The Components of Plant Tissue Culture Media II - Horticultural ...
The Components of Plant Tissue Culture Media II - Horticultural ...
The Components of Plant Tissue Culture Media II - Horticultural ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 4<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> ll:<br />
Organic Additions, Osmotic and pH Effects,<br />
and Support Systems<br />
Growth and morphogenesis <strong>of</strong> plant tissue<br />
cultures can be improved by small amounts <strong>of</strong> some<br />
organic nutrients. <strong>The</strong>se are mainly vitamins<br />
(including some substances that are not strictly<br />
animal vitamins), amino acids and certain undefined<br />
supplements. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> these substances<br />
required for successful culture varies with the species<br />
and genotype, and is probably a reflection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
synthetic capacity <strong>of</strong> the explant.<br />
1.1. VITAMINS<br />
Vitamins are compounds required by animals in<br />
very small amounts as necessary ancillary food<br />
factors. Absence from the diet leads to abnormal<br />
growth and development and an unhealthy condition.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the same substances are also needed by plant<br />
cells as essential intermediates or metabolic catalysts,<br />
but intact plants, unlike animals, are able to produce<br />
their own requirements. <strong>Culture</strong>d plant cells and<br />
tissues can however become deficient in some<br />
factors; growth and survival is then improved by their<br />
addition to the culture medium.<br />
In early work, the requirements <strong>of</strong> tissue cultures<br />
for trace amounts <strong>of</strong> certain organic substances were<br />
satisfied by “undefined” supplements such as fruit<br />
juices, coconut milk, yeast or malt extracts and<br />
hydrolysed casein. <strong>The</strong>se supplements can contribute<br />
vitamins, amino acids and growth regulants to a<br />
culture medium. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> undefined supplements<br />
has declined as the need for specific organic<br />
compounds has been defined, and these have become<br />
listed in catalogues as pure chemicals.<br />
1.2. THE DEVELOPMENT OF VITAMIN MIXTURES<br />
<strong>The</strong> vitamins most frequently used in plant tissue<br />
culture media are thiamine (Vit. B1), nicotinic acid<br />
(niacin) and pyridoxine (Vit. B6) and apart from these<br />
three compounds, and myo-inositol, there is little<br />
common agreement about which other vitamins are<br />
really essential.<br />
<strong>The</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> adding thiamine was discovered<br />
almost simultaneously by Bonner (1937, 1938),<br />
Robbins and Bartley (1937) and White (1937).<br />
Nicotinic acid and pyridoxine appear, in addition to<br />
1. ORGANIC SUPPLEMENTS<br />
E. F. George et al. (eds.), <strong>Plant</strong> Propagation by <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> 3rd Edition, 115–173.<br />
© 2008 Springer.<br />
115<br />
thiamine, in media published by Bonner (1940),<br />
Gautheret (1942) and White (1943b); this was<br />
following the findings <strong>of</strong> Bonner and Devirian (1939)<br />
that nicotinic acid improved the growth <strong>of</strong> isolated<br />
roots <strong>of</strong> tomato, pea and radish; and the papers <strong>of</strong><br />
Robbins and Schmidt (1939a,b) which indicated that<br />
pyridoxine was also required for tomato root culture.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se four vitamins; myo-inositol, thiamine, nicotinic<br />
acid, and pyridoxine are ingredients <strong>of</strong> Murashige<br />
and Skoog (1962) medium and have been used in<br />
varying proportions for the culture <strong>of</strong> tissues <strong>of</strong> many<br />
plant species (Chapter 3). However, unless there has<br />
been research on the requirements <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />
plant tissue or organ, it is not possible to conclude<br />
that all the vitamins which have been used in a<br />
particular experiment were essential.<br />
<strong>The</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> cells for added vitamins vary<br />
according to the nature <strong>of</strong> the plant and the type <strong>of</strong><br />
culture. Welander (1977) found that Nitsch and<br />
Nitsch (1965) vitamins were not necessary, or were<br />
even inhibitory to direct shoot formation on petiole<br />
explants <strong>of</strong> Begonia x hiemalis. Roest and<br />
Bokelmann (1975) on the other hand, obtained<br />
increased shoot formation on Chrysanthemum<br />
pedicels when MS vitamins were present. Callus <strong>of</strong><br />
Pinus strobus grew best when the level <strong>of</strong> inositol in<br />
MS medium was reduced to 50 mg/l whereas that <strong>of</strong><br />
P. echinata. proliferated most rapidly when no<br />
inositol was present (Kaul and Kochbar, 1985).<br />
Research workers <strong>of</strong>ten tend to adopt a ‘belt and<br />
braces’ attitude to minor media components, and add<br />
unusual supplements just to ensure that there is no<br />
missing factor which will limit the success <strong>of</strong> their<br />
experiment. Sometimes complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> as many<br />
as nine or ten vitamins have been employed.<br />
Experimentation <strong>of</strong>ten shows that some vitamins<br />
can be omitted from recommended media. Although<br />
four vitamins were used in MS medium, later work at<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Skoog’s laboratory showed that the<br />
optimum rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> tobacco callus tissue on<br />
MS salts required the addition <strong>of</strong> only myo-inositol<br />
and thiamine. <strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> thiamine was increased<br />
four-fold over that used by Murashige and Skoog<br />
(1962), but nicotinic acid, pyridoxine and glycine
116<br />
(amino acid) were unnecessary (Linsmaier and<br />
Skoog, 1965). A similar simplification <strong>of</strong> the MS<br />
vitamins was made by Earle and Torrey (1965) for<br />
the culture <strong>of</strong> Convolvulus callus.<br />
Soczck and Hempel (1988) found that in the<br />
medium <strong>of</strong> Murashige et al. (1974) devised for the<br />
shoot culture <strong>of</strong> Gerbera jamesonii, thiamine, pyridoxine<br />
and inositol could be omitted without any<br />
reduction in the rate <strong>of</strong> shoot multiplication <strong>of</strong> their<br />
local cultivars. Ishihara and Katano (1982) found that<br />
Malus shoot cultures could be grown on MS salts<br />
alone, and that inositol and thiamine were largely<br />
unnecessary.<br />
1.3. SPECIFIC COMPOUNDS<br />
Myo-inositol. Myo-inositol (also sometimes<br />
described as meso-inositol or i-inositol) is the only<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the nine theoretical stereoisomers <strong>of</strong> inositol<br />
which has significant biological importance.<br />
Medically it has been classed as a member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Vitamin B complex and is required for the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
yeast and many mammalian cells in tissue culture.<br />
Rats and mice require it for hair growth and can<br />
develop dermatitis when it is not in the diet. Myoinositol<br />
has been classed as a plant ‘vitamin’, but note<br />
that some authors think that it should be regarded as a<br />
supplementary carbohydrate, although it does not<br />
contribute to carbohydrate utilization as an energy<br />
source or as an osmoticum.<br />
Historical use in tissue cultures. Myo-inositol<br />
was first shown by Jacquiot (1951) to favour bud<br />
formation by elm cambial tissue when supplied at 20-<br />
1000 mg/l. Necrosis was retarded, though the<br />
proliferation <strong>of</strong> the callus was not promoted. Myoinositol<br />
at 100 mg/1 was also used by Morel and<br />
Wetmore (1951) in combination with six other<br />
vitamins for the culture <strong>of</strong> callus from the<br />
monocotyledon Amorphophallus rivieri (Araceae).<br />
Bud initials appeared on some cultures and both roots<br />
and buds on others according to the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
auxin employed. <strong>The</strong> vitamin was adopted by both<br />
Wood and Braun (1961) and Murashige and Skoog<br />
(1962) in combination with thiamine, nicotinic acid<br />
and pyridoxine in their preferred media fur the<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> Catharanthus roseus and Nicotiana<br />
tabacum respectively. Many other workers have since<br />
included it in culture media with favourable results<br />
on the rate <strong>of</strong> callus growth or the induction <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenesis. Letham (1966) found that myoinositol<br />
interacted with cytokinin to promote cell<br />
division in carrot phloem explants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
Occurrence and biochemistry. Part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
growth promoting property <strong>of</strong> coconut milk is due to<br />
its myo-inositol content (Pollard et al., 1961).<br />
Coconut milk also contains scyllo-inositol (Table<br />
4.1). This can also promote growth but to a smaller<br />
extent than the myo-isomer (Pollard et al., 1961).<br />
Inositol is a constituent <strong>of</strong> yeast extract (Steiner et al.,<br />
1969; Steiner and Lester, 1972) and small quantities<br />
may also be contained in commercial agar (Wolter<br />
and Skoog, 1966). Myo-inositol is a natural<br />
constituent <strong>of</strong> plants and much <strong>of</strong> it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
incorporated into phosphatidyl-inositol which may be<br />
an important factor in the functioning <strong>of</strong> membranes<br />
(Jung et al., 1972; Harran and Dickinson, 1978). <strong>The</strong><br />
phosphatidylinositol cycle controls various cellular<br />
responses in animal cells and yeasts, but evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
it playing a similar role in plants is only just being<br />
accumulated. Enzymes which are thought to be<br />
involved in the cycle have been observed to have<br />
activities in plants and lithium chloride (which<br />
inhibits myo-inositol-1-phosphatase and decreases the<br />
cycle) inhibits callus formation in Brassica oleracea<br />
(Bagga et al., 1987), and callus growth in<br />
Amaranthus paniculatus (Das et al., 1987). In both<br />
plants the inhibition is reversed by myo-inositol.<br />
As the myo-inositol molecule has six hydroxyl<br />
units, it can react with up to six acid molecules<br />
forming various esters. It appears that inositol<br />
phosphates act as second messengers to the primary<br />
action <strong>of</strong> auxin in plants: phytic acid (inositol hexaphosphate)<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> these. Added to culture media it<br />
can promote tissue growth if it can serve as a source<br />
<strong>of</strong> inositol (Watanabe et al., 1971). In some species,<br />
auxin can be stored and may be transported as IAAmyo-inositol<br />
ester (Chapter 5). o-Methyl-inositol is<br />
present in quite large quantities in legumes; inositol<br />
methyl ethers are known to occur in plants <strong>of</strong> several<br />
other families, although their function is unknown<br />
(Phillips and Smith, 1974).<br />
<strong>The</strong> stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> myo-inositol in plant<br />
cultures probably arises partly from the participation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the compound in biosynthetic pathways leading to<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> the pectin and hemicelluloses needed<br />
in cell walls (Loewus et al., 1962; Loewus, 1974;<br />
Loewus and Loewus, 1980; Harran and Dickinson,<br />
1978; Verma and Dougall, 1979; Loewus and<br />
Loewus, 1980) and may have a role in the uptake and<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> ions (Wood and Braun, 1961). In the<br />
experiments <strong>of</strong> Staudt (1984) mentioned below, when<br />
the P04 3– content <strong>of</strong> the medium was raised to 4.41<br />
mM, the rate <strong>of</strong> callus growth <strong>of</strong> cv. ‘Aris’ was
progressively enhanced as the myo- inositol in the<br />
medium was put up to 4000 mg/l. This result seems<br />
Chapter 4<br />
to stress the importance <strong>of</strong> inositol-containing<br />
phospholipids for growth.<br />
Table 4.1. Substances identified as components <strong>of</strong> coconut milk (water) from mature green fruits and market-purchased fruits.<br />
SUBSTANCE QUANTITY/REFERENCE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY/REFERENCE<br />
Mature green<br />
fruits<br />
Mature fresh<br />
fruits<br />
Mature<br />
green<br />
fruits<br />
Mature fresh<br />
fruits<br />
Amino acids (mg/l) Sugars (g/l)<br />
Alanine 127.3 (14) 312 (13), 177.1<br />
(14)<br />
Sucrose 9.2 (14) 8.9 (14)<br />
Arginine 25.6 (14) 133 (13), 16.8<br />
(14)<br />
Glucose 7.3 (14) 2.5 (14)<br />
Aspartic acid 35.9 (14) 65 (13), 5.4 (14) Fructose 5.3 (14) 2.5 (14)<br />
Asparagine 10.1 (14) ca.60 (13), 10.1<br />
(14)<br />
Sugar alcohols (g/l)<br />
γ-Aminobutyric 34.6 (14) 820 (13), 168.8 Mannitol (1)<br />
acid<br />
(14)<br />
Glutamine acid 70.8 (14) 240 (13), 78.7<br />
(14)<br />
Sorbitol 15.0 (12), (17)<br />
Glutamine 45.4 (14) ca.60 (13), 13.4<br />
(14)<br />
myo-Inositol 0.1 (12), (17)<br />
Glycine 9.7 (14) 13.9 (14) scyllo-Inositol 0.5 (12), (17)<br />
Histidine 6.3 (14) Trace (13,14) Vitamins (mg/l)<br />
Homoserine -- (14) 5.2 (14) Nicotinic acid 0.64 (4)<br />
Hydroxyproline Trace (13,14) Pantolhenic acid 0.52 (4)<br />
Lysine 21.4 65.8 (14) Biotin, Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin 0.02 (4)<br />
Methionine 16.9 (14) 8 (13), Trace (14) Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin 0.01 (4)<br />
Phenylalanine -- (14) 12 (13), 10.2 (14) Folic acid 0.003 (4)<br />
Proline 31.9 97 (13), 21.6 (14) Thiamine, pyridoxine Trace (4)<br />
Serine 45.3 (14) Growth substances (mg/l)<br />
Typtophan 39 (13) Auxin 0.07 (7), (28)<br />
Threonine 16.2 (2) 44 (13), 26.3 (14) Gibberellin Yes (10,28)<br />
Tyrosine 6.4 (14) 16 (13), 3.1 (14) 1,3-Diphenylurea 5.8 (8), (6,17)<br />
Valine 20.6 (14) 27 (13), 15.1 (14) Zeatin (22,26)<br />
Other nitrogenous compounds Zeatin glucoside (26)<br />
Ammonium (19) Zeatin riboside (20), (24), (25)<br />
Ethanolamine (19) 6-Oxypurine growth<br />
promoter<br />
(27)<br />
Dihydroxyphenyl<br />
alanine<br />
(19) Unknown cytokinin/s 6, (18) (22)<br />
Inorganic elements (mg/100g dry wt.) Other (mg/l)<br />
Potassium 312.0 (3) RNA-polymerase (23)<br />
Sodium 105 (3) RNA-phosphorus 20.0 (14) 35.4 (14)<br />
Phosphorus 37.0 (3) DNA-phosphorus 0.1 (14) 3.5 (14)<br />
Magnesium 30.0 (3) Uracil, Adenine 21<br />
Organic acids (meq/ml) Leucoanthocyanins (11) (15,17)<br />
Malic acid 34.3 (14) 12.0 (14) Phyllococosine (16)<br />
Shikimic, Quinic<br />
and 2 unknowns<br />
0.6 (14) 0.41 (2) Acid Phosphatase (5,9)<br />
Pyrrolidone<br />
carboxylic acid<br />
0.4 (14) 0.2 (14) Diastase (2)<br />
Citric acid 0.4 (14) 0.3 (14) Dehydrogenase (5)<br />
Succinic acid -- (14) 0.3 (14) Peroxidase (5)<br />
Catalase (5)<br />
Numbered references (within brackets) in the above table are listed in Section 1.11 <strong>of</strong> this Chapter.<br />
117
118 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
Activity in tissue cultures. <strong>Culture</strong>d plant tissues<br />
vary in their capacity for myo-inositol biosynthesis.<br />
Intact shoots are usually able to produce their own<br />
requirements, but although many unorganised tissues<br />
are able to grow slowly without the vitamin being<br />
added to the medium (Murashige, 1974) the addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> a small quantity is frequently found to stimulate<br />
cell division. <strong>The</strong> compound has been discovered to<br />
be essential to some plants. In the opinion <strong>of</strong> Kaul<br />
and Sabharwal (1975) this includes all monocotyledons,<br />
the media for which, if they do not contain<br />
inositol, need to be complemented with coconut milk,<br />
or yeast extract.<br />
Fraxinus pennsylvanica callus had an absolute<br />
requirement for 10 mg/1 myo-inositol to achieve<br />
maximum growth; higher levels, up to 250 mg/l had<br />
no further effect on fresh or dry weight yields (Wolter<br />
and Skoog, 1966). <strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> shoot buds on<br />
callus <strong>of</strong> Haworthia spp was shown to be dependent<br />
on the availability <strong>of</strong> myo-inositol (Kaul and<br />
Sabharwal, 1972, 1975). In a revised Linsmaier and<br />
Skoog (1965) medium [Staudt (1984) containing 1.84<br />
mM PO4 3– ], callus tissue <strong>of</strong> Vitis vinifera cv ‘Müller-<br />
Thurgau’ did not require myo-inositol for growth, but<br />
that <strong>of</strong> Vitis vinifera x V. riparia cv. ‘Aris’ was<br />
dependent on it and the rate <strong>of</strong> growth increased as<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> myo-inositol was increased up to 250<br />
mg/l (Staudt, 1984).<br />
Gupta et al. (1988) found that it was essential to<br />
add 5 g/l myo-inositol to Gupta and Durzan (1985)<br />
DCR-1 medium to induce embryogenesis (embryonal<br />
suspensor masses) from female gametophyte tissue <strong>of</strong><br />
Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus taeda. <strong>The</strong><br />
concentration necessary seems insufficient to have<br />
acted as an osmotic stimulus (see section 3). myo-<br />
Inositol reduced the rate <strong>of</strong> proliferation in shoot<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Euphorbia fulgens (Zhang et al., 1986).<br />
Thiamine. Thiamine (Vit. B1, aneurine) in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> thiamine pyrophosphate, is an essential c<strong>of</strong>actor<br />
in carbohydrate metabolism and is directly<br />
involved in the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> some amino acids. It<br />
has been added to plant culture media more<br />
frequently than any other vitamin. <strong>Tissue</strong>s <strong>of</strong> most<br />
plants seem to require it for growth, the need<br />
becoming more apparent with consecutive passages,<br />
but some cultured cells are self sufficient. <strong>The</strong> maize<br />
suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> Polikarpochkina et al. (1979)<br />
showed much less growth in passage 2, and died in<br />
the third passage when thiamine was omitted from<br />
the medium.<br />
MS medium contains 0.3 μM thiamine. That this<br />
may not be sufficient to obtain optimum results from<br />
some cultures is illustrated by the results <strong>of</strong> Barwale<br />
et al. (1986): increasing the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
thiamine-HCI in MS medium to 5 μM, increased the<br />
frequency with which zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> Glycine<br />
max formed somatic embryos from 33% to 58%.<br />
Adding 30 μM nicotinic acid (normally 4 μM)<br />
improved the occurrence <strong>of</strong> embryogenesis even<br />
further to 76%. Thiamine was found to be essential<br />
for stimulating embryogenic callus induction in<br />
Zoysia japonica, a warm season turf grass from Japan<br />
(Asano et al., 1996). It has also been shown to<br />
stimulate adventitious rooting <strong>of</strong> Taxus spp. (Chée,<br />
1995).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re can be an interaction between thiamine and<br />
cytokinin growth regulators. Digby and Skoog (1966)<br />
discovered that normal callus cultures <strong>of</strong> tobacco<br />
produced an adequate level <strong>of</strong> thiamine to support<br />
growth providing a relatively high level <strong>of</strong> kinetin<br />
(ca. 1 mg/l) was added to the medium, but the tissue<br />
failed to grow when moved to a medium with less<br />
added kinetin unless thiamine was provided.<br />
Sometimes a change from a thiamine-requiring to<br />
a thiamine-sufficient state occurs during culture (see<br />
habituation – Chapter 7). In rice callus, thiamine<br />
influenced morphogenesis in a way that depended on<br />
which state the cells were in. Presence <strong>of</strong> the vitamin<br />
in a pre-culture (Stage I) medium caused thiaminesufficient<br />
callus to form root primordia on an<br />
induction (Stage <strong>II</strong>) medium, but suppressed the<br />
stimulating effect <strong>of</strong> kinetin on Stage <strong>II</strong> shoot<br />
formation in thiamine-requiring callus. It was<br />
essential to omit thiamine from the Stage I medium to<br />
induce thiamine-sufficient callus to produce shoots at<br />
Stage <strong>II</strong> (Inoue and Maeda, 1982).<br />
1.4. OTHER VITAMINS<br />
Pantothenic acid. Pantothenic acid plays an<br />
important role in the growth <strong>of</strong> certain tissues. It<br />
favoured callus production by hawthorn stem<br />
fragments (Morel, 1946) and stimulated tissue<br />
proliferation in willow and black henbane (Telle and<br />
Gautheret, 1947; Gautheret, 1948). However,<br />
pantothenic acid showed no effects with carrot, vine<br />
and Virginia creeper tissues which synthesize it in<br />
significant amounts (ca. 1 μg/ml).<br />
Vitamin C. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> Vitamin C (L-ascorbic<br />
acid) as a component <strong>of</strong> culture media will be<br />
discussed in Chapter 12. <strong>The</strong> compound is also used<br />
during explant isolation and to prevent blackening.
Besides, its role as an antioxidant, ascorbic acid is<br />
involved in cell division and elongation, e.g., in<br />
tobacco cells (de Pinto et al., 1999). Ascorbic acid<br />
(4-8 x 10 –4 M) also enhanced shoot formation in both<br />
young and old tobacco callus. (Joy et al., 1988). It<br />
speeded up the shoot-forming process, and<br />
completely reversed the inhibition <strong>of</strong> shoot formation<br />
by gibberellic acid in young callus, but was less<br />
effective in old callus. Clearly its action here was not<br />
as a vitamin.<br />
Vitamin D. Some vitamins in the D group,<br />
notably vitamin D2 and D3 can have a growth<br />
regulatory effect on plant tissue cultures. <strong>The</strong>ir effect<br />
is discussed in Chapter 7.<br />
Vitamin E. <strong>The</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> vitamin E<br />
(α-tocopherol) will be discussed in Chapter 12.<br />
Other vitamins. Evidence has been obtained that<br />
folic acid slows tissue proliferation in the dark, while<br />
enhancing it in the light. This is probably because it<br />
is hydrolysed in the light to p-aminobenzoic acid<br />
(PAB). In the presence <strong>of</strong> auxin, PAB has been<br />
shown to have a weak growth-stimulatory effect on<br />
cultured plant tissues (de Capite, 1952a,b).<br />
Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin which is a component <strong>of</strong> some vitamin<br />
mixtures, has been found to inhibit callus formation<br />
but it may improve the growth and quality <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />
(Drew and Smith, 1986). Suppression <strong>of</strong> callus<br />
growth can mean that the vitamin may either inhibit<br />
or stimulate root formation on cuttings. Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />
has been shown to stimulate adventitious rooting on<br />
shoots <strong>of</strong> Carica papaya (Drew et al., 1993), apple<br />
shoots (van der Krieken et al., 1992) and Eucalyptus<br />
globulus (Trindade and Pais, 1997). It also enhances<br />
embryogenic callus induction in Zoysia japonica in<br />
association with cytokinins and thiamine (Asano<br />
et al., 1996).<br />
Glycine is occasionally described as a vitamin in<br />
plant tissue cultures: its use has been described in the<br />
section on amino acids.<br />
Adenine. Adenine (or adenine sulphate) has been<br />
widely used in tissue culture media, but because it<br />
mainly gives rise to effects which are similar to those<br />
produced by cytokinins, it is considered in the chapter<br />
on cytokinins (Chapter 6).<br />
Stability. Some vitamins are heat-labile; see the<br />
section on medium preparation in Volume 2.<br />
1.5. UNDEFINED SUPPLEMENTS<br />
Many undefined supplements were employed in<br />
early tissue culture media. <strong>The</strong>ir use has slowly<br />
declined as the balance between inorganic salts has<br />
been improved, and as the effect <strong>of</strong> amino acids and<br />
Chapter 4<br />
119<br />
growth substances has become better understood.<br />
Nevertheless several supplements <strong>of</strong> uncertain and<br />
variable composition are still in common use.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first successful cultures <strong>of</strong> plant tissue<br />
involved the use <strong>of</strong> yeast extract (Robbins, 1922;<br />
White, 1934). Other undefined additions made to<br />
plant tissue culture media have been:<br />
• meat, malt and yeast extracts and fibrin digest;<br />
• juices, pulps and extracts from various fruits<br />
(Steward and Shantz, 1959; Ranga Swamy, 1963;<br />
Guha and Maheshwari, 1964, 1967), including those<br />
from bananas and tomatoes (La Rue, 1949);<br />
• the fluids which nourish immature zygotic<br />
embryos;<br />
• extracts <strong>of</strong> seedlings (Saalbach and Koblitz, 1978)<br />
or plant leaves (Borkird and Sink, 1983);<br />
• the extract <strong>of</strong> boiled potatoes and corn steep<br />
liquor (Fox and Miller, 1959);<br />
• plant sap or the extract <strong>of</strong> roots or rhizomes. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
roots are thought to be the main site <strong>of</strong> cytokinin<br />
synthesis in plants (Chapter 6);<br />
• protein (usually casein) hydrolysates (containing a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> all the amino acids present in the original<br />
protein). Casein hydrolysates are sometimes termed<br />
casamino acids: they are discussed in Chapter 3).<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> these amendments can be a source <strong>of</strong><br />
amino acids, peptides, fatty acids, carbohydrates,<br />
vitamins and plant growth substances in different<br />
concentrations. Those which have been most widely<br />
used are described below.<br />
1.6. YEAST EXTRACT.<br />
Yeast extract (YE) is used less as an ingredient <strong>of</strong><br />
plant media nowadays than in former times, when it<br />
was added as a source <strong>of</strong> amino acids and vitamins,<br />
especially inositol and thiamine (Vitamin B1) (Bonner<br />
and Addicott, l937; Robbins and Bartley, 1937). In a<br />
medium consisting only <strong>of</strong> macro- and micronutrients,<br />
the provision <strong>of</strong> yeast extract was <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
found to be essential for tissue growth (White, 1934;<br />
Robbins and Bartley, 1937). <strong>The</strong> vitamin content <strong>of</strong><br />
yeast extract distinguishes it from casein hydrolysate<br />
(CH) so that in such media CH or amino acids alone,<br />
could not be substituted for YE (Straus and La Rue,<br />
1954; Nickell and Maretzki, 1969). It was soon<br />
found that amino acids such as glycine, lysine and<br />
arginine, and vitamins such as thiamine and nicotinic<br />
acid, could serve as replacements for YE, for<br />
example in the growth <strong>of</strong> tomato roots (Skinner and<br />
Street, 1954), or sugar cane cell suspensions (Nickell<br />
and Maretzki, 1969).
120 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> amino acids in a typical yeast<br />
extract is high (e.g. 7% amino nitrogen - Nickell and<br />
Maretzki, 1969; Bridson, 1978; Thom et al., 1981),<br />
but there is less glutamic acid than in casein or other<br />
protein hydrolysate. Malt extract contains little<br />
nitrogen (ca. 0.5% in total).<br />
Yeast extract has been typically added to media in<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.1-1 g/l; occasionally 5, 10 and<br />
even 20 g/l (Morel and Muller, 1964) have been<br />
included. It normally only enhances growth in media<br />
containing relatively low concentrations <strong>of</strong> nitrogen,<br />
or where vitamins are lacking. Addition <strong>of</strong> 125-5000<br />
mg/l YE to MS medium completely inhibited the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> green callus <strong>of</strong> 5 different plants whereas<br />
small quantities added to Vasil and Hildebrandt<br />
(1966) THS medium (which contained 0.6 times the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> NO3 – and NH4 + ions and unlike MS did<br />
not contain nicotinic acid or pyridoxine) gave more<br />
vigorous growth <strong>of</strong> carrot, endive and lettuce callus<br />
than occurred on MS. <strong>The</strong>re was still no growth <strong>of</strong><br />
parsley and tomato callus on THS medium: these<br />
tissues only grew well on unmodified MS (Vasil and<br />
Hildebrandt, 1966a,b,c).<br />
Stage I media are sometimes fortified with yeast<br />
extract to reveal the presence <strong>of</strong> micro-organisms<br />
which may have escaped decontamination<br />
procedures: it is then omitted at later stages <strong>of</strong><br />
culture.<br />
Yeast extract has been shown to have some<br />
unusual properties which may relate to its amino acid<br />
content. It elicits phytoalexin accumulation in<br />
several plant species and in Glycyrrhiza echinata<br />
suspensions it stimulated chalcone synthase activity<br />
leading to the formation <strong>of</strong> narengin (Ayabe et al.,<br />
1988). It also stimulated furomocoumarin production<br />
in Glehnia littoralis cell suspensions (Kitamura et al.,<br />
1998). On Monnier (1976, 1978) medium 1 g/l yeast<br />
extract was found to inhibit the growth <strong>of</strong> immature<br />
zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> Linum, an effect which, when<br />
0.05 mg/1 BAP and 400 mg/l glutamine were added,<br />
induced the direct formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious embryos<br />
(Pretova and Williams, 1986).<br />
Yeast extract is now purchased directly from<br />
chemical suppliers. In the 1930s and 1940s it was<br />
prepared in the laboratory. Brink et al. (1944)<br />
macerated yeast in water which was then boiled for<br />
30 minutes and, after cooling, the starchy material<br />
was removed by centrifugation. However, Robbins<br />
and Bartley (1937) found that the active components<br />
<strong>of</strong> yeast could be extracted with 80% ethanol.<br />
1.7. POTATO EXTRACT<br />
Workers in China found that there was a sharp<br />
increase in the number <strong>of</strong> pollen plants produced<br />
from wheat anthers when they were cultured on an<br />
agar solidified medium containing only an extract <strong>of</strong><br />
boiled potatoes, 0.1 mM FeEDTA, 9% sucrose and<br />
growth regulators. Potato extract alone or potato<br />
extract combined with components <strong>of</strong> conventional<br />
culture media (Chuang et al., 1978) has since been<br />
found to provide a useful medium for the anther<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> wheat and some other cereal plants. For<br />
example, the potato medium was found to be better<br />
for the anther culture <strong>of</strong> spring wheat than the<br />
synthetic (N6) medium (McGregor and McHughen,<br />
1990). Sopory et al. (1978) obtained the initiation <strong>of</strong><br />
embryogenesis from potato anthers on potato extract<br />
alone and Lichter (1981) found it beneficial to add<br />
2.5 g/l Difco potato extract to a medium for Brassica<br />
napus anther culture, but it was omitted by Chuong<br />
and Beversdorf (1985) when they repeated this work.<br />
We are not aware <strong>of</strong> potato extract being added to<br />
media for micropropagation, apart from occasional<br />
reports <strong>of</strong> its use for orchid propagation. Sagawa and<br />
Kunisaki (1982) supplemented 1 litre <strong>of</strong> Vacin and<br />
Went (1949) medium with the extract from 100g<br />
potatoes boiled for 5 minutes, and Harvais (1982)<br />
added 5% <strong>of</strong> an extract from 200g potatoes boiled in<br />
1 litre water to his orchid medium. Of interest was<br />
the finding that potato juice treatment enabled in vitro<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Doritaenopsis (Orchidaceae) to recover<br />
from hyperhydricity (Zou, 1995).<br />
1.8. MALT EXTRACT<br />
Although no longer commonly used, malt extract<br />
seems to play a specific role in cultures <strong>of</strong> Citrus.<br />
Malt extract, mainly a source <strong>of</strong> carbohydrates, was<br />
shown to initiate embryogenesis in nucellar explants<br />
(Rangan et al., 1968; Rangan, 1984). Several recent<br />
studies showed a role for the extract in the<br />
multiplication <strong>of</strong> Citrus sinensis somatic embryos<br />
(Das et al., 1995), and in other Citrus spp. (Jumin,<br />
1995), in the promotion <strong>of</strong> plantlet formation from<br />
somatic embryos derived from styles <strong>of</strong> different<br />
Citrus cultivars (De Pasquale et al., 1994), and in<br />
somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration<br />
from pistil thin cell layers <strong>of</strong> Citrus (Carimi et al.,<br />
1999). Malt extract also promoted germination <strong>of</strong><br />
early cotyledonary stage embryos arising from the in<br />
vitro rescue <strong>of</strong> zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> sour orange<br />
(Carimi et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong> extract is commercially<br />
available and used at a level <strong>of</strong> 0.5 – 1 g/l.
1.9. BANANA HOMOGENATE<br />
Homogenised banana fruit is sometimes added to<br />
media for the culture <strong>of</strong> orchids and is <strong>of</strong>ten reported<br />
to promote growth. <strong>The</strong> reason for its stimulatory<br />
effect has not been explained. One suggestion<br />
mentioned earlier is that it might help to stabilise the<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> the medium. Pierik et al. (1988) found that it<br />
was slightly inhibitory to the germination <strong>of</strong><br />
Paphiopedilum ciliolare seedlings but promoted the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> seedlings once germination had taken<br />
place.<br />
1.10. FLUIDS WHICH NOURISH EMBRYOS<br />
<strong>The</strong> liquid which is present in the embryo sac <strong>of</strong><br />
immature fruits <strong>of</strong> Aesculus (e.g. A. woerlitzensis)<br />
(Shantz and Steward, 1956, 1964; Steward and<br />
Shantz, 1959; Steward and Rao, 1970) and Juglans<br />
regia (Steward and Caplin, 1952) has been found to<br />
have a strong growth-promoting effect on some plant<br />
tissues cultured on simple media, although growth<br />
inhibition has occasionally been reported<br />
(Fonnesbech, 1972). Fluid from the immature female<br />
gametophyte <strong>of</strong> Ginkgo biloba (Steward and Caplin,<br />
1952) and extracts from the female gametophyte <strong>of</strong><br />
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mapes and Zaerr, 1981) and<br />
immature Zea mays grains (less than two weeks after<br />
pollination) can have a similar effect. <strong>The</strong> most<br />
readily obtained fluid with this kind <strong>of</strong> activity is<br />
coconut milk (water).<br />
1.11. COCONUT MILK/WATER<br />
When added to a medium containing auxin, the<br />
liquid endosperm <strong>of</strong> Cocos nucifera fruits can induce<br />
plant cells to divide and grow rapidly. <strong>The</strong> fluid is<br />
most commonly referred to as coconut milk, although<br />
Tulecke et al. (1961) maintained that the correct<br />
English term is ‘coconut water’, because the term<br />
coconut milk also describes the white liquid obtained<br />
by grating the solid white coconut endosperm (the<br />
‘meat’) in water and this is not generally used in<br />
tissue culture media. However, in this section, both<br />
terms are used.<br />
Coconut milk was first used in tissue cultures by<br />
Van Overbeek et al. (1941, 1942) who found that its<br />
addition to a culture medium was necessary for the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> very young embryos <strong>of</strong> Datura<br />
stramonium. Gautheret (1942) found that coconut<br />
milk could be used to initiate and maintain growth in<br />
tissue cultures <strong>of</strong> several plants, and Caplin and<br />
Steward (1948) showed that callus derived from<br />
phloem tissue explants <strong>of</strong> Daucus carota roots grew<br />
much more rapidly when 15% coconut milk was<br />
Chapter 4<br />
121<br />
added to a medium containing IAA. Unlike other<br />
undefined supplements to culture media (such as<br />
yeast extract, malt extract and casein hydrolysate)<br />
coconut milk has proved harder to replace by fully<br />
defined media. <strong>The</strong> liquid has been found to be<br />
beneficial for inducing growth <strong>of</strong> both callus and<br />
suspension cultures and for the induction <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenesis. Although commercial plant tissue<br />
culture laboratories (particularly those in temperate<br />
countries) would endeavour not to use this ingredient<br />
on account <strong>of</strong> its cost, it is still frequently employed<br />
for special purposes in research.<br />
It is possible to get callus growth on coconut milk<br />
alone (Steward et al., 1952), but normally it is added<br />
to a recognised medium. Effective stimulation only<br />
occurs when relatively large quantities are added to a<br />
medium; the incorporation <strong>of</strong> 10-15 percent by<br />
volume is quite usual. For instance, Burnet and<br />
Ibrahim (1973) found that 20% coconut milk (i.e.<br />
one-fifth <strong>of</strong> the final volume <strong>of</strong> the medium) was<br />
required for the initiation and continued growth <strong>of</strong><br />
callus tissue <strong>of</strong> various Citrus species in MS medium;<br />
Rangan (1974) has obtained improved growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Panicum miliaceum in MS medium using 2,4-D in<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> 15% coconut milk. By contrast, Vasil<br />
and co-workers (e.g. Vasil and Vasil, 1981a,b)<br />
needed to add only 5% coconut milk to MS medium<br />
to obtain somatic embryogenesis from cereal callus<br />
and suspension cultures.<br />
Many workers try to avoid having to use coconut<br />
milk in their protocols. It is an undefined supplement<br />
whose composition can vary considerably (Swedlund<br />
and Locy, 1988). However, adding coconut milk to<br />
media <strong>of</strong>ten provides a simple way to obtain<br />
satisfactory growth or morphogenesis without the<br />
need to work out a suitably defined formulation.<br />
Suggestions that coconut milk is essential for a<br />
particular purpose need to be treated with some<br />
caution. For instance, in the culture <strong>of</strong> embryogenic<br />
callus from root and petiole explants <strong>of</strong> Daucus<br />
carota, coconut milk could be replaced satisfactorily<br />
either by adenine or kinetin, showing that it did not<br />
contribute any unique substances required for<br />
embryogenesis (Halperin and Wetherell, 1964).<br />
Preparation. Ready prepared coconut water<br />
(milk) can be purchased from some chemical<br />
suppliers, but the liquid from fresh nuts (obtained<br />
from the greengrocer) is usually perfectly adequate.<br />
One nut will usually yield at least 100 ml. <strong>The</strong> water<br />
is most simply drained from dehusked coconuts by<br />
drilling holes through two <strong>of</strong> the micropyles. Only<br />
normal uncontaminated water should be used and so
122 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
nuts should be extracted one by one, and the liquid<br />
endosperm from each examined to ascertain that it is<br />
unfermented before addition to a bulk supply. Water<br />
from green but mature coconuts may contain slightly<br />
different quantities <strong>of</strong> substances to that in the nuts<br />
purchased in the local market (Table 4.1) and has<br />
been said to be a more effective stimulant in plant<br />
media than that from ripe fruits, but Morel and<br />
Wetmore (1951) found to the contrary. Tulecke et al.<br />
(1961) discovered that the water from highly<br />
immature coconuts contained smaller quantities <strong>of</strong><br />
the substances normally present in mature nuts.<br />
References to composition <strong>of</strong> coconut water<br />
(numbers refer to citations in Table 4.1). (1)<br />
Dunstan (1906), (2) DeKruijff (1906), (3) McCance<br />
and Widdowson (1940), (4) Vandenbelt (1945), (5)<br />
Sadasivan (1951), (6) Shantz and Steward (1952), (7)<br />
Paris and Duhamet (1953), (8) Shantz and Steward<br />
(1955), (9) Wilson and Cutter (1955), (10) Radley<br />
and Dear (1958), (11) Steward and Shantz (1959),<br />
(12) Pollard et al. (1961), (13) Figures <strong>of</strong> Steward<br />
et al. (1961), given by Raghavan (1977), (14)<br />
Tulecke et al. (1961), (15) Steward and Mohan Ram<br />
(1961), (16) Kuraishi and Okumura (1961), (17)<br />
Steward (1963), (18) Zwar et al. (1963), (19) Steward<br />
et al. (1964), (20) Letham (1968), (21) Steward et al.<br />
(1969), (22) Zwar and Bruce (1970), (23) Mondal<br />
et al. (1972), (24) Letham (1974), (25) Van Staden<br />
and Drewes (1975), (26) Van Staden (1976), (27)<br />
Letham (1982), (28) Dix and Van Staden (1982).<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> Coconut water. Coconut water is usually<br />
strained through cloth and deproteinized by being<br />
heated to 80-100°C for about 10 minutes while being<br />
stirred. It is then allowed to settle and the supernatant<br />
is separated from the coagulated proteins by filtration<br />
through paper. <strong>The</strong> liquid is stored frozen at -20°C.<br />
Borkird and Sink (1983) did not boil the water from<br />
fresh ripe coconuts, but having filtered it through<br />
several layers <strong>of</strong> cheesecloth, adjusted the pH to 10<br />
with 2 N NaOH and then kept it overnight at 4°C.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following day the pH was re-adjusted to 7.0 with<br />
5 N HCl, and the preparation was refiltered before<br />
being stored frozen at –20°C.<br />
Some workers autoclave media containing<br />
coconut milk; others filter-sterilise coconut milk and<br />
add it to a medium after autoclaving has been carried<br />
out. Morel and Wetmore (1951) used filter<br />
sterilisation, but found that the milk lost its potency if<br />
stored sterile (but presumably unfrozen) for 3<br />
months. Street (1977) advocated autoclaving coconut<br />
milk after it had been boiled and filtered; it was then<br />
stored at -20°C until required.<br />
Active ingredients. <strong>The</strong> remarkable growth<br />
stimulating property <strong>of</strong> coconut milk has led to<br />
attempts to isolate and identify the active principles.<br />
This has proved to be difficult because the fractions<br />
into which coconut milk has been separated each<br />
possess only a small proportion <strong>of</strong> the total activity<br />
and the different components appear to act<br />
synergistically. Substances so far identified include<br />
amino acids, organic acids, nucleic acids, purines,<br />
sugars, sugar alcohols, vitamins, growth substances<br />
and minerals (Table 4.1). <strong>The</strong> variable nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
product is illustrated in the table by the analytical<br />
results obtained by different authors.<br />
Auxin activity. <strong>The</strong> liquid has been found to have<br />
some auxin activity which is increased by<br />
autoclaving, probably because any such growth<br />
substances exist in a bound form and are released by<br />
hydrolysis. But although coconut milk can stimulate<br />
the growth <strong>of</strong> some in vitro cultures in the absence <strong>of</strong><br />
exogenous auxin, it normally contains little <strong>of</strong> this<br />
kind <strong>of</strong> growth regulator and an additional exogenous<br />
supply is generally required. In modern media,<br />
where organic compounds are <strong>of</strong>ten added in defined<br />
amounts, the main benefit from using coconut milk is<br />
almost certainly due to its providing highly active<br />
natural cytokinin growth substances.<br />
Cytokinin activity. Coconut milk was shown to<br />
have cytokinin activity by Kuraishi and Okumura<br />
(1961) and recognised natural cytokinin substances<br />
have since been isolated [9-β-D-ribo-furanosyl zeatin<br />
(Letham, 1968); zeatin and several unidentified ones<br />
(Zwar and Bruce, 1970); N, N′-diphenyl urea (Shantz<br />
and Steward, 1955)] but the levels <strong>of</strong> these<br />
compounds in various samples <strong>of</strong> coconut milk have<br />
not been published. An unusual cytokinin-like<br />
growth promoter, 2-(3-methylbut-2-enylamino)-purin-<br />
6-one was isolated by Letham (1982).<br />
Because coconut milk contains natural cytokinins,<br />
adding it to media <strong>of</strong>ten has the same effect as adding<br />
a recognised cytokinin. This means that a beneficial<br />
effect on growth or morphogenesis is <strong>of</strong>ten dependent<br />
on the presence <strong>of</strong> an auxin. Steward and Caplin<br />
(1951) showed that there was a synergistic action<br />
between 2,4-D and coconut milk in stimulating the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> potato tuber tissue. Lin and Staba (1961)<br />
similarly found that coconut milk gave significantly<br />
improved callus growth on seedling explants <strong>of</strong><br />
peppermint and spearmint initiated by 2,4-D, but only<br />
slightly improved the growth initiated by the auxin 2-<br />
BTOA (2-benziothiazoleoxyacetic acid). <strong>The</strong><br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> gibberellin-like substances in coconut<br />
milk has also been reported (Radley and Dear, 1958).
