaluation indexes weight<br />

The weight vectors were confirmed by the method of principal<br />

components analysis. The standardization data should be used and<br />

analysed with method of principal components analysis, the<br />

contribute rate (CR) and factor loading matrix (FLM) would be<br />

calculated. The accumulation of CR multiplying by FLM of main<br />

components could express the effects on total information by each<br />

index. This method was proposed by Wu and Chen (1996a). The<br />

formula was as:<br />

WKi =<br />

n<br />

�<br />

j�1<br />

n n<br />

��<br />

i�1<br />

j�1<br />

CR(<br />

j)<br />

* FLM(<br />

ji)<br />

CR(<br />

j)<br />

* FLM(<br />

ji)<br />

Where: Wk = index weight; i = the serial number of index; j = main<br />

component; n = the number of index; CR = the contribute rate of<br />

main component; FLM = factor loading matrix.<br />

According to the afore-mentioned formula, the weight per index<br />

would be easily confirmed.<br />

Weight of evaluation indexes confirming<br />

According to the aforementioned method, the weight of index would<br />

be decided, the results was showed in Table 2.<br />

EVALUATION SYSTEMS<br />

The data collection<br />

The statistics data were furnished by statistics office of Yujiang<br />

county, Jiangxi province. A few data were gotten by forum with<br />

some offices of agriculture office, Forestry Office of Yujiang County.<br />

Production sustainability<br />

The production sustainability is that the produce could meet the<br />

need of economic growth and increasingly improve the living<br />

standard. It is affected by many factors such as industrial input<br />

including inorganic fertilizers, pesticides and mechanization of<br />

agriculture (Chi, 1990; Shen, 1996; Niu, 1997; Luo, 2001; Chen,<br />

2003).<br />

Economic sustainability<br />

The economic sustainability involves both economic beneficial and<br />

efficiency aspects. The economic benefits are the primary content<br />

of agricultural production; they are the core of agricultural<br />

sustainability. The economic sustainability focuses on the aspects of<br />

increasing growth of economic benefits and efficiency (Niu, 1997;<br />

Luo, 2001; Chen, 2003; Ren, 1995).<br />

Ecological sustainability<br />

The ecological sustainability is defined as making full use of<br />

resources, protecting natural environment and improving the<br />

environmental quality. However, better environment is the crucial<br />

basis of production and economic sustainability. So the ecological<br />

sustainability means a responsibility for the environment - a<br />

stewardship of our natural resources (Luo, 2001; Wu and Chen,<br />

1996b; Niu, 1997; Chen et al., 1993). Amongst production,<br />

economic, and ecological sustainability, they are integration, and<br />

they promote the intensive agriculture sustainable development.<br />

Therefore, production, economic and ecological sustainability play<br />

the same role of the development of intensive agriculture.


Table 1. The evaluation system of intensive agriculture in Yujiang County.<br />

The first level of indexes The second level of indexes The third level of indexes<br />

Production sustainability (PS)<br />

Economic sustainability (ES1)<br />

Ecological sustainability (ES2)<br />

The evaluation index and systems<br />

Natural resources index (NRI)<br />

Agricultural intensification index (AII)<br />

Production index (PI)<br />

Production efficiency index (PEI)<br />

Production benefit index (PBI)<br />

Economic efficiency of production index (EEPI)<br />

Resources utilization index (RUI)<br />

Agricultural calamity- resistance index (ACRI)<br />

The evaluation system was established (Table 1). It is consistent<br />

with afore-mentioned principle of sustainability. The evaluation<br />

system would be divided into three levels (He and Bi, 1986; Hou,<br />

1999). The first level included production, economic and ecological<br />

sustainability indexes. The second one was composed of different<br />

index groups that indicated three sustainabilities, namely, the<br />

production sustainability indexes were formed by natural resources<br />

index, agricultural intensification index, production index; economic<br />

sustainability indexes were formed by production efficiency index,<br />

production benefit index, and economic efficiency of production; the<br />

ecological sustainability indexes were constructed by index of<br />

resources utilization and agricultural calamity-resistance index. The<br />

third one included 28 index. The detail contents were showed in<br />

Table 1.<br />

Chen and Wu 2655<br />

Area of arable land per capita (AALPC)<br />

Area of paddy rice per capita (APRPC)<br />

Amount of fertilizer application per area (AFAPA)<br />

Agricultural intensification (AI)<br />

Commercial ratio of agricultural production (CRAP)<br />

Amount of grain per capita (AGPC)<br />

Amount of meat per capita (AMPC)<br />

Yield of rice per area (YRPA)<br />

Yield of grain per area (YGPA)<br />

Commercial ratio of pig (CRP)<br />

Total value of agricultural (TVA)<br />

Value of plantation (VP)<br />

Value of livestock (VL)<br />

Value of forestry (VF)<br />

Value of aquaculture (VA)<br />

Net Income per capita (NIPC)<br />

Output value per labor (OVPL)<br />

Output value per capita (OVPC)<br />

Productivity (P)<br />

Nitrogen balance index (NBI)<br />

Phosphorus balance index (PBIp)<br />

Potassium balance index (PBIk)<br />

Planting index (PI)<br />

Ratio of energy output to input (REOI)<br />

Rate of light utilization of grain (RLUG)<br />

Rate of light utilization of rice (RLUR)<br />

Irrigation rate of arable land (IRAL)<br />

Rate of calamity- resistance (RCR)<br />

RESULTS AND ANALYSIS<br />

The relationship between intensification and the<br />

production sustainability<br />

Among the components of production sustainability index,<br />

the natural resources index has been heavily cut down<br />

with the population size increasingly growth. On the<br />

contrary, the agricultural intensification index has been<br />

zoomed with the rate of machine, electronic power,<br />

artificial fertilizer application per area of arable field<br />

growing; the agricultural production index has been<br />

enlarged with the crop yields rising (Figure 1). From 1949


2656 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

value of NRI/AII/API/PS<br />

Table 2. The weight of evaluation index of intensive agriculture in Yujiang County.<br />

Index Weight Index weight Index weight Index weight<br />

AALPC 0.0386 YRPA 0.0361 VA 0.0400 PBIk 0.0340<br />

APRPC 0.0367 YGPA 0.0368 NIPC 0.0403 PI 0.0315<br />

AFAPA 0.0398 CRP 0.0393 OVPL 0.0404 REOI 0.0382<br />

AI 0.0399 TVA 0.0395 OVPC 0.0242 RLUG 0.0288<br />

CRAP 0.0388 VP 0.0371 P 0.0363 RLUR 0.0216<br />

AGPC 0.0168 VL 0.0386 NBI 0.0361 IRAL 0.0395<br />

AMPC 0.0350 VF 0.0396 PBIp 0.0368 RCR 0.0397<br />

Value of NRI/AII/API/PS<br />

0.18<br />

0.16<br />

0.14<br />

0.12<br />

0.10<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

NRI<br />

AII<br />

API<br />

PS<br />

0.00<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 1. The relationship between PS and NRI, AII and PI in Yujiang County for 50 years.<br />

to 1998, the NRI was gradually cut down by population<br />

size augment. The AALPC and APRPC reached the<br />

minimum in 1998. The natural resources index had been<br />

reduced at the rate of 0.1506% during 50 years in Yujiang<br />

County. The corresponding period, the AALPC and<br />

APRPC had been decreased by 67.53 and 68%,<br />

respectively. The former decreasing annual rate was<br />

0.2592% and the latter was cut down by the rate of<br />

0.2316% annually (Figure 2). In the same period, AII has<br />

been continuously grown; the annual increasing rate<br />

reached 0.1594% (Figure 2). AFAPA had outgrown from<br />

1.3 kg·ha -1 in 1949 to 786.44 kg·ha -1 in 1998. As for the<br />

AI, it climbed about 38 times from 140.38 CNY in 1949 to<br />

5327.03 in 1998 (Figure 3). Moreover, PI has been<br />

aggrandized, the rate of agricultural production index<br />

arrived at 0.1286% per year (Figure 1). Since CRAP was<br />

raised from 18.83% in 1949 to 42.30% in 1998; the<br />

AGPC reached 431 kg and AMPC was 81.8 kg in 1998,<br />

but the AGPC was only 238.7 kg in 1949, the AMPC was<br />

15.23 kg in 1978 (Figure 4).<br />

In general, the PS index has been increased as<br />

85.15% from 0.0808 in 1949 to 0.1496 in 1998. The<br />

annual raising rate reached 1.265% for 50 years in<br />

Yujiang County.<br />

The relationship between economic sustainability<br />

index and production efficiency, production benefit<br />

and economic efficiency of production index<br />

The economic sustainability index was affected by<br />

production efficiency, production benefit and economic<br />

efficiency of production index. However, the production<br />

efficiency was affected by YRPA, YGPA and CRP. Both<br />

YRPA and YGPA increasingly grow with AI. In comparison<br />

with production efficiency of 1949, it enhanced almost 2<br />

times and reached 0.1105 (Figure 5). Figure 5 indicated<br />

that the economic sustainability soared from 0.0166 in<br />

1949 to 0.4093 in 1998. It enlarged 24.65 times<br />

comparing with that of 1949. The annually leaping rate


AI(CNY)<br />

AI (CNY)<br />

area (ha)<br />

Area (ha)<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

AALPC<br />

APRPC<br />

0.00<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 2. The variation of AALPC and APRPC during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

AI<br />

AFAPA<br />

0<br />

1949 1969 1989<br />

year<br />

Figure 3. The variation of AI and AFAPA during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

was 6.7596% as a result of net income increase. YRPA<br />

and YGPA increasingly rose. The former enlarged from<br />

1275 kg·ha -1 in 1949 to 8048 kg·ha -1 in 1998; the latter<br />

leap more than 7 times (from 990 to 7667 kg·ha -1 ). The<br />

commercial rate of pig rose from 74.26% in 1949 to<br />

145.29% in 1998. It has been benefited from “Green<br />

Revolution”. Thereby production efficiency index<br />

increasingly rose at the annual rate of 0.188% (Figure 6).<br />

Chen and Wu 2657<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

During the same term, the production benefit index<br />

enhanced in 1784 times. The increasing rate reached<br />

16.51% annually. The TVA, VP, VL, VF, and VA outgrow<br />

were 52.38, 25.16, 75.97, 327.25 and 208.2 times for 50<br />

years, respectively (Figure 7).<br />

As to the economic efficiency of production index, it<br />

reached 0.1204 in 1998. The NIPC, OVPL, OVPC, and P<br />

raised to 2082, 5217.16 and 1986.81 CNY, and 1133 kg<br />

0<br />

AFAPA (kgha -1 )<br />

AFAPA(kgha -1 )


2658 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

AFGPC/AMPC(kg)<br />

AFGPC/AMPC (kg)<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

AGPC<br />

AMPC<br />

CRAP<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 4. The variation of AGPC, AMPC and CRAP during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

value of PEI/PBI/EEPI/ES1<br />

Value of PEI/PBI/EEPI/ES1<br />

0.45<br />

0.40<br />

0.35<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

PEI<br />

PBI<br />

EEPI<br />

ES1<br />

0.00<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 5. The variation of ES1, PEI, PBI and EEPI during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

in 1998, respectively; compared with that of 1949, they<br />

raised about 56.3, 22.1, 17.7 and 1.5 times, respectively<br />

(Figure 8).<br />

The relationship between ecological sustainability<br />

index and resources utilization and agricultural<br />

calamity- resistance index<br />

The ecological sustainability index was affected by<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

resources utilization and agricultural calamity- resistance<br />

index. The resources utilization index was determined by<br />

NBI, PBIP, PBIK, PI, REOI, LURFG and LURR. The NBI,<br />

PBIP, PBIK were defined that input of N and/or P and/or<br />

K to output of N and/or P and/or K in agriculture systems.<br />

But the calamity- resistance index rested with the IRAI<br />

and RCR. Therefore, the ecological sustainability index<br />

augmented 0.125% yearly since 1949 (from 0.1319 in<br />

1949 to 0.1944 in 1998) (Figure 9). From 1949 to 1998,<br />

the resources utilization index increased from 0.0932 to<br />

5<br />

CRAP(%)<br />

CRAP (%)


YRPA/YFGPA(kg/hm 2 )<br />

YRPA/YFGPA (kg/hm 2 )<br />

YRPA/YFGPA (kg/hm2)<br />

YRPA/FGPA (kg/hm2 )<br />

9000<br />

8000<br />

7000<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

YGPA<br />

YRPA<br />

CRP<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

年份 Years<br />

Year<br />

Figure 6. The variation of YRPA, YGPA and CRP during 50 years.<br />

TVA/VP/VL/VA (10kCNY)<br />

TVA/VP/VL/VA (10kCNY)<br />

70000<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

TVA<br />

VP<br />

VL<br />

VA<br />

VF<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 7. The variation of TVA, VP, VL, VF and VA during 50 years.<br />

0.1217. The nitrogen nutrition turned from the state of<br />

shortage into the state of surplus with the chemical<br />

fertilizer application. The nitrogen balance was 1.16 in<br />

1949 and 0.47 in 1998. However, as for the phosphorous<br />

balance and potassium balance, the conditions were on<br />

the contrary. The phosphorus was still plenitude; the<br />

phosphorous balance was 0.23 in 1949 and 0.15 in 1998.<br />

The potassium nutrition still changed from grievous<br />

shortage to slight surplus. It was shown by that potassium<br />

balance (3.35 in 1949 and 0.90 in 1998). The REOI still<br />

Chen and Wu 2659<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

VF(10kCNY)<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

slightly decreased from 3.42 in 1949 to 2.89 in 1998<br />

(Figure 10). As to the RLUG, RLUR rose from 0.0778 and<br />

0.1003% in 1949 to 0.6029 and 0.6328% in 1998. The<br />

planting index enhanced 120.3 from 154.8% in 1949 to<br />

275.1% in 1998 (Figure 11).<br />

On the other hand, with the rate of arable land<br />

increasing (from 4.91% in 1949 to 92.13% in 1998), and<br />

rate of calamity-resistance decreasing (from 90.53% in<br />

1949 to 81.91% in 1998), the calamity- resistance index<br />

grow to 0.034 (from 0.0387 in 1949 to 0.0727 in 1998)<br />

VF (10kCNY)<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

CRP(%)<br />

CRP (%)


2660 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

value of RUI/ACRI/ES2<br />

(CNY)<br />

Value of RUI/ACRI/ES2<br />

(CNY)<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

P<br />

OVPC<br />

OVPL<br />

NIPC<br />

0<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 8. The variation of P (kg), OVPC, OVPL and NIPC (CNY) during 50 years.<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

RUI<br />

ACRI<br />

ES2<br />

0.00<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 9. The variation of ES2, RUI and ACRI during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

(Figure 12). Figure 12 showed that the RCR was the<br />

lowest during 1960 to 1980s. We thought that the<br />

population rapidly increased and needed much more<br />

lands to convert into farmlands; the agricultural<br />

intensification level was low, the agricultural machines<br />

were poor, thereby the agricultural production was<br />

threatened by drought and flood disasters, also the<br />

application of pesticide was little, the pest or disease<br />

might decrease the yield, even get nothing.<br />

The variation of sustainability since 1949 in Yujiang<br />

County<br />

Since 1949, the sustainability has been increasingly<br />

grown in Yujiang County. The sustainability was merely


NBI/PBIK/REOI<br />

NBI/PBIK/REOI<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 10. The variation of NBI, PBIP, PBIK and REOI during 50 years.<br />

PI(%)<br />

PI (%)<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

PI<br />

RLUG<br />

RLUR<br />

0<br />

1949 1969 1989<br />

year<br />

NBI<br />

PBIK<br />

REOI<br />

PBIP<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

Figure 11. The variation of PI, RLUG and RLUR (%) during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

0.2294 in 1949, but it was 0.7533 in 1998. It climbed 3.28<br />

times (Figure 13).<br />

The relationship between sustainability and<br />

agricultural intensification in Yujiang County<br />

In order to study the relationship between sustainability<br />

RLUR/RLUFG(%)<br />

RLUR/RLUFG (%)<br />

Chen and Wu 2661<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

and agricultural intensification in Yujiang County, the<br />

formula of sustainability (y) and agricultural intensification<br />

(x) was established:<br />

y = 0.0001x + 0.2184, R 2 = 0.9268, r = 0.9627**, r0.01 =<br />

0.328, r0.05 = 0.235<br />

According to the formula, it is obviously found that the<br />

PBIP<br />

PBIP


2662 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

sustainability<br />

Sustainability<br />

IRAL/RCR(%)<br />

IRAL/RCR (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

IRAL<br />

RCR<br />

0<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 12. The variation of IRAL (%) and RCR (%) during 50 years in Yujiang County.<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999<br />

year<br />

Figure 13. The variation of sustainability since 1949 in Yujiang County.<br />

sustainability increased with agricultural intensification<br />

rising. Because they have linear relationship, and<br />

agricultural intensification raised 1 unit, the sustainability<br />

would be enhanced to 0.0001.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Agricultural sustainability has become an increasingly<br />

important issue in the latter half of the 20th Century, and<br />

in particular how this can be matched with intensification<br />

(Morse et al., 2002). Today, concerns about sustainability<br />

centre on the need to develop agricultural technologies<br />

and practices that do not have adverse effects on the<br />

environment, and lead to both improvements in food<br />

productivity and have side effects on environmental<br />

goods and services. Some report showed that they were<br />

inconsistent, even they were opposite. But the<br />

development of Yujiang County, Jiangxi province<br />

displayed that the production sustainability index has<br />

been increased from 0.0808 to 0.1496 in 50 years.<br />

Meanwhile, the annual raising rate has reached 1.265%<br />

and the sustainability index reached 0.7533 in 1998.<br />

When the agricultural intensification raised 1 unit, the<br />

sustainability would be enhanced by rate of 0.0001. So,<br />

we found the relationship between sustainability and<br />

agricultural intensification was linear one in Yujiang<br />

County. As a more sustainable agriculture seeks to make<br />

the best use of nature’s goods and services, technologies<br />

and practices must be locally adapted and fitted to place<br />

(Pretty, 2007). At the same time, the chemical fertilizer<br />

was applied more and more, the soil fertility could not be


only improved but also increased.<br />

The state of soil nitrogen turned from shortage to over<br />

plus, the state of potassium could be evident change.<br />

These advances were fuelled by modern plant breeding,<br />

improved agronomy and development of inorganic<br />

fertilizers and modern pesticides (Hazel and Wood,<br />

2008). Therefore, in China, growing population, shrinking<br />

arable land demand more attention to improve<br />

sustainability and intensification of agricultural<br />

development.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The study concludes that agricultural sustainability can<br />

increase easily with agricultural intensification growing in<br />

the meantime in China. The relationship between<br />

sustainability and agricultural intensification was linear<br />

one; both theory and practice from the point of view, there<br />

may be intensive and sustainable synchronization; but<br />

there may be separate. Result of the separation of<br />

interaction is mutual restraint. If the two complement<br />

each other, they can continue to progress together.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Brown LR (1995). Who will feed China? New York: W.W. Norton and<br />

Company.<br />

Brown LR, Halweil B (1998). China’s water shortage could shake world<br />

food security. World-watch (7/8): 10-21.<br />

Brown LR (2005). Outgrowing the Earth: the food security challenge in<br />

an age of falling water tables and raising temperature. London, GBR:<br />

Earthscan Publications, Limited.<br />

Conway GW (1997). The doubly green revolution: food for all in the<br />

twenty-first century. Ithaca, Cornell University Press. pp. 225-227.<br />

Chi Weijun. (1990). The theory and method of ecological economy.<br />

Beijing: China Environmental Science Press.<br />

Chen and Wu 2663<br />

Chen Fu (2003). Ecoagriculture. Beijing: China Agricultural press.<br />

Chen Y, Cao C, Shibin Z (1993). A study on the ecoagricultural patterns<br />

of households in hilly regions. Ecoagriculture Res., 1(4): 43-51.<br />

Filson GC (2004). Intensive agriculture and sustainability: a farming<br />

systems analysis. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press, pp. 3-14.<br />

FAO (2004). The ethics of sustainable agricultural intensification. Rome:<br />

FAO ethics series, 3: 1-28.<br />

Huang J, Rozelle SD, Rosegrant MW (1999). China’s food economy to<br />

the 21st century: supply, demand and trade. Econ. Dev. Cult.<br />

Change, 47: 737-766.<br />

He N, Bi K (1986). The introduction and assessment of index systems<br />

design of ecological economy and calculation methods. Rural Ecoenviron.,<br />

4: 28-32.<br />

Hazel P, Wood S (2008). Drivers of change in global agriculture.<br />

Philosophica Transactions of the Royal Society. 363: 495-515.<br />

Hou X (1999). Indicators of sustainable and efficient utilization of<br />

agricultural resources in red and yellow soil of China. Ecoagric. Res.,<br />

7(4): 51-54.<br />

Lele SM (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Dev.,<br />

19 (6): 607-621.<br />

Luo S (2001). Ecoagriculture. Beijing: China Agricultural press.Pingali,<br />

P.L., 1994.In Agricultural Technology: Policy <strong>Issue</strong>s for the Internation<br />

Community (ed. Anderson, J.R.) cab Internation Wallingford, pp.384-<br />

401.<br />

Morse P, McNamara N, Acholo M (2002). Agricultural sustainability:<br />

Comparing external and internal perspectives. J. Sustain. Agric.,<br />

20(4): 29-59.<br />

Niu W (1997). The introduction of sustainable development. Beijing:<br />

Science Press.<br />

Pretty J (2007). Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and<br />

evidence. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society, 363: 447-<br />

465.<br />

Ren T (1995). Studies on the sustainable development of agriculture in<br />

Huang-huai-hai region. Ph D Dissertion of China Agricultural<br />

University.<br />

Shen H (1996). Ecoagriculture. Beijing: China Agricultural press.<br />

The American Society of Agronomy, 1988. 1988 Annual Convention.<br />

Amer. J. Altern. Agric., 3: 4-181.<br />

Wu Z, Chen Y (1996a). A study on agro~ecosysteme valuative index<br />

system and its weight. Eco-Agric. Res., 4(2): 28-31.<br />

Wu Z, Chen Y (1996b). A study on agro-ecosystem evaluative index<br />

system and its weight. Eco-agric. Res., 4(2): 28-31.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2664-2668, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1270<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Water movement and retention in a mollic andosol<br />

mixed with raw mature chickpea residue<br />

Isaiah I. C. Wakindiki 1 * and Morris O. Omondi 2<br />

1 Department of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314 King William’s Town Road 5700 Alice,<br />

South Africa.<br />

2 Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soils, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536-20107 Egerton, Njoro, Kenya.<br />

Accepted 11 October, 2011<br />

Organic manures affect soil properties, however, little is known about raw mature crop residue effects<br />

on water movement and storage in soils of low density like Andosols. It was hypothesized that water<br />

movement and storage in an andosol would be affected if the soil was mixed with raw mature crop<br />

residue. Therefore, the objective was to determine the water status in an andosol mixed with raw<br />

mature chickpea (Cicer arietinum) residue. Two treatments; amended and unamended soils were<br />

investigated. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was determined following the constant head method.<br />

Plant available water was estimated after determining water retention using the pressure plate<br />

apparatus at 3 and 1500 kPa water tension. The saturated hydraulic conductivity was approximately<br />

two-fold higher in the amended compared to the unamended soil. Water retention and plant available<br />

water were not affected by the raw mature chickpea residue. Since the bulk density was �0.9 Mg/m 3 in<br />

both treatments, porosity was similar. Therefore, increased aggregate stability was the most likely<br />

reason for the increased water movement in the amended soil. Addition of crop residues into such as a<br />

soil could be desirable in situations where it is necessary to enhance water flow in the soil profile<br />

without affecting water storage and plant available water, for example to improve the bearing capacity<br />

of wet mollic Andosols during tillage.<br />

Key words: Aggregate stability, soil texture, soil organic matter, water retention, bulk density.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Manures are indispensable boosters for soil fertility and<br />

many studies have demonstrated that plant nutrients like<br />

nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are released upon<br />

their decomposition (Danga et al., 2009). Besides soil<br />

fertility, manures also improve soil physical properties.<br />

Studies have adduced evidence that in coarse textured<br />

soils, CO2, which is a simple product of decomposition,<br />

may be used as a rapid indicator of soil aggregate<br />

stability and water movement. High CO2 evolution<br />

coincided with high aggregate stability and water<br />

movement (Wakindiki and Yegon, 2011). Whereas the<br />

benefits of green manure and decomposition are widely<br />

acknowledged, literature on the physical behavior of soil<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: iwakindiki@ufh.ac.za. Tel:<br />

+27406022096. Fax: +27867582117.<br />

immediately after mixing with undecomposed manure is<br />

limited. Wesseling et al. (2009) performed an experiment<br />

on the effect of raw organic amendment on the<br />

hydrological behaviour of coarse-textured soils and found<br />

out that addition of peat significantly decreased hydraulic<br />

conductivity and increased water retention. Conclusions<br />

from many early experiments assumed that raw organic<br />

matter affected soil water status indirectly through<br />

modification of structure of coarse textured soils. Feustal<br />

and Byers (1936) added varying amounts of raw peat<br />

moss to sand and clay loam and reported increased<br />

available water content for sand but not for clay loam soil.<br />

Likewise, Kelley (1954) included soil structure and<br />

texture but not organic matter in a review of the factors<br />

affecting available water content. Later, Jamison and<br />

Kroth (1958) evaluated 271 soil samples and found<br />

significant positive correlation between soil organic<br />

matter (SOM) content and available water content but


discounted this direct relationship and instead attributed it<br />

to soil texture. More experimental evidence showing a<br />

direct relationship between SOM and water holding<br />

capacity became common in 1990s. Hudson (1994)<br />

demonstrated that water holding capacity was improved<br />

by SOM. Further advances were made at the beginning<br />

of this decade as interest moved from the static view of<br />

soil water parameters like available water and water<br />

holding capacity to dynamic terms of soil water potential.<br />

Buytaert et al. (2002) and Rawls et al. (2003) reported<br />

that SOM was an important soil property influencing soil<br />

water retention compared to soil texture. Organic matter<br />

has a lower density compared to that of mineral soil and<br />

so it has direct impact on the soil physical properties like<br />

bulk density and porosity (Hillel, 1998).<br />

On the other hand, Andosols are characterised by low<br />

bulk density, typically less than 1.0 mg/m 3 in the surface<br />

horizon (FAO/ISRIC/ISSS, 1998). Andosols are generally<br />

fertile and occur in many volcanic regions of the world but<br />

their productivity is often limited by phosphate fixation. To<br />

alleviate the phosphate fixation, manures are often<br />

incorporated (IUSS Working group WRB, 2006). The<br />

unique fractal structure of the dominant clay, allophane,<br />

make Andosols excellent sequesters of soil organic<br />

carbon (Chevallier et al., 2010). Despite the phenomenal<br />

influence of raw organic inputs on the soil physical<br />

properties, few investigations have paid attention to the<br />

effect of undecomposed crop residue on water movement<br />

and retention in Andosols. Wesseling et al. (2009)<br />

cautioned that addition of raw organic matter into soils<br />

increases the risk of ponding and runoff if the hydraulic<br />

conductivity is significantly reduced. It was hypothesized<br />

that water movement and storage in soils with inherent<br />

low bulk density like Andosols would be affected if the<br />

soil is mixed with raw mature crop residue. Therefore, the<br />

objective was to determine saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity, water retention and plant available water in<br />

