A Feasibility Study for the Establishment of Xuan Lien Nature ...

BirdLife International Vietnam Programme 

in collaboration with the 

Forest Inventory and Planning Institute 

A Feasibility Study for the Establishment of 

Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, 

Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. 

Conservation Report 

Number 7 

BirdLife International Danida FIPI

A Feasibility Study for the Establishment of 

Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, 

Thanh Hoa Province,Vietnam 

by 

Le Trong Trai 


with contributions from 

Le Van Cham, 

Bui Dac Tuyen, 

Tran Hieu Minh 

and 

Tran Quang Ngoc 


and 

Nguyen Van Sang, 

Alexander L. Monastyrskii 

and 

Jonathan C. Eames 

BirdLife International Vietnam Programme 

This is a technical report for the project entitled: 

Expanding the Protected Areas Network in Vietnam for the 21 st Century. 

Hanoi 

June 1999

Project Coordinators: Nguyen Huy Phon 

Vu Van Dung 

Jonathan C. Eames 

Field Survey Team: Le Trong Trai (FIPI) 

Le Van Cham (FIPI) 

Bui Dac Tuyen (FIPI) 

Tran Hieu Minh (FIPI) 

Tran Quang Ngoc (FIPI) 

Nguyen Van Sang (BirdLife International Vietnam Programme) 

Alexander Monastyrskii (BirdLife International Vietnam Programme) 

Jonathan C. Eames (BirdLife International Vietnam Programme) 

Maps: Mai Ky Vinh (FIPI) 

Project Funding: European Union and BirdLife International 

Cover Illustration: Thai woman harvesting rice in the buffer zone of Xuan Lien proposed nature 

reserve. Photo: J. C. Eames 

Citation: Le Trong Trai, Le Van Cham, Bui Dac Tuyen, Tran Hieu Minh, Tran Quang 

Ngoc, Nguyen Van Sang, Monastyrskii, A. L. and Eames, J. C. (1999) A Feasibility 

Study for the Establishment of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, Thanh Hoa 

Province, Vietnam. BirdLife International Vietnam Programme, Hanoi 

Copies available from: BirdLife International Vietnam Programme 

11 Lane 167, Tay Son, Dong Da 

Hanoi, Vietnam 

Tel/Fax: + (84) 4 851 7217 

E-mail: birdlife@netnam.org.vn

Table of Contents 

Executive Summary vii 

Executive Summary in Vietnamese ix 

1. Introduction 1 

1.1 Geography, Demographics, Economics and Environment 1 

1.2 Conservation 1 

1.3 Forest in Thanh Hoa Province 2 

1.4 Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve 3 

2. Site Features 4 

2.1 Biogeography 4 

2.2 Location 4 

2.3 Topography 4 

2.4 Meteorology 4 

2.5 Hydrology 5 

2.6 Geomorphology 6 

2.7 Soil 7 

2.8 Flora Overview 7 

2.9 Vegetation Types 8 

Medium to High Montane Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Evergreen Forest 10 