Suboptimum stimulation and inhibition. In<br />
cases where optimal concentrations <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
adjuvants have been determined, it has been found<br />
that the level <strong>of</strong> the same or analogous substances in<br />
coconut milk may be suboptimal. La Motte (1960)<br />
noted that 150 mg/l <strong>of</strong> tyrosine most effectively<br />
induced morphogenesis in tobacco callus cultures, but<br />
coconut milk added at 15% would provide only 0.96<br />
mg/l <strong>of</strong> this substance (Tulecke et al., 1961). Fresh<br />
and autoclaved coconut milk from mature nuts has<br />
proved inhibitory to growth or morphogenesis (Noh<br />
et al., 1988) in some instances. It is not known which<br />
ingredients cause the inhibition but the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
cultured embryos seems particularly liable to be<br />
prevented, suggesting that the compound responsible<br />
might be a natural dormancy-inducing factor such as<br />
abscisic acid. Van Overbeck et al. (1942, 1944)<br />
found that a factor was present in coconut milk which<br />
Organic acids can have three roles in plant culture<br />
media:<br />
• they may act as chelating agents, improving the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> some micronutrients,<br />
• they can buffer the medium against pH change,<br />
• they may act as nutrients.<br />
A beneficial effect is largely restricted to the acids<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Krebs’ cycle. Dougall et al. (1979) found that<br />
20 mM succinate, malate or fumarate supported<br />
maximum growth <strong>of</strong> wild carrot cells when the<br />
medium was initially adjusted to pH 4.5. Although 1<br />
mM glutarate, adipate, pimelate, suberate, azelate or<br />
phthalate controlled the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium, little or<br />
no cell growth took place.<br />
2.1. USE AS BUFFERS<br />
<strong>The</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> organic acids to plant media is not<br />
a recent development. Various authors have found<br />
that some organic acids and their sodium or<br />
potassium salts stabilise the pH <strong>of</strong> hydroponic<br />
solutions (Trelease and Trelease, 1933) or in vitro<br />
media (Van Overbeek et al., 1941, 1942; Arnow<br />
et al., 1953), although it must be admitted that they<br />
are not as effective as synthetic biological buffers in<br />
this respect (see Section 5). Norstog and Smith<br />
(1963) discovered that 100 mg/l malic acid acted as<br />
an effective buffering agent in their medium for<br />
barley embryo culture and also appeared to enhance<br />
growth in the presence <strong>of</strong> glutamine and alanine.<br />
Malic acid, now at 1000 mg/l was retained in the<br />
improved Norstog (1973) Barley <strong>II</strong> medium. In the<br />
Chapter 4<br />
2. ORGANIC ACIDS<br />
123<br />
was essential for the growth <strong>of</strong> Datura stramonium<br />
embryos, but that heating the milk or allowing it to<br />
stand could lead to the release <strong>of</strong> toxic substances.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se could be removed by shaking with alcohols or<br />
ether or lead acetate precipitation. Duhamet and<br />
Mentzer (1955) isolated nine fractions <strong>of</strong> coconut<br />
milk by chromatography, and found one <strong>of</strong> these to<br />
be inhibitory to cultured crown gall tissues <strong>of</strong> black<br />
salsify when more than 10-20% coconut milk was<br />
incorporated into the medium. Norstog (1965)<br />
showed that autoclaved coconut milk could inhibit<br />
the growth <strong>of</strong> barley embryos but that filter-sterilised<br />
milk was stimulatory. Coconut water inhibited<br />
somatic embryo induction in Pinus taeda (Li and<br />
Huang, 1996) and both autoclaved or filter-sterilized<br />
coconut milk inhibited the growth <strong>of</strong> wheat embryoshoot<br />
apices (Smith, 1967).<br />
experiments <strong>of</strong> Schenk and Hildebrandt (1972) low<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> citrate and succinate ions did not impede<br />
callus growth <strong>of</strong> a wide variety <strong>of</strong> plants and<br />
appeared to be stimulatory in some species. <strong>The</strong><br />
acids were also effective buffers between pH 5 and<br />
pH 6, but autoclaving a medium containing sodium<br />
citrate or citric acid caused a substantial pH increase..<br />
2.1.1. Complexing with metals<br />
Divalent organic acids such is citric, maleic, malic<br />
and malonic (depending on species) are found in the<br />
xylem sap <strong>of</strong> plants, where together with amino acids<br />
they can complex with metal ions and assist their<br />
transport (White et al., 1981). <strong>The</strong>se acids can also<br />
be secreted from cultured cells and tissues into the<br />
growth medium and will contribute to the<br />
conditioning effect. Ojima and Ohira (1980)<br />
discovered that malic and citric acids, released into<br />
the medium by rice cells during the latter half <strong>of</strong> a<br />
passage, were able to make unchelated ferric iron<br />
available, so correcting an iron deficiency.<br />
2.1.2. Nutritional role<br />
As explained in Chapter 3, adding Krebs’ cycle<br />
organic acids to the medium can enhance the<br />
metabolism <strong>of</strong> NH4 + . Gamborg and Shyluk (1970)<br />
found that some organic acids could promote<br />
ammonium utilisation and the incorporation <strong>of</strong> small<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> sodium pyruvate, citric, malic and<br />
fumaric acids into the medium, was one factor which<br />
enabled Kao and Michayluk (1975) to culture Vicia<br />
hajastana cells at low density. <strong>The</strong>ir mixture <strong>of</strong>
124 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
organic acid ions has been copied into many other<br />
media designed for protoplast culture. <strong>Culture</strong>s may<br />
not tolerate the addition <strong>of</strong> a large quantity <strong>of</strong> a free<br />
acid which will acidify the medium. For example,<br />
Triticale anther callus grew well on Chu et al. (1975)<br />
N6 medium supplemented with 35 mg/l <strong>of</strong> a mixture<br />
<strong>of</strong> sodium pyruvate, malic acid, fumaric acid, citric<br />
acid, but not when 100 mg/l was added (Chien and<br />
Kao, 1983). When organic anions are added to the<br />
medium from the sodium or potassium salts <strong>of</strong> an<br />
acid there are metallic cations to counterbalance the<br />
organic anions, and it seems to be possible to add<br />
larger quantities without toxicity. Five mM (1240<br />
mg/l .3H2O) potassium succinate enhanced the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> cultured peach embryos (Ramming, 1990),<br />
and adding 15 mM (4052 mg/1 .4H2O) sodium<br />
succinate to MS medium (while also increasing the<br />
sucrose content from 3% to 6%) increased the cell<br />
volume and dry weight <strong>of</strong> Brassica nigra suspensions<br />
by 2.7 times (Molnar, 1988).<br />
Some plants seem to derive nutritional benefit<br />
from the presence <strong>of</strong> one particular organic acid.<br />
Murashige and Tucker (1969) showed that orange<br />
juice added to a medium containing MS salts<br />
promoted the growth <strong>of</strong> Citrus albedo callus. Malic<br />
and other Krebs’ cycle acids also have a similar<br />
effect; <strong>of</strong> these, citric acid produces the most<br />
pronounced growth stimulation. A concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
up to 10.4 mM can be effective (Goldschmidt, 1976;<br />
Einset, l978; Erner and Reuveni, 1981). Succulent<br />
plants, in particular those in the family Crassulaccae,<br />
such as Bryophyllum and Kalanchoe fix relatively<br />
large amounts <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide during darkness,<br />
converting it into organic acids, <strong>of</strong> which malic acid<br />
is particularly important. <strong>The</strong> organic acids are<br />
metabolised during daylight hours. In such plants,<br />
malic acid might be expected to prove especially<br />
efficient in enhancing growth if added to a culture<br />
medium. Lassocinski (1985) has shown this to be the<br />
case in chlorophyll-deficient cacti <strong>of</strong> three genera.<br />
<strong>The</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> L-malic acid to the medium <strong>of</strong><br />
Savage et al. (1979) markedly improved the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
survival and vigour <strong>of</strong> small cacti or areoles.<br />
Organic acid (citrate, lactate, succinate, tartrate,<br />
and oxalate) pretreatment <strong>of</strong> alfalfa callus<br />
dramatically decreased the growth <strong>of</strong> callus, but<br />
increased the subsequent yield <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos<br />
and embryo development, as well as conversion to<br />
plantlets (Nichol et al., 1991). <strong>The</strong>y suggested that<br />
the acids may act in the physiological selection for<br />
embryogenic callus, by inducing preferential growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> slower-growing-compact cell aggregates compared<br />
to the faster growing friable callus.<br />
3. SUGARS -NUTRITIONAL AND REGULATORY EFFECTS<br />
Carbohydrates play an important role in in vitro<br />
cultures as an energy and carbon source, as well as an<br />
osmotic agent. In addition, carbohydrate-modulated<br />
gene expression in plants is known (Koch, 1996).<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> gene responses to changing carbohydrate status<br />
can vary markedly. Some genes are induced, some<br />
are repressed, and others minimally affected. As in<br />
microorganisms, sugar-sensitive plant genes are part<br />
<strong>of</strong> an ancient system <strong>of</strong> cellular adjustment to critical<br />
nutrient availability. However, there is no evidence<br />
that this role <strong>of</strong> carbohydrate is important in normal<br />
growth and organized development in cell<br />
cultures.3.1. Sugars as energy sources<br />
3.1.1. Carbohydrate autotrophy.<br />
Only a limited number <strong>of</strong> plant cell lines have<br />
been isolated which are autotrophic when cultured in<br />
vitro. Autotrophic cells are capable <strong>of</strong> fully<br />
supplying their own carbohydrate needs by carbon<br />
dioxide assimilation during photosynthesis<br />
(Bergmann, 1967; Tandeau de Marsac and Peaud-<br />
Lenoel, 1972a,b; Chandler et al., 1972; Anon, 1980;<br />
Larosa et al., 1981). Many autotrophic cultures have<br />
only been capable <strong>of</strong> relatively slow growth (e.g.<br />
Fukami and Hildebrandt, 1967), especially in the<br />
ambient atmosphere where the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
carbon dioxide is low (see Chapter 12). However,<br />
since these early trials, very good progess is being<br />
made with photoautrophic shoot cultures and photoautotrophic<br />
micropropagation is now possible (Kozai,<br />
1991). Success is dependent on enriching the CO2<br />
concentrations in the vessels during the photoperiod,<br />
reducing or eliminating sugar from the medium, and<br />
optimising the in vitro environment.<br />
Nevertheless, for the normal culture <strong>of</strong> either<br />
cells, tissues or organs, it is necessary to incorporate a<br />
carbon source into the medium. Sucrose is almost<br />
universally used for micropropagation purposes as it<br />
is so generally utilisable by tissue cultures. Refined<br />
white domestic sugar is sufficiently pure for most<br />
practical purposes. <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> sucrose in tissue<br />
culture media specifically inhibits chlorophyll<br />
formation and photosynthesis (see below) making<br />
autotrophic growth less feasible.
3.2 ALTERNATIVES TO SUCROSE<br />
3.2.1. Other Sugars.<br />
<strong>The</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> sucrose as the most suitable<br />
energy source for cultures follows many comparisons<br />
between possible alternatives. Some <strong>of</strong> the first work<br />
<strong>of</strong> this kind on the carbohydrate nutrition <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
tissue was done by Gautheret (1945) using normal<br />
carrot tissue. Sucrose was found to be the best source<br />
<strong>of</strong> carbon followed by glucose, maltose and raffinose;<br />
fructose was less effective and mannose and lactose<br />
were the least suitable. <strong>The</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> this and other<br />
work is summarized in Table 4.2. Sucrose has almost<br />
invariably been found to be the best carbohydrate;<br />
glucose is generally found to support growth equally<br />
well, and in a few plants it may result in better in<br />
Chapter 4<br />
vitro growth than sucrose, or promote organogenesis<br />
where sucrose will not; but being more expensive<br />
than sucrose, glucose will only be preferred for<br />
micropropagation where it produces clearly<br />
advantageous results.<br />
Multiplication <strong>of</strong> Alnus crispa, A. cordata and A.<br />
rubra shoot cultures was best on glucose, while that<br />
<strong>of</strong> A. glutinosa was best on sucrose (Tremblay and<br />
Lalonde, 1984; Tremblay et al., 1984; Barghchi,<br />
1988). Direct shoot formation from Capsicum annum<br />
leaf discs in a 16 h day required the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
glucose (Phillips and Hubstenberger, 1985). Glucose<br />
is required for the culture <strong>of</strong> isolated roots <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
(Furguson, 1967) and some other monocotyledons<br />
(Bhojwani and Razdan, 1983).<br />
Table 4.2. <strong>The</strong> main sugars which can utilized by plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> as sugar for carbon nutrition is indicated by the size <strong>of</strong> the type.<br />
SUGAR Reducing Capacity Products <strong>of</strong> hydrolytic/enzymatic<br />
breakdown<br />
Monosaccharides<br />
Hexoses<br />
Glucose Reducing sugar None<br />
Fructose Reducing sugar None<br />
Galactose Reducing sugar None<br />
Mannose Reducing sugar None<br />
Pentoses<br />
Arabinose Slow reduction None<br />
Ribose Slow reduction None<br />
Xylose Slow reduction None<br />
Disaccharides<br />
Sucrose Non-reducing Glucose, fructose<br />
Maltose Reducing sugar Glucose<br />
Cellobiose Reducing sugar Glucose<br />
Trehalose Non-reducing Glucose<br />
Lactose Reducing sugar Glucose, fructose<br />
Trisaccharides<br />
Raffinose Non-reducing Glucose, galactose, fructose<br />
Some other monosaccharides such as arabinose<br />
and xylose; disaccharides such as cellobiose, maltose<br />
and trehalose; and some polysaccharides; all <strong>of</strong> which<br />
are capable <strong>of</strong> being broken down to glucose and<br />
fructose (Table 4.2), can also sometimes be used as<br />
partial replacements for sucrose (Straus and LaRue,<br />
1954; Sievert and Hildebrandt, 1965; Yatazawa et al.,<br />
1967; Smith and Stone, 1973; Minocha and Halperin,<br />
1974; Zaghmout and Torres, 1985). In Phaseolus<br />
callus, Jeffs and Northcote (1967) found that sucrose<br />
could be replaced by maltose and trehalose (all three<br />
sugars have an alpha-glucosyl radical at the nonreducing<br />
end), but not by glucose or fructose alone or<br />
125<br />
in combination, or by several other different sugars.<br />
Galactose has been said to be toxic to most plant<br />
tissues; it inhibits the growth <strong>of</strong> orchids and other<br />
plants in concentrations as low as 0.01% (0.9 mM)<br />
(Ernst et al., 1971; Arditti and Ernst, 1984).<br />
However, cells can become adapted and grown on<br />
galactose, e.g., sugar cane cells (Maretzski and<br />
Thom, 1978). <strong>The</strong> key was the induction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
enzyme galactose kinase, which converts galactose to<br />
galactose-1-phosphate. More recently, other reports<br />
on galactose use have appeared. It promoted callus<br />
growth in rugosa rose, but inhibited somatic<br />
embryogenesis (Kunitake et al., 1993). Galactose
126 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
promoted early somatic embryo maturation stages in<br />
European silver fir (Schuller and Reuther, 1993).<br />
When used instead <strong>of</strong> sucrose, it improved rooting <strong>of</strong><br />
Annona squamosa microshoots (Lemos and Blake,<br />
1996). In addition, galactose has been found to<br />
reduce or overcome hyperhydricity in shoot cultures<br />
(Druart, 1988; see Volume 2). Fructose has also been<br />
reported to be effective in preventing hyperhydricity<br />
(Rugini et al., 1987).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are some situations where fructose supports<br />
growth just as well as sucrose or glucose (Steffen<br />
et al., 1988) and occasionally it gives better results.<br />
Some orchid species have been reported to grow<br />
better on fructose than glucose (Ernst, 1967; Ernst<br />
et al., 1971; Arditti, 1979). Fructose was the best<br />
sugar for the production <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots from<br />
Glycine max cotyledonary nodes, especially if the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> nutrient salts supplied was<br />
inadequate (Wright et al., 1986). Shoot and leaf<br />
growth and axillary shoot formation in Castanea<br />
shoot cultures was stimulated when sucrose was<br />
replaced by 30 g/l fructose. <strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> basal<br />
callus was reduced and it was possible to propagate<br />
from mature explants <strong>of</strong> C. crenata, although this was<br />
not possible on the same medium supplemented with<br />
sucrose (Chauvin and Salesses, 1988). However,<br />
fructose was reported to be toxic to carrot tissue if, as<br />
the sole source <strong>of</strong> carbon, it was autoclaved with<br />
White (1943a) A medium. When filter sterilized,<br />
fructose supported the growth <strong>of</strong> callus cultures<br />
which had a final weight 70% <strong>of</strong> those grown on<br />
sucrose (Pollard et al., 1961).<br />
Sucrose in culture media is usually hydrolysed<br />
totally, or partially, into the component<br />
monosaccharides glucose and fructose (see below)<br />
and so it is logical to compare the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
combinations <strong>of</strong> these two sugars with that <strong>of</strong><br />
sucrose. Kromer and Kukulczanka (1985) found that<br />
meristem tips <strong>of</strong> Canna indica survived better on a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> 25 g/l glucose plus 5 g/l fructose, than on<br />
30 g/l sucrose. Germination <strong>of</strong> Paphiopedilum orchid<br />
seeds was best on a medium containing 5g/l fructose<br />
plus 5 g/l glucose; a mixture <strong>of</strong> 7.5 g/l <strong>of</strong> each sugar<br />
was optimal for further growth <strong>of</strong> the seedlings<br />
(Pierik et al., 1988). In spite <strong>of</strong> its rapid hydrolysis to<br />
glucose and fructose, sucrose appears to have a<br />
specific stimulatory effect on embryo development in<br />
Douglas fir, that was not observed when it was<br />
replaced by the monosaccharides (Taber et al., 1998).<br />
<strong>The</strong> general superiority <strong>of</strong> sucrose over glucose<br />
for the culture <strong>of</strong> organised plant tissues such as<br />
isolated roots may be on account <strong>of</strong> the more<br />
effective translocation <strong>of</strong> sucrose to apical meristems<br />
(Butcher and Street, 1964). In addition, there could<br />
be an osmotic effect, because, from an equal weight<br />
<strong>of</strong> compound, a solution <strong>of</strong> glucose has almost twice<br />
the molarity <strong>of</strong> a sucrose solution, and will thus, in<br />
the absence <strong>of</strong> inversion <strong>of</strong> the disaccharide, induce a<br />
more negative water potential (see below).<br />
Maltose. <strong>Plant</strong> species vary in their ability to<br />
utilise unusual sugars. For instance, although<br />
Gautheret (1945) could grow carrot callus on<br />
maltose, Mathes et al. (1973) obtained only minimal<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> Acer tissue on media supplemented with<br />
this sugar. Similarly, growth <strong>of</strong> soybean tissue on<br />
maltose is normally very slow, but variant strains <strong>of</strong><br />
cells have been selected which can utilise it (Limberg<br />
et al., 1979), perhaps because the new genotypes<br />
possessed an improved capacity for its active<br />
transport. Later studies have given a more prominent<br />
role to maltose as a component <strong>of</strong> tissue culture<br />
media. Maltose serves as both a carbon source and as<br />
an osmoticum. Compared to sucrose there is a slower<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> extracellular hydrolysis, it is taken up more<br />
slowly, and hydrolysed intracellularly more slowly.<br />
Maltose led to a substantial increase in somatic<br />
embryos from Petunia anthers (Raquin, 1983). It<br />
also led to an increase in callus induction and plantlet<br />
regeneration during in vitro androgenesis <strong>of</strong><br />
hexaploid winter triticale and wheat (Karsai et al.,<br />
1994). Maltose also increased callus induction in rice<br />
microspore culture, with an acceleration <strong>of</strong> initial cell<br />
divisions (Xie et al., 1995). For barley microspore<br />
culture, the inclusion <strong>of</strong> maltose led to a higher<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> green plants (Finnie et al., 1989).<br />
Maltose has been reported to equal or surpass sucrose<br />
in supporting embryogenesis in a number <strong>of</strong> species,<br />
including carrot (Verma and Dougall, 1977;<br />
Kinnersley and Henderson, 1988), alfalfa (Strickland<br />
et al., 1987), wild cherry (Reidiboym-Talleux et al.,<br />
1999), Malus (Daigny et al., 1996), Abies (Norgaard<br />
1997) and loblolly pine (Li et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong> number<br />
<strong>of</strong> plants regenerated from indica (Biswas and<br />
Zapata, 1993), and japonica (Jain et al., 1997) rice<br />
varieties was also greater when protoplasts were<br />
cultured with maltose rather than sucrose. Transfer<br />
from a medium containing sucrose or glucose to one<br />
supplemented with maltose has been used by Stuart<br />
et al. (1986) and Redenbaugh et al. (1987) to enhance<br />
the conversion <strong>of</strong> alfalfa embryos. Similarly, maltose<br />
led to a much higher germination rate from asparagus<br />
somatic embryos than sucrose (Kunitake et al., 1997).<br />
Lactose. <strong>The</strong> disaccharide lactose has been<br />
detected in only a few plants. When added to tissue
culture media it has been found to induce the activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> β-galactosidase enzyme which can be secreted into<br />
the medium. <strong>The</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> lactose to galactose<br />
and glucose then permits the growth <strong>of</strong> Nemesia<br />
strumosa and Petunia hybrida callus, cucumber<br />
suspensions (Hess et al., 1979; Callebaut and Motte,<br />
1988), cotton callus and cell suspensions (Mitchell<br />
et al., 1980), and Japanese morning glory callus<br />
(Hisajima and Thorpe, 1981). <strong>The</strong> key to lactose<br />
utilization in Japanese morning glory was not only<br />
the extracellular hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> this disaccharide, but<br />
the induction <strong>of</strong> galactose kinase, which prevented<br />
the accumulation <strong>of</strong> toxic galactose (Hisajima and<br />
Thorpe, 1985). Rodriguez and Lorenzo Martin<br />
(1987) found that adding 30 g/l lactose to MS<br />
medium instead <strong>of</strong> sucrose increased the number <strong>of</strong><br />
shoots produced by a Musa accuminata shoot culture,<br />
but no new shoots were produced on subsequent<br />
subculture, although they were when sucrose was<br />
present.<br />
In addition to lactose, plant cells have been shown<br />
to become adapted and then to grow on other<br />
galactose-containing oligosaccharides, including<br />
melibiose (Nickell and Maretzki, 1970; Gross et al.,<br />
1981), raffinose (Wright and Northcote, 1972;<br />
Thorpe and Laishley, 1974; Gross et al., 1981), and<br />
stachyose (Verma and Dougall, 1977; Gross et al.,<br />
1981).<br />
Corn syrups. Kinnersley and Henderson (1988)<br />
have shown that certain corn syrups can be used as<br />
carbon sources in plant culture media and that they<br />
may induce morphogenesis which is not provoked by<br />
supplementing with sucrose. Embryogenesis was<br />
induced in a 10-year old non-embryogenic cell line <strong>of</strong><br />
Daucus carota and plantlets were obtained from<br />
Nicotiana tabacum anthers by using syrups. Those<br />
used contained a mixture <strong>of</strong> glucose, maltose,<br />
maltotriose and higher polysaccharides. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />
stimulatory effect was reproduced by mixtures <strong>of</strong><br />
maltose and glucose.<br />
3.2.2. Sugar alcohols.<br />
Sugar alcohols were thought not usually to be<br />
metabolised by plant tissues and therefore<br />
unavailable as carbon sources. For this reason,<br />
mannitol and sorbitol have been frequently employed<br />
as osmotica to modify the water potential <strong>of</strong> a culture<br />
medium. In these circumstances, sufficient sucrose<br />
must also be present to supply the energy requirement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tissues. Adding either mannitol or sorbitol to<br />
the medium may make boron unavailable (See<br />
Chapter 3).<br />
Chapter 4<br />
127<br />
Mannitol was found to be metabolised by<br />
Fraxinus tissues (Wolter and Skoog, 1966). Later,<br />
studies with carrot and tobacco suspensions and<br />
cotyledon cultures <strong>of</strong> radiata pine showed that<br />
although mannitol was taken up very slowly, it was<br />
readily metabolized (Thompson et al., 1986). Thus,<br />
this sugat alcohol is only <strong>of</strong> value as a short-term<br />
osmotic agent. In contrast, sorbitol is readily taken<br />
up and metabolized in some species. It has been<br />
found to support the growth <strong>of</strong> apple callus (Chong<br />
and Taper, 1972, 1974a,b) and that <strong>of</strong> other rosaceous<br />
plants (C<strong>of</strong>fin et al., 1976), occasionally giving rise<br />
to more vigorous growth than can be obtained on<br />
sucrose. <strong>The</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> Rosaceae to use sorbitol as a<br />
carbon source is reported to be variety dependent.<br />
Albrecht (1986) found that shoot cultures <strong>of</strong> one<br />
crabapple variety required sorbitol for growth and<br />
would not grow on sucrose; another benefited from<br />
being grown on a mixture <strong>of</strong> sorbitol and sucrose and<br />
the growth <strong>of</strong> a third suffered if any sucrose was<br />
replaced by sorbitol. <strong>The</strong> apple rootstock ‘Ottawa 3’<br />
produced abnormal shoots on sorbitol (Chong and<br />
Pua, 1985). Evidence is accumulating to show that<br />
sugar alcohols generally exhibit non-osmotic roles in<br />
regulating morphogenesis and metabolism in plants<br />
that do not produce polyols as primary photosynthetic<br />
products (Steinitz, 1999). In addition to being<br />
metabolised to varying degrees in heterotrophic<br />
cultures, such as tobacco, maize, rice, citrus and<br />
chichory, sugar alcohols stimulate specific molecular<br />
and physiological responses, where they apparently<br />
act as chemical signals.<br />
<strong>The</strong> cyclic hexahydric alcohol myo-inositol does<br />
not seem to provide a source <strong>of</strong> energy (Smith and<br />
Stone, 1973) and its beneficial effect on the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
cultured tissues when used as a supplementary<br />
nutrient must depend on its participation in<br />
biosynthetic pathways (see vitamins above).<br />
3.2.3. Starch.<br />
<strong>Culture</strong>d cells <strong>of</strong> a few plants are able to utilise<br />
starch in the growth medium and appear to do so by<br />
release <strong>of</strong> extracellular amylases (Nickell and<br />
Burkholder, 1950). Growth rates <strong>of</strong> these cultures are<br />
increased by the addition <strong>of</strong> gibberellic acid, probably<br />
because it increases the synthesis or secretion <strong>of</strong><br />
amylase enzymes (Maretzki et al., 1971, 1974).<br />
3.3. HYDROLYSIS OF SUCROSE.<br />
<strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> this section on sugars is devoted<br />
to the apparent effects <strong>of</strong> sucrose concentration on<br />
cell differentiation and morphogenesis. Reports on
128 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
the subject should be tempered with the knowledge<br />
that some or all <strong>of</strong> the sucrose in the medium is liable<br />
to be broken down into its constituent hexose sugars,<br />
and that such inversion will also occur within plant<br />
tissues, where reducing sugar levels <strong>of</strong> at least 0.5 per<br />
cent are likely to occur (Helgeson et al., 1972).<br />
3.3.1. Autoclaving.<br />
A partial hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sucrose takes place during<br />
the autoclaving <strong>of</strong> media (Ball, 1953; Wolter and<br />
Skoog, 1966) the extent being greater when the<br />
compound is dissolved together with other medium<br />
constituents than when it is autoclaved in pure<br />
aqueous solution (Ferguson et al., 1958). In a fungal<br />
medium, not dissimilar to a plant culture medium,<br />
Bretzl<strong>of</strong>f (1954) found that sucrose inversion during<br />
autoclaving (15 min at 15 lbs/in 2 ) was dependent on<br />
pH in the following way:<br />
pH 3.0 100%<br />
pH 3.4 75%<br />
pH 3.8 40%<br />
pH 4.2 25%<br />
pH 4.7 12.5%<br />
pH 5.0 10%<br />
pH 6.0 0%<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
sucrose hydrolysed by autoclaving media at<br />
conventional pH levels (5.5-5.8) should be negligible.<br />
Most evidence suggests that this is not the case and<br />
that 10-15% sucrose can be converted into glucose<br />
and fructose. <strong>Culture</strong>s <strong>of</strong> some plants grow better in<br />
media containing autoclaved (rather than filtersterilised)<br />
sucrose (Ball, 1953; Guha and Johri, 1966;<br />
Johri and Guha, 1963; Verma and Van Huystee,<br />
1971; White, 1932) suggesting that the cells benefit<br />
from the availability <strong>of</strong> glucose and/or fructose.<br />
However, Nitsch and Nitsch (1956) noted that<br />
glucose only supported the growth <strong>of</strong> Helianthus<br />
callus if it had been autoclaved, and Romberger and<br />
Tabor (1971) that the growth <strong>of</strong> Picea shoot apices<br />
was less when the medium contained sucrose<br />
autoclaved separately in water (or sucrose autoclaved<br />
with only the organic constituents <strong>of</strong> the medium)<br />
than when all the constituents had been autoclaved<br />
together. <strong>The</strong>y suggested that a stimulatory<br />
substance might be released when sugars are<br />
autoclaved with agar.<br />
In other species there has been no difference<br />
between the growth <strong>of</strong> cultures supplied with<br />
autoclaved or filter sterilised sucrose (Mathes et al.,<br />
1973) or growth has been less on a medium<br />
containing autoclaved instead <strong>of</strong> filter sterilised<br />
sucrose (Stehsel and Caplin, 1969).<br />
3.3.2. Enzymatic breakdown.<br />
Sucrose in the medium is also inverted into<br />
monosaccharides during the in vitro culture <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
material. This occurs by the action <strong>of</strong> invertase<br />
located in the plant cell walls (Burstrom, 1957;<br />
Yoshida et al., 1973) or by the release <strong>of</strong> extracellular<br />
enzyme (King and Street, 1977). In most cultures,<br />
inversion <strong>of</strong> sucrose into glucose and fructose takes<br />
place in the medium; but, because the secretion <strong>of</strong><br />
invertase enzymes varies, the degree to which it<br />
occurs differs from one kind <strong>of</strong> plant to another.<br />
After 28 days on a medium containing either 3 or 4%<br />
sucrose, single explants <strong>of</strong> Hemerocallis and<br />
Delphinium had used 20-30% <strong>of</strong> the sugar. Of that<br />
which remained in the medium which had supported<br />
Hemerocallis, about 45% was sucrose, while only 5%<br />
was sucrose in the media in which Delphinium had<br />
been grown. In both cases the rest <strong>of</strong> the sucrose had<br />
been inverted (Lumsden et al., 1990).<br />
<strong>The</strong> sucrose-inverting capacity <strong>of</strong> tomato root<br />
cultures was greatest in media <strong>of</strong> pH 3.6-4.7.<br />
Activity sharply declined in less acid media (Weston<br />
and Street, 1968). Helgeson et al. (1972) found that<br />
omission <strong>of</strong> IAA auxin from the medium in which<br />
tobacco callus was cultured, caused there to be a<br />
marked rise in reducing sugar due to the progressive<br />
hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sucrose, both in the medium and in the<br />
tissue. A temporary increase in reducing sugars also<br />
occurred at the end <strong>of</strong> the lag phase when newly<br />
transferred callus pieces started to grow rapidly. It is<br />
interesting to note that cell wall invertase possessed<br />
catalytic activity in situ, whether or not tobacco tissue<br />
was grown on sucrose (Obata-Sasamoto and Thorpe,<br />
1983).<br />
In cultures <strong>of</strong> some species, uptake <strong>of</strong> sugar may<br />
depend on the prior extracellular hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sugar.<br />
This is the case in sugar cane (Komor et al., 1981);<br />
and possibly also in Dendrobium orchids (Hew et al.,<br />
1988) and carrot (Kanabus et al., 1986). Nearly all<br />
the sucrose in suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> sugar cane and<br />
sugar beet was hydrolysed in 3 days (Zamski and<br />
Wyse, 1985) and Daucus carota suspensions have<br />
been reported to hydrolyse all <strong>of</strong> the sucrose in the<br />
medium (Thorpe, 1982) into the constituent hexoses<br />
within 3 days (Kanabus et al., 1986) or within 24 h<br />
(Dijkema et al., 1990). However, most species can<br />
take up sucrose directly as was shown through studies<br />
with asymetrically labeled 14 C-sucrose (Parr and<br />
Edelman, 1975), and metabolise it intracellularly.<br />
Within the cell, soluble invertase, sucrose phosphate<br />
synthetase and sucrose synthetase serve to hydrolyse<br />
sucrose (Thorpe, 1982). Thus, in Acer (Copping and
Street, 1972) the soluble invertase activity paralleled<br />
growth rate, while in tobacco (Thorpe and Meier,<br />
1973) and Japanese morning glory (Hisajima et al.,<br />
1978) sucrose synthetase was more important. In the<br />
last species, the change in activity <strong>of</strong> sucrose<br />
synthetase was greater than that <strong>of</strong> sucrose phosphate<br />
synthetase, an enzyme not extensively examined in<br />
cultured cells.<br />
<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> shoots from non-dormant buds <strong>of</strong><br />
mulberry is not promoted by sucrose, only by<br />
maltose, glucose or fructose. Even though mulberry<br />
tissue hydrolysed sucrose into component<br />
monosaccharides, shoots did not develop. In the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> 3% fructose, sucrose was actually<br />
inhibitory to shoot development at concentrations as<br />
low as 0.2% (Oka and Ohyama, 1982).<br />
3.4. UPTAKE.<br />
<strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> sugar molecules into plant tissues<br />
appears to be partly through passive permeation and<br />
partly through active transport. <strong>The</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
mechanisms may vary. Active uptake is associated<br />
with the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> protons (H + ) from the<br />
medium. Charge compensation is effected by the<br />
excretion <strong>of</strong> a cation (H + or K + ) (Komor et al., 1977,<br />
1981). Glucose was taken up preferentially by carrot<br />
suspensions during the first 7 days <strong>of</strong> a 14 day<br />
passage; fructose uptake followed during days 7-9<br />
(Dijkema et al., 1990). At concentrations below 200<br />
mM, glucose was taken up more rapidly into<br />
strawberry fruit discs and protoplasts than either<br />
sucrose or fructose (Scott and Breen, 1988).<br />
3.5. EFFECTIVE CONCENTRATIONS.<br />
In most <strong>of</strong> the comparisons between the<br />
nutritional capabilities <strong>of</strong> sugars discussed above, the<br />
criterion <strong>of</strong> excellence has been the most rapid<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> unorganised callus or suspension-cultured<br />
cells. For this purpose 2-4% sucrose w/v is usually<br />
optimal. Similar concentrations are also used in<br />
media employed for micropropagation, but<br />
laboratories probably pay insufficient attention to the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> sucrose on morphogenesis (see below) and<br />
plantlet development. Sucrose levels in culture<br />
media which result in good callus growth may not be<br />
optimal for morphogenesis, and either lower or<br />
higher levels may be more effective.<br />
<strong>The</strong> optimum concentration <strong>of</strong> sucrose to induce<br />
morphogenesis or growth differs between different<br />
genotypes, sometimes even between those which are<br />
closely related. For instance, Damiano et al. (1987)<br />
found that the concentration <strong>of</strong> sucrose necessary to<br />
Chapter 4<br />
129<br />
produce the best rate <strong>of</strong> shoot proliferation in<br />
Eucalyptus gunnii shoot cultures varied between<br />
clones. <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> sucrose concentration on<br />
direct shoot formation from Chrysanthemum explants<br />
varied with plant cultivar (Fig 4.1).<br />
Experiments <strong>of</strong> Molnar (1988) have shown that<br />
the optimum level <strong>of</strong> sucrose may depend upon the<br />
other amendments added to a culture medium. <strong>The</strong><br />
most rapid growth <strong>of</strong> Brassica nigra suspensions on<br />
one containing MS salts (but less iron and B5<br />
vitamins) occurred when 2% sucrose was added.<br />
However, when it was supplemented with 1-4 g/l<br />
casein hydrolysate or a mixture <strong>of</strong> 3 defined amino<br />
acids, growth was increased on up to 6% sucrose. A<br />
similar result was obtained if, instead <strong>of</strong> the amino<br />
acids, 15 mM sodium succinate was added. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
was an extended growth period and the harvested dry<br />
weight <strong>of</strong> the culture was 2.8 times that on the<br />
original medium with 2% sucrose.<br />
<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> sucrose in the medium may have a<br />
direct effect on the type <strong>of</strong> morphogenesis. Thus,<br />
sucrose (87 mM) favored organogenesis, while a<br />
higher level (350 mM) favoured somatic<br />
embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong><br />
sunflower (Jeannin et al., 1995). In vitro minicrowns<br />
<strong>of</strong> asparagus developed short, thickened storage roots<br />
at high frequencies when the sucrose concentration in<br />
the medium was increased to 6% (Conner and<br />
Falloon, 1993). Lower sucrose concentrations, even<br />
with the addition <strong>of</strong> non- or poorly metabolised<br />
carbohydrates, such as cellobiose, maltose, mannose,<br />
melibiose and sorbitol produced thin fibrous roots,<br />
indicating that the additional sucrose was nutritional<br />
rather than osmotic.<br />
<strong>The</strong> respiration rate <strong>of</strong> cultured plant tissues rises<br />
as the concentration <strong>of</strong> added sucrose or glucose is<br />
increased. In wheat callus, it was found to reach a<br />
maximum when 90 g/1 (0.263 M) was added to the<br />
medium, even though 20 g/l produced the highest rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> growth and number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots (Galiba<br />
and Erdei, 1986). <strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> inorganic ions can<br />
be dependent on sugar concentration and the benefit<br />
<strong>of</strong> adding increased quantities <strong>of</strong> nutrients to a<br />
medium may not be apparent unless the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
sugar is increased at the same time (Gamborg et al.,<br />
1974).<br />
3.5.1. Cell differentiation<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> vascular elements. Although<br />
sugars are clearly involved in the differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />
xylem and phloem elements in cultured cells, it is still<br />
uncertain whether they have a regulatory role apart<br />
from providing a carbon energy source necessary for
130 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
active cell metabolism. Sucrose is generally required<br />
to be present in addition to IAA before tracheid<br />
elements are differentiated in tissue cultures. <strong>The</strong><br />
number <strong>of</strong> both sieve and xylem elements formed<br />
[and possibly the proportion <strong>of</strong> each kind - Wetmore<br />
and Rier (1963); Rier and Beslow (1967)] depends on<br />
sucrose concentration (Aloni, 1980). In Helianthus<br />
tuberosus tuber slices, although sucrose, glucose and<br />
trehalose were best for supporting cell division and<br />
tracheid formation, maltose was only a moderately<br />
effective carbon source (Minocha and Halperin,<br />
1974). Shininger (1979) has concluded that only<br />
carbohydrates which enable significant cell division<br />
are capable <strong>of</strong> promoting tracheary element<br />
formation. <strong>The</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> lignin in cultured cells<br />
is not invariably associated with thickened cell walls.<br />
Sycamore suspension cultures produced large<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> lignin when grown on a medium with<br />
abnormally high sucrose (more than 6%) and 2,4-D<br />
levels. It was deposited within the cells and released<br />
into the medium (Carceller et al., 1971).<br />
Fig. 4.1 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> sucrose concentration on direct adventitious shoot formation from flower pedicels <strong>of</strong> two chrysanthemum cultivars<br />
[from data <strong>of</strong> Roest and Bokelmann, 1975].<br />
Chlorophyll formation. Levels <strong>of</strong> sucrose<br />
normally used to support the growth <strong>of</strong> tissue cultures<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten inhibitory to chlorophyll synthesis (Rier and<br />
Chen, 1964; Edelman and Hanson, 1972) but the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> inhibition does vary according to the<br />
species <strong>of</strong> plant from which the tissue was derived.<br />
In experiments <strong>of</strong> Hildebrandt et al. (1963) and<br />
Fukami and Hildebrandt (1967) for example, carrot<br />
and rose callus had a high chlorophyll content on<br />
Hildebrandt et al. (1946) tobacco medium with 2-8%<br />
sucrose; but tissue <strong>of</strong> endive, lettuce and spinach only<br />
produced large amounts <strong>of</strong> the pigment on a medium<br />
with no added sucrose (although a small amount <strong>of</strong><br />
sugar was probably supplied by 15-16% coconut<br />
milk).<br />
Cymbidium protocorms contain high chlorophyll<br />
levels only if they are cultured on media containing<br />
0.2-0.5% sucrose. <strong>The</strong>ir degree <strong>of</strong> greening declines<br />
rapidly when they are grown on sucrose<br />
concentrations higher than this (Vanséveren-Van<br />
Espen, 1973). Likewise, orchid protocorm-like<br />
bodies will not become green and cannot develop into<br />
plantlets if sucrose is present in the medium beyond<br />
the stage <strong>of</strong> their differentiation from the explants.<br />
Where added sucrose does reduce chlorophyll<br />
formation, it is thought that the synthesis <strong>of</strong> 5aminolaevulinic<br />
acid (ALA - a precursor <strong>of</strong> the<br />
porphyrin molecules <strong>of</strong> which chlorophyll is<br />
composed) is reduced due to an inhibition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the enzyme ALA synthase (Pamplin and
Chapman, 1975). Sugars apart from sucrose are not<br />
inhibitory (Edelman and Hanson, 1972; El Hinnawiy,<br />
1974). It has been said that cells grown on sucrose<br />
for prolonged periods may permanently lose the<br />
ability to synthesise chlorophyll (Van Huystee,<br />
1977). Plastids become converted to amyloplasts<br />
packed with starch and this may change the<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> plastid DNA (Gunning and Steer, 1975)<br />
or result in a reduction <strong>of</strong> plastid RNA (Rosner et al.,<br />
1977).<br />
A small amount <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis may be carried<br />
out by cultured shoots providing they are not<br />
maintained on media containing a high concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> sucrose. Photosynthesis increased in Rosa shoot<br />
cultures when they were grown initially on 20 or 40<br />
g/l sucrose which was decreased to 10 g/l in<br />
successive subcultures (Langford and Wainwright,<br />
1987). An increase in photosynthesis occurs when<br />
sucrose is omitted from the medium in which rooted<br />
plantlets are growing (Short et al., 1987), but these<br />
treatments are not successful in ensuring a greater<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> plantlets when they are transferred extra<br />
vitrum. A more recent study also showed the relative<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> autotrophic and heterotrophic carbon<br />
metabolism in cultured potato plants (Wolf et al.,<br />
1998). With 8% sucrose in the medium 90% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tissue carbon was <strong>of</strong> heterotrophic origin in lightgrown<br />
plants; while on 3% sucrose, only 50% was <strong>of</strong><br />
heterotrophic origin.<br />
3.6 STARCH ACCUMULATION AND MORPHOGSNESIS<br />
3.6.1. Starch deposition preceeding morphogenesis.<br />
Cells <strong>of</strong> callus and suspension cultures commonly<br />
accumulate starch in their plastids and it is<br />
particularly prevalent in cells at the stationary phase.<br />
Starch in cells <strong>of</strong> rice suspensions had different<br />
chemical properties to that in the endosperm <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
(Landry and Smyth, 1988). In searching for features<br />
which might be related to later morphogenetic events<br />
in Nicotiana callus, Murashige and co-workers<br />
(Murashige and Nakano, 1968; Thorpe and<br />
Murashige, 1968a, b) noticed that starch accumulated<br />
preferentially in cells sited where shoot primordia<br />
ultimately formed. <strong>The</strong> starch is produced from<br />
sucrose supplied in the culture medium (Thorpe et al.,<br />
1986). As a result <strong>of</strong> this work, it was suggested that<br />
starch accumulation might be a prerequisite <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenesis. In tobacco, starch presumably acts<br />
as a direct cellular reserve <strong>of</strong> the energy required for<br />
morphogenesis, because it disappears rapidly as<br />
meristenoids and shoot primordia are formed (Thorpe<br />
and Meier, 1974, 1975). Morphogenesis is an<br />
Chapter 4<br />
131<br />
energy-demanding process and callus maintained on<br />
a shoot-inducing medium does have a greater<br />
respiration rate than similar tissue kept on a noninductive<br />
medium (Thorpe and Murashige, 1970;<br />
Thorpe and Meier, 1972). Organ-forming callus <strong>of</strong><br />
tobacco has been found to accumulate starch prior to<br />
shoot or root formation, whereas callus not capable <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenesis did not do so (Kavi Kishor and<br />
Mehta, 1982).<br />
3.6.2. Morphogenesis without starch deposition<br />
Cells <strong>of</strong> other plants which become committed to<br />
initiate organs do not necessarily accumulate starch<br />
as a preliminary to morphogenesis and it seems likely<br />
that the occurrence <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon is speciesrelated.<br />
<strong>The</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> starch was observed as an<br />
early manifestation <strong>of</strong> organogenesis in Pinus<br />
coulteri embryos (Patel and Berlyn, 1983), but not in<br />
those <strong>of</strong> Picea abies (Von Arnold, 1987). Although<br />
zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> the latter species immediately<br />
began to accumulate starch (particularly in the<br />
chloroplasts <strong>of</strong> cells in the cortex) when they were<br />
placed on a medium containing sucrose. It was never<br />
observed in meristematic cells from which<br />
adventitious buds developed (Von Arnold, 1987).<br />
However, if a major role for the accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />
starch prior to the initiation <strong>of</strong> organized development<br />
is for energy production, this role would be satisfied<br />
by the lipid reserves in zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> conifers<br />
(Thorpe, 1982). Indeed, the rapid and nearly linear<br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> triglycerides during the period <strong>of</strong> high<br />
respiration during shoot initiation in excised<br />
cotyledons <strong>of</strong> radiata pine (Biondi and Thorpe, 1982;<br />
Douglas et al., 1982) would support this view.<br />
Meristematic centres in bulb scales <strong>of</strong> Nerine<br />
bowdenii can be detected as groups <strong>of</strong> cells from<br />
which starch is absent (Grootaarts et al., 1981).<br />
Starch was not accumulated in caulogenic callus <strong>of</strong><br />
Rosa persica x R. xanthina initiated from recentlyinitiated<br />
shoot cultures, but cells did accumulate<br />
starch when the shoot forming capacity <strong>of</strong> the callus<br />
was lost after more than three passages (Lloyd et al.,<br />
1988). Callus derived from barley embryos was<br />
noted to accumulate starch very rapidly and this was<br />
accompanied by a reduction in osmotic pressure<br />
within the cells (Granatek and Cockerline, 1978).<br />
Gibberellic acid, which in this plant could be used to<br />
induce shoot formation, brought about an increase in<br />
cell osmolarity.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are some further examples where a<br />
diminution <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> stored carbohydrate in<br />
cultured tissues has restored or improved their
132 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
organogenetic capacity. A salt-tolerant line <strong>of</strong> alfalfa<br />
cells which showed no ability for shoot regeneration<br />
after three and a half years in culture on 3% sucrose<br />
was induced to form shoots and plantlets by being<br />
cultured for one passage <strong>of</strong> 24 days on 1% sucrose,<br />
before being returned to a medium containing 3%<br />
sucrose and a high 2,4-D level (Rains et al., 1980,<br />
and personal communication). Cells which in 3%<br />
sucrose were full <strong>of</strong> starch became starch-depleted<br />
during culture on a lower sucrose level. <strong>The</strong> number<br />
<strong>of</strong> somatic embryos formed by embryogenic<br />
‘Shamouti’ orange callus, was increased when<br />
sucrose was omitted from the medium for one<br />
passage, before being returned to Murashige and<br />
Tucker (1969) medium with 5-6% sucrose (Kochba<br />
and Button, 1974).<br />
3.6.3. Unusual sugars<br />
In some plants, unusual sugars are able to regulate<br />
morphogenesis and differentiation. Galactose stimulates<br />
embryogenesis in Citrus cultures (Kochba et al.,<br />
1978) and can enhance the maturation <strong>of</strong> alfalfa<br />
embryos. Callus <strong>of</strong> Cucumis sativus grew most<br />
rapidly on raffinose and was capable <strong>of</strong> forming roots<br />
when grown on this sugar; somatic embryos were<br />
only differentiated when the callus was cultured on<br />
sucrose (88-175 mM), but if a small amount <strong>of</strong><br />
stachyose (0.3 mM) was added to 88 mM sucrose the<br />
callus produced adventitious shoots instead (Kim and<br />
Janick, 1989). Stachyose is the major translocated<br />
carbohydrate in cucurbits.<br />
4. OSMOTIC EFFECT OF MEDIA INGREDIENTS<br />
Besides having a purely nutritive effect, solutions<br />
<strong>of</strong> inorganic salts and sugars, which compose tissue<br />
culture media, influence plant cell growth through<br />
their osmotic properties. A discussion is most<br />
conveniently accommodated at this point, as many <strong>of</strong><br />
the papers published on the subject stress the osmotic<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> added sugars.<br />
4.1. OSMOTIC AND WATER POTENTIALS: A GENERAL<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Water movement into and out <strong>of</strong> a plant cell is<br />
governed by the relative concentrations <strong>of</strong> dissolved<br />
substances in the external and internal solutions, and<br />
by the pressure exerted by its restraining cell wall.<br />
<strong>The</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> defining the respective forces has<br />
changed in recent years, and as both old and new<br />
terminology are found in the tissue culture literature,<br />
the following brief description may assist the reader.<br />
More detailed explanations can be found in many text<br />
books on plant physiology.<br />
In the older concept, cells were considered to take<br />
up water by suction (i.e. by exerting a negative<br />
pressure) induced by the osmotically active<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> dissolved substances within the cell.<br />
<strong>The</strong> suction force or suction pressure (SP) was<br />
defined as that resulting from the osmotic pressure <strong>of</strong><br />
the cell sap (OPcs) minus the osmotic pressure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
external solution (OPext), and the pressure exerted on,<br />
and stretching the cell wall, turgor pressure (TP) - so<br />
called because it is at a maximum when the cells are<br />
turgid. This may be represented by the equations:<br />
SP = (OPcs - OPext) – TP or<br />
SP = OPcs - (OPext + TP).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se definitions devised by botanists, are not<br />
satisfactory thermodynamically because water should<br />
be considered to move down an energy gradient,<br />
losing energy as it does so. <strong>The</strong> term water potential<br />
(Ψ - Greek capital letter psi) is now used, and<br />
solutions <strong>of</strong> compounds in water are said to exert an<br />
osmotic potential. As the potential <strong>of</strong> pure water is<br />
defined as being zero, and dissolved substances cause<br />
it to be reduced, solutions have osmotic potentials, Ψs<br />
(or Ψπ - Greek small letter pi) which are negative in<br />
value. Water is said to move from a region <strong>of</strong> high<br />
potential (having a less negative value) to one that is<br />
lower (having a more negative value). Both osmotic<br />
pressure and osmotic potential are used as terms in<br />
tissue culture literature and are equivalent except that<br />
they are opposite in sign (i.e. an OP <strong>of</strong> +6 bar equals<br />
