26.11.2014 Views

Using Native Plant Species in Forest Restoration ... - Rainforestation

Using Native Plant Species in Forest Restoration ... - Rainforestation

Using Native Plant Species in Forest Restoration ... - Rainforestation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Us<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Native</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Species</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> and<br />

Slope Rehabilitation <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Dr. Billy C.H. Hau<br />

School of Biological Sciences, HKU<br />

chhau@hku.hk<br />

MAINSTREAMING NATIVE SPECIES‐BASED FOREST RESTORATION<br />

University of the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es‐Diliman<br />

Quezon City, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />

July 15–16, 2010


~ 7 million people <strong>in</strong> 1,100 km 2 but…


- Inhibit only 25 % of the land area<br />

- 75 % of the land is hilly<br />

- 40 % of the land is Country Park<br />

(all on government land)


Geography<br />

Tropic of Cancer<br />

Hong<br />

Kong


The Hong Kong Climate Diagram<br />

1961-1990 averages: 23 °C / 2,214.3 mm<br />

70<br />

140<br />

60<br />

120 300<br />

Temperature (degree C)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>fall (mm)<br />

10<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Month<br />

0<br />

Season:<br />

Dry<br />

Wet<br />

Dry


Past vegetation of Hong Kong<br />

Bischofia javanica


Deforestation <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong – completed 500-800 yrs ago!<br />

Wu Kau Tang<br />

Tai Mo Shan


The last major territory-wide deforestation <strong>in</strong> HK<br />

happened <strong>in</strong> the second World War<br />

Hong Kong 1946 – 1967 (Stoke, 2005)


Afforestation <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong - History<br />

Over 200 years of environmental forestry history<br />

- Soil erosion and hill fire control<br />

- Watershed forest for dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water<br />

- <strong>Forest</strong>ry is never important


Reforestation on road-side slopes <strong>in</strong><br />

countryside areas<br />

Acacia<br />

confusa


Reforestation <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong<br />

– exotic species<br />

Lophostemon confertus<br />

Acacia confusa<br />

Melaleuca qu<strong>in</strong>quenervia<br />

Eucalyptus sp.


Monoculture of Lophostemon confertus


Current natural vegetation of Hong Kong<br />

Degraded hillside<br />

grassland<br />

Shrubland<br />

Secondary forest<br />

Shrubland/forest transition


The vegetation cover of Hong Kong <strong>in</strong> the 90s<br />

Vegetation cover<br />

Area<br />

(km 2 )<br />

Shrublands 396 37<br />

Grasslands 177 16.5<br />

Secondary forest 86 8<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>ation 62 5.8<br />

(Dudgeon & Corlett 1994)<br />

% of the total land<br />

area<br />

Public demand on us<strong>in</strong>g native species for<br />

biodiversity conservation was on the rise!!!


Only a few native species were<br />

occasionally used by the<br />

government s<strong>in</strong>ce after the<br />

Second World War<br />

Castanopsis fissa<br />

Liquidambar<br />

formosana<br />

Schima superba<br />

Machilus breviflora


Government’s excuses then:<br />

• <strong>Native</strong> tree species often failed to establish on<br />

exposed sites;<br />

• Even if they survived, they grew slowly;<br />

• Lack of seedl<strong>in</strong>g supply of native trees;<br />

• Even if seedl<strong>in</strong>gs are available, they are<br />

expensive.<br />

‣ Many EIA plant<strong>in</strong>g projects <strong>in</strong> the 90s specified<br />

the use of native species but had to revert back<br />

to exotic species because of the lack of<br />

commercial supply of native tree seedl<strong>in</strong>gs


Yet, Hong Kong is rich <strong>in</strong> tree species<br />

390 native species <strong>in</strong> 67 families and 192<br />

genera (Fagaceae, Lauraceae)<br />

Up to the 1990s…<br />

Little is known about the 390 native tree<br />

species <strong>in</strong> HK:<br />

• Flower<strong>in</strong>g and fruit<strong>in</strong>g phenology<br />

• Silvicultural <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth conditions <strong>in</strong> nursery<br />

and <strong>in</strong> the wild


S<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1990s…<br />

<strong>Us<strong>in</strong>g</strong> native tree species for forest restoration <strong>in</strong> HK<br />