Andosols immediately after mixing with raw mature<br />

chickpea (Cicer arietinum) residue.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Site management and sampling<br />

Soils were obtained from the top 0.15 m layer in an experimental<br />

site in Njoro in Kenya. The site is located at latitude 0°23′ S,<br />

longitude 35° 35′ E, and 2200 m above sea level. In this humid area<br />

rain falls in two distinct seasons, commonly referred to as long rain<br />

season (LRS) and short rain season (SRS). The LRS is between<br />

April and August and the SRS is between late October and<br />

December. The soils are fertile, well-drained mollic Andosols<br />

(Jaetzold and Schmidt, 1983). In this region, wheat is grown during<br />

the LRS and the land is left fallow during the SRS. So in five<br />

consecutive cropping seasons, between 2003 and 2006, we tested<br />

the possibility of introducing chickpea as a SRS crop and use its<br />

residue to enhance the soil productivity (Danga et al., 2009). So<br />

land that had been fallow for at least five years was ploughed at the<br />

start of the SRS in 2003 and divided into two 0.5 ha portions.<br />

One portion was planted with chickpea and the other portion was<br />

left fallow. These portions are hereafter referred to as “amended”<br />

Wakindiki and Omondi 2665<br />

and “unamended” respectively. At the end of the crop growing<br />

season (SRS, 2003), mature chickpea was harvested and its dry<br />

residue incorporated using hand tools back into the upper 0.15 m<br />

soil layer in readiness for the wheat growing season during the LRS<br />

in 2004. The incorporated dry mature chickpea residue had a C:N<br />

ratio of 20:1 (Wakindiki and Yegon, 2011). Immediately after<br />

incorporating the residue two batches; undisturbed and disturbed<br />

soil samples were collected from the amended and unamended<br />

portions. Undisturbed samples for the determination of saturated<br />

hydraulic conductivity were collected in aluminium cylinders with<br />

0.05 m diameter and 0.05 m height while samples for the<br />

determination of moisture retention were collected in aluminium<br />

cylinders with 0.05 m diameter and 0.03 m height. Each cylinder<br />

was secured with lids on both open sides during transportation. The<br />

disturbed soil samples, for the determination of soil texture and<br />

aggregate stability, were collected using a spade from 0 to 0.15 m<br />

layer and put in paper bags.<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity, moisture retention and plant<br />

available water<br />

The lids were carefully removed from the undisturbed soil cores.<br />

One side of each core was then covered with cheesecloth. The<br />

samples were slowly saturated with tap water from below for 48 h.<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat, cm/h) was then determined<br />

using the constant head method (Reynods and Elrick, 2002) and<br />

estimated using Equation 1:<br />

Q K sat<br />

A<br />

�h � L�<br />

L<br />

t<br />

� (1)<br />

Where Q was the volume of water that passed through each core in<br />

time t, L was the length of the core, A was the cross section area of<br />

the core, and h was the height of water on the core. Afterwards,<br />

core samples were oven-dried at 105°C for 48 h and weighed to<br />

determine the dry bulk density of the soil as described by Grossman<br />

and Reinsch (2002). The bulk density �b, mg/m 3 was then<br />

calculated using Equation 2:<br />

M<br />

s � b �<br />

(2)<br />

Vt<br />

Where Ms was the mass of oven dry soil and Vt was the total<br />

volume of the core sample. Water retention at 3 and 1500 kPa was<br />

determined using the pressure plate apparatus (Dane and<br />

Hopmans, 2002). The soil samples were removed from the<br />

pressure plate apparatus after equilibration and their respective<br />

moisture contents�, mg/mg, was determined gravimetrically using<br />

Equation 3:<br />

M<br />

M<br />

w � �<br />

(3)<br />

s<br />

Where Mw was the mass of water and Ms was the mass of dry soil.<br />

The gravimetric water content was then converted to volumetric<br />

water content by multiplying it with the bulk density. The difference<br />

between water content at 3 and 1500 kPa moisture tensions was<br />

assumed to be the plant available water.<br />

Soil texture and aggregate stability<br />

The soil texture was determined on the disturbed samples following


2666 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Volumetric water content (cm 3 /cm 3 )<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm/h)<br />

Figure 1. Saturated hydraulic conductivity in the unamended and amended soils. Different letters<br />

above the treatment values indicate significant difference (P � 0.05). Bars indicate standard error.<br />

Figure 2. Volumetric water content in the unamended and amended soils at 3 and 1500 kPa.<br />

Different lowercase letters above the treatment values at the same matric suction and different<br />

uppercase letters above the treatment values at different matric suctions indicate significant<br />

difference (P = 0.05). Bars indicate standard error.<br />

the hydrometer method as described by Gee and Or (2002). The<br />

aggregate fraction sizes were determined by sieving the soil<br />

samples in a net of sieves of 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.1 mm diameter.<br />

The soil in each sieve was then weighed and expressed as a<br />

percentage of the total weight of the soil. The aggregate stability<br />

was expressed by calculating the mean weight diameter (MWD,<br />

mm) of the six classes:<br />

6<br />

� � i i<br />

i�1<br />

w x<br />

MWD (4)<br />

Where wi was the weight fraction of aggregates in the size class i<br />

with mean diameter x (Le Bissonnais, 1996).<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The means were analyzed using the t-test (Steel and Torrie, 1980).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The saturated hydraulic conductivity in the amended soil<br />

was approximately two-fold higher compared to that in<br />

the unamended soil (Figure 1). Therefore, addition of raw<br />

mature chickpea residue made it easier for the water to<br />

flow in the soil under saturated conditions. However,<br />

water retention (Figure 2) and plant available water<br />

(Figure 3) were not significantly affected by the incorpora-


Plant available water (%)<br />

Wakindiki and Omondi 2667<br />

Figure 3. Plant available water in the unamended and amended soils. Different letters above the<br />

treatment values indicate significant difference (P = 0.05). Bars indicate standard error.<br />

Table 1. Some physical properties of the mollic andosol used in the study.<br />

Soil<br />

Bulk density<br />

Mg/m<br />

% Mean weight diameter<br />

3 Clay Silt Sand<br />

Unamended 0.96 35 43 22 0.35 a<br />

Amended 0.96 35 43 22 1.25 b<br />

Different letter following mean weight diameter value indicate a significant difference. (P = 0.05).<br />

-tion of the chickpea residue. The aggregate stability in<br />

the amended soil was significantly higher than in the<br />

unamended soil, while the bulk density, which was �0.9<br />

mg/m 3 was not affected by the amendment (Table 1).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity indicates the ease with<br />

which soil pores in saturated soil permit water to move.<br />

Quantitatively, it measures the capacity of a saturated<br />

soil to transmit water under the influence of hydraulic<br />

gradient (Hillel, 1998). The same hydraulic gradient was<br />

maintained in both treatments. Therefore a possible<br />

reason for the increased saturated hydraulic conductivity<br />

in the amended soil was increased aggregate stability<br />

(Table 1). Since the bulk density was approximately 0.9<br />

mg/m 3 in both treatments, there was no increase in<br />

porosity. Similarly, Lado et al. (2004) found that in the<br />

absence of raindrop impact, the saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity of the soil was enhanced by organic matter.<br />

However, contradicting results were reported in sand<br />

mixtures by Wesseling et al. (2009), suggesting that<br />

organic matter decreased saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity. In our experiment the soil was a silty clay<br />

loam (Table 1), suggesting that in finer soils, raw<br />

manures enhance saturated hydraulic conductivity.<br />

In general, the amount of water retained in any soil at<br />

low values of moisture tension depends primarily upon<br />

the gravitational potential, while at higher moisture<br />

tension, adsorptive potential become dominant (Hillel,<br />

1998; Dane and Hopmans, 2002). In our study, water<br />

retention for both treatments was not significantly<br />

different (Figure 2). Likewise, the plant available water for<br />

both treatments was similar (Figure 3). Hitherto, many<br />

experiments have demonstrated enhanced water<br />

retention when SOM is increased in soils (Jamison and<br />

Kroth, 1958; Rawls et al., 2003; Wesseling et al., 2009)<br />

but our results contrast these earlier findings probably<br />

because the soil texture was finer. Therefore, addition of<br />

crop residues into fine-textured soil could be desirable in<br />

situations where it is necessary to enhance water flow in


2668 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

the soil profile without affecting the plant available water<br />

capacity. For example, Andosols are known to be highly<br />

susceptible to compaction due to their low bearing<br />

capacity when highly hydrated (IUSS Working group<br />

WRB, 2006). So it might be reasonable to incorporate<br />

crop residues to enhance water transmission and release<br />

and facilitate operations like tillage. Nonetheless there is<br />

little evidence to support this hypothesis.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We acknowledge the provision of chickpea seeds and the<br />

pressure plate apparatus by the International Crop<br />

Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT),<br />

Nairobi and the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute<br />

(KARI), Njoro, respectively.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Buytaert W, Deckers J, Dercon G, De BieÁvre B, Poesen J, Govers G<br />

(2002). Impact of land use changes on the hydrological properties of<br />

volcanic ash soils in South Ecuador. Soil Use Manage., 18: 94-100.<br />

Chevallier T, Woignier T, Toucet J, Blanchart E (2010). Organic carbon<br />

stabilization in the fractal pore structure of Andosols. Geoderma, 159:<br />

182–188.<br />

Dane JH, Hopmans JW (2002). Water retention and storage. In Dane<br />

and Topp (Eds) Methods of soil analysis Part 4 Physical methods,<br />

Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Book Ser., 5: 671-720.<br />

Danga BO, Ouma JP, Wakindiki IIC, Bar-Tal A (2009). Legume-wheat<br />

rotation effects on residual soil moisture, nitrogen and wheat yield in<br />

tropical regions. Adv. Agron., 101: 315-349.<br />

FAO/ISRIC/ISSS (1998). World Ref. Base Soil Resour., World Soil<br />

Resour. Rep., 84. Rome: FAO.<br />

Feustal IC, Byers HG (1936). The Comparative Moisture-Absorbing and<br />

Moisture-Retaining Capacities of Peat and Soil Mixtures. USDA<br />

Tech. Bull., pp. 532.<br />

Gee GW, Or D (2002). Particle size analysis. In Dane and Topp (Eds)<br />

Methods of soil analysis Part 4 Physical methods, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.<br />

Book Ser., 5: 255-293.<br />

Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002). Bulk density and linear extensibility.<br />

In Dane and Topp (Eds) Methods of soil analysis Part 4 Physical<br />

methods, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Book Ser., 5: 201-228.<br />

Hillel D (1998). Environ. Soil Phys. San Diego: Acad. Press.<br />

Hudson BD (1994): Soil organic matter and available water capacity. J.<br />

Soil Water Conserv. 49: 189-194.<br />

IUSS WORKING GROUP WRB. (2006). World Ref. Base Soil Resour.,<br />

World Soil Resour. Rep, 103. Rome: FAO.<br />

Jaetzold R, Schmidt H (1983). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya.<br />

Vol. II Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Part B.<br />

Central Kenya. Nairobi: Minist. Agric.<br />

Jamison VC, Kroth EM (1958). Available moisture storage capacity in<br />

relation to texture composition and organic matter content of several<br />

Missouri soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 22: 189–192.<br />

Kelley OJ (1954). Requirement and availability of water. Adv. Agron., 6:<br />

67-94.<br />

Lado M, Paz A, Ben-Hur M (2004). Organic matter and aggregate-size<br />

interactions in saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,<br />

68:234-242.<br />

Le Bissonnais Y (1996). Aggregate stability and assessment of soil<br />

crust ability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology. Euro. J. Soil<br />

Sci., 47: 425-437.<br />

Rawls JW, Pachespky YA, Ritchie JC, Sobecki TM, Bloodworth H<br />

(2003). Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention.<br />

Geoderma, 116: 61-76.<br />

Reynods WD, Elrick DE (2002). Constant head soil core (Tank) method.<br />

In Dane and Topp (Eds) Methods of soil analysis Part 4 Physical<br />

methods, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Book Ser., 5, 804-808.<br />

Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a<br />

Biometrical Approach. New York, McGraw-Hill.<br />

Wakindiki IIC, Yegon R (2011). Effect of decomposition intensity of<br />

incorporated chickpea manure on stability and saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity of a clay loam and clay soil. Afri. J. Agric. Res., 6: 1120-<br />

1127.<br />

Wesseling JG, Stoof CR, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Dekker LW (2009).<br />

The effect of soil texture and organic amendment on the hydrological<br />

behaviour of coarse-textured soils. Soil Use Manage., 25: 274–283.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2669-2673, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.454<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

In vitro propagation of native Ornithogalum species in<br />

West Mediterrenean region of Turkey<br />

Ozgul Karaguzel*, Ayse Kaya, Beyza Biner and Koksal Aydinsakir<br />

Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, Antalya, Turkey.<br />

Accepted 17th April, 2012<br />

Ornithogalum is a popular genus especially, as an ornamental plant. In this study, eight native<br />

Ornithogalum species grown in West Mediterrenean Region of Turkey were cultured on MS media<br />

supplemented with combinations of BAP (1.0, 2.0, 4.0 mg L -1 ) and NAA (0.25, 0.50 mg L -1 ). The results<br />

indicated that the highest rate of proliferation was induced on Murashige and Skoog (MS) to which<br />

4 mg L -1 BAP + 0.5 mg L -1 NAA (4.97 bulblets/explant) while the lowest rate of bulblet proliferation was<br />

obtained in 2 mg L -1 BAP + 0.25 mg L -1 NAA (2.27 bulblets/explant). Ornithogalum umbellatum showed<br />

the highest bulblet regeneration within the species. The regenerated bulblets were transferred into<br />

plastic viols containing mixture of peat moss and perlite (1:1) after 5 months.<br />

Key words: Ornithogalum spp, bulb scale explant, bulblet regeneration, in vitro propagation.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The genus, Ornithogalum which belongs to family<br />

Hyacinthaceae (Şabudak, 1999), was widely grown in<br />

Africa, Mediterrenean, Europa and Asia naturally and<br />

contains nearly 150 species in the world (Petanidou and<br />

Vujic, 2007). Fourty four species has been represented in<br />

Turkey and 17 species of them are endemic (Davis,<br />

1984; Ekim et al., 2000; Dusen and Deniz, 2005; Uysal et<br />

al., 2005). Ornithogalum species is an impressive<br />

ornamental plant due to its attractive white flowers and<br />

used as medicinal plants (Asimgil, 2003). Some<br />

Ornithogalum species (Ornithogalum comosum L.,<br />

Ornithogalum lanceolatum Labill., Ornithogalum latifolium<br />

Baker, Ornithogalum pyrenaicum L., O. narborense L.,<br />

Ornithogalum oligophyllum Clarke and Ornithogalum<br />

sibthorpii W.Greuter) have potentially an economic<br />

importance since it is consumed as vegetable in Turkey<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: tezkara@yahoo.com.<br />

Abbreviations: BA, Benzyl adenin; BAP, benzyl amino purin;<br />

NAA, naphthalene acetic acid; NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite;<br />

KOH, potassium hydroxide; HCl, hydrochloric acid.<br />

(Baytop, 1997), whereas, it has not sufficently been<br />

considered to propagation.<br />

Ornithogalum species are vegetatively propagated<br />

using mother bulbs, but the rate of propagation of these<br />

bulbs is very slow. Approximetly 4 to 6 bulblets are<br />

annualy produced from a mother bulb (Naik and Nayak,<br />

2005). Therefore in vitro techniques were used for rapid<br />

propagation of bulbs. Several studies have been carried<br />

out in vitro micro-propagation protocols of some culture<br />

Ornithogalum species (Hussey, 1976; Nel, 1981;<br />

Yanagawa and Ito, 1988; Rensburg et al., 1989; Landby<br />

and Neiderwieser, 1992; Ziv and Lilien-Kipnes, 2000;<br />

Karuiki and Kako, 2003; Malabadi and van Staden, 2004;<br />

Naik and Nayak, 2005; Suh et al., 2005). At the same<br />

time, micro-propagation of some native Ornithogalum<br />

species such as O. umbellatum L. (Nayak and Sen,<br />

1995), O. ulouphyllum Hand-Mazz (Ozel et al., 2008), O.<br />

plathyllum Boiss (Ipek et al., 2006), O. oligophyllum E.<br />

D.Clarke (Ozel and Khawar, 2007) has been reported.<br />

However, there are no reports in vitro for the propagation<br />

a large number of the native Ornithogalum species up to<br />

now. In the present study, a new propagation protocol for<br />

bulblet regeneration from bulb scale explants of eight<br />

native Ornithogalum species in the West Mediterranean


2670 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Region of Turkey was investigated.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Plant material and explant source<br />

The Ornithogalum species (O. umbellatum L., O. oligophyllum E. C.<br />

Clarke, O. sigmoideum Freyn. Sint., O. narborense L., O.<br />

pyrenaicum L., O. lanceolatum Labill., O. isauricum O. D. Düşen<br />

and H. Sümbül ‘endemic’ and O. nutans L.) were collected between<br />

April and June, 2006 in West Mediterranean Region of Turkey.<br />

Ornithogalum bulbs were washed under running tap water for<br />

half an hour to remove the mud and dirt. Firstly, the bulbs were<br />

sterilized by treatment for 10 min in a 10% commercial bleach (5 to<br />

6% NaOCl) + 172 ml Tween 20 per 100 ml. Then for 30 min in 80%<br />

commercial bleach (5 to 6% NaOCl) + 172 ml Tween 20 per 100 ml<br />

commercial bleach with continuous stirring using magnetic stirrer.<br />

Finally, they were rinsed in sterile distil water thrice. After removing<br />

the outer scales of the bulbs, explants were longitudianally cut<br />

under sterile conditions to obtain about 1 to 2 cm four scale<br />

segments including the basal plate.<br />

Medium and culture conditions<br />

The explants were cultured on MS medium (Murashige and Skoog,<br />

1962), supplemented with 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 mg L -1 BAP and 0.25,<br />

0.50 mg L -1 NAA. The pH values of all media was adjusted to 5.7<br />

with 1 N KOH or 1 N HCl before adding 30 g L -1 sucrose and 7 g L -1<br />

agar (Sigma, 1296) and autoclaved at 1.2 atm and at 121°C for 20<br />

min. Petri dishes were wrapped with strech film and then placed at<br />

25 ± 1°C by 16 h photoperiod under 100 µmol m -2 s -1 light intensity<br />

supplied with white fluorescent light. The bulblets were subcultured<br />

every month onto fresh medium for aproximately three months and<br />

later transferred to the MS medium containing no plant growth<br />

regulators for induction of rooting. Each treatment consisted of 5<br />

explants and the experiments were repeated thrice.<br />

Data collection and statistical analysis<br />

The number of bulbs per explant and survival rate of bulblet<br />

transfered to soil were determined in eight different Ornithogalum<br />

species at the end of the experiment. All data were statistically<br />

analyzed according to a completely randomized design (Gomez<br />

and Gomez, 1984) and variance analysis (ANOVA) was done.<br />

Means were calculated and Duncan’s multiple range test at a<br />

significance level of 5% was compared.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Explants cultured on MS medium supplemented with<br />

different combinations of plant growth regulators<br />

displayed proliferation within 15 to 20 days, by small<br />

bulblets which were developed on the scales. Bulblets<br />

were produced directly on the bulb scales or the basal<br />

plates (Figure 1). The results indicated that the effect of<br />

plant growth regulators on the number of bulblet<br />

regeneration for each species were statistically different<br />

(P


Figure 1. Bulblet regeneration from 4 scale explants eight different<br />

Ornithogalum species “a) 4.0 mg L -1 BAP+0.50 mg L -1 NAA O. umbellatum, b)<br />

1.0 mg L -1 BAP+ 0.25 mg L -1 NAA O. oligophyllum, c) 1.0 mg L -1 BAP+<br />

0.25 mg L -1 NAA O. sigmoideum, d) 4.0 mg L -1 BAP+0.25 mg L -1 NAA O.<br />

narborense, e) 0 mg L -1 BAP+ 0.50 mg L -1 NAA O. lanceolatum, f) 1.0 mg L -1<br />

BAP+ 0.50 mg L -1 NAA O. isauricum, g) 1.0 mg L -1 BAP+ 0.50 mg L -1 NAA O.<br />

nutans, h) 1.0 mg L -1 l BAP+ 0.25 mg L -1 NAA O. pyrenaicum”.<br />

Karaguzel et al. 2671


2672 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Effects of growth regulators on bulblet regeneration from 4 scales and mean number of bulblets per explant on Ornithogalum species.<br />

Species<br />

Mean number of bulblets per explant<br />

Plant growth regulators (mg L -1)<br />

1 BAP + 0.25 NAA 1 BAP+0.5 NAA 2 BAP + 0.25 NAA 2 BAP + 0.5 NAA 4 BAP + 0.25 NAA 4 BAP + 0.5 NAA<br />

Mean of species<br />

Survival rate of bulblet<br />

transfered to soil (%)<br />

O. umbellatum 19.00 Aax 7.00 Ba 3.67 Ba 6.67 Ba 6.67 Ba 21.67 Aa 10.78 ** 51<br />

O.oligophyllum 14.33 Ab 5.33 Bac 4.00 Ba 5.00 Bab 2.00 Bbc 4.33 Bbc 5.83 29<br />

O.sigmoideum 3.00 Ac 2.33 Abd 2.67 Aa 1.67 Abc 2.33 Ab 4.33 Ab 2.72 58<br />

O.narborense 3.67 ABc 6.33 Aab 4.00 Aba 4.33 ABac 1.67 Bb 6.33 Ab 4.39 67<br />

O.pyrenaicum 1.33 Ac 1.67 Acd 2.67 Aa 1.67 Abc 2.67 Abc 2.33 Abc 2.06 41<br />

O.lanceolatum 3.00 Bc 7.33 Aa 2.33 Ba 2.67 Bac 2.67 Bb 5.67 ABb 3.94 28<br />

O.isauricum (endemic) 0.00 Ac 1.33 Acd 0.00 Aa 1.33 Abc 2.67 Ac 0.00 Ac 0.89 20<br />

O.nutans 0.00 Ac 0.00 Ad 0.00A a 0.00 Ac 0.00 Ac 0.67 Ac 0.11 100<br />

Mean of plant growth regulators 4.67 ** 3.97 2.27 2.77 2.30 4.97 3.49<br />

Mean separation within columns by Duncan’s multiple range test, at 0.05 level; ns No statistical difference at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, * Statistical difference at P < 0.05, ** Statistical difference at P < 0.01, X :<br />

capitals show the comparison between the averages given horizontally (along the line) and the small characters show the comparison between the averages given vertically (along the column).<br />

Figure 2. Plants growth from bulblets in growing media containing peat<br />

moss and perlite (1:1).


obtained with a medium containing 2.0 mg L -1<br />

BAP + 0.50 mg L -1 NAA. Number of bulblet per plant was<br />

4.83. (Ozel et al., 2008). In our study, number of bulblet<br />

per plant in O.umbelatum was 21.67 while, 2.06 to 5.83<br />

values were recorded in the other excluded species that<br />

encountered infection. The most constructive results<br />

were also obtained from MS medium with 2.0 mg L -1<br />

BA + 1.0 mg L -1 NAA (10.4 bulblets/explant) in O. virens<br />

as reported by Naik and Nayak (2005). Correspondingly,<br />

a remarkable increase in the regeneration of cultured O.<br />

arabicum bulblets by 5.0 mg L -1 BA + 0.01 mg L -1 NAA on<br />

solid White’s medium was detected (Yanagawa and Ito,<br />

1988). In other studies, development of the highest<br />

number of shoots from bulb scale explants on<br />

Ornithogalum hybrid cultured on MS medium with<br />

1.5 mg L -1 BA + 0.50 mg L -1 NAA was also reported (Suh<br />

et al., 2005). In our present study, the highest bulblet<br />

formation was achieved by 4.0 mg L -1 BAP + 0.50 mg L -1<br />

NAA at eight different Ornithogalum species. These<br />

obtained incoherent findings can be associated with<br />

differences of the genotypes, explants and<br />

concentrations of growth regulators used in mediums.<br />

During the studies, bacterial and fungal contaminations<br />

were observed on O. nutans and O. isauricum culture<br />

medium and limited number of bulblets were obtained<br />

from these species. The presence of heavy bacterial and<br />

fungal contamination risks were reported if the bulbs will<br />

be used as a source of explant (Langens-Gerrits et al.,<br />

1998; Ziv and Lilien-Kipnis, 2000; Mirici et al., 2005).<br />

Also, Karaoğlu (2010) stated that despite all surface<br />

sterilizations done in some bulbous plants, diseases were<br />

not prevented and they resulted from endogenic plants.<br />

In this study, it was found that the number of bulblets<br />

were significiantly increased with the addition BA and<br />

NAA into medium culture. In conclusion, from the ongoing<br />

results, it may be concluded that a simple and rapid<br />

protocol can be established for propagation of eight<br />

Ornithogalum species which were grown in West<br />

Mediterranean Region of Turkey.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This research was supported by the Scientific and<br />

Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK; Project<br />

no TOVAG 104O327). The authors wish to thank Prof.<br />

Dr. İbrahim BAKTIR, Prof. Dr. Osman Karagüzel and<br />

Associate Prof. Dr. Ö. Baysal.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Asimgil A (2003). Şifali Bitkiler. Hayat-Sağlik 352 s, (in Turkish).<br />

Baytop T (1997). Türkçe Bitki Adlari Sözlüğü, Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih<br />

Yüksek Kurumu, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayinlari, 578, Ankara, (in Turkish).<br />

Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS (1975). Establishment of an efficient<br />

medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments<br />

on the nitrogen sources. Sci. Sin., 18: 659-668.<br />

Davis PH (1984). Flora of Turkey and The East Agean Islands,<br />

University Pres Edinburgh, Vol.:8.<br />

Karaguzel et al. 2673<br />

Düşen O, Deniz İG (2005). Ornithogalum sumbulianum<br />

(Hyacinthaceae), a new endemic species from South West Anatolia.<br />

Pak .J. Bot., 36(4): 33-36.<br />

Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z, Adigüzel N (2000).<br />

Türkiye Bitkileri Kirmizi Kitabi. (Eğrelti ve tohumlu Bitkiler),<br />

Ankara,196 s, (in Turkish).<br />

Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural<br />

research. In: An Int. Rice Res. Inst. Book. John Wiley and Sons Inc.,<br />

New York, p. 680.<br />

Hussey G (1976) Plantlet regeneration from callus and parent tissue in<br />

Ornithogalum thyrosoides. J. of Exp. Bot., 27(97): 375-380.<br />

Karaoğlu C (2010). Soğanli Bitkiler ve In vitro Hizli Çoğaltim. Tarla<br />

Bitkileri Merkez Araştirma Enstitüsü Dergisi 19(1-2):24-29.<br />

Kariuki W, Kako S (2003). Micropropagation of Ornithogalum<br />

saundersiae Bak. Acta Hort., 624: 521-526.<br />

Landby PA, Neiderwieser JG (1992). In vitro propagation of<br />

Ornithogalum 'Rollow'. Afr. Soc. Hort. Sci., 2(1):50-54.<br />

Langens-Gerrits M, Albers M, Klerk GJ (1998). Hot water treatment<br />

before tissue culture reduces initial contamination in Lilium and Acer.<br />

Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 52: 75-77.<br />

Malabadi RB, Van Staden J (2004). Regeneration of Ornithogalum in<br />

vitro. Afr. J. Bot., 70(4): 618-621.<br />

Murashige T., F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and<br />

bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15: 473–497.<br />

Mirici S, Parmaksiz İ, Özcan S, Sancak C, Uranbey S, Sarihan E.O,<br />

Gümüşcü A, Gürbüz B, Arslan N (2005). Efficient in vitro bulblet<br />

regeneration from immature embryos of endangered Stenbergia<br />

fischeriana. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 80: 239-246.<br />