a Ψs <strong>of</strong> -6 bar). <strong>The</strong>rmodynamically, the cell’s turgor<br />
pressure is defined as a positive pressure potential<br />
(Ψp). <strong>The</strong> water potential <strong>of</strong> a cell (Ψcell ) is then<br />
equal to the sum <strong>of</strong> its osmotic and pressure<br />
potentials plus the force holding water in<br />
microcapillaries or bound to the cell wall matrix<br />
(Ψm):<br />
Ψ cell = Ψs + Ψp + Ψm<br />
Modern statements <strong>of</strong> the older suction pressure<br />
concept are therefore that the difference in water<br />
potential (i.e. the direction <strong>of</strong> water movement)<br />
between a cell and solution outside is given by:<br />
ΔΨ = (Ψsinside cell – Ψsoutside cell) – Ψp or<br />
ΔΨ = Ψ cell – Ψπoutside<br />
and when ΔΨ = 0 (at equilibrium)<br />
Ψπoutside = Ψ cell<br />
<strong>The</strong> force <strong>of</strong> water movement between two cells, `
‘A’ and ‘B’, <strong>of</strong> different water potential, is given<br />
by:<br />
ΔΨ = Ψ cellA – ΨcellB<br />
the direction <strong>of</strong> movement being towards the<br />
more negative water potential.<br />
<strong>The</strong> osmotic potential (pressure) <strong>of</strong> solutions is<br />
determined by their molar concentration and by<br />
temperature. <strong>The</strong> water potential <strong>of</strong> a plant tissue<br />
culture medium (Ψtcm) is equivalent to the osmotic<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> the dissolved compounds (Ψs). <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
no pressure potential but, if they are added,<br />
substances such as agar and Gelrite contribute a<br />
matric potential (Ψm):<br />
Ψtcm = Ψs + Ψm<br />
Osmotic pressure and water potential are<br />
measured in standard pressure units thus:<br />
1 bar = 0.987 atm<br />
= 10 6 dynes cm –2<br />
= 10 5 Pa (0.1 MPa = 1 bar).<br />
Whereas molarity is defined as number <strong>of</strong> gram<br />
moles <strong>of</strong> a substance in one litre <strong>of</strong> a solution (i.e. one<br />
litre <strong>of</strong> solution requires less than one litre <strong>of</strong><br />
solvent), molality is the number <strong>of</strong> gram moles <strong>of</strong><br />
solute per kilogram <strong>of</strong> solvent, and thus, unlike<br />
osmotic potential (osmolality, measured in pressure<br />
units) is independent <strong>of</strong> temperature. It is therefore<br />
more convenient to give measurements <strong>of</strong> osmotic<br />
pressure in osmolality units. <strong>The</strong> osmole (Osm) is<br />
defined as:<br />
<strong>The</strong> unit <strong>of</strong> the osmolality <strong>of</strong> a solution exerting<br />
an osmotic pressure equal to that <strong>of</strong> an ideal nondissociating<br />
substance which has a concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> one mole <strong>of</strong> solute per kilogram <strong>of</strong> solvent.<br />
<strong>The</strong> osmolality <strong>of</strong> a very dilute solution <strong>of</strong> a<br />
substance which does not dissociate into ions, will be<br />
the same as its molality (i.e. g moles per kilogram <strong>of</strong><br />
solvent). <strong>The</strong> osmolality <strong>of</strong> a weak solution <strong>of</strong> a salt,<br />
Chapter 4<br />
or salts, which has completely dissociated into ions,<br />
will equal that <strong>of</strong> the total molality <strong>of</strong> the ions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> dilute solutions<br />
approximates to Van’t H<strong>of</strong>f’s equation: Ψ = -cRT;<br />
where<br />
c = concentration <strong>of</strong> solutes in mol/litre;<br />
R = the gas constant and<br />
T = temperature in °K<br />
From the above equation, at 0°C one litre <strong>of</strong> a<br />
solution containing 1 mole <strong>of</strong> an undissociated<br />
compound, or 1 mole <strong>of</strong> ions, could be expected to<br />
have an osmolality <strong>of</strong> 1 Osm/kg, and an osmotic<br />
(water) potential <strong>of</strong>:<br />
Ψ= -1 (mole) x 0.082054 (atm /mole/°C)<br />
x 273.16 (°K) = - 22.414 atm<br />
Thus, although in practice the Van’t H<strong>of</strong>f<br />
equation must be corrected by the osmotic<br />
coefficient, Φ:<br />
Ψ = − Φ cRT (Lang, 1967),<br />
it is possible to give approximate figures for<br />
converting osmolality into osmotic potential pressure<br />
units. <strong>The</strong>se are shown in Table 4.3. This table can<br />
also be used to estimate the osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> nondissociating<br />
molecules such as sugars or mannitol.<br />
Thus at 25°C, 30 g/l sucrose (molecular wt. 342.3)<br />
should exert an osmotic potential <strong>of</strong>:<br />
30<br />
-2.4789 x = −0.217 MPa<br />
342.<br />
3<br />
<strong>The</strong> observed potential is -0.223 Mpa (Table 4.4).<br />
A definition. <strong>The</strong> osmotic properties <strong>of</strong> solutions<br />
can be difficult to describe without confusion. In this<br />
book, the addition <strong>of</strong> solutes to a solvent (which<br />
makes the osmotic or water potential more negative,<br />
but makes the osmolality <strong>of</strong> the solution increase to a<br />
larger positive value), has been said to reduce<br />
Table 4.3 Factors by which osmolality (Osm/kg) should be multiplied to estimate an equivalent osmotic potential<br />
in pressure units.<br />
Multiply Osm/kg by the factor shown for an equivalent osmotic potential in<br />
pressure units 1<br />
For<br />
conversion to<br />
15 ºC 20 ºC 0 ºC 25 ºC 30 ºC<br />
Atm -22.414 -23.645 -24.055 -24.465 -24.875<br />
Bar -22.711 -23.958 -24.374 -24.789 -25.205<br />
Dyne/cm 2<br />
-22.711<br />
x 10 6<br />
-23.958<br />
x 10 6<br />
-24.374<br />
x 10 6<br />
-24.789<br />
x 10 6<br />
-25.205<br />
x 10 6<br />
Mpa -2.2711 -2.3958 -2.4374 -2.4789 -2.5205<br />
* Divide pressure units by the figures shown to find approximate osmolality,<br />
-223<br />
e.g. − 223 kPa =<br />
1000<br />
x<br />
1<br />
- 2.<br />
4789<br />
= 0.090 Osm/kg.<br />
133
134 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
Table 4.4 <strong>The</strong> osmolality and osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> sucrose solutions at different concentrations.<br />
Sucrose concentration Osmolality Osmotic potential at<br />
(% , w/v) (mM) (Osm/kg) 25 ºC (MPa)<br />
0.5 14.61 0.015 -0.037<br />
1.0 29.21 0.030 -0.074<br />
1.5 43.82 0.045 -0.112<br />
2.0 58.43 0.060 -0.149<br />
2.5 73.04 0.075 -0.186<br />
3.0 87.64 0.090 -0.223<br />
4.0 116.86 0.121 -0.300<br />
5.0 175.28 0.186 -0.461<br />
6.0 233.71 0.253 -0.627<br />
8.0 292.14 0.324 -0.803<br />
10.0 350.57 0.396 -0.982<br />
(decrease) the osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> solutions. MS<br />
medium containing 3% sucrose (osmolality, ca. 186<br />
mOsm/kg; ca. -461 kPa at 25°C) is thus described as<br />
having a lower water potential than the medium <strong>of</strong><br />
White (1954) supplemented with 2% sucrose<br />
(osmolality, ca. 78 mOsm/kg; ca. −193 kPa at 25°C).<br />
4.2. THE OSMOTIC POTENTIAL OF TISSUE CULTURE<br />
MEDIA<br />
4.2.1. <strong>The</strong> total osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> solutes<br />
<strong>The</strong> approximate total osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> a<br />
medium due to dissolved substances, can be<br />
estimated from: Ψs = Ψsmacronutrients + Ψssugars<br />
When 3% w/v sucrose is added to Murashige and<br />
Skoog (1962) medium, the osmolality <strong>of</strong> a filter<br />
sterilised preparation rises from 0.096 to 0.186<br />
Osm/kg and at 25°C, the osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medium decreases from -0.237 to -0.460 MPa.<br />
Sugars are thus responsible for much <strong>of</strong> the osmotic<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> normal plant culture media. Even<br />
without any inversion to monosaccharides, the<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> 3% w/v sucrose is responsible for over four<br />
fifths <strong>of</strong> the total osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> White (1954)<br />
medium, 60% <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Schenk and Hildebrandt<br />
(1972), and for just under one half that <strong>of</strong> MS.<br />
<strong>The</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> the gelling agent. <strong>The</strong> water<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> media solidified with gels is more<br />
negative than that <strong>of</strong> a liquid medium, due to their<br />
matric potential, but this component is probably<br />
relatively small (Amador and Stewart, 1987). In the<br />
following sections, the matric potential <strong>of</strong> semi-solid<br />
media containing ca. 6 g/l agar has been assumed to<br />
be -0.01 MPa at 25°C, but as adding extra agar to<br />
media helps to prevent hyperhydricity, it is possible<br />
that this is an underestimate.<br />
<strong>The</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> nutrient salts. Inorganic salts<br />
dissociate into ions when they are dissolved in water,<br />
so that the water potential <strong>of</strong> their solutions<br />
(especially weak solutions) does not depend on the<br />
molality (or molarity) <strong>of</strong> undissociated compounds,<br />
but on the molality (or molarity) <strong>of</strong> their ions. Thus a<br />
solution <strong>of</strong> KCl with a molality <strong>of</strong> 0.1, will have a<br />
theoretical osmolality <strong>of</strong> 0.2, because in solution it<br />
dissociates into 0.1 mole K + and 0.1 mole Cl – .<br />
Osmolality <strong>of</strong> a solution <strong>of</strong> mixed salts is dependent<br />
on the total molality <strong>of</strong> ions in solution.<br />
Dissociation may not be complete, especially<br />
when several different compounds are dissolved<br />
together as in plant culture media, which is a further<br />
reason why calculated predictions <strong>of</strong> water potential<br />
may be imprecise. In practice, osmotic potentials<br />
should be determined by actual measurement with an<br />
osmometer. Clearly though, osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> a<br />
culture medium is related to the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
solutes, particularly that <strong>of</strong> the macronutrients and<br />
sugar.<br />
Of the inorganic salts in nutrient media, the<br />
macronutrients contribute most to the final osmotic<br />
(water) potential because <strong>of</strong> their greater<br />
concentration. <strong>The</strong> osmolality <strong>of</strong> these relatively<br />
dilute solutions is very similar to the total osmolarity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the constituent ions at 0°C, and can therefore be<br />
estimated from the total molarity <strong>of</strong> the macronutrient<br />
ions. Thus based on its macronutrient composition, a<br />
liquid Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium (without<br />
sugar) with a total macronutrient ion concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
95.75 mM, will have an osmolality <strong>of</strong> ca. 0.0958<br />
osmoles (Osm) per kilogram <strong>of</strong> water solvent (95.8<br />
mOsm/kg), at 25°C, an osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> ca. -<br />
0.237 MPa (237 kPa). Estimates <strong>of</strong> osmolality
derived in this way agree closely to actual<br />
measurements <strong>of</strong> osmolality or osmolarity for named<br />
media given in the papers <strong>of</strong> Yoshida et al. (1973),<br />
Kavi Kishor and Reddy (1986) and Lazzeri et al.<br />
(1988) (see Table 4.5).<br />
<strong>The</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> sugars. <strong>The</strong> osmolality and<br />
osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> sucrose solutions can be read<br />
from Table 4.6. Those <strong>of</strong> mannitol and sorbitol<br />
solutions <strong>of</strong> equivalent molarities will be<br />
approximately comparable. At concentrations up to<br />
3% w/v, the osmolality <strong>of</strong> sucrose is close to<br />
molarity. It will be seen that the osmotic potential (in<br />
MPa) <strong>of</strong> sucrose solutions at 25°C can be roughly<br />
estimated by multiplying the % weight/volume<br />
concentration by -0.075: that <strong>of</strong> the monosaccharides<br />
fructose, glucose, mannitol and sorbitol (which have<br />
a molecular weight approximately 0.52 times that <strong>of</strong><br />
sucrose), by multiplying by -0.14.<br />
If any <strong>of</strong> the sucrose in a medium becomes<br />
hydrolysed into monosaccharides, the osmotic<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> the combined sugar components (sucrose<br />
+ glucose + fructose), (Ψssugars), will be lower (more<br />
negative) than would be estimated from Table 4.5.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect can be seen in Table 4.6. From this data it<br />
seems that 40-50% <strong>of</strong> the sucrose added to MS<br />
medium by Lazzeri et al. (1988) was broken down<br />
into monosaccharides during autoclaving. Hydrolysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> sucrose by plant-derived invertase enzymes will<br />
also have a similar effect on osmotic potential. In<br />
some suspension cultures, all sucrose remaining in<br />
the medium is inverted within 24 h. A fully inverted<br />
sucrose solution would have almost double the<br />
negative potential <strong>of</strong> the original solution, but as the<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> glucose and fructose by enzymatic<br />
hydrolysis usually occurs concurrently with the<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> sugars by the tissues, it will tend to have a<br />
stabilizing effect on osmotic potential during the<br />
passage <strong>of</strong> a culture. Reported measurements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Chapter 4<br />
osmolality <strong>of</strong> MS medium containing 3% sucrose,<br />
after autoclaving, are:<br />
230 mOsm/kg (0.65% Phytagar; Lazzeri et al.,<br />
1988)<br />
240 ± 20 mOsm/kg (0.6-0.925% agar; Scherer<br />
et al., 1988)<br />
230 ± 50 mOsm/kg (0.2-0.4% Gelrite; Scherer<br />
et al., 1988)<br />
4.2.2. Decreasing osmotic potential with other<br />
osmotica<br />
By adding soluble substances in place <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong><br />
the sugar in a medium, it can be shown that sugars<br />
not only act as a carbohydrate source, but also as<br />
osmoregulants. Osmotica employed for the<br />
deliberate modification <strong>of</strong> osmotic potential, should<br />
be largely lacking other biological effects. Those<br />
most frequently selected are the sugar alcohols<br />
mannitol and sorbitol. It is assumed that plants that<br />
do not have a native pathway for sugar alcohol<br />
biosynthesis are also deficient in pathways to<br />
assimilate them. Sugar alcohols, though, are usually<br />
translocated, and may be metabolised and utilized to<br />
various degrees (Steinitz, 1999; for mannitol<br />
Lipavska and Vreugedenhil, 1996 Tian and Russell,<br />
1999; for sorbitol Pua et al., 1984). Polyethylene<br />
glycol may be more helpful as an inert<br />
nonpenetrating osmolyte although it may contain<br />
toxic contaminants (Chazen et al., 1995). Mannitol<br />
can easily penetrate cell walls, but the plasmalemma<br />
is considered to be relatively impermeable to it<br />
(Rains, 1989), whereas high-molecular-weight<br />
polyethylene glycol 4000 is too large to penetrate cell<br />
walls (Carpita et al., 1979; Rains, 1989). Thus, a<br />
nonpenetrating osmolyte cannot penetrate into the<br />
plant cells, but inhibits water uptake. Sodium<br />
sulphate and sodium chloride have also been used in<br />
some experiments.<br />
Table 4.5. Predicted osmolality and the osmolality actually observed after autoclaving (data from Lazzeri et al., 1988).<br />
Predicted osmolality<br />
(no sucrose hydrolysis)<br />
Oberved total<br />
Salts Agar Sucrose Total osmolality<br />
(mOsm/kg) (mOsm/kg) (mOsm/kg) (mOsm/kg) (mOsm/kg)<br />
MS + agar 96 4 - 100 -<br />
MS + agar + 0.5% sucrose 96 4 15 115 115<br />
MS + agar + 1.0% sucrose 96 4 30 130 140<br />
MS + agar + 2.0% sucrose 96 4 60 160 184†<br />
MS + agar + 4.0% sucrose<br />
† 161 mOsm/kg by Brown et al. (1989)<br />
96 4 121 221 276<br />
135
136 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
Table 4.6. <strong>The</strong> osmolality and osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> sucrose solutions <strong>of</strong> different concentrations.<br />
Sucrose Concentration Osmolality Osmotic potential at<br />
25°C<br />
(% w/v) mM Osm/Kg MPa<br />
0.5 14.61 0.015 -0.037<br />
1.0 29.21 0.030 -0.074<br />
1.5 43.82 0.045 -0.112<br />
2.0 58.43 0.060 -0.149<br />
2.5 73.04 0.075 -0.186<br />
3.0 87.64 0.090 -0.223<br />
4.0 116.86 0.121 -0.300<br />
6.0 175.28 0.186 -0.461<br />
8.0 233.71 0.253 -0.627<br />
10.0 292.14 0.324 -0.803<br />
12.0 350.57 0.396 -0.982<br />
4.3. EFFECTS AND USES OF OSMOLYTES IN TISSUE<br />
CULTURE MEDIA<br />
4.3.1. Protoplast isolation and culture<br />
<strong>The</strong> osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> a plant cell is counterbalanced<br />
by the pressure potential exerted by the cell<br />
wall. To safely remove the cell wall during<br />
protoplast isolation without damaging the plasma<br />
membrane, it has been found necessary to plasmolyse<br />
cells before wall-degrading enzymes are used. This is<br />
done by placing the cells in a solution <strong>of</strong> lower water<br />
potential than that <strong>of</strong> the cell.<br />
Glucose, sucrose and especially mannitol and<br />
sorbitol, are usually added to protoplast isolation<br />
media for this purpose, either singly or in<br />
combination, at a total concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.35-0.7 M.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se addenda are then retained in the subsequent<br />
protoplast culture medium, their concentration being<br />
progressively reduced as cell colonies start to grow.<br />
Tobacco cell suspensions take up only a very small<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> mannitol from solution (Thompson and<br />
Thorpe, 1981) and its effect as an osmotic agent<br />
appears to be exerted outside the cell (Thorpe, 1982).<br />
When protoplasts were isolated from Pseudotsuga<br />
and Pinus suspensions, which required a high<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> inositol to induce embryogenesis , it<br />
was found to be essential to add 60 g/l (0.33 M) myoinositol<br />
(plus 30 g/l sucrose, 20 g/l glucose and 10 g/l<br />
sorbitol) to the isolation and culture media (Gupta<br />
et al., 1988). Mannitol and further amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
sorbitol could not serve as substitutes.<br />
4.3.2. Osmotic effects on growth<br />
Solutions <strong>of</strong> different concentrations partly exert<br />
their effect on growth and morphogenesis by their<br />
nutritional value, and partly through their varying<br />
osmotic potential. Lapeña et al (1988) estimated that<br />
three quarters <strong>of</strong> the sucrose necessary to promote the<br />
optimum rate <strong>of</strong> direct adventitious shoot formation<br />
from Digitalis obscura hypocotyls, was required to<br />
supply energy, while the surplus regulated<br />
morphogenesis osmotically.<br />
How osmotic potential influences cellular<br />
processes is still far from clear. Cells maintained in<br />
an environment with low (highly negative) osmotic<br />
potential, lose water and in consequence the water<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> the cell decreases. This brings about<br />
changes in metabolism and cells accumulate high<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> proline (Rabe, 1990). <strong>The</strong> activity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
main respiratory pathway <strong>of</strong> cells (the cytochrome<br />
pathway) is reduced in conditions <strong>of</strong> osmotic stress,<br />
in favour <strong>of</strong> an alternative oxidase system (De Klerk-<br />
Kiebert and Van der Plas, 1985). <strong>The</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> osmolytes, may also result in high<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> the plant hormone abscisic acid, both extra<br />
vitrum and in vitro (recent reviews Zhu, 2002; Riera<br />
et al., 2005).<br />
Equilibrium between the water potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medium and that <strong>of</strong> Echinopsis callus, only occurred<br />
when the callus was dead. Normally the water<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> the medium was greater so that water<br />
flowed into the callus (Kirkham and Holder, 1981).<br />
Clearly this situation could not occur in media which<br />
were too concentrated, and Cleland (1977) proposed<br />
that a critical water potential needs to be established<br />
within a cell before cell expansion and cell division,<br />
can occur. <strong>The</strong> osmotic concentration <strong>of</strong> culture<br />
media could therefore be expected to influence the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> cell division or the success <strong>of</strong> morphogenesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cells or tissues they support. Both the<br />
inorganic and organic components will be
contributory. <strong>The</strong> cells <strong>of</strong> many plants which are<br />
natives <strong>of</strong> sea-shores or deserts (e.g. many cacti)<br />
characteristically have a low water potential (Ψcell)<br />
and in consequence may need to be cultured in media<br />
<strong>of</strong> relatively low (highly negative) osmotic potentials<br />
(Lassocinski, 1985). Sucrose concentrations <strong>of</strong> 4.5-<br />
6% have sometimes been found to be beneficial for<br />
such plants (Sachar and Iyer, 1959; Johnson and<br />
Emino, 1979; Mauseth, 1979; Lassocinski, 1985).<br />
Above normal sucrose concentrations can <strong>of</strong>ten be<br />
beneficial in media for anther culture [e.g 13%<br />
sucrose in Gamborg et al. (1968) B5 medium -<br />
Chuong and Beversdorf, 1985], and for the culture <strong>of</strong><br />
immature embryos [e.g. 10% sucose in MS medium -<br />
Stafford and Davies (1979); 12.5% in Phillips and<br />
Collins (1979) L2. medium - Phillips et al. (1982)].<br />
If the osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> the medium does<br />
indeed influence the growth <strong>of</strong> tissue cultures, one<br />
might expect the sucrose concentration, which is<br />
optimal for growth, to vary from one medium to<br />
another, more sucrose being required in dilute media<br />
than in more concentrated ones. Evans et al. (1976)<br />
found this was so with cultures <strong>of</strong> soybean tissue.<br />
Maximum rates <strong>of</strong> callus growth were obtained in<br />
media containing either:<br />
1. 50-75% <strong>of</strong> MS basal salts + 3-4% sucrose, or,<br />
2. 75-100% <strong>of</strong> MS basal salts + 2% sucrose.<br />
Similarly Yoshida et al. (1973) obtained equally<br />
good growth rates <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana glutinosa callus with<br />
nutrient media in which<br />
1. the salts exerted -0.274 MPa and sucrose -0.223<br />
MPa, or<br />
2. the salts exerted -0.365 MPa and sucrose -0.091<br />
MPa.<br />
It was essential to add 60 g/l sucrose (i.e.<br />
Ψssucrose= -0.461 MPa at 25°C) to the ‘MEDIUM’ salts<br />
<strong>of</strong> de Fossard et al. (1974) (Ψ = -0.135 MPa) to<br />
obtain germination and seedling growth from<br />
immature zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> tomato. However, if<br />
the ‘HIGH’ salts (Ψsmedium = -0.260 MPa) were used,<br />
60 g/l sucrose gave only slightly better growth than<br />
2.1 g/l (Ψssucrose = -0.156 MPa) (Neal and Topoleski,<br />
1983).<br />
A detailed examination <strong>of</strong> osmotic effects <strong>of</strong><br />
culture media on callus cultures was conducted by<br />
Kimball et al. (1975). Various organic substances<br />
were added to a modified Miller (1961) medium<br />
(which included 2% sucrose), to decrease the osmotic<br />
potential (Ψs) from -0.290 MPa. Surprisingly, the<br />
greatest callus growth was said to occur at -1.290 to<br />
-1.490 MPa (unusually low potentials which normally<br />
inhibit growth — see below) in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
Chapter 4<br />
137<br />
mannitol or sorbitol, and between -1.090 to -1.290<br />
MPa when extra sucrose or glucose were added. On<br />
the standard medium, many cells <strong>of</strong> the callus were<br />
irregularly shaped; as the osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solution was decreased there were fewer irregularities<br />
and at about Ψs = -1.090 MPa all the cells were<br />
spherical. <strong>The</strong> percentage dry matter <strong>of</strong> cultures also<br />
increased as Ψs was decreased.<br />
Doley and Leyton (1970) found that decreasing<br />
the water (osmotic) potential <strong>of</strong> half White (1963)<br />
medium by -0.100 or -0.200 MPa through adding<br />
more sucrose (and/or polyethylene glycol), caused the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> callus growth from the cut ends <strong>of</strong> Fraxinus<br />
stem sections to be lower than on a standard medium.<br />
At the reduced water potential, callus had suberised<br />
surfaces and grew through the activity <strong>of</strong> a vascular<br />
cambium. It also contained more lignified xylem and<br />
sclereids. At each potential there was an optimal<br />
IAA concentration for xylem differentiation.<br />
When the concentration <strong>of</strong> sucrose in a high salt<br />
medium such as MS is increased above 4-5 per cent,<br />
there begins to be a progressive inhibition <strong>of</strong> cell<br />
growth in many types <strong>of</strong> culture. This appears to be<br />
an osmotic effect because addition <strong>of</strong> other<br />
osmotically-active substances (such as mannitol and<br />
polyethyleneglycol) to the medium causes a similar<br />
response (Maretzki et al., 1972). Usually, high<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> sucrose are not toxic, at least not in<br />
the short term, and cell growth resumes when tissues<br />
or organs are transferred to media containing normal<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> sugar. Increase <strong>of</strong> Ψs is one method <strong>of</strong><br />
extending the shelf life <strong>of</strong> cultures. Pech and Romani<br />
(1979) found that the addition <strong>of</strong> 0.4 M mannitol to<br />
MS medium (modified organics), was able to prevent<br />
the rapid cell lysis and death which occurred when<br />
2,4-D was withdrawn from pear suspension cultures.<br />
Decreasing the osmotic potential (usually by<br />
adding mannitol) together with lowering <strong>of</strong> the<br />
temperature has been used to reduce the growth rate<br />
for preservation <strong>of</strong> valuable genotypes in vitro. This<br />
has been reported, among others, for potato (Gopal<br />
et al., 2002; Harding et al., 1997), Dioscorea alata<br />
(Borges et al., 2003) and enset (Negash et al., 2001)<br />
4.3.3. <strong>Tissue</strong> water content<br />
<strong>The</strong> water content <strong>of</strong> cultured tissues decreases as<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> sucrose in the medium is increased.<br />
Isolated embryos <strong>of</strong> barley were grown by Dunwell<br />
(1981) on MS medium in sucrose concentrations up<br />
to 12 per cent. Dry weight increased as the sucrose<br />
concentration was raised to 6 or 9 per cent and shoot<br />
length <strong>of</strong> some varieties was also greater than on 3<br />
per cent sucrose. Water content <strong>of</strong> the developing
138 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
plantlets was inversely proportional to the sucrose<br />
level.<br />
<strong>The</strong> dry weight <strong>of</strong> Lilium auratum bulbs and roots<br />
on MS medium increased as the sucrose<br />
concentration was augmented to 90 g/l but decreased<br />
dramatically with 150 g/l because growth was<br />
inhibited. <strong>The</strong> fresh weight/dry weight ratio <strong>of</strong> both<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> tissue once again declined progressively as<br />
sucrose was added to the medium (0 - 150 g/l). In a<br />
medium containing 30 mg/l sucrose, the number and<br />
fresh weight <strong>of</strong> bulblets increased as MS salt strength<br />
was raised from one eighth to two times its normal<br />
concentration. An interaction between salt and<br />
sucrose concentrations was demonstrated in that<br />
optimum dry weight <strong>of</strong> bulbs could be obtained in<br />
either single strength MS + 120 g/l sucrose<br />
(osmolality, without sucrose inversion = ca. 492<br />
mOsm/kg; Ψs = ca. -1.22 MPa), or double strength<br />
MS + 60 g/l sucrose (osmolality, without sucrose<br />
inversion = ca. 378 mOsm/kg; Ψs = ca. -0.94 MPa)<br />
(Takayama and Misawa, 1979).<br />
4.3.4. Morphogenesis<br />
<strong>The</strong> osmotic effect <strong>of</strong> sucrose in culture solutions<br />
was well demonstrated by a series <strong>of</strong> experiments on<br />
tobacco callus by Brown et al., (1979): rates <strong>of</strong> callus<br />
growth and shoot regeneration which were optimal on<br />
culture media containing 3 per cent sucrose, could be<br />
maintained when the sugar was replaced partially by<br />
osmotically equivalent levels <strong>of</strong> mannitol. <strong>The</strong><br />
optimal (medium plus sucrose) here was between<br />
-0.4 and -0.6 MPa, and increasing sucrose levels<br />
above 3 per cent brought a progressive decrease in<br />
shoot regeneration. Similar results were obtained by<br />
Barg and Umiel (1977), but when they kept the<br />
osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> the culture solution roughly<br />
constant by additions <strong>of</strong> mannitol, the sucrose<br />
concentrations optimal for tobacco callus growth or<br />
morphogenesis were not the same (Fig. 4.2)<br />
Brown and Thorpe (1980) subsequently found<br />
that callus <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana capable <strong>of</strong> forming shoots,<br />
had a water potential (Ψ) <strong>of</strong> -0.8 MPa, while nonshoot-forming<br />
callus had a Ψ <strong>of</strong> -0.4 MPa. <strong>The</strong> two<br />
relationships were:<br />
Shoot forming callus<br />
Ψcell = Ψs +Ψp + Ψm<br />
–0.8 =–1 + 0.4 + 0 MPa<br />
Non-shoot-forming callus<br />
Ψcell = Ψs +Ψp + Ψm<br />
–0.4 = –0 + 0.3 + 0 MPa<br />
Correct water potential. An optimum rate <strong>of</strong><br />
growth and adventitious shoot formation <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
callus occurred on MS medium containing 2%<br />
sucrose. Only a small number <strong>of</strong> shoots were<br />
produced on the medium supplemented with 1%<br />
sucrose, but if mannitol was added so that the total<br />
Ψcell = Ψs was the same as when 2% sucrose was<br />
present, the formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots was<br />
stimulated (Galiba and Erdei, 1986). Very similar<br />
results were obtained by Lapeña et al. (1988). A<br />
small number <strong>of</strong> shoot buds were produced from<br />
Digitalis obscura hypocotyls on MS medium<br />
containing 1% sucrose: more than twice as many if<br />
the medium contained 2% sucrose (total Ψs given as<br />
-0.336 MPa), or 1% sucrose plus mannitol to again<br />
give a total Ψs equal to -0.336 MPa.<br />
Water potential can modify commitment.<br />
Morphogenesis can also be regulated by altering the<br />
water potential <strong>of</strong> media. Shepard and Totten (1977)<br />
found that very small (ca. 1-2 mm) calluses formed<br />
from potato mesophyll protoplasts were unable to<br />
survive in 1 or 2% sucrose, and the base <strong>of</strong> larger (5-<br />
10 mm) ones turned brown, while the upper portions<br />
turned green but formed roots and no shoots. <strong>The</strong><br />
calli became fully green only on 0.2-0.5% sucrose.<br />
At these levels shoots were formed in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
0.2-0.3 M mannitol. When the level <strong>of</strong> mannitol was<br />
reduced to 0.05 M, the proportion <strong>of</strong> calli<br />
differentiating shoots fell from 61% to 2%. <strong>The</strong><br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> an osmotic affect was suggested<br />
because equimolar concentrations <strong>of</strong> myo-inositol<br />
were just as effective in promoting shoot<br />
regeneration.<br />
Another way to modify morphogenesis is to<br />
increase the ionic concentration <strong>of</strong> the medium. Pith<br />
phloem callus <strong>of</strong> tobacco proliferates on Zapata et al.<br />
(1983) MY1 medium supplemented with 10 –5 M IAA<br />
and 2.5 x 10 –6 M kinetin, but forms shoots on<br />
Murashige et al. (1972) medium containing 10 –5 M<br />
IAA and 10 –5 M kinetin. <strong>The</strong>se two media contain<br />
very similar macronutrients (total ionic concentrations,<br />
respectively 96 and 101mM), yet adding 0.5-<br />
1.0% sodium sulphate (additional osmolality 89-130<br />
mOsm/kg) decreased the shoot formation <strong>of</strong> callus<br />
grown on the shoot-forming medium, but increased it<br />
on the medium which previously only supported<br />
callus proliferation (Pua et al., 1985a). Callus<br />
cultured in the presence <strong>of</strong> sodium sulphate retained<br />
its shoot-producing capacity over a long period,<br />
although the effect was not permanent (Pua et al.,<br />
1985b; Chandler et al., 1987). In these experiments<br />
shoot formation was also enhanced by sodium<br />
chloride and mannitol.<br />
Increasing the level <strong>of</strong> sucrose from 1 to 3 per<br />
cent in MS medium containing 0.3 mg/l IAA,
induced tobacco callus to form shoots, while further<br />
increasing it to 6 per cent resulted in root<br />
differentiation (Rawal and Mehta, 1982; Mehta,<br />
1982). <strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots from<br />
Nicotiana tabacum pith callus is inhibited on a<br />
medium with MS salts if 10-15% sucrose is added.<br />
Preferential zones <strong>of</strong> cell division and meristemoids<br />
produced in 3% sucrose then become disorganised<br />
into parenchymatous tissue (Hammersley-Straw and<br />
Thorpe, 1988).<br />
Chapter 4<br />
It should be noted that auxin which has a very<br />
important influence on the growth and<br />
morphogenesis <strong>of</strong> cultured plant cells, causes their<br />
osmotic potential to be altered (Van Overbeek, 1942;<br />
Hackett, 1952; Ketellapper, 1953). When tobacco<br />
callus is grown on a medium which promotes shoot<br />
regeneration, the cells have a greater osmotic<br />
pressure (or more negative water potential) than<br />
callus grown on a non-inductive medium (Brown and<br />
Thorpe, 1980; Brown, 1982).<br />
Fig. 4.2 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> sucrose concentration on the growth and morphogenesis <strong>of</strong> tobacco callus.<br />
[Drawn from data for four lines <strong>of</strong> tobacco callus in Barg and Umiel, 1977]. Callus growth = solid line. Morphogenesis = line <strong>of</strong> dashes.<br />
Scale was, 1 = No differentiation, 2 = Dark green callus with meristemoids, 3 = leafy shoots<br />
Apogamous buds on ferns. Whittier and Steeves<br />
(1960) found a very clear effect <strong>of</strong> glucose<br />
concentration on the formation <strong>of</strong> apogamous buds on<br />
prothalli <strong>of</strong> the fern Pteridium. (Apogamous buds<br />
give rise to the leafy and spore-producing generation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plant which has the haploid genetic<br />
constitution <strong>of</strong> the prothallus). Bud formation was<br />
greatest between 2-3% glucose (optimum 2.5%).<br />
Results which confirm this observation were obtained<br />
by Menon and Lal (1972) in the moss Physcomitrium<br />
pyriforme. Here apogamous sporophytes were<br />
formed most freely in low sucrose concentrations<br />
(0.5-2%) and low light conditions (50-100 lux), and<br />
were not produced at all when prothalli were cultured<br />
in 6% sucrose or high light (5000-6000 lux). Whittier<br />
and Steeves (loc. cit.) noted that they could not obtain<br />
the same rate <strong>of</strong> apogamous bud production by using<br />
0.25% glucose plus mannitol or polyethyleneglycol;<br />
on the other hand, adding these osmotica to 2.5%<br />
glucose (so that the osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> the solution<br />
139<br />
was equivalent to one with 8% sucrose) did reduce<br />
bud formation. It therefore appeared that the<br />
stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> glucose on morphogenesis was<br />
mainly due to its action as a respiratory substrate, but<br />
that inhibition might be caused by an excessively<br />
depressed osmotic potential.<br />
Differentiation <strong>of</strong> floral buds. Pieces <strong>of</strong> coldstored<br />
chicory root were found by Margara and<br />
Rancillac (1966) to require more sucrose (up to 68<br />
g/l; 199 mM) to form floral shoots than to produce<br />
vegetative shoots (as little as 17 g/l; 50 mM). Tran<br />
Thanh Van and co-workers (Tran Thanh Van and<br />
Trinh, 1978) have similarly shown that the specific<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> vegetative buds, flower buds, callus or<br />
roots by thin cell layers excised from tobacco stems,<br />
could be controlled by selecting appropriate<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> sugars and <strong>of</strong> auxin and cytokinin<br />
growth regulators.<br />
Root formation and root growth. <strong>Media</strong> <strong>of</strong> small<br />
osmotic potential are usually employed for the
140 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
induction and growth <strong>of</strong> roots on micropropagated<br />
shoots. High salt levels are frequently inhibitory to<br />
root initiation. Where such levels have been used for<br />
Stage <strong>II</strong> <strong>of</strong> shoot cultures, it is common to select a<br />
low salts medium (e.g. ¼ or ½ MS), when detached<br />
shoots are required to be rooted at Stage <strong>II</strong>I. By<br />
testing four concentrations <strong>of</strong> MS salts (quarter, half,<br />
three quarters and full strength) against four levels <strong>of</strong><br />
sucrose (1, 2, 3 and 4%), Harris and Stevenson<br />
(1979) found that correct salt concentration (½ or ¼<br />
MS) was more important than sucrose concentration<br />
for root induction on grapevine cuttings in vitro. <strong>The</strong><br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> low salt levels for root initiation may be<br />
due more to the need for a low nitrogen level, than<br />
for an increased osmotic potential. Dunstan (1982)<br />
showed that microcuttings <strong>of</strong> several tree-fruit<br />
rootstocks rooted best on MS salts, but that in media<br />
<strong>of</strong> these concentrations, the amount <strong>of</strong> added sugar<br />
was not critical, although it was essential for there to<br />
be some present. For the best rooting <strong>of</strong> Castanea, it<br />
was important to place shoots in Lloyd and McCown<br />
(1981) WPM medium containing 4% sucrose (Serres,<br />
1988).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are reports that an excessive sugar<br />
concentration can inhibit root formation. Green<br />
cotyledons <strong>of</strong> Sinapis alba and Raphanus sativus<br />
were found by Lovell et al. (1972) to form roots in<br />
2% sucrose in the dark, but not in light <strong>of</strong> 5500 lux<br />
luminous intensity. In the light, rooting did occur if<br />
the explants were kept in water, or (to a lesser extent)<br />
if they were treated with DCMU (a chemical inhibitor<br />
<strong>of</strong> photosynthesis) before culture in 2% sucrose. <strong>The</strong><br />
authors <strong>of</strong> this paper suggested that sugars were<br />
produced within the plant tissues during<br />
photosynthesis, which, added to the sucrose absorbed<br />
from the medium, provided too great a total sugar<br />
concentration for rooting. Rahman and Blake (1988)<br />
reached the same conclusion in experiments on<br />
Artocarpus heterophyllus. When shoots <strong>of</strong> this plant<br />
were kept on a rooting medium in the dark, the<br />
number and weight <strong>of</strong> roots formed on shoots,<br />
increased with the inclusion <strong>of</strong> up to 80 g/l sucrose.<br />
<strong>The</strong> optimum sucrose concentration was 40 g/l if the<br />
shoots were grown in the light.<br />
Root formation on avocado cuttings in 0.3 MS<br />
salts [plus Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) vitamins] was<br />
satisfactory with 1.5, 3 or 6% sucrose, and only<br />
reduced when 9% sucrose was added (Pliego-Alfaro,<br />
1988).<br />
Although 4% (and occasionally 8%) sucrose has<br />
been used in media for isolated root culture, 2% has<br />
been used in the great majority <strong>of</strong> cases (Butcher and<br />
Street, 1964). In an investigation into the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
sucrose concentration on the growth <strong>of</strong> tomato roots,<br />
Street and McGregor (1952) found that although<br />
sucrose concentrations <strong>of</strong> between 1.5 and 2.5%<br />
caused the same rate <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> root fresh weight,<br />
1.5% sucrose was optimal. It produced the best rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> the main root axis, and the greatest<br />
number and total length <strong>of</strong> lateral roots.<br />
Somatic embryogenesis. <strong>The</strong> osmotic potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> a medium can influence whether somatic<br />
embryogenesis can occur and can regulate the proper<br />
development <strong>of</strong> embryos. As will be shown below, a<br />
low osmotic potential is <strong>of</strong>ten favourable, but this is<br />
not always the case. For instance immature<br />
cotyledons <strong>of</strong> Glycine max produced somatic<br />
embryos on Phillips and Collins (1979) L2 medium<br />
containing less than 2% sucrose, but not if the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> sugar was increased above this level<br />
(Lippmann and Lippmann, 1984).<br />
Placing tissues in solutions with high osmotic<br />
potential will cause cells to become plasmolysed,<br />
leading to the breaking <strong>of</strong> cytoplasmic<br />
interconnections between adjacent cells<br />
(plasmodesmata). Wetherell (1984) has suggested<br />
that when cells and cell groups <strong>of</strong> higher plants are<br />
isolated by this process, they become enabled to<br />
develop independently, and express their totipotency.<br />
He pointed out that the isolation <strong>of</strong> cells <strong>of</strong> lower<br />
plants induces regeneration, and plasmolysis has long<br />
been known to initiate regeneration in multicellular<br />
algae, the leaves <strong>of</strong> mosses, fern prothallia and the<br />
gemmae <strong>of</strong> liverworts (Narayanaswami and LaRue,<br />
1955; Miller, 1968). Carrot cell cultures preplasmolysed<br />
for 45 min in 0.5-1.0 M sucrose or 1.0<br />
M sorbitol gave rise to many more somatic embryos<br />
when incubated in Wetherell (1969) medium with 0.5<br />
mg/l 2,4-D than if they had not been pre-treated in<br />
this way. Moreover embryo formation was more<br />
closely synchronized. Ikeda-Iwai et al. (2003) found<br />
that in Arabidopsis a 6-12 hour treatment with 0.7 M<br />
sucrose, sorbitol or mannitol resulted in somatic<br />
embryogenesis.<br />
Callus derived from hypocotyls <strong>of</strong> Albizia<br />
richardiana, produced the greatest numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
adventitious shoots on B5 medium containing 4%<br />
sucrose, but somatic embryos grew most readily<br />
when 2% sucrose was added. At least 1% sucrose<br />
was necessary for any kind <strong>of</strong> morphogenesis to take<br />
place (Tomar and Gupta, 1988). A similar result was<br />
obtained by Ćulafić et al. (1987) with callus from<br />
axillary buds <strong>of</strong> Rumex acetosella: adventitious<br />
shoots were produced on a medium containing MS
salts and 2% sucrose (Ψs = ca. -0.39 MPa at 25°C),<br />
but embryogenesis occurred when the sucrose<br />
concentration was increased to 6% (Ψssucrose = -0.46<br />
MPa, Ψs = ca. -0.70 MPa at 25°C) or if the medium<br />
was supplemented with 2% sucrose plus 21.3 g/l<br />
mannitol or sorbitol (which together have the same<br />
osmolality as 6% sucrose).<br />
A low (highly negative) osmotic potential helps to<br />
induce somatic embryogenesis in some other plants.<br />
Adding 10-30 g/l sorbitol to Kumar et al. (1988) L-6<br />
medium (total macronutient ions 64.26 mM; 20 g/l<br />
sucrose), caused there to be a high level <strong>of</strong><br />
embryogenesis in Vigna aconitifolia suspensions and<br />
the capacity for embryogenesis to be retained in longterm<br />
cultures. <strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos in<br />
ovary callus <strong>of</strong> Fuchsia hybrida was accelerated by<br />
adding 5% sucrose to B5 medium (Dabin and Beguin,<br />
1987), and the induction <strong>of</strong> embryogenic callus <strong>of</strong><br />
Euphorbia longan required the culture <strong>of</strong> young<br />
leaflets on B5 medium with 6% sucrose (Litz, 1988).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are exceptions, particularly with regard to<br />
embryo growth. <strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> Ipomoea batatas<br />
somatic embryos forming shoots was greatest when a<br />
medium containing MS inorganics contained 1.6%,<br />
rather than 3% sucrose (Chée et al., 1990). Protocorm<br />
proliferation <strong>of</strong> orchids is most rapid when tissue is<br />
cultured in high concentrations <strong>of</strong> sucrose, but for<br />
plantlet growth, the level <strong>of</strong> sucrose must be reduced<br />
(Homès and Vanseveran-Van Espen, 1973).<br />
<strong>The</strong> induction <strong>of</strong> embryogenic callus from<br />
immature seed embryos <strong>of</strong> Zea mays was best on MS<br />
medium with 12% sucrose (Lu et al., 1982), and Ho<br />
and Vasil (1983) used 6-10% sucrose in MS medium<br />
to promote the formation <strong>of</strong> pro-embryoids from<br />
young leaves <strong>of</strong> Saccharum <strong>of</strong>ficinarum. However,<br />
in the experiments <strong>of</strong> Ahloowalia and Maretski<br />
(1983), somatic embryo formation from callus <strong>of</strong> this<br />
plant was best on MS medium with 3% sucrose, but<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> the embryos into complete plantlets<br />
required that the embryos should be cultured first on<br />
MS medium with 6% sucrose and then on MS with<br />
3% sucrose.<br />
Polyethylene glycol 4000 (PEG 4000) improves<br />
root and shoot emergence without limiting embryo<br />
histodifferentiation in soybean somatic embryos<br />
(Walker and Parrott, 2001). Likewise in spruce, it<br />
was reported that polyethylene glycol might improve<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos by promoting normal<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> the embryonic shoot and root (e.g.<br />
Stasolla et al., 2003). Non-penetrating osmotica like<br />
polyethylene glycol cannot enter plant cells, but<br />
restrict water uptake and provide a simulated drought<br />
Chapter 4<br />
141<br />
stress during embryo development. A combination <strong>of</strong><br />
ABA and an osmoticum prevents precocious<br />
germination in white spruce (Attree et al., 1991)<br />
and allows embryo development to proceed.<br />
Advantageous effects <strong>of</strong> polyethylene glycol and<br />
ABA have been reported in a number <strong>of</strong> species<br />
(Hevea brasiliensis, Linossier et al., 1997; Picia<br />
abies, Bozhkov and Von Arnold, 1998; white spruce,<br />
Stasolla et al., 2003, Corydalis yanhusuo, Sagare<br />
et al., 2000; and Panax ginseng, Langhansová et al.,<br />
2004).<br />
When cultured on Sears and Deckard (1982)<br />
medium, embryogenesis in callus initiated from<br />
immature embryos <strong>of</strong> ‘Chinese Spring’ and some<br />
other varieties <strong>of</strong> wheat was incomplete, because<br />
shoot apices germinated and grew before embryos<br />
had properly formed. More typical somatic embryos<br />
could be obtained by adding 40 mM sodium or<br />
potassium chloride to the medium. <strong>The</strong> salts had to<br />
be removed to allow plantlets to develop normally<br />
(Galiba and Yamada, 1988). Transferring somatic<br />
embryos to a medium <strong>of</strong> lower (more negative) water<br />
potential is <strong>of</strong>ten necessary to ensure their further<br />
growth and/or germination. High sucrose levels are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten required in media for the culture <strong>of</strong> zygotic<br />
embryos if they are isolated when immature. <strong>The</strong> use<br />
<strong>of</strong> 50-120 g/l sucrose in media is then reported, the<br />
higher concentrations usually being added to very<br />
weak salt mixtures. Embryos which are more fully<br />
developed when excised, grow satisfactorily in a<br />
medium with 10-30 g/l sugar.<br />
Storage organ formation. At high<br />
concentration, sucrose promotes the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
tubers, bulbs and corms (e.g. Xu et al., 1998;<br />
Vreugdenhil et al., 1998; Ziv 2005, Gerrits and de<br />
Klerk 1992). This promotion might be mediated by<br />
ABA since osmotic stress induces ABA synthesis<br />
(Riera et al., 2005) and ABA promotes bulb (Kim<br />
et al., 1994) and tuber (Xu et al., 1998) formation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> situation is, however, more complex. Suttle and<br />
Hultstrand (1994) did not find a reduction <strong>of</strong> tuber<br />
formation in potato by adding fluridone, an ABAsynthesis<br />
inhibitor, and Xu et al. (1998) did not<br />
observe an increased ABA-level at high sucrose<br />
concentration. So in potato, the effect <strong>of</strong> sucrose is<br />
not likely to be mediated by ABA. Exogenous ABA<br />
does not promote Gladiolus corm formation (Dantu<br />
and Bhojwani, 1995) but bulb formation <strong>of</strong> lily was<br />
completely inhibited by fluridone and restored by<br />
simultaneous addition <strong>of</strong> ABA (Kim et al., 1994).<br />
To establish the effect <strong>of</strong> osmoticum directly,<br />
experiments have been carried out with addition <strong>of</strong>
142 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
mannitol instead <strong>of</strong> sucrose. Mannitol did not<br />
promote corm production <strong>of</strong> Gladiolus (De Bruyn<br />
and Ferreira, 1992) or bulb production in onion<br />
(Kahane and Rancillac, 1996), but data for lily<br />
suggested that, although it had a toxic effect, in this<br />
plant mannitol did stimulate bulb formation (Gerrits<br />
and De Klerk, 1992).<br />
Anther culture. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> high concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> sucrose is commonly reported in papers on anther<br />
culture where the addition <strong>of</strong> 5-20% sucrose to the<br />
culture medium is found to assist the development <strong>of</strong><br />
somatic embryos from pollen microspores. This<br />
appears to be due to an osmotic regulation <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenesis (Sunderland and Dunwell, 1977), for<br />
once embryoid development has commenced, such<br />
high levels <strong>of</strong> sucrose are no longer required, or may<br />
be inhibitory. A high concentration <strong>of</strong> mannitol has<br />
been used for pretreatment before the culture <strong>of</strong><br />
barley anthers (Roberts-Oehlschlager and Dunwell<br />
1990) and pollen (Wei et al., 1986); tobacco anthers<br />
(Imamura and Harada 1980) and pollen (Imamura<br />
et al., 1982); and before wheat microspore culture<br />
(Hu et al., 1995). A high concentration <strong>of</strong> mannitol<br />
has also been used to induce osmotic stress in<br />
microspore derived embryos <strong>of</strong> Brassica napus<br />
(Huang et al., 1991) and before anther culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Brassica campestris (Hamaoka et al., 1991). Isolated<br />
microspores <strong>of</strong> Brassica napus cultured on a high<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> mannitol and at a low concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> sucrose (0.08–0.1%) yield no embryos whereas on<br />
high polyethyleneglycol 4000 the embryo yield is<br />
comparable to that <strong>of</strong> the sucrose control (Ikeda-Iwai,<br />
2003). <strong>The</strong>se results demonstrate that in microspore<br />
embryogenesis <strong>of</strong> Brassica napus the level <strong>of</strong><br />
metabolizable carbohydrate required for microspore<br />
embryo induction and formation may be very low and<br />
that an appropriate osmoticum (polyethylene glycol<br />
4000 or sucrose) is required.<br />
<strong>The</strong> temporary presence <strong>of</strong> high sucrose<br />
concentrations is said to prevent the proliferation <strong>of</strong><br />
callus from diploid cells <strong>of</strong> the anther that would<br />
otherwise swamp the growth <strong>of</strong> the pollen-derived<br />
embryoids. <strong>The</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> macronutrient ions<br />
generally used in anther culture media is not<br />
especially low. In a sample <strong>of</strong> reports it was found to<br />
be 68.7 mM (George et al., 1987), and so the total<br />
osmotic potential, Ψs, (salts plus sucrose) <strong>of</strong> many<br />
anther culture media is in the range -0.55 to -1.15<br />
MPa.<br />
4.3.5. Relative humidity.<br />
<strong>The</strong> vapour pressure <strong>of</strong> water is reduced by<br />
dissolving substances in it. This means that the<br />
relative humidity <strong>of</strong> the air within closed culture<br />
vessels is dependent on the water potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medium according to the equation:<br />
1000RT<br />
⎛ p<br />
Ψ = lne ⎜<br />
W ⎜<br />
0 ⎝ p0<br />
(after Glasstone, 1947)<br />
⎞ ⎛ dp ⎞<br />
⎟ .<br />
⎟ ⎜ p − c ⎟<br />
⎠ ⎝ dc ⎠<br />
where: Ψ, R and T are as in the Van’t H<strong>of</strong>f equation,<br />
W0 is the molecular weight <strong>of</strong> water, c is the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> the solution in moles per litre, and p0<br />
and p are respectively the vapour pressures <strong>of</strong> water<br />
and the solution.<br />
If the change in vapour pressure dependent on the<br />
density <strong>of</strong> the solution, p – c (dp/dc), is treated as<br />
unity (legitimate perhaps for very dilute solutions, or<br />
when the equation is expressed in molality, rather<br />
than molarity), it is possible to estimate relative<br />
humidity (100 × p/p0) above tissue culture media <strong>of</strong><br />
known water potentials, from:<br />
1000RT ⎛<br />
Ψ = lne<br />
18.<br />
016 ⎜<br />
⎝<br />
p ⎞<br />
⎟ , (Lang, 1967)<br />
⎠<br />
p0<br />
<strong>The</strong> relative humidity above most plant tissue<br />
cultures in closed vessels is thus calculated to be in<br />
the range 99.25-99.75% (Table 4.7), the osmolality <strong>of</strong><br />
some typical media being<br />
• White (1963), liquid, 2% sucrose, 106 mOsm/kg<br />
• MS, agar, 3% sucrose, 230 mOsm/kg<br />
• MS, agar, 6% sucrose, 359 mOsm/kg<br />
• MS, agar, 12% sucrose (unusual), 659 mOsm/kg<br />
(in these cases, 50% hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sucrose into<br />
monosaccharides is assumed to have taken place<br />
during autoclaving)<br />
Relative humidity can be reduced below the levels<br />
indicated above by, for example, covering vessels<br />
with gas-permeable closures while using nongelatinous<br />
support systems (see Section 6.3.1).