Government<br />

Academics<br />

Environmental<br />

NGOs<br />

Slow or reluctant<br />

to act<br />

• Field surveys<br />

• Field experiments<br />

• Public campaign<br />

• Set up a native tree<br />

nursery<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ue to use<br />

exotic tree species<br />

<strong>in</strong> reforestation<br />

• Natural succession<br />

• <strong>Forest</strong> restoration<br />

barriers<br />

• <strong>Restoration</strong> methods<br />

• Promote native<br />

species<br />

• <strong>Native</strong> species<br />

silviculture


Research<br />

Natural forest succession <strong>in</strong><br />

Hong Kong<br />

Grassland<br />

10 yrs<br />

Shrubland<br />

30-40 yrs<br />

Secondary<br />

forest<br />

(Chau 1994; Zhuang & Corlett, 1997)


Source: Yip, 2002<br />

Research: Natural barriers to forest regeneration <strong>in</strong> HK<br />

Tai Mo Shan (957 m)


Tai Mo Shan


Natural<br />

barriers to<br />

forest<br />

regeneration<br />

<strong>in</strong> HK<br />

Modified from<br />

Nepstad et al. 1990<br />

Degraded<br />

hillside<br />

Nutrient<br />

Drought<br />

_<br />

Fores<br />

t<br />

Dispersal<br />

+ _<br />

Mature<br />

Germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Trees<br />

_<br />

Sprout<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Grazers<br />

_ Non-trophic animal<br />

Growth<br />

damage<br />

_ _<br />

Attractants?<br />

Seed Pool Relict seeds<br />

Fruit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

_ Predators<br />

Shade<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Pool<br />

Relict roots


Natural barriers – seed dispersal<br />

Au, Corlett & Hau 2006<br />

• Compared seed<br />

dispersed <strong>in</strong>to<br />

grassland, shrubland<br />

and forest of Tai Mo<br />

Shan for 2 years<br />

• Results: seed <strong>in</strong>put<br />

<strong>in</strong>to grassland was<br />

surpris<strong>in</strong>gly high<br />

• Qualitative difference<br />

between habitats


Natural barriers – seed dispersal<br />

Au, Corlett & Hau 2006<br />

• Birds especially bulbuls are the major seed dispersers<br />

• 85% of the taxa and >99% of the seeds trapped<br />

• Estimated displacement is > 1 km <strong>in</strong> dry season (Weir &<br />

Corlett 2006)<br />

Red-whiskered Bulbul<br />

Pycnonotus jocosus<br />

Light-vented Bulbul<br />

Pycnonotus s<strong>in</strong>ensis


Natural barriers – seed dispersal<br />

Summary:<br />

1.Only a sub-set of the local tree flora is<br />

dispersed naturally on the degraded<br />

hillside<br />

2.The seed ra<strong>in</strong> is adequate for the<br />

development of woody vegetation cover<br />

3.Birds especially the bulbuls are the major<br />

seed dispersers


Natural barriers – seed predation<br />

Hau, 1997; Chung 2006<br />

• Compared both grassland & shrubland sites<br />

• Rodents are the major seed predators (Niviventer<br />

fulvescens; Rattus sikkimensis)<br />

• High temporal and spatial variations<br />

• Predation rate could reach 100% <strong>in</strong> 2 weeks<br />

• Predation rate <strong>in</strong> grassland is much lower than<br />

that <strong>in</strong> shrubland<br />

Seed predation is patchy <strong>in</strong> space & time. It is also a<br />

selective barrier on forest regeneration but will not<br />

significantly reduce the availability of woody seeds<br />

for forest succession.


Natural barriers – seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Chick, 2005<br />

• Tested the germ<strong>in</strong>ation of 23 common native<br />

tree species on Tai Mo Shan grassland<br />

• Most species can germ<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

• At least 6 species have germ<strong>in</strong>ation rates<br />

higher than 60% and larger than 50% of the<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ated seedl<strong>in</strong>gs survived after a year.<br />

Adverse conditions <strong>in</strong> the field for germ<strong>in</strong>ation such<br />

as drought; lack of shade aga<strong>in</strong> act as selective<br />

barriers only.