Nasircilar, A, Mirici, S, Karagüzel, Ö, Eren, Ö, Baktir, İ (2011). In vitro<br />

propagation of endemic and endangered Muscari mirum from<br />

different explant types. Turk. J. Bot., 35: 37-43.<br />

Nel DD (1981). Rapid propagation of Ornithogalum hybrid in vitro.<br />

Agroplantae, 13(3): 83-84.<br />

Nayak S, Sen S (1995). In vitro propagation of Ornithogalum<br />

umbellatum through direct organogenesis. Ind. J. Exp. Bio., 33(2):<br />

144-146.<br />

Naik PK, Nayak S (2005). Different modes of plant regeneration and<br />

factors affecting in vitro bulblet production in Ornithogalum virens.<br />

Sci. Asia, 31: 409-414.<br />

Ozel ÇA, Khawar KM (2007). In vitro bulblet regeneration of<br />

Ornithogalum oligophyllum E.D. Clarke Using twing scale bulb<br />

explants. propagation of ornamental plants. Propag. Ornam. Plants,<br />

7(2): 82-88.<br />

Ozel ÇA, Khawar KM, Karaman S, Ateş MA, Arslan O (2008). Efficient<br />

in vitro multiplication in Ornithogalum ulouphyllum Hand.-Mazz. from<br />

twin scale explants. Sci. Hort., 116: 109-112.<br />

Petanidou T, Vujic A (2007). Genetic diversity & mutual dependence of<br />

Ornithogalum plants and Merodon hoverflies across a climatic<br />

gradient within the Mediterranean.http://www.alarmproject.net<br />

net.ufz.de/documents/fsn_protocol_2007/2007_03.pdf.<br />

Rensburg JGJ, Vcelar BM, Landby PA (1989). Micropropagation of<br />

Ornithogalum maculatum. South Afr. J. Bot., 55(1): 137-139.<br />

Suh KJ, Lee W, Lee A (2005). New plantlet proliferation and bulbing<br />

promotion in vitro of Ornithogalum hybrid. Acta Hort., 683: 155-163.<br />

Şabudak T (1999). Trakya bölgesinde yetişen Ornithogalum umbellatum<br />

(Hyacinthaceae) L. bitkisinin kimyasal bakimdan incelenmesi. Trakya<br />

Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. p.104, (in<br />

Turkish).<br />

Uysal T, Ertuğrul K, Dural H (2005). A new species of Ornithogalum<br />

(Liliaceae) from South Anatolia, Turkey. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 148:<br />

501–504.<br />

Yanagawa T, Ito I (1988). Differences in the capacity for bulblet<br />

regeneration between bulb scale explants excised from different parts<br />

of Ornithogalum bulbs. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci., 57(3): 454-461.<br />

Zaidi N, Khan NH, Zafar F, Zafar SI (2000). Bulbous and cormous<br />

monocotyledonus ornamental plants in vitro. Quat. Sci. Vis., 6(1): 58-<br />

73.<br />

Ziv M, Lilien-Kipnes H (2000). Bud regeneration from inflorescense<br />

explants for rapid propagation of geophytes in vitro. Plant Cell Rep.,<br />

19(9): 845-850.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2674-2678, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1299<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Determination of associations between three<br />

morphological and two cytological traits of yams<br />

(Dioscorea spp.) using canonical correlation analysis<br />

P. E. Norman 1 *, P. Tongoona 2 and P. E. Shanahan 3<br />

1 Njala Agricultural Research Center (NARC), PMB 540, Freetown, Sierra Leone.<br />

2 Africa Center for Crop Improvement (ACCI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209,<br />

South Africa.<br />

3 Agricultural Plant Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.<br />

Accepted 30 March, 2012<br />

Agro-morphological traits of plants may directly or indirectly depend on cytological traits. Thus, the<br />

determination of associations between morphological traits (absence or presence of wings, number of<br />

stems per plant and wing colour of stem) and cytological traits (DNA content and ploidy level) of yams<br />

were investigated using canonical correlation analysis. This multivariate technique is used in wide<br />

fields of study to quantify the mathematical relationships between multiple sets of independent and<br />

dependent traits or properties. Canonical weights and loadings indicated that DNA content (pg) had the<br />

highest contribution to the variation of the morphological traits (presence of wings, number of stems<br />

per plant and wing colour) compared with ploidy level. It was found that cytological traits accounted for<br />

0.09 to 0.17% of the variation in the selected morphological traits. The first and second canonical<br />

correlations exhibited 60.91 and 39.09% overlapping variance of the canonical variate sets respectively.<br />

The first and second canonical variates extracted 0.57 and 4.43% of the total variance in the cytological<br />

trait set. The study demonstrated the successful determination of complex inter-relationships between<br />

morphological and cytological traits.<br />

Key words: Canonical correlation, morphological traits, cytological traits, yam.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is one of several<br />

multivariate analysis techniques used to determine the<br />

overall correlation between two sets of traits (X and Y).<br />

Canonical correlation is a generalization of multiple<br />

regression analysis with more than one trait in the<br />

independent and dependent trait sets. The basic principle<br />

of the technique is to determine how much variance in<br />

one set of traits is accounted for by the other set along<br />

one or more axes (Tabachnick and Fidell, 2001). In<br />

contrast to many other techniques, any of the two sets of<br />

traits is a potential candidate to be used as dependent or<br />

independent traits. Canonical correlation makes possible<br />

several combinations of two trait sets. The number of<br />

combinations depends on the number of traits in the<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: penorman2008@yahoo.com.<br />

smaller trait set (Tabachnick and Fidell, 2001; Keskin and<br />

Yasar, 2007). Canonical correlation analysis has been<br />

widely applied in various fields such as the plant<br />

sciences, biology, chemistry, social and management<br />

sciences. However, there is scant information available<br />

on the interrelationship between morphological and<br />

cytological traits of yams. The main aim of this study was<br />

to determine the level of association between<br />

morphological and cytological traits of yams using<br />

canonical correlation analysis. The hypothesis being<br />

tested was that correlation exists between the agromorphological<br />

and cytological traits used in the two<br />

methods of classification.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

A total of five traits including three morphological (absence or


Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the cytological and morphological traits.<br />

Traits Mean ± SE Minimum Maximum<br />

DNA (pg) 1.858 ± 0.013 1.588 2.118<br />

Ploidy 3.962 ± 0.091 2.000 6.000<br />

APW 0.846 ± 0.051 0.000 1.000<br />

NS 1.846 ± 0.108 1.000 5.000<br />

WC 1.404 ± 0.117 0.000 3.000<br />

DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid content (pg); Ploidy level; APW: absence or presence of wings; NS: number of<br />

stems per plant; and WC: wing colour.<br />

presence of wings, number of stems per plant and wing colour of<br />

stem) and two cytological (DNA content and ploidy level) traits were<br />

used. The morphological traits were considered as the dependent<br />

Y-trait set, whereas the cytological traits were taken as the<br />

independent X-trait set. To obtain the maximum correlations<br />

between two sets of traits, two linear combinations were designed<br />

as follows:<br />

Wi = ai1X1 + ai2X2 + -------- + aipXp (1)<br />

Vi = bi1Y1 + bi2Y2 + -------- + biqYq (2)<br />

The symbols W and V represents canonical variates; a and b are<br />

canonical coefficients of the X and Y trait sets; and p (two traits)<br />

and q (three traits) are the number of traits in the X and Y trait sets,<br />

respectively. The estimation of the vector coefficients, a and b, was<br />

done according to Tabachnick and Fidell (2001).<br />

To generate the canonical correlation for both sets of traits, the<br />

following formulae were used:<br />

var (W) = aʹCov (X) a (3)<br />

var (V) = bʹCov (Y) b (4)<br />

Where var (W) represents variance of the canonical variate W; var<br />

(V) is the variance of the covariate V; Cwv is the canonical<br />

correlation between the X and Y trait sets; Cov (Y) and Cov (X) are<br />

the covariances of the traits in the X and Y trait sets, respectively<br />

(Keskin and Yasar, 2007).<br />

The relationship of a set of canonical variate is maximized when<br />

the correlation (r-value) of the p and q is small. The first set of<br />

canonical variate (W1 and V1) gives the highest correlation and is<br />

considered the most important. The correlation between W2 and V2<br />

is only maximized where the traits measured are uncorrelated to W1<br />

and V1. Similarly, the correlation between W3 and V3 is maximized if<br />

traits are not correlated with W1, V1, W2 and V2 (Manly, 1994). The<br />

canonical correlation analysis procedure (cancorrelation procedure)<br />

in Genstat version 12.1 was used to generate the relationships<br />

between sets of traits (Payne et al., 2009). The squared canonical<br />

correlation (also known as canonical roots or eigen-values)<br />

represents the amount of variance in one canonical variate<br />

accounted for by the other canonical variate (Hair et al., 1998). The<br />

standardized coefficients are similar to the standardized regression<br />

coefficients in multiple regression, which gives an indication of the<br />

relative importance of the independent traits in determining the<br />

value of dependent traits. In order to determine the amount of<br />

variance in one set of traits that is accounted for by another set of<br />

traits, Sharma (1996) suggested the estimation of the redundancy<br />

(5)<br />

Norman et al. 2675<br />

measure (RM) for each canonical correlation. The equation for the<br />

RM is shown as follows:<br />

RMvi/wi = AV (Y/Vi) x Ci 2 (6)<br />

AV (Y/Vi) = [∑ q LYij 2 /q] (7)<br />

Where AV (Y/Vi) = the averaged variance in Y traits that is<br />

accounted for by the canonical variate Vi. LYij 2 = the loading of the<br />

jth Y trait on the ith canonical variate Vi; q = the number of traits in<br />

canonical variates; Ci 2 = the shared variance between Vi and Wi; Wi<br />

and Vi are canonical variates of Y and X trait sets, respectively.<br />

This estimate is necessary because a large canonical correlation<br />

does not always imply powerful relationship between two sets of<br />

traits. Canonical correlation maximizes the estimate of correlation<br />

between linear combinations of traits in the two sets, but does not<br />

maximize the amount of variance accounted for in one set of traits<br />

by the other set of traits. Thus, the variance in one set of traits<br />

accounted for by the other set is obtained through the RM (Akbas<br />

and Takma, 2005).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation<br />

coefficient (r) for the six traits are presented in Tables 1<br />

and 2, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients<br />

for the traits ranged between -0.3928 and 0.7798 and<br />

were statistically significant (p


2676 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between cytological and morphological traits.<br />

DNA Ploidy APW NS<br />

Ploidy 0.7798**<br />

APW -0.3928** -0.2715 ns<br />

NS 0.2882* 0.3468** -0.4727**<br />

WC -0.3578** -0.2895* 0.7143** 0.1755 ns<br />

*: p< 0.05, **: p< 0.01, ns: not significant. DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid content (pg); Ploidy level; APW:<br />

absence or presence of wings; NS: number of stems per plant; and WC: wing colour.<br />

Table 3. Canonical correlations between canonical variates.<br />

Canonical<br />

variates<br />

Canonical<br />

correlations<br />

Squared canonical<br />

correlation<br />

%<br />

correlation<br />

Cumulative %<br />

correlation<br />

Likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

Probability Pr<br />

> F<br />

W1V1 0.4441 0.1972 69.91 69.91 0.79 0.001<br />

W2V2 0.2850 0.0812 39.09 100.0 0.89 0.005<br />

Table 4. Non-standardized coefficients of the respective traits of the canonical variates.<br />

Traits W1 W2 Traits V1 V2<br />

DNA 0.9605 -2.2161 APW -0.0436 0.5411<br />

Ploidy 0.0909 0.3209 NS 0.1046 0.1724<br />

WC -0.0999 -0.0931<br />

DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid content (pg); Ploidy level; APW: absence or presence of wings; NS: number of stems<br />

per plant; and WC: wing colour.<br />

( ) of overlapping variance of the<br />

first canonical variate. The second canonical correlation<br />

W2V2, which exhibited 0.2850, represents 39.9%<br />

( ) overlapping variance of the<br />

second canonical variate set (Table 3). The coefficients<br />

of canonical variates from the original data are presented<br />

in Table 4. These coefficients of canonical equations are<br />

not unique since the DNA coefficient value is more than<br />

1.0. Therefore, the coefficients were standardized to give<br />

canonical variates with zero mean and unit variance.<br />

The standardized canonical coefficients for the X and Y<br />

trait sets are presented in Table 5. The magnitude of<br />

each canonical coefficient represents the relative<br />

contribution of each trait to its respective canonical<br />

variate. From Equations 1 and 2, the following canonical<br />

variates can be obtained from the standardized<br />

coefficients (Table 5):<br />

W1 = 0.0890 DNA + 0.0591 Ploidy<br />

V1 = -0.0159 APW + 0.0815 NS – 0.0845 WC<br />

W2 = -0.2052 DNA + 0.2157 Ploidy<br />

V2 = 0.1971 APW + 0.1344 NS – 0.0787 WC<br />

From the equations aforementioned, W1 estimates the<br />

additive effect between DNA amount and ploidy level;<br />

whereas V1 estimates the contrast between number of<br />

stems per plant on one hand and the other traits (wing<br />

colour and absence or presence of wing). This indicates<br />

that the large variation in morphological traits (wing<br />

colour and absence or presence of wing) compared to<br />

number of stems per plant was possibly due to the<br />

additive influence between the cytological traits, like DNA<br />

amount and ploidy level. However, the second canonical<br />

variate, W2 estimates a contrast between DNA amount<br />

and ploidy level; whereas V2 measures the difference<br />

between wing colour and the other traits (number of stem<br />

per plant and absence or presence of wing). This<br />

indicates that the variation in morphological traits<br />

(absence or presence of wing and number of stem per<br />

plant) compared to wing colour was possibly due to the<br />

influence of the cytological traits (DNA amount and ploidy<br />

level). Of the three morphological traits used, number of<br />

stems produced per plant and wing colour were more<br />

stable (their signs did not change in both canonical<br />

variates) compared to absence or presence of wing<br />

(Table 5). Ploidy level was also more stable compared to<br />

DNA content. This implies that a group of genotypes with<br />

similar ploidy level may not necessarily contain the same<br />

DNA content and consequently, the number of loci will


Table 5. Standardized coefficients of the respective traits of the canonical variates.<br />

Traits W1 W2 Traits V1 V2<br />

DNA 0.0890 -0.2052 APW -0.0159 0.1971<br />

Ploidy 0.0591 0.2157 NS 0.0815 0.1344<br />

WC -0.0845 -0.0787<br />

DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid content (pg); Ploidy level; APW: absence or presence of wings; NS: number of<br />

stems per plant; and WC: wing colour.<br />

vary. The proportion of the total variance extracted from a<br />

set of traits by a canonical variate of that set is equal to<br />

the quotient of the sum of square of loadings and the<br />

number of traits in the set. Thus, the first canonical<br />

variates, W1 in the X trait set; and V1 in the Y trait set,<br />

were estimated as 0.0057 [(0.0890 2 + 0.0591 2 )/2] and<br />

0.0047 [(-0.0159 2 + 0.0815 2 + (-0.0845 2 )/3] respectively.<br />

Therefore, the first canonical variate (W1) extracted<br />

0.57% in the X trait set and 0.47% in the Y trait set.<br />

The second canonical variates (W2) in the X trait set<br />

and (V2) in the Y trait set were estimated as 0.0443 [(-<br />

0.2052 2 + 0.2157 2 )/2] and 0.0210 [(0.1971 2 + 0.1344 2 + (-<br />

0.0787 2 )/3], respectively. The redundancy index in a<br />

canonical variate is expressed as the percentage of<br />

variance it extracts from its own set of traits. Thus, the<br />

first canonical variate (V1) extracted 0.09% (0.0047 ×<br />

0.4441 2 ) of the variance in the X trait set; whereas, the<br />

second variate (V2) extracted 0.17% (0.0210 × 0.2850 2 )<br />

of the variance in the X trait set. The results suggest that<br />

traits in the Y trait set (APW, NS and WC) are influenced<br />

by those in the X trait set (DNA and ploidy).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The first pair of canonical variates (W1V1) had the highest<br />

(0.4441) estimated canonical correlation compared to the<br />

second pair of canonical variates [W2V2 (0.2850)]. The<br />

correlation between the first pair of canonical variate<br />

indicates that morphological traits: absence or presence<br />

of wing, number of stems per plant and wing colour are<br />

associated with cytological traits: DNA and Ploidy level.<br />

The signs of the standardized coefficients reflect the<br />

effects of DNA and ploidy on absence or presence of<br />

wing, number of stems and wing colour. Wright et al.<br />

(2008) suggested that the total amount of DNA in the<br />

genome (genome size) roughly reflects an estimate of the<br />

number of genes within a genome. Thus, an<br />

understanding of allelic diversity within germplasm is<br />

relevant in association with observed phenotypic<br />

variation. The redundancy estimates for the first and<br />

second canonical correlation suggested that 0.09 and<br />

0.17% of the variance in the Y trait set (APW, NS and<br />

WC) was accounted by the X trait set (DNA and ploidy).<br />

Although, the percentages were small, the variation in<br />

each of the morphological traits showed a significant<br />

(p


2678 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Souter DM (2009).<br />

Genstat for Windows (12 th Edition) Introduction VSN International,<br />

Hemel Hempstead.<br />

Sharma S (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques. John Willey and<br />

Sons, Inc., Canada. pp. 391-404.<br />

Tabachnick B, Fidell LS (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. A Pearson<br />

Education Company, Needham Heights, USA. pp. 966.<br />

Wright SI, Ness RW, Foxe JP, Barette SCH (2008). Genomic<br />

consequences of out-crossing and selfing in plants. Inter. J. Plant<br />

Sci., 169: 105-118.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2679-2682, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1734<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Distribution of nuclei and microfilaments during pollen<br />

germination in Populus tomentosa Carr.<br />

Yuan Cao, Rui-Zhi Hao, Mei-Qin Liu, Xin-Min An and Yan-Ping Jing*<br />

National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, NDRC, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing<br />

Forestry University, Tsinghua East Road No. 35, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China.<br />

Accepted 28 March, 2012<br />

Pollen tubes transport nuclei to the ovules for fertilization. The distribution of microfilaments and the<br />

nuclei were investigated by fluorescent phalloidin labeling and DAPI (4', 6-diamidino-2- phenylindole)<br />

during pollen germination and pollen tube growth of Populus tomentosa Carr., a Chinese native tree<br />

species. The coexistence of trinucleate and binucleate pollen was confirmed, which had been<br />

previously considered binucleate. Three distinct typical microfilament structures were found, and Factin<br />

was present at the periphery of both the vegetative and the sperm nuclei. The investigation<br />

indicated that movement of sperm nuclei and vegetative nucleus is related to the microfilament system.<br />

Key words: Generative nucleus, vegetative nucleus, actin cytoskeleton, pollen tube growth.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Pollen germination and pollen tube growth are two of the<br />

most important physical activities in the sexual<br />

reproduction of plants, and both are complicated dynamic<br />

process. Pollen germination on a compatible stigma<br />

involves the pollen cell extending to form the pollen tube,<br />

which functions to send the sperm nuclei to the embryo<br />

sac (Higashiyama et al., 2003).<br />

Microfilaments form a substantial component of the<br />

cytoskeleton and play important roles in pollen<br />

germination and pollen tube growth (Taylor and Hepler,<br />

1997; Cai et al., 2000). The movement of the generative<br />

cell and the vegetative nucleus are mediated by myosin<br />

and transported along microfilaments (Vidali and Hepler,<br />

2001). The dynamic structure of microfilaments was<br />

reported to be closely related to the movement of the<br />

vegetative and generative nuclei and the generative and<br />

sperm cells at different stages in pollen development<br />

(Zee et al., 2003).<br />

Populus as an economically important timber tree in<br />

China is a model plant for tree research. Research on<br />

pollen germination and pollen tube growth in Populus is<br />

significant for its contributions to plant reproductive the<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: ypjing.bjfu@gmail.com. Fax: 86-<br />

10-62336248.<br />

movements of the nucleus and microfilaments in biology<br />

and to tree breeding. We know of no reports on Populus<br />

pollination. In this study, we used live fluorescent labeling<br />

and in vitro culturing of Populus pollen to investigate the<br />

movements of nuclei and microfilaments during pollen<br />

germination and pollen tube growth in Populus tomentosa<br />

Carr., Chinese white poplar, which belongs to the genus<br />

Populus, and is an important fast-growing timber species<br />

native to China.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Pollen collection and preservation<br />

Batches of branches of LM-50, a male clone of P. tomentosa Carr<br />

from Guan County, Shandong Province, were cut off in January,<br />

2009, 2010 and 2011 and grown hydroponically in a greenhouse.<br />

Pollen was collected from each batch and preserved in sterilized<br />

dry glass bottles containing silica gel at -20°C.<br />

Pollen germination and pollen tube growth in vitro<br />

Pre-hydrated pollen grains were cultured at a concentration<br />

of0.01g/mL in liquid germination fluid (0.8 mmol/L MgSO4, 1 mmol/L<br />

KNO3, 6 mmol/L Ca(NO3)2, 4 mmol/L H3BO3, 15% PEG-4000, 10%<br />

sucrose), which was determined by our earlier studies in a shaker<br />

(100 rpm) at 26°C for 6h. Culture was sampled for staining every 30<br />

min.


2680 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 1. Mature pollen grains in anthers before dehiscence (A-C); bar = 10 µm; A) Binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains<br />

in the loculus; B) Binucleate pollen; and C) Trinucleate pollen.<br />

Fluorescent observation of microfilament and nuclei<br />

Anthers before dehiscence were fixed with Carnoy fixative, then<br />

paraffin sections were stained with 1 µg/ml DAPI for 5 min after<br />

dewaxing and rehydration followed by washing twice with<br />

phosphate buffer (137 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 8 mmol/L<br />

Na2HPO4, 1.5 mmol/L KH2PO4, pH 7.2). The slide was sealed with<br />

50% glycerol and observed with a fluorescence microscope<br />

(OLYMPUS BX51, Tokyo, Japan).<br />

Referring to Li et al. (2001), we used fluorescent phalloidin to<br />

investigate actin arrangement. At room temperature, microfilaments<br />

in living pollen and pollen tubes were labeled in the dark for 15 min<br />

with 165 nmol/mL Alexa Fluor® 488 phalloidin dye (Invitrogen,<br />

California, USA) containing 1.5% DMSO and 0.01% NP-40. Nuclei<br />

were stained with 0.5 µg/mL DAPI for 5 to 10 min. After staining,<br />

one drop of culture liquid was placed on a slide sealed with 50%<br />

glycerol and examined with a 3D laser section using the LSCM<br />

system (Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope TCS SP5, LEICA,<br />

Buffalo Grove, IL, USA).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Mature pollen that was observed before dehiscence<br />

contained not only binucleate pollen which had a brighter<br />

generative nucleus and a larger paler vegetative nucleus<br />

(Figure 1A and B), but also trinucleate pollen, which had<br />

two smaller brighter sperm nuclei produced by the<br />

division of the generative nucleus and a paler vegetative<br />

nucleus (Figure 1A and C). Prior studies have suggested<br />

that the pollen of Populus is binucleate. However,<br />

trinucleate pollen has ever been found in several Populus<br />

species such as Populus yunnanensis (Hamilton and<br />

Langridge, 1976). We also found not more than 40%<br />

trinucleate pollen in the anther before dehiscence (Figure<br />

1A), in Chinese special local tree species- P. tomentosa<br />

Carr. Further investigation is necessary to determine the<br />

reasons for the coexistence of binucleate pollen and<br />

trinucleate pollen in P. tomentosa Carr.<br />

Under appropriate in vitro culture conditions, the<br />

generative cell of binucleate pollen is divided into two<br />

sperm cells within the pollen grain prior pollen<br />

germination. The dynamic assembling of microfilaments<br />

is critical for pollen germination and pollen tube tip growth<br />

(Fu et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2008). The sperm nuclei and<br />

vegetative nucleus were each surrounded with short<br />

fragments of microfilament (Figure 2A). As germination<br />

progressed, large amounts of actin assembled to form a<br />

microfilament meshwork throughout the pollen grain and<br />

the vegetative and sperm nuclei were enveloped by a<br />

dense network of microfilaments (Figure 2B). As the<br />

pollen tube emerged, the three nuclei moved towards the<br />

base of the pollen grain opposite the pollen tube<br />

orientation (Figure 2C); subsequently, they began to<br />

move out of the grain and into the growing pollen tube<br />

(Figure 2D). The pollen tube continued to extend, and<br />

ultimately all three nuclei entered the elongated pollen<br />

tube (Figure 2E1, E2 and G). At this point, the parallel<br />

bundles of microfilaments were distinctive, especially,<br />

around the nuclei. Throughout the germination process,<br />

microfilaments were always observed around the<br />

vegetative nucleus (Figures 2C and E2). There were also<br />

microfilaments around the sperm nuclei except in the<br />

early germination stage when the nuclei moved towards<br />

the base of the pollen grain, when there was no<br />

microfilament staining (dark areas) around the sperm<br />

nuclei (Figure 2C).<br />

Subapically, the microfilaments usually formed a<br />

network (Figure 2H) or a cortical fringe (Figure 2I).<br />

Apically, long actin filaments were lacking; instead there<br />

were very short fragments (Figure 2H) or a dark area with<br />

no fluorescence (Figure 2I). But some abnormalities were<br />

observed, such as only one sperm nucleus has entered<br />

the pollen tube, while the other sperm nucleus and the<br />

vegetative nucleus remain in the pollen grain (Figure 2F).<br />

In the pollen tube, the microfilaments around the sperm<br />

nucleus appear thin and end-arranged, while the<br />

microfilaments in the grain where the two nuclei will move<br />

towards disorderly (Figure 2F). However, it has been


Figure 2. F-actin and the movement of nuclei during pollen<br />

germination and pollen tube growth in P. tomentosa Car.; bar = 10<br />

µm; Arrow head: microfilament; arrow: nucleus; A) Microfilaments<br />

forming spindle- and needle-shaped granules around the nuclei<br />

(after hydration); B) Dense network of microfilaments around the<br />

nuclei (before germination); C) Nuclei positioned basally in the<br />

pollen grain, with distinct microfilaments around the vegetative<br />

nucleus (early germination); D) Microfilaments around the sperm<br />

nuclei as they moving into the growing pollen tube; E1) 3D image<br />

of end-arranged microfilaments near the nuclei in a long pollen<br />

tube; E2) Merged image from two channels at one single layer of<br />

pollen tube showing microfilaments around the nuclei at the same<br />

position shown in E1; F) Microfilaments around the sperm<br />

nucleus in the pollen tube appear thin and end-arranged, while<br />

microfilaments in the paths of the nuclei movement within the<br />

grain were disorderly; G) End-arranged microfilaments in a pollen<br />

tube containing three nuclei. SN, sperm nuclei; VN, vegetative<br />

nucleus. H-I) Structure of microfilaments in pollen tube; note the<br />

parallel bundles in the shanks of the pollen tubes; H, bracket:<br />

subapical F-actin network, arrow head: apical short fragments; I,<br />

bracket: subapical cortical fringe of microfilament fragments,<br />

arrow head: no visible apical F-actin.<br />

Cao et al. 2681


2682 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

found that microfilaments enveloped the vegetative<br />

nucleus of mature pollen, while there were no<br />

microfilaments around the generative cell (Gervais et al.,<br />

1994; Hause et al., 1992) and the movement into the<br />

pollen tube of the vegetative nucleus and sperm cells was<br />

thought to depend on the microfilament-associated<br />

myosin motive system (Heslop-Harrison and Heslop-<br />

Harrison, 1989). Our results of microfilaments around<br />

both the vegetative and sperm nuclei (Figure 2A to G)<br />

indicated that the movement of the nuclei in P. tomentosa<br />

Carr. is also dependent on the microfilament-associated<br />

myosin motive system and the existence of<br />

microfilaments in the sperm cells may differ among<br />

species. Our result also suggests that thedisruption of<br />

microfilament distribution and/or structure could prevent<br />

the nuclei from entering the pollen tube (Figure 2F).<br />

The in vitro pollen germination ratio of P. tomentosa<br />

Carr. was relatively low, and stored pollen grains do not<br />

live long. Thus, not all aspects of the movement of<br />

vegetative and sperm nuclei have been revealed.<br />

Furthermore, could the disruption of the microfilament<br />

network be a component of incompatibility in Populus?<br />

Further research, including in vivo reporter gene<br />

strategies and real-time dynamic observation should be<br />

carried out to investigate these issues.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Our investigation confirms the coexistence of trinucleate<br />

and binucleate pollen instead of only binucleate pollen in<br />

Chinese native species P. tomentosa Carr. which<br />

indicated that trinucleate pollen, is more widely in<br />

Populus than is previously acknowledged. As in other<br />

species, pollen tubes in P. tomentosa Carr. have three<br />

distinct microfilament regions. The observation of nuclei<br />

during pollen germination and pollen tube growth<br />

supports the argument that movement of sperm nuclei in<br />

the pollen tube is related to the microfilament system<br />

similar to the movement of the vegetative nucleus. We<br />

therefore, propose that a disruption in the arrangement of<br />

microfilaments in P. tomentosa Carr. pollen may<br />

adversely affect the normal transportation of nuclei from<br />

the pollen grain to the embryo sac, and may be a cause<br />

of incompatibility. More attention should be paid to this<br />

new aspect of tree breeding as microfilaments are<br />

important to the regulation of pollen tube growth and to<br />

signal transduction.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

This study was supported by the Nature Science<br />

Foundation of China (30700636, 31170631).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Cai G, Del Casino C, Cresti M (2000). Cytoskeletal basis of organelle<br />

trafficking in the angiosperm pollen tube. Ann. Bot-London, 85:69-77.<br />

Fu Y, Wu G, Yang Z (2001). Rop GTPase–dependent dynamics of tiplocalized<br />

F-actin controls tip growth in pollen tubes. J. Cell Biol.,<br />

152:1019-1032.<br />

Gervais C, Simmonds DH, Newcomb W (1994). Actin microfilament<br />

organization during pollen development of Brassica napus cv. Topas.<br />

Protoplasma, 183:67-76.<br />

Hamilton D, Langridge P (1976). Trinucleate pollen in the genus<br />

Populus. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 32:467-468.<br />

Hause G, Hause B, Van Lammeren A (1992). Microtubular and actin<br />

filament configurations during microspore and pollen development in<br />

Brassica napus cv. Topas. Can. J. Bot., 70: 1369-1376.<br />

Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1989). Myosin associated with<br />

the surfaces of organelles, vegetative nucleus and generative cells in<br />

angiosperm pollen grains and tubes. J. Cell. Sci., 94: 319-325.<br />

Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T (2003). Pollen-tube guidance:<br />

beacons from the female gametophyte. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 6: 36-<br />