Table 4.7 <strong>The</strong> relative humidity within culture vessels which would be expected to result from the use <strong>of</strong><br />
plant culture media <strong>of</strong> various osmolalities or water potentials<br />
<strong>The</strong> relative acidity or alkalinity <strong>of</strong> a solution is<br />
assessed by its pH. This is a measure <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen<br />
ion concentration; the greater the concentration <strong>of</strong> H +<br />
ions (actually H3O + ions), the more acid the solution.<br />
As pH is defined as the negative logarithm <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrogen ion concentration, acid solutions have low<br />
pH values (0-7) and alkaline solutions, high values<br />
(7-14). Solutions <strong>of</strong> pH 4 (the concentration <strong>of</strong> H + is<br />
10 –4 mol.l –1 ) are therefore more acid than those <strong>of</strong> pH<br />
5 (where the concentration <strong>of</strong> H + is 10 –5 mol.l –1 );<br />
solutions <strong>of</strong> pH 9 are more alkaline than those <strong>of</strong> pH<br />
8. Pure water, without any dissolved gases such as<br />
CO2, has a neutral pH <strong>of</strong> 7. To judge the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
medium pH, it is essential to discriminate between<br />
the various sites where the pH might have an effect:<br />
(1) in the explant, (2) in the medium and (3) at the<br />
interface between explant and medium.<br />
<strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> a culture medium must be such that it<br />
does not disrupt the plant tissue. Within the<br />
acceptable limits the pH also:<br />
• governs whether salts will remain in a soluble<br />
form;<br />
• influences the uptake <strong>of</strong> medium ingredients and<br />
plant growth regulator additives;<br />
• has an effect on chemical reactions (especially<br />
those catalysed by enzymes); and<br />
• affects the gelling efficiency <strong>of</strong> agar.<br />
This means that the effective range <strong>of</strong> pH for<br />
media is restricted. As will be explained, medium pH<br />
is altered during culture, but as a rule <strong>of</strong> thumb, the<br />
initial pH is set at 5.5 – 6.0. In culture media,<br />
detrimental effects <strong>of</strong> an adverse pH are generally<br />
related to ion availability and nutrient uptake rather<br />
than cell damage.<br />
5.1. THE pH OF MEDIA<br />
5.1.1. Buffering<br />
<strong>The</strong> components <strong>of</strong> common tissue culture media<br />
have only little buffering capacity. Vacin and Went<br />
(1949) investigated the effect on pH <strong>of</strong> each<br />
Chapter 4 143<br />
Relative humidity in vessel<br />
Water potential (kPa) at temperature:<br />
(%)<br />
Osmolality<br />
(mOsm/kg) 15 ºC 20 ºC 25 ºC 30 ºC<br />
98 1121 -2686 -2733 -2780 -2826<br />
99 558 -1337 -1360 -1383 -1406<br />
99.5 278 -667 -678 -690 -701<br />
99.75 139 -333 -339 -344 -350<br />
5. pH OF TISSUE CULTURE MEDIA<br />
compound in their medium. <strong>The</strong> chemicals which<br />
seemed to be most instrumental in changing pH were<br />
FeSO4.7H2O and Ca(NO3)2.4H2O. Replacing the<br />
former with ferric tartrate at a weight which<br />
maintained the original molar concentration <strong>of</strong> iron,<br />
and substituting Ca3(PO4)2 and KNO3 for<br />
Ca(NO3)2.4H2O, they found that the solution was<br />
more effectively buffered. While amino acids also<br />
showed promise as buffering agents, KH2PO4 was<br />
ineffective unless it was at high concentration. In<br />
some early experiments attempts were made to<br />
stabilise pH by incorporating a mixture <strong>of</strong> KH2PO4<br />
and K2HPO4 into a medium (see Kordan, 1959, for<br />
example), but Street and Henshaw (1966) found that<br />
significant buffering was only achieved by soluble<br />
phosphates at levels inhibitory to plant growth. For<br />
this reason Sheat et al. (1959) proposed the buffering<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant root culture media with sparingly-soluble<br />
calcium phosphates, but unfortunately if these<br />
compounds are autoclaved with other medium<br />
constituents, they absorb micronutrients which then<br />
become unavailable.<br />
A buffer is a compound which can poise the pH<br />
level at a selected level: effective buffers should<br />
maintain the pH with little change as culture<br />
proceeds. As noted before, plant tissue culture media<br />
are normally poorly buffered. However, pH is<br />
stabilised to a certain extent when tissues are cultured<br />
in media containing both nitrate and ammonium ions.<br />
Agar and Gelrite gelling agents may have a slight<br />
buffering capacity (Scherer, 1988).<br />
Organic acids: Many organic acids can act as<br />
buffers in plant culture media. By stabilizing pH at<br />
ca. pH 5.5, they can facilitate the uptake <strong>of</strong> NH4 +<br />
when this is the only source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, and by their<br />
own metabolism, assist the conversion <strong>of</strong> NH4 + into<br />
amino acids. <strong>The</strong>re can be improvement to growth<br />
from adding organic acids to media containing both<br />
NH4 + and NO3 – , but this is not always the case.<br />
Norstog and Smith (1963) noted that 0.75 mM malic
144 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
acid was an effective buffer and appeared to enhance<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> the glutamine and alanine which they<br />
added to their medium. Vyskot and Bezdek (1984)<br />
found that the buffering capacity <strong>of</strong> MS medium was<br />
increased by adding either 1.25 mM sodium citrate or<br />
1.97 mM citric acid plus 6.07 mM dibasic sodium<br />
phosphate. Citric acid and some other organic acids<br />
have been noted to enhance the growth <strong>of</strong> Citrus<br />
callus when added to the medium (presumably that <strong>of</strong><br />
Murashige and Tucker, 1969) (Erner and Reuveni,<br />
1981). For the propagation <strong>of</strong> various cacti from<br />
axillary buds, Vyskot and Jara (1984) added sodium<br />
citrate to MS medium to increase its buffering<br />
capacity.<br />
Recognized biological buffers: Unlike organic<br />
acids, conventional buffers are not metabolised by the<br />
plant, but can poise pH levels very effectively.<br />
Compounds which have been used in plant culture<br />
media for critical purposes such as protoplast<br />
isolation and culture, and culture <strong>of</strong> cells at very low<br />
inoculation densities, include:<br />
• TRIS, Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane;<br />
• Tricine, N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methylglycine;<br />
• MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulphonic acid;<br />
• HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine(2ethanesulphonic<br />
acid); and<br />
• CAPS, 3-cyclohexylamino-1-propanesulphonic<br />
acid.<br />
Such compounds may have biological effects<br />
which are unrelated to their buffering capacity.<br />
Depending on the plant species, they have been<br />
known to kill protoplasts or greatly increase the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> cell division and/or plant regeneration (Conrad<br />
et al., 1981). <strong>The</strong> ‘biological’ buffers MES and<br />
HEPES have been developed for biological research<br />
(Good et al., 1966).<br />
MES: MES is one <strong>of</strong> the few highly effective and<br />
commercially available buffers with significant<br />
buffering capacity in the pH range 5-6 to which plant<br />
culture media are usually adjusted and has only a low<br />
capacity to complex with micronutrients. It is not<br />
toxic to most plants, although there are some which<br />
are sensitive. Ramage and Williams (2002) report<br />
that shoot regeneration from tobacco leaf discs was<br />
not affected by MES when increasing the<br />
concentration up to 100 mM. De Klerk et al (2007),<br />
though, observed a decrease <strong>of</strong> rooting from apple<br />
stem slices with increasing MES concentration (see<br />
below; Fig. 4.4). This effect <strong>of</strong> MES was not<br />
understood. It only occurred during the first days <strong>of</strong><br />
the rooting process and was not observed during the<br />
outgrowth phase after the meristems had been<br />
formed.<br />
During the culture <strong>of</strong> thin cell layers <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana,<br />
Tiburcio et al. (1989) found that the pH <strong>of</strong> LS<br />
medium could be kept close to 5.8 for 28 days by<br />
adding 50 mM MES, whereas without the buffer pH<br />
gradually decreased to 5.25. Regulating pH with<br />
MES alters the type <strong>of</strong> morphogenesis which occur in<br />
this (and other) tissues (see below).<br />
Parfitt et al. (1988) found 10 mM MES to be an<br />
effective buffer in four different media used for<br />
tobacco, carrot and tomato callus cultures, and peach<br />
and carnation shoot cultures, although stabilizing pH<br />
did not result in superior growth. <strong>The</strong> tobacco, peach<br />
and carnation cultures were damaged by 50 mM<br />
MES. Tris was toxic at all concentrations tested,<br />
although Klein and Manos (1960) had found that the<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> only 0.5 mM Tris effectively increased<br />
the fresh weight <strong>of</strong> callus which could be grown on<br />
White (1954) medium when iron was chelated with<br />
EDTA.<br />
MES has also been used successfully to buffer<br />
many cultures initiated from single protoplasts<br />
(Müller et al., 1983) and its inclusion in the culture<br />
medium can be essential for the survival <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
cells and their division to form callus colonies (e.g.<br />
those <strong>of</strong> Datura innoxia - Koop et al., 1983). MES<br />
was found to be somewhat toxic to single protoplasts<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brassica napus, but ‘Polybuffer 74’ (PB-74, a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> polyaminosulphonates), allowed excellent<br />
microcolony growth in the pH range 5.5-7.0<br />
(Spangenberg et al., 1986). Used at 1/100 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commercially available solution, it has a buffering<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> a 1.3 mM buffer at its pK value (Koop<br />
et al., 1983).<br />
Banana homogenate is widely used in orchid<br />
micropropagation media. Ernst (1974) noted that it<br />
appeared to buffer the medium in which slipper<br />
orchid seedlings were being grown.<br />
5.1.2. <strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> ions and molecules<br />
<strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> the medium has an effect on the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> many minerals (Scholten and Pierik,<br />
1998). In general, the uptake <strong>of</strong> negatively charged<br />
ions (anions) is favoured at acid pH, while that <strong>of</strong><br />
cations (positively charged) is best when the pH is<br />
increased. As mentioned before, the relative uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrient cations and anions will alter the pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medium. <strong>The</strong> release <strong>of</strong> hydroxyl ions from the plant<br />
in exchange for nitrate ions results in media<br />
becoming more alkaline; when ammonium ions are
taken up in exchange for protons, media become<br />
more acid (Table 4.8).<br />
Nitrate and ammonium ions: <strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
ammonium and nitrate ions is markedly affected by<br />
pH. Excised plant roots can be grown with NH4 + as<br />
the sole source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen providing the pH is<br />
maintained within the range 6.8 to 7.2 and iron is<br />
available in a chelated form. At pH levels below 6.4<br />
the roots grow slowly on ammonium alone and have<br />
an abnormal appearance (Sheat et al.,1959). This<br />
accords with experiments on intact plants where<br />
ammonium as the only source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is found to<br />
be poorly taken up at low pH. It was most effectively<br />
utilised in Asparagus in a medium buffered at pH 5.5.<br />
At low pH (ca. 4 or less) the ability <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong><br />
most plants to take up ions <strong>of</strong> any kind may be<br />
impaired, there may be a loss <strong>of</strong> soluble cell<br />
constituents and growth <strong>of</strong> both the main axis and<br />
that <strong>of</strong> laterals is depressed (Asher, 1978).<br />
Nitrate on the other hand, is not readily absorbed<br />
by plant cells at neutral pH or above (Martin and<br />
Rose, 1976). Growth <strong>of</strong> tumour callus <strong>of</strong> Rumex<br />
acetosa on a nitrate-containing medium was greater<br />
at pH 3.5 than pH 5.0 (Nickell and Burkholder,<br />
1950), while Chevre et al. (1983) reported that<br />
axillary bud multiplication in shoot cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
Castanea was most satisfactory when the pH <strong>of</strong> MS<br />
was reduced to 4 and the Ca 2+ and Mg 2+<br />
concentrations were doubled.<br />
pH Stabilization: One <strong>of</strong> the chief advantages <strong>of</strong><br />
having both NO3 – and NH4 + ions in the medium is<br />
that uptake <strong>of</strong> one provides a better pH environment<br />
for the uptake <strong>of</strong> the other. <strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> the medium is<br />
thereby stabilized. Uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrate ions by plant<br />
cells leads to a drift towards an alkaline pH, while<br />
NH4 + uptake results in a more rapid shift towards<br />
acidity (Street, 1969; Behrend and Mateles, 1975;<br />
Hyndman et al., 1982). For each equivalent <strong>of</strong><br />
ammonium incorporated into organic matter, about<br />
0.8-1 H + (proton) equivalents are released into the<br />
external medium; for each equivalent <strong>of</strong> nitrate<br />
assimilated, 1-1.2 proton equivalents are removed<br />
from the medium (Fuggi et al., 1981). Raven (1986)<br />
calculated that there should be no change <strong>of</strong> pH<br />
Table 4.8 <strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> ions and its consequences in plant culture media<br />
Uptake anion (e.g. NH4 + )<br />
Rate Best in alkaline or weakly acid solutions<br />
Consequence Protons (H + ) extruded by plant<br />
Medium becomes more ACID<br />
Chapter 4 145<br />
Uptake cation (e.g. NO3 ⎯ )<br />
Best in relatively acid solutions<br />
Hydroxyl (OH ⎯ ) ions extruded by plant<br />
Medium becomes more ALKALINE<br />
resulting from NO3 – or NH4 + uptake, when the ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> the two is 2 to 1.<br />
<strong>The</strong> pH shifts caused by uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrate and<br />
ammonium during culture (see above) can lead to a<br />
situation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen deficiency if either is used as the<br />
sole nitrogen source without the addition <strong>of</strong> a buffer<br />
(see later) (Hyndman et al., 1982). <strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
NH4 + , when this is the sole source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is only<br />
efficient when a buffer or an organic acid is also<br />
present in the medium. In media containing both<br />
NO3 – and NH4 + with an initial pH <strong>of</strong> 5-6, preferential<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> NH4 + causes the pH to drop during the early<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> the culture. This results in increased NO3 –<br />
utilisation (Martin and Rose, 1976) and a gradual pH<br />
rise. <strong>The</strong> final pH <strong>of</strong> the medium depends on the<br />
relative proportions <strong>of</strong> NO3 – and NH4 + which are<br />
provided (Gamborg et al., 1968). After 7 days <strong>of</strong> root<br />
culture, White (1943a) medium (containing only<br />
nitrate), adjusted to pH 4.8-4.9, had a pH <strong>of</strong> 5.8-6.0<br />
(Street et al., 1951, 1952), but Sheat et al. (1959)<br />
could stabilize the medium at pH 5.8 by having one<br />
fiftieth <strong>of</strong> the total amount <strong>of</strong> nitrogen as ammonium<br />
ion, the rest as nitrate. Changes in the pH <strong>of</strong> a<br />
medium do however vary from one kind <strong>of</strong> plant to<br />
another. Ramage and Williams (2002) observed a<br />
decrease in pH when tobacco leaf discs were cultured<br />
with only NH4 + nitrogen whereas no such decrease<br />
was observed on medium with both NH4 + and NO3 – .<br />
No organogenesis occurred when the medium with<br />
only NH4 + was unbuffered but the inclusion <strong>of</strong> MES<br />
resulted in the formation <strong>of</strong> meristems (but no<br />
shoots).<br />
<strong>Media</strong> differing in total nitrogen levels (but all<br />
having the same ratio <strong>of</strong> nitrate to ammonium as MS<br />
medium), had a final pH <strong>of</strong> ca. 4.5 after being used<br />
for Stage <strong>II</strong>I root initiation on rose shoots, whereas<br />
those containing ammonium alone had a final pH <strong>of</strong><br />
ca. 4.1 (Hyndman et al., 1982). A similar observation<br />
with MS medium itself was made by Delfel and<br />
Smith (1980). No matter what the starting value in<br />
the range 4.5-8.0, the final pH after culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Cephalotaxus callus was always 4.2. <strong>The</strong> medium <strong>of</strong><br />
De Jong et al. (1974) always had a pH <strong>of</strong> 4.8-5.0 after<br />
Begonia buds had been cultured, whatever the
146 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
starting pH in the range 4.0-6.5. This is not to say that<br />
the initial pH was unimportant, because there was an<br />
optimum for growth and development (see later)<br />
(Berghoef and Bruinsma, 1979).<br />
Other Compounds: <strong>The</strong> availability and uptake<br />
<strong>of</strong> other inorganic ions and organic molecules is also<br />
affected by pH. As explained above, the uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphate is most efficient from acid solutions.<br />
Petunia cells took up phosphate most rapidly at pH 4<br />
and its uptake declined as the pH was raised (Chin<br />
and Miller, 1982). Vacin and Went (1949) noted the<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> iron phosphate complexes in their<br />
medium by pH changes. Insoluble iron phosphates<br />
can also be formed in MS medium at pH 6.2 or above<br />
unless the proportion <strong>of</strong> EDTA to iron is increased<br />
(Dalton et al., 1983).<br />
<strong>The</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> Cl – ions into barley roots is<br />
favoured by low pH, but Jacobson et al. (1971)<br />
noticed that it was only notably less at high pH in<br />
solutions strongly stirred by high aeration. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
therefore suggested that H + ions secreted from plant<br />
roots as a result <strong>of</strong> the uptake <strong>of</strong> anions, can maintain<br />
a zone <strong>of</strong> reduced pH in the Nernst layer, a stationary<br />
film <strong>of</strong> water immediately adjacent to cultured plant<br />
tissue (Nernst, 1904). In plant tissue culture, uptake<br />
<strong>of</strong> ions and molecules may therefore more liable to be<br />
affected by adverse pH in agitated liquid media, than<br />
in media solidified by agar.<br />
Lysine uptake into tobacco cells was found by<br />
Harrington and Henke (1981) to be stimulated by low<br />
pH. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> pH on uptake is especially relevant<br />
for auxins (e.g., Edwards and Goldsmith 1980).<br />
Depending on the pH and their pKa, auxins are either<br />
present as an undissociated molecule or as an anion.<br />
For influx, the undissociated auxin molecule may<br />
pass through the membrane by diffusion whereas the<br />
anion is taken up by a carrier (Delbarre et al., 1996;<br />
Morris 2000). Dissociation dependens upon the pH.<br />
In the apoplast, the pH is low, ca. 5. When taken up,<br />
the auxin enters the cytoplasm with pH 7. At this pH,<br />
most auxin is present as anion and cannot diffuse out.<br />
Efflux <strong>of</strong> the anion is brought about by an efflux<br />
carrier system. Thus, the net uptake into cells <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
growth regulators which are weak lipophilic acids<br />
(such as IAA, NAA, 2,4-D and abscisic acid) will be<br />
greater, the more acid the medium and the greater the<br />
difference between its pH and that <strong>of</strong> the cell<br />
cytoplasm (Rubery, 1980). Shvetsov and Gamburg<br />
(1981) did in fact find that the rate <strong>of</strong> 2,4-D uptake<br />
into cultured corn cells increased as the pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medium fell from 5.5 to 4. Increased uptake <strong>of</strong> auxin<br />
at low pH was also found in apple microcuttings,<br />
both for IBA (Harbage et al., 1998) and IAA (De<br />
Klerk et al., 2007). As previously mentioned, auxins<br />
can themselves modify intra- and extra-cellular pH.<br />
Adding 2,4-D to a medium increased the uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
nicotine into culture <strong>of</strong> Acer pseudoplatanus cells<br />
(Kurkdjian et al., 1982).<br />
5.1.3. Choosing the pH <strong>of</strong> culture media: Starting pH<br />
Many plant cells and tissues in vitro, will tolerate<br />
pH in the range <strong>of</strong> about 4.0-7.2; those inoculated<br />
Fig. 4.3 Development <strong>of</strong> pH during tissue culture. <strong>The</strong> pH was set before autoclaving as is usually done, and<br />
measured directly after autoclaving and after 5 days <strong>of</strong> culture with 1-mm stem-slices cut from apple microshoots.<br />
<strong>The</strong> medium was in Petri dishes with BBL agar and modified MS medium. Per Petri dish, 30 ml <strong>of</strong> medium was<br />
added and 30 slices were cultured. (Data from de Klerk et al., 2007).
into media adjusted to pH 2.5-3.0 or 8.0 will probably<br />
die (Butenko et al., 1984). Best results are usually<br />
obtained in slightly acid conditions. In a random<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> papers on micropropagation, the average<br />
initial pH adopted for several different media was<br />
found to be 5.6 (mode 5.7) but adjustments to as low<br />
as 3.5 and as high as 7.1 had been made.<br />
<strong>The</strong> pH for most plant cultures is thus lower than<br />
that which is optimum for hydroponic cultures, where<br />
intact plants with their roots in aerated solution<br />
usually grow most rapidly when the pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solution is in the range 6.0-7.3 (De Capite, 1948;<br />
Sholto Douglas, 1976; Cooper, 1979).<br />
Suspension cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Ipomoea, grew<br />
satisfactorily in Rose and Martin (1975) P2 medium<br />
adjusted initially to pH 5.6 or pH 6.3, but the yield <strong>of</strong><br />
dry cells was less at two extremes (pH 4.8 and pH<br />
7.1). Martin and Rose (1976) supposed that a low<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> cells from a culture started at pH 7.1 was due<br />
to the inability <strong>of</strong> the culture to utilise NO3 – , but the<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> a reduction in growth at pH 4.8 was less<br />
obvious. It might have resulted from the plant having<br />
to expend energy to maintain an appropriate<br />
physiological pH internally.<br />
Kartha (1981) found that pH 5.6-5.8 supported the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> most meristem tips in culture and that<br />
cassava meristems did not grow for a prolonged<br />
period on a medium adjusted to pH 4.8. <strong>The</strong> optimum<br />
pH (before autoclaving) for the growth <strong>of</strong> carnation<br />
shoot tips on Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) medium,<br />
was 5.5-6.5. When the medium was supplemented<br />
with 4 mg/l adenine sulphate and 2 g/l casein<br />
hydrolysate, the optimum pH was 5, and on media<br />
adjusted to 6.0 and 6.5, there was significantly less<br />
growth (Davis et al., 1977). Shoot proliferation in<br />
Camellia sasanqua shoot cultures was best when the<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> a medium with MS salts was adjusted to 5-5.5.<br />
Only in these flasks was the capacity <strong>of</strong> juvenile<br />
explants to produce more shoots than adult ones<br />
really pronounced (Torres and Carlisi, 1986).<br />
Norstog and Smith (1963) suggested that the pH<br />
<strong>of</strong> the medium used for the culture <strong>of</strong> isolated zygotic<br />
embryos, should not be greater than 5.2.<br />
5.1.4. pH adjustment<br />
Because there is then no need to take special<br />
aseptic precautions, and it is impractical to adjust pH<br />
once medium has been dispensed into small lots, the<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> a medium is usually adjusted with acid or<br />
alkali before autoclaving. According to Krieg and<br />
Gerhardt (1981), agar is partially hydrolysed if<br />
autoclaved at pH 6 or less and will not solidify so<br />
effectively when cooled. <strong>The</strong>y recommend that agar<br />
Chapter 4 147<br />
media for bacteriological purposes should be<br />
sterilised at a pH greater than 6 and, if necessary,<br />
should be adjusted to acid conditions with sterile acid<br />
after autoclaving, when they have cooled to 45-50°C.<br />
<strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> hydrolysis in plant culture media<br />
autoclaved at pH 5.6-5.7, is presumably small.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> autoclaving: Autoclaving changes<br />
the pH <strong>of</strong> media (Fig. 4.3). In media without sugars,<br />
the change is usually small unless the phosphate<br />
concentration is low, when more significant<br />
fluctuations occur. <strong>Media</strong> autoclaved with sucrose<br />
generally have a slightly lower pH than those<br />
autoclaved without it, but if maltose, glucose, or<br />
fructose have been added instead <strong>of</strong> sucrose, the post-<br />
autoclave pH is significantly reduced (Owen et al.,<br />
1991).<br />
<strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> liquid media containing MS salts [e.g.<br />
Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) or Skirvin and Chu<br />
(1979) media] containing 3-3.4% sucrose, has been<br />
found to fall during autoclaving from an adjusted<br />
level <strong>of</strong> 5.7, to pH 5.17 (Singha, 1982), to pH 5.5<br />
(Owen et al., 1991), or to pH 4.6 (Skirvin et al.,<br />
1986). <strong>The</strong> drop in pH may vary according to the pH<br />
to which the medium was initially adjusted. In the<br />
experiments <strong>of</strong> Skirvin et al. (loc. cit.), the pH <strong>of</strong> a<br />
medium adjusted to 5.0, fell to 4.2; one adjusted to<br />
6.4, fell to 5.1; that set at pH 8.5, fell to 8.1.<br />
Most agars cause the pH <strong>of</strong> media to increase<br />
immediately they are dissolved. Knudson (1946)<br />
noticed that the pH <strong>of</strong> his medium shifted from 4.6-<br />
4.7 to 5.4-5.5 once agar had been added and<br />
dissolved; and Singha (1982) discovered that the<br />
unadjusted pH <strong>of</strong> MS medium rose from pH 4 to pH<br />
5.2, depending on the amount <strong>of</strong> agar added.<br />
However if a medium containing agar was adjusted to<br />
pH 5.7, and then autoclaved, the medium became<br />
more acid than if agar had not been added, the fall in<br />
pH being generally in proportion to the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
agar present.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> storage. <strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> autoclaved plant<br />
media tends to fall if they are stored. Vacin and<br />
Went (1949) noted that autoclaving just accelerated a<br />
drop in the pH <strong>of</strong> Knudson (1946) C medium, as<br />
solutions left to stand showed similar changes.<br />
Sterilisation by filtration (see below) was not a<br />
satisfactory alternative, as it too effected pH changes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> compounds particularly responsible were thought<br />
to be unchelated ferrous sulphate (when the pH had<br />
initially been set between 3 and 6), and calcium<br />
nitrate (when the original pH was 6 to 9). Complex<br />
iron phosphates, unavailable to plants, were produced<br />
from the ferrous sulphate, but if iron was added as
148 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
ferric citrate or ferric tartrate (chelates), no significant<br />
pH changes resulted from autoclaving, and plants<br />
showed no iron-deficiency symptoms.<br />
Skirvin et al. (1986) found that both with and<br />
without agar, autoclaved MS medium tended to<br />
become more acid after 6 weeks storage, for example:<br />
MS medium<br />
Time Liquid With 0.6% Difco<br />
Bacto Agar<br />
Starting pH 5.7 5.7<br />
After autoclaving 4.6 4.6<br />
6 weeks later 4.1 4.4<br />
To minimise a change in the pH <strong>of</strong> stored media,<br />
it is suggested that they are kept in the dark: Owen<br />
et al., (1991) reported that the pH <strong>of</strong> MS containing<br />
0.1M sucrose or 0.8% Phytagar, remained relatively<br />
stable after autoclaving if kept in the dark at 4°C, but<br />
fell by up to 0.8 units if stored in the light at 25°C. De<br />
Klerk et al. (2007) using BBL agar, also observed a<br />
shift <strong>of</strong> pH, but this was negligible when 10 mM<br />
MES was added (Fig. 4.3).<br />
Hydrolysis: Some organic components <strong>of</strong> culture<br />
media are liable to be hydrolysed by autoclaving in<br />
acid media. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> different<br />
brands <strong>of</strong> agar may be one factor influencing the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> hyperhydricity in plant cultures. Agar<br />
media may not solidify satisfactorily when the initial<br />
pH has been adjusted to 4-4.5. <strong>The</strong> reduction in pH<br />
which occurs in most media during autoclaving may<br />
also cause unsatisfactory gelling <strong>of</strong> agar which has<br />
been added in low concentrations. Part <strong>of</strong> the sucrose<br />
added to plant culture media adjusted to pH 5.5 is<br />
also hydrolysed during autoclaving: the proportion<br />
degraded increases if the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium is much<br />
less than this. Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sucrose is, however, not<br />
necessarily detrimental.<br />
Activated charcoal: <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> activated<br />
charcoal can alter the pH <strong>of</strong> a medium. As in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> activated charcoal it is, at one stage<br />
washed with HCl, the pH <strong>of</strong> a medium can be<br />
lowered by acid residues (Owen et al., 1995; Wann<br />
et al., 1997).<br />
4.1.5. pH changes during culture<br />
Due to the differential uptake <strong>of</strong> anions and<br />
cations into plant tissues, the pH <strong>of</strong> culture media<br />
does not usually stay constant, but changes as ions<br />
and compounds are absorbed by the plant. It is usual<br />
for media containing nitrate and ammonium ions to<br />
decline slowly in pH during a passage, after being<br />
adjusted initially to pH 5.4-5.7, Sometimes after a<br />
preliminary decrease, the pH may begin to rise and<br />
return to a value close to, or even well above that at<br />
which the culture was initiated. <strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> White<br />
(1954) medium, which contains only NO3 – nitrogen,<br />
drifted from an initial 5.0 to 5.5 towards neutrality as<br />
callus was cultured on it (Klein and Manos, 1960).<br />
With some cultures, the initial pH <strong>of</strong> the medium<br />
may have little effect. Cell suspension cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
Dioscorea deltoides in the medium <strong>of</strong> Kaul and Staba<br />
(1968) [containing MS salts], adjusted to a pH either<br />
3.5, 4.3, 5.8 or 6.3, all had a pH <strong>of</strong> 4.6-4.7 within 10<br />
h <strong>of</strong> inoculation. <strong>The</strong>re was a further fall to pH 4.0-<br />
4.2 in the next 2-3 days, but during the following 15-<br />
17 days the pH was 4.7-5.0, finally rising to pH 6.0-<br />
6.3 on about day 19 (Butenko et al., 1984). Similarly,<br />
Skirvin et al. (1986) found that MS medium adjusted<br />
to pH 3.33, 5.11, 6.63, or 7.98 before autoclaving,<br />
and then used for the culture <strong>of</strong> Cucumis melo callus,<br />
had a pH after 48 h in the range 4.6-5.0. Visseur<br />
(1987) also reported that although the pH <strong>of</strong> his<br />
medium (similar macronutrients to MS but more Ca 2+<br />
and PO4 3– ) decreased if it was solidified with agar,<br />
but on a 2-phase medium, the final pH was 6.9 ± 0.4<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether it was initially 4.8, 5.5 or 6.2.<br />
Despite the above remarks, it should be noted that<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> the pH drift which occurs in any one<br />
medium, differs widely, according to the species <strong>of</strong><br />
plant grown upon it. <strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> the medium<br />
supporting shoot cultures <strong>of</strong> Disanthus cercidifolius<br />
changed from 5.5 to 6.5 over a 6 week period,<br />
necessitating frequent subculturing to prevent the<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> senescence, whereas in the medium in which<br />
shoots <strong>of</strong> the calcifuge Lapageria rosea were grown,<br />
the pH, initially set to 3.5-5.0, only changed to 3.8-<br />
4.1 (Howard and Marks, 1987). Note also that the<br />
reversion <strong>of</strong> media to a homeostatic pH, may be due<br />
to the presence <strong>of</strong> both NO3 – and NH4 + ions (Dougall,<br />
1980). Adjustment <strong>of</strong> media containing only one <strong>of</strong><br />
these nitrogen sources to a range <strong>of</strong> pH levels, would<br />
be expected to result in a more variable set <strong>of</strong> final<br />
values.<br />
As the pH <strong>of</strong> media deviate from the original<br />
titration level, simple unmonitored cultures may not<br />
provide the most favourable pH for different phases<br />
<strong>of</strong> growth and differentiation. In Rosa ‘Paul’s Scarlet’<br />
suspensions, the optimum pH for the cell division<br />
phase was 5.2-5.4: pH 5.5-6.0 was best for the cell<br />
expansion phase (Nesius and Fletcher, 1973). <strong>The</strong><br />
maximum growth rate <strong>of</strong> Daucus carota habituated<br />
callus on White (1954) medium with iron as Fe-<br />
EDTA, occurred at pH 6.0 (Klein and Manos, 1960).
It has been suggested that acidification <strong>of</strong> media is<br />
partly due to the accumulation <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide in<br />
tightly closed culture flasks (Leva et al., 1984), but<br />
the decrease in pH associated with incubating anther<br />
cultures with 5% CO2 was found by Johansson and<br />
Eriksson (1984) to be only ca. 0.1 units. Removal <strong>of</strong><br />
CO2 from an aerated cell suspension culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Poinsettia resulted in an increase <strong>of</strong> about 0.2 pHunits<br />
(Preil, 1991).<br />
Auxin plant growth regulators promote cell<br />
growth by inducing the efflux <strong>of</strong> H + ions through the<br />
cell wall. Hydrogen ion efflux from the cell is<br />
accompanied by potassium ion influx. When cultures<br />
are incubated in a medium containing an auxin, the<br />
medium will therefore become more acid while the<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> the cell sap will rise. <strong>The</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> these<br />
changes was found by Kurkdjian et al. (1982) to be<br />
proportional to auxin (2,4-D) concentration.<br />
5.2. pH CONTROL WITHIN THE PLANT<br />
<strong>The</strong> various compartments <strong>of</strong> cells have a<br />
different pH and this pH is maintained (Felle, 2001).<br />
In the symplasm, the pH <strong>of</strong> the cytoplasm is ca. 7 and<br />
<strong>of</strong> the vacuole ca. 5. <strong>The</strong> apoplasm has a pH <strong>of</strong> ca. 5.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> cells typically generate an excess <strong>of</strong> acidic<br />
compounds during metabolism which have to be<br />
neutralised (Felle, 1998). One <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />
ways by which this is accomplished is for H + , or K +<br />
to be pumped out <strong>of</strong> the cell, in exchange for anions<br />
(e.g. OH – ), thereby decreasing the extracellular pH.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> cells also compensate for an excess <strong>of</strong> H + by the<br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> organic acids. Synthesis <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
acids, such as malate, from neutral precursors is used<br />
to increase H + concentration when the cytoplasmic<br />
pH rises, for instance if plants are grown in alkaline<br />
soils (Raven and Smith, 1976; Findenegg et al.,<br />
1986). In intact plants, there is usually a downwards<br />
gradient from the low pH external to the cell, to<br />
higher pH levels in more mature parts, and this<br />
enables the upwards transport <strong>of</strong> non-electrolytic<br />
compounds such as sugars and amino acids (Böttger<br />
and Luthen, 1986).<br />
Altering the pH <strong>of</strong> the external solution<br />
surrounding roots or cells can alter the pH <strong>of</strong> the cell<br />
(Smith and Raven, 1979). Because <strong>of</strong> necessary<br />
controls, the pH <strong>of</strong> the cytoplasm may be only<br />
slightly altered, that <strong>of</strong> vacuoles may show a more<br />
marked change. Changing the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium in<br />
which photo-autotrophic Chenopodium rubrum<br />
suspensions were cultured from 4.5 to 6.3, caused the<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> the cytoplasm to rise from 7.4 to 7.6 and that <strong>of</strong><br />
the cell vacuoles to increase from 5.3 to 6.6. <strong>The</strong><br />
increase in cytoplasmic pH caused there to be a<br />
marked diversion <strong>of</strong> carbon metabolism, away from<br />
sugar and starch, into the production <strong>of</strong> lipids, amino<br />
acids and proteins (Hüsemann et al., 1990). <strong>The</strong><br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> the pH is also illustrated in an<br />
experiment with detached leaves <strong>of</strong> Vicia faba (Felle<br />
and Hanstein, 2002). When the leaves were placed in<br />
a 10 mM MES-TRIS buffer and transferred to buffer<br />
with another pH, changes in the pH <strong>of</strong> the apoplasm<br />
were small: with an initial buffer pH = 4.1 and<br />
transfer to buffer pH = 6.8, the apoplastic pH <strong>of</strong><br />
substomatal cavities increased from 4.71 to 5.13 and<br />
in the reverse transfer decreased from 5.13 to 4.70.<br />
This indicates that the pH <strong>of</strong> the apoplasm is not<br />
strongly influenced by the medium but stays close to<br />
the ‘natural’ pH <strong>of</strong> ca. 5.0. No exact details are given<br />
but in this experiment the distance between the site <strong>of</strong><br />
the pH measurements and the MES-TRIS solution in<br />
which the leaves had been placed was probably large.<br />
<strong>The</strong> symplasm has a much larger capacity to buffer<br />
(Felle, 2001) so that its pH will be even less<br />
influenced by the medium pH. Thus, within the<br />
explant the pH <strong>of</strong> both apoplasm and symplasm will<br />
be affected only little by the medium pH. <strong>The</strong><br />
situation may be different at the interface between<br />
explant and medium. <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> medium pH<br />
will extend towards inner tissues <strong>of</strong> the explant as the<br />
buffering capacity <strong>of</strong> the medium is increased (and<br />
thus overcomes buffering by the tissue). Inside the<br />
explant, the pH will also greatly influence movement<br />
Table 4.9. <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> the initial pH <strong>of</strong> Linsmaier Skoog (1965) medium on morphogenesis in thin cell layers <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana<br />
(data <strong>of</strong> Mutaftschiev et al., 1987)<br />
Initial pH<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
the medium<br />
Mean number <strong>of</strong><br />
organs per<br />
explant<br />
Chapter 4 149<br />
Mean percentage <strong>of</strong> explants forming:<br />
Callus Roots Vegetative buds Flowers<br />
3.8 4 ± 2 60 ± 10 40 ± 10 0 0<br />
5.0 2 ± 1 90 ± 10 10 ± 10 0 0<br />
6.1 20 ± 10 0 0 100 0<br />
6.8 6 ± 2 0 0 20 ± 10 80 ± 10
150 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
through membranes, i.e. uptake in cells, as this <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
depends on the dissociation <strong>of</strong> compounds which is<br />
pH dependent.<br />
Changing the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium can thus have a<br />
regulatory role on plant cultures which is similar to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulating chemicals, one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
actions <strong>of</strong> which is to modify intracellular pH and the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> free calcium ions. Auxins can modify<br />
cytoplasmic pH by triggering the release <strong>of</strong> H + from<br />
cells. In plant tissue culture these ions can acidify the<br />
medium (Kurkdjian et al., 1982). Proton release is<br />
thought to be the first step in acid-triggered and<br />
turgor-triggered growth (Schubert and Matzke, 1985).<br />
It should be noted that pH changes themselves may<br />
act as a signal (Felle, 2001).<br />
5.3. THE EFFECT OF pH ON CULTURES<br />
5.3.1. Initiating cultures at low pH<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the family Ericaceae which only grow<br />
well on acid soils (e.g. rhododendrons and<br />
blueberries), have been said to grow best on media<br />
such as Anderson (1975), Anderson (1978; 1980) and<br />
Lloyd and McCown (1981) WPM, when the pH is<br />
first set to ca. 4.5 (Anderson, 1975; Skirvin, 1981),<br />
but for highly calcifuge species such as Magnolia<br />
soulangiana, a starting pH <strong>of</strong> 3.5 can result in the<br />
highest rate <strong>of</strong> shoot proliferation in shoot cultures<br />
(Howard and Marks, 1987). Chevre et al. (1983) state<br />
that chestnut shoot cultures grew and proliferated best<br />
at pH 4 provided MS medium was modified by<br />
doubling the usual levels <strong>of</strong> calcium and magnesium.<br />
De Jong et al. (1974), using a specially developed<br />
medium, found that a low pH value favoured the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> floral organs. A similar result was seen by<br />
Berghoef and Bruinsma (1979c) with Begonia buds.<br />
Growth was greatest when the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium was<br />
initially adjusted to acid, 4.5-5.0 being optimal. At<br />
pH 4.0 the buds became glassy.<br />
Before the discovery <strong>of</strong> effective chelating agents<br />
for plant cultures, root cultures were grown on media<br />
with a low pH. Tomato roots were, for instance,<br />
unable to grow on media similar to those <strong>of</strong> White<br />
(1943a), when the pH rose to 5.2 (Street et al., 1951).<br />
Boll and Street (1951) were able to show that the<br />
depression <strong>of</strong> growth at high pH was due to the loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> Fe from the medium and that it could be overcome<br />
by adding a chelated form <strong>of</strong> iron (see chapter 3).<br />
Using FeEDTA, Torrey (1956) discovered that<br />
isolated pea roots [grown on a medium containing<br />
Bonner and Devirian (1939) A macronutrients, which<br />
do not contain NH4 + ], grew optimally at pH 6.0-6.4<br />
but were clearly inhibited at pH 7.0 or greater; and<br />
Street (1969) reported that growth <strong>of</strong> tomato roots<br />
could be obtained between pH 4.0 and pH 7.2, if<br />
EDTA was present in the medium. Because agar does<br />
not gel properly when the initial pH <strong>of</strong> the medium is<br />
adjusted to 4, it is necessary to use liquid media for<br />
low pH cultures; or employ another gelling agent, or<br />
a mechanical support.<br />
Fig. 4.4 Effect <strong>of</strong> medium pH on adventitious rooting from apple stem disks. <strong>The</strong> pH at the x-axis is the pH as measured at the<br />
start <strong>of</strong> culture after autoclaving (cf. Fig. 4.3). (from de Klerk et al., 2007).