Natural barriers – seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth &<br />

survival<br />

Hau & Corlett 2003<br />

Tested us<strong>in</strong>g 4 native tree species:<br />

‣ below ground competition with grasses<br />

‣ seasonal drought<br />

‣ low soil fertility 45 degrees<br />

All 3 factors can<br />

significantly impair<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth but that<br />

their relative importance<br />

differs among species.


Natural barriers - Seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth &<br />

survival<br />

Hau & S0 2003<br />

• Reported another 8 native species planted on a<br />

grassland at Tai Mo Shan<br />

• Survival (2 year) between ~50 – 97% for all<br />

except one species.<br />

• Reached 2 m <strong>in</strong> two<br />

years for most of<br />

the species


Natural<br />

barriers<br />

All natural<br />

barriers tested<br />

appears to be<br />

selective<br />

barriers only!<br />

Modified from<br />

Nepstad et al. 1990<br />

Degraded<br />

hillside<br />

Mortality<br />

Drought<br />

_<br />

Fores<br />

t<br />

Dispersal<br />

+ _<br />

Mature<br />

Germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Trees<br />

_<br />

Sprout<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Grazers<br />

_ Non-trophic animal<br />

Growth<br />

damage ?<br />

_ _<br />

Attractants?<br />

Seed Pool Relict seeds<br />

Fruit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

_ Predators<br />

Shade<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Pool<br />

Relict roots


1997<br />

Up to 50,000<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs/ year<br />

Local seeds<br />

Field plant<strong>in</strong>g trials


S<strong>in</strong>ce 1997…<br />

• 200 native tree and some shrub species<br />

of over 200,000 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs produced.<br />

• For use <strong>in</strong> voluntary, commercial and<br />

government reforestation projects<br />

• Public education programmes<br />

• Also used <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g research works<br />

of local universities (8 MPhil projects<br />

and numerous undergraduate projects)<br />

• And some basic research works


Germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

tests<br />

Cell tray-75 compartments<br />

- > 121 species tested<br />

- 75 species > 50 % germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate<br />

- plus 30 other species known to germ<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

well from past experiences


Nursery growth rate tests<br />

- Around 90% of the species grown <strong>in</strong> the nursery could rich<br />

the transplant<strong>in</strong>g size of 30-50 cm <strong>in</strong> 18 months.


Other research work <strong>in</strong> the<br />

nursery<br />

Quality<br />

stock<br />

Mycorrhizas<br />

Nitrogenfix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

native<br />

tree species<br />

Genetic<br />

diversity


Other research work <strong>in</strong> the nursery<br />

• Mycorrhizas<br />

• Genetic diversity<br />

• Nitrogen-fix<strong>in</strong>g native tree species<br />

- Exam<strong>in</strong>ed the N-fix<strong>in</strong>g ability<br />

of native legume species<br />

- Attempted artificial<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation <strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

production<br />

- Ng and Hau 2009


Other field plant<strong>in</strong>g trials <strong>in</strong> different restoration sites<br />

3 years 3 years<br />

5 years 5 years


Research works <strong>in</strong> exotic plantations<br />

Lee, Hau & Corlett 2005; 2008<br />

‣Natural regeneration <strong>in</strong> exotic tree plantations<br />

Lee 2004; Yu 2007<br />

‣ Enrichment plant<strong>in</strong>g/direct seed<strong>in</strong>g of native<br />

species <strong>in</strong> exotic plantations<br />

Hung 2010<br />

‣ Th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g plus enrichment plant<strong>in</strong>g/direct<br />

seed<strong>in</strong>g of native species <strong>in</strong> exotic plantations


From 57 native species <strong>in</strong> 8 plant<strong>in</strong>g trials:<br />