41.<br />

Lee YJ, Szumlanski A, Nielsen E, Yang Z (2008). Rho-GTPase–<br />

dependent filamentous actin dynamics coordinate vesicle targeting<br />

and exocytosis during tip growth. J. Cell Biol., 181: 1155-1168.<br />

Li Y, Zee SY, Liu YM, Huang BQ, Yen LF (2001). Circular F-actin<br />

bundles and a G-actin gradient in pollen and pollen tubes of Lilium<br />

davidii. Planta, 213: 722-730.<br />

Taylor LP, Hepler PK (1997). Pollen germination and tube growth.<br />

Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 48: 461-491.<br />

Vidali L, Hepler PK (2001). Actin and pollen tube growth. Protoplasma,<br />

215: 64-76.<br />

Zee S, Ye X, Wang L, Yau CP, Yip WK (2003). F-actin visualization in<br />

generative and sperm cells of living pollen of rice using a GFPmouse<br />

talin fusion protein. Acta Bot. Sin., 45(008): 949-958.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2683-2688, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1648<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Development of an automatic cutting system for<br />

harvesting oil palm fresh fruit bunch (FFB)<br />

Hamed Shokripour 1 *, Wan Ishak Wan Ismail 1 , Ramin Shokripour 2 and Zahra Moezkarimi 3<br />

1 Department of Biological and Agriculture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400<br />

Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.<br />

2 Software Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya,<br />

50603 Lembah Pantai Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.<br />

3 Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Ave,<br />

Tehran, Iran.<br />

Accepted 17 April, 2012<br />

The purpose of this project was to design, fabricate and test a harvesting mechanism for oil palm fresh<br />

fruit bunches (FFB). A carrier machine was designed and fabricated which can move around the tree<br />

trunk smoothly while carrying the cutting system. A mechanize motor system also was designed and<br />

assembled on the carrier machine for moving the cutting machine forward and backward along the tree<br />

trunk radius. For a successful and smooth cutting process, two direct current (DC) motors were used<br />

for carrier machine. Cutting machine consists of a mechanism for cutting and a cutting blade. A<br />

reciprocating mechanism was used in this project because of the added advantages of this method as<br />

compared to others. Design of the blade tooth for doing a fast and clean cut was an important<br />

parameter in this project. An HM-TR Transparent Wireless Data Link Module and an ATmega8<br />

microcontroller were used to control the cutting system. This system was tested successfully in both<br />

laboratory and field condition.<br />

Key words: Cutter blade, fruit harvesting, oil palm, reciprocating cutting, remote controller.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The goal of agricultural robotics does not only apply to<br />

robotics technologies in the field of agriculture, it also<br />

applies to using agricultural challenges to develop new<br />

techniques and systems (Ito, 1990). An agricultural robot<br />

must deal with an unstructured, unknown, uncertain and<br />

varying environment. Fruits are randomly located on<br />

trees and are difficult to detect and reach (Jimenez et al.<br />

1999). In recent years, harvester robots have been<br />

among the noteworthy topics studied by researchers.<br />

Until now, different robots have been designed for<br />

harvesting fruits, such as apples and oranges (Baeten et<br />

al., 2008; Sanders, 2005).<br />

The production of palm oil and palm kernel oil in 2005<br />

reached 36 million tons, and palm derived oil has become<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: hamedshokripour@gmail.com.<br />

Tel: 0060-173724849.<br />

the most abundant and consistently supplied oil among<br />

vegetable oils of the world (Kanoh et al., 2008). The oil<br />

palm is a tree without branches but with many wide<br />

leaves at its top. The fruits are compactly packed in<br />

bunches which are hidden in leaf axils in crowns that may<br />

be over 12 m above the ground. In traditional harvesting<br />

methods, the short oil palm trees within arm-reach are<br />

harvested using the chisel to cut the fruit bunches and<br />

fronds. The tall trees above 9 m in height are harvested<br />

using a curved knife with the sharp edge which is<br />

attached to the end of a bamboo pole. The worker stands<br />

on the ground while the pole and knife are raised to the<br />

tree crown in order to harvest bunches (Adetan et al.,<br />

2007).<br />

Timeliness of harvesting is very crucial to the quality<br />

and quantity of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFB). The<br />

design and fabrication of the harvester robot for oil palm<br />

bunches are subjects that have stimulated the interest of<br />

many researchers to work on better method (Muhamad,


2684 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 1. Oil palm climbing robot.<br />

2008). The proposed cutting system consists of two main<br />

parts: (1) a system for cutting the leaves, bunches and<br />

fronds and (2) a system for carrying the cutter blade near<br />

to the fruit bunches.<br />

This project was carried out to design and fabricate a<br />

light and powerful cutting system that can be carried by a<br />

four wheeled tree climbing robot (Shokripour et al., 2010).<br />

The climbing robot used in this project can carry the<br />

weight of a cutting system with a maximum of 7 kg while<br />

keeping its balance. Previous oil palm harvesting<br />

machines use a hydraulic power source; hence, these<br />

machines are powerful, big and heavy. An electric power<br />

source and electrical components were used to make it a<br />

light and powerful cutting system. After considering and<br />

testing different mechanisms of cutting the oil palm<br />

leaves and bunches, the reciprocating motion of a<br />

rectangular blade was found to be the best option. An<br />

alternative current (AC) motor was used as the driver of<br />

cutting machine. An inverter device was used to convert<br />

the direct current (DC) from the battery to an appropriate<br />

AC current for the motor of the cutting machine.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The cutting system comprises of three main parts: cutting machine,<br />

carrier machine and the electronic control system. The function of<br />

the cutting machine is to cut the fronds and the stem of the fruit<br />

bunches. The cutting process is carried out by fast and continual<br />

reciprocating motions of a rectangular saw blade. The cutting<br />

machine was installed on the carrier machine. Carrier machine can<br />

generate a circular motion for cutting machine to go around the tree<br />

trunk and also a forward and backward motion on the tree trunk<br />

circumference. This system makes the cutting machine able to cut<br />

the leaves and bunches on any point of the tree trunk. The control<br />

system of the robot analyses the received commands from the<br />

operator’s remote controller to send an appropriate command to<br />

each electric motors.<br />

The whole components of the cutting system are assembled on a<br />

four wheels tree climbing robot. Designing the cutting system with<br />

minimum weight was one of the most important parameter in this<br />

project, because the climbing robot can carry a load with a<br />

maximum weight of 7 kg. The climbing robot carries the cutting<br />

system to and near the leaves and fruit bunches. Figure 1 shows<br />

the climbing robot. The mechanism and operations of the climbing<br />

robot can be obtained from (Shokripour et al., 2010).<br />

Cutting machine<br />

Two essential parameters for designing a cutting machine for any<br />

material are the cutting mechanism and the cutter blade design.<br />

Common types of cutting machines include reciprocating saws,<br />

horizontal endless band saws, universal tilt frame band saws,<br />

abrasive saws, and cold saws (Ko and Kim, 1999).<br />

Rotary saw cutting is a cutting method which is versatile and<br />

effective for a variety of industrial applications. The advantages of<br />

using the rotary saw method are: faster cutting times, closer<br />

tolerances, better finishes, less kerf, easier tool changes, better tool<br />

life, and an overall wider range of applicability (Varvatsoulakis,<br />

2009).<br />

The reciprocating saw mimics the back and forth motion of a<br />

common hacksaw. The gearing system inside the reciprocating saw<br />

will cause the saw blade to move back and forth across the material


Figure 2. Reciprocating mechanism.<br />

Figure 3. The alternate set of style and its angles.<br />

Figure 4. Top view of the carrier machine.<br />

that needs to be cut. This saw is usually used to cut wood, plaster,<br />

plastic or some other soft material (Brumbach and Clade, 2003).<br />

The wire saw can successfully cut the leaves; however, finding an<br />

appropriate wire, assembling the wire, repairing or changing the cut<br />

wire are some problems that operators encounter in the field.<br />

Round saw blade for cutting the fruit bunches was tested, and it<br />

failed. The diameter of the round saw blade for cutting the leaves<br />

Shokripour et al. 2685<br />

needs to be more than 26 cm, which is twice the diameter of the<br />

leaves. It causes strong vibrations during the cutting process.<br />

Furthermore, after cutting the oil palm leaves, the leaf fibers stuck<br />

around the blade shaft and cause the motor to stop. Cleaning these<br />

fibers is a difficult and time consuming process for operators.<br />

After testing and comparing different cutting methods, the<br />

reciprocating method was used in this project for cutting the leaves<br />

and bunches. Reciprocating motion is produced in various ways.<br />

The helical pinion gear that powers a flat drive gear at right angles<br />

was used to transfer the rotary motion of the motor in to a<br />

reciprocating linear motion. The drive gear has an offset roller<br />

bearing that acts as a crank. In conjunction with a channel mounted<br />

on the reciprocating shaft, also known as a slider, the circular<br />

motion is converted to reciprocating motion. Figure 2 shows the<br />

components of the reciprocating machine used in this project.<br />

A 350 W AC motor was used to drive this system. DC motors that<br />

can generate the same speed and power are found to be big and<br />

heavy but were not recommended. Since the power source was<br />

used for climber robot and other components are a direct current<br />

battery, we used an inverter device to convert the 12 V DC to 220 V<br />

and 500 W AC for this motor. The speed of the motor, and<br />

accordingly, the number of strokes can be adjusted within the range<br />

of 200 to 3000 min -1 for the saw blade.<br />

The important parameters to be considered when choosing a<br />

blade for cutting are the type of metal, width, blade set, thickness,<br />

tooth form and length of the blade. Most saws are designed to<br />

create a kerf that is wider than the saw blade. This difference is<br />

called the side clearance which is the most important parameter for<br />

doing a curve cut (Duginske, 1989).<br />

The teeth of the blade used in this project were bent alternately in<br />

opposite directions to create a kerf wider than the body. The<br />

amount of bending is usually proportionate to the thickness of the<br />

blade body and is usually 25% of the blade thickness. The angle at<br />

which the points of the saw tooth make contact with the material is<br />

an important factor of the effective cutting performance of a saw<br />

blade. Figure 3 shows the design of the alternate tooth style and<br />

teeth angles of the blade used in this project for cutting the oil palm<br />

leaves.<br />

The radial lengths of the circles that can be cut by a blade<br />

depend on the ratio of the width of the blade to the width of the saw<br />

kerf. Since the diameter of the tree trunk is not constant, the blade<br />

was designed based on the minimum size of the oil palm tree trunk<br />

which is 32 cm. The appropriate size of the blade width is<br />

calculated using:<br />

W<br />

2<br />

2<br />

�<br />

� � � �2 2<br />

R � K � R � T<br />

Where W is the blade width, R is the radius of the tree trunk, K is<br />

the size of the kerf width and T is the thickness of the blade.<br />

Carrier machine<br />

One of the most important objectives of this project was to design a<br />

mechanism that can move around the tree to place the blade of the<br />

cutting machine at any point around the tree and at any distance<br />

from the surface of the tree trunk. A special rail was designed for<br />

the carrier robot to guide the cutting machine on a fixed circular<br />

path around the tree. The carrier machine comprises of one DC<br />

motor, four ball transfers, three ball bearings and one sprocket.<br />

Figure 4 shows the top view of the transporter robot.<br />

The ball transfers were used as the wheels of the machine. Using<br />

the ball transfers as the wheel enable the carrier machine to<br />

smoothly navigate itself around the tree trunk, because it generates<br />

only a small amount of friction and have three degree of freedoms.


2686 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 5. Carrier machine.<br />

Figure 6. DC motor, plate, sprocket and chain.<br />

The power required to drive the robot is generated by a DC micro<br />

gear motor. A gearbox was installed on this motor to reduce its<br />

speed from 2500 to 5 rpm. The slow motion of the cutting system<br />

causes smooth and accurate cutting. Furthermore, decreasing the<br />

motor speed causes an increase in the power and torque of the<br />

motor which lead to more force to push the cutting blade into the<br />

branch. The power of the motor is transferred to a 4 cm diameter<br />

sprocket. The speed of the carrier machine moving around the tree<br />

is calculated as:<br />

V = 5 rpm � (4 � 3.14) = 51.52 cm. min -1<br />

The motor rotation direction is controlled by the operator via a<br />

remote controller.<br />

To do an accurate cutting, a gear system was added on carrier<br />

machine to move the cutting machine forward and backward along<br />

the tree trunk circumference. It comprised of a DC motor with a<br />

sprocket, a set of two ball bearing drawer slides and two limit<br />

switches. Figures 5 and 6 show the schematic and fabricated<br />

system after they have been installed on the carrier machine.<br />

The DC motor was installed in such position so that the teeth of<br />

its sprocket were placed inside the chain. The rotation of the DC<br />

motor causes the sheet metal to move forward and backward. One<br />

limit switch was installed at the head of the cutting machine. When<br />

the cutting machine moves forward, the limit switch touches the tree<br />

surface and stops the motor. Controlling of the DC motors is done<br />

by the operator using the remote controller.<br />

REMOTE CONTROLLER<br />

A remote controller system comprises of hardware and software<br />

designed and fabricated for operator to control the cutting system.<br />

The remote controller and the cutting system each have one HM-<br />

RF transmitter receiver device and an ATmega32 microcontroller as<br />

the main hardware components. A specific program was written for<br />

each microcontroller to receive the data, analyze them and finally<br />

generate and send the appropriate commands to other<br />

components, such as DC motors and HM-RF devices.<br />

A HM-TR Transparent Wireless Data Link Module consists of<br />

two parts, both of which can send and receive data wirelessly. The<br />

first part is used by the remote controller to send the operator’s<br />

commands and the second part is installed on the cutting system to<br />

receive the commands from the remote controller. The data


Table 1. Program for controlling<br />

the cutting system functions.<br />

R1 = Udr<br />

If Flag1 = 0 Then<br />

If R1 = 10 Then<br />

Cs1 = 10<br />

Flag1 = 1<br />

Count1 = 1<br />

End If<br />

Else<br />

Sdata1(count1) = R1<br />

If Count1 = 2 Then<br />

If Cs2 = Sdata1(2) Then<br />

Setpoint1 = Sdata1(1)<br />

Count1 = 0<br />

Flag1 = 0<br />

End If<br />

End If<br />

Incr Count1<br />

Cs2 = Cs1 + R1<br />

End<br />

Figure 7. Carrier system and cutting machine.<br />

transferred between these parts uses a radio frequency that ranges<br />

between 310.24 and 929.27 MHz. This paper focuses more on the<br />

processes needed to transfer the data from the HM-TR Module to<br />

the microcontroller, and the analysis of them.<br />

The HM-TR Transparent Wireless Data Link Module uses RS232<br />

logic level for transferring data to the microcontroller. The RS232<br />

physical specification produces a logic 1 at receiver input as -3 to -<br />

25 V and logic 0 as +3 to +25 V. Since the ATmega64<br />

microcontroller can receive and analyze the data on the transistortransistor<br />

logic (TTL) logic level, a MAX232 integrated circuit (IC) is<br />

used for converting the data of the HM-TR Module to TTL logic<br />

level. It can generate the necessary RS-232 voltage levels of<br />

approximately -10 and +10 V internally from a single +5 V power<br />

supply. It can reduce RS-232 inputs which may be as high as ±25 V<br />

to standard TTL levels 5 V.<br />

Software<br />

Shokripour et al. 2687<br />

When the operator pushes a button of the remote controller, the<br />

remote controller sends three numerical codes to the receiver of the<br />

robot. The first number informs the microcontroller that a new<br />

command is being sent by remote controller and it readies the<br />

microcontroller to receive the next two numbers. The second<br />

number is the code of the command that is allocated to a button of<br />

the remote controller. By analyzing this number, the microcontroller<br />

understands what the operator wants the robot to do. The third<br />

number is a summation of the first and the second numbers and is<br />

called the check sum number. The microcontroller also adds up the<br />

first and the second received numbers and compares the result with<br />

the check sum. If these numbers are the same, the microcontroller<br />

understands that it has received the data from the remote controller<br />

completely and correctly. Table 1 shows the main part of the remote<br />

control program that was written for controlling the functions of<br />

cutting system.<br />

In the next program, the microcontroller sends the appropriate<br />

command to each DC motor based on the value of the second<br />

number. To change the motors rotation directions, a miniature<br />

intermediate power relay was used for each motor. The operator<br />

can start and stop the DC motors for moving the cutting system<br />

around the tree trunk and also move it forward and backward.<br />

Furthermore, turning the AC motor of the cutting machine on and<br />

off is controlled by the remote controller.<br />

Since the power supply of this robot is a 12 V DC, an inverter<br />

device is used to convert the 12 V DC to 220 V and 500 W AC. To<br />

decrease the weight of the system, the inverter device is placed on<br />

the ground.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Different parts of this cutting system were tested in<br />

laboratory condition. The cutting machine was tested by<br />

cutting the oil palm leaves. The blade cut the leaves<br />

successfully and created a suitable kerf but it was<br />

suggested to design and fabricate a new type of blade<br />

with round shaft like round fine with larger and sharper<br />

teeth for developing this system. Figure 7 shows this<br />

machine after assembling the cutting system on carrier<br />

machine.<br />

The center of the oil palm leaves is made of very hard<br />

wood. During the cutting process this part caused intense<br />

vibrations to be generated in the carrier robot. This<br />

problem was solved by adjusting the carrier robot to<br />

make it more stable during the cutting process. The<br />

speed of moving the blade through the leaves was slow<br />

enough to carry out an accurate and successful cutting.<br />

Fabricating and adjusting the carrier machine was a<br />

difficult part of this project because of having large<br />

number of components. For developing this system can<br />

redesign some parts of the carrier system to make it<br />

more stable against the vibrations.<br />

The maximum size of the oil palm leaves and bunches<br />

were 14 cm in this tests and the speed of the cutting<br />

system is 51.52 cm/min. The time required for cutting a<br />

leaves is 14 × 60/51.52 = 16.3 s. Figure 8 shows the<br />

cutting system after assembling on the climbing robot.<br />

The weight of the cutting system was 6.3 kg, so the<br />

climbing robot can carry it successfully to and near the


2688 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 8. Cutting system after assembling on climbing robot.<br />

leaves and bunches. The total weight of climbing robot<br />

and cutting system is 18.5 kg, so the operator can move<br />

it easily from tree to tree in the farm. The power supply of<br />

the climbing and cutting system is 12 V DC which can be<br />

generated by automobile battery. Different functions of<br />

the remote control of the system were tested<br />

successfully. Since it was designed to be user friendly,<br />

the operator can control the robot easily after short<br />

training.<br />

REFERENCESS<br />

Adetan DA, Adekoya LO, Oladejo KA (2007). An Improved Pole-and-<br />

Knife Method of Har vesting Oil Palms. Agricultural Engineering<br />

International: The CIGR E J. p. 60.<br />

Baeten J, Donne K, Boedrij S, Beckers W , Claesen E (2008).<br />

Autonomous Fruit Picking Machine: A Robotic Apple Harvester. Field<br />

Serv. Rob., 531-539.<br />

Brumbach ME, Clade JA (2003). Industrial Maintenance, Published by<br />

Delmar Learning. ISBN0-7668-2695-3<br />

Duginske M (1989),band saw handbook published by sterling publishing<br />

Co, New York, ISBN 0-8069-6398-0.<br />

Ito N (1990). Agricultural robots in Japan. 'Towards a New Frontier of<br />

Applications', Proceedings. IROS '90. IEEE International Workshop<br />

on ssue Date: 3-6 Jul 1990.<br />

Jimenez AR, Ceres R, Pons JL (1999). A machine vision system using<br />

a laser radar applied to robotic fruit harvesting. (CVBVS '99)<br />

Proceedings. Workshop on Computer Vision Beyond the Visible<br />

Spectrum: Methods and Applications. IEEE Computer Society<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

Kanoh T, Iwabuchi H, Hoshida Y, Yamada J, Hikosaka T, Yamazaki<br />

A, Hatta Y, Koide H (2008). Analyses of electro-chemical<br />

characteristics of Palm Fatty Acid Esters as insulating oil. Dielectric<br />

Liquids, 2008. ICDL 2008. IEEE International Conference on.<br />

Ko TJ, Kim HS (1999). Mechanistic cutting force model in band sawing.<br />

Inter. J. Mach. Tools Manufacture, 39(8): 1185-1197.<br />

Muhamad JMRW (2008). "Design and fabrication the Prototype of a<br />

Motorized Cutter for Harvesting Palm fruit" University Malaysia<br />

Pahang, Thesis.<br />

Sanders KF (2005). Selective Picking Head for Citrus Harvester.<br />

Biosyst. Eng., 90(3): 279-287.<br />

Shokripour H, Ismail WIW, Moes KZ (2010)."Development of an<br />

automatic self balancing control system for a tree climbing robot"<br />

Afri. J. Agric. Res., pp. 5-21.<br />

Varvatsoulakis MN (2008). Design and implementation issues of a<br />

control system for rotary saw cutting. Control Eng. Pract., 17: 198–<br />

202.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2689-2700, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1234<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Total factor productivity growth and convergence in<br />

Northern Thai agriculture<br />

Sanzidur Rahman 1 *, Aree Wiboonpongse 2 , Songsak Sriboonchitta 3 and Kritsada Kanmanee 4<br />

1 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth,<br />

Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.<br />

2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200.<br />

3 Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.<br />

4 Institute of Self-sufficiency in Research and Promotion, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.<br />

Accepted 28 March, 2012<br />

The paper estimate s Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth in six agro-economic zones of Northern<br />

Thailand covering a 23 year period (1977 to 1999) and te sts convergence among st regions using a<br />

stochastic production frontier approach. Results revealed that all the inputs excluding fertilizer<br />

significantly contribute to agricultural productivity. Increa sing returns to scale prevail in these regions.<br />

Land, labor, irrigation and loan capital have substitution relationships but all are within the inelastic<br />

range. The mean technical efficiency level is low (0.88). The overall TFP declined slightly due to<br />

technical regress and mode st improvement in technical efficiency change over time. However,<br />

convergence in productivity ha s been reached in all regions towards the end. The government’s<br />

initiative to support investment through Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperative loan had a<br />

significant influence on technical efficiency improvements. Policy i mplications include provision of<br />

capital through loan, investments in irrigation, and proper functioning of land and labor markets to<br />

improve agricultural productivity.<br />

Key words: Thailand, stochastic production frontiers, total factor productivity growth, convergence, technical<br />

efficiency change, technical change, agro-economic zone.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Agricultural productivity and efficiency improvements<br />

have been the priority concern of the government in<br />

developing countries due to severe pressure imposed by<br />

declining agricultural prices as well as, prevailing highly<br />

competitive trade environment. Therefore, performance<br />

evaluation of the agricultural sector at the national,<br />

regional or provincial level is important for policy<br />

planning. Given the unprecedented food crisis in recent<br />

years, the importance of measuring performance of the<br />

agricultural sector became a topmost priority of many<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: srahman@plymouth.ac.uk. Tel:<br />