Some other cultures may also be beneficially<br />
started at low pH, which may indicate that the tissues<br />
have an initial requirement for NO3 – . Embryogenesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Pelargonium was induced more effectively if MS,<br />
or other media, were adjusted to pH 4.5-5.0 before<br />
autoclaving (rather than pH 5.5 and above)<br />
(Marsolais et al., 1991).<br />
5.3.2. Differentiation and Morphogenesis<br />
Differentiation and morphogenesis are frequently<br />
found to be pH-dependent. Xylogenesis depends on<br />
the medium pH (Khan et al., 1986). <strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong><br />
callus and the formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious organs from<br />
thin cell layers excised from superficial tissues <strong>of</strong> the<br />
inflorescence rachis <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana, depended on the<br />
initial pH <strong>of</strong> Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) medium<br />
containing 0.5 μM IBA and 3 μM kinetin (Table 4.9)<br />
(Mutaftschiev et al., 1987). Pasqua et al. (2002)<br />
reported many quantitative effects <strong>of</strong> pH during<br />
regeneration from tobacco thin cell layers. <strong>The</strong> types<br />
<strong>of</strong> callus produced from the plumules <strong>of</strong> Hevea<br />
seedlings differed according to the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium<br />
devised by Chua (1966). S<strong>of</strong>t and spongy callus<br />
formed at acid (5.4) or alkaline (8.0) pH. A compact<br />
callus was obtained between pH 6.2 and 6.8.<br />
5.3.3. Adventitious root formation<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are several reports in the literature which<br />
show that the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium can influence root<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> some plants in vitro. A slightly acid pH<br />
seems to be preferred by most species. Zatkyo and<br />
Molnar (1986), who showed a close correlation<br />
between the acidity <strong>of</strong> the medium (pH 7.0 to 3.0)<br />
and the rooting <strong>of</strong> Vitis, Ribes nigrum and Aronia<br />
melancarpa shoots, suggested that this was because<br />
acidity is necessary for auxin action.<br />
Sharma et al. (1981) found it advantageous to<br />
reduce the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium to 4.5 to induce rooting<br />
<strong>of</strong> Bougainvillea shoots and a reduction <strong>of</strong> the pH <strong>of</strong><br />
MS medium to 4.0 (accompanied by incubation in the<br />
dark) was required for reliable root formation <strong>of</strong> two<br />
Santalum species (Barlass et al., 1980) and Correa<br />
decumbens and Prostanthera striatifolia (Williams<br />
et al., 1984; 1985). Other Australian woody species<br />
rooted satisfactorily at pH 5.5 and pH 4 was<br />
inhibitory (Williams et al., loc. cit.). Shoots from<br />
carnation meristem tips rooted more readily at pH 5.5<br />
than pH 6.0 (Stone, 1963), and rooting <strong>of</strong> excised<br />
potato buds was best at pH 5.7, root formation being<br />
inhibited at pH 4.8 and at pH 6.2 or above (Mellor<br />
and Stace-Smith, 1969). Direct root formation on<br />
Nautilocalyx leaf segments was retarded if a modified<br />
MS medium containing IAA was adjusted initially to<br />
Chapter 4 151<br />
an acid pH (3.5 or 4.0) or a neutral pH (6.5). Good<br />
and rapid root formation occurred when the medium<br />
was adjusted to between pH 5.0 to 6.3 (Venverloo,<br />
1976). De Klerk et al (2007), working with apple<br />
stem slices, found only a small effect <strong>of</strong> pH on<br />
rooting (Fig. 4.4): when the pH was set before<br />
autoclaving at 4.5 (after autoclaving the pH was<br />
4.54), the number <strong>of</strong> roots was 4.5, and with the pH<br />
set at 8.0 (after autoclaving the pH had dropped to<br />
5.65), the number <strong>of</strong> roots per slice increased to 7. In<br />
medium buffered with MES, the maximum number<br />
<strong>of</strong> roots was formed at pH 4.4 (measured after autoclaving).<br />
In these experiments, the dose-response<br />
curve for root number did not correspond with the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> pH on IAA uptake. Such discrepancy<br />
between the effects <strong>of</strong> the pH on uptake and root<br />
number, was also reported by Harbage, Stimart and<br />
Auer (1998).<br />
Direct formation <strong>of</strong> roots from Lilium auratum<br />
bulb scales occurred when MS medium was adjusted<br />
within the range 4-7 but was optimal at pH 6. <strong>The</strong> pH<br />
range for adventitious bulblet formation in this plant<br />
was from 4 to 8, but most bulblets were produced<br />
when the initial pH was between 5 and 7 (Takayama<br />
and Misawa, 1979).<br />
Substrates which are to acid or too alkaline can<br />
adversely affect rooting ex vitro.<br />
5.3.4. Embryogenesis<br />
Smith and Krikorian (1989) discovered that preglobular<br />
stage pro-embryos (PGSP) <strong>of</strong> carrot could be<br />
made to proliferate from tissues capable <strong>of</strong> direct<br />
embryo formation, with no auxin, on a medium<br />
containing 1-5 mM NH4 + (and no nitrate). Somatic<br />
embryos were formed when this tissue was moved to<br />
MS medium. <strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> the ‘ammonium-nitrogen’<br />
medium fell from 5.5 to 4.0 in each subculture<br />
period, and it was later found (Smith and Krikorian,<br />
1990a,b) that culture on a medium <strong>of</strong> low pH was<br />
essential for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> PGSP cultures.<br />
Sustained culture at a pH equal or greater than 5.7,<br />
with no auxin, allowed somatic embryo development.<br />
A similar observation to that <strong>of</strong> Smith and Krikorian<br />
had been made by (Stuart et al., 1987). Although the<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> a suspension culture <strong>of</strong> alfalfa ‘Regen-S’ cells<br />
in a modified Schenk and Hildebrandt (1972)<br />
medium with 15 mM NH4 + was adjusted to 5.8, it<br />
quickly fell back to pH 4.4-5.0 in a few hours. <strong>The</strong><br />
pH then gradually increased as somatic embryos were<br />
produced, until at day 14 it was 5.0. In certain<br />
suspension cultures, the pH was titrated daily to 5.5,<br />
but on each occasion soon returned to nearly the same<br />
pH as that in flasks which were untouched. Even so,
152 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
the pH-adjusted suspensions produced more embryos<br />
than the controls.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ammonium ion has been found to be essential<br />
for embryogenesis. Is one <strong>of</strong> its functions to reduce<br />
the pH <strong>of</strong> the medium through rapid uptake and<br />
metabolism, thereby facilitating the uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrate,<br />
upon which embryogenesis is really dependent?<br />
Embryogenesis from leaf explants <strong>of</strong> Ostericum<br />
koreanum, was found to depend strongly on pH (Cho<br />
et al 2003). As the explants were cultured continuously<br />
with NAA, it is possible that the observed relationship<br />
was caused by differential NAA uptake. This is also<br />
suggested by the slower rate <strong>of</strong> embryo development<br />
seen at low pH, because this would be expected where<br />
there is a high internal NAA concentration.<br />
6. LIQUID MEDIA AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS<br />
<strong>The</strong> nutritional requirements <strong>of</strong> plant cultures can<br />
be supplied by liquid media but growth in liquid<br />
medium may be retarded and development affected<br />
by oxygen deprivation and hyperhydration. <strong>The</strong><br />
oxygen concentration <strong>of</strong> liquid media is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
insufficient to meet the respiratory requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
submerged cells and tissues. It can be increased<br />
either by raising the oxygen concentration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medium or placing cells or tissues in direct contact<br />
with air. If the water potential <strong>of</strong> the medium is<br />
greater (less negative) than that <strong>of</strong> a cell, water flows<br />
into the cell and the vacuole becomes distended.<br />
Cells and tissues affected in this way are described as<br />
hyperhydric. Shoots <strong>of</strong>ten show physiological disturbances<br />
with symptoms that can be recognised<br />
visually (Chapter 13) (Debergh et al., 1992; Gaspar<br />
et al., 1987; Preece and Sutter, 1991; Ziv, 1991). <strong>The</strong><br />
term hyperhydric is preferable to the previously used<br />
term ‘vitrified’ for reasons explained by Debergh<br />
et al. (1992). Water potential is determined by<br />
osmotic potential <strong>of</strong> the solutes in the medium and, in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> a gelled medium, by the matric potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> the gel (Section 4.1) (Beruto et al., 1995; Fujiwara<br />
and Kozai, 1995; Owens and Wozniak, 1991).<br />
Reductions in hyperhydricity can be achieved by<br />
increasing the concentrations <strong>of</strong> the solutes and the<br />
gel. Hyperhydricity may also be reduced through<br />
evaporation <strong>of</strong> water from tissues if they are placed in<br />
contact with air.<br />
Contact <strong>of</strong> cultured tissues with air, to alleviate<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> hyperhydricity and hypoxia, can be<br />
achieved by the use <strong>of</strong> either porous or semi-solid<br />
(gelled) supports. <strong>The</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> supports, as<br />
opposed to thin layers <strong>of</strong> liquid medium, is that<br />
tissues can be placed in a sufficient volume <strong>of</strong><br />
medium to prevent depletion <strong>of</strong> nutrients and allow<br />
for the dispersion <strong>of</strong> any toxins that might be<br />
produced by the plant tissues. <strong>The</strong> relative<br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> liquid medium, solid supports or gelled<br />
media, varies with the type <strong>of</strong> material being<br />
cultured, the purpose <strong>of</strong> the culture and the scale <strong>of</strong><br />
culture, as discussed below.<br />
6.1. LIQUID MEDIA<br />
Liquid medium, without supporting structures, is<br />
used for the culture <strong>of</strong> protoplasts, cells or root<br />
systems for the production <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites,<br />
and the propagation <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos,<br />
meristematic nodules, microtubers and shoot clusters.<br />
In liquid medium, these cultures <strong>of</strong>ten give faster<br />
growth rates than on agar-solidifed medium.<br />
<strong>Culture</strong>s may be fully or only partially immersed in<br />
the medium.<br />
Aeration <strong>of</strong> liquid medium in stationary Petri<br />
dishes is sometimes adequate for the culture <strong>of</strong><br />
protoplasts and cells because <strong>of</strong> the shallow depth <strong>of</strong><br />
the medium, but may still be suboptimal. Anthony<br />
et al. (1995) cultured protoplasts <strong>of</strong> cassava, in liquid<br />
medium in Petri dishes with an underlying layer <strong>of</strong><br />
agarose in which glass rods were embedded<br />
vertically. Sustained protoplast division was<br />
observed in the cultures with glass rods but not in the<br />
controls without glass rods. <strong>The</strong> authors suggested<br />
that the glass rods extended the liquid meniscus,<br />
where the cell colonies were clustered thus causing<br />
gaseous exchange between the liquid and the<br />
atmosphere above to be facilitated.<br />
Anthony et al. (1997) cultured protoplasts <strong>of</strong><br />
Passiflora and Petunia in 30 ml glass bottles<br />
containing protoplast suspensions in 2 ml aliquots,<br />
either alone or in the presence <strong>of</strong> the oxygen carriers<br />
Erythrogen or oxygenated Perfluorodecalin. Cell<br />
division in each <strong>of</strong> the two species was stimulated by<br />
both oxygen carriers.<br />
Laboratory-scale experimentation on immersed<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> cells, tissues and organs, may be carried<br />
out in 125 ml or 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Largescale<br />
cultures are usually carried out in bioreactors<br />
with a capacity <strong>of</strong> 1 litre or more. <strong>The</strong> concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> oxygen in the medium is raised by oxygen in the<br />
gas phase above and air bubbles inside the liquid.<br />
Increasing the oxygen concentration and circulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the medium is facilitated in flasks by the use <strong>of</strong><br />
gyratory shakers and in bioreactors by stirring and/or<br />
bubbling air through the medium (Chapter 1). <strong>The</strong>
use <strong>of</strong> bioreactors <strong>of</strong>ten involves the automated<br />
adjustment <strong>of</strong> the culture medium. <strong>The</strong> design <strong>of</strong><br />
bioreactors for plant cells and organs was reviewed<br />
by Doran (1993) and the use <strong>of</strong> shake-flasks and<br />
bioreactors for the scale-up <strong>of</strong> embryogenic plant<br />
suspension cultures has been reviewed by Tautorus<br />
and Dunstan (1995). <strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />
concentration in bioreactors can be illustrated by an<br />
investigation into the growth <strong>of</strong> hairy roots <strong>of</strong> Atropa<br />
belladonna (Yu and Doran, 1994). <strong>The</strong>y found that<br />
no growth occurred at oxygen tensions <strong>of</strong> 50% air<br />
saturation but between 70% and 100% air saturation,<br />
total root length and the number <strong>of</strong> root tips increased<br />
exponentially. Hyperhydricity in liquid cultures may<br />
be avoided by adding to the medium osmoregulators,<br />
such as mannitol, maltose and sorbitol, and inhibitors<br />
<strong>of</strong> gibberellin biosynthesis including ancymidol and<br />
paclobutrazol (Ziv, 1989).<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>lets and microtubers can be cultured by<br />
partial submersion in liquid medium. One method <strong>of</strong><br />
aerating tissues is by the automated flooding and<br />
evacuation <strong>of</strong> tissues by liquid medium. This method<br />
has been used to produce microtubers <strong>of</strong> potato from<br />
single node cuttings (Teisson and Alvard, 1999). An<br />
alternative approach to aeration is to apply the liquid<br />
medium over the plant tissues as a nutrient mist. For<br />
example, Kurata et al. (1991) found that nodes <strong>of</strong><br />
potato grew better in nutrient mist than on agar-based<br />
cultures.<br />
6.2. SUPPORT BY SEMI-SOLID MATRICES<br />
Gelled media provide semi-solid, supporting<br />
matrices that are widely used for protoplast, cell,<br />
tissue and organ culture. Agar, agarose, gellan gums<br />
and various other products have been used as gelling<br />
agents.<br />
6.2.1. Agar<br />
Agar is very widely employed for the preparation<br />
<strong>of</strong> semi-solid culture media. It has the advantages<br />
that have made it so widely used for the culture <strong>of</strong><br />
bacteria, namely :-<br />
• it forms gels with water that melt at approx.<br />
100°C and solidify at approx. 45°C, and are thus<br />
stable at all feasible incubation temperatures;<br />
• gels are not digested by plant enzymes;<br />
• agar does not strongly react with media<br />
constituents.<br />
To ensure adequate contact between tissue and<br />
medium, a lower concentration <strong>of</strong> agar is generally<br />
used for plant cultures than for the culture <strong>of</strong> bacteria.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> media are not firmly gelled, but only rendered<br />
Chapter 4 153<br />
semi-solid. Depending on brand, concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
between 0.5-1.0% agar are generally used for this<br />
purpose. Agar is thought to be composed <strong>of</strong> a<br />
complex mixture <strong>of</strong> related polysaccharides built up<br />
from galactose. <strong>The</strong>se range from an uncharged<br />
neutral polymer fraction, agarose, that has the<br />
capacity to form strong gels, to highly charged<br />
anionic polysaccharides, sometimes called<br />
agaropectins, which give agar its viscosity. Agar is<br />
extracted from species <strong>of</strong> Gelidium and other red<br />
algae, collected from the sea in several different<br />
countries. It varies in nature according to country <strong>of</strong><br />
origin, the year <strong>of</strong> collection and the way in which it<br />
has been extracted and processed. <strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
agarose to total polysaccharides can vary from 50 to<br />
90% (Adrian and Assoumani, 1983). Agars contain<br />
small amounts <strong>of</strong> macro- and micro-elements;<br />
particularly calcium, sodium, potassium, and<br />
phosphate (Beruto et al., 1995; Debergh, 1983;<br />
Scherer et al., 1988), carbohydrates, traces <strong>of</strong> amino<br />
acids and vitamins (Day, 1942) that affect the<br />
osmotic and nutrient characteristics <strong>of</strong> a gel. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
also contain phenolic substances (Scherer et al.,<br />
1988) and less pure grades may contain long chain<br />
fatty acids, inhibitory to the growth <strong>of</strong> some bacteria.<br />
As agar can be the most expensive component <strong>of</strong><br />
plant media, there is interest in minimising its<br />
concentration. Concentrations <strong>of</strong> agar can be<br />
considered inadequate if they do not support explants<br />
or lead to hyperhydricity. Hyperhydricity decreases<br />
as the agar concentration is raised but there may be<br />
an accompanying reduction in the rate <strong>of</strong> growth. For<br />
example, Debergh et al. (1981) found that shoot<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Cynara scolymus were hyperhydric on<br />
medium containing 0.6% Difco ‘Bacto’ agar. No<br />
hyperhydricity occurred on medium containing 1.1%<br />
agar but shoot proliferation was reduced. Likewise,<br />
Hakkaart and Versluijs (1983) found that shoots <strong>of</strong><br />
carnation were hyperhydric on medium containing<br />
0.6% agar whereas growth was severely reduced on<br />
medium containing 1.2%. During studies to optimise<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> morphogenic callus from leaf discs<br />
<strong>of</strong> sugarbeet, Owens and Wozniak (1991) found large<br />
differences in the numbers <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos and<br />
shoots according to the gelling agent employed.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y found that water availability, determined by gel<br />
matric potential, was the dominant factor involved.<br />
When they adjusted the concentrations <strong>of</strong> the gelling<br />
agents to give media <strong>of</strong> equal gel matric potential,<br />
somatic embryos and shoots were found in similar<br />
numbers on Bacto agar (0.7%), HGT agarose<br />
(0.46%), Phytagar (0.62%) and Gelrite (0.12%).
154 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
Various brands and grades <strong>of</strong> agar are available<br />
commercially. <strong>The</strong>se differ in the amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
impurities they contain and their gelling capabilities.<br />
<strong>The</strong> gelling capacity <strong>of</strong> Difco brands <strong>of</strong> agar<br />
increased with increasing purity i.e. ‘Noble’ ><br />
‘Purified’ > ‘Bacto’ (Debergh, 1983). After<br />
impurities <strong>of</strong> agar were removed by sealing agar in a<br />
semi-permeable bags and washing in deionized water,<br />
the water potentials <strong>of</strong> gels <strong>of</strong> three brands were<br />
substantially lower than unwashed gels (Beruto et al.,<br />
1995). A ten-fold difference in the regeneration rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> sugar cane was observed by Anders et al. (1988)<br />
on media gelled with the best and least effective <strong>of</strong><br />
seven brands <strong>of</strong> agar. Scholten and Pierik (1998)<br />
investigated the different growth characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
seven different agar brands on the growth <strong>of</strong> axillary<br />
shoots, adventitious shoots and adventitious roots <strong>of</strong><br />
rose, lily and cactus. <strong>The</strong>y concluded that no single<br />
bioassay could identify ‘good or bad’ agars for a<br />
large group <strong>of</strong> plant species but Merk 1614, Daishin,<br />
MC29, and BD Purified gave the best results in most<br />
experiments. ‘Daishin’ showed no batch-to-batch<br />
variations. <strong>The</strong>y found no relationship between price<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong> the brands <strong>of</strong> agar.<br />
Agarose. Agarose is the high gel strength moiety<br />
<strong>of</strong> agar. It consists <strong>of</strong> β-D(1→3) galactopyranose and<br />
3,6-anhydro-α-L(1 → 4) galactopyranose polymer<br />
chains <strong>of</strong> 20-160 monosaccharide units alternatively<br />
linked to form double helices. <strong>The</strong>re are also several<br />
different agaro-pectin products available, which have<br />
been extracted from agar and treated to remove most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the residual sulphate side groupings (Shillito et al.,<br />
1983). Because preparation involves additional<br />
processes, agarose is much more expensive than agar<br />
and its use is only warranted for valuable cultures,<br />
including protoplast and anther culture. Brands may<br />
differ widely in their suitability for these applications.<br />
Concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.4-1.0% are used. Agarose<br />
derivatives are available which melt and gel at<br />
temperatures below 30°C, making them especially<br />
suitable for testing media ingredients that are heatlabile,<br />
or for embedding protoplasts. Low meltingpoint<br />
agarose is prepared by introducing<br />
hydroxyethyl groups into the agarose molecules<br />
(Shillito et al., 1983). Another advantage <strong>of</strong> agarose<br />
over agar lies in the removal <strong>of</strong> toxic components <strong>of</strong><br />
agar during its preparation. Bolandi et al. (1999)<br />
preferred to embed protoplasts in agarose, rather than<br />
use liquid medium, because in agarose the semi-solid<br />
matrix applies a direct pressure on the plasma<br />
membrane <strong>of</strong> the protoplasts. <strong>The</strong>y mixed protoplasts<br />
<strong>of</strong> sunflower with 0.5% agarose, pipetted 50 μl<br />
droplets <strong>of</strong> the mixture into Petri dishes and covered<br />
them with a thin layer <strong>of</strong> culture medium. A similar<br />
method was used to culture protoplasts <strong>of</strong> Dioscorea<br />
by Tor et al. (1999). <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> droplets has the<br />
advantage that a high plating density can be achieved<br />
in the droplets, while exposing the protoplasts to a<br />
larger reservoir <strong>of</strong> culture medium in the liquid phase.<br />
Bishoi et al. (2000) initially cultured anthers <strong>of</strong><br />
Basmati rice on liquid medium, then used 1.0%<br />
agarose to culture calli derived from microspores.<br />
6.2.2. Gellan gum<br />
Gellan gum is a widely used gelling agent in plant<br />
tissue culture, that is marketed under various trade<br />
names including Gelrite, Phytagel and Kelcogel. It<br />
is an exopolysaccharide that encapsulates cells <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bacterium Sphingomonas paucimobilis (= Auromonas<br />
elodea = Pseudomonas elodea), from which it is<br />
obtained by industrial fermentation. <strong>The</strong> structure,<br />
physico-chemical properties and the rheology <strong>of</strong><br />
solutions <strong>of</strong> gellan gum and related polysaccharides<br />
has been reviewed by Banik et al. (2000). Gellan<br />
gum consists <strong>of</strong> a linear repeating tetrasaccharide <strong>of</strong><br />
D-glucose, D-glucuronic acid, D-glucose and Lrhamnose.<br />
Heating solutions <strong>of</strong> gellan gum in<br />
solutions that contain cations, such as K + , Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ ,<br />
causes the polysaccharide to form a gel in which the<br />
polymers form a half-staggered parallel double helix.<br />
<strong>The</strong> commercial deacetylated and purified<br />
polysaccharide forms a firm non-elastic gel. <strong>The</strong> gel<br />
sets rapidly at a temperature, determined by the<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> the polysaccharide and the cation,<br />
which varies between 35-50 °C (Kang et al., 1982).<br />
<strong>The</strong> commercial product contains significant<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> potassium, sodium, calcium and<br />
magnesium (Pasqualetto et al., 1988a,b; Scherer<br />
et al., 1988) but is said to be free <strong>of</strong> the organic<br />
impurities found in agar. It is unclear whether or not<br />
these cations remain fully available to plant cultures.<br />
Some researchers (Gawel et al., 1986; 1990;<br />
Trolinder and Goodin, 1987; Umbeck et al., 1987)<br />
add an extra 750 mg l –1 MgCl2 to a medium<br />
containing MS salts to aid the gelling <strong>of</strong> 1.6% Gelrite.<br />
In most other reports on the use <strong>of</strong> Gelrite, cations in<br />
the medium have been sufficient to produce a gel.<br />
Beruto et al. (1995) found that 0.12 % Gelrite and<br />
0.7% Bacto agar have equivalent matric potential<br />
and support equivalent adventitious regeneration in<br />
leaf discs <strong>of</strong> sugarbeet. As gellan gum is used in<br />
lower concentration than agar, the cost per litre <strong>of</strong><br />
medium is less. It produces a clear gel in which plant<br />
tissues can be more easily seen and microbial
contamination more easily detected than in agar gels.<br />
It has proved to be a suitable gelling agent for tissue<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> many herbaceous plants and there are<br />
reports <strong>of</strong> its successful use for callus culture, the<br />
direct and indirect formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious organs<br />
and somatic embryos, shoot culture <strong>of</strong> herbaceous<br />
and semi-woody species and the rooting <strong>of</strong> plantlets.<br />
In most cases the results have been as good as, and<br />
sometimes superior to, those obtainable on agarsolidified<br />
media. Anders et al. (1988) described the<br />
regeneration <strong>of</strong> greater numbers <strong>of</strong> plants from <strong>of</strong><br />
sugar cane on Gelrite than on the most productive<br />
brand <strong>of</strong> agar, and Koetje et al. (1989) obtained more<br />
somatic embryos from callus cultures <strong>of</strong> rice on<br />
media solidified with Gelrite than with Bacto-agar.<br />
Shoot cultures, particularly <strong>of</strong> some woody species,<br />
are liable to become hyperhydric if Gelrite, like agar,<br />
is used at too low a concentration. <strong>The</strong>re are sharp<br />
differences in the response <strong>of</strong> different species to<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> Gelrite. Turner and Singha (1990)<br />
found the highest rate <strong>of</strong> shoot proliferation in Geum<br />
occurred on 0.2% and in Malus on 0.4%. Garin et al.<br />
(2000) obtained more mature somatic embryos <strong>of</strong><br />
Pinus strobus on gellan gum at 1% concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
than at 0.6%. Pasqualetto et al. (1986a,b) used<br />
mixtures <strong>of</strong> Gelrite (0.1-0.15%) and Sigma @ agar<br />
(0.2-0.3%) to prevent the hyperhydricity that<br />
occurred in shoot cultures <strong>of</strong> Malus domestica ‘Gala’<br />
on media solidified with Gelrite alone. Nairn (1988)<br />
used a mixture <strong>of</strong> Gelrite (0.194%) and Difco<br />
‘Bacto’ agar (0.024%) to prevent the hyperhydricity<br />
that occurred in shoot cultures <strong>of</strong> Pinus radiata on<br />
medium gelled with 0.2% Gelrite alone.<br />
6.2.3. Alginates<br />
Alginic acid is a binary linear heteropolymer 1,4β-D-mannuronic<br />
acid and 1,4-α-L-guluronic acid<br />
(Larkin et al., 1988). It is extracted from various<br />
species <strong>of</strong> brown algae. When the sodium salt is<br />
exposed to calcium ions, gelation occurs. Alginates<br />
are widely used for protoplast culture and to<br />
encapsulate artificial seed.<br />
Protoplasts embedded in beads or thin films <strong>of</strong><br />
alginate can plated densely while yet exposed to a<br />
large pool <strong>of</strong> medium that dilutes inhibitors and toxic<br />
substances. Embedded protoplasts can be surrounded<br />
by nurse cells, either free in the surrounding medium<br />
or separated by filters or membranes. Alginate has<br />
the advantages over agarose that protoplasts do not<br />
have to be exposed to elevated temperatures when<br />
they are mixed with the gelling agent and the gel can<br />
be liquified by adding sodium citrate, releasing<br />
Chapter 4 155<br />
protoplasts or cell colonies for transfer to other<br />
media. <strong>The</strong> method <strong>of</strong> embedding protoplasts in<br />
beads as employed by Larkin et al. (1988) involved<br />
mixing the protoplast suspensions with an aqueous<br />
solution <strong>of</strong> sodium alginate and dropping it, through a<br />
needle, into a solution <strong>of</strong> calcium chloride. Beads<br />
containing the protoplasts were formed when the<br />
alginate made contact with the calcium ions. Beads<br />
with a final concentration <strong>of</strong> 1.5% sodium alginate<br />
were washed and cultured in liquid medium on an<br />
orbital shaker. Protoplasts may also be captured in<br />
thin layers <strong>of</strong> alginate (Dovzhenko et al., 1998).<br />
Synthetic seeds (synseeds, somatic seeds)<br />
encapsulated in alginate (Fig. 4.4), can be prepared<br />
from somatic embryos (Timbert et al., 1995), shoot<br />
tips (Maruyama et al., 1998), apical and axillary buds<br />
(Piccioni and Standardi, 1995), single nodes<br />
(Piccioni, 1997), and cell aggregates from hairy roots<br />
(Repunte et al.,1995). <strong>The</strong> uses <strong>of</strong> sythetic seeds<br />
include direct planting into soil, storage <strong>of</strong> tissues and<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> materials between laboratories under<br />
sterile conditions. <strong>The</strong> methods <strong>of</strong> encapsulation <strong>of</strong><br />
somatic embryos <strong>of</strong> carrot were described by Timbert<br />
et al. (1995). Torpedo-shaped embryos were mixed<br />
with a 1% sodium alginate solution. <strong>The</strong> mixture was<br />
dropped into a solution 100 mM calcium chloride in<br />
10% sucrose. <strong>The</strong> beads (3-3.5 mm in diameter) were<br />
then rinsed in a 10% sucrose solution.<br />
6.2.4. Starch<br />
Sorvari (1986a,c) found that plantlets formed in<br />
higher frequencies in anther cultures <strong>of</strong> barley on a<br />
medium solidified with 5% corn starch or barley<br />
starch rather than with agar. Corn starch only formed<br />
a weak gel and it was necessary to place a polyester<br />
net on its surface to prevent the explants from<br />
sinking. Sorvari (1986b) found that it took 5-14<br />
weeks for adventitious shoots to form on potato discs<br />
on agar-solidified medium but only 3 weeks on<br />
medium containing barley starch. Henderson and<br />
Kinnersley (1988) found that embryogenic carrot<br />
callus cultures grew slightly better on media gelled<br />
with 12% corn starch than on 0.9% Difco `Bacto’<br />
agar.<br />
6.2.5. ‘Kappa’--carrageenan<br />
Carrageenan is a product <strong>of</strong> sea weeds <strong>of</strong> the<br />
genus Euchema and the kappa form has strong<br />
gelling properties. Like gellan gum, kappacarrageenan<br />
requires the presence <strong>of</strong> cations for<br />
gelation. In Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) medium at<br />
0.6% w/v, the gel strength was slightly less than that<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.2% Gelrite or 0.8% <strong>of</strong> extra pure agar (Ichi et al.,
156 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
1986). Chauvin et al. (1999) found that regeneration<br />
from cultures <strong>of</strong> tulip, gladiolus and tobacco shoots<br />
was possible in the presence <strong>of</strong> 200 mg l –1<br />
kanamycin, whereas in several other gelling agents a<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> 100 mg l –1 inhibited regeneration.<br />
6.2.6. Pectins<br />
A mixture <strong>of</strong> pectin and agar can be a less<br />
expensive substitute for agar. For example, a semisolid<br />
medium consisting <strong>of</strong> 0.2% agar plus 0.8-1.0%<br />
pectin, was employed for shoot culture <strong>of</strong> strawberry<br />
and some other plants (Zimmerman, 1979).<br />
6.2.7. Other gelling agents<br />
Battachary et al. (1994) found sago (from<br />
Metroxylon sagu) and isubgol (from <strong>Plant</strong>ago ovata)<br />
were satisfactory substitutes for agar at, respectively,<br />
one eighth and one tenth <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> Sigma purified<br />
agar A7921.<br />
6.3. POROUS SUPPORTS<br />
Aeration <strong>of</strong> the tissues on a porous substrate is<br />
usually better than it would be in agar or static liquid.<br />
Chin et al. (1988) used a buoyant polypropylene<br />
membrane floated on top <strong>of</strong> a liquid medium to<br />
culture cells and protoplasts <strong>of</strong> Asparagus. <strong>The</strong><br />
membrane (Celgard 3500, Questar Corp., Charlotte,<br />
N.C.) has a pore size <strong>of</strong> 0.04 mm and is autoclavable.<br />
Conner and Meredith (1984) found that cells grew<br />
more rapidly on filter papers laid over polyurethane<br />
foam pads saturated with medium than on agar.<br />
Young et al. (1991) supported shoots <strong>of</strong> tomato over<br />
liquid culture medium on a floating microporous<br />
polypropylene membrane and entrained the growing<br />
shoots through polypropylene netting. <strong>The</strong>y reported<br />
opportunities for the development <strong>of</strong> this method for<br />
mechanisation by mass handling. Membrane rafts<br />
were also used by Teng (1997) and Watad et al.<br />
(1995,1996).<br />
Cheng and Voqui (1977) and Cheng (1978) used<br />
polyester fleece to support cultures <strong>of</strong> Douglas fir that<br />
were irrigated with liquid media in Petri dishes.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>lets that were regenerated from cotyledon<br />
explants were cultured on 3 mm-thick fabric. When a<br />
protoplast suspension was dispersed over 0.5 mmthick<br />
fabric, numerous colonies were produced in 12<br />
days, whereas in the absence <strong>of</strong> the support, cell<br />
colonies failed to proliferate beyond the 20 cell stage.<br />
A major advantage in using this type <strong>of</strong> fabric support<br />
is that media can be changed simply and quickly<br />
without disturbing the tissues. <strong>The</strong> system has also<br />
been used for protoplast culture <strong>of</strong> other plants (e.g.<br />
by Russell and McCown, 1986).<br />
Heller and Gautheret (1949) found that tissues<br />
could be satisfactorily cultured on pieces <strong>of</strong> ashless<br />
filter paper moistened by contact with liquid medium.<br />
Very small explants, such as meristem tips, that might<br />
be lost if placed in a rotated or agitated liquid medium,<br />
can be successfully cultured if placed on an M-shaped<br />
strip <strong>of</strong> filter paper (sometimes called a ‘Heller’<br />
support). When the folded paper is placed in a tube <strong>of</strong><br />
liquid medium, the side arms act as wicks (Goodwin,<br />
1966). This method <strong>of</strong> support ensures excellent tissue<br />
aeration but the extra time required for preparation and<br />
insertion has meant that paper wicks are only used for<br />
special purposes such as the initial cultural stages <strong>of</strong><br />
single small explants which are otherwise difficult to<br />
establish. Whether explants grow best on agar or on<br />
filter paper supports, varies from one species <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
to another. Davis et al. (1977) found that carnation<br />
shoot tips grew less well on filter paper bridges than on<br />
0.6% agar but axillary bud explants <strong>of</strong> Leucospermum<br />
survived on bridges but not on agar.<br />
Paper was also used in the construction <strong>of</strong> plugs<br />
(marketed by Ilacon Ltd, Tonbridge, UK TN9 1NR)<br />
known as Sorbarods (Roberts and Smith, 1990). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
are cylindrical (20 mm in length and 18 mm in<br />
diameter) and consist <strong>of</strong> cold-crimped cellulose,<br />
longitudinally folded, wrapped in cellulose paper. <strong>The</strong><br />
plug has a porosity (total volume – volume <strong>of</strong><br />
cellulose) <strong>of</strong> 94.2% and high capillarity, so that the<br />
culture medium is efficiently drawn up into the plug,<br />
leaving the sides <strong>of</strong> the plug in direct contact with air.<br />
Roots permeate the plugs and are protected by the<br />
cellulose during transfer to soil. <strong>Plant</strong>lets <strong>of</strong><br />
chrysanthemum in Sorbarods formed longer stems,<br />
larger leaves, more roots, and developed greater fresh<br />
mass, dry weights and fresh to dry mass ratios than<br />
plantlets in agar-solidified medium (Roberts and<br />
Smith, 1990). <strong>The</strong> greater fresh to dry mass ratio<br />
indicates that contact with liquid medium led to greater<br />
hydration <strong>of</strong> tissues. This was subsequently controlled<br />
by the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a growth retardant, paclobutrazol (1<br />
mg l –1 ), in the culture medium (Smith et al., 1990a).<br />
Other porous materials that have been used to support<br />
plant growth include rockwool (Woodward et al.,<br />
1991; Tanaka et al., 1991), polyurethane foam<br />
(Gutman and Shiryaeva, 1980; Scherer et al., 1988),<br />
vermiculite (Kirdmanee et al., 1995), a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
vermiculite and Gelrite (Jay-Allemand et al., 1992).<br />
Afreen-Zobayed et al. (2000) cultured sweet<br />
potato, on sugar-free medium in autotrophic<br />
conditions, on mixtures <strong>of</strong> paper pulp and vermiculite<br />
in various proportions. Optimal growth was obtained<br />
on a mixture containing 70% paper pulp. On this
mixture, the fresh mass <strong>of</strong> plantlets was greater by a<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> 2.7 than on agar-solidified medium.<br />
Mixtures <strong>of</strong> paper pulp and vermiculite, in<br />
unspecified proportions, are prepared in a commercial<br />
product known as Florialite (Nisshinbo Industries,<br />
Inc., Tokyo). Afreen-Zobayed et al. (1999) found<br />
that growth rates <strong>of</strong> plantlets <strong>of</strong> sweet potato grown<br />
autotrophically on Florialite were greater, in<br />
ascending order, on agar, gellan gum, vermiculite,<br />
Sorbarods and Florialite (best). <strong>The</strong> dry mass <strong>of</strong><br />
leaves and roots were greater by factors <strong>of</strong> 2.9 and<br />
2.8, respectively, on Florialite than on an agar matrix.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se authors observed that roots spread better in<br />
Florialite than in Sorbarods. <strong>The</strong>y attributed this to<br />
the net-like orientation <strong>of</strong> fibers in Florialite that<br />
contrasted with the vertical orientation <strong>of</strong> fibres in<br />
Sorbarods. Ichimura and Oda (1995) found three<br />
substances that stimulated plant growth in extracts <strong>of</strong><br />
paper pulp. Each was characterised by low molecular<br />
weight and high polarity. It is possible that these<br />
substances contribute to the superior growth observed<br />
on substrates containing paper pulp.<br />
6.3.1. Opportunities for improved ventilation and<br />
photoautotrophy<br />
When plantlets are cultured in vessels containing<br />
air at a relative humidity (RH) <strong>of</strong> less than 100%,<br />
transpiration occurs which is an important factor in<br />
reducing hyperhydricity (Gribble, 1999). Relative<br />
humidity in culture vessels can be reduced through<br />
ventilation, but gelled substrates are then unsuitable<br />
because the absorbance <strong>of</strong> water by the roots <strong>of</strong> a<br />
transpiring plant is impeded by the gel’s low hydraulic<br />
conductivity (Fujiwara and Kozai, 1995) and this<br />
increases as the gel dries. Thus a common feature <strong>of</strong><br />
studies using ventilated vessels has been the use <strong>of</strong><br />
liquid medium supported by porous materials.<br />
For example, when plantlets <strong>of</strong> chrysanthemum<br />
were grown in Sorbarods in a culture vessel with air<br />
94% RH, a reduction in the tissue hydration was<br />
indicated by a significantly lower fresh to dry mass<br />
ratio than at 100% RH (Smith et al., 1990b) and<br />
increases in stem length and leaf area. In this<br />
ADRIAN J. & ASSOUMANI M. 1983 Gums and hydrocolloids in<br />
nutrition. pp. 301-333 in Rechcigl M. (ed.) 1983 CRC Handbook<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nutritional Supplements Vol. <strong>II</strong>. Agricultural Use. CRC Press<br />
Inc. Baton Rouge.<br />
AFREEN-ZOBAYED F., ZOBAYED S.M.A., KUBOTA C.,<br />
KOZAI T. & HASEGAWA O. 2000 A combination <strong>of</strong> vermiculite<br />
and paper pulp supporting material for the photoautotrophic<br />
micropropagation <strong>of</strong> sweet potato. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 157, 225-231.<br />
Chapter 4 157<br />
REFERENCES<br />
investigation, the RH was reduced to 94% by gaseous<br />
diffusion through a gas-permeable membrane that<br />
covered holes drilled in the lid <strong>of</strong> the culture vessel.<br />
<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> such ventilated culture vessels can<br />
significantly improve plant growth by reducing<br />
hyperhydration and facilitating the movement <strong>of</strong><br />
solutes to the leaves in the transpiration stream. It<br />
also provides opportunities for photoautotrophic<br />
growth in sugar-free media. When plantlets are<br />
cultured in closed vessels, carbon dioxide<br />
concentrations fall to low levels in the light period, as<br />
Kozai and Sekimoto (1988) demonstrated in cultures<br />
<strong>of</strong> strawberry plants. Photosynthesis requires an<br />
adequate supply <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide and suitable<br />
lighting. Adequate concentrations <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide<br />
for photoautotrophy can be maintained in ventilated<br />
culture vessels with (Afreen-Zobayed et al., 1999,<br />
2000) or without (Horan et al., 1995) elevated levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide in the atmosphere outside the<br />
culture vessel. Adequate lighting can be achieved<br />
under lights delivering a photosynthetic photon flux<br />
<strong>of</strong> 150 μmol m –2 s –1 in a culture room (Afreen-<br />
Zobayed et al., 1999, 2000) or in day-light in a<br />
greenhouse (Horan et al., 1995). <strong>The</strong> environmental<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> photoautotrophy in vitro have been<br />
reviewed by Jeong et al. (1995) and its advantages<br />
have been described by Kozai et al. (1995).<br />
6.4. IMMOBILISED CELLS<br />
Yields <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites are usually greater<br />
in differentiated, slow-growing cells than in fast<br />
growing, undifferentiated cells. By immobilising cells<br />
in a suitable matrix, their rate <strong>of</strong> growth can be slowed<br />
and the production <strong>of</strong> secondary products enhanced.<br />
Several ingenious methods <strong>of</strong> immobilisation have<br />
been employed. Examples include immobilization in<br />
spirally wound cotton (Choi et al. (1995), glass fibre<br />
fabric reinforced with a gelling solution <strong>of</strong> hybrid SiO2<br />
precursors (Campostrini et al., 1996), lo<strong>of</strong>a sponge and<br />
polyurethane foam (Liu et al., 1999) and alginate<br />
beads (Serp et al., 2000).<br />
AFREEN-ZOBAYED F., ZOBAYED S.M.A., KUBOTA C.,<br />
KOZAI T. & HASEGAWA O. 1999 Supporting material<br />
affects the growth and development <strong>of</strong> in vitro sweet potato<br />
plantlets cultured photoautotrophically. In Vitro Cell. Dev. –<br />
Pl. 35, 470-474.<br />
AHLOOWALIA B.S. & MARETZKI A. 1983 <strong>Plant</strong> regeneration via<br />
somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 2, 21-25.<br />
ALBRECHT C. 1986 Optimization <strong>of</strong> tissue culture media. Comb.<br />
Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. 1985, 35, 196-199.
158 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
ALONI R. 1980 Role <strong>of</strong> auxin and sucrose in the differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />
seive and tracheary elements in plant tissue cultures. <strong>Plant</strong>a 150,<br />
255-263.<br />
AMADOR A.M. & STEWART K.A. 1987 Osmotic potential and<br />
pH <strong>of</strong> fluid drilling gels as influenced by moisture loss and<br />
incorporation <strong>of</strong> growth regulators. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112,<br />
26-28.<br />
ANDERS J., LARRABEE P.L. & FAHEY J.W. 1988 Evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> gelrite and numerous agar sources for in vitro regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />
sugarcane. HortScience 23, 755.<br />
ANDERSON W.C. 1975 Propagation <strong>of</strong> rhododendrons by tissue<br />
culture. I. Development <strong>of</strong> a culture medium for multiplication <strong>of</strong><br />
shoots. Comb. Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. 25, 129-135.<br />
ANDERSON W.C. 1978 <strong>Tissue</strong> culture propagation <strong>of</strong> rhododendrons.<br />
In Vitro 14, 334.<br />
ANDERSON W.C. 1980 <strong>Tissue</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> red raspberries. pp. 27-<br />
34 in Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Conference on Nursery Production <strong>of</strong><br />
Fruit <strong>Plant</strong>s –Applications and Feasibility. U.S.D.A., A.R.S.,<br />
ARR-NE-11.<br />
ANON (RESEARCH GROUP 301) 1976 A sharp increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> pollen plant induction in wheat with potato medium.<br />
(Chinese) Acta Genet. Sin. 3, 25-31.<br />
ANON 1980 Ann. Rep. and Accounts, British Petroleum Co.<br />
Ltd. 1979.<br />
ANTHONY P., DAVEY M.R., POWER J.B. & LOWE K.C., 1995<br />
An improved protocol for the culture <strong>of</strong> cassava leaf protoplasts.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 42, 299-302.<br />
ANTHONY P., DAVEY M.R., POWER J.B. & LOWE K.C. 1997<br />
Enhanced mitotic division <strong>of</strong> cultured Passiflora and Petunia<br />
protoplasts by oxygenated perfluorocarbon and haemoglobin.<br />
Biotechnol. Tech. 11, 581-584.<br />
ARDITTI J. & ERNST R. 1984 Physiology <strong>of</strong> germinating orchid<br />
seeds. pp. 177-222 in Arditti J (ed.) 1984 Orchid Biology -<br />
Reviews and Perspectives <strong>II</strong>I. Comstock Publishing, Cornell<br />
Univ. Press, Ithaca, London.<br />
ARDITTI J. 1979 Aspects <strong>of</strong> the physiology <strong>of</strong> orchids. Adv. Bot.<br />
Res. 7, 421-655.<br />
ARNOW P., OLESON J.J. & WILLIAMS J.H. 1953 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />
arginine in the nutrition <strong>of</strong> Chlorella vulgaris. Am. J. Bot. 40,<br />
100-104.<br />
ASANO Y., KATSUMOTO H., INOKUMA C., KANEKO S.,<br />
ITO Y. & FUJ<strong>II</strong>E A. 1996 Cytokinin and thiamine requirements<br />
and stimulative effects <strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and α-ketoglutaric acid on<br />
embryogenic callus induction from the seeds <strong>of</strong> Zoysia japonica<br />
Steud. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 149, 413-417.<br />
ASHER C.J. 1978 Natural and synthetic culture media for<br />
spermatophytes. pp. 575-609 in Recheige M. Jr. (ed.). CRC<br />
Handbook Series in Nutrition and Food. Section G., <strong>Culture</strong><br />
<strong>Media</strong> and Food Supplements. Diets Vol 3.<br />
ATTREE S.M., MOORE D., SAWHNEY V.R. & FOWKE L.C.<br />
1991 Enhanced maturation and desiccation tolerance <strong>of</strong> white<br />
spruce [Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss] somatic embryos: effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> a non-plasmolysing water stress and abscisic acid. Ann. Bot.<br />
68, 519-525.<br />
AYABE S., UDAGAWA A. & FURUYA T. 1988 Stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />
chalcone synthase activity by yeast extract in cultured<br />
Glycorrhiza echinata cells and 5-deoxyflavone formation by<br />
isolated protoplasts. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 7, 35-38.<br />
BAGGA S., DAS R. & SOPORY S.K. 1987 Inhibition <strong>of</strong> cell<br />
proliferation and glyoxalase-1 activity by calmodulin inhibitors<br />
and lithium in Brassica oleracea. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 129, 149-153.<br />
BALL E. 1953 Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sucrose by autoclaving media, a<br />
neglected aspect in the culture <strong>of</strong> plant tissues. B. Torrey Bot.<br />
Club 80, 409-411.<br />
BANIK R.M., KANARI B. & UPADHYAY S.N., 2000.<br />
Exopolysaccharide <strong>of</strong> the gellan family: prospects and potential.<br />
World J. Microb. Biot. 16, 407-414.<br />
BARGHCHI M. 1988 Micropropagation <strong>of</strong> Alnus cordata (Loisel.)<br />
Loisel. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 15, 233-244.<br />
BARG R. & UMIEL N. 1977 Effects <strong>of</strong> sugar concentration on<br />
growth, greenery and shoot formation in callus cultures <strong>of</strong> four<br />
genetic lines <strong>of</strong> tobacco. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 81, 161-166.<br />
BARLASS M., GRANT W.J.R. & SKENE K.G.M. 1980 Shoot<br />
regeneration in vitro from native Australian fruit-bearing trees –<br />
Quandong and Plum bush. Aust. J. Bot. 28, 405-409.<br />
BARWALE U.B., KERNS H.R. & WIDHOLM J.M. 1986 <strong>Plant</strong><br />
regeneration from callus cultures <strong>of</strong> several soybean genotypes<br />
via embryogenesis and organogenesis. <strong>Plant</strong>a 167, 473-481.<br />
BEHREND J. & MATELES R.I. 1975 Nitrogen metabolism in<br />
plant cell suspension cultures. I. Effect <strong>of</strong> amino acids on growth.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 56, 584-589.<br />
BERGHOEF J. & BRUINSMA J. 1979 Flower development <strong>of</strong><br />
Begonia franconis Liebm. IV. Adventitious flower bud formation<br />
in excised inflorescence pedicels in vitro. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 94,<br />
407- 416.<br />
BERGMANN L. 1967 Wachstum gruner Suspensionskulturen von<br />
Nicotiana tabacum Var. ‘Samsun’ mit CO2 als Kohlenst<strong>of</strong>fquelle.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>a 74, 243-249.<br />
BERUTO D., BERUTO M., CICCARELLI C. & DEBERGH P.<br />
1995 Matric potential evaluations and measurements for gelled<br />
substrates. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 94, 151-157.<br />
BHATTACHARYA P., DEY S. & BHATTACHARYA B.C. 1994<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> low-cost gelling agents and support matrices for<br />
industrial-scale plant tissue culture. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult.<br />
37, 15-23.<br />
BHOJWANI S.S. & RAZDAN M.K. 1983 <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>:<br />
<strong>The</strong>ory and Practice. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.,<br />
Amsterdam.<br />
BIONDI S. & THORPE T.A. 1982 Growth regulator effects,<br />
metabolite changes and respiration during shoot initiation in<br />
cultured cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong> Pinus radiata. Bot. Gaz. 143,<br />
20-25.<br />
BISHNOI U.S., JAIN R.K., GUPTA K.R., CHOWDHURY V.K.<br />
& CHOWDHURY J.B. 2000 High frequency androgenesis in<br />
indica x Basmati rice hybrids using liquid culture media. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 61, 153-159.<br />
BISWAS G.C.G. & ZAPATA F.J. 1993 High-frequency plant<br />
regeneration from protoplasts <strong>of</strong> indica rice (Oryza sativa L.)<br />
using maltose. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 141, 470-475.<br />
BOLANDI A.R., BRANCHARD M., ALIBERT G., SERIEYS H.<br />
& SARRAFI A. 1999 Cytoplasmic-nuclear interaction and<br />
medium effect for protoplast culture in sunflower. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 57, 189-193.<br />
BOLL W.G. & STREET H.E. 1951 Studies on the growth <strong>of</strong> excised<br />
roots. 1. <strong>The</strong> stimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> molybdenum and copper on the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> excised tomato roots. New Phytol. 50, 52-75.<br />
BONNER J. & ADDICOTT F. 1937 Cultivation in vitro <strong>of</strong> excised<br />
pea roots. Bot. Gaz. 99, 144-170.<br />
BONNER J. & DEVIRIAN P.S. 1939 Growth factor requirements<br />
<strong>of</strong> four species <strong>of</strong> isolated roots. Am. J. Bot. 26, 661-665.<br />
BONNER J. & DEVIRIAN P.S. 1939 Growth factor requirements<br />
<strong>of</strong> four species <strong>of</strong> isolated roots. Am. J. Bot. 26, 661-665.<br />
BONNER J. 1937 Vitamin B1, a growth factor for higher plants.<br />
Science 85, 183-184.<br />
BONNER J. 1938a Thiamin (Vitamin B1) and the growth <strong>of</strong> roots:<br />
the relation <strong>of</strong> chemical structure to physiological activity. Am. J.<br />
Bot. 25, 543-549.<br />
BONNER J. 1940a Specificity <strong>of</strong> nicotinic acid as a growth factor<br />
for isolated pea roots. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 15, 553-557.