Framework species criteria<br />

Toughness<br />

Attractiveness to wildlife/ Early<br />

production of wildlife resources<br />

Regenerative ability<br />

Keystone species<br />

Architecture<br />

Vigour<br />

<strong>Species</strong> with limited dispersal<br />

mechanism<br />

<strong>Species</strong> (13 species)<br />

Gordonia axillaris; Schefflera heptaphylla;<br />

Mallotus paniculatus<br />

Schefflera heptaphylla; Mallotus paniculatus;<br />

Microcos paniculata; Ardisia crenata;<br />

Melicope pteleifolia; Aporosa dioica<br />

Schefflera heptaphylla; Mallotus paniculatus;<br />

Microcos paniculata; Choerospondias axillaris;<br />

Machilus breviflora<br />

Aporosa dioica; Litsea glut<strong>in</strong>osa, Ilex rotunda,<br />

Schefflera heptaphylla<br />

Mallotus paniculatus; Choerospondias axillaris<br />

Schefflera heptaphylla; Machilus breviflora;<br />

Gordonia axillaris; Cyclobalanopsis championii<br />

Cyclobalanopsis championii; C. neglecta; C.<br />

edithiae; Lithocarpus harlandii


Propagat<strong>in</strong>g the framework tree species<br />

<strong>Species</strong><br />

Family<br />

Easy to<br />

propagate<br />

Notes<br />

Ardisia crenata Myrs<strong>in</strong>aceae No Low growth rate<br />

Choerospondias axillaris Anacardiaceae Yes<br />

Cyclobalanopsis championii Fagaceae Yes Form<strong>in</strong>g Ectomycorrhizas<br />

Cyclobalanopsis neglecta Fagaceae Yes Form<strong>in</strong>g Ectomycorrhizas<br />

Gordonia axillaris Theaceae No Low germ<strong>in</strong>ation & growth rates<br />

Ilex rotunda Aquifoliaceae No Low germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate<br />

Machilus breviflora Lauraceae Yes<br />

Mallotus paniculatus Euphorbiaceae Yes<br />

Melicope pteleifolia Rutaceae No Low germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate<br />

Microcos paniculata Tiliaceae Yes Medium germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate<br />

Schefflera heptaphylla Araliaceae Yes<br />

Schima superba Theaceae No Low germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate<br />

Zanthoxylum avicennae Rutaceae Yes Medium germ<strong>in</strong>ation rate


No. of trees planted <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Year<br />

1999/00 1.5<br />

2000/01 1.6<br />

2001/02 1.8<br />

2002/03 2.5<br />

2003/04 3.2<br />

2004/05 1.8<br />

2005/06 2.3<br />

2006/07 2.0<br />

2007/08 1.6<br />

2008/09 1.3<br />

Total 19.6<br />

No. of trees planted <strong>in</strong> HK (million)<br />

On average, 90% were<br />

planted <strong>in</strong> hillside reforestation<br />

Source: Development Bureau Green<strong>in</strong>g Website<br />

http://www.devb-wb.gov.hk/green<strong>in</strong>g/en/<strong>in</strong>dex.htm


The vegetation cover of Hong Kong<br />

Dudgeon & Corlett 1994 ERM 2002<br />

Vegetation cover Area (km 2 ) % of the total<br />

land area<br />

Area (km 2 )<br />

% of the total<br />

land area<br />

Shrublands 396 37 224.5 20.1<br />

Grasslands 177 16.5 347.8 31.1<br />

Secondary forest 86 8 184.0 16.5<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>ation 62 5.8 1.8 0.16<br />

Despite forest succession and active<br />

reforestation, the forest cover <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong<br />

is not <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g significantly <strong>in</strong> the last two<br />

decades.


North Lantau<br />

Tai Mo Shan<br />

Rob<strong>in</strong>’s Nest (Hung Fa Leng)<br />

Shek O


The impact of hill fire


The impact of hill fire<br />

Hill fires <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong<br />

• 1159 fires from 1993-2004 <strong>in</strong> Country Parks (on<br />

average 105 fires/yr)<br />

• Most frequently burnt are grassland and<br />

shrubland<br />

• Closed canopy forests do not burn<br />

• There is no natural hill fire <strong>in</strong> HK<br />

Anthropogenic hill fires<br />

‣ Festival fires (Apr., Oct.)<br />

‣ Accidental fires (careless visitors)<br />

‣ Arson


Ecological reforestation - The landscape<br />

approach<br />

• The current afforestation approach on site by<br />

site basis <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong does not work!<br />