+44-1752-585911. Fax: +44-1752-585998.<br />

JEL classification: O33, Q18 and C21.<br />

developing economies in order to ensure food security of<br />

its growing population base.<br />

Traditionally, the rice industry has played an important<br />

role in the Thai economy by supplying main staple food,<br />

employing a large portion of the labor force, and<br />

contributing towards government revenue and foreign<br />

exchange earnings (Choeun et al., 2006). Thailand has<br />

experienced high rate of growth in agricultural sector over<br />

the past four decades mainly through expansion of areas<br />

(for example, by clearing forests) which however, cannot<br />

be continued from the 1990’s onward (Krasachat, 2001).<br />

As a result, government promoted the use of modern<br />

inputs such as fertilizers and irrigation facilities to boost<br />

agricultural productivity. Nevertheless, the policy makers<br />

and economists have raised questions on the impact of<br />

modern input usage as well as, the availability of new<br />

lands on productivity growth of the Thai agricultural


2690 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

sector (Krasachat, 2001).<br />

Studies on Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth of<br />

Thai agriculture are highly limited. So far, only a few<br />

studies are available, perhaps largely due to data<br />

limitations but are characterized with similar overall<br />

conclusions. Luh et al. (2008) analyzed TFP growth using<br />

a DEA approach jointly for eight East Asian economies<br />

including Thailand using national level aggregate data for<br />

the period of 1961 to 2001. They concluded that the<br />

agricultural productivity in Thailand has deteriorated<br />

largely due to technical regress which in turn had a<br />

dominating effect on the improvement in technical<br />

efficiency. Although, this study provides a detailed<br />

examination of TFP growth in Thailand, the limitation in<br />

the study of Luh et al. (2008) is that the performance of<br />

Thailand is measured in relation to a multi-country<br />

production frontier. Therefore, intra-provincial or regional<br />

performance cannot be identified due to aggregate nature<br />

of the data. Suphannachart and Warr (2010) used<br />

national aggregate data for the period of 1970 to 2006<br />

and measured agricultural TFP using the growth<br />

accounting method and concluded that TFP in crop<br />

sector grew at an annual rate of 0.68%. The obvious<br />

problem with this study is the limited number of<br />

observations (that is, only 36 observations) and the<br />

inability to provide information on TFP growth<br />

components as well as, results at a lower level of<br />

aggregation, that is, at the provincial or regional level.<br />

Krasachat (2001) estimated productivity growth for four<br />

agricultural regions of Thailand over a 22 year period of<br />

(1972 to 1994) using a cost function framework which<br />

implies perfect efficiency of production units, and<br />

therefore, inherently biased. This is because it is a<br />

common knowledge that developing country agriculture<br />

operates with considerable low level of technical<br />

efficiency ranging from 72.4 to 84.5% (Bravo-Ureta et al.,<br />

2007). Krasachat (2001) concluded that the TFP index<br />

declined at an annual rate of -0.4% partly explained by<br />

low level of technical progress, which in turn is biased<br />

towards saving labor, fertilizer and capital. Finally,<br />

Krasachat (2000) applied a DEA approach to measure<br />

technical efficiency change in Thai agriculture using the<br />

same dataset and concluded that technical efficiency has<br />

been very low in general, and there has been a decline in<br />

all types of efficiency (that is, overall technical efficiency,<br />

scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency) over time.<br />

In this study, we select a panel -data of six Agroeconomic<br />

Zones (AEZs) of Northern Thailand (covering<br />

17 provinces) for a 23 year period (1977 to 1999) to: (a)<br />

measure agricultural TFP growth and its components:<br />

technical change and technical efficiency change; and (b)<br />

test for the existence of convergence in agricultural<br />

productivity amongst regions. We applied the stochastic<br />

production frontier approach in order to circumvent some<br />

of the inherent problems of DEA methodology used by<br />

Krashachat (2000) and Luh et al. (2008) as well as, to<br />

examine whether similar results hold for the Northern part<br />

of Thailand, which is essentially the most productive<br />

region of the country. The parameters of the stochastic<br />

frontier provide estimates of the changes in technical<br />

efficiency and technical progress as well as, TFP allowing<br />

policy implications to be inferred (Coelli et al., 2003).<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

Stochastic production frontier<br />

Since one of the objectives of this study is to estimate technical<br />

efficiency of these AEZs in Northern Thailand, w e applied the<br />

stochastic production frontier method as proposed by Aigner et al.<br />

(1977). The stochastic frontier production f unction for panel data<br />

can be w ritten as:<br />

Yit = exp(xit�+ Vit – Uit) (1)<br />

Where Yit is production in year t (t = 1, 2, …, 31) for region i (i = 1,<br />

2, ….., 16);<br />

� is the vector of parameters to be estimated;<br />

Vits are the error component and are assumed to follow a normal<br />

distribution N (0, �2v);<br />

Uits are non-negative random variables, associated w ith technical<br />

inefficiency in production, w hich are assumed to arise from a<br />

normal distribution w ith mean, � and variance, �2u, w hich is<br />

truncated at zero.<br />

The model used here incorporates a simple exponential<br />

specification of the time-varying inefficiencies, follow ing Battese<br />

and Coelli (1995). The technical efficiency of production for the ith<br />

region at the tth year can be predicted using Equation 2 (Coelli et<br />

al., 1998):<br />

TEit = E[exp(- Uit)|(Vit- Uit)] (2)<br />

Measuring productivity change<br />

Productivity change occurs w hen the rate of change in output<br />

differs from the rate of change in the use of an index of inputs<br />

(Kumbhakar and Lovell, 2000). TFP can be measured by<br />

constructing the Malmquist productivity index, a measure of TFP of<br />

a unit based on the ratio of total output quantity to an index of all<br />

input quantities. Unlike partial productivity measures (simple<br />

output/input ratios), TFP prov ides an overall measure of productivity<br />

(Helvoigt and Adams, 2009). Given the measure of TEit in Equation<br />

2, technical efficiency change (ECit) is then calculated as:<br />

ECit = TEit/TEis (3)<br />

An index of technological change (TCit) betw een tw o adjacent<br />

period s and t for the ith region can be directly calculated fro m the<br />

estimated parameters of the stochastic production frontier. The<br />

partial derivatives of the production function are evaluated w ith<br />

respect to time at xit and xis. We then converted these into indices<br />

and calculated their geometric mean. Follow ing Coe lli et al. (1998,<br />

2003), the calculation of the technical change index is given as:


TC<br />

it<br />

��<br />

�f<br />

( xis,<br />

s,<br />

�)<br />

� � �f<br />

( xit,<br />

t,<br />

�)<br />

��<br />

� ��<br />

1�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

1�<br />

��<br />

��<br />

�s<br />

� � �t<br />

��<br />

The indices of technical efficiency change and technological<br />

change obtained by using Equations 3 and 4 respectively can be<br />

multiplied to obtain a TFP index (Coelli et al., 2003) such as:<br />

TFPit = ECit * TCit (5)<br />

This is equivalent to the decomposition of the Malmquist index<br />

suggested by Fare et al. (1985).<br />

Data issues and variables<br />

A major draw back to conducting research on a long-term<br />

productiv ity performance of the agricultural sector is the lack of<br />

time-series panel data for most of the developing economies, and<br />

Thailand is no exception. Most often, data are available at a highly<br />

aggregated form w hich is of no use and as such unless a multicountry<br />

analysis is attempted (Luh et al., 2008), many relevant<br />

variables required for such assessment of performance<br />

disaggregated at the regional or provincial level over time are not<br />

available. Consequently, estimation of econometric models w ithout<br />

relevant variables tends to be biased.<br />

The Office of Agricultural Ec onomics (OA E) of Thailand is<br />

responsible for providing agricultural statistics to facilitate planning.<br />

In general, output data is available at A EZ levels for some period<br />

and w as discontinued in later years (for example, 2000 onw ard).<br />

Moreover, data on key production inputs such as labor and<br />

fertilizers, disaggregated at A EZ levels are even harder to come by.<br />

Rahmaan et al. 2691<br />

0.<br />

5<br />

(4)<br />

( 4)<br />

Farmers are hypothesized to incorporate natural environments in<br />

their response to economic factors (especially, price changes)<br />

which influence their decision on the use of modern inputs and<br />

adoption of technologies. Consequently, productiv ity and efficiency<br />

differ amongst regions. Hence, it is of utmost importance that<br />

performance evaluation of the agricultural sector of any economy<br />

needs to be examined at a disaggregated level so that policies can<br />

be directed to areas w here it is most needed (Table 1).<br />

Given these limitations, annual data of six AEZ w ere finally<br />

collated from the available OA E statistical yearbooks (various<br />

issues) for the period of 1977 to 1999. The series cannot be<br />

updated further due to a lack of disaggregated information on<br />

inputs. The 17 provinces included in these six A EZs of Northern<br />

Thailand are:<br />

Zone 8 = Nakhon Saw an, Phetchabun<br />

Zone 9 = Tak, Kamphang Phet, Sukothai<br />

Zone 10 = Phrae, Nan, Uttaradit<br />

Zone 11 = Phitsanulok, Phichit<br />

Zone 12 = Chiang Rai, Lampang, Phayao<br />

Zone 13 = Chiang Mai, Lamphun, Mae Hong Son.<br />

The empirical model<br />

To measure technical efficiency, TFP grow th and its components<br />

from the stochastic production frontier, w e have used the follow ing<br />

fully flexible translog function:<br />

5<br />

5 5<br />

5<br />

1<br />

1 2<br />

ln Yit � � � ��<br />

k ln X kit � �tt<br />

� �� � kj (ln X kit )(ln X jit ) � �ttt<br />

� ��<br />

kt ln X kit * t � uit<br />

� v<br />

2<br />

2<br />

0 it<br />

k�1<br />

k�1 j�1<br />

k�1<br />

(6)<br />

Where;<br />

t represents the year of the observation (1977=1);<br />

yit is the agricultural gross domestic product at constant prices<br />

(million baht) in the ith region in year t;<br />

xit is the land area (rai) of the ith region in year t;<br />

x2it is the total labor used (persons) in the ith region in year t;<br />

x3it is the amount of fertilizers used (ton) in the ith region in year t;<br />

x4it is the share of irrigated area (percentage) in the ith region in<br />

year t;<br />

x5it is the amount of loan capital disbursed (million baht) in the ith<br />

region in year t;<br />

vit and uit are respectively, the sy mmetric and one-sided random<br />

error terms denned earlier.<br />

The inefficiency effects model is specified as:<br />

uit = δ0 + δ1time + δ2rainfall + δ3BAAC + ςit (7)<br />

Where;<br />

Rainfall = the amount of average rainfall per year (mm)<br />

BAAC = the share of BAAC in total loan capital<br />

ςit = the sy mmetric error.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The parameter estimates of the stochastic production<br />

frontier model (Equation 6) estimated jointly with the<br />

inefficiency effects model (Equation 7) using the<br />

Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) procedure is<br />

presented in Table 3. Prior to discussing the results of the<br />

production frontier, we report the series of hypothesis<br />

tests conducted to select the functional form and to<br />

decide whether the frontier model is an appropriate<br />

choice rather than a standard mean-response or average<br />

production function as used by Krasachat (2001). The<br />

results are reported in Table 2. Sauer et al. (2006) raised<br />

the importance of checking theoretical consistency,<br />

flexibility and choice of the appropriate functional form<br />

when estimating stochastic production frontiers.<br />

However, given the purpose of our research, we<br />

concentrate on the choice of an appropriate functional<br />

form that is also flexible. The first test was conducted to<br />

( 6)


2692 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 2. Hypothesis tests.<br />

Table 1. Summary statistics of the variables.<br />

Variable Measurement Mean Std. deviation<br />

Deflated agricultural GDP Million baht 7,783,022.00 1,632, 899.00<br />

Land area Rai 3,589,754.00 1,377,851.00<br />

Labor Thousand persons 63,315.60 144,863.40<br />

Loan capital (commercial + BAAC) Million baht 3,855.26 3,324.45<br />

Fertilizer Tons 3,283.76 1,814.66<br />

Irrigation Percent of land area 33.00 22.96<br />

BAAC share Percent of loan 47.61 14.50<br />

Time years 12 6.66<br />

Number of regions 6<br />

Number of years 23<br />

Number of observations 138<br />

Tests Parameter restrictions<br />

LR test<br />

statistic<br />

Degree of<br />

freedom<br />

χ 2 Critical value 5% Outcome<br />

Functional form test H 0: all βjk = 0 110. 7 15 24.99 Reject H 0: CD is inadequate<br />

Frontier test<br />

H 0: M3T = 0 (that is, no<br />

inefficiency component)<br />

z statistic =<br />

40.12<br />

p value of z = 0.000 Reject H 0: Frontier not OLS<br />

No technical change H 0: βt = βtt = βkt = 0 719. 90 7 14.07 Reject H 0<br />

No inefficiency effects H 0: δ0 = δ1 = δ2 = 0 23.45 3 7.82 Reject H 0<br />

Constant returns to scale (CRTS) H 0: Σβk = 1 17.67 1 3.84 Increasing RTS<br />

Regularity conditions check<br />

Monotonicity (dy/dxi>0) for ever y<br />

input)<br />

Diminishing marginal productivity<br />

(d 2 y/dx 2 i


Table 3. Parameter estimates of the stochastic production frontier and<br />

inefficiency effects model.<br />

Production frontier function Coefficient t-ratio<br />

Constant 15.7543 414.33***<br />

ln land 0.3427 5.41***<br />

ln labor 0.8719 16.84***<br />

ln irrigation 0.0844 2.11**<br />

ln fertilizer 0.0072 0.14<br />

ln loan capital 0.1681 4.51***<br />

0.5 * (ln land) 2 -1.5702 -2.21**<br />

0.5 * (ln labor) 2 1.1642 5.27***<br />

0.5 * (ln fertilizer) 2 0.1573 0.95<br />

0.5 * (ln irrigation) 2 -0.5959 -3.01***<br />

0.5 * (ln loan capital) 2 -0.1446 -1.06<br />

ln land * ln labor 0.4354 1.38<br />

ln land * ln fertilizer 0.8809 4.69***<br />

ln land * ln irrigation -1.8395 -3.73***<br />

ln Land * ln loan capital 0.2632 0.75<br />

ln Labor * ln Fertilizer -0.6554 -5.10***<br />

ln Labor * ln Irrigation 0.4618 1.74*<br />

ln labor * ln loan capital 0.5470 2.71***<br />

ln fertilizer * ln irrigation 0.6719 3.64***<br />

ln fertilizer * ln loan capital -0.3005 -2.62***<br />

ln irrigation * ln loan capital 0.2687 1.03<br />

Time -0.0219 -4.42***<br />

Time * ln land -0.0291 -0.65<br />

Time * ln labor -0.1087 -3.82***<br />

Time * ln fertilizer -0.0050 -0.45<br />

Time * ln Irrigation -0.0341 -0.91<br />

Time * ln loan capital 0.0491 2.53**<br />

Time * time -0.0050 -2.58***<br />

Model diagnostics<br />

Log likelihood 166.677<br />

σu 2<br />

0.0127 36.89***<br />

σv 2 0.0017 15.58***<br />

γ 0.99<br />

No inefficiency effects (H0: δ0 = δ1 = δ2 = 0) 23.45***<br />

Inefficiency effects function<br />

Constant -0.0742 -0.80<br />

time 0.0274 3.52***<br />

Rainfall 0.0001 0.79<br />

BAAC loan share -0.0001 -4.51***<br />

Number of observations 138<br />

*** Significant at 1% level (p


2694 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 4. Production elasticities and returns to scale.<br />

Inputs Value t-ratio<br />

Land 0.3427 5.41***<br />

Labor 0.8719 16.84***<br />

Irrigation 0.0844 2.11**<br />

Fertilizer 0.0072 0.14<br />

Loan 0.1681 4.51***<br />

Returns to scale 1.4743<br />

*** Significant at 1% level (p


alone. The efficiency scores are particularly high for the<br />

years 1977, 1981, 1982, 1996, 1997 and 1999 (Figure 1).<br />

However, in the later period, from the 1990’s, the<br />

variation between regions has reduced but overall<br />

technical efficiency level somewhat fluctuated and then<br />

rose to a maximum level during the last few years. The<br />

range commensurate with the average reported for<br />

developing economies (for example, Bravo-Ureta et al.,<br />

2007). Figure 2 presents regional distribution of technical<br />

efficiency scores over time. As evident from Figure 2,<br />

region 10 has the highest level of fluctuation in technical<br />

efficiency scores with the lowest average. It should be<br />

noted that observation of high efficiencies with wide<br />

variation across regions may also reflect the use of<br />

aggregated data with reduced variability and a potentially<br />

lower efficient frontier (Helvoigt and Adams, 2009).<br />

Factors affecting technical efficiency<br />

Whereas the time variable in the frontier production<br />

function captures technical change over time (that is,<br />

shifting of the production frontier), in the inefficiency<br />

equation the time variable is intended to capture<br />

inefficiency change (that is, changes in the distance of<br />

the average unit from the sector production frontier). The<br />

positive sign on the coefficient of the time variable in the<br />

inefficiency equation indicates that the distance of the<br />

typical production region from the technical frontier<br />

increased significantly over the study period. However, it<br />

is encouraging to see that the investment channeled<br />

through BAAC loan has a significantly positive impact on<br />

improving technical efficiency.<br />

Productivity growth, technical change and technical<br />

efficiency change<br />

Finally, Table 6 and Figure 3 present the average levels<br />

of technical change, technical efficiency change and<br />

overall TFP growth by year. It is clear from Figure 3 that<br />

TFP initially declined until 1987 and then picked up but<br />

dropped slightly in later years, a pattern also mirrored by<br />

technical efficiency change index. Specifically, overall<br />

TFP declined at an annual rate of -0.6% per annum due<br />

to technical regress at a rate of -2.1% while technical<br />

efficiency improved at a modest rate of 1.5%,<br />

respectively. The overall conclusion is remarkably similar<br />

to those of Krasachat (2001, 2000) and Luh et al. (2008).<br />

Although, Figure 3 shows a clear and smooth pattern, it<br />

hides the level of fluctuation experienced by individual<br />

regions. Table 7 provides these measurements by region.<br />

Only Region 8 experienced positive growth in TFP,<br />

technical change and efficiency change, though, at a very<br />

modest rate. The highest level of technical regress is in<br />

Region 12. In fact, F-test confirmed that significant<br />

differences amongst region exist with respect to technical<br />

Rahmaan et al. 2695<br />

change (Table 7). Figure 4 shows the actual level of<br />

fluctuation in TFP index among regions which tend to be<br />

smoothened towards the end. The implication is that<br />

lagging regions are catching-up with the leading ones,<br />

that is, converging to a common level of productivity<br />

growth.<br />

Testing convergence among regions<br />

Convergence occurs when regions with poorer<br />

productivity level during the initial period grow more<br />

rapidly than regions with high initial level of productivity<br />

implying that the poorer regions are catching up. Table 7<br />

and Figure 4 suggest that none of the regions are<br />

producing at a significantly higher level of productivity as<br />

evident from a narrow range of deviation between<br />

regions, hence, TFP growth is contributed by all of the<br />

regions. In other words, there is no evidence of significant<br />

divergence among the regions. However, more<br />

conclusive results can only be obtained by formally<br />

testing for convergence as discussed subsequently. We<br />

applied the cross-sectional method which examines the<br />

tendency of regions/countries with initial low levels of<br />

productivity to grow relatively faster in order to catch-up<br />

with those of high initial level productivity. Therefore, if<br />

the growth rates are regressed on the initial level of<br />

productivity and the coefficient is negative, there is said<br />

to be Beta convergence. The average growth rate of<br />

productivity for each region i between year 0 and T can<br />

be defined as:<br />

gi,T = T-1 (yi,t – yi,0)<br />

Then, a test of Beta convergence is conducted by a<br />

regression of growth rate as the dependent variable with<br />

the initial level of productivity as the regressor as follows:<br />

g ��<br />

� �y<br />

� �<br />

i,<br />

t<br />

i,<br />

0 i,<br />

T<br />

Where; � and � are parameters and �i,T is an error term<br />

with a zero mean and finite variance. Convergence exists<br />

if the value of � is negative and significant. The result of<br />

this exercise is presented in Table 8. The estimated<br />

parameter �, which is the coefficient of the initial level of<br />

productivity level is negative and significant at 1%<br />

confidence level. This provides strong evidence that<br />

agricultural productivity in Northern Thailand has<br />

converged. In other words, regions with initial poor level<br />

of productivity grew faster and are catching up with the<br />

high productivity regions.<br />

Another simple cross-sectional test for convergence is<br />

the Sigma convergence, which holds if the crosssectional<br />

standard deviations of the log of TFP decrease<br />

over time. In other words, it tests whether the productivity<br />

differences among regions are narrowing over time.<br />

(8)<br />

(


2696 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Figure 1. Distribution of technical efficiency by year (Box-plots).<br />

Figure 2. Distribution of technical efficiency by region (Box-plots).


Indices<br />

TFP index<br />

1.20<br />

1.10<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

1977<br />

1978<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1982<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

Year<br />

1990<br />

Rahmaan et al. 2697<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

Technical change Efficiency change Malmquist index<br />

Figure 3. Technical change, efficiency change and productivity grow th in Northern Thai agriculture, 1977 to 1999.<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

1978<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1982<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

Year<br />

1989<br />

Region 8 Region 9 Region 10 Region 11<br />

Region 12 Region 13<br />

Figure 4. Total factor productivity grow th by region, 1978 to 1999.<br />

Technically, a necessary condition for Sigma<br />

convergence is the existence of Beta convergence<br />

although Beta convergence does not guarantee a<br />

reduction in the distribution of dispersion among TFP<br />

growth rates (Thirtle et al., 2003). Figure 5 shows that the<br />

cross-sectional standard deviations for the log of TFP<br />

over time are in fact fluctuating within a narrow range,<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

which further corroborate the result obtained from Beta<br />

convergence test.<br />

Evidence of productivity convergence in Thailand<br />

should not be treated as exceptional. There are<br />

evidences of convergence in agricultural productivity and<br />

its components in Asia. Wu (2000) found that overall TFP<br />

growth in China has shown signs of convergence since<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999


2698 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Standard deviation of log of TFP<br />

Stdev of log of TFP<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

1978<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1982<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

Year<br />

Figure 5. Sigma convergence: standard deviations of the logarithm of TFP index.<br />

Table 6. TFP grow th and its components by year.<br />

Year Technical change Efficiency change TFP change (Malmquist index)<br />

1977 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000<br />

1978 0.9156 0.9722 0.8901<br />

1979 0.9240 0.9970 0.9213<br />

1980 0.9260 1.0411 0.9640<br />

1981 0.9301 0.9909 0.9216<br />

1982 0.9394 1.0265 0.9643<br />

1983 0.9511 0.9958 0.9471<br />

1984 0.9621 0.9630 0.9265<br />

1985 0.9648 0.9317 0.8989<br />

1986 0.9614 0.9105 0.8753<br />

1987 0.9601 0.9795 0.9404<br />

1988 0.9630 1.0057 0.9686<br />

1989 0.9683 1.0337 1.0009<br />

1990 0.9784 1.0696 1.0465<br />

1991 1.0007 1.0621 1.0628<br />

1992 1.0190 1.0714 1.0918<br />

1993 1.0236 1.0824 1.1080<br />

1994 1.0231 1.0566 1.0810<br />

1995 1.0247 1.0505 1.0764<br />

1996 1.0304 1.0473 1.0791<br />

1997 1.0322 1.0339 1.0672<br />

1998 1.0216 1.0506 1.0733<br />

1999 1.0088 1.0009 1.0096<br />

Mean 0.9788 1.0152 0.9937<br />

the 1990’s with technical efficiency across regions having<br />

converged as early as the 1980’s. Rahman (2007)<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

showed that productivity growth in Bangladeshi regions<br />

has converged during the mature stage of Green<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999


Table 7. TFP grow th and its components by region.<br />

Rahmaan et al. 2699<br />

Region Technical change Efficiency change TFP change (Malmquist index)<br />

8 1.0125 1.0076 1.0203<br />

9 1.0027 0.9985 1.0011<br />

10 0.9805 1.0014 0.9819<br />

11 0.9734 0.9986 0.9721<br />

12 0.9292 1.0083 0.9369<br />

13 0.9707 1.0006 0.9713<br />

Mean 0.9788 1.0152 0.9937<br />

Difference among regions<br />

F-value (5,126) 11.35*** 0.02 1.14<br />

*** Significant at 1% level (p


2700 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

rice export taxation in Thailand: a historical simulation exercise,<br />

1950-1985. J. Asian Econ., 17: 103-125.<br />

Coelli TJ (1995). Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic<br />

frontier function: a Monte-Carlo analysis. J. Prod. Anal., 6: 247–268.<br />

Coelli T, Rao DSP, Battese GE (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and<br />

Productivity Analysis. Kluwer <strong>Academic</strong> Publishers, Boston.<br />

Coelli T, Rahman S, Thirtle C (2003). Stochastic frontier approach to<br />

Total Factor Productivity measurement in Bangladesh crop<br />

agriculture, 1961–92. J. Inter. Dev., 15: 321-333.<br />

Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985). The Measurement of<br />

Efficiency of Production, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff publishers.<br />

Helvoigt, TL, Adams DM (2009). A stochastic frontier analysis of<br />

technical progress, efficiency change and productivity growth in the<br />

Pacific Northwest saw mill industry. For. Policy Econ., 11: 280-287.<br />

Krasachat W (2001). Land use and productivity growth in Thai<br />

agriculture. Kasetsart University J. Econ., 8: 14-28.<br />

Krasachat W (2000). Measurement of technical efficiency in Thai<br />

agricultural production. In proceedings of the International<br />

Conference on The Chao Phraya Delta: Historical Development,<br />

Dynamics and Challenges of Thailand’s Rice Bowl. Kasetsart<br />

University, Bangkok, Thaïland.<br />

Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis.<br />

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.<br />

Luh Y-H, Chang CC, Huang FM (2008). Efficiency change and<br />

productivity growth in agriculture: a comparative analysis for selected<br />

East Asian economies. J. Asian Econ., 19: 312-324.<br />

Mukherjee AN, Kuroda Y (2003). Productivity growth in Indian<br />

agriculture: is there evidence of convergence across states? Agric,<br />

Econ., 29: 43-53.<br />

OAE (undated). Statistical Yearbooks (various issues). Office of<br />

Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture, Thailand.<br />

Rahman S (2007). Regional productivity and convergence in<br />

Bangladesh agriculture. J. Develop. Areas, 43: 221-236.<br />

Sauer J, Frohberg K, Hockmann H (2006). Stochastic efficiency<br />

measurement: the curse of theoretical consistency. J. Appl. Econ., 9:<br />

139-165.<br />

Suphannachart W, Warr P (2010). Total Factor Productivity in Thai<br />

Agriculture: Measurement and Determinants. ARE Working Paper<br />

No. 2553/1. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,<br />

Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok.<br />

Thirtle C, Piesse J, Lusigi A, Suhariyanto K (2003). Multi-factor<br />

agricultural productivity, efficiency and convergence in Botswana,<br />

1981-1996”. J. Dev. Econ., 71: 605-624.<br />

Wu Y (2000), Is China’s economic growth sustainable? a productivity<br />

analysis. China Econ. Rev., 11: 278-296.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2701-2712, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.488<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Dynamics of on-farm management of potato (Solanum<br />

tuberosum) cultivars in Central Kenya<br />

C. Lung’aho 1 *, G. Chemining’wa 2 , S. Shibairo 2 and M. Hutchinson 2<br />

1 Kenya Agricultural Research Institute -Tigoni, P.O. Box 338-00219 Limuru, Kenya.<br />

2 Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 29053-00625 Kangemi,<br />

Nairobi, Kenya.<br />

Accepted 7 December, 2011<br />

Studies to understand the dynamic nature of farmers’ management of potato and assess the extent of<br />

genetic erosion and farmers’ perceptions of genetic erosion in potato were conducted in Kiambu West<br />

district in 2006. A stratified random sampling procedure was used to draw a sample of 302 farmers for<br />

the study. Majority of the farmers interviewed obtained seeds from informal sources. Farmers identified<br />