BORGES M., MENESES S., VAZQUEZ J., GARCIA M.,<br />
AGUILERA N., INFANTE Z., RODRIGUEZ A. & FONSECA<br />
M. 2003 In vitro conservation <strong>of</strong> Dioscorea alata L. germplasm<br />
by slow growth. <strong>Plant</strong> Gen. Res. Newsl. 133, 8-12.<br />
BORKIRD C. & SINK K.C. 1983 Medium components for shoot<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll-deficient mutants <strong>of</strong> Petunia inflata. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell Rep. 2, 1-4.<br />
BÖTTGER M. & LUTHEN H. 1986 Possible linkage between<br />
NADH-oxidation and proton secretion in Zea mays L. roots. J.<br />
Exp. Bot. 37, 666-675.<br />
BOZHKOV P.V. & VON ARNOLD S. 1998 Polyethylene glycol<br />
promotes maturation but inhibits further development <strong>of</strong> Picea<br />
abies somatic embryos. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 104, 211-224.<br />
BRETZLOFF C.W. Jr. 1954 <strong>The</strong> growth and fruiting <strong>of</strong> Sordaria<br />
fimicola. Am. J. Bot. 41, 58-67.<br />
BRIDSON E.Y. 1978 Diets, culture media and food supplements.<br />
pp. 91-281 in Rechcigl M. Jr. (ed.) CRC Handbook Series in<br />
Nutrition and Food. Section G. Vol.3.<br />
BRINK R.A., COOPER D.C. & AUSHERMAN L.E. 1944 A<br />
hybrid between Hordeum jubatum and Secale cereale. J. Hered.<br />
35, 67-75.<br />
BROWN D.C.W. & THORPE T.A. 1982 Mitochondrial activity<br />
during shoot formation and growth in tobacco callus. Physiol.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>. 54, 125-130.<br />
BROWN D.C.W. & THORPE T.A. 1980 Changes in water<br />
potential and its components during shoot formation in tobacco<br />
callus. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 49, 83-87.<br />
BROWN D.C.W., LEUNG D.W.M. & THORPE T.A. 1979<br />
Osmotic requirement for shoot formation in tobacco callus.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 46, 36-41.<br />
BROWN C., BROOKS E.J., PEARSON D. & MATHIAS R.J.<br />
1989 Control <strong>of</strong> embryogenesis and organogenesis in immature<br />
wheat embryo callus using increased medium osmolarity and<br />
abscisic acid. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 133, 727-733.<br />
BURNET G. & IBRAHIM R.K. 1973 <strong>Tissue</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> Citrus peel<br />
and its potential for flavonoid synthesis. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 69,<br />
152-162.<br />
BURSTROM H. 1957 Root surface development, sucrose<br />
inversion and free space. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 10, 741-751.<br />
BUTCHER D.N. & STREET H.E. 1964 Excised root culture. Bot.<br />
Rev. 30, 513-586.<br />
BUTENKO R.G., LIPSKY A.K.H., CHERNYAK N.D. & ARYA<br />
H.C. 1984 Changes in culture medium pH by cell suspension<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Dioscorea deltoidea. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 35, 207-212.<br />
CALLEBAUT A. & MOTTE J.-C. 1988 Growth <strong>of</strong> cucumber cells<br />
in media with lactose or milk whey as carbon source. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
Rep. 7, 162- 165.<br />
CAMPOSTRINI R., CARTURAN G., CANIATO R., PIOVAN<br />
A., FILIPPINI R., INNOCENTI G. & CAPPELLETTI E.M.<br />
1996 Immobilization <strong>of</strong> plant cells in hybrid sol-gel materials. J.<br />
Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 7, 87-97.<br />
CANHOTO J.M. & CRUZ G.S. 1994 Improvement <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis in Feijoa sellowiana Berg (Myrtaceae) by<br />
manipulation <strong>of</strong> culture media composition. In Vitro Cell. Dev. –<br />
Pl. 30, 21-25.<br />
CAPLIN S.M. & STEWARD F.C. 1948 Effects <strong>of</strong> coconut milk on<br />
the growth <strong>of</strong> explants from carrot root. Science 108, 655-657.<br />
CARCELLER M., DAVEY M.R., FOWLER M.W. & STREET<br />
H.E. 1971 <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> sucrose, 2,4-D and kinetin on the<br />
growth, fine structure and lignin content <strong>of</strong> cultured sycamore<br />
cells. Protoplasma 73, 367-385.<br />
CARIMI F., DE PASQUALE F. & CRESCIMANNO F.G. 1999<br />
Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from pistil thin<br />
cell layers <strong>of</strong> Citrus. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 18, 935-940.<br />
CARIMI F., DE PASQUALE F. & PUGLIA A.M. 1998 In vitro<br />
rescue <strong>of</strong> zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> sour orange, Citrus aurantium L.,<br />
Chapter 4 159<br />
and their detection based on RFLP analysis. <strong>Plant</strong> Breeding 117,<br />
261-266.<br />
CARPITA N., SABULARSE D., MONTEZINOS D. & DELMER<br />
D.P. (1979) Determination <strong>of</strong> the pore size <strong>of</strong> cell walls <strong>of</strong> living<br />
plant cells. Science 205,1144-1147.<br />
CHANDLER M.T., TANDEAU DE MARSAC N. &<br />
KOUCHKOVSKY Y. 1972 Photosynthetic growth <strong>of</strong> tobacco<br />
cells in liquid suspensions. Can. J. Bot. 50, 2265-2270.<br />
CHANDLER S.F., RAGOLSKY E., PUA E.-C. & THORPE T.A.<br />
1987 Some morphogenic effects <strong>of</strong> sodium sulphate on tobacco<br />
callus. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 11, 141-150.<br />
CHAUVIN J.E. & SALESSES G. 1988 Advances in chestnut<br />
micropropagation (Castanea sp.). Acta Hortic. 227, 340-345.<br />
CHAUVIN J.E., MARHADOUR S., COHAT J. & LE NARD M.<br />
1999 Effects <strong>of</strong> gelling agents on in vitro regeneration and<br />
kanamycin efficiency as a selective agent in plant transformation<br />
procedures. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 58, 213-217.<br />
CHAZEN O., HARTUNG W. & NEUMANN P.M. 1995 <strong>The</strong><br />
different effects <strong>of</strong> PEG 6000 and NaCl on leaf development are<br />
associated with differential inhibition <strong>of</strong> root water transport.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Environ. 18, 727-735.<br />
CHEE P.P. 1995 Stimulation <strong>of</strong> adventitious rooting <strong>of</strong> Taxus<br />
species by thiamine. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 14, 753-757.<br />
CHEE R.P., SCHULTHEIS J.R. & CANTCLIFFE D.J. 1990 <strong>Plant</strong><br />
recovery from sweet potato somatic embryos. HortScience 25,<br />
795-797.<br />
CHENG T.-Y. & VOQUI T.H. 1977 Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Douglas fir<br />
plantlets through tissue culture. Science 198, 306-307.<br />
CHENG T.-Y. 1978 Clonal propagation <strong>of</strong> woody species through<br />
tissue culture techniques. Comb. Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. 28,<br />
139-155.<br />
CHEVRE A.-M., GILL S.S., MOURAS A. & SALESSES G. 1983<br />
In vitro multiplication <strong>of</strong> chestnut. J. Hortic. Sci. 58, 23-29.<br />
CHIEN Y.C. & KAO K.N. 1983 Effects <strong>of</strong> osmolality, cytokinin<br />
and organic acids on pollen callus formation in Triticale anthers.<br />
Can. J. Bot. 61, 639-641.<br />
CHIN C. & MILLER D. 1982 Some characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
phosphate uptake by Petunia cells. HortScience 17, 488.<br />
CHIN C.-K., KONG Y. & PEDERSEN H. 1988 <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
droplets containing asparagus cells and protoplasts on polypropylene<br />
membrane. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 15, 59-65.<br />
CHOI H.J., TAO B.Y. & OKOS M.R. 1995 Enhancement <strong>of</strong><br />
secondary metabolite production by immobilized Gossypium<br />
arboreum cells. Biotechnol. Progr. 11, 306-311.<br />
CHONG C. & PUA E.-C. 1985 Carbon nutrition <strong>of</strong> Ottawa 3 apple<br />
rootstock during stages <strong>of</strong> in vitro propagation. J. Hortic. Sci. 60,<br />
285-290.<br />
CHONG C. & TAPER C.D. 1972 Malus tissue culture. I. Sorbitol<br />
(D-glucitol) as carbon source for callus initiation and growth.<br />
Can. J. Bot. 50, 1399-1404.<br />
CHONG C. & TAPER C.D. 1974a Malus tissue cultures. <strong>II</strong>. Sorbitol<br />
metabolism and carbon nutrition. Can. J. Bot. 52, 2361-2364.<br />
CHONG C. & TAPER C.D. 1974b Influence <strong>of</strong> light intensity on<br />
sorbitol metabolism, growth and chlorophyll content <strong>of</strong> Malus<br />
tissue cultures. Ann. Bot. 38, 359-362.<br />
CHU C.-C., WANG C.-C., SUN C.-S., HSU C., YIN K.-C., CHU<br />
C.-Y. & BI F.-Y. 1975 Establishment <strong>of</strong> an efficient medium for<br />
anther culture <strong>of</strong> rice, through comparative experiments on the<br />
nitrogen sources. Sci.Sinica 18, 659-668.<br />
CHUA S.E. 1966 Studies on tissue culture <strong>of</strong> Hevea brasiliensis. I.<br />
Role <strong>of</strong> osmotic concentration, carbohydrate and pH value in<br />
induction <strong>of</strong> callus growth in plumule tissue from Hevea<br />
seedling. J. Rubber Res. Inst. Malaya 19, 272-276.<br />
CHUANG C.-C., OUYANG T.-W., CHIA H., CHOU S.-M. &<br />
CHING C.-K. 1978 A set <strong>of</strong> potato media for wheat anther
160 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
culture. pp. 51-56 in <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Peking Symposium 1978. Pitman, Boston, London, Melbourne.<br />
CHUONG P.V. & BEVERSDORF W.D. 1985 High frequency<br />
embryogenesis through isolated microspore culture in Brassica<br />
napus L and B. carinata Braun. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 39, 219-226.<br />
CLELAND R. 1977 <strong>The</strong> control <strong>of</strong> cell enlargement. pp. 101-115<br />
in Jennings D.H. (ed.) S.E.B. Symp. 31. University Press,<br />
Cambridge.<br />
COFFIN R., TAPER C.D. & CHONG C. 1976 Sorbitol and<br />
sucrose as carbon source for callus culture <strong>of</strong> some species <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Rosaceae. Can. J. Bot. 54, 547-551.<br />
CONNER A.J. & FALLOON P.G. 1993 Osmotic versus<br />
nutritional effects when rooting in vitro asparagus minicrowns on<br />
high sucrose. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 89, 101-106.<br />
CONNER A.J. & MEREDITH C.P. 1984 An improved<br />
polyurethane support system for monitoring growth in plant cell<br />
cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 3, 59-68.<br />
CONRAD P.L., CONRAD J.M., DURBIN R.D. & HELGESON J.P.<br />
1981 Effects <strong>of</strong> some organic buffers on division <strong>of</strong> protoplastderived<br />
cells and plant regeneration. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 67, Suppl., 116.<br />
COOPER A. 1979 <strong>The</strong> ABC <strong>of</strong> NFT. Grower Books, London.<br />
ISBN 0 901 361224.<br />
COPPING L.G. & STREET H.E. 1972 Properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
invertases <strong>of</strong> cultured sycamore cells and changes in their activity<br />
during culture growth. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 26, 346-354.<br />
CULAFIC L., BUDIMIR S., VUJICIC R. & NESKOVIC M. 1987<br />
Induction <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis and embryo development in<br />
Rumex acetosella L. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 11, 133-139.<br />
DABIN P. & BEGUIN F. 1987 Somatic embryogenesis in<br />
Fuchsia. Acta Hortic. 212, 725-726.<br />
DAIGNY G., PAUL H. & SANGWAN-NORRELL B.S. 1996<br />
Factors influencing secondaru somatic embryogenesis in Malus x<br />
domestica Borkh. (cv ‘Gloster 69’). <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 16, 153-157.<br />
DALTON C.C., IQBAL K. & TURNER D.A. 1983 Iron phosphate<br />
precipitation in Murashige and Skoog media. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 57,<br />
472-476.<br />
DAMIANO C., CURIR P. & COSMI T. 1987 Short note on the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> sugar on the growth <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus gunnii in vitro. Acta<br />
Hortic. 212, 553-556.<br />
DANTU P.K. & BHOJWANI S.S. 1995 In vitro corm formation<br />
and field evaluation <strong>of</strong> corm-derived plants <strong>of</strong> Gladiolus. Sci.<br />
Hortic. 61, 115-129.<br />
DAS R., BAGGA S. & SOPORY S.K. 1987 Involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphoinositides, calmodulin and glyoxidase-1 in cell<br />
proliferation in callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Amaranthus paniculatus. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Sci. 53, 45-51.<br />
DAS T., MITRA G.C. & CHATTERJEE A. 1995 Micropropagation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Citrus sinensis var. mosambi: an important scion.<br />
Phytomorph. 45, 57-64.<br />
DAVIS M.J., BAKER R. & HANAN J.J. 1977 Clonal multiplication<br />
<strong>of</strong> carnation by micropropagation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic.<br />
Sci. 102, 48-53.<br />
DAY D. 1942 Thiamin content <strong>of</strong> agar. B. Torrey Bot. Club 69,<br />
11-20.<br />
DE BRUYN M.H. AND FERREIRA D.I. 1992 In vitro corm<br />
production <strong>of</strong> Gladiolus dalenii and G. tristis. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 31, 123-128.<br />
DE CAPITE L. 1948 pH <strong>of</strong> nutritive solutions and its influence on<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> plants. Ann. Fac. Agrar. Univ. Perugia 5,<br />
135-145.<br />
DE CAPITE L. 1952a Combined action <strong>of</strong> p-aminobenzoic acid and<br />
indoleacetic acid on the vascular parenchyma <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem<br />
artichoke cultured in vitro. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. 146, 863-865.<br />
DE CAPITE L. 1952b Action <strong>of</strong> p-aminophenylsulphonamide and<br />
p-amino-benzoic acid on the vascular parenchyma <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem<br />
artichoke and <strong>of</strong> crown-gall tissue <strong>of</strong> salsify. Compt. Rend. Acad.<br />
Sci. Paris 234, 2478-2480.<br />
DE FOSSARD R.A., MYINT A. & LEE E.C.M. 1974 A broad<br />
spectrum tissue culture experiment with tobacco (Nicotiana<br />
tabacum) pith tissue callus. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 31, 125-130.<br />
DE JONG A.W. & BRUINSMA J. 1974 Pistil development in<br />
Cleome flowers <strong>II</strong>I. Effects <strong>of</strong> growth-regulating substances on<br />
flower buds <strong>of</strong> Cleome iberidella Welv. ex Oliv. grown in vitro.<br />
Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 73, 142-151.<br />
DE JONG A.W., SMIT A.L. & BRUINSMA J. 1974 Pistil<br />
development in Cleome flowers <strong>II</strong>. Effects <strong>of</strong> nutrients on flower<br />
buds <strong>of</strong> Cleome iberidella Welv. ex Oliv. grown in vitro. Z.<br />
Pflanzenphysiol. 72, 227-236.<br />
DE KLERK G.J., HANECAKOVA J. & JASIK J. 2007 Effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> medium-pH on adventitious root formation from thin stem<br />
disks cut from apple microshoots. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ<br />
Cult. (in press)<br />
DE KLERK-KIEBERT Y.M. & VAN DER PLAS L.H.W. 1985<br />
Relationship <strong>of</strong> respiratory pathways in soybean cell suspensions<br />
to growth <strong>of</strong> the cells at various glucose concentrations. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 4, 225-233.<br />
DE KRUIJFF E. 1906 Composition <strong>of</strong> coconut water and presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> diastase in coconuts. B. Dep. Agric. Indes Neerland. 4, 1-8.<br />
DE PASQUALE F., CARIMI F. & CRESCIMANNO F.G. 1994<br />
Somatic embryogenesis from styles <strong>of</strong> different cultivars <strong>of</strong><br />
Citrus limon (L.) Burm. Aust. J. Bot, 42, 587-594.<br />
DE PINTO M.C., FRANCIS D. & DE GARA D. 1999 <strong>The</strong> redox<br />
state <strong>of</strong> the ascorbate-dehydroascrobate pair as a specific sensor<br />
<strong>of</strong> cell division in tobacco BY-2 cells. Protoplasma 209, 90-97.<br />
DEBERGH P.C. 1983 Effects <strong>of</strong> agar brand and concentration on<br />
the tissue culture medium. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 59, 270-276.<br />
DEBERGH P., AITKEN-CHRISTIE J., COHEN D., GROUT B.,<br />
VON ARNOLD S., ZIMMERMAN R. & ZIV M. 1992 Reconsideration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the term ‘vitrification’ as used in micropropagation.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 30, 135-140.<br />
DEBERGH P., HARBAOUI Y. & LEMEUR R. 1981. Mass<br />
propagation <strong>of</strong> globe artichoke (Cyanara scolymus): evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special<br />
reference to water potential. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 53, 181-187<br />
DELBARRE A., MULLER P., IMHOFF V. & GUERN J. 1996<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> mechanisms controlling uptake and accumulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, naphthalene-1-acetic acid,<br />
and indole-3-acetic acid in suspension-cultured tobacco cells.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>a 198, 532-541.<br />
DELFEL N.E. & SMITH L.J. 1980 <strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> culture conditions<br />
and medium component interactions on the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Cephalotaxus harringtonia tissue cultures. <strong>Plant</strong>a Medica 40,<br />
237-244.<br />
DIGBY J. & SKOOG F. 1966 Cytokinin activation <strong>of</strong> thiamine<br />
biosynthesis in tobacco callus cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 41, 647-652.<br />
DIJKEMA C., BOOIJ H., DE JAGER P.A., DE VRIES S.C.,<br />
SCHAAFSMA T.J. & VAN KAMMEN A. 1990 Aerobic hexose<br />
metabolism in embryogenic cell lines <strong>of</strong> Daucus carota studied<br />
by 13 C NMR using 13 C-enriched substrates. pp. 343-348 in<br />
Nijkamp et al. (eds.) 1990 (q.v.).<br />
DIX L. & VAN STADEN J. 1982 Auxin and gibberellin-like<br />
substances in coconut milk and malt extract. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 1, 239-245.<br />
DOLEY D. & LEYTON L. 1970 Effects <strong>of</strong> growth regulating<br />
substances and water potential on the development <strong>of</strong> wound<br />
callus in Fraxinus. New Phytol. 69, 87-102.<br />
DORAN P.M. 1993 Design <strong>of</strong> bioreactors for plant cells and<br />
organs. pp 116-169 in Fiechter A. (ed.) Bioprocess design and<br />
control. Vol. 48 Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 116-169.
DOUGALL D.K. 1980 Nutrition and Metabolism. <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
<strong>Culture</strong> as a Source <strong>of</strong> Biochemicals. C.R.C. Press, Boca Raton,<br />
Florida.<br />
DOUGALL D.K., WEYRAUCH K.W. & ALTON W. 1979 <strong>The</strong><br />
effects <strong>of</strong> organic acids on growth and anthocyanin production by<br />
wild carrot cells growing on ammonia as a sole nitrogen source.<br />
In Vitro 15, 189-190 (Abst. 103).<br />
DOUGLAS T.J., VILLALOBOS V.M., THOMPSON M.R. &<br />
THORPE T.A. 1982 Lipid and pigment changes during shootinititaion<br />
in cultured explants <strong>of</strong> Pinus radiata. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>.<br />
55, 470-477.<br />
DOVZHENKO A., BERGEN U. & KOOP H.U. 1998 Thinalginate-layer<br />
technique for protoplast culture <strong>of</strong> tobacco leaf<br />
protoplasts: shoot formation in less than two weeks. Protoplasma<br />
204, 114-118.<br />
DREW R.A. & SMITH N.G. 1986 Growth <strong>of</strong> apical and lateral<br />
buds <strong>of</strong> pawpaw (Carica papaya L.) as affected by nutritional<br />
and hormonal factors. J. Hortic. Sci. 61, 535-543.<br />
DREW R.A., MCCOMB J.A. & CONSIDINE J.A. 1993<br />
Rhizogenesis and root growth <strong>of</strong> Carica papaya L. in vitro in<br />
relation to auxin sensitive phases and use <strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lavin. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 33, 1-7.<br />
DRUART PH. 1988 Regulation <strong>of</strong> axillary branching in<br />
micropropagation <strong>of</strong> woody fruit species. Acta Hortic. 227,<br />
369-380.<br />
DUHAMET L. & MENTZER C. 1955 Essais d’isolement des<br />
substances excito-formatrices du lait de coco. Compt. Rend.<br />
Acad. Sci. Paris 241, 86-88.<br />
DUNSTAN D.I. 1982 Transplantation and post-transplantation <strong>of</strong><br />
micropropagated tree-fruit rootstocks. Comb. Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Prop. Soc., 1981 31, 39-44.<br />
DUNSTAN W.R. 1906 Report on a sample <strong>of</strong> coconut “water”<br />
from Ceylon. Trop. Agric. (Ceylon) 26, 377-378.<br />
DUNWELL J.M. 1981 Influence <strong>of</strong> genotype and environment on<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> barley Hordeum vulgare embryos in vitro. Ann. Bot.<br />
48, 535-542.<br />
EMONS A.M.C., SAMALLO-DROPPERS A. & VAN DER<br />
TOORN C. 1993 <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> sucrose, mannitol, L-proline,<br />
abscisic acid and gibberellic acid on the maturation <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryos <strong>of</strong> Zea mays L. from suspension cultures. J. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Physiol. 142, 597-604.<br />
EARLE E.D. & TORREY J.G. 1965 Colony formation by isolated<br />
Convolvulus cells plated on defined media. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 40,<br />
520-528.<br />
EDELMAN J. & HANSON A.D. 1972 Sucrose suppression <strong>of</strong><br />
chlorophyll synthesis in carrot-tissue cultures. J. Exp. Bot. 23,<br />
469-478.<br />
EDWARDS K.J. & GOLDSMITH M.H.M. 1980 pH-dependent<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> indoleacetic acid by corn coleoptile sections.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>a 147, 457-466.<br />
EINSET J.W. 1978 Citrus tissue culture - stimulation <strong>of</strong> fruit<br />
explant cultures with orange juice. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 62, 885-888.<br />
EL HINNAWIY E. 1974 Effect <strong>of</strong> some growth regulating<br />
substances and carbohydrates on chlorophyll production in<br />
Melilotus alba (Desr.) callus tissue cultures. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.<br />
74, 95-105.<br />
ERNER Y. & REUVENI O. 1981 Promotion <strong>of</strong> citrus tissue<br />
culture by citric acid. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 67, Suppl., 27.<br />
ERNER Y. & REUVENI O. 1981 Promotion <strong>of</strong> citrus tissue<br />
culture by citric acid. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 67, Suppl., 27.<br />
ERNST R. 1967 Effects <strong>of</strong> carbohydrate selection on the growth<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> freshly germinated Phalaenopsis and Dendrobium seed.<br />
Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 36, 1068-1073.<br />
ERNST R. 1974 <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> activated charcoal in asymbiotic<br />
seedling culture <strong>of</strong> Paphiopedilum. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 43,<br />
35-38.<br />
Chapter 4 161<br />
ERNST R., ARDITTI J. & HEALEY P.L. 1971 Carbohydrate<br />
physiology <strong>of</strong> orchid seedlings. <strong>II</strong>. Hydrolysis and effects <strong>of</strong><br />
oligosaccharides. Am. J. Bot. 58, 827-835.<br />
EVANS D.A., SHARP W.R. & PADDOCK E.F. 1976 Variation in<br />
callus proliferation and root morphogenesis in leaf tissue cultures<br />
<strong>of</strong> Glycine max strain T 219. Phytomorph. 26, 379-384.<br />
FELLE H.H. 1998. <strong>The</strong> apoplastic pH <strong>of</strong> the Zea mays root cortex<br />
as measured with pH-sensitive microelectrodes: aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 987-995.<br />
FELLE H.H. 2001 pH: Signal and messenger in plant cells. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Biol. 3, 577-591.<br />
FELLE H.H. & HANSTEIN S. 2002 <strong>The</strong> apoplastic pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />
substomatal cavity <strong>of</strong> Vicia faba leaves and its regulation<br />
responding to different stress factors. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 73-82.<br />
FERGUSON J.D., STREET H.E. & DAVID S.B. 1958 <strong>The</strong> carbohydrate<br />
nutrition <strong>of</strong> tomato roots. V. <strong>The</strong> promotion and<br />
inhibition <strong>of</strong> excised root growth by various sugars and sugar<br />
alcohols. Ann. Bot. 22, 513-524.<br />
FINDENEGG G.R., VAN BEUSICHEM M.L. & KELTJENS<br />
W.G. 1986 Proton balance <strong>of</strong> plants: physiological, agronomical<br />
and economical implications. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 34, 371-379.<br />
FINNIE S.J., POWELL W. & DYER A.F. 1989 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />
carbohydrate composition and concentration on anther culture<br />
response in barley. <strong>Plant</strong> Breeding 103, 110-118.<br />
FONNESBECH M. 1972 Organic nutrients in the media for the<br />
propagation <strong>of</strong> Cymbidium in vitro. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 27, 360-364.<br />
FOX J.E. & MILLER C. 1959 Factors in corn steep water<br />
promoting growth <strong>of</strong> plant tissues. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 34, 577-579.<br />
FUGGI A., RUGANO V.M., VONA V. & RIGANO C. 1981<br />
Nitrate and ammonium assimilation in algae cell-suspensions and<br />
related pH variations in the external medium, monitored by<br />
electrodes. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 23, 129-138.<br />
FUJIWARA A. (ed.) 1982 <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> 1982. Proc. 5th.<br />
Int. Cong. <strong>Plant</strong> Tiss. Cell Cult., Japan. Assoc. <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
<strong>Culture</strong>, Japan.<br />
FUJIWARA K. & KOZAI T. 1995 Physical microenvironment and<br />
its effects. pp. 319-369 in Aitken-Christie J., Kozai T. and Smith<br />
M.L. (eds.) Automation and Environmental Control in <strong>Plant</strong><br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>. Kluwer Academic Publishers, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands.<br />
FUKAMI T. & HILDEBRANDT A.C. 1967 Growth and chlorophyll<br />
formation in edible green plant callus tissues in vitro on<br />
media with limited sugar supplements. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 80,<br />
199-212.<br />
FURGUSON J.D. 1967 <strong>The</strong> nutrition <strong>of</strong> excised wheat roots.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 20, 276-284.<br />
GALIBA G. & ERDEI L. 1986 Dependence <strong>of</strong> wheat callus<br />
growth, differentiation and mineral content on carbohydrate<br />
supply. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 45, 65-70.<br />
GALIBA G. & YAMADA Y. 1988 A novel method for increasing<br />
the frequency <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis in wheat tissue culture<br />
by NaCl and KCl supplementation. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 7, 55-58.<br />
GAMBORG O.L. & SHYLUK J.P. 1970 <strong>The</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> plant cells<br />
with ammonium salts as a sole nitrogen source. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 45,<br />
598-600.<br />
GAMBORG O.L., CONSTABEL F. & SHYLUK J.P. 1974<br />
Organogenesis in callus from shoot apices <strong>of</strong> Pisum sativum.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 30, 125-128.<br />
GAMBORG O.L., MILLER R.A. & OJIMA K. 1968 Nutrient<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> soybean root cells. Exp.<br />
Cell Res. 50, 151-158.<br />
GAMBORG O.L., MILLER R.A. & OJIMA K. 1968 Nutrient<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> soybean root cells. Exp.<br />
Cell Res. 50, 151-158.<br />
GARIN E., BERNIER-CARDOU M. , ISABEL N.,<br />
KLIMASZEWSKA K. & PLOURDE A. 2000 Effect <strong>of</strong> sugars,<br />
amino acids and culture technique on maturation <strong>of</strong> somatic
162 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
embryos <strong>of</strong> Pinus strobus on medium with two gellan gum<br />
concentrations. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 62, 27-37.<br />
GASPAR T., KEVERS C., DEBERGH P., MAENE L., PAQUES<br />
M. & BOXUS P. 1987 Vitrification: morphological, physiological<br />
and ecological aspects. in Bonga J.M. and Durzan D.J.<br />
(eds.) Cell and <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> in Forestry Vol. 1 Kluwer<br />
Academic Press Publ., Dordrecht.<br />
GAUTHERET R.J. 1942 Manuel Technique de <strong>Culture</strong> des <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Végétaux. Masson et Cie, Paris.<br />
GAUTHERET R.J. 1945 Une voie nouvelle en biologie végétale:<br />
la culture des tissus. Gallimard, Paris.<br />
GAUTHERET R.J. 1948 Sur la culture indéfinie des tissus de Salix<br />
caprea. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. 142, 807.<br />
GAWEL N.J., RAO A.P. & ROBACKER C.D. 1986 Somatic<br />
embryogenesis from leaf and petiole callus cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
Gossypium hirsutum L. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 5, 457-459.<br />
GAWEL N.J. & ROBACKER C.D. 1990 Somatic embryogenesis<br />
in two Gossypium hirsutum genotypes on semi-solid versus<br />
liquid proliferation media. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult.23,<br />
201-204.<br />
GEORGE E.F., PUTTOCK D.J.M. & GEORGE H.J. 1987 <strong>Plant</strong><br />
<strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> Vol.1. Exegetics Ltd., Westbury, England.<br />
GERRITS M. & DE KLERK G.J. 1992 Dry-matter partitioning<br />
between bulbs and leaves in plantlets <strong>of</strong> Lilium speciosum<br />
regenerated in vitro. Acta Bot. Neerl. 41, 461-468.<br />
GLASSTONE S. 1946 Textbook <strong>of</strong> Physical Chemistry. Second<br />
Edition. MacMillan, London.<br />
GOLDSCHMIDT E.E. 1976 Edogenous growth substances <strong>of</strong><br />
citrus tissues. HortScience 11, 95-99.<br />
GOOD N.E., WINGET G.D., WINTER W., CONNOLLY T.N.,<br />
IZAWA S. & SINGH R.M. 1966 Hydrogen ion buffers for<br />
biological research. Biochemistry 5, 467-477.<br />
GOODWIN P.B. 1966 An improved medium for the rapid growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> isolated potato buds. J. Exp. Bot. 17, 590-595.<br />
GOPAL J., CHAMAIL A. & SARKAR D. 2002 Slow-growth in<br />
vitro conservation <strong>of</strong> potato germplasm at normal propagation<br />
temperature. Pot. Res. 45, 203-213.<br />
GRANATEK C.H. & COCKERLINE A.W. 1978 Callus formation<br />
versus differentiation <strong>of</strong> cultured barley embryos: hormonal<br />
osmotic interactions. In Vitro 14, 212-217.<br />
GRAY D.J., CONGER B.V. & SONGSTAD D.D. 1987<br />
Desiccated quiescent somatic embryos <strong>of</strong> orchard grass for use as<br />
synthetic seeds. In Vitro Cell. Dev. 23, 29-32.<br />
GRIBBLE K. 1999 <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> relative humidity on<br />
vitrification, growth and morphology <strong>of</strong> Gypsophila paniculata<br />
L. <strong>Plant</strong> Growth Regul. 27, 179-188.<br />
GROOTAARTS H., SCHEL J.H.N. & PIERIK R.L.M. 1981 <strong>The</strong><br />
origin <strong>of</strong> bulblets formed on excised twin scales <strong>of</strong> Nerine<br />
bowdenii W. Watts. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 1, 39-46.<br />
GROSS K.C., PHARR D.M. & LOCY R.D. 1981 Growth <strong>of</strong> callus<br />
initiated from cucumber hypocotyls on galactose and galactosecontaining<br />
oligosaccharides. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 20, 333-341.<br />
GUHA S. & JOHRI B.M. 1966 In vitro development <strong>of</strong> overy and<br />
ovule <strong>of</strong> Allium cepa L. Phytomorph. 16, 353-364.<br />
GUHA S. & MAHESHWARI S.C. 1964 In vitro production <strong>of</strong><br />
embryos from anthers <strong>of</strong> Datura. Nature 204, 497.<br />
GUHA S. & MAHESHWARI S.C. 1967 Development <strong>of</strong><br />
embryoids from pollen grains <strong>of</strong> Datura in vitro. Phytomorph.<br />
17, 454-461.<br />
GUNNING B.E.S. & STEER M.W. 1975 Ultrastructure and the<br />
Biology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> Cells. Arnold, London.<br />
GUPTA P.K. & DURZAN D.J. 1985 Shoot multiplication from<br />
mature trees <strong>of</strong> Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar<br />
pine (Pinus lambertiana). <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 4, 177-179.<br />
GUPTA P.K., DANDEKAR A.M. & DURZAN D.J. 1988 Somatic<br />
proembryo formation and transient expression <strong>of</strong> a luciferase<br />
gene in Douglas fir and loblolly pine protoplasts. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 58,<br />
85-92.<br />
GUTMAN T.S. & SHIRYAEVA G.A. 1980 New method for<br />
growing cultures <strong>of</strong> isolated tissues <strong>of</strong> higher plants. Rastit.<br />
Resur. 16, 601-606.<br />
HACKETT D.P. 1952 <strong>The</strong> osmotic change during auxin-induced<br />
water uptake by potato tissue. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 27, 279-284.<br />
HAKKAART F.A. & VERSLUIJS J.M.A. 1983 Some factors<br />
affecting glassiness in carnation meristem tip cultures. Neth. J.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Path. 89, 47-53.<br />
HALPERIN W. & WETHERELL D.F. 1964 Adventive embryony<br />
in tissue cultures <strong>of</strong> the wild carrot, Daucus carota. Am. J. Bot.<br />
51, 274-283.<br />
HAMAOKA Y., FUJITA Y. & IWAI S. 1991 Effects <strong>of</strong><br />
temperature on the mode <strong>of</strong> pollen development in anther culture<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brassica campestris. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 82, 67-72.<br />
HAMMERSLEY-STRAW D.R.H. & THORPE T.A. 1988 Use <strong>of</strong><br />
osmotic inhibition in studies <strong>of</strong> shoot formation in tobacco callus<br />
cultures. Bot. Gaz. 149, 303-310.<br />
HARBAGE J.F., STIMART D.P. & AUER C. 1998 pH affects<br />
1H-indole-3-butyric acid uptake but not metabolism during the<br />
initiation phase <strong>of</strong> adventitious root induction in apple<br />
microcuttings. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 123, 6-10.<br />
HARDING K., BENSON E.E. & CLACHER K. 1997 <strong>Plant</strong><br />
conservation biotechnology: an overview. Agro Food Ind. Hi<br />
Tech. 8, 24-29.<br />
HARRAN S. & DICKINSON D.B. 1978 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> myoinositol<br />
and growth in various sugars <strong>of</strong> suspension cultured<br />
cells. <strong>Plant</strong>a 141, 77-82.<br />
HARRINGTON H.M. & HENKE R.R. 1981 Amino acid transport<br />
into cultured tobacco cells. I. Lysine transport. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 67,<br />
373-378.<br />
HARRIS R.E. & STEVENSON J.H. 1979 Virus elimination and<br />
rapid propagation <strong>of</strong> grapes in vitro. Comb. Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop.<br />
Soc. 29, 95-108.<br />
HARVAIS G. 1982 An improved medium for growing the orchid<br />
Cypripedium reginae axenically. Can. J. Bot. 60, 2547-2555.<br />
HELGESON J.P., UPPER C.D. & HABERLACH G.T. 1972<br />
Medium and tissue sugar concentrations during cytokinincontrolled<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> tobacco callus tissues. pp. 484-492 in Carr<br />
D.J. (ed.) <strong>Plant</strong> Growth Substances 1970. Springer Verlag,<br />
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.<br />
HELLER R. & GAUTHERET R.J. 1949 Sur l’emploi de papier<br />
filtre sans cendres commes support pour les cultures de tissues<br />
végétaux. Compt. Rend. Seance Soc. Biol., Paris 143, 335-337.<br />
HENDERSON W.E. & KINNERSLEY A.M. 1988 Corn starch as<br />
an alternative gelling agent for plant tissue culture. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 15, 17-22.<br />
HESS D., LEIPOLDT G. & ILLG R.D. 1979 Investigations on the<br />
lactose induction <strong>of</strong> β-galactosides activity in callus tissue<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Nemesia strumosa and Petunia hybrida. Z.<br />
Pflanzenphysiol. 94, 45-53.<br />
HEW C.S., TING S.K. & CHIA T.F. 1988 Substrate utilization by<br />
Dendrobium tissues. Bot. Gaz. 149, 153-157.<br />
HILDEBRANDT A.C., RIKER A.J. & DUGGAR B.M. 1946 <strong>The</strong><br />
influence <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the medium on growth in vitro <strong>of</strong><br />
excised tobacco and sunflower tissue cultures. Am. J. Bot. 33,<br />
591-597.<br />
HILDEBRANDT A.C., WILMAR J.C., JOHNS H. & RIKER A.J.<br />
1963 Growth <strong>of</strong> edible chlorophyllous plant tissues in vitro. Am.<br />
J. Bot. 50, 248-254.<br />
HISAJIMA S. & THORPE T.A. 1981 Lactose-adapted cultured<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> Japanese morning-glory. Acta Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 3, 187-191.<br />
HISAJIMA S. & THORPE T.A. 1985 Lactose metabolism in<br />
lactose-adapted cells <strong>of</strong> Japanese morning-glory. J. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Physiol. 118, 145-151.
HISAJIMA S., ARAI Y. & ITO T. 1978 Changes in sugar<br />
contents and some enzyme activities during growth <strong>of</strong> morningglory<br />
callus (In Japanese). J. Jpn. Soc. Starch Sci. 25, 223-228.<br />
HO W.-J. & VASIL I.K. 1983 Somatic embryogenesis in<br />
sugarcane (Saccharum <strong>of</strong>ficinarum L.): Growth and plant<br />
regeneration from embryogenic cell suspension cultures. Ann.<br />
Bot. 51, 719-726.<br />
HOMÈS J. & VANSVEREN-VAN ESPEN N. 1973 Effets du<br />
saccharose et de la lumière sur le développement et la<br />
morphologie de protocormes d’Orchides cultivés in vitro. Bull.<br />
Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 106, 89-106.<br />
HOOKER T.S. & THORPE T.A. 1997 Effects <strong>of</strong> water deficit<br />
stress on the developmental growth <strong>of</strong> excised tomato roots<br />
cultured in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev.-Pl. 33, 245-251.<br />
HORAN I., WALKER S., ROBERTS A.V., MOTTLEY J. &<br />
SIMPKINS I. 1995 Micropropagation <strong>of</strong> roses: the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
pruned mother-plantlets at Stage <strong>II</strong> and a greenhouse<br />
environment at stage <strong>II</strong>I. J. Hortic. Sci., 70, 799-806.<br />
HOWARD B.H. & MARKS T.R. 1987 <strong>The</strong> in vitro - in vivo<br />
interface. pp. 101-111 in Jackson M.B., Mantell S.H. & Blake J.<br />
(eds.) Advances in the Chemical Manipulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
<strong>Culture</strong>s. Monograph 16, British <strong>Plant</strong> Growth Regulator Group,<br />
Bristol.<br />
HU T.C., ZIAUDDIN A., SIMION E. & KASHA K.J. 1995 Isolated<br />
microscopore culture <strong>of</strong> wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a<br />
defined media. I: Effects <strong>of</strong> pretreatment, isolation methods, and<br />
hormones. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., <strong>Plant</strong>. 31, 79-83.<br />
HUANG B., BIRD S., KEMBLE R., MIKI B. & KELLER W.<br />
1991 <strong>Plant</strong> regeneration from microspore-derived embryos <strong>of</strong><br />
Brassica napus: effect <strong>of</strong> embryo age, culture temperature,<br />
osmotic pressure and abscisic acid. In Vitro Cell. Dev. <strong>Plant</strong> 27,<br />
28-31.<br />
HUSEMANN W., AMINO S., FISCHER K., HERZBECK H. &<br />
CALLIS R. 1990 Light dependent growth and differentiation<br />
processes in photoautotrophic cell cultures. pp. 373-378 in<br />
Nijkamp et al. (eds.) 1990 (q.v.).<br />
HYNDMAN S.E., HASEGAWA P.M. & BRESSAN R.A. 1982 <strong>The</strong><br />
role <strong>of</strong> sucrose and nitrogen in adventitious root formation on<br />
cultured rose shoots. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 1, 229-238.<br />
ICHI T., KODA T., ASAI I., HATANAKA A. & SEKIYA J. 1986<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> gelling agents on in vitro culture <strong>of</strong> plant tissues.<br />
Agric. Biol. Chem. 50, 2397-2399.<br />
ICHIMURA K. & ODA M. 1995 Stimulation <strong>of</strong> root growth in<br />
several vegetables by wood pulp extract. J. Jpn Soc. Hortic. Sci.<br />
63 (Suppl. 4), 797-803.<br />
IKEDA-IWAI, M., UMEHARA M., SATOH S. & KAMADA H.<br />
2003 Stress-induced somatic embryogenesis in vegetative tissues<br />
<strong>of</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana. <strong>Plant</strong> J. 34, 107-114.<br />
ILIĆ-GRUBOR K., ATTREE S. M. & FOWKE L. C. 1998<br />
Induction <strong>of</strong> microspore-derived embryos <strong>of</strong> Brassica napus L.<br />
with polyethylene glycol (PEG) as osmoticum in a low sucrose<br />
medium <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 17, 329-333.<br />
IMAMURA J. &. HARADA H. 1980. Effects <strong>of</strong> abscisic acid and<br />
water stress on the embryo and plantlet formation in anther<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.<br />
100, 285-289.<br />
IMAMURA J., OKABE E., KYO M. & HARADA H. 1982<br />
Embryogenesis and plantlet formation through direct culture <strong>of</strong><br />
isolated pollen <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsum and Nicotiana<br />
rustica cv. rustica. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Physiol. 23, 713-716.<br />
INOUE M. & MAEDA E. 1982 Control <strong>of</strong> organ formation in rice<br />
callus using two-step culture method. pp. 183-184 in Fujiwara A.<br />
(ed.) 1982 (q.v.).<br />
ISHIHARA A. & KATANO M. 1982 Propagation <strong>of</strong> apple<br />
cultivars and rootstocks by shoot-tip culture. pp. 733-734 in<br />
Fujiwara A. (ed.) 1982 (q.v.).<br />
Chapter 4 163<br />
JACOBSON L., COOPER B.R. & VOLZ M.G. 1971 <strong>The</strong><br />
interaction <strong>of</strong> pH and aeration in Cl uptake by barley roots.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 25, 432-435.<br />
JACQUIOT C. 1951 Action <strong>of</strong> meso-inositol and <strong>of</strong> adenine on<br />
bud formation in the cambium tissue <strong>of</strong> Ulmus campestris<br />
cultivated in vitro. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 233, 815-817.<br />
JAIN R.K., DAVEY M.R. COCKING E.C. & WU R. 1997<br />
Carbohydrate and osmotic requirements for high-frequency plant<br />
regeneration from protoplast-derived colonies <strong>of</strong> indica and<br />
japonica rice varieties. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 751-758.<br />
JAY-ALLEMAND C., CAPELLI P. & CORNU D. 1992 Root<br />
development <strong>of</strong> in vitro hybrid walnut microcuttings in a<br />
vermiculite-containing gelrite medium. Sci. Hortic. 51, 335-342.<br />
JEANNIN G., BRONNER R. & HAHNE G. 1995 Somatic<br />
embryogenesis and organogenesis induced on the immature<br />
zygotic embryo <strong>of</strong> sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) cultivated in<br />
vitro: Role <strong>of</strong> Sugar. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 15, 200-204.<br />
JEFFS R.A. & NORTHCOTE D.H. 1967 <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> IAA<br />
and sugar on the pattern <strong>of</strong> induced differentiation in plant tissue<br />
culture. J. Cell Sci. 2, 77-88.<br />
JEONG B.R., FUJIWARA K. & KOZAI T. 1995 Environmental<br />
control and photoautotrophic micropropagation. Hortic. Rev. 17,<br />
123-170.<br />
JOHANSSON L. & ERIKSSON T. 1984 Effects <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide<br />
in anther cultures. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong> 60, 26-30.<br />
JOHNSON J.L. & EMINO E.R. 1979 In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong><br />
Mammillaria elongata. HortScience 14, 605-606.<br />
JOHRI B.M. & GUHA S. 1963 In vitro development <strong>of</strong> onion<br />
plants from flowers. pp. 215-223 in Maheshwari and Ranga<br />
Swamy (eds.) 1963 (q.v.).<br />
JOY IV R.W., PATEL K.R. & THORPE T.A. 1988 Ascorbic acid<br />
enhancement <strong>of</strong> organogenesis in tobacco. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 13, 219-228.<br />
JOY IV R.W., PATEL K.R. & THORPE T.A. 1988 Ascorbic acid<br />
enhancement <strong>of</strong> organogenesis in tobacco callus. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 13, 219-228.<br />
JUMIN H.B. 1995 <strong>Plant</strong> regeneration via somatic embryogenesis<br />
in Citrus and its relatives. Phytomorphology 45, 1-8.<br />
JUNG P., TANNER W. & WOLTER K. 1972 <strong>The</strong> fate <strong>of</strong> myoinositol<br />
in Fraximus tissue cultures. Phytochemistry 11, 1655-1659.<br />
KAHANE R. & RANCILLAC M. 1996 Carbohydrates in onion<br />
cultured in vitro. Acta Bot. Gall. 143, 117-123<br />
KANABUS J., BRESSAN R.A. & CARPITA N.C. 1986 Carbon<br />
assimilation in carrot cells in liquid culture. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 82,<br />
363-368.<br />
KANG K.S., VEEDER G.T., MIRRASOUL P.J., KANEKO T. &<br />
COTTRELL W. 1982 Agar-like polysaccharide produced by a<br />
Pseudomonas species: Production and basic properties. Appl.<br />
Environ. Microbiol. 43, 1086-1091.<br />
KAO K.N. & MICHAYLUK M.R. 1975 Nutritional requirements<br />
for growth <strong>of</strong> Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low<br />
population density in liquid media. <strong>Plant</strong>a 126, 105-110.<br />
KARSAI I., BEDO Z. & HAYES P.M. 1994 Effect <strong>of</strong> induction<br />
medium pH and maltose concentration on in vitro androgenesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> hexaploid winter triticale and wheat. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ<br />
Cult. 39, 49-53.<br />
KARTHA K.K. 1981 Meristem culture and cryopreservation –<br />
Methods and applications. pp. 181-211 in Thorpe T.A. (ed.)<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>: Methods and Applications in Agriculture.<br />
Academic Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney.<br />
KAUL B. & STABA E.J. 1968 Dioscorea tissue cultures. 1.<br />
Biosynthesis and isolation <strong>of</strong> diesgenin from Dioscorea deltoidea<br />
callus and suspension cells. Lloydia 31, 171-179.<br />
KAUL K. & KOCHHAR T.S. 1985 Growth and differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />
callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Pinus. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 4, 180-183.