• Many young plant<strong>in</strong>g sites have<br />

been destroyed by hill fires <strong>in</strong><br />

the last decade cost<strong>in</strong>g millions<br />

of dollars<br />

• A new reforestation approach<br />

on landscape level <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fire prevention is needed


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

A Feasibility Study of Hill Fire Management on Tai<br />

Mo Shan us<strong>in</strong>g GIS Analysis (Chan 2005)<br />

1 km strip from<br />

the boundaries<br />

of the 3<br />

Country Parks


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

a. Historical fire data (1993-2004) - from the government<br />

Fire Control Centre<br />

b. Vegetation map - from ERM Hong Kong Ltd.<br />

c. Geographical data - from Lands Department<br />

d. Registered grave sites - from Lands Department<br />

• Historical fires<br />

‣ Fire frequency<br />

‣ Fire size<br />

• Vegetation (fuel)<br />

‣ Close canopy forests<br />

‣ Shrubland<br />

‣ Grassland<br />

• Topology<br />

‣ Slope<br />

‣ Aspect<br />

‣ Elevation<br />

• Man-made structures<br />

‣ Grave sites<br />

‣ Roads & paths<br />

‣ Build-up areas<br />

‣ Villages<br />

• Weather data<br />

‣ W<strong>in</strong>d


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

RESULTS<br />

Festival fires: Fire sources and fire prone areas


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

RESULT Non-festival Fires: Fire sources and fire prone areas


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

RESULT: Fire break design


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

Conclusion for Tai Mo Shan<br />

- First 10 years or so should focus on firebreak<br />

construction to isolate fire sources;


<strong>Forest</strong> reforestation - The landscape approach<br />

Conclusion for Tai Mo Shan<br />

- After the firebreaks become effective, allow<br />

natural succession to restore native biomass;<br />

- Assist succession by add<strong>in</strong>g plant diversity;<br />

- Use cheaper methods such as direct seed<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

plant<strong>in</strong>g island patches or corridors l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

established forest patches to speed up<br />

succession.<br />

This scheme could be applied to other parts of HK


From the late 90s to now…<br />

• The government has <strong>in</strong>cluded more native species<br />

<strong>in</strong> its restoration project (normally not more than<br />

50%);<br />

• The government is conduct<strong>in</strong>g large scale th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and enrichment plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> exotic plantations;<br />

• Commercial nurseries have steady supply of a<br />

limited number of native tree and shrub species (c.<br />

20 species)<br />

• The government is also plant<strong>in</strong>g more native tree<br />

and shrub species on roadside slopes<br />

• The landscape level restoration approach is yet to<br />

be adopted by the government.


Experiences from Hong Kong<br />

‣ Landscape level approach is needed for large<br />

scale reforestation<br />

‣ Identify the real barriers (natural and artificial) to<br />

forest regeneration<br />

‣ Reset priorities. In our case, fire prevention<br />

obviously has much higher priority.<br />

‣ Natural succession alone can only restore native<br />

biomass, human <strong>in</strong>tervention is needed to restore<br />

diversity.<br />

‣ Lobby<strong>in</strong>g the Government is important


References<br />

Au, A.Y.Y., Corlett, R.T. & Hau, B.C.H. 2006. Seed ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to upland plant communities<br />

<strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. <strong>Plant</strong> Ecology, <strong>in</strong> press.<br />

Chan, W.H. 2005. A Feasibility Study of Hill Fire Management <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong Country<br />

Parks us<strong>in</strong>g GIS Analysis. MSc Dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.<br />

Chau, K.C. 1994. The Ecology of Fire <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. PhD Thesis, The University of<br />

Hong Kong, Hong Kong.<br />

Chick, H.L. 2005. Direct seed<strong>in</strong>g of native species for reforestation on degraded<br />

hillsides <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. MPhil thesis, The University of Hong Kong.<br />

Chung, K.P.S. (<strong>in</strong> press). The role of seed predation on natural forest regeneration <strong>in</strong><br />

Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. PhD. thesis, The University of Hong Kong.<br />

Dudgeon, D. and Corlett, R.T. 1994. Hills and Streams: An Ecology of Hong Kong.<br />

Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, 234 pp.<br />

ERM (Environmental Resources Management Hong Kong Ltd.). 2002. Environmental<br />

Basel<strong>in</strong>e Survey Report: Terrestrial Habitat Mapp<strong>in</strong>g and Rank<strong>in</strong>g Based on<br />

Conservation Value. Environmental Protection Department, the Government of<br />

the Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. 80pp.