29 varieties which were once widely grown in the study area. Of these, only 9 are still grown while<br />

another 11 have been introduced. The most commonly grown varieties were Zangi (69.4%), Tigoni<br />

(41.4%), Thima Thuti (30.8%) and Karuse (20.9%). Twenty cultivars including Amin, Anett, Cardinal,<br />

Feldeslohn, Gituru, Kiraya, Kibururu, Kenya Baraka, Kenya Dhamana, Karora Iguru, Maritta, Mirka, Njae,<br />

Njine, Patrones, Romano, Roslin Bvumbwe, Roslin Gucha, Suzanna and Furaha were the most affected<br />

by genetic erosion. The most important causes for abandonment of varieties were low yields, rapid<br />

greening, susceptibility to late blight, strong dormancy, sensitivity to drought, and susceptibility to<br />

bacterial wilt, susceptibility to potato tuber moth, poor storability and poor cooking quality. The<br />

emergence of new and better varieties, lack of markets and lack of seed were the three most cited nonvarietal<br />

reasons for abandoning varieties. Farmers were not bothered by the loss of varieties. When<br />

comparing varieties currently cultivated to formerly available varieties, a genetic erosion of 31.0% was<br />

computed suggesting that genetic loss has occurred in the study area. Results of this study suggested<br />

that it is necessary to initiate collection, characterization and conservation studies of potato varieties<br />

across the country. There is also the need for awareness creation on the importance of potato genetic<br />

resources and their conservation.<br />

Key words: Conservation, genetic erosion, farmers’ perceptions, Kenya, potato, seed sources, Solanum<br />

tuberosum, variety abandonment.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The continuing need for improved crops to cope with new<br />

environmental and changing consumer demands creates<br />

a constant requirement for genetic diversity, but the pool<br />

of natural diversity is shrinking with time largely, because<br />

of the negative actions of humans (Guarino, 1999). The<br />

loss of genetic diversity results in increasing vulnerability<br />

of crops to changing abiotic and biotic stresses and<br />

threatens global food security (Hawkes et al., 2000). The<br />

concept of genetic erosion in agriculture can be applied<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: lungahocs@yahoo.com.<br />

at three different levels of integration: at crop level as an<br />

impoverishment in the assemblage of crops used in<br />

agriculture, at the level of varieties of a specific crop or at<br />

the level of alleles (van de Wouw et al., 2009).<br />

The present threats to biodiversity from genetic erosion<br />

and extinction were recognized by the Convention on<br />

Biological Diversity’s (CBD’s) Global Strategy for Plant<br />

Conservation (CBD, 2002) which in Target 9 called for<br />

conservation of 70% of the genetic diversity of crops and<br />

other major socioeconomically valuable plant species.<br />

Further, the 2010 biodiversity target committed the<br />

parties ‘to achieve by 2010 a significant reduction of the<br />

current rate of biodiversity loss at the global, regional and


2702 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

national levels as a contribution to poverty alleviation and<br />

to the benefit of all life on earth’. From the dawn of<br />

modern plant breeding, there has been apprehension that<br />

replacement of traditional crop varieties with improved<br />

varieties poses a risk to biological diversity (Harlan, 1975;<br />

Vellve, 1993). It has previously been suggested that plant<br />

breeding is a strong force in the reduction of genetic<br />

diversity’ (Gepts, 2006), and introduction of modern<br />

cultivars has been cited as evidence of genetic erosion<br />

(Bennett, 1973). It is however, unclear to what extent the<br />

onset of modern breeding efforts has really affected<br />

diversity levels in crops (van de Wouw et al., 2009).<br />

Frankel and Bennett (1970) referred to such a decrease<br />

in crop diversity as genetic erosion (GE). The traditional<br />

perception of genetic erosion is that of the loss of a stable<br />

and diverse set of locally adapted landraces resulting<br />

from the adoption of a small number of modern varieties<br />

(Hawkes, 1983; Brush, 1999). On the basis of this<br />

perspective, genetic erosion is considered to be the<br />

disappearance of named varieties in the regions where<br />

they were previously grown (for example, Hammer et al.,<br />

1996).<br />

Maxted and Guarino (2006) defined genetic erosion as<br />

the permanent reduction in richness (or evenness) of<br />

common local alleles, or the loss of combinations of<br />

alleles over time in a defined area. Brown (2008) defined<br />

genetic erosion as a process that refers to a change in<br />

genetic diversity over time, and considered it to be<br />

difficult to specify in an index or indicator since monitoring<br />

changes in the rate of genetic erosion strictly requires a<br />

direct comparable if not identical measures of the state of<br />

a system at several points in time. More recently, van de<br />

Wouw (2009) reviewed the concept of genetic erosion<br />

and concluded that genetic erosion as reflected in a<br />

reduction of allelic evenness and richness appears to be<br />

the most useful definition, but has to be viewed in<br />

conjunction with events at variety level. To date, there is<br />

no simple technique available that can adequately<br />

measure the genetic erosion of crop diversity. This is<br />

partly attributable to the huge data requirements needed<br />

to cover all the disciplines involved (for example,<br />

agronomy, plant protection, genetics, population biology,<br />

ecology, economics, sociology, ethno-botany), and the<br />

paucity of time series data on landraces. The dynamic nature of<br />

crop evolution, whereby genetic diversity is added and lost<br />

from plant populations through time (Wood and Lenne,<br />

1997; Brush, 1999; Tunstall et al., 2001) also complicated<br />

the study of genetic erosion. There is also a dearth of<br />

information on the selection and maintenance of<br />

landraces by traditional farmers (Zeven, 2002). According<br />

to Wood and Lenne (1997) and Brush (1999), information<br />

on the conservation and use of genetic diversity in<br />

traditional agricultural systems remain largely empirical<br />

and anecdotal. Therefore, most of the available<br />

information regarding genetic diversity of landraces is not<br />

consistent and/or not adequately explored.<br />

The degree of genetic erosion faced by a particular<br />

crop in a certain region over time can be estimated using<br />

a number of approaches including making comparisons<br />

between the number of species/cultivars still in use by<br />

farmers at the present time and those found in previous<br />

studies or interviewing farmers about varieties that used<br />

to be grown in a particular area (van de Wouw et al.,<br />

2009). The latter approach has been applied to estimate<br />

the extent of GE in wheat (Teklu and Hammer, 2006;<br />

Tsegaye and Berg, 2007), sorghum (Mekbib, 2007) and<br />

cassava (Willemen et al., 2007).<br />

There is, however, little information on the level of<br />

genetic erosion of potato in Kenya. This is despite the<br />

fact that the crop has been grown in the country since the<br />

late nineteenth century (Durr and Lorenzl, 1980). In a<br />

study on evaluation, choice and use of potato varieties in<br />

Kenya, Crissman (1989) reported that some older<br />

varieties had been rejected by farmers, but no attempt<br />

was made to estimate the extent of genetic erosion. The<br />

objectives of this study were to: i) understand the<br />

dynamic nature of farmers’ management of potato; and ii)<br />

assess the extent of genetic erosion (GE) and farmers’<br />

perceptions of genetic erosion in Kiambu West district in<br />

Kenya.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Study area<br />

The study was done in three divisions: Limuru, Ndeiya and Tigoni of<br />

Kiambu West district in central province of Kenya between February<br />

and March, 2006. The altitude in the study area varies between<br />

1800 and 3000 m above sea level. Agroecological zones include<br />

Upper Highland (UH0 to UH2), Lower Highlands (LH1 to LH5) and<br />

Upper Midlands (UM3, UM5 and UM6). The district borders, Lari<br />

district to the North, Naivasha district to the West, Kikuyu and<br />

Kajiado districts to the South and Kiambu East district towards the<br />

east. The farming system of the study area is a typical crop-based<br />

mixed, crop–livestock mixed production. Production is rain-fed with<br />

most households growing a number of crop types and varieties.<br />

The three divisions are readily accessible to markets.<br />

Sampling procedures<br />

Kiambu West district was purposively chosen as the study area<br />

because of; (i) its importance in potato production; (ii) its long<br />

history of growing potatoes hence, has ideal sites for study on farm<br />

GE; (iii) the diverse cropping systems; (iv) the area has been<br />

exposed to market forces and other externalities that influence onfarm<br />

diversity of potato; and (v) its proximity to the Kenya<br />

Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) Tigoni Research Centre,<br />

which permits access to many varieties since this is the institute<br />

mandated with potato variety development in the country.<br />

Farmers were selected using stratified sampling techniques<br />

whereby the three major potato growing locations in each division<br />

were chosen and within each location, farmers were selected at<br />

random from a list of potato-growers obtained from the local<br />

agricultural extension offices across all locations and sub-locations<br />

within a division.<br />

Questionnaire development<br />

Information about varieties grown in 1989 was obtained from


secondary literature and key informant interviews. The key<br />

informant interviews were conducted with special potato knowledge<br />

holders in the farming community and involved interviewing<br />

agricultural extension officers, key farmers, potato traders and<br />

market vendors in the target area. A questionnaire was then<br />

formulated based on information from the key informant interviews<br />

and secondary literature. The questionnaire captured information<br />

on i) farmer’s seed sources, ii) identification and naming of<br />

varieties, iii) varieties grown, iv) varieties no longer grown and the<br />

reasons for not growing them, and v) farmers’ perception on genetic<br />

erosion. The questionnaire was pretested with 15 farmers in each<br />

of the three divisions and then revised accordingly. The final<br />

version consisted of both open-ended and closed questions.<br />

Field survey<br />

Interviews were conducted in farmers’ potato fields to permit crosschecking<br />

of their answers with field observations where applicable.<br />

A total of 302 farmers comprising 100 farmers from Limuru, 110<br />

from Ndeiya and 92 from Tigoni division, respectively, were<br />

interviewed. Enumerators were drawn from extension personnel<br />

from the Ministry of Agriculture and the KARI-Tigoni Research<br />

Centre. The interviews were conducted either in the national<br />

language (Kiswahili) or the local language (Kikuyu), depending on<br />

the language competencies of the respondents.<br />

Data analysis<br />

Survey data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, data<br />

explorations and cross-tabulations based on the Statistical Package<br />

for Social Scientists (SSPS) version 16 computer software. Pearson<br />

chi-square (χ 2 ) tests were used to determine whether there were<br />

significant associations between variables at p≤0.10 (Steel et al.,<br />

1997). The extent of genetic erosion, expressed as loss of potato<br />

cultivars grown by farmers was computed as the ratio of the number<br />

of varieties currently available to their former number using two<br />

parameters; genetic erosion and genetic integrity as indicated by<br />

Hammer et al.(1996) but as modified by Mekbib (2007). Genetic<br />

erosion (GE) = 100% - Genetic Integrity (GI). Genetic integrity (GI)<br />

= C2006/C1989 × 100, where C2006 is the number of varieties grown by<br />

farmers in 2006 (the year the survey was conducted) and C1989 is<br />

the number of varieties grown by farmers in 1989. The year, 1989<br />

was chosen for comparison because there was a documented<br />

evidence of many of the varieties that were grown in this area<br />

during that time (Crissman, 1989) while the year 2006 was the year<br />

when the survey was done. In using names of potato cultivars as a<br />

proxy indicator for diversity in the study area, consideration was<br />

made of the following factors: (i) potato is clonally propagated and<br />

genetic integrity is maintained over relatively long periods of time,<br />

and (ii) the community members in the study area belonging to the<br />

same ethnic group share a common history, and have similar socioeconomic<br />

and cultural environments. The farming system and<br />

cropping patterns are also fairly similar thus; information shared<br />

concerning crop species and cultivar names, most likely, remains<br />

consistent. It was therefore, assumed that names of potato cultivars<br />

identified by farmers could be used as a proxy indicator for genetic<br />

diversity within the species.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Farmer attributes<br />

The characteristics of the potato farmers interviewed are<br />

Lung'aho et al. 2703<br />

presented in Table 1. Majority of the farmers surveyed in<br />

the three divisions were females (67.5%). Most of the<br />

farmers surveyed were 30 to 50 years (36.1%) and over<br />

51 years old (60.3%). The farmers had stayed in the<br />

respective areas for relatively long periods, with most of<br />

them having been resident in their divisions for over 20<br />

years (57.0%). Average farm sizes were generally small<br />

with 37.1% of the farmers owning less than 1 acre and<br />

36.8% owning 1 to 5 acres. Only 1.3% of the farmers had<br />

acreages greater than 20 acres. On the average, most of<br />

the farmers were experienced in potato growing with<br />

41.1% of the farmers having grown the crop for over 20<br />

years and 29.5% having grown the crop for between 16<br />

and 20 years. Only 0.7% of the farmers had grown the<br />

crop for periods ranging from 1 to 5 years.<br />

Sources of seed<br />

Table 2 lists the sources of potato seed identified by<br />

farmers. Only 23, 8.2 and 13.2% of the farmers in Limuru,<br />

Ndeiya and Tigoni, respectively, obtained seeds from<br />

sources likely to produce high quality seed such as seed<br />

growers and research institutions. Use of own seed<br />

saved from previous harvest was the most important<br />

source of seed for farmers in all the divisions. The<br />

second most important source of seed in all the three<br />

divisions was the market while neighbours comprised the<br />

third most important source of seed. In nearly all the<br />

cases (95%), only small sized tubers were saved as<br />

seed. None of the farmers interviewed had a specialized<br />

plot for seed production purposes.<br />

Varieties known and planted by farmers<br />

Details about farmers’ knowledge and awareness of<br />

varieties are presented in Table 3 and were generally<br />

similar across the three divisions. Seventeen of the 40<br />

varieties named by farmers had local names with 13 of<br />

them being in the local dialect. All the farmers’ given<br />

names referred to dominant criteria such as<br />

morphological characteristics, productive capacity, an<br />

important person or event that coincided with the time the<br />

variety was introduced, the person who introduced the<br />

cultivar and similarity with other cultivars.<br />

Except for older varieties such as Amin, Gituru, Kiraya,<br />

Mirka, Njine, Njae, Patrones and Roslin Gucha, 32 other<br />

varieties were known by more than 69.9% of the<br />

respondents. None of the respondents had grown or<br />

knew anyone growing some 20 varieties (Amin, Anett,<br />

Cardinal, Feldeslohn, Furaha, Gituru, Kenya Baraka,<br />

Kenya Dhamana, Karora Iguru, Kibururu, Kiraya, Maritta,<br />

Mirka, Njae, Njine, Patrones, Roslin Bvumbwe, Roslin<br />

Tana, Romano and Suzanna) that had been previously<br />

grown in the survey area in the past five years prior to the<br />

survey. The varieties known by respondents ranged from


2704 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 1. Farmer characteristics in the three divisions surveyed (percentage of respondents).<br />

Attribute Limuru (n = 100) Ndeiya (n = 110) Tigoni (n = 92) Total (n = 302)<br />

Sex<br />

Male 35.0 30.9 31.5 32.5<br />

Female 65.0 69.1 68.5 67.5<br />

Age<br />

18-29 years 6.0 4.5 0.0 3.6<br />

30-50 years 36.0 35.5 37.0 36.1<br />

Over 50 years 58.0 60.0 63.0 60.3<br />

Period of stay<br />

11-15 years 14.0 16.4 16.3 15.6<br />

16-20 years 24.0 30.9 27.2 27.5<br />

Over 20 years 62.0 52.7 56.5 57.0<br />

Farm size<br />

< 1 acre 9.0 32.7 72.8 37.1<br />

1-5 acres 36.0 45.5 27.2 36.8<br />

6-10 acres 26.0 19.1 0.0 15.6<br />

11-20 acres 25.0 2.7 0.0 9.3<br />

Over 20 acres< 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.3<br />

Household size<br />

1-2 persons 10.0 9.1 7.6 8.9<br />

3-5 persons 59.0 48.2 60.9 55.6<br />

Over 5 persons 31.0 42.7 31.5 35.4<br />

Experience in potato growing<br />

1-5 years 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.7<br />

6-10 years 12.0 7.3 8.7 9.3<br />

11-15 years 15.0 19.1 25.0 19.5<br />

16-20 years 33.0 26.4 29.3 29.5<br />

Over 20 years 38.0 47.3 37.0 41.1<br />

Table 2. Sources of seed for potato farmers in Limuru, Ndeiya and Tigoni (in percentage).<br />

Division<br />

Sources of seed (%) a<br />

Own seeds Market Neighbour Traders Seed grower/research<br />

Limuru (n = 100) 100 57.0 47.0 6.0 23.0<br />

Ndeiya (n = 110) 100 76.4 32.7 1.8 8.2<br />

Tigoni (n = 92) 100 79.3 34.8 0.0 13.0<br />

Total (n = 302) 100 70.9 38.1 2.6 14.6<br />

a Multiple responses possible.<br />

23 to 40. Table 4 shows that about 42% of the farmers<br />

knew 35 to 40 varieties while 38.1% were familiar with 31<br />

to 35 varieties. Approximately 19.0% of the farmers knew<br />

26 to 30 varieties. Table 4 also shows that older farmers<br />

tended to know more varieties. The longer the growing<br />

period of potatoes the more the varieties a farmer tended<br />

to know (Table 5). About ninety eight percent of the<br />

farmers who had grown potatoes for over 20 years knew<br />

35 to 40 varieties. None of the farmers who had grown<br />

potatoes for less than 6 years could identify more than 30<br />

varieties. The number of varieties planted by farmers<br />

since the beginning cultivation of potatoes ranged from


Table 3. Farmers’ knowledge and awareness of varieties (percentage of respondents).<br />

Variety<br />

Limuru<br />

(n = 100)<br />

Known by farmer<br />

Ndeiya<br />

(n = 110)<br />

Tigoni<br />

(n = 92)<br />

Total<br />

(n = 302)<br />

Lung'aho et al. 2705<br />

Planted by farmer or person known to the farmer<br />

Limuru<br />

(n = 100)<br />

Ndeiya<br />

(n = 110)<br />

Tigoni<br />

(n = 92)<br />

Total<br />

(n = 302)<br />

Roslin Gucha 40.0 50.0 50.0 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Feldeslohn 69.0 73.6 66.3 69.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Njine abc 41.0 59.1 48.9 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Mukori abc 100 100 100 100 31.0 25.5 26.1 27.5<br />

Desiree 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Nyayo ae 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Kerr’s Pink 100 100 100 100 61.0 48.2 48.9 52.6<br />

Maritta 94.0 93.6 93.5 93.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Anett 100 100 100 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Kenya Baraka 100 100 100 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Roslin Tana 100 100 98.9 99.7 31.0 22.7 22.8 25.5<br />

Njae abc 41.0 38.2 31.5 37.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Suzanna ae 76.0 71.8 63.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Arka 93.0 97.3 95.7 95.4 24.0 40.9 30.4 32.1<br />

Dutch Robijn 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Roslin Bvumbwe 98.0 92.7 91.3 94.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Cardinal 95.0 92.7 91.3 93.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Gituru abc 48.0 47.3 37.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Amin ae 59.0 70.0 57.6 62.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Kiraya abc 64.0 50.0 44.6 53.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Kihoro abc 100 100 100 100 61.0 48.2 48.9 52.6<br />

Kibururu abc 100 100 100 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Karora –Iguru abc 98.0 92.7 91.3 94.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Tana Kimande abc 99.0 100 100 99.7 100 100 100 100<br />

Tigoni 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Asante 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Karuse abe 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Thima Thuti abd 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Kenya Dhamana 98.0 100 100 99.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Furaha 100 100 100 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Zangi ae 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Kenya Sifa 100 100 100 100 56.0 66.4 56.5 59.9<br />

Kenya Mavuno 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Kenya Karibu 100 100 100 100 86.0 89.1 79.3 85.1<br />

Romano 98.0 99.1 91.3 96.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Roslin Eburu (B53) 98.0 100 100 99.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.7<br />

Meru Mugaruru abfg 99.0 100 100 99.7 39.0 51.8 51.1 47.4<br />

Ndera Mwana abd 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Mirka 34.0 42.7 31.5 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Patrones 30.0 39.1 28.3 32.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

a- refers to local name given by farmers; b- refers to name in the local dialect-Kikuyu; c- refers to a morphological characteristics; d- refers to<br />

productive capacity, e- refers to an important person/event that coincided with introduction of the variety; f- refers to the person who introduced the<br />

cultivar and g- refers to morphological similarity with another cultivar.<br />

11 to 17. Most of them had planted between 15 to16<br />

varieties (Table 6). There was no relationship between<br />

the number of varieties known by a farmer and the<br />

number of varieties they had ever planted (r 2 = -0.58, p =<br />

0.316). On the average, majority of the farmers had<br />

planted two varieties (83.4%) during the survey (Table 6).<br />

None of the farmers surveyed had planted more than 3<br />

varieties.


2706 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 4. Relationship between age of farmer and number of varieties known (percentage of<br />

respondents).<br />

Number of varieties known<br />

18-29 years<br />

(n = 11)<br />

Age of farmer<br />

30-50 years<br />

(n = 109)<br />

Over 51 years<br />

(n = 182)<br />

Total<br />

(n = 302)<br />

20-25 0.0 2.8 0.5 1.3<br />

26-30 72.7 28.4 9.3 18.5<br />

31-35 27.3 51.4 30.8 38.1<br />

35-40 0.0 17.4 59.3 42.1<br />

Total 100 100 100 100<br />

Table 5. Relationship between experience in potato growing and number of varieties known<br />

(percentage of respondents).<br />

Number of varieties known<br />

1-5<br />

(n = 2)<br />

Experience in growing potatoes (years)<br />

6-10<br />

(n = 28)<br />

11-15<br />

(n = 59)<br />

16-20<br />

(n = 89)<br />

20<<br />

(n = 124)<br />

Total<br />

(n = 302)<br />

20-25 50.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3<br />

26-30 50.0 75.0 57.6 0.0 0.0 18.5<br />

31-35 0.0 14.3 42.4 94.4 1.6 38.1<br />

35-40 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 98.4 42.1<br />

Table 6. Number of varieties planted by a farmer or person known to farmer, number of varieties currently planted by the farmers and<br />

characteristics used to distinguish varieties (percentage of respondents).<br />

Variety<br />

Limuru<br />

(n = 100)<br />

Division<br />

Ndeiya<br />

(n = 110)<br />

Tigoni<br />

(n = 92)<br />

Total<br />

(n = 302)<br />

Number of varieties planted by farmers since the beginning of potato growth<br />

10-12 14.0 10.9 20.7 14.9<br />

15-16 85.0 89.1 79.3 84.8<br />

17-18 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3<br />

Number of varieties currently planted by farmers<br />

One 0 0 0 0<br />

Two 82.0 83.6 84.8 83.4<br />

Three 18.0 16.4 15.2 16.6<br />

Characteristics used to distinguish varieties<br />

Tubers 79.0 75.5 78.3 77.5<br />

Foliage 13.0 11.8 5.4 10.3<br />

Tubers + foliage 8.0 12.7 16.3 12.3<br />

Identification of varieties<br />

There was no difference in the characteristics farmers<br />

used by farmers to distinguish varieties across the three<br />

divisions (χ 2 = 5.903; d.f = 4; p = 0.207). Varieties were<br />

mainly distinguished according to tuber characteristics<br />

across the three divisions. Table 6 shows that the use of<br />

tuber characteristics (77.5%) was the most common<br />

method employed by farmers to distinguish varieties.<br />

Foliage characteristics were used by only 10.3% of the<br />

farmers while 12.3% indicated that they used both tuber<br />

and foliage characteristics to identify varieties. Tuber<br />

attributes included the shape, skin colour and sprout<br />

characteristics while foliage characteristics mainly


Table 7. Varieties grown by farmers in the three divisions surveyed (percentage of respondents).<br />

1 Variety Tuber skin colour<br />

Proportion of farmers growing (%)<br />

Limuru (n = 100) Ndeiya (n = 110) Tigoni (n = 92)<br />

Tigoni White 67.0 16.8 42.1<br />

Zangi Red 82.0 65.4 62.1<br />

Karuse Red 0.0 38.3 23.2<br />

Meru Red 0.0 6.5 8.4<br />

Nyayo White 17.0 5.6 15.8<br />

Ndera Mwana Red 2.0 39.3 16.8<br />

Asante Red 0.0 9.3 15.8<br />

Tana Kimande White 3.0 4.7 1.1<br />

Thima Thuti White 48.0 22.4 22.1<br />

Dutch Robijn Red 0.0 5.6 10.5<br />

1 All farmers grew more than one variety.<br />

Table 8. Reasons cited by farmers for abandoning eight of the most commonly abandoned varieties (percentage of respondents).<br />

a Reason<br />

Tigoni<br />

n = 501<br />

Nyayo<br />

n = 783<br />

Desiree<br />

n = 582<br />

Roslin tana<br />

n = 78<br />

Tana kimande<br />

n = 381<br />

Anett<br />

n = 42<br />

Lung'aho et al. 2707<br />

Roslin eburu<br />

(B53) n = 27<br />

Dutch robjin<br />

n = 309<br />

Rapid greening 29.3 10.0 - 16.7 - - 14.8 -<br />

Low yields 32.7 32.4 33.3 26.9 33.1 33.3 18.5 33.3<br />

Susceptible to late blight disease 25.3 26.6 22.9 16.7 3.4 33.3 - 19.4<br />

Strong dormancy 0.6 0.8 24.9 - 26.0 16.7 25.9 -<br />

Sensitive to drought conditions - 0.9 2.7 10.3 1.6 - 33.3 7.8<br />

Long maturity period - - - - 24.1 - - -<br />

Susceptible to bacterial disease 8.2 19.8 16.0 1.3 9.2 2.4 - 26.2<br />

Susceptible to moth infestation 3.8 4.0 0.2 - 2.6 14.3 - 13.6<br />

Poor storability - 5.6 - 28.2 - - - -<br />

Poor cooking qualities - - - - - - 7.4 -<br />

a Multiple answers possible.<br />

consisted of the flower colour and nature of the foliage.<br />

Predominant varieties and number of varieties grown<br />

During the survey period, only ten varieties were found in<br />

farmers’ fields (Table 7). The most common varieties<br />

across the three divisions were Zangi (69.4%), Tigoni<br />

(41.4%), Thima Thuti (30.8%) and Karuse (20.9%). Only<br />

three of the ten varieties (Tigoni, Dutch Robijn and<br />

Asante) were improved varieties developed by the<br />

Kenyan potato programme.<br />

The varieties grown as indicated by the respondents<br />

differed significantly across the divisions. Varieties<br />

Asante, Dutch Robijn, Karuse, Meru and Ndera Mwana<br />

were common in Ndeiya and Tigoni but not in Limuru.<br />

Varieties like Thima Thuti, Tigoni and Zangi were grown<br />

across the three divisions but tended to be more common<br />

in Limuru. Nyayo was more common in Limuru and<br />

Tigoni than in Ndeiya. There was no clear pattern for<br />

farmers’ preference for either red or white skinned<br />

varieties across the three divisions.<br />

Variety abandonment<br />

Reasons for variety abandonment<br />

Farmers reported that they had rejected some varieties<br />

and replaced them with others. Reasons for rejection<br />

were grouped into two: varietal reasons and non-varietal<br />

reasons.<br />

Varietal reasons: Farmers cited eight reasons as being<br />

the most important in rejection of varieties (Table 8).<br />

These included: rapid greening; low yields, susceptibility<br />

to late blight, strong dormancy, sensitivity to drought<br />

conditions, long maturity period, susceptibility to bacterial<br />

wilt, susceptibility to tuber moth, poor storability, and poor<br />

cooking qualities. The reason for rejecting a variety was


2708 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 9. Non-varietal reasons cited by farmers for abandoning varieties (in percentage).<br />