164 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
KAUL K. & SABHARWAL P.S. 1972 Morphogenetic studies on<br />
Haworthia: Establishment <strong>of</strong> tissue culture and control <strong>of</strong><br />
differentiation. Am. J. Bot. 59, 377-385.<br />
KAUL K. & SABHARWAL P.S. 1975 Morphogenetic studies on<br />
Haworthia: Effects <strong>of</strong> inositol on growth and differentiation. Am.<br />
J. Bot. 62, 655-659.<br />
KAVI KISHOR P.B. & MEHTA A.R. 1982 Some aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
carbohydrate metabolism in organ-differentiating tobacco and<br />
non-differentiating cotton callus cultures. pp. 143-144 in<br />
Fujiwara A. (ed.) 1982 (q.v.).<br />
KAVI KISHOR P.B. & REDDY G.M. 1986 Regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />
plants from long-term cultures <strong>of</strong> Oryza sativa L. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep.<br />
5, 391-393.<br />
KETELLAPPER H.J. 1953 <strong>The</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> the action <strong>of</strong> indole-<br />
3-acetic acid on the water absorption by Avena coleoptile<br />
sections. Acta Bot. Neerl. 2, 387-444.<br />
KIM K.S., DAVELAAR E. & DE KLERK G.J. (1994) Abscisic<br />
acid controls dormancy development and bulb formation in lily<br />
plantlets regenerated in vitro. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 90, 59-64.<br />
KHAN A., CHAUHAN Y.S. & ROBERTS L.W. 1986 In vitro<br />
studies on xylogenesis in citrus-fruit vesicles. 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> pH <strong>of</strong><br />
the nutrient medium on the induction <strong>of</strong> cytodifferentiation. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Sci. 46, 213-216.<br />
KIM Y.-H. & JANICK J. 1989b Somatic embryogenesis and<br />
organogenesis in cucumber. HortScience 24, 702.<br />
KIMBALL S.L., BEVERSDORF W.D. & BINGHAM E.T. 1975<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> osmotic potential on the growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean tissue cultures. Crop Sci. 15, 750-752.<br />
KING P.J. & STREET H.E. 1977 Growth patterns in cell cultures.<br />
pp. 307-387 in Street H.E. (ed.) <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> and Cell <strong>Culture</strong>.<br />
Bot. Monographs Vol.11, Blackwell Scientific Public-ations.<br />
Oxford, London.<br />
KINNERSLEY A.M. & HENDERSON W.E. 1988 Alternative<br />
carbohydrates promote differentiation <strong>of</strong> plant cells. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 15, 17-22.<br />
KINNERSLEY A.M. & HENDERSON W.E. 1988 Alternative<br />
carbohydrates promote differentiation <strong>of</strong> plant cells. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 15, 3-16.<br />
KIRDMANEE C., KITAYA Y. & KOZAI T. 1995. Effects <strong>of</strong> CO2<br />
enrichment and supporting material in-vitro on photoautotrophic<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus plantlets in-vitro and ex-vitro In Vitro Cell.<br />
Dev. –Pl. 31, 144-149<br />
KIRKHAM M.B. & HOLDER P.L. 1981 Water osmotic and turgor<br />
potentials <strong>of</strong> kinetin-treated callus. HortScience 16, 306-307.<br />
KITAMURA Y., IKENAGA T., OOE Y., HIRAOKA N. &<br />
MIZUKAMI H. 1998 Induction <strong>of</strong> furanocoumarin biosynthesis<br />
in Glehnia littoralis cell suspension cultures by elicitor treatment.<br />
Phytochemistry 48, 113-117.<br />
KLEIN R.M. & MANOS G.E. 1960 Use <strong>of</strong> metal chelates for plant<br />
tissue cultures. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 88, 416-425.<br />
KNUDSON L. 1946 A new nutrient solution for the germination <strong>of</strong><br />
orchid seed. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 15, 214-217.<br />
KOCH K.E. 1996 Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in<br />
plants. Annu. Rev. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong> Mol. Biol. 47, 509-540.<br />
KOCHBA J. & BUTTON J. 1974 <strong>The</strong> stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />
embryogenesis and embryoid development in habituated ovular<br />
callus from the ‘Shamouti’ orange (Citrus sinensis) as affected by<br />
tissue age and sucrose concentration. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 73,<br />
415-421.<br />
KOCHBA J., SPIEGEL-ROY P., SAAD S. & NEUMANN H.<br />
1978 Stimulation <strong>of</strong> embryogenesis in Citrus tissue culture by<br />
galactose. Naturwissenschaften 65, 261-262.<br />
KOETJE D.S., GRIMES H.D., WANG Y.-C. & HODGES T.K.<br />
1989 Regeneration <strong>of</strong> indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) from primary<br />
callus from immature embryos. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 13, 184-190.<br />
KOMOR E., ROTTER M. & TANNER W. 1977 A protoncotransport<br />
system in a higher plant: sucrose transport in Ricinus<br />
communis. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 9, 153-162.<br />
KOMOR E., THOM M. & MARETZKI A. 1981 <strong>The</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />
sugar uptake by sugarcane suspension cells. <strong>Plant</strong>a 153, 181-192.<br />
KOOP H.U., WEBER G. & SCHWEIGER H.G. 1983 Individual<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> selected single cells and protoplasts <strong>of</strong> higher plants in<br />
microdroplets <strong>of</strong> defined media. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 112, 21-34.<br />
KORDAN H.A. 1959 Proliferation <strong>of</strong> excised juice vesicles <strong>of</strong><br />
lemon in vitro. Science 129, 779-780.<br />
KOTT L.S. & BEVERSDORF W.D. 1990 Enhanced plant<br />
regeneration from microspore-derived embryos <strong>of</strong> Brassica<br />
napus by chilling, partial desiccation and age selection. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 23, 187-194.<br />
KOZAI T. & SEIKIMOTO K. 1988. Effects <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> air<br />
changes per hour <strong>of</strong> the closed vessel and the photosynthetic<br />
photon flux on the carbon dioxide concentration inside the vessel<br />
and the growth <strong>of</strong> strawberry plantlets in vitro. Environ. Contr.<br />
Biol. 26, 21-29.<br />
KOZAI T., FUJIWARA K. & KITAYA Y. 1995 Modelling,<br />
measurement and control in plant tissue culture. Acta Hortic.<br />
393, 63-73.<br />
KOZAI T. 1991a Photoautotrophic micropropagation. In Vitro<br />
Cell. Dev. – Pl. 27, 47-51.<br />
KOZAI T. 1991b Micropropagation under photoautotrophic<br />
conditions. pp. 447-469 in Debergh P.C. and Zimmerman R.H.<br />
(eds.) Micropropagation. Technology and Application. Kluwer<br />
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London. ISBN 0-7923-<br />
0818-2.<br />
KRIEG N.R. & GERHARDT P. 1981 pp. 143-156 in Gerhardt P.<br />
Murray R.G.E., Costilow R.N., Nester E.W., Wood W.A., Krieg<br />
N.R. and Briggs Phillips G. Manual <strong>of</strong> Methods for General<br />
Bacteriology. Am. Soc. Microbiol. Washington D.C.<br />
KROMER K. & KUKULCZANKA K. 1985 In vitro cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
meristem tips <strong>of</strong> Canna indica L. Acta Hortic. 167, 279-285.<br />
KUMAR A.S., GAMBORG O.L. & NABORS M.W. 1988 <strong>Plant</strong><br />
regeneration from suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> Vigna aconitifolia.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 7, 138-141.<br />
KUNITAKE H., IMAMIZO H. & M<strong>II</strong> M. 1993 Somatic<br />
embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature seedderived<br />
calli <strong>of</strong> rugosa rose (Rosa rugosa Thumb). <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 90,<br />
187-194.<br />
KUNITAKE H., NAKASHIMA T., MORI, K. & TANAKA, M.<br />
1997 Normalization <strong>of</strong> asparagus somatic embryogenesis using a<br />
maltose-containing medium. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 150, 458-461.<br />
KURAISHI S. & OKUMURA F.S. 1961 A new green-leaf growth<br />
stimulating factor, phyllococosine, from coconut milk. Nature<br />
189, 148-149.<br />
KURATA K., IBARAKI Y. & GOTO E. 1991 System for micropropagation<br />
by nutrient mist supply. Trans. ASAE 34, 621-624.<br />
KURITAKE H., NAKASHIMA T., MORI K. & TANAKA M.<br />
1997 Normalization <strong>of</strong> asparagus somatic embryogenesis using a<br />
maltose-containing medium. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 150, 458-461.<br />
KURKDJIAN A., MATHIEU Y. & GUERN J. 1982 Evidence for<br />
an action <strong>of</strong> 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the vacuolar pH<br />
<strong>of</strong> Acer pseudoplatanus cells in suspension culture. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci.<br />
Lett. 27, 77-86.<br />
LA RUE C.D. 1949 <strong>Culture</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the endosperm <strong>of</strong> maize. Am. J.<br />
Bot. 36, 798.<br />
LAMOTTE C.E. 1960 <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> tyrosine and other amino<br />
acids on the formation <strong>of</strong> buds in tobacco callus. Dissertation<br />
Abstracts 21, 31-32.<br />
LANDRY L.G. & SMYTH D.A. 1988 Characterization <strong>of</strong> starch<br />
produced by suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> Indica rice (Oryza sativa L.).<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 15, 23-32.
LANG A.R.G. 1967 Osmotic coefficients and water potentials <strong>of</strong><br />
sodium chloride solutions from 0 to 40ºC. Austr. J. Chem. 20,<br />
2017-2023.<br />
LANGFORD P.J. & WAINWRIGHT H. 1987 Effects <strong>of</strong> sucrose<br />
concentration on the photosynthetic ability <strong>of</strong> rose shoots in vitro.<br />
Ann. Bot. 60, 633-640.<br />
LANGHANSOVÁ L., KONRÁDOVÁ H. & VANĔK T. 2004<br />
Polyethylene glycol and abscisic acid improve maturation and<br />
regeneration <strong>of</strong> Panax ginseng somatic embryos. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep.<br />
22, 725-730.<br />
LAPEÑA L., PÉREZ-BERMÚDEZ P. & SEGURA J. 1988<br />
Morphogenesis in hypocotyl cultures <strong>of</strong> Digitalis obscura:<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> carbohydrate levels and sources. <strong>Plant</strong> Science 57,<br />
247-252.<br />
LARKIN P.J., DAVIES P.A. & TANNER G.J. 1988 Nurse culture<br />
<strong>of</strong> low numbers <strong>of</strong> Medicago and Nicotiana protoplasts using<br />
calcium alginate beads. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 58, 203-210.<br />
LARKIN P.J., DAVIES P.A. & TANNER G.J. 1988. Nurse<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> low numbers <strong>of</strong> Medicago and Nicotiana protoplasts<br />
using calcium alginate beads. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 58, 203-210.<br />
LAROSA P.C., HASEGAWA P.M. & BRESSAN R.A. 1981<br />
Initiation <strong>of</strong> photoautotrophic potato cells. HortScience 16, 433.<br />
LASSOCINSKI W. 1985 Chlorophyll-deficient cacti in tissue<br />
cultures. Acta Hortic. 167, 287-293.<br />
LAZZERI P.A., HILDEBRAND D.F., SUNEGA J., WILLIAMS<br />
E.G. & COLLINS G.B. 1988 Soybean somatic embryogenesis:<br />
interactions between sucrose and auxin. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 7, 517-520.<br />
LEMOS E.E.P. & BLAKE J. 1996 Micropropagation <strong>of</strong> juvenile<br />
and adult Annona squamosa. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 46,<br />
77-79.<br />
LETHAM D.S. 1966 Regulation <strong>of</strong> cell division in plant tissues. <strong>II</strong>.<br />
A cytokinin in plant extracts: isolation and interaction with other<br />
growth regulators. Phytochemistry 5, 269-286.<br />
LETHAM D.S. 1968 A new cytokinin bioassay and the naturally<br />
occurring cytokinin complex. pp. 19-31 in Wightman and<br />
Setterfield (eds.) Biochemistry and Physiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> Growth<br />
Substances. Runge Press, Ottawa.<br />
LETHAM D.S. 1974 Regulators <strong>of</strong> cell division in plant tissues.<br />
XX. <strong>The</strong> cytokinins <strong>of</strong> coconut milk. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 32, 66-70.<br />
LETHAM D.S. 1982 A compound in coconut milk which actively<br />
promoted radish cotyledon expansion, but exhibited negligible<br />
activity in tissue culture bioassays for cytokinins, was identified<br />
as the 6 oxypurine, 2-(3-methylbut-2-enylamino)-purin-6-one.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 26, 241-249.<br />
LEVA A.R., BARROSO M. & MURILLO J.M. 1984 La<br />
moltiplicazione del melo con la tecnica della micropropagazione.<br />
Vriazione del pH in substrati diversi durante la fase di<br />
multiplicazione. Riv. Ort<strong>of</strong>lor<strong>of</strong>rutti. Ital. 68, 483-492.<br />
LI X.Y. & HUANG F.H.. 1996 Induction <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis in Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). In Vitro Cell.<br />
Dev. – Pl. 32, 129-135.<br />
LI X.Y., HUANG F.H., MURPHY J.B. & GBUR E.R. JR. 1998<br />
Polyethylene glycol and maltose enhance somatic embryo<br />
maturation in Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev.<br />
-Pl. 34, 22-26.<br />
LICHTER R. 1981 Anther culture <strong>of</strong> Brassica napus in a liquid<br />
culture medium. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 103, 229-237.<br />
LIMBERG M., CRESS D. & LARK K.G. 1979 Variants <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean cells which can grow in suspension with maltose as a<br />
carbon-energy source. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 63, 718-721.<br />
LIN M.-L. & STABA E.J. 1961 Peppermint and spearmint tissue<br />
cultures. I. Callus formation and submerged culture. Lloydia 24,<br />
139-145.<br />
LINOSSIER L., VEISSEIRE P., CAILLOUX F. & COUDRET A.<br />
1997 Effects <strong>of</strong> abscisic acid and high concentrations <strong>of</strong> PEG on<br />
Chapter 4 165<br />
Hevea brasiliensis somatic embryos development. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 124,<br />
183-191.<br />
LINSMAIER E.M. & SKOOG F. 1965 Organic growth factor<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 18, 100-<br />
127.<br />
LIPAVSKA H. & VREUGDENHIL D. 1996 Uptake <strong>of</strong> mannitol<br />
from the media by in vitro grown plants. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ<br />
Cult.45, 103-107.<br />
LIPPMANN B. & LIPPMANN G. 1984 Induction <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryos in cotyledonary tissue <strong>of</strong> soybean, Glycine max L. Merr.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 3, 215-218.<br />
LITZ R.E. 1988 Somatic embryogenesis from cultured leaf<br />
explants <strong>of</strong> the tropical tree Euphoria longan Stend. J. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Physiol. 132, 190-193.<br />
LIU Y.K., SEKI M. & FURUSAKI S. 1999 <strong>Plant</strong> cell<br />
immobilization in lo<strong>of</strong>a sponge using two-way bubble circular<br />
system. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 32, 8-14.<br />
LLOYD D., ROBERTS A.V. & SHORT K.C. 1988 <strong>The</strong> induction<br />
in vitro <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots in Rosa. Euphytica 37, 31-36.<br />
LLOYD G. & McCOWN B. 1981 Commercially-feasible<br />
micropropagation <strong>of</strong> Mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use <strong>of</strong><br />
shoot tip culture. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. Proc. 30, 421-427.<br />
LLOYD G. & McCOWN B. 1981 Commercially-feasible<br />
micropropagation <strong>of</strong> Mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use <strong>of</strong><br />
shoot tip culture. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. Proc. 30, 421-427.<br />
LOEWUS F.A. & LOEWUS M.W. 1980 Myo-inositol:<br />
Biosynthesis and metabolism. pp. 43-76 in Stumpf and Conn<br />
(eds.): <strong>The</strong> Biochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong>s 3. Academic Press N.Y. 43-76.<br />
LOEWUS F.A. 1974 <strong>The</strong> biochemistry <strong>of</strong> myo-inositol in plants.<br />
Recent Adv. Phytochem. 8, 179-207.<br />
LOEWUS F.A., KELLY S. & NEUFELD E.F. 1962 Metabolism<br />
<strong>of</strong> myo-inositol in plants: Conversion to pectin hemicellulose, Dxylose<br />
and sugar acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 48, 421-425.<br />
LOU H. & KAKO S. 1995 Role <strong>of</strong> high sugar concentrations in<br />
inducing somatic embryogenesis from cucumber cotyledons. Sci.<br />
Hortic. 64, 11-20.<br />
LOVELL P.H., ILLSLEY A. & MOORE K.G. 1972 <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><br />
light intensity and sucrose on root formation, photosynthetic<br />
ability, and senescence in detached cotyledons <strong>of</strong> Sinapis alba L.<br />
and Raphanus sativus L. Ann. Bot. 36, 123-134.<br />
LU C., VASIL I.K. & OZIAS-AKINS P. 1982 Somatic embryogenesis<br />
in Zea mays. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet. 62, 109-112.<br />
LUMSDEN P.J., PRYCE S. & LEIFERT C. 1990 Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
mineral nutrition on the growth and multiplication <strong>of</strong> in vitro<br />
cultured plants. pp. 108-113 in Nijkamp et al. (eds.) 1990 (q.v.).<br />
MADHUSUDHAN R., RAS S.R. & RAVISHANKAR G.A. 1995<br />
Osmolarity as a measure <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> plant cells in suspension<br />
cultures. Enz. Microb. Tech. 17, 989-991.<br />
MAPES M.O. & ZAERR J.B. 1981 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> the female<br />
gametophyte on the growth <strong>of</strong> cultured Douglas fir embryos.<br />
Ann. Bot. 48, 577-582.<br />
MAHESHAWARI P. AND RANGASWAMY N.S. 1963 (eds.).<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> and Organ <strong>Culture</strong>. Int. Soc. <strong>Plant</strong> Morphologists,<br />
Univ. Delhi, India.<br />
MARETZKI A. & THOM, M. 1978 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> a galactose-adapted<br />
sugarcane cell line grown in suspension culture.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 61, 544-548.<br />
MARETZKI A., DELA-CRUZ A. & NICKELL L.G. 1971<br />
Extracellular hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> starch in sugarcane cell suspensions.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 48, 521-525.<br />
MARETZKI A., THOM A. & NICKELL L.G. 1972 Influence <strong>of</strong><br />
osmotic potentials on the growth and chemical composition <strong>of</strong><br />
sugarcane cell cultures. Hawaii <strong>Plant</strong> Res. 58, 183-199.<br />
MARETZKI A., THOM M. & NICKELL L.G. 1974 Utilisation<br />
and metabolism <strong>of</strong> carbohydrates in cell and callus cultures. pp.
166 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
329-361 in Street H.E. (ed.) <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> and <strong>Plant</strong> Science.<br />
Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco.<br />
MARGARA J. & RANCILLAC M. 1966 Observations<br />
préliminaires sur le rôle du milieu nutritif dans l’initiation florale<br />
des bourgeons né<strong>of</strong>ormés in vitro chez Cichorium intybus L.<br />
Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 263D, 1455-1458.<br />
MARSOLAIS A.A., WILSON D.P.M., TSUJITA M.J. &<br />
SENARATNA T. 1991 Somatic embryogenesis and artificial seed<br />
production in Zonal (Pelargonium horterum) and Regal<br />
(Pelargonium domesticum) geranium. Can. J. Bot. 69, 1188-1193.<br />
MARTIN S.M. & ROSE D. 1976 Growth <strong>of</strong> plant cell (Ipomoea)<br />
suspension cultures at controlled pH levels. Can. J. Bot. 54,<br />
1264-1270.<br />
MARUYAMA E., ISH<strong>II</strong> K. & KINOSHITA I. 1998 Alginate<br />
encapsulation technique and cryogenic procedures for long-term<br />
storage <strong>of</strong> the tropical forest tree Guazuma crinita Mart. in vitro<br />
cultures. Jarq-Jpn. Agr. Res. Q. 32, 301-309.<br />
MATHES M.C., MORSELLI M. & MARVIN J.W. 1973 Use <strong>of</strong><br />
various carbon sources by isolated maple callus cultures. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell Physiol. 14, 797-801.<br />
MAUSETH J.D. 1979 Cytokinin-elicited formation <strong>of</strong> the pith-rib<br />
meristem and other effects <strong>of</strong> growth regulators on the<br />
morphogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echino cereus (Cactaceae) seedling shoot<br />
apical meristems. Am. J. Bot. 66, 446-451.<br />
McCANCE R.A. & WIDDOWSON E.M. 1940 <strong>The</strong> Chemical<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong> Foods. British M.R.C. Spec. Rep. Serv. No. 235.<br />
MCGREGOR L.J. & MCHUGHEN A. 1990 <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong><br />
various cultural factors on anther culture <strong>of</strong> four cultivars <strong>of</strong> spring<br />
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Can. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 70, 183-192.<br />
MEHTA A.R. 1982 Comparative studies on some physiological<br />
aspects in organ forming (diploid as well as haploid) tobacco and<br />
non-organ forming cotton callus tissues. pp. 125-126 in Fujiwara<br />
A. (ed.) 1982 (q.v.).<br />
MELLOR F.C. & STACE-SMITH R. 1969 Development <strong>of</strong> excised<br />
potato buds in nutrient medium. Can. J. Bot. 47, 1617-1621.<br />
MENON M.K.C. & LAL M. 1972 Influence <strong>of</strong> sucrose on the<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> cells with zygote-like potentialities in a moss.<br />
Naturwissenschaften 59, 514.<br />
MERKLE S.A., PARROTT W.A. & FLINN B.S. 1995 Morphogenetic<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis. pp. 155-205 in Thorpe<br />
T.A. (ed.) In Vitro Embryogenesis in <strong>Plant</strong>s. Kluwer Acad. Publ.,<br />
Dordrecht.<br />
MERYL SMITH M. & STONE B.A. 1973 Studies on Lolium<br />
multiflorum endosperm in tissue culture. 1. Nutrition. Aust. J.<br />
Biol. Sci. 26, 123-133.<br />
MILLER C.O. 1961 A kinetin-like compound in maize. Proc. Natl.<br />
Acad. Sci. USA 47, 170-174.<br />
MILLER J.H. 1968 Fern gametophytes as experimental material.<br />
Bot. Rev. 34, 361-426.<br />
MINOCHA S.C. & HALPERIN W. 1974 Hormones and<br />
metabolites which control tracheid differentiation with or without<br />
concomitant effects on growth in cultured tuber tissue <strong>of</strong><br />
Helianthus tuberosus L. <strong>Plant</strong>a 116, 319-331.<br />
MITCHELL E.D., JOHNSON B.B. & WHITTLE T. 1980 βgalactosidase<br />
activity in cultured cotton cells (Gossypium<br />
hirsutum L.). A comparison between cells growing on sucrose<br />
and lactose. In Vitro 16, 907-912.<br />
MOLNAR S.J. 1988 Nutrient modifications for improved growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brassica nigra cell suspension cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 15, 257-267.<br />
MONDAL H., MANDAL R.K. & BISWAS B.B. 1972 RNA<br />
polymerase from eukaryotic cells. Isolation and purification <strong>of</strong><br />
enzymes and factors from chromatin <strong>of</strong> coconut nuclei. Eur. J.<br />
Biochem. 25, 463-470.<br />
MONNIER M. 1976 <strong>Culture</strong> in vitro de l’embryon immature de<br />
Capsella bursa-pastoris Moench (L.). Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. 39,<br />
1-120.<br />
MONNIER M. 1978 <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> zygotic embryos. pp. 277-286 in<br />
Thorpe T. A. (ed.) 1978 Frontiers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>. Int.<br />
Assoc. for <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>. Distrib. by <strong>The</strong> Bookstore,<br />
Univ. Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.<br />
MOREL G. & MULLER J.-F. 1964 In vitro culture <strong>of</strong> the apical<br />
meristem <strong>of</strong> the potato. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris 258,<br />
5250-5252.<br />
MOREL G. & WETMORE R.H. 1951 <strong>Tissue</strong> culture <strong>of</strong><br />
monocotyledons. Am. J. Bot. 38, 138-140.<br />
MOREL G. 1946 Action de l’acid pantothénique sur la croissance<br />
de tissus d’Aubépine cultivés in vitro. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.,<br />
Paris 223, 166-168.<br />
MORRIS D.A. 2000 Transmembrane auxin carrier systems –<br />
Dynamic regulators <strong>of</strong> polar auxin transport. <strong>Plant</strong> Growth Reg.<br />
32, 161-172.<br />
MÜLLER J.F., MISSIONIER C. & CABOCHE M. 1983 Low<br />
density growth <strong>of</strong> cells derived from Nicotiana and Petunia<br />
protoplasts: Influence <strong>of</strong> the source <strong>of</strong> protoplasts and<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> the growth- promoting activity <strong>of</strong> various auxins.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 57, 35-41.<br />
MURASHIGE T. & NAKANO R.T. 1968 <strong>The</strong> light requirement<br />
for shoot initiation in tobacco callus culture. Am. J. Bot. 55, 710.<br />
MURASHIGE T. & SKOOG F. 1962 A revised medium for rapid<br />
growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>. 15, 473-497.<br />
MURASHIGE T. & TUCKER D.P.H. 1969 Growth factor<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> citrus tissue culture. pp. 1155-1161 in Chapman<br />
H. D. (ed.) Proc. 1st Int. Citrus Symp. Vol. 3, Univ. Calif.,<br />
Riverside Publication.<br />
MURASHIGE T. & TUCKER D.P.H. 1969 Growth factor<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> citrus tissue culture. pp. 1155-1161 in Chapman<br />
H. D. (ed.) Proc. 1st Int. Citrus Symp. Vol. 3, Univ. Calif.,<br />
Riverside Publication.<br />
MURASHIGE T. 1974 <strong>Plant</strong> propagation through tissue cultures.<br />
Annu. Rev. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 25, 135-166.<br />
MURASHIGE T., SHABDE M.N., HASEGAWA P.N.,<br />
TAKATORI F.H. & JONES J.B. 1972 Propagation <strong>of</strong> asparagus<br />
through shoot apex culture. I. Nutrient media for formation <strong>of</strong><br />
plantlets. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97, 158-161.<br />
MURASHIGE T., SERPA M. & JONES J.B. 1974 Clonal<br />
multiplication <strong>of</strong> Gerbera through tissue culture. HortScience 9,<br />
175-180.<br />
MUTAFTSCHIEV S., COUSSON A. & TRAN THANH VAN K.<br />
1987 Modulation <strong>of</strong> cell growth and differentiation by pH and<br />
oligosaccharides. pp. 29-42 in Jackson M.B., Mantell S.H. &<br />
Blake J. (eds.) Advances in the Chemical Manipulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong><br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>s. Monograph 16, British <strong>Plant</strong> Growth Regulator<br />
Group, Bristol.<br />
NAIRN B.J. 1988 Significance <strong>of</strong> gelling agents in a production<br />
tissue culture laboratory. Comb. Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. 1987<br />
37, 200-205.<br />
NARAYANASWAMI S. & LARUE C.D. 1955 <strong>The</strong> morphogenic<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> various physical factors on the gemmae <strong>of</strong> Lunaria.<br />
Phytomorph. 5, 99-109.<br />
NEAL C.A. & TOPOLESKI L.D. 1983 Effects <strong>of</strong> the basal<br />
medium on growth <strong>of</strong> immature tomato embryos in vitro. J. Am.<br />
Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108, 434-438.<br />
NEGASH A., KRENS F., SCHAART J. & VISSER B. 2001 In<br />
vitro conservation <strong>of</strong> enset under slow-growth conditions. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 66, 107-111.<br />
NERNST W. 1904 <strong>The</strong>orie der Reaktiongeschwindigkeit in heterogenen<br />
Systemen. Phys. Chem. 47, 52-55.
NESIUS K.K. & FLETCHER J.S. 1973 Carbon dioxide and pH<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> non-photosynthetic tissue culture cells. Physiol.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>. 28, 259-263.<br />
NICHOL J.W., SLADE D., VISS P. & STUARD D.A. 1991 Effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic acid pretreatment on the regeneration and<br />
development (conversion) <strong>of</strong> whole plants from callus cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 79, 181-192.<br />
NICHOL J.W., SLADE D., VISS P. & STUART D.A. 1991<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> organic acid pretreatment on the regeneration and<br />
development (conversion) <strong>of</strong> whole plants from callus cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 79, 181-192.<br />
NICKELL L.G. & BURKHOLDER P.R. 1950 Atypical growth <strong>of</strong><br />
plants. <strong>II</strong>. Growth in vitro <strong>of</strong> virus tumors <strong>of</strong> Rumex in relation to<br />
temperature, pH and various sources <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, carbon and<br />
sulfur. Am. J. Bot. 37, 538-547.<br />
NICKELL L.G. & BURKHOLDER P.R. 1950 Atypical growth <strong>of</strong><br />
plants. <strong>II</strong>. Growth in vitro <strong>of</strong> virus tumors <strong>of</strong> Rumex in relation to<br />
temperature, pH and various sources <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, carbon and<br />
sulfur. Am. J. Bot. 37, 538-547.<br />
NICKELL L.G. & MARETZKI A. 1969 Growth <strong>of</strong> suspension<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> sugarcane cells in chemically defined media. Physiol.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>. 22, 117-125.<br />
NICKELL L.G. & MARETZKI A. 1970 <strong>The</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> sugars<br />
and starch as carbon sources by sugarcane cell suspension<br />
cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Physiol. 11, 183-185.<br />
NIJKAMP H.I.J., VAN DER PLAS I.H.W. & VAN AARTRIJK J.<br />
(eds.) Progress in <strong>Plant</strong> Cellular and Molecular Biology. Proc.<br />
V<strong>II</strong>th Int. Cong. on <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> and Cell <strong>Culture</strong>. Amsterdam,<br />
<strong>The</strong> Netherlands. 24-29 June 1990. Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />
Dortrecht, Netherlands.<br />
NITSCH J.P. & NITSCH C. 1956 Auxin-dependent growth <strong>of</strong><br />
excised Helianthus tissues. Am. J. Bot. 43, 839-851.<br />
NITSCH J.P. & NITSCH C. 1965 Né<strong>of</strong>ormation de fleurs in vitro<br />
chez une espèce de jours courts: Plumbaga indica L. Ann. Phys.<br />
Vég. 7, 251-256.<br />
NITZSCHE W. & WENZEL G. 1977 Haploids in <strong>Plant</strong> Breeding.<br />
Suppl. 8 to Z. Pflanzenzucht. Parey. Berlin and Hamburg.<br />
NOH E.W., MINOCHA S.C. & RIEMENSCHNEIDER D.E. 1988<br />
Adventitious shoot formation from embryonic explants <strong>of</strong> red<br />
pine (Pinus resinosa). Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 74, 119-124.<br />
NORGAARD J.V. 1997 Somatic embryo maturation and plant regeneration<br />
in Abies nordmanniana LK. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 124, 211-221.<br />
NORSTOG K. & SMITH J. 1963 <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> small barley embryos<br />
on defined media. Science 142, 1655-1656.<br />
NORSTOG K. & SMITH J. 1963 <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> small barley embryos<br />
on defined media. Science 142, 1655-1656.<br />
NORSTOG K. 1965b Induction <strong>of</strong> apogamy in megagametophytes<br />
<strong>of</strong> Zamia integrifolia. Am. J. Bot. 52, 993-999.<br />
NORSTOG K. 1973 New synthetic medium for the culture <strong>of</strong><br />
premature barley embryos. In Vitro 8, 307-308.<br />
OBATA-SASAMOTO H. & THORPE T.A. 1983 Cell wall<br />
invertase activity in cultured tobacco tissues. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 2, 3-9.<br />
OBATA-SASAMOTO H., BEAUDOIN-EAGAN L. & THORPE<br />
T.A. 1984 C-metabolism during callus induction in tobacco.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 3, 291-299.<br />
OJIMA K. & OHIRA K. 1980 <strong>The</strong> exudation and characterization<br />
<strong>of</strong> iron-solubilizing compounds in a rice cell suspension culture.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Physiol. 21, 1151-1161.<br />
OKA S. & OHYAMA K. 1982 Sugar utilization in mulberry<br />
(Morus alba L.) bud culture. pp. 67-68 in Fujiwara A. (ed.) 1982<br />
(q.v.).<br />
OWEN H.R., WENGERD D. & MILLER A.R. 1991 <strong>Culture</strong><br />
medium pH influenced by basal medium, carbohydrate source,<br />
gelling agent, activated charcoal, and medium storage method.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 10, 583-586.<br />
Chapter 4 167<br />
OWENS L.D. & WOZNIAK C.A. 1991 Measurement and effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> gel matric potential and expressibility on production <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenic callus by cultured sugarbeet leaf discs. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
<strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 26, 127-133.<br />
PAMPLIN E.J. & CHAPMAN J.M. 1975 Sucrose suppression <strong>of</strong><br />
chlorophyll synthesis in tissue cultures. J. Exp. Bot. 26, 212-220.<br />
PARFITT D.E., ALMEHDI A.A. & BLOKSBERG L.N. 1988 Use<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic buffers in plant tissue-culture systems. Sci. Hortic. 36,<br />
157-163.<br />
PARIS D. & DUHAMET L. 1953 Action d’un mélange d’acides<br />
aminés et vitamines sur la proliferation des cultures de croun-gall<br />
de Scorsonère; comparison avec l’action du lait de coco. Compt.<br />
Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 236, 1690-1692.<br />
PARR D.R. & EDELMAN J. 1975 Release <strong>of</strong> hydrolytic<br />
enzymes from the cell walls <strong>of</strong> intact and disrupted carrot callus<br />
tissue. <strong>Plant</strong>a 127, 111-119.<br />
PASQUA G., MANES F., MONACELLI B., NATALE L. &<br />
ANSELMI S. 2002 Effects <strong>of</strong> the culture medium pH and ion<br />
uptake in in vitro vegetative organogenesis in thin cell layers <strong>of</strong><br />
tobacco. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 162, 947-955.<br />
PASQUALETTO P.-L., WERGIN W.P. & ZIMMERMAN R.H.<br />
1988 Changes in structure and elemental composition <strong>of</strong> vitrified<br />
leaves <strong>of</strong> `Gala’ apple in vitro. Acta Hortic. 227, 352-357.<br />
PASQUALETTO P.-L., ZIMMERMAN R.H. & FORDHAM I.<br />
1986a Gelling agent and growth regulator effects on shoot<br />
vitrification <strong>of</strong> `Gala’ apple in vitro. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111,<br />
976-980 & 112, 407.<br />
PASQUALETTO P.-L., ZIMMERMAN R.H. & FORDHAM I.<br />
1988b <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> cation and gelling agent concentrations<br />
on vitrification <strong>of</strong> apple cultivars in vitro. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 14, 31-40.<br />
PATEL K.R. & BERLYN G.P. 1983 Cytochemical investigations<br />
on multiple bud formation in tissue cultures <strong>of</strong> Pinus coulteri.<br />
Can. J. Bot. 61, 575-585.<br />
PECH J.C. & ROMANI R.J. 1979 Senescence <strong>of</strong> pear fruit cells<br />
cultured in a continuously renewed auxin-deprived medium.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 64, 814-817.<br />
PHILLIPS D.V. & SMITH A.E. 1974 Soluble carbohydrates in<br />
soybean. Can. J. Bot. 52, 2447-2452.<br />
PHILLIPS G.C. & COLLINS G.B. 1979 In vitro tissue culture <strong>of</strong><br />
selected legumes and plant regeneration from callus cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
red clover. Crop Sci. 19, 59-64.<br />
PHILLIPS G.C. & COLLINS G.B. 1984 Chapter 7 – Red Clover<br />
and other forage legumes. pp. 169-210 in Sharp W.R., Evans<br />
D.A., Ammirato P.V. & Yamada Y. (eds.) Handbook <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Culture</strong>. Vol. 2. Crop Species. Macmillan Publishing Co.,<br />
New York, London.<br />
PHILLIPS G.C. & HUBSTENBERGER J.F. 1985 Organogenesis in<br />
pepper tissue cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 4, 261-269.<br />
PICCIONI E. & STANDARDI A. 1995 Encapsulation <strong>of</strong> micropropagated<br />
buds <strong>of</strong> six woody species. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ<br />
Cult. 42, 221-226.<br />
PICCIONI E. 1997 <strong>Plant</strong>lets from encapsulated micropropagated<br />
buds <strong>of</strong> M.26 apple rootstock. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 47,<br />
255-260.<br />
PIERIK R.L.M. 1988 In vitro culture <strong>of</strong> higher plants as a tool in<br />
the propagation <strong>of</strong> horticultural crops. Acta Hortic. 226, 25-40.<br />
PIERIK R.L.M., SPRENKELS P.A., VAN DER HARST B. &<br />
VAN DER MEYS Q.G. 1988 Seed germination and further<br />
development <strong>of</strong> plantlets <strong>of</strong> Paphiopedilum ciliolare Pfitz. in<br />
vitro. Sci. Hortic. 34, 139-153.<br />
PLIEGO-ALFARO F. 1988 Development <strong>of</strong> an in-vitro rooting<br />
bioassay using juvenile-stage stem cuttings <strong>of</strong> Persea americana<br />
Mill. J. Hort. Sci. 63,295-301.