Low Montane Broadleaf Evergreen Forest 11 

Secondary Forest Types 12 

2.10 Mammals 13 

Mammal Records 13 

2.11 Birds 15 

Bird Records 15 

Habitat Distribution of Bird and Mammal Species 15 

Exploitation of Mammals and Birds 16 

2.12 Herpetiles 16 

2.13 Butterflies 17 

2.14 Socio-Cultural Features 18 

Demographics 18 

Economic Activities 19 

Infrastructure 20 

3. Evaluation 21 

3.1 Criteria for Evaluating the Proposed Nature Reserve 21 

3.2 Evaluation of Biological Factors 22 

Biodiversity 22 

Habitat 24 

Endangered Species 24 

Endemism 25 

3.3 Evaluation of Economic Factors 25 

Watershed Protection 25 

Soil Conservation 25 

Forestry Resources 25 

Medicinal and Ornamental Plants 25 

Tourism 26 

i

ii 

3.4 Evaluation of Socio-economic Factors 26 

Population and Social Conditions 26 

Infrastructure 26 

4. Management Considerations 27 

4.1 Physical Factors 27 

4.2 Biological Factors 27 

4.3 Socio-cultural Factors 27 

5. Management Recommendations 29 

5.1 Management Objectives 29 

5.2 Management Authority 29 

5.3 Proposed Boundary of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 29 

Option One 29 

Option Two 31 

5.4 Management Areas 32 

Strict Protection Area 32 

Forest Rehabilitation Area 32 

5.5 Buffer Zone 33 

5.6 Development of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 34 

Investment Plan 34 

Capital Construction Programme 34 

5.7 Future Plan for the Establishment of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 34 

5.8 Priority Actions 35 

References 36 

Appendix 1: Flora Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 38 

Appendix 2: Mammals Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 39 

Appendix 3: Birds Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 41 

Appendix 4: Herpetiles Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 45 

Appendix 5: Butterflies Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 47 

List of Tables 

Table 1: Metereological Data from Three Weather Stations near Xuan Lien Proposed Nature 5 

Reserve 

Table 2: Hydrological Features of the Chu River at Bai Thuong Dam 6 

Table 3: Floral Diversity of the Study Area 7 

Table 4: Globally Threatened Plants Recorded in the Study Area 8 

Table 5: Existing Vegetation Types in the Study Area 8 

Table 6: Composition of Mature Trees in Medium to High Montane Mixed Coniferous and 10 

Broadleaf Evergreen Forest at 1,200 m 

Table 7: Composition of Mature Trees in Medium to High Montane Mixed Coniferous and 10 


Table 8: Globally Threatened Mammals Recorded in the Study Area 14 

Table 9: Endemic and Globally Threatened Bird Species Recorded in the Study Area 15 

Table 10: Endemic and Globally Threatened Herpetiles Recorded in the Study Area 16 

Table 11: Herpetile Species with Restricted Habitat Distributions 17 

Table 12: Distribution of Butterfly Species with respect to Habitat Type 17 

Table 13: Conservation Criteria and Evaluation of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 21 

Table 14: Comparison of Plant Diversity in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve with other 22 

Protected Areas in Central Vietnam (Ranked)

Table 15: Comparison of Vertebrate Diversity of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 22 

with other Protected Areas in Central Vietnam (Ranked) 

Table 16: Comparison of Herpetile Diversity of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 23 

with other Areas in Northern and Central Vietnam (Ranked) 

Table 17: Sorenson’s Similarity Index (C S ) comparing Butterfly Species Composition in 23 

Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve with those in other Protected Areas in Northern 

and Central Vietnam 

Table 18: Number of Nationally and Globally Threatened Species in the Study Area 24 

Table 19: Distribution of Threatened and Near-threatened Bird Species in Protected Areas in 24 

Thanh Hoa and Nghe An Provinces 

Table 20: Management Regime for the Strict Protection Area 32 

List of Maps 

Map 1: Location of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve vi 

Map 2: Land-use in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 9 

Map 3: Proposed Boundary of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 30 

iii

iv 

Acknowledgements 

The authors would like to gratefully thank the European Union and BirdLife International for the 

financial assistance that made this study possible. 

During the implementation of the project, the authors have enjoyed the support of, and the opportunity 

to collaborate with, many agencies and individuals. We would like to take this opportunity to express 

our sincerest thanks to these agencies and individuals. 

We particularly wish to convey our gratitude to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development 

(MARD), especially Prof Dr Nguyen Quang Ha, Vice Minister of MARD, Mr Nguyen Cat Giao, 

former Director, and Mr Nguyen Khac Huong, Deputy Director of the International Cooperation 

Department, and Mr Nguyen Ba Thu, Director of the Forest Protection Department (FPD). Special 

thanks are also due to Mr Nguyen Mong Giao and Mr Tran Quoc Bao, officials of the Protection 

Forests and Nature Conservation Section of FPD. 

We are also grateful to Dr Le Sau, Director of the Forest Inventory and Planning Institute (FIPI) and 

Mr Nguyen Huu Dong, Director of the Forest Resources and Environment Centre (FREC) of FIPI. 

Sincere thanks are also expressed to Associated Dr Nguyen Huy Phon, Deputy Director of FIPI, and 

Mr Vu Van Dung, Deputy Director of FREC, who have directly guided the project activities, stipulated 

the implementation process and made comments on the project report. 