Reason<br />

Limuru (n = 100)<br />

Ndeiya (n = 110)<br />

Tigoni (n = 92)<br />

Total (n = 302)<br />

Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3<br />

Better varieties came 61.0 4.0 35.0 55.5 5.5 39.1 56.5 14.1 29.3 57.6 7.6 34.8<br />

Poor markets 11.0 69.0 20.0 20.9 43.6 35.5 4.3 64.1 31.5 12.6 58.3 29.1<br />

Lack of seeds 28.0 27.0 45.0 23.6 50.9 25.5 39.1 21.7 39.1 29.8 34.1 35.1<br />

Multiple responses possible.<br />

dependent on the variety itself, although, many of<br />

the varieties were rejected for similar reasons.<br />

Most of the farmers who rejected variety Tigoni<br />

cited low yields (32.7%), rapid greening (29.3%)<br />

and susceptibility to late blight (25.3%) as the<br />

most important reasons for rejecting it. Nyayo was<br />

rejected because of low yields (34.2%),<br />

susceptibility to late blight (26.6%) and<br />

susceptibility to bacterial wilt (19.8%). Desiree<br />

was rejected for low yields (33.3%), strong<br />

dormancy (24.9%) and susceptibility to late blight<br />

(22.9%). Roslin Tana was rejected because of low<br />

yields (26.9%), rapid greening (16.7%) and<br />

susceptibility to late blight (16.7%). The most<br />

important reasons for rejecting Tana Kimande<br />

were low yields (33.1%), strong dormancy<br />

(26.0%) and long maturity period (24.1%). Anett<br />

was rejected because of low yields (33.3%),<br />

susceptibility to late blight (33.3) and strong<br />

dormancy (16.7%). Roslin Eburu was rejected<br />

because of low yields (27.8%), sensitivity to<br />

drought (22.2%) and rapid greening (22.2%).<br />

Table 10. Method for variety abandonment used by farmers (percentage of respondents).<br />

Method for variety abandonment Limuru (n = 100) Ndeiya (n = 110) Tigoni (n = 92) Total (n = 302)<br />

Consume or sell all seed 97.3 98.9 98.6 98.3<br />

Leave seed to deteriorate and throw away 2.7 1.1 1.4 1.7<br />

Dutch Robijn was rejected because of low yields<br />

(33.0%), susceptibility to bacterial wilt (26.2%)<br />

and late blight susceptibility (19.4%). None of the<br />

farmers interviewed reported that they rejected<br />

any variety due to small sized tubers.<br />

Most of the farmers indicated that discarding of<br />

an older variety will only occur after the older and<br />

new varieties have been grown together for<br />

several seasons, permitting comparison. During<br />

the observation period, the acreage of the older<br />

varieties will be progressively reduced in favor of<br />

the new variety. Non-varietal reasons: Majority of<br />

the farmers ranked the displacement of older<br />

varieties by new varieties as the number one<br />

reason (57.6%) for rejecting varieties while 12.6%<br />

regarded poor markets as the second most<br />

important reason for rejecting a variety (Table 9).<br />

Lack of seed was considered the second most<br />

important reason for rejecting a variety by 29.8 %<br />

of the farmers. The reasons for rejecting the<br />

varieties did not differ significantly between the<br />

divisions.<br />

Method of variety abandonment<br />

Majority of the farmers surveyed (97.3%)<br />

indicated that the principal method they used to<br />

discard a variety was to either sell or consume all<br />

the tubers of the variety to be discarded (Table<br />

10). A small proportion of the farmers (2.7%)<br />

indicated that they left the seeds of the variety to<br />

be discarded to deteriorate during storage, after<br />

which the material was thrown away.<br />

Perceived losses of cultivars and<br />

quantification of genetic erosion<br />

From an initial 29 varieties grown in 1989 in the<br />

study area, a total of 20 varieties were no longer<br />

grown by farmers as of the year 2006. Another 11<br />

varieties (Asante, Furaha, Karuse, Kenya Karibu,<br />

Kenya Mavuno, Kenya Sifa, Mugaruru, Ndera<br />

Mwana, Thima Thuti, Tigoni and Zangi) had been<br />

introduced in farmers’ fields bringing the total


Table 11. Reasons why farmers do not care about loss of varieties (percentage of respondents).<br />

Reason<br />

Better<br />

varieties<br />

came<br />

Poor<br />

markets<br />

Lack of<br />

seeds<br />

Rank<br />

1<br />

Limuru (n = 100)<br />

Rank<br />

2<br />

Ndeiya (n = 110)<br />

Tigoni (n = 92)<br />

Rank 3 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 1 Rank<br />

2<br />

Rank 3<br />

Lung'aho et al. 2709<br />

Rank<br />

1<br />

Total (n = 302)<br />

69.0 3.0 11.0 64.5 5.5 20.0 84.8 1.1 6.5 72.2 3.3 12.9<br />

8.0 27.0 45.0 2.7 43.6 43.6 0.0 35.9 58.7 3.6 35.8 48.7<br />

8.0 55.0 19.0 22.7 40.9 26.4 9.8 57.6 29.3 13.9 50.7 24.8<br />

Multiple responses possible; ranking scale 1-3, where 1-most important, 2-second most important and 3 is least important.<br />

number of cultivated varieties in the survey area in 2006<br />

to 20. All the varieties that were introduced after 1989<br />

were still being grown to some degree by farmers. Thus,<br />

the GI is 69.0% while the GE was 31.0%.<br />

Farmer’s perception of genetic erosion<br />

There were differences in farmers perceptions about loss<br />

of varieties across the three divisions (χ 2 = 4.773; d.f = 2;<br />

p = 0.092). A very high proportion of the farmers that<br />

surveyed (89.7%) were not bothered by the loss of<br />

varieties. Majority of the farmers ranked the appearance<br />

of higher yielding varieties (72.2%) followed by the<br />

preference of newer varieties by the market (13.9%) as<br />

the most important reasons for not caring about the<br />

disappearance of the varieties (χχ 2 = 25.940; d.f = 6; p =<br />

0.001) (Table 11). Lack of seeds was ranked third (3.6<br />

%).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

This study found potato farmers to be ageing lot with<br />

most of them aged over 50 years. The implication of this<br />

finding is that the ageing farmers participated prominently<br />

in potato farming production in the study area, while a<br />

large proportion of the young and able bodied men might<br />

have migrated to the urban centers in search of more<br />

lucrative jobs. This is a negative influence not only on<br />

conservation of potato varieties but also on the<br />

sustainability of potato farming with potentially negative<br />

effects on food security situation of Kenya. It is important<br />

that the youths are encouraged to take up potato farming<br />

through appropriate incentives and policy measures.<br />

Most studies have pointed out that yield is the most<br />

important criterion for the choice of a variety by a farmer<br />

(Heisey and Brennan, 1991). When the yields of a<br />

particular variety decline because of degeneration,<br />

farmers needed to replenish their seed stocks to restore<br />

the yields (Lung’aho et al., 2007). In the absence of<br />

Rank<br />

2<br />

Rank<br />

3<br />

sources of good quality seed, farmers may prefer to<br />

change a variety and plant a different variety that has<br />

high yields rather than a variety that is considered good<br />

but low yielding due to diseases. Thus, varietal<br />

composition in the informal seed system is dynamic. Over<br />

time, varieties are lost and new ones are introduced from<br />

elsewhere (Louette et al., 1997). Commonly, improved<br />

varieties are incorporated into the informal system<br />

(Almekinders et al., 1994), a process that is known as<br />

creolization (Bellon and Risopoulos, 2001). These<br />

creolized varieties are often given local names, becoming<br />

part of what farmers consider to be their local varieties.<br />

Majority of farmers in this study sourced their seed from<br />

informal seed sources. Studies from elsewhere<br />

(Cromwell, 1990; Ndjeunga et al., 2000) reported farmerto-farmer<br />

seed exchange to be an effective means of<br />

exchanging seed and a means of diffusing new varieties<br />

to small holder farmers. Farmer seed systems should<br />

therefore be strengthened so that they can provide local<br />

farmers with seeds of varieties that they require.<br />

Sustainable seed supply amongst farmers can be<br />

achieved by supporting local seed networks, injection of<br />

clean seeds and capacity building.<br />

Other than varieties officially named by the Kenyan<br />

potato programme or those introduced into the country<br />

with distinct names, many of the other names of varieties<br />

known in the survey area are derived from the local<br />

dialect - Kikuyu. Examples include Ndera Mwana,<br />

Kibururu, Gituru, Karora Iguru, Kiraya, Kihoro, Thima<br />

Thuti and Mukori.<br />

Both the factors related to variety and non-varietal<br />

characteristics influenced the degree to which varieties<br />

were replaced or abandoned by farmers. The cultivar<br />

characteristics included susceptibility to diseases and<br />

pests, agronomic performance and postharvest attributes<br />

while non-varietal characteristics that influenced<br />

abandonment of varieties by farmers included lack of<br />

seed, appearance of newer or better varieties and poor<br />

market for the older varieties. Results of this study<br />

showed that farmers have a logical preference for<br />

cultivars that produce higher yields and explains why


2710 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Zangi, Tigoni and Thima Thuti and Karuse were most<br />

commonly grown varieties. Similar observations were<br />

made by Crissman (1989). The fact that many farmers<br />

would not grow the varieties that have disappeared even<br />

if good quality seed was offered to them suggests that<br />

farmers attach little value to lost varieties. This<br />

observation has serious implications on the conservation<br />

of local potato germplasm and calls for deliberate efforts<br />

to conserve germplasm that is in danger of getting lost.<br />

The findings of our study are in agreement with those<br />

of FAO (1988) who reported that the main cause of GE in<br />

crops, as reported by most countries, was the<br />

replacement of farmer varieties by improved varieties.<br />

The results however, differ from those of Mekbib (2007)<br />

who reported that for sorghum, the most important<br />

reasons for variety loss were reduced benefit from the<br />

abandoned varieties, drought, reduced land size and<br />

introduction of other food crops. With respect to GE, our<br />

results are different from those of Mekbib (2007) who<br />

found that there was no genetic erosion of sorghum in the<br />

centre of diversity in Ethiopia and those of Hermadez<br />

(1993) who disproved GE of maize in Mexico in the<br />

centre of diversity.<br />

As has been previously pointed out (Quiros et al., 1990;<br />

Rao et al., 2002), the use of variety names to represent<br />

genetic diversity requires some precaution. It is possible<br />

that the same cultivar might be known by different names<br />

in different localities. Conversely, cultivars with different<br />

morphological and physiological characteristics might be<br />

called by the same name. The former type is commonly<br />

encountered when dealing with different ethnic groups<br />

(Tsegaye, 1991). The latter type of misclassification can<br />

arise when farmers use only one trait (for example, tuber<br />

skin colour) to distinguish between local varieties and<br />

disregard the other differences. Folk taxonomy exercised<br />

by traditional seed experts usually involves a hierarchy of<br />

classification criteria that combines various traits. For<br />

instance, Rao et al. (2002) identified three elements used<br />

in naming rice varieties (basic name, root name and a<br />

descriptor). Similarly, Tsehaye (2004) documented<br />

successive levels used by farmers to refine the<br />

classification of finger millet landraces (first inflorescence<br />

morphology, secondly, seed colour classes, then<br />

agronomic, and finally end-use characteristics).<br />

Farmers’ knowledge of their cultivars is reported to be<br />

fairly consistent. Teshome et al. (1997) examined<br />

sorghum landraces and confirmed that the landraces<br />

named by farmers were distinct plant populations, while<br />

Quiros et al. (1990) studied Andean potato varieties and<br />

found a high level of agreement between folk variety<br />

names and genetic distinctness identified by molecular<br />

markers. Similarly, diversity studies using DNA in taro<br />

cultivars (Caillon et al., 2004) revealed that each cultivar<br />

named by farmers corresponded to a separate genotype.<br />

Work by Lung’aho et al. (2011) which analyzed some of<br />

the potato cultivars mentioned in the present study<br />

demonstrated that the cultivars studied were indeed<br />

distinct from each other.<br />

Data on the loss of varieties may provide a good<br />

indicator of loss diversity particularly, if accompanied by<br />

data on genetic distances. Diversity could even increase<br />

if newer or improved varieties are genetically more<br />

heterogeneous than older varieties or if they offer traits<br />

that are not present in older varieties (Wood and Lenne,<br />

1997; Louette and Smale, 2000). Under such<br />

circumstances, the disappearance of named varieties<br />

may not be sufficient proof that loss of diversity has<br />

occurred.<br />

The nature of the informal seed system makes the<br />

designation of discrete entities somewhat difficult<br />

(Cromwell, 1990; Almekinders et al., 1994; Louette et al.,<br />

1997) and local names may not necessarily reflect the<br />

genetic history of crops. Different names may be given to<br />

identical varieties and conversely, a single name may<br />

apply to heterogeneous material (Crissman, 1989; Jarvis<br />

et al., 2008). In such cases, DNA-marker techniques<br />

have provided tools for directly measuring genetic<br />

diversity hence, testing for occurrence of genetic erosion<br />

(Almanza-Pinzon et al., 2003).<br />

Although, viruses will not usually kill the crop, their<br />

presence can result in reduced yields (Lung’aho et al.,<br />

2007) and the abandonment of the affected variety by<br />

farmers. Assessment of virus infection, cleaning of<br />

infected cultivars and providing local farmers with clean<br />

seed has been suggested as one way of maintaining<br />

potato diversity among growers (Clausen et al., 2005). It<br />

is however, doubtful if these systems would work with<br />

commercially oriented farmers since most of the farmers<br />

interviewed indicated that they would not grow such<br />

varieties as it would be difficult to market them and some<br />

may not be as high yielding as newer varieties. However,<br />

this may be an option for farmers practicing subsistence<br />

potato production.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Results of this study showed that loss of varieties has<br />

occurred with 20 of the 40 varieties encountered in this<br />

study being most affected by genetic erosion. The main<br />

reason for abandoning varieties was a decline in utility<br />

derived from a variety, with low yields and susceptibility<br />

to a host of biotic and abiotic stresses being rated as the<br />

most important reasons for abandoning a variety. The<br />

study also revealed that farmers were not concerned<br />

about loss of varieties. This may mean that they are<br />

unaware of the dangers of losing varieties or that they are<br />

aware but do not consider the threat to be significant.<br />

There is, therefore, the need for awareness creation on<br />

the importance of potato genetic resources and their<br />

conservation. There is also an urgent need to collect and<br />

preserve existing varieties as a reduction in their number<br />

has already taken place and it is only a matter of time<br />

before more varieties are lost.


ACKNOWLEGEMENTS<br />

The authors are grateful to agricultural extension<br />

personnel who assisted during the field survey. The<br />

cooperation of farmers in the study area is highly<br />

appreciated. The valuable comments on the earlier<br />

version of the manuscript by an anonymous reviewer are<br />

appreciated. This study was financed by the Kenya<br />

Agricultural Productivity Project (KAPP).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Almanza-Pinzon MI, Khairallah M, Fox PN, Warburton ML (2003).<br />

Comparison of molecular markers and coefficients of parentage for<br />

the analysis of genetic diversity among spring bread wheat<br />

accessions. Euphytica, 130: 77-86.<br />

Almekinders CJM, Louwaars NP, Bruijn GHD (1994). Local seed<br />

systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in<br />

developing countries. Euphytica, 78: 207–216.<br />

Bellon MR, Risopoulos J (2001). Small-scale farmers expand the<br />

benefits of improved maize germplasm: a case study from Chiapas,<br />

Mexico. World Dev., 29: 799–811.<br />

Bennett E (1973). Wheats of the Mediterranean basin. In: Frankel OH<br />

(ed.) Survey of Crop Genetic Resources in Their Centre of Diversity.<br />

First Report: FAO – IBP, pp. 1–8.<br />

Brown AHD (2008). Indicators of genetic diversity, genetic erosion, and<br />

genetic variability for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture.<br />

Thematic background study. Available at:<br />

www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1500e/i1500e20.pdf<br />

Brush SB (1999). Genetic erosion of crop populations in centers of<br />

diversity: a revision. In: Proceedings of the technical meeting on the<br />

methodology of the FAO world information and early warning system<br />

on plant genetic resources held at the Research Institute of Crop<br />

Production, Prague, Czech Republic, 21–23 June 1999.<br />

http://apps3.fao.org/wiews/Prague/Paper5.jsp.<br />

Caillon S, Quero-Garcia J, Guarrino L (2004) Taro in Vanutu: towards a<br />

dynamic conservation strategy. In: LEISA, Magazine for low external<br />

input and sustainable agriculture, 20: 18–20.<br />

CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). (2002). Global strategy for<br />

plant conservation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.<br />

Clausen AM, Colavita M, Butzonitch I, Carranza AV (2005). Potato<br />

collecting expedition in the province of Jujuy, Argentina and disease<br />

indexing of virus and fungus pathogens in Andean cultivars. Genet.<br />

Resour. Crop Evol., 52 (8):1099-1109.<br />

Crissman LM (1989). Evaluation, Choice and use of potato varieites in<br />

Kenya. Social Science Department, Working paper 1989-1.<br />

International Potato Centre. Lima. Peru pp 44.<br />

Cromwell EA (1990). Seed diffusion mechanisms in small farmer<br />

communities. Lessons from Asia, Africa and Latin America. Network<br />

Paper Agricultural Administration Research and Extension Network<br />

(21) Overseas Development Administration, London, UK 57 pp.<br />

Durr G, Lorenzl G (1980). Potato production and utilization in Kenya.<br />

(Lima: Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi.<br />

Institute of socio-economics of Agricultural Development, Technical<br />

University of Berlin CIP), 133 pp.<br />

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), (1998). The State of the<br />

World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome,<br />

Italy.<br />

Frankel OH, Bennett E (1970). Genetic resources in plants—their<br />

exploration and conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications,<br />

Oxford.<br />

Gepts P (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the<br />

accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop<br />

Sci. 46: 2278–2292.<br />

Guarino L (1999). Approaches to measuring genetic erosion. In:<br />

Proceedings of technical meeting on the methodology of the world<br />

information and early warning system on plant genetic resources.<br />

Lung'aho et al. 2711<br />

FAO, Rome. Available from<br />

ww.apps3.fao.org/views/prague/technical.<br />

Hammer K, Knupper H, Xhuveli L, Perrino P (1996). Estimating genetic<br />

erosion in landraces – two case studies. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.,<br />

43(4): 329-336.<br />

Harlan JR (1975). Our vanishing genetic resources. Science, 188: 618–<br />

621.<br />

Hawkes JG (1983). The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University<br />

Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />

Hawkes JG, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV (2000). The ex situ conservation<br />

of plant genetic resources. Kluwer, <strong>Academic</strong> Publishers -Dordrecht<br />

Netherlands p. 250.<br />

Hermadez XE (1993). Genetic resources of primitive varieties of<br />

Mesoamerica, Zea spp., Phaseolus spp., Capsicum spp., Cucurbita<br />

spp. In: Frankel OH (ed). Survey of crop genetic resources in their<br />

centres of diversity, first report. Food and Agricultural Organization of<br />

the UN., Rome pp. 76-86.<br />

Heisey PW, Brennan J (1991). An analytical model of farmers demand<br />

for replacement of seed. American J. Agric. Econom., 73: 44-52.<br />

Jarvis DI, Brown AHD, Cuong PH, Collado-Panduro L, Latournerie-<br />

Moreno L, Gyawali S, Tanto T, Sawadogo M, Mar I, Sadiki, M., Hue,<br />

N.T.N., Arias-Reyes, L., Balma, D., Bajracharya, J., Castillo, F., Rijal,<br />

D., Belqadi, L., Rana, R., Saidi S, Ouedraogo J, Zangre R, Rhrib K,<br />

Chavez JL, Schoen D, Sthapit B, De Santis P, Fadda C, Hodgkin T<br />

(2008). A global perspective of the richness and evenness of<br />

traditional crop-variety diversity maintained by farming communities.<br />

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(14):<br />

5326–533.<br />

Louette D, Charrier A, Berthaud J (1997). In situ conservation of maize<br />

in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a<br />

traditional community. Econom. Bot., 51: 20–38.<br />

Louette D, Smale M (2000). Farmers’ seed selection practices and<br />

traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica 113: 25–<br />

41.<br />

Lung’aho C, Chemining’wa GN ,Fu Y, Shibairo SI, Hutchinson MJ,<br />

Paniagua HG (2011). Genetic Diversity of Kenyan Potato Germplasm<br />

Revealed by Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. Amer. J. Potato<br />

Res., 88(5): 424-434, DOI: 10.1007/s12230-011-9208-1.<br />

Lung’aho C, Lemaga B, Nyongesa M, Gildermacher P, Kinyae P, Demo<br />

P, Kabira JN (2007). Commercial seed potato production in eastern<br />

and central Africa. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute.<br />

Mekbib F (2007). Genetic erosion of sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L.)<br />

Moench) in the centre of diversity, Ethiopia. Genet. Resour. Crop<br />

Evol., DOI 10.1007/s10722-007-9240-7.<br />

Ndjeunga J, Anand Kumar K, Ntare BR (2000). Comparative analysis of<br />

seed systems in Niger and Senegal. Working paper series No.3.<br />

Patancheru 502 324, Andra Pradesh, India: International Crops<br />

Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics 40 pp.<br />

Quiros CF, Brush SB, Douches DS, Zimmerer KS, Huestis G (1990)<br />

Biochemical and folk assessment of variability of Andean cultivated<br />

potatoes. Econom. Bot., 44: 254–266.<br />

Rao SA, Bounphanousay C, Schiller JM, Alcantara AB, Jackson MT<br />

(2002) Naming of traditional rice varieties by farmers in the Lao<br />

P.D.R. Genetic Resourses ans Crop Evolution 49:83–88Steel, D.G.R,<br />

Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D.A. (1997). Principles and Procedures of<br />

Statistics. A Biometrical Approach- 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill Co. New<br />

York.<br />

Teklu Y, Hammer K (2006). Farmers’ perception and genetic erosion of<br />

tetraploid wheat landraces in Ethiopia. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.,<br />

53: 1099-1113.<br />

Tsegaye R, Berg T (2007). Genetic erosion of Ethipian tetraploid wheat<br />

landraces in Eastern Shewa Central Ethiopia. Genet. Resour. Crop<br />

Evol., 54: 715-726.<br />

Tsegaye B (1991) Community management of crop genetic resources<br />

in the enset-complex farming systems of southern Ethiopia: a case<br />

study from Sidamo region. MSc thesis, Agricultural University of<br />

Norway, Aas, Norway.<br />

Tunstall V, Teshome A, Torrance JK (2001) Distribution, abundance<br />

and risk of loss of sorghum landraces in four communities in North<br />

Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 48:<br />

131–142.<br />

van de Wouw M, Kirk C, van Hintum T, van Treuren R, Visser B (2009).


2712 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges.<br />

Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and utilization 1-15<br />

doi:10.1017/ S1479262109990062.<br />

Vellve R (1993). The decline of diversity in European Agriculture.<br />

Ecologist 23:64-69.<br />

Willemen L, Scheldeman X, Cabellos VS, Salazar SR, Guarino L<br />

(2007). Spatial patterns of diversity and genetic erosion of traditional<br />

cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in the Peruvian Amazon: An<br />

evaluation of socio-economic and environmental indicators. Genet.<br />

Resour. Crop Evol., 54: 1599-1612.<br />

Wood D, Lenne JM (1997). The conservation of agrobiodiversity onfarm:<br />

questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodivers. Conserv., 6:<br />

109–129.<br />

Zeven AC (2002) Traditional maintenance breeding of landraces: 2<br />

practical and theoretical considerations on maintenance of variations<br />

of landraces by farmers and gardeners. Euphytica, 123: 147–158.