Hau, C.H. 1997. Tree seed predation on degraded hillsides <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. <strong>Forest</strong><br />

Ecology & Management, 99:215-221.<br />

Hau, B.C.H. & Corlett, R.T. 2003. Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the early survival and growth of<br />

native tree seedl<strong>in</strong>gs planted on a degraded hillside grassland <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a. <strong>Restoration</strong> Ecology, 11(4):483-488.<br />

Hau, B.C.H. and So, K.K.Y. 2003. <strong>Us<strong>in</strong>g</strong> native tree species to restore degraded<br />

hillsides <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Pp. 179-190 <strong>in</strong> Sim, H.C., S. Appanah and P.B.<br />

Durst (Eds.), Br<strong>in</strong>g Back the <strong>Forest</strong>s: Policies and Practices for Degraded Lands<br />

and <strong>Forest</strong>s. FAO, Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

Hau, B.C.H., So, K.K.Y., Choi, K.C. and Chau, R.Y.H. 2005. <strong>Us<strong>in</strong>g</strong> native tree and<br />

shrub species for ecological rehabilitation of man-made slopes <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. In:<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 25th Annual Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, Geotechnical Division, The Hong Kong<br />

Institute of Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, 4 May 2005, Hong Kong, pp273-286.<br />

Hung, .T.H. 2010. <strong>Native</strong> plant regeneration <strong>in</strong> exotic tree plantation <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Unpublished MPhil thesis. The University of Hong Kong.<br />

Lee, E.W.S. 2004. Colonization of exotic plantations by native plants and mammals<br />

<strong>in</strong> Hong Kong. Unpublished MPhil thesis. The University of Hong Kong.<br />

Lee, E.W.S., Hau, B.C.H. and Corlett, R.T. 2005. Natural regeneration <strong>in</strong> exotic tree<br />

plantations <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. <strong>Forest</strong> Ecology and Management, 212:358-<br />

366.


Lee, E.W.S., Hau, B.C.H. and Corlett, R.T. 2008. Seed ra<strong>in</strong> and natural<br />

regeneration <strong>in</strong> Lophostemon confertus plantations <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

New <strong>Forest</strong>s 35:119-130.<br />

Lui, B.L.S., Shiu, Y.K. and Hau, B.C.H. 2005. Performance assessment of<br />

green<strong>in</strong>g techniques on man-made slopes. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 25th<br />

Annual Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, Geotechnical Division, The Hong Kong Institute of<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, 4 May 2005, Hong Kong, pp273-286.<br />

Nepstad, D., Uhl, C. and Adilson Serrao, E. (1990) Surmount<strong>in</strong>g barriers to<br />

forest regeneration <strong>in</strong> abandoned highly degraded pastures: a case study<br />

from Paragom<strong>in</strong>as, Para, Brazil. In: Alternatives to Deforestation: steps<br />

towards susta<strong>in</strong>able use of the Amazon ra<strong>in</strong>forest. (A.B. Anderson, ed.) pp.<br />

215–29. Columbia: Columbia University Press.<br />

Ng, A.Y.S. and Hau, B.C.H. 2009. Nodulation of native woody legumes <strong>in</strong> Hong<br />

Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. <strong>Plant</strong> and Soil 316:35-43.<br />

Stoke, E. 2005. Hedda Morrison’s Hong Kong 1946-1947. Hong Kong University<br />

Press.<br />

Weir, J.E.S. & Corlett, R.T. 2006. How far do birds disperse seeds <strong>in</strong> the<br />

degraded tropical landscape of Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a? Landscape Ecology, <strong>in</strong><br />

press.


Yu, M.Y. 2007. Enrich<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Native</strong> Floristic Diversity <strong>in</strong> Exotic Tree <strong>Plant</strong>ation <strong>in</strong><br />

Hong Kong. Unpublished MPhil thesis. The University of Hong Kong.<br />

Zhuang, X.Y. and Corlett, R.T., 1997. <strong>Forest</strong> and forest succession <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 14:857-866.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!