168 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
POLIKARPOCHKINA R.T., GAMBURG K.Z. & KHAVIN E.E.<br />
1979 Cell-suspension culture <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.). Z.<br />
Pflanzenphysiol. 95, 57-67.<br />
POLLARD J.K., SHANTZ E.M. & STEWARD F.C. 1961<br />
Hexitols in coconut milk: their role in the nurture <strong>of</strong> dividing<br />
cells. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 36, 492-501.<br />
PREECE J.E. & SUTTER E.G. 1991 Acclimatization <strong>of</strong> micropropagated<br />
plants to the greenhouse and field. pp. 71-93 in<br />
Debergh P.C. and Zimmerman R.H. (eds.) Micropropagation.<br />
Technology and Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />
Dordrecht, Boston, London. ISBN 0-7923-0818-2.<br />
PREIL W. 1991 Application <strong>of</strong> bioreactors in plant propagation.<br />
pp. 425-445 in Debergh P.C. and Zimmerman R.H. (eds.) Micropropagation.<br />
Technology and Application. Kluwer Academic<br />
Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London. ISBN 0-7923-0818-2.<br />
PRETOVA A. & WILLIAMS E.G. 1986 Direct somatic<br />
embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> flax (Linum<br />
usitatissimum L.). J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 126, 155-161.<br />
PUA E.C. & CHONG C. 1984 Requirement for sorbitol (Dglucitol)<br />
as carbon source for in vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Malus<br />
robusta No. 5. Can. J.Bot. 62, 1545-1549.<br />
PUA E.-C., RAGOLSKY E., CHANDLER S.F. & THORPE T.A.<br />
1985a Effect <strong>of</strong> sodium sulfate on in vitro organogenesis <strong>of</strong><br />
tobacco callus. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 5, 55-62.<br />
PUA E.-C., RAGOLSKY E. & THORPE T.A. 1985b Retention <strong>of</strong><br />
shoot regeneration capacity <strong>of</strong> tobacco callus by Na2SO4. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell Rep. 4, 225-228.<br />
RABE E. 1990 Stress physiology: the functional significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen-containing compounds. J. Hortic. Sci.<br />
65, 231-243<br />
RADLEY M. & DEAR E. 1958 Occurrence <strong>of</strong> gibberellin-like<br />
substances in coconut. Nature 182, 1098.<br />
RAGHAVAN V. 1977 Diets and culture media for plant embryos.<br />
pp. 361-413 in Recheigl M. Jr. (ed.) 1977 CRC Handbook Series<br />
in Nutrition & Food Vol. 4. CRC Press, Baton Rouge, Florida.<br />
RAHMAN M.A. & BLAKE J. 1988 <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> medium<br />
composition and culture conditions on in vitro rooting and ex<br />
vitro establishment <strong>of</strong> jackfruit (Artocarpas heterophyllus Lam.).<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 13, 189-200.<br />
RAINS D.W. 1989 <strong>Plant</strong> tissue and protoplast culture: application<br />
to stress physiology and biochemistry. In: Jones H.G., Flowers<br />
T.J. & Jones M.B. (eds) <strong>Plant</strong>s under stress. Cambridge<br />
University Press, London, pp 181-196.<br />
RAINS D.W., VALENTINE R.C. & HOLLAENDER A. (eds.)<br />
1980 Genetic Engineering <strong>of</strong> Osmoregulation. Plenum Press,<br />
New York, London.<br />
RAMAGE C.M. & WILLIAMS R.R. 2002 Inorganic nitrogen<br />
requirements during shoot organogenesis in tobacco leaf discs. J.<br />
Exp. Bot 53, 1437-1443.<br />
RAMMING D.W. 1990 <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> embryo culture in fruit<br />
breeding. HortScience 25, 393-398.<br />
RANGA SWAMY N.S. 1963 Studies on culturing seeds <strong>of</strong><br />
Orobanche aegyptiaca. pp. 345-354 in Maheshwari and Ranga<br />
Swamy (eds.) 1963 (q.v.).<br />
RANGAN T.S. 1984 Clonal propagation. pp. 68-73 in Vasil I.K.<br />
(ed.) Cell <strong>Culture</strong> and Somatic Cell Genetics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong>s Vol. 1.<br />
Acad. Press, New York.<br />
RANGAN T.S. 1974 Morphogenic investigations on tissue<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Panicum miliaceum. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 72, 456-459.<br />
RANGAN T.S., MURASHIGE T. & BITTERS W.P. 1968 In<br />
vitro initiation <strong>of</strong> nucellar embryos in monoembryonic Citrus.<br />
HortScience 3, 226-227.<br />
RAQUIN C. 1983 Utilization <strong>of</strong> different sugars as carbon sources<br />
for in vitro anther culture <strong>of</strong> petunia. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 111,<br />
Suppl., 453-457.<br />
RAVEN J.A. & SMITH F.A. 1976 Cytoplasmic pH regulation and<br />
electrogenic H + extrusion. Curr. Adv. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 8, 649-660.<br />
RAVEN J.A. 1986 Biochemical disposal <strong>of</strong> excess H + in growing<br />
plants? New Phytol. 104, 175-206.<br />
RAWAL S.K. & MEHTA A.R. 1982 Changes in enzyme activity<br />
and isoperoxidases in haploid tobacco callus during<br />
organogenesis. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 24, 67-77.<br />
REDENBAUGH K., VISS P., SLADE D. & FUJ<strong>II</strong> J.A. 1987<br />
Scale-up: artificial seeds. pp. 473-493 in Green C.E, Sommers<br />
D.A., Hackett W.P. and Biesboer D.D. (eds.) <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> and<br />
Cell <strong>Culture</strong>. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York<br />
REIDIBOYM-TALLEUX L., DIEMER F., SOURDIOUX M.,<br />
CHAPELAIN K. & DE-MARCH G.G. 1999 Improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
somatic embryogenesis in wild cherry (Prunus avium), effect <strong>of</strong><br />
maltose and ABA supplements. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult.<br />
55, 199-209.<br />
REPUNTE V.P., TAYA M. & TONE S. 1995 Preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
artificial seeds using cell aggregates from horseradish hairy roots<br />
encapsulated in alginate gel with paraffin coat. J. Ferment.<br />
Bioeng. 79, 83-86.<br />
RIER J.P. & BESLOW D.T. 1967 Sucrose concentration and the<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> xylem in callus. Bot. Gaz. 128, 73-77.<br />
RIER J.P. & CHEN P.K. 1964 Pigment induction in plant tissue<br />
cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 39, Suppl.<br />
RIERA M., VALON C., FENZI F., GIRAUDAT J. & LEUNG J.<br />
2005 <strong>The</strong> genetics <strong>of</strong> adaptive responses to drought stress:<br />
abscisic acid-dependent and abscisic acid-independent signalling<br />
components. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 123, 111-119.<br />
ROBBINS W.J. & BARTLEY M.A. 1937 Vitamin B, and the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> excised tomato roots. Science 85, 246-247.<br />
ROBBINS W.J. & SCHMIDT M.B. 1939a Vitamin B6, a growth<br />
substance for isolated tomato roots. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash.<br />
25, 1-3.<br />
ROBBINS W.J. & SCHMIDT M.B. 1939b Further experiments on<br />
excised tomato roots. Am. J. Bot. 26, 149-159.<br />
ROBBINS W.J. 1922 Cultivation <strong>of</strong> excised root tips and stem tips<br />
under sterile conditions. Bot. Gaz. 73, 376-390.<br />
ROBERTS A.V. & SMITH E.F. 1990 <strong>The</strong> preparation in vitro <strong>of</strong><br />
chrysanthemum for transplantation to soil. (1). Protection <strong>of</strong> roots<br />
by cellulose plugs. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 21, 129-32.<br />
ROBERTS D.R., SUTTON B.C.S. & FLINN B.S. 1990<br />
Synchronous and high frequency germination <strong>of</strong> interior spruce<br />
somatic embryos following partial drying at high relative<br />
humidity. Can. J. Bot. 68, 1086-1090.<br />
ROBERTS-OEHLSCHLAGER, S.L. & DUNWELL J.M. 1990<br />
Barley anther culture – pretreatment on mannitol stimulates<br />
production <strong>of</strong> microspore-derived embryos. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 20, 235-240.<br />
RODRIGUEZ G. & LORENZO MARTIN J.R. 1987 In vitro<br />
propagation <strong>of</strong> Canary Island banana (Musa acuminata Colla<br />
AAA var. Dwarf Cavendish). Studies <strong>of</strong> factors affecting culture<br />
obtention, preservation and conformity <strong>of</strong> the plants. Acta Hortic.<br />
212, 577-583.<br />
ROEST S. & BOKELMANN G.S. 1975 Vegetative propagation <strong>of</strong><br />
Chrysanthemum morifolium Ram. in vitro. Sci. Hortic. 3, 317-330.<br />
ROMBERGER J.A. & TABOR C.A. 1971 <strong>The</strong> Picea abies shoot<br />
apical meristem in culture. I. Agar and autoclaving effects. Am.<br />
J. Bot. 58, 131-140.<br />
ROSE D. & MARTIN S.M. 1975 Effect <strong>of</strong> ammonium on growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant cells (Ipomoea sp.) in suspension cultures. Can. J. Bot.<br />
53, 1942-1949.<br />
ROSNER A., GRESSEL J. & JAKOB K.M. 1977 Discoordination<br />
<strong>of</strong> ribosomal RNA metabolism during metabolic shifts <strong>of</strong><br />
Spirodela plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 474, 386-397.<br />
RUBERY P.H. 1980 <strong>The</strong> mechanism <strong>of</strong> transmembrane auxin<br />
transport and its relation to the chemiosmotic hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the
polar transport <strong>of</strong> auxin. pp. 50-60 in Skoog F. (ed.) 1980 <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Growth Substances. Proc. 10 th Int. Cong. <strong>Plant</strong> Growth<br />
Substances, Madison, Wisconsin 1979. Springer Verlag, Berlin,<br />
Heidelberg.<br />
RUGINI E., TARINI P. & ROSSODIVITA M.E. 1987 Control <strong>of</strong><br />
shoot vitrification <strong>of</strong> almond and olive grown in vitro. Acta<br />
Hortic. 212, 177-183.<br />
RUSSELL J.A. & McCOWN B.H. 1986 <strong>Culture</strong> and regeneration<br />
<strong>of</strong> Populus leaf protoplasts isolated from non-seedling tissue.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 46, 133-142.<br />
SAALBACH G. & KOBLITZ H. 1978 Attempts to initiate callus<br />
formation from barley leaves. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 13, 165-169.<br />
SACHAR R.C. & IYER R.D. 1959 Effect <strong>of</strong> auxin, kinetin and<br />
gibberellin on the placental tissue <strong>of</strong> Opuntia dillenii Haw.<br />
cultured in vitro. Phytomorph. 9, 1-3.<br />
SADASIVAN V. 1951 <strong>The</strong> phosphatases in coconut (Cocos<br />
nucifera). Arch. Biochem. 30, 159-164.<br />
SAGARE A.P., LEE Y.L., LIN T.C., CHEN C.C. & TSAY H.S.<br />
2000 Cytokinin-induced somatic embryogenesis and plant<br />
regeneration in Corydalis yanhusuo (Fumariaceae) -a medicinal<br />
plant. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 160,139-147.<br />
SAGAWA Y. & KUNISAKI J.T. 1982 Clonal propagation <strong>of</strong><br />
orchids by tissue culture. pp. 683-684 in Fujiwara A. (ed.) 1982<br />
(q.v.).<br />
SAVAGE A.D., KING J. & GAMBORG O.L. 1979 Recovery <strong>of</strong> a<br />
pantothenate auxotroph from a cell suspension culture <strong>of</strong> Datura<br />
innoxia Mill. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 16, 367-376.<br />
SCHENK R.U. & HILDEBRANDT A.C. 1972 Medium and<br />
techniques for induction and growth <strong>of</strong> monocotyledonous and<br />
dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can. J. Bot. 50, 199-204.<br />
SCHERER P.A. 1988 Standardization <strong>of</strong> plant micropropagation<br />
by usage <strong>of</strong> a liquid medium with polyurethane foam plugs or a<br />
solidified medium with the gellan gum gelrite instead <strong>of</strong> agar.<br />
Acta Hortic. 226, 107-114.<br />
SCHERER P.A., MULLER E., LIPPERT H. & WOLFF G. 1988<br />
Multielement analysis <strong>of</strong> agar and gelrite impurities investigated<br />
by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry as well as<br />
physical properties <strong>of</strong> tissue culture media prepared with agar or<br />
gellan gum gelrite. Acta Hortic. 226, 655-658.<br />
SCHOLTEN H.J. & PIERIK R.L.M. 1998 Agar as a gelling agent:<br />
differential biological effects in vitro. Sci. Hortic. 77, 109-116.<br />
SCHUBERT S. & MATZKE H. 1985 Influence <strong>of</strong> phytohormones<br />
and other effectors on proton extrusion by isolated protoplasts<br />
from rape leaves. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 64, 285-289.<br />
SCHULLER A. & REUTHER G. 1993 Response <strong>of</strong> Abies alba<br />
embryonal-suspensor mass to various carbohydrate treatments.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 12, 199-202.<br />
SCOTT J. & BREEN P. 1988 Sugar uptake by strawberry fruit<br />
discs and protoplasts. HortScience 23, 756.<br />
SEARS R.G. & DECKARD E.L. 1982 <strong>Tissue</strong> culture variability<br />
in wheat: callus induction and plant regeneration. Crop Sci. 22,<br />
546-550.<br />
SENARATNA T., MCKERSEE B.D. & BOWLEY S.R. 1989a<br />
Desiccation tolerance <strong>of</strong> alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) somatic<br />
embryos. Influence <strong>of</strong> abscisic acid, stress pretreatments and<br />
drying rates. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 65, 253-259.<br />
SENARATNA T., McKERSIE B. & ECCLESTONE S. 1989b<br />
Germination <strong>of</strong> desiccated somatic embryos <strong>of</strong> alfalfa (Medicago<br />
sativa L.). <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 89, Suppl., 135.<br />
SERP D., CANTANA E., HEINZEN C., VON STOCKAR U. &<br />
MARISON I.W. 2000 Characterization <strong>of</strong> an encapsulation<br />
device for the production <strong>of</strong> monodisperse alginate beads for cell<br />
immobilization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 70, 41-53.<br />
SERRES R.A. 1988 Effects <strong>of</strong> sucrose and basal medium<br />
concentration on in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> American chestnut.<br />
HortScience 23, 739.<br />
Chapter 4 169<br />
SHANTZ E.M. & STEWARD F.C. 1952 Coconut milk factor: the<br />
growth-promoting substances in coconut milk. J. Am. Chem.<br />
Soc. 74, 6133.<br />
SHANTZ E.M. & STEWARD F.C. 1955 <strong>The</strong> identification <strong>of</strong><br />
compound A from coconut milk as 1,3-diphenylurea. J. Am.<br />
Chem. Soc. 77, 6351-6353.<br />
SHANTZ E.M. & STEWARD F.C. 1956 <strong>The</strong> general nature <strong>of</strong><br />
some nitrogen free growth-promoting substances from Aesculus<br />
and Cocos. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 30, Suppl., XXXV.<br />
SHANTZ E.M. & STEWARD F.C. 1964 Growth-promoting<br />
substances from the environment <strong>of</strong> the embryo. <strong>II</strong>. <strong>The</strong> growthstimulating<br />
complexes <strong>of</strong> coconut milk, corn and Aesculus. pp.<br />
59-75 in Actes du Coll. Int. C.N.R.S. No. 123.<br />
SHARMA A.K., PRASAD R.N. & CHATURVEDI H.C. 1981<br />
Clonal propagation <strong>of</strong> Bougainvillea glabra `Magnifica’ through<br />
shoot apex culture. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 1, 33-38.<br />
SHEAT D.E.G., FLETCHER B.H. & STREET H.E. 1959 Studies<br />
on the growth <strong>of</strong> excised roots. V<strong>II</strong>I. <strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> excised<br />
tomato roots supplied with various inorganic sources <strong>of</strong> nitrogen.<br />
New Phytol. 58, 128-141.<br />
SHEPARD J.F. & TOTTEN R.E. 1977 Mesophyll cell protoplasts<br />
<strong>of</strong> potato: isolation, proliferation and plant regeneration. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Physiol. 60, 313-316.<br />
SHILLITO R.D., PASZKOWSKI J. & POTRYKUS I. 1983<br />
Agarose plating and a bead type culture technique enable and<br />
stimulate development <strong>of</strong> protoplast-derived colonies in a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant species. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 2, 244-247.<br />
SHININGER T.L. 1979 <strong>The</strong> control <strong>of</strong> vascular development.<br />
Annu. Rev. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 30, 313-337.<br />
SHOLTO-DOUGLAS J. 1976 Advanced Guide to Hydroponics.<br />
Pelham Books, London. ISBN 0-7207-08303.<br />
SHORT K.C., WARBURTON J. & ROBERT A.V. 1987 In vitro<br />
hardening <strong>of</strong> cultured cauliflower and chrysanthemum plantlets<br />
to humidity. Acta Hortic. 212, 329-334.<br />
SHVETSOV S.G. & GAMBURG K.Z. 1981 Uptake <strong>of</strong> 2,4-D by<br />
corn cells in a suspension culture. Dokl. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R.<br />
257, 765-768.<br />
SIEVERT R.C. & HILDEBRANDT A.C. 1965 Variations within<br />
single cell clones <strong>of</strong> tobacco tissue cultures. Am. J. Bot. 52,<br />
742-750.<br />
SINGHA S. 1982 Influence <strong>of</strong> agar concentration on in vitro shoot<br />
proliferation <strong>of</strong> Malus sp. `Almey’ and Pyrus communis `Seckel’.<br />
J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107, 657-660.<br />
SKINNER J.C. & STREET H.E. 1954 Studies on the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
excised roots. <strong>II</strong>. Observations on the growth <strong>of</strong> excised<br />
groundsel roots. New Phytol. 53, 44-67.<br />
SKIRVIN R.M. 1981 Fruit crops. pp. 51-139 in Conger B.V. (ed.)<br />
Cloning Agricultural <strong>Plant</strong>s via In Vitro Techniques. CRC Press,<br />
Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.<br />
SKIRVIN R.M. & CHU M.C 1979 In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong><br />
‘Forever Yours’ rose (Rosa hybrida) HortScience 14, 608-610.<br />
SKIRVIN R.M., CHU M.C., MANN M.L., YOUNG H.,<br />
SULLIVAN J. & FERMANIAN T. 1986 Stability <strong>of</strong> tissue<br />
culture medium pH as a function <strong>of</strong> autoclaving, time, and<br />
cultured plant material. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 5, 292-294.<br />
SMITH C.W. 1967 A study <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> excised embryo shoot<br />
apices <strong>of</strong> wheat in vitro. Ann. Bot. 31, 593-605.<br />
SMITH D.L. & KRIKORIAN A.D. 1989 Release <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenic potential from excised zygotic embryos <strong>of</strong> carrot<br />
and maintenance <strong>of</strong> polyembryonic cultures in hormone-free<br />
medium. Am. J. Bot. 76, 1832-1843.<br />
SMITH D.L. & KRIKORIAN A.D. 1990a Somatic proembryo<br />
production from excised wounded zygotic carrot embryos on<br />
hormone-free medium; evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> pH, ethylene<br />
and activated charcoal. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 9, 34-37.
170 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
SMITH D.L. & KRIKORIAN A.D. 1990b pH control <strong>of</strong> carrot<br />
somatic embryogenesis. pp. 449-453 in Nijkamp et al. (eds.)<br />
1990 (q.v.).<br />
SMITH E.F., ROBERTS A.V. & MOTTLEY J. 1990a <strong>The</strong><br />
preparation in vitro <strong>of</strong> chrysanthemum for transplantation to soil.<br />
(2) Improved resistance to desiccation conferred by<br />
paclobutrazol. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult., 21, 133-40.<br />
SMITH E.F., ROBERTS A.V. & MOTTLEY J. 1990b <strong>The</strong><br />
preparation in vitro <strong>of</strong> chrysanthemum for transplantation to soil.<br />
(3) Improved resistance to desiccation conferred by reduced<br />
humidity. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. , 21, 141-5.<br />
SMITH F.A. & RAVEN J.A. 1979 Intercellular pH and its<br />
regulation. Annu. Rev. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 30, 289-311.<br />
SMITH M.M. & STONE B.A. 1973 Studies on Lolium multiflorum<br />
endosperm in tissue culture. I. Nutrition. Aust. J. Biol. 26, 123-133.<br />
SOCZEK U. & HEMPEL M. 1988 <strong>The</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> some organic<br />
medium compounds on multiplication <strong>of</strong> gerbera in vitro. Acta<br />
Hortic. 226, 643-646.<br />
SOPORY S.K., JACOBSEN E. & WENZEL G. 1978 Production<br />
<strong>of</strong> monohaploid embryoids and plantlets in cultured anthers <strong>of</strong><br />
Solanum tuberosum. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. Lett. 12, 47-54.<br />
SORVARI S. 1986a <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> starch gelatinized nutrient media<br />
in barley anther cultures. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 25, 127-133.<br />
SORVARI S. 1986b Differentiation <strong>of</strong> potato discs in barley starch<br />
gelatinized nutrient media. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 25, 135-138.<br />
SORVARI S. 1986c Comparison <strong>of</strong> anther cultures <strong>of</strong> barley<br />
cultivars in barley-starch and agar gelatinized media. Ann. Agric.<br />
Fenn. 25, 249-254.<br />
SPANGENBERG G., KOOP H.-U., LICHTER R. & SCHWEI-<br />
GER H.G. 1986 Microculture <strong>of</strong> single protoplasts <strong>of</strong> Brassica<br />
napus. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 66, 1-8.<br />
STAFFORD A. & DAVIES D.R. 1979 <strong>The</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> immature<br />
pea embryos. Ann. Bot. 44, 315-321.<br />
STASOLLA C. & YEUNG E.C. 1999 Ascorbic acid improves<br />
conversion <strong>of</strong> white spruce somatic embryos. In Vitro Cell.<br />
Dev.-Pl. 35, 316-319.<br />
STASOLLA C., KONG L., YEUNG E.C. & THORPE T.A. 2003<br />
Maturation <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos in conifers: morphogenesis,<br />
physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. In Vitro Cell.<br />
Dev. – Pl. 38, 93-105.<br />
STAUDT G. 1984 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> myo-inositol on the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
callus tissue in Vitis. J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 116, 161-166.<br />
STEFFEN J.D., SACHS R.M. & HACKETT W.P. 1988 Growth<br />
and development <strong>of</strong> reproductive and vegetative tissues <strong>of</strong><br />
Bougainvillea cultured in vitro as a function <strong>of</strong> carbohydrate.<br />
Am. J. Bot. 75, 1219-1224.<br />
STEHSEL M.L. & CAPLIN S.M. 1969 Sugars: autoclaving versus<br />
sterile filtration and the growth <strong>of</strong> carrot root tissue. Life Sci. 8,<br />
1255-1259.<br />
STEINER S. & LESTER R.L. 1972 Studies on the diversity <strong>of</strong><br />
inositol-containing yeast phospholipids: incorporation <strong>of</strong> 2deoxyglucose<br />
into lipid. J. Bacteriol. 109, 81-88.<br />
STEINER S., SMITH S., WAECHTER C.J. & LESTER R.L. 1969<br />
Isolation and partial characterization <strong>of</strong> a major inositolcontaining<br />
yeast phospholipid in baker’s yeast, mannosyldiinositol,<br />
diphosphorylceramide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64,<br />
1042-1048.<br />
STEINITZ B. (1999) Sugar alcohols display nonosmotic roles in<br />
regulating morphogenesis and metabolism in plants that do not<br />
produce polyols as primary photosynthetic products. J. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Physiol. 155, 1-8.<br />
STEWARD F.C. & CAPLIN S.M. 1951 A tissue culture from<br />
potato tuber: the synergistic action <strong>of</strong> 2,4-D and <strong>of</strong> coconut milk.<br />
Science 113, 518-520.<br />
STEWARD F.C. & CAPLIN S.M. 1952 Investigations on growth<br />
and metabolism <strong>of</strong> plant cells. IV. Evidence on the role <strong>of</strong> the<br />
coconut milk factor. Ann. Bot. 16, 491-504.<br />
STEWARD F.C. & MOHAN RAM H.Y. 1961 Determining<br />
factors in cell growth: some implications for morphogenesis in<br />
plants. Adv. Morph. 1, 189-265.<br />
STEWARD F.C. & RAO K.V.N. 1970 Investigations on the growth<br />
and metabolism <strong>of</strong> cultured explants <strong>of</strong> Daucus carota. <strong>II</strong>I. <strong>The</strong><br />
range <strong>of</strong> responses induced in carrot explants by exogenous growth<br />
factors and by trace elements. <strong>Plant</strong>a 91, 129-145.<br />
STEWARD F.C. & SHANTZ E.M. 1956 <strong>The</strong> chemical induction<br />
<strong>of</strong> growth in plant tissue cultures. pp. 165-186 in Wain and<br />
Wightman (eds.) 1956 <strong>The</strong> Chemistry and Mode <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Growth Substances. Butterworth Scientific Publications<br />
Ltd., London.<br />
STEWARD F.C. & SHANTZ E.M. 1959 <strong>The</strong> chemical regulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> growth: Some substances and extracts which induce growth<br />
and morphogenesis. Annu. Rev. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 10, 379-404.<br />
STEWARD F.C. 1963 Carrots and coconuts: Some investigations<br />
on growth. pp. 178-197 in Maheshwari and Ranga Swamy (eds.)<br />
1963 (q.v.).<br />
STEWARD F.C., CAPLIN S.M. & MILLAR F.K. 1952<br />
Investigations on growth and metabolism <strong>of</strong> plant cells. I. New<br />
techniques for the investigation <strong>of</strong> metabolism, nutrition, and<br />
growth in undifferentiated cells. Ann. Bot. 16, 57-77.<br />
STEWARD F.C., MAPES M.O. & AMMIRATO P.V. 1969<br />
Growth and morphogenesis in tissue and free cell cultures. pp.<br />
329-376 in Steward F.C. (ed.) 1969 <strong>Plant</strong> Physiology - A Treatise<br />
Vol. VB. Academic Press, New York, London.<br />
STEWARD F.C., MAPES M.O., KENT A.E. & HOLSTEN R.D.<br />
1964 Growth and development <strong>of</strong> cultured plant cells. Science<br />
143, 20-27.<br />
STEWARD F.C., SHANTZ E.M., POLLARD J.K., MAPES M.O.<br />
& MITRA J. 1961 Growth induction in explanted cells and<br />
tissues: Metabolic and morphogenetic manifestations. pp. 193-<br />
246 in Rudnick D. (ed.) Synthesis <strong>of</strong> Molecular and Cellular<br />
Structure. Ronald Press, New York.<br />
STONE O.M. 1963 Factors affecting the growth <strong>of</strong> carnation<br />
plants from shoot apices. Ann. Appl. Biol. 52, 199-209.<br />
STRAUS J. & LA RUE C.D. 1954 Maize endosperm tissue grown<br />
in vitro. 1. <strong>Culture</strong> requirements. Am. J. Bot. 41, 687-694.<br />
STREET H.E. & HENSHAW G.G. 1966 Introduction and methods<br />
employed in plant tissue culture. pp. 459-532 in Willmer E.N.<br />
Cells and <strong>Tissue</strong>s in <strong>Culture</strong> – Methods and Physiology. Vol 3.<br />
Academic Press, London, New York].<br />
STREET H.E. & McGREGOR S.M. 1952 <strong>The</strong> carbohydrate<br />
nutrition <strong>of</strong> tomato roots. <strong>II</strong>I. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> external sucrose<br />
concentration on the growth and anatomy <strong>of</strong> excised roots. Ann.<br />
Bot. 16, 185-205.<br />
STREET H.E. 1969 Growth in organised and unorganised systems<br />
- knowledge gained by culture <strong>of</strong> organs and tissue explants. pp.<br />
3-224 in Steward F. C. (ed.) 1969. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiology - a Treatise.<br />
5B. Academic Press, New York.<br />
STREET H.E. 1977 Laboratory organization. pp. 11-30 in Street<br />
H.E. (ed.) <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> and Cell <strong>Culture</strong>. Bot. Monographs<br />
Vol.11, Blackwell Scientific Public-ations. Oxford, London.<br />
STREET H.E., McGONAGLE M.P. & LOWE J.S. 1951<br />
Observations on the `staling’ <strong>of</strong> White’s medium by excised<br />
tomato roots. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 4, 592-616.<br />
STREET H.E., McGONAGLE M.P. & McGREGOR S.M. 1952<br />
Observations on the ‘staling’ <strong>of</strong> White’s medium by excised<br />
tomato roots. <strong>II</strong>. Iron availability. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 5, 248-276.<br />
STRICKLAND S.G., NICHOL J.W., McCALL C.M. & STUART<br />
D.A. 1987 Effect <strong>of</strong> carbohydrate source on alfalfa<br />
embryogenesis. <strong>Plant</strong> Sci. 48, 113-121.
STUART D.A., STRICKLAND S.G. & NICHOL J.W. 1986<br />
Enhanced somatic embryogenesis using maltose. U.S. Patent No.<br />
4801545 ,<br />
STUART D.A., STRICKLAND S.G. & WALKER K.A. 1987<br />
Bioreactor production <strong>of</strong> alfalfa somatic embryos. HortScience<br />
22, 800-803.<br />
SUNDERLAND N. & DUNWELL J.M. 1977 Anther and pollen<br />
culture. pp. 223-265 in Street H.E. (ed.) <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> and Cell<br />
<strong>Culture</strong>. Bot. Monographs Vol.11, Blackwell Scientific Publications.<br />
Oxford, London.<br />
SUTTLE J.C. & HULTSTRAND J.F. 1994 Role <strong>of</strong> endogenous<br />
abscisic acid in potato microtuber dormancy. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 105,<br />
891-896.<br />
SWEDLUND B. & LOCY R.D. 1988 Somatic embryogenesis and<br />
plant regeneration in two-year old cultures <strong>of</strong> Zea diploperennis.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 7, 144-147.<br />
TABER R.P., ZHANG C. & HU W.S. 1998 Kinetics <strong>of</strong> Douglasfir<br />
(Pseudotsuga menziesii) somatic embryo development. Can.<br />
J. Bot. 76, 863-871.<br />
TAKAYAMA S. & MISAWA M. 1979 Differentiation in Lilium<br />
bulb scales grown in vitro - effect <strong>of</strong> various cultural conditions.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 46, 184-190.<br />
TAKAYAMA S. & MISAWA M. 1979 Differentiation in Lilium<br />
bulb scales grown in vitro - effect <strong>of</strong> various cultural conditions.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 46, 184-190.<br />
TANAKA M., HIRANO T., GOI M., HIGASHIURA T.,<br />
SASAHARA H. & MURASAKI K. 1991 Practical application <strong>of</strong><br />
a novel disposable film culture vessel in micropropagation. Acta<br />
Hortic. 300, 77-84.<br />
TANDEAU DE MARSAC N. & PEAUD-LENOEL C. 1972a<br />
<strong>Culture</strong>s photosynthtique de lignes clonales de cellules de tabac.<br />
Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 274D, 1800-1802.<br />
TANDEAU DE MARSAC N. & PEAUD-LENOEL C. 1972b<br />
Exchanges d’oxygène et assimilation de gaz carbonique de tissus<br />
de tabac en culture photosynthétique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.<br />
Paris 274D, 2310-2313.<br />
TAUTORUS T.E. & DUNSTAN D.I. 1995 Scale-up <strong>of</strong> embryonic<br />
plant suspension cultures in bioreactors. In: S Jain, P Gupta, and<br />
R Newton (Eds) Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants Vol. 1.<br />
Kluwer Academic Publishers, <strong>The</strong> Netherlands pp 265-292.<br />
TEISSON C. & ALVARD D. 1999 In vitro production <strong>of</strong> potato<br />
microtubers in liquid medium using temporary immersion. Potato<br />
Res. 42, 499-504.<br />
TELLE J. & GAUTHERET R.J. 1947 Sur la culture indéfinie des<br />
tissus de la racine de jusquiame (Hyascyamus niger). Compt.<br />
Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 224, 1653-1654.<br />
TENG W.L. 1997 Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Anthurium adventitious shoots<br />
using liquid or raft culture. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 49,<br />
153-156.<br />
THOM M., MARETZKI A., KOMOR E. & SAKAI W.S. 1981<br />
Nutrient uptake and accumulation by sugarcane cell cultures in<br />
relation to the growth cycle. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 1, 3-14.<br />
THOMPSON M.R. & THORPE T.A. 1981 Mannitol metabolism<br />
in cell cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 67, Suppl., 27.<br />
THOMPSON M.R., DOUGLAS T.J., OBATA-SASAMOTO H. &<br />
THORPE T.A. 1986 Mannitol metabolism in cultured plant<br />
cells. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 67, 365-369.<br />
THORPE T.A & MEIER D.D. 1973 Sucrose metabolism during<br />
tobacco callus growth. Phytochemistry 12, 493-497.<br />
THORPE T.A. 1982 Carbohydrate utilization and metabolism.<br />
pp. 325-368 in Bonga J.M. & Durzan D.J. (eds.) <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong><br />
in Forestry. Martinus Nijh<strong>of</strong>f/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, <strong>The</strong><br />
Hague.<br />
THORPE T.A. & LAISHLEY E.J. 1974 Carbohydrate oxidation<br />
during Nicotiana tabacum callus growth. Phytochemistry 13,<br />
1323-1328.<br />
Chapter 4 171<br />
THORPE T.A. & LAISHLEY E.J. 1973 Glucose oxidation<br />
during shoot initiation in tobacco callus cultures. J. Exp. Bot.<br />
24, 1082-1089.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MEIER D.D. 1972 Starch metabolism, repiration<br />
and shoot formation in tobacco callus cultures. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 27,<br />
365-369.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MEIER D.D. 1973 Effects <strong>of</strong> gibberellic acid<br />
and abscisic acid on shoot formation in tobacco callus cultures.<br />
Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 29, 121-124.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MEIER D.D. 1974 Starch metabolism in shootforming<br />
tobacco callus. J. Exp. Bot. 25, 288-294.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MEIER D.D. 1975 Effect <strong>of</strong> gibberellic acid on<br />
starch metabolism in tobacco callus cultured under shoot-forming<br />
conditions. Phytomorph. 25, 238-245.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MURASHIGE T. 1968a Some histochemical<br />
changes underlying shoot initiation in tobacco callus culture. Am.<br />
J. Bot. 55, 710.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MURASHIGE T. 1968b Starch accumulation in<br />
shoot-forming tobacco callus cultures. Science 160, 421-422.<br />
THORPE T.A. & MURASHIGE T. 1970 Some histochemical<br />
changes underlying shoot initiation in tobacco callus cultures.<br />
Can. J. Bot. 48, 277-285.<br />
THORPE T.A. 1982 Physiological and biochemical aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
organogenesis in vitro. pp. 121-124 in Fujiwara A. (ed.) 1982<br />
(q.v.).<br />
THORPE T.A., JOY R.W. IV & LEUNG W.M. 1986 Starch turnover<br />
in shoot-forming tobacco callus. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 66, 58-62.<br />
TIAN H.Q. & RUSSELL S.D. 1998 <strong>Culture</strong>-induced changes in<br />
osmolality <strong>of</strong> tobacco cell suspensions using four exogenous<br />
sugars. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 55, 9-13<br />
TIBURCIO A.F., GENDY C.A. & TRAN THANH VAN K. 1989<br />
Morphogenesis in tobacco subepidermal cells: putrescine as a<br />
marker <strong>of</strong> root differentiation. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 19,<br />
43-54.<br />
TIMBERT R., BARBOTIN J.-N., KERSULEC A., BAZINET C.<br />
& THOMAS D. 1995 Physico-chemical properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
encapsulation matrix and germination <strong>of</strong> carrot somatic embryos.<br />
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 46, 573-578.<br />
TOMAR U.K. & GUPTA S.C. 1988 Somatic embryogenesis and<br />
organogenesis in callus cultures <strong>of</strong> a tree legume - Albizia<br />
richardiana King. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 7, 70-73.<br />
TOR M., TWYFORD C.T., FUNES I., BOCCON-GIBOD J.,<br />
AINSWORTH C.C. & MANTELL S.H. 1998 Isolation and<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> protoplasts from immature leaves and embryogenic<br />
cell suspensions <strong>of</strong> Dioscorea yams: tools for transient gene<br />
expression studies. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 53, 113-125.<br />
TORRES K. & CARLISI J.A. 1986 Shoot and root organogenesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Camellia sasanqua. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 5, 381-384.<br />
TORREY J.G. 1956 Chemical factors limiting lateral root<br />
formation in isolated pea roots. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 9, 370-388<br />
TRAN THANH VAN K. & TRINH H. 1978 <strong>Plant</strong> propagation:<br />
non-identical and identical copies. pp. 134-158 in Hughes K.W.,<br />
Henke R. & Constantin M. (eds.) Propagation <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Plant</strong>s<br />
through <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>. Technical Inf. Center, U.S. Dept.<br />
Energy. Spingfield, Va. CONF-7804111.<br />
TRELEASE S.F. & TRELEASE H.M. 1933 Physiologically<br />
balanced culture solutions with stable hydrogen-ion concentration.<br />
Science 78, 438-439.<br />
TREMBLAY F.M. & LALONDE M. 1984 Requirements for in<br />
vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> seven nitrogen-fixing Alnus species. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 3, 189-199.<br />
TREMBLAY F.M., NESME X. & LALONDE M. 1984 Selection<br />
and micropropagation <strong>of</strong> nodulating and non-nodulating clones <strong>of</strong><br />
Alnus crispa (Ait.) Pursh. <strong>Plant</strong> Soil 78, 171-179.<br />
TRINDADE H. & PAIS M.S. 1997 In vitro studies on Eucalyptus<br />
globulus rooting ability. In Vitro Cell. Dev.-Pl. 33, 1-5.
172 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
TROLINDER N.L. & GOODIN J.R. 1987 Somatic embryogenesis<br />
and plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell Rep. 6, 231-234.<br />
TULECKE W., WEINSTEIN L.H., RUTNER A. &<br />
LAURENCOT H.J. 1961 <strong>The</strong> biochemical composition <strong>of</strong><br />
coconut water as related to its use in plant tissue culture. Contrib.<br />
Boyce Thomps. 21, 115-128.<br />
TURNER S.R. & SINGHA S. 1990 Vitrification <strong>of</strong> crabapple, pear<br />
and geum on gellan gum-solidified culture medium. HortScience<br />
25, 1648-1650.<br />
UMBECK P., JOHNSON G., BARTON K. & SWAIN W. 1987<br />
Genetically transformed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants.<br />
Nat. Biotechnol. 5, 263-266.<br />
VACIN E.F. & WENT F.W. 1949 Some pH changes in nutrient<br />
solutions. Bot. Gaz. 110, 605-613.<br />
VAIN P., MCMULLEN M.D. & FINER J.J. 1993 Osmotic<br />
treatment enhances particle bombardment-mediated transient and<br />
stable transformation <strong>of</strong> maize. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 12, 84-88.<br />
VAN DER KRIEKEN W.M., BRETELER H., VISSER M.H.M. &<br />
JORDI W. 1992 Effect <strong>of</strong> light and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin on indolebutyric<br />
acid-induced root formation on apply in vitro. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 85,<br />
589-594.<br />
VAN HUYSTEE R.B. 1977 Porphyrin metabolism in peanut cells<br />
cultured in sucrose containing medium. Acta Hortic. 78, 83-87.<br />
VAN OVERBEEK J. 1942 Water uptake by excised root systems <strong>of</strong><br />
the tomato due to non-osmotic forces. Am. J. Bot. 29, 677-683.<br />
VAN OVERBEEK J., CONKLIN M.E. & BLAKESLEE A.F. 1941<br />
Factors in coconut milk essential for growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />
very young Datura embryos. Science 94, 350-351.<br />
VAN OVERBEEK J., CONKLIN M.E. & BLAKESLEE A.F.<br />
1942 Cultivation in vitro <strong>of</strong> small Datura embryos. Am. J. Bot.<br />
29, 472-477.<br />
VAN OVERBEEK J., SIU R. & HAAGEN-SMIT A.J. 1944<br />
Factors affecting the growth <strong>of</strong> Datura embryos in vitro. Am. J.<br />
Bot. 31, 219-224.<br />
VAN STADEN J. & DREWES S.E. 1975 Identification <strong>of</strong> zeatin<br />
and zeatin riboside in coconut milk. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 34, 106-109.<br />
VAN STADEN J. 1976 <strong>The</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> zeatin glucoside from<br />
coconut milk. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 36, 123-126.<br />
VANDENBELT J.M. 1945 Nutritive value <strong>of</strong> coconut. Nature 156,<br />
174-175.<br />
VANSVEREN-VAN ESPEN N. 1973 Effets du saccharose sur le<br />
contenu en chlorophylles de protocormes de Cymbidium Sw.<br />
(Orchidaceae) cultivés in vitro. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 106,<br />
107-115.<br />
VASIL I.K. & HILDEBRANDT A.C. 1966a Variations <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenetic behaviour in plant tissue cultures. I. Cichorium<br />
endivia. Am. J. Bot. 53, 860-869.<br />
VASIL I.K. & HILDEBRANDT A.C. 1966b Variations <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenetic behaviour in plant tissue cultures. <strong>II</strong>.<br />
Petroselinum hortense. Am. J. Bot. 53, 869-874.<br />
VASIL I.K. & HILDEBRANDT A.C. 1966c Growth and<br />
chlorophyll production in plant callus tissues grown in vitro.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong>a 68, 69-82.<br />
VASIL V. & VASIL I.K. 1981a Somatic embryogenesis and plant<br />
regeneration from tissue cultures <strong>of</strong> Pennisetum americanum, and<br />
P. americanum x P. purpureum hybrid. Am. J. Bot. 68, 864-872.<br />
VASIL V. & VASIL I.K. 1981b Somatic embryogenesis and plant<br />
regeneration from suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> pearl millet<br />
(Pennisetum americanum). Ann. Bot. 47, 669-678.<br />
VENVERLOO C. 1976 <strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious organs. <strong>II</strong>I.<br />
A comparison <strong>of</strong> root and shoot formation on Nautilocalyx<br />
explants. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 80, 310-322.<br />
VERMA D.C. & DOUGALL D.K. 1977 Influence <strong>of</strong> carbohydrates<br />
on quantitative aspects <strong>of</strong> growth and embryo formation in wild<br />
carrot suspension cultures. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 53, 81-85.<br />
VERMA D.C. & DOUGALL D.K. 1979 Biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> myo-<br />
inositol and its role as a precursor <strong>of</strong> cell-wall polysaccharides in<br />
suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> wild-carrot cells. <strong>Plant</strong>a 146, 55-62.<br />
VERMA D.P.S. & VAN HUYSTEE R.B. 1971 Derivation,<br />
characteristics and large scale culture <strong>of</strong> a cell line from Arachis<br />
hypogaea L. cotyledons. Exp. Cell Res. 69, 402-408.<br />
VISEUR J. 1987 Micropropagation <strong>of</strong> pear, Pyrus communis L., in<br />
a double-phase culture medium. Acta Hortic. 212, 117-124.<br />
VON ARNOLD S. 1987 Effect <strong>of</strong> sucrose on starch accumulation<br />
in, and adventitous bud formation on, embryos <strong>of</strong> Picea abies.<br />
Ann. Bot. 59, 15-22.<br />
VREUGDENHIL D., BOOGAARD Y., VISSER, R.G.F. & DE<br />
BRUIJN S.M. 1998 Comparison <strong>of</strong> tuber and shoot formation<br />
from in vitro cultured potato explants. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Tiss Organ Cult.<br />
53, 197-204.<br />
VYSKOT B. & BEZDEK M. 1984 Stabilization <strong>of</strong> synthetic media<br />
for plant tissue culture and cell cultures. Biol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 26, 132-143.<br />
VYSKOT B. & JARA Z. 1984 Clonal propagation <strong>of</strong> cacti through<br />
axillary buds in vitro. J. Hortic. Sci. 59, 449-452.<br />
WALKER D.R. & PARROTT W.A. 2001 Effect <strong>of</strong> polyethylene<br />
glycol and sugar alcohols on soybean somatic embryo<br />
germination and conversion. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 64,<br />
55-62.<br />
WATAD A.A., AHRONI A., ZUKER A., SHEJTMAN H.,<br />
NISSIM A. & VAINSTEIN A. 1996 Adventitious shoot formation<br />
from carnation stem segments: A comparison <strong>of</strong> different<br />
culture procedures. Sci. Hortic. 65, 313-320<br />
WANN S.R., VEAZEY R. L., KAPHAMMER J. 1997 Activated<br />
charcoal does not catalyze sucrose hydrolysis in tissue culture<br />
media during autoclaving. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 50,<br />
221-224.<br />
WATAD A.A., KOCHBA M., NISSIM A. & GABA V. 1995<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> Aconitum napellus micropropagation by liquid<br />
culture on floating membrane rafts. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 14, 345-348.<br />
WATANABE K., TANAKA K., ASADA K. & KASAL Z. 1971<br />
<strong>The</strong> growth promoting effect <strong>of</strong> phytic acid on callus tissues <strong>of</strong><br />
rice seed. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Physiol. 12, 161-164.<br />
WEI Z.M., KYO M. & HARADA H. 1986 Callus formation and<br />
plant-regeneration through direct culture <strong>of</strong> isolated pollen <strong>of</strong><br />
Hordeum vulgare cv. Sabarlis. <strong>The</strong>or. Appl. Genet.72, 252-255.<br />
WELANDER T. 1977 In vitro organogensis in explants from<br />
different cultivars <strong>of</strong> Begonia hiemalis. Physiol. <strong>Plant</strong>. 41,<br />
142-145.<br />
WESTON G.D. & STREET H.E. 1968 Sugar absorption and sucrose<br />
inversion by excised tomato roots. Ann. Bot. 32, 521-529.<br />
WETHERELL D.F. 1969 Phytochrome in cultured wild carrot<br />
tissue. I. Synthesis. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 44, 1734-1737.<br />
WETHERELL D.F. 1984 Enhanced adventive embryogenesis<br />
resulting from plasmolysis <strong>of</strong> cultured wild carrot cells. <strong>Plant</strong><br />
Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 3, 221-227.<br />
WETMORE R.H. & RIER J.P. 1963 Experimental induction <strong>of</strong><br />
vascular tissues in callus <strong>of</strong> angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 50, 418-430.<br />
WHITE M.C., DECKER A.M. & CHANEY R.L. 1981 Metal<br />
complexation in xylem fluid. I. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
and soybean stem exudate. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 67, 292-300.<br />
WHITE P.R. 1932 Influence <strong>of</strong> some environmental conditions on<br />
the growth <strong>of</strong> excised root-tips <strong>of</strong> wheat seedlings in liquid<br />
media. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 7, 613-628.<br />
WHITE P.R. 1934 Potentially unlimited growth <strong>of</strong> excised tomato<br />
root tips in a liquid medium. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 9, 585-600.<br />
WHITE P.R. 1937 Survival <strong>of</strong> isolated tomato roots at sub-optimal<br />
and supra-optimal temperatures. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 12, 771-776.<br />
WHITE P.R. 1943a A Handbook <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong>. <strong>The</strong><br />
Jacques Catlell Press, Lancaster, Pa.
WHITE P.R. 1943b Nutrient deficiency studies and an improved<br />
inorganic nutrient for cultivation <strong>of</strong> excised tomato roots. Growth<br />
7, 53-65.<br />
WHITE P.R. 1954 <strong>The</strong> Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Animal and <strong>Plant</strong> Cells. 1st.<br />
edition. Ronald Press, New York.<br />
WHITE P.R. 1963 <strong>The</strong> Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Animal and <strong>Plant</strong> Cells. 2nd<br />
edition. Ronald Press, New York.<br />
WHITTIER D.P. & STEEVES T.A. 1960 <strong>The</strong> induction <strong>of</strong><br />
apogamy in the bracken fern. Can. J. Bot. 38, 925-930.<br />
WILLIAMS R.R., TAJI A.A. & BOLTON J.A. 1984 In vitro<br />
propagation <strong>of</strong> Dampiera diversifolia and Prostanthera<br />
rotundifolia. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 3, 273-281.<br />
WILLIAMS R.R., TAJI A.M. & BOLTON J.A. 1985 Specificity<br />
and interaction among auxins, light and pH in rooting <strong>of</strong><br />
Australian woody species in vitro. HortScience 20, 1052-1053.<br />
WILSON K.S. & CUTTER V.M. 1955 Localization <strong>of</strong> acid<br />
phosphatase in the embryo sac and endosperm <strong>of</strong> Cocos nucifera.<br />
Am. J. Bot. 42, 116-119.<br />
WOLF S., KALMAN-ROTEM N., YAKIR D. & ZIV M. 1998<br />
Autotrophic and heterotrophic carbon assimilation <strong>of</strong> in vitro<br />
grown potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) J. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 135,<br />
574-580.<br />
WOLTER K.E. & SKOOG F. 1966 Nutritional requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
Fraxinus callus cultures. Am. J. Bot. 53, 263-269.<br />
WOOD H.N. & BRAUN A.C. 1961 Studies on the regulation <strong>of</strong><br />
certain essential biosynthetic systems in normal and crown-gall<br />
tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 47, 1907-1913.<br />
WOODWARD S., THOMSON R.J. & NEALE W. 1991<br />
Observations on the propagation <strong>of</strong> carnivorous plants by in vitro<br />
culture. Newsl. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. Spring 1991.<br />
WRIGHT K. & NORTHCOTE D.H. 1972 Induced root differentiation<br />
in sycamore callus. J. Cell Sci. 11, 319-337.<br />
WRIGHT M.S., KOEHLER S.M., HINCHEE M.A. & CARNES<br />
M.G. 1986 <strong>Plant</strong> regeneration by organogenesis in Glycine max.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 5, 150-154.<br />
XIE J., GAO M., CAI Q., CHENG X., SHEN Y. & LIANG Z..<br />
1995 Improved isolated microspore culture efficiency in medium<br />
with maltose and optimized growth regulator combination in<br />
japonica rice (Oryza sativa). <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 42,<br />
245-250.<br />
XU X., VAN LAMMEREN A.A.M., VERMEER E. &<br />
VREUGDENHIL D. 1998 <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> gibberellin, abscisic acid,<br />
and sucrose in the regulation <strong>of</strong> potato tuber formation in vitro.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 117, 575-584.<br />
YATAZAWA M., FURUHASHI K. & SHIMIZU M. 1967<br />
Growth <strong>of</strong> callus tissue from rice root in vitro. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell<br />
Physiol. 8, 363-373.<br />
Chapter 4 173<br />
YOSHIDA F., KOBAYASHI T. & YOSHIDA T. 1973 <strong>The</strong><br />
mineral nutrition <strong>of</strong> cultured chlorophyllous cells <strong>of</strong> tobacco. I.<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> p salts, p sucrose, Ca, Cl and B in the medium on the<br />
yield, friability, chlorophyll contents and mineral absorption <strong>of</strong><br />
cells. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Physiol. 14, 329-339.<br />
YOUNG R.E., HALE A., CAMPER N.D., KEESE R.J. &<br />
ADELBERG J.W. 1991 Approaching mechanization <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
micropropagation. Trans. ASAE 34, 328-333<br />
YU S.X. & DORAN P.M. 1994 Oxygen requirements and masstransfer<br />
in hairy-root culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44, 880-887.<br />
ZAGHMOUT O. & TORRES K.C. 1985 <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> various<br />
carbohydrate sources and concentrations on the growth <strong>of</strong> Lilium<br />
longiflorum ‘Harson’ grown in vitro. HortScience 20, 660.<br />
ZAMSKI E. & WYSE R.E. 1985 Stereospecificity <strong>of</strong> glucose<br />
carrier in sugar beet suspension cells. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiol. 78, 291-295.<br />
ZAPATA F.J, KHUSH G.S., CRILL J.P., NEU M.R., ROMERO<br />
R.O., TORRIZO L.R. & ALEJAR M. 1983 Rice anther culture at<br />
IRRI. pp. 27-86 in Cell and <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> Techniques for Cereal<br />
Crop Improvement. Science Press Beijing, China. Gordon and<br />
Breach Science Publications, Inc., New York.<br />
ZATYKO J.M. & MOLNAR I. 1986 Adventitious root formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> different fruit species influenced by the pH <strong>of</strong> medium. p. 29<br />
in Abstracts VI Intl. Cong. <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> & Cell <strong>Culture</strong>.<br />
Minneapolis, Minn.<br />
ZHANG B., STOLTZ L.P. & SNYDER J.C. 1986 In vitro<br />
proliferation and in vivo establishment <strong>of</strong> Euphorbia fulgens.<br />
HortScience 21, 859.<br />
ZHOU T.S. 1995 In vitro culture <strong>of</strong> Doritaenopsis: comparison<br />
between formation <strong>of</strong> the hyperhydric protocorm-like-body<br />
(PLB) and the normal PLB. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell Rep. 15, 181-185.<br />
ZHU J.K. (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in<br />
plants. Annu. Rev. <strong>Plant</strong> Biol. 53, 247-273.<br />
ZIMMERMAN R.H. 1979 <strong>The</strong> laboratory <strong>of</strong> micropropagation at<br />
Cesena, Italy. Comb. Proc. Int. <strong>Plant</strong> Prop. Soc. 29, 398-400.<br />
ZIV M, 1991. Quality <strong>of</strong> micropropagated plants - vitrification. In<br />
Vitro Cell. Dev. – Pl. 27, 64-69.<br />
ZIV, M. 1989. Enhanced shoot and cormlet proliferation in liquid<br />
cultured gladiolus buds by growth retardants. <strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong><br />
Organ Cult. 17, 101-110.<br />
ZIV M. 2005 Simple bioreactors for mass propagation <strong>of</strong> plants.<br />
<strong>Plant</strong> Cell <strong>Tissue</strong> Organ Cult. 81, 277-285<br />
ZWAR J.A. & BRUCE M.I. 1970 Cytokinins from apple extract<br />
and coconut milk. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23, 289-297.<br />
ZWAR J.A., KEFFORD N.P., BOTTOMLEY W. & BRUCE M.I.<br />
1963 A comparison <strong>of</strong> plant cell division inducers from coconut<br />
milk and apple fruitlets. Nature 200, 679-680.