African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(17), pp. 2713-2719, 5 May, 2012<br />

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR<br />

DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.2255<br />

ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

Full Length Research Paper<br />

Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on maize<br />

hybrids under agro-environmental conditions of<br />

Faisalabad-Pakistan<br />

Wajid NASIM 1,2 *, Ashfaq AHMAD 3 , Tasneem KHALIQ 3 , Aftab WAJID 3 , Muhammad Farooq<br />

Hussain MUNIS 1 , Hassan Javaid CHAUDHRY 1 , Muhammad Mudassar Maqbool 4 Shakeel<br />

AHMAD 5 and Hafiz Mohkum HAMMAD 3<br />

1 Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad-45320, Pakistan.<br />

2 Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, (CIIT), Vehari -61100, Pakistan.<br />

3 Agro-Climatology Laboratory, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan.<br />

4 College of Agriculture, Dera Ghazi Khan, sub-campus, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan,<br />

5 Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan-60800, Pakistan.<br />

Accepted 27 March, 2012<br />

Organic agriculture combines tradition, innovation and science to benefit the shared environment and<br />

promote fair relationships and a good quality of life for all involved. Furthermore, maize (Zea mays L.)<br />

crop is the 3 rd cereal crop of Pakistan after wheat and rice. According to the economic survey of<br />

Pakistan, it is cultivated on the area of approximately, 1.11 million hectare and production from this<br />

area was 4.04 million tone s. A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Re search Area, University<br />

of Agriculture, Faisalabad-Pakistan to examine the effect of organic and inorganic fertilization on maize<br />

productivity. The experiment was laid out in Randomized <strong>Complete</strong> Block De sign (RCBD), with four<br />

replications. Two maize hybrids were used in this experiment. The results showed that maize yield and<br />

its component such a s cobs per plant, cob length, number of grains per cob, 1000 -grain weight were<br />

maximum when the plots were fertilized at 100 kg N ha -1 as urea + 100 kg N ha -1 as poultry manure.<br />

Further re search is desired to inve stigate maximum yield by using organic source of fertilizer than<br />

inorganic source of fertilizer to avoid lethal effects on human health created by inorganic fertilizers.<br />

Key words: Organic farming, maize productivity, inorganic fertilizer, semi-arid conditions, Pakistan.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Maize is one of the most widely distributed crops of the<br />

world (Kaul et al., 2011). This crop being the highest<br />

yielding cereal crop in the world is of significant<br />

importance for countries like Pakistan, where rapidly<br />

*Corresponding author. E-mail: wajidnaseem2001@gmail.com,<br />

wajidnasim@ciitvehari.edu.pk. Tel: +92-333-991-1881.<br />

Abbreviations: GOP, Government of Pakistan; RCBD,<br />

randomized complete block design; FYM, farm yard manure;<br />

NPK, nitrogen-phosphorus-potash; TSP, triple super<br />

phosphate; SOP, sulphate of potash; PM, poultry manure; PH,<br />

plant height; LAI, leaf area index; PP, plant population.<br />

increasing population has already out stripped the<br />

available food supplies. In Pakistan, maize is the third<br />

important cereal after wheat and rice (Bukhsh et al.,<br />

2011). It accounts for 4.8% of the total cropped area and<br />

3.5% of the value of agricultural output (Khaliq et al.,<br />

2011). Furthermore, it is grown on about 1118 thousand<br />

hectares with annual production of 4036 thousand tones<br />

of grain and average yield of 3598 kg ha -1 (GOP, 2010).<br />

Intensive cropping system requires highly fertilized soils<br />

and those soils should be maintained through integrated<br />

plant nutrient management system (Bationo and Koala,<br />

1998). Organic manure provides many advantages such<br />

as improves soil tilth, aeration, water holding capacity


2714 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

and stimulates micro-organisms in the soil that make<br />

plant nutrients readily available (Choudhary and Bailey,<br />

1994; Lal, 1997). The fertilization can affect enzymatic<br />

activities inside the soil profile (Yang et al., 2008; Zhu et<br />

al., 2008). Proper application of organic and inorganic<br />

fertilizers canincrease the activities of soil microorganisms<br />

and enzymes and soil available nutrient<br />

contents (He and Li, 2004; Saha et al., 2008). He and Li<br />

(2004) indicated that combined application of organic and<br />

inorganic fertilizers can increase the activities of soil<br />

invertase and available nutrient content. Furthermore, the<br />

application of organic manure mixed up with chemical<br />

fertilizer can prove to be an excellent procedure in<br />

maintaining and improving the soil fertility, and increasing<br />

fertilizer use efficiency. For this reason, it could be helpful<br />

to study the effect of application of organic manure<br />

combined with chemical fertilizer by using integrated<br />

nutrient management system, which has been the<br />

research focus all over the world (Reganold, 1995; Liu et<br />

al., 1996). In addition, application of organic manure<br />

could improve the soil quality and is more profitable in<br />

environment protection when compared with application<br />

of chemical fertilizer alone (Reganold, 1995). The soil<br />

with organic manure continually applied had lower bulk<br />

density and higher porosity values, porous and buffering<br />

capacities (Edmeades, 2003). The influence of different<br />

nutrients applied to soil on farmland ecosystem was<br />

different (Yang et al., 2004). Therefore, the present study<br />

was carried out to evaluate the effect of different corn<br />

hybrids under the integrated use of organic and inorganic<br />

fertilizers under the agro-climatic conditions of<br />

Faisalabad-Pakistan.<br />

MATERIALS AND M ETHODS<br />

Experimental site<br />

The experiment w as carried out at Agronomic Research Area,<br />

University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (31.26°N, Longitude 73.06°E<br />

and Altitude 184 m), and Pakistan during the autumn season of<br />

2008. Faisalabad shows the semi-arid environmental conditions<br />

Nas im et al. (2011).<br />

Experimental design and treatments<br />

The experiment w as laid out in randomized complete block design<br />

(RCBD) w ith split plot arrangement hav ing three replications<br />

keeping net plot size as 7.0 × 3.8 m. Tw o maize hybrids (H1 =<br />

Pioneer-3062, H2 = Pioneer-3061) w ith best qualities (sow n in may<br />

till mid July, takes 90 to 100 days for maturity, cobs are long w ith<br />

full size of grains resistant to diseases and finally bear the capacity<br />

of drought tolerance (Ali et al., 2004; Salah et al., 2011), w ere sow n<br />

in main plots and different fertilizer levels (F1 = control, F2 = w hole N<br />

as urea, F3 = w hole N as farmyard manure (35.31 t ha -1 ), F4 = w hole<br />

N as poultry manure (P.M) (12.98 t ha -1 ), F5 = half N as FY M (19.01<br />

t ha -1 ) + 100 kg N ha -1 as urea, F6 = half N as P. M. (7.01 t ha -1 ) +<br />

100 kg N ha -1 as urea) w ere kept in the sub plots. Whole N<br />

indicated 200 kg N ha -1 w hile half N show s 200 kg N ha -1 in the<br />

fertilizer treatments.<br />

Crop management strategy<br />

The crop w as sow n on 29 th of July, 2008 (Figure 1) manually w ith<br />

the help of dibbler keeping recommended distance of ridges and<br />

plants (P × P = 20 c m, R × R = 70 c m) w ith seed rate of 25 kg ha -1 .<br />

A recommended fertilizer amount of NPK (200: 100: 75, kg ha -1 )<br />

was applied. The sources of fertilizer w ere urea, TSP, SOP, FY M<br />

and PM used and amounts of P and K w ere adjusted w ith TSP and<br />

SOP including quantity of P and K received by FY M and PM. The<br />

fertilizers w ere used in such a w ay that half the amount of N from<br />

urea and full amount of P, K, FY M and PM w ere applied at the time<br />

of sow ing, w hile the remaining half amount of the urea w as applied<br />

w ith second irrigation according to the treatments. All the cultural<br />

practices (hoeing, w eed management, irrigation and plant<br />

protection measures etc) w ere kept normal for the crop.<br />

Final harvest data<br />

The crop w as harvested w hen it completed its physiological<br />

maturity at (2 nd November, 2008). The parameters that w ere<br />

recorded during the course of study included days taken to 50%<br />

tasseling and silking, leaf area index (LAI) at tasseling, total dry<br />

matter (g m -2 ) at tasseling, plant population (m -2 ), number of grains<br />

(m -2 ), mean grain w eight (g), grain yield (kg ha -1 ) and harvest index<br />

(%).<br />

Total number of plants per plot w as counted at final harvest from<br />

an area of 1 m 2 , the number of grains w as counted from randomly<br />

selected sample of ten cobs plot -1 and then average number of<br />

grains (m -2 ) w as calculated. Furthermore, after threshing of crop,<br />

thousand grains w ere taken from each plot and w eighed, as w ell<br />

as, total grain w eight w as recorded from each plot and finally, grain<br />

yield (on hectare basis) w as calculated, respectively. As the harvest<br />

index (%) w as measured as it is the ratio of economic yield to the<br />

biological yield in percentage. In addition, quality parameters (grain<br />

oil and protein contents) w ere also observed at the final harvest<br />

(Nasim et al., 2012).<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The data collected during the season w ere statistically analyzed by<br />

using the computer statistical program MSTA T-C. Analysis of<br />

variance technique w as employed to test the overall significance of<br />

the data, w hile the least significance difference (LSD) test at P =<br />

0.05 w as used to compare the differences among treatment means<br />

(Steel et al., 1997).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Soil, growing media and environmental conditions<br />

The chemical analysis of experimental site was carried<br />

out prior to sowing of the crop. All the characteristics of<br />

experimental soil such as soil texture, structure and soil<br />

pH etc and other parameters are shown in Table 1.<br />

The analysis of FYM and PM were carried out (Table<br />

2). The detailed weather conditions (minimum and<br />

maximum temperature, solar radiation and precipitation)<br />

are explained in Figures 1 and 2 that were observed<br />

during the crop cycle.<br />

50% ta sseling and silking (days)<br />

Data (Table 3) showed that maize hybrids had non-


Precipitation (mm)<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Table 1. The chemical analysis of experimental location under agroclimatic<br />

conditions of Faisalabad- Pakistan.<br />

Characteristics Unit Value<br />

Soil texture Silty clay loam<br />

Organic matter % 1.21<br />

Total nitrogen % 0.06<br />

Phosphorus (available) ppm 0.99<br />

Potassium (available) ppm 178<br />

Soil pH - 7.6<br />

Soil EC dS m -1 1.5<br />

Table 2. The chemical analysis of organic manures under agro-climatic conditions<br />

of Faisalabad-Pakistan.<br />

Characteristics Unit<br />

*FYM<br />

Values<br />

**PM<br />

Dry matter % 19.99 47.0<br />

Moisture % 78.00 51.0<br />

Nitrogen % 0.57 1.51<br />

Phosphorus % 0.26 0.78<br />

Potassium % 0.63 0.37<br />

*Farm yard manure, **poultry manure.<br />

Precipitation (mm)<br />

Solar Radiation (MJ/m 2 /d)<br />

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />

Month<br />

a) 2008<br />

b) Mean (20 years)<br />

Jan Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan<br />

Month<br />

Figure 1. Mean monthly solar radiation and precipitation under agro-environmental conditions of Faisalabad Pakistan<br />

(2008 and mean of 20 years).<br />

significant effect on days taken to 50% tasseling on an<br />

average that this period extended from 48.26 to 52.95<br />

days. The organic and inorganic fertilizers that were<br />

applied to maize significantly affected the duration of<br />

tasseling. The assessment of individual treatment means<br />

indicated that maximum number of days to tasseling<br />

(52.95) was taken where maize crop was fertilized with<br />

Nasim et al. 2715<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Solar Radiation (MJ/m 2 /d)<br />

100 kg N ha -1 as poultry manure + 100 kg N ha -1 as urea<br />

(F6) but statistically at par with other treatments except<br />

control (F1). The period of silking was delayed in Pioneer-<br />

3061 as compared to Pioneer-3060. Furthermore,<br />

fertilizer application affected days taken to 50% silking as<br />

it was observed in tasseling. Maximum number of days to<br />

50% silking (56.55) was noted in plots where maize crop


Temperature (°C)<br />

2716 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Temperature ( o C)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Average maximum temperature<br />

Average minimum temperature<br />

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />

a) 2008 b) Mean (20 years)<br />

Month<br />

Average maximum temperature<br />

Average minimum temperature<br />

Jan Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan<br />

Month<br />

Figure 2. Mean monthly temperature (minimum & maximum) under agro-environmental conditions of Faisalabad-Pakistan<br />

(2008 and mean of 20 years).<br />

Table 3.The effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on phenology and grow th of maize hybr ids under agroclimatic<br />

conditions of Faisalabad-Pakistan.<br />

Treatment<br />

(A) Hybrids<br />

50% tasseling<br />

(days)<br />

50% silking<br />

(days)<br />

Plant<br />

height (cm)<br />

LAI (at<br />

tasseling)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

Temperature ( o C)<br />

Total dry matter (at<br />

tasseling)(g/m 2 )<br />

H1 49.63 56.55 a 197.01 a 4.87 1759.27<br />

H2 52.36 52.21 b 190.18 b 4.79 1726.26<br />

Significance NS * * NS NS<br />

(B) Fertilizers<br />

F1 48.26 b 51.59 b 169.58 d 3.95 d 1169.26 d<br />

F2 50.21 a 54.26 a 17.7.39 bc 4.62 c 1999.43 a<br />

F3 51.15 a 54.75 a 190.72 c 4.72 bc 1770.29 c<br />

F4 51.76 a 54.99 a 194.99 b 4.76 abc 1812.86 b<br />

F5 51.99 a 55.12 a 196.78 b 4.74 ab 1825.86 b<br />

F6 52.95 a 56.10 a 207.45 a 4.89 a 1870.96 ab<br />

Significance NS * * * *<br />

A x B NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Mean 51.94 53.07 190.29 4.26 237.26<br />

Means sharing at 5% level (P) same letter did not differ significantly; *= Significant; NS = Non-significant.<br />

was fertilized at the rate of 100 kg N ha -1 as poultry<br />

manure + 100 kg N ha -1 as urea. All other treatments<br />

were statistically at par with each other.<br />

Plant height (cm)<br />

Pioneer-3062 showed significantly more pH (197.01 cm)<br />

than Pioneer-3061 (190.18 cm). Both the organic and<br />

inorganic fertilizers affected pH significantly, the<br />

maximum (207.45 cm) height plant was found in F6<br />

treatment (plot fertilized with mixture of 100 kg N ha -1 as<br />

urea + 100 kg N ha -1 as poultry manure) followed by F5<br />

(100 kg N ha -1 as urea + 100 kg N ha -1 as FYM) which<br />

was statistically at par with F2 treatment (200 kg N ha -1<br />

as urea) as well as, F4 (200 kg N ha -1 as poultry manure).<br />

Minimum pH was recorded in F1 treatment (no fertilizer<br />

and manure was applied (Table 3). These results also<br />

confirmed the findings carried out by Borin and Sartori<br />

(1989); Thomassims et al. (1995) and Tamayo et al. (1997).


The increase in pH in the treatment (½ urea + ½ poultry<br />

manure) was observed as nitrogen was available from<br />

both urea as well as PM so it enhanced the growth of<br />

plants.<br />

Leaf area index at tasseling<br />

Non significant differences in LAI between two maize<br />

hybrids were found, while fertilizer treatments had<br />

significant differences and maximum LAI at tasseling<br />

(4.89) was observed in F6 (fertilized with a combination<br />

of 100 kg N ha -1 as urea + 100 kg N ha -1 as PM) followed<br />

by F5 (100 kg N ha -1 as urea + 100 kg N ha -1 as FYM)<br />

that was statistically at par with treatments F2 (200 kg N<br />

ha -1 as urea) and F4 (200 kg N ha -1 as PM). The<br />

minimum LAI was produced by the crop in control plots<br />

where no fertilizer was applied (Table 3).<br />

Total dry matter at tasseling<br />

The maize hybrids did not affect by total dry matter<br />

(TDM), when the crop was at tasseling stage (Table 3).<br />

The maximum TDM at tasseling (1999 gm -2 ) was<br />

observed by F2 (200 kg N ha -1 was applied as urea)<br />

which was statistically at par with F6 (combination of 100<br />

kg N ha -1 as urea + 100 kg N ha -1 as PM) where fertilizer<br />

was (1871 g m-2) as shown in the Table 4. Similar<br />

findings were also observed from the studies carried out<br />

by He and Li (2004) and Saha et al. (2008). Variations in<br />

grain number might be due to differences in genetic<br />

potential of maize hybrids.<br />

The findings also confirmed the results reported by<br />

Chaudhary et al. (1998); Sharma and Gupta (1998) and<br />

Younas et al. (2002). The levels of organic and inorganic<br />

fertilizers significantly influenced the number of grains<br />

(m -2 ). The treatment F6 (100 kg N ha -1 as urea + 100 kg N<br />

ha -1 as PM) produced more number (3301) of grains m -2<br />

than F4 (200 kg N ha -1 as PM) which produced 3012<br />

grains m -2 but it (F6) was not statistically different from<br />

plot fertilized with 200 kg N ha -1 as FYM (F5), while<br />

minimum number of grains was recorded from plots<br />

where no fertilizer and manure was applied, that is,<br />

control plots (Table 4).<br />

Mean grain weight (g)<br />

It is considered that grain weight contribute significant<br />

impacts on final yield of a crop. It is clear from Table 4<br />

that the corn hybrids, Pioneer-3062 and Pioneer-3061<br />

differed significantly from each other. Pioneer-3062<br />

produced more mean grain weight (0.451 g) than<br />

Pioneer-3061 (0.254 g).<br />

These results also corroborates the findings of Younas<br />

et al. (2002) who also observed that genetic potential had<br />

significant effect on mean grain weight. The maximum<br />

Nasim et al. 2717<br />

mean grain weight (0.299 g) was observed from F6 that<br />

was statistically similar to F2, F5 and F4 which produced<br />

0.282, 0.279 and 0.281 g, respectively (Table 4). While<br />

minimum mean grain weight (0.236 g) was obtained from<br />

control plot (F1). These findings are in line with the results<br />

of Rutunga et al. (1998); Sevaram et al. (1998) and Ma et<br />

al. (1999). Furthermore, the increase in mean grain<br />

weight was mainly due to reasonable sufficient supply of<br />

nutrients from both urea and PM throughout the duration<br />

of grain filling and development.<br />

Grain yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

Grain yield is the main output for which the crop was<br />

sown. Grain yield differed significantly among different<br />

maize hybrids; Pioneer-3062 produced more grain yield<br />

(5612 kg ha -1 ) than Pioneer-3061 (5325 kg ha -1 ). The<br />

findings also have the similar approaches with the results<br />

explained by Ma et al. (1999) and Younas et al. (2002),<br />

who also observed that genetic potential had significant<br />

effect on mean grain weight and finally, grain yield. The<br />

treatment F6 produced maximum grain yield (6058 kg ha -<br />

1 ) which was statistically at par with F2 (Table 4). F5 also<br />

produced statistically similar yield as that of F2 (Table 4).<br />

Whereas, control (F1) plot gave minimum yield (4340 kg<br />

ha -1 ). The increase in grain yield in the treatments was<br />

mainly due to maximum number of grains per cob as well<br />

as, number of cobs per plant. This result is also in line<br />

with the findings carried out by Tamayo et al. (1997).<br />

They observed that combined use of mineral and<br />

organic manure gave maximum yield.<br />

Harve st index (%)<br />

Harvest index is the ratio of economic yield to biological<br />

yield represented in percent. The data presented in Table<br />

4 showed that the corn hybrids differed significantly from<br />

each other in their harvest index. Pioneer-3062 gave<br />

more harvest index (23.01%) than Pioneer-3061<br />

(21.87%).<br />

Furthermore, various levels of organic and inorganic<br />

fertilizers had significant effect on harvest index. The<br />

comparison of treatment means showed that maximum<br />

harvest index (27.09%) was recorded from F6.<br />

Treatments F2 and F5 have almost the same trend with<br />

each other as regards harvest index. Moreover, F3 and F4<br />

were also statistically at par with each other.<br />

The lowest harvest index (17.72%) was recorded in<br />

control treatment as shown in Table 4. Results also<br />

corroborate with Shah and Arif (2001) who also noted the<br />

positive effects of fertilizers (organic and inorganic)<br />

combined with each other.<br />

Grain protein and oil content (%)<br />

Grain protein and oil content of the maize hybrids were


2718 Afr. J. Agric. Res.<br />

Table 4. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and yield components of maize hybrids under agro-climatic conditions of Faisalabad-<br />

Pakistan.<br />

Treatments<br />

(A) Hybrids<br />

Plant<br />

population (m 2 )<br />

Number of<br />

grains (m 2 )<br />

Mean grain<br />

weight (g)<br />

Grain yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Harvest<br />

index (%)<br />

Grain protein<br />

content (%)<br />

Grain oil<br />

content (%)<br />

H1 6.79 3201 a 0.451 a 5612 a 23.01 a 10.02 4.12<br />

H2 6.67 3129 b 0.254 b 5325 b 21.87 b 9.81 4.05<br />

Significance NS * * * * NS NS<br />

(B) Fertilizers<br />

F1 6.22 2499 d 0.236 b 4340 d 17.72 d 9.01 d 4.02 b<br />

F2 6.60 3243 a 0.282 a 5867 ab 24.26 b 11.09 b 7.97 a<br />

F3 6.65 2855 c 0.260 b 5201 c 18.99 c 9.29 c 3.95 b<br />

F4 6.68 3012 b 0.281 a 5354 c 22.26 c 9.95 c 3.99 b<br />

F5 6.71 3126 ab 0.279 a 5720 b 24.35 d 11.16 b 4.95 a<br />

F6 6.69 3301 a 0.299 a 6058 a 27.09 a 12.01 a 4.92 a<br />

Significance NS * * * * * *<br />

Interaction (A x B) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Mean 6.82 3015 0.289 5404 21.99 8.99 4.93<br />

Means sharing at 5 % level (P) same letter did not differ significantly; *= Significant, NS = Non-significant.<br />

also determined. The quality of the crop is reliant on the<br />

existence of protein and oil in its seeds/grains. The maize<br />

hybrids showed non-significant differences for quality<br />

parameters. As in yield and yield component paramete rs,<br />

the F6 treatment gave maximum (12.01%) protein content<br />

but the highest oil content was observed in the F5<br />

treatment, and this was statistically at par with F6 and F2<br />

treatments (Table 4). Similar results were also clarified by<br />

Rutunga et al. (1998); Sevaram et al. (1998) and Ma et<br />

al. (1999).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The hybrid Pioneer-3062 gave excellent results with<br />

respect to grain yield and yield components as well as,<br />

grain protein and oil contents than Pioneer-3061. As<br />

such, Pioneer-3062 is recommended to grow under agroclimatic<br />

of Faisalabad. Among different fertilizer<br />

treatments, maximum yield was observed in the case of<br />

F6 treatment (plots in which 100 kg N ha -1 as urea + 100<br />

kg N ha -1 as PM) gave outstanding results as compared<br />

to other treatments. Furthermore, from our results, it<br />

seems that use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in<br />

proper combination (50:50) received higher yields than<br />

the sole application of either of the fertilizer or manure<br />

particularly, in hybrid corn under agro-climatic conditions<br />

of Faisalabad (Semi arid environment), Pakistan.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

The authors are grateful to all the members of Agro-<br />

Climatology Laboratory, Department of Agronomy,<br />

University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-Pakistan, for their<br />

manual and spiritual support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Ali T, Anw ar S, WA S, Ahmad B (2004). Response of maize<br />

hybrids/cultivars to various levels of potassium and irrigation<br />

frequencies. J. Agron., 3(3): 201-207.<br />

Bationo A.FL, Koala S (1998). Research on nutrient flows and balances<br />

in West Africa: state-of -the-art. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 71: 19-35.<br />

Bukhsh MAHA, Ahmad R, Iqbal J, Hussain S, Rehman A, Ishaque M<br />

(2011). Potassium application reduces bareness in different maize<br />

hybrids under crowding stress conditions. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 48(1):<br />

41-48.<br />

Borin M, Sartori G (1989). Nitrogen fertilizer trials on maize (Zea mays<br />

L.). The effect of fertilizer rate, source and application date. Rivista di<br />

Agron., 23: 263-269.<br />

Chaudhary MA, Shafiq M, Rehman AU (1998). Effect of organic and<br />

inorganic fertilizer on maize crop response under eroded loess soil.<br />

Pak. J. Soil Sci., 15: 39-43.<br />

Choudhary MLD, Bailey GCA (1994). Agriculture and agri- Food<br />

Canada, Brandon Research centre, R.R. # 3, Brandon, P.O. Box<br />

1000 A, R7A 5Y3, Manitoba, Canada.<br />

Edmeades DC (2003). The long-term effects of manures and fertilizers<br />

on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nut. Cyc. Agroecosys., 66:<br />

165-180.GOP (2010). Economic Survey of Pakistan (2009-10).<br />

Ministry of Finance, Islamabad, Pakistan.<br />

He Y. Li R (2004). Effect of the organo–inorgano-mixed fertilizer<br />

application on sugarcane yield and soil enzymatic activity. Sugar<br />

Crops China, 4: 36-38.<br />

Kaul J, kumar RS, Dass S (2011). Varietal improvement in maize:<br />

development of single cross hybrids in India. National press<br />

(http://krishisewa.com/articles/2011/vimaize.html).<br />

Khaliq T, Mahmood T, Kamal J, Masood A (2011). Effectiveness of<br />

farmyard manure, poultry manure and nitrogen for corn (Zea mays L.)<br />

productivity. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2: 260-263.<br />

Lal R (1997). Soil quality and sustainability. In: Lal, R., Blum WH,<br />

Valentin C, Stewart BA (Eds.), Methods for Assessment of Soil<br />

Degradation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 17-31.<br />

Liu XL, Gao Z, Liu CS, Si LZ (1996). Effect of combined application of


organic manure and fertilizers on crop yield and soil fertility in a<br />

located experiment. Acta P. Sinica, 33: 138-147.<br />

Ma BL, Lianne MD, Edward GG (1999). Soil nitrogen amendment<br />

effects on nitrogen uptake and grain yield of maize. Agron. J., 91:<br />

650-656.<br />

Nasim W, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Akhtar J, Muhammad D (2011). Nitrogen<br />

effects on growth and development of sunflower hybrids under agroclimatic<br />

conditions of Multan. Pak. J. Bot., 43(4): 2083-2092.<br />

Nasim W, Ahmad A, Bano A, Olatinwo R, Usman M, Khaliq T, Wajid A,<br />

Hammad HM, Mubeen M, Hussain M (2012). Effect of nitrogen on<br />

yield and oil quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids under<br />

sub humid conditions of Pakistan. Am. J. Plant Sci., 3(2): 243-251.<br />

Reganold JP (1995). Soil quality and profitability of biodynamic and<br />

conventional farming systems. Am. J. Agric., 10: 36-45.<br />

Rutunga V, Steiner KG, Karanja NK, Gachene CKK, Nzabonihankuye G<br />

(1998). Continuous fertilization on non humiferous acid Oxisols in<br />

Rw anda “Plateau central” soil chemical changes and plant<br />

production. Biotech. Agron. Soc. Environ., 2: 135-142.<br />

Saha S, Prakash V, Kundu S, Kumar N, Mina BL, (2008). Soil<br />

enzymatic activity as affected by long-term application of farmyard<br />

manure and mineral fertilizer under a rainfed soybean–wheat system<br />

in N-W Himalaya. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 44: 309-315.<br />

Salah, SA, Ahmed MA, Al-Kordy MA, Shalaby MAF (2011). Genetic<br />

analysis of energy production in yellow maize hybrids cultivated in<br />

new ly cultivated sandy land. Aus. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 5(5): 104-114.<br />

Sevaram G, Sharma C, Khybri ML, Gupta OP (1998). On sustainability<br />

in yield of maize wheat cropping system under integrated nutrient<br />

management. J. Andaman Sci. Assoc., 14: 21-24.<br />

Shah KP, Arif M (2001). Management of organic farming: Effectiveness<br />

of farmyard manure and nitrogen for maize productivity. Sarhad J.<br />

Agric. 16: 461-466.<br />

Sharma MP, Gupta JP (1998). Effect of organic materials on grain yield<br />

and soil properties in maize–wheat cropping system. Indian J. Agric.<br />

Sci., 68: 715-722.<br />

Nasim et al. 2719<br />

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Deekey DA, (1997). Principles and Procedures of<br />

Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ED. Mc Graw Hill Book. Int.<br />

Co. New York: pp. 400-428.<br />

Tamayo VA, Munoz AR, Diaz AC (1997). Organic fertilizer to maize on<br />

alluvial soils in moderate climate. Actualidades Corpoica, 108: 19-24.<br />

Thomassims J, Bruce LV, Karen LG, Bill M, Green V (1995). Evaluation<br />

of soil and plant nitrogen tests for maize on manured soils of Atlantic<br />

coastal plain. Agron. J., 87: 213-222.<br />

Yang L, Li T, Li F, Lemcoff JH, Cohen S (2008). Fertilization regulates<br />

soil enzymatic activity and fertility dynamics in a cucumber field. Sci.<br />

Hortic., 116: 21-26.<br />

Yang CM, Yang LZ, Yan TM, Ou YZ (2004). Effects of nutrient regimes<br />

on dry matter production and nutrient uptake and distribution by rice<br />

plant. Chinese J. Soil Sci., 35: 199-202.<br />

Younas M, Rehman H, Hyder G, (2002). Magnitude of variability for<br />

yield and yield associated traits in maize hybrids. Asian J. Plant Sci.,<br />

1: 694-696.<br />

Zhu T, Zhuge Y, Liu S, Lou Y, (2008). Effects of different fertilizer<br />

treatments and w ater regimes on soil enzyme activities. Shandong<br />

Agric. Sci., 3: 74-78.


UPCOMING CONFERENCES<br />

International Conference on Agricultural and Food Engineering, Serdang,<br />

Malaysia, 26 Nov 2012<br />

12th International Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology, Rotorua, New<br />

Zealand, 2 Sep 2012


Conferences and Advert<br />

September 2012<br />

Agricultural Biotechnology International Conference (ABIC2012), Christchurch, New<br />

Zealand, 1 Sep 2012<br />

International Conference on Agriculture, Science and Engineering, Omoku, Nigeria, 3<br />

Sep 2012<br />

November 2012<br />

International Conference on Agricultural and Food Engineering (CAFE), Putrajaya,<br />

Malaysia, 17 Nov 2012<br />

December 2012<br />

International Conference on Agricultural, Biotechnology, Biological and Biosystems<br />

Engineering (ICABBBE), Phuket, Thailand, 23 Dec 2012


African Journal of<br />

Agricultural Research<br />

Related <strong>Journals</strong> Published by <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong><br />

■ International Journal of Livestock Production<br />

■ International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture<br />

■ Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics<br />

■ Journal of Stored Products and Postharvest Research<br />

■ Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development<br />

■ Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!