In Thanh Hoa province, we sincerely thank the leaders of the provincial people’s committee. Particular 

thanks are also conveyed to Mr Hoang Cao Trai, Deputy Director of the provincial FPD, and Mr Le 

The Long, Head of the Forest Protection and Management Section of the provincial FPD. We are also 

grateful to Mr Nguyen Van Mia and all staff of the FPD of Thuong Xuan district who participated in 

the collection of data. Sincere thanks are also due to Mr Vi Mai Ke, Chairman of Thuong Xuan district 

who created favourable conditions for the mission during the survey and for the collection of socioeconomic 

data for the district and communes in the area. 

We also would like to take this opportunity to express our sincere thanks to the officers and soldiers at 

border army station 505, Bat Mot commune, Thuong Xuan district, who assisted the team in the 

survey of forest areas managed by the post. 

We would finally like to thank Paul Lloyd and David Wege for their assistance in editing earlier drafts 

of this report.

Conventions Used 

Plant names, sequence and species limits follow Pham Hoang Ho (1991). Mammal names (common 

and scientific), sequence and species limits follow Corbet and Hill (1992), with scientific names given 

at first mention and in Appendix 2. Bird names (common and scientific), sequence and species limits 

follow Inskipp et al. (1996), with scientific names given at first mention and in Appendix 3. Herpetile 

names, sequence and species limits follow Nguyen Van Sang and Ho Thu Cuc (1996). Butterfly names, 

sequence and species limits follow Corbet et al. (1992), Pinratana (1977-1988) and other, more recently 

published, literature. 

Diacritical marks are omitted from Vietnamese names due to typographical limitations and the restricted 

understanding of international readers. 

Locality names follow the Department of Cartography 1:50,000 series maps (1978). 

A globally threatened species is any species assigned a category of threat in the IUCN Red Lists of 

Threatened Animals and Plants (IUCN 1996 and 1997); the term excludes species listed as Nearthreatened, 

Data Deficient or Insufficiently Known. 

Indochina refers to the biogeographic region of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. 

The study area refers to Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve, Thuong Xuan district, Thanh Hoa province. 

Abbreviations and Acronyms Used 

EU - European Union 

FIPI - Forest Inventory and Planning Institute, Hanoi 

FPD - Forest Protection Department 

FREC - Forest Resources and Environment Centre of FIPI 

GNP - Gross National Product 

IUCN - World Conservation Union 

MARD - Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development 

MPI - Ministry of Planning and Investment 

Disclaimer 

This report does not contain any endorsement by the authors, BirdLife International, FIPI or the 

European Union, either implied or otherwise, of the proposal to establish the Cua Dat hydroelectric 

dam and reservoir. 

v

vi 

Map 1: Location of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 

Map based on field survey in 1998 

Grid: UTM, zone 48; units: metric 

SCALE: 1:2,000,000 

LEGEND 

Vietnam / Lao Border 

Provincial Border 

Road 

River 

Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

Protected Area 

Produced by the Forest Resources 

and Environment Centre of FIPI

Executive Summary 

This report is an expanded translation of a feasibility study for the establishment of Xuan Lien proposed 

nature reserve, Thanh Hoa province, originally published in Vietnamese in December 1998 by the 

Forest Inventory and Planning Institute (FIPI) in collaboration with BirdLife International. The objectives 

of the original report were to assess the biological and economic value of Xuan Lien, and the feasibility 

of establishing a nature reserve in the area. The objective of this report is to provide a higher level of 

detail for an international audience interested in Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve. 

Within the framework of the European Union funded project entitled “Expanding the protected areas 

network in Vietnam for the 21 st Century”, a biodiversity and socio-economic survey of south-western 

Thuong Xuan district, Thanh Hoa Province was carried out in October and November 1998 by FIPI 

and BirdLife International. The results of the survey were used to produce a feasibility study for the 

establishment of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

The survey revealed moderate levels of biodiversity relative to other protected areas in northern and 

central Vietnam. In total, 560 plant species, 38 species of mammals, 134 species of birds, 53 species of 

herpetiles and 143 species of butterflies were found. Several of these species are globally threatened, 

including six species of plant, 10 species of mammal, two species of bird and one species of herpetile. 

The survey was undertaken during the autumn when activity levels amongst birds and butterflies are 

depressed. This may have resulted in the species richness of these groups being under-recorded. Future 

surveys should be undertaken during the spring, which is the peak season for bird and butterfly activity. 

Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve supports four plant species endemic to Vietnam (Cinnamomum 

balansae, Colona poilanei, Croton bonianus and Macaranga balansae), two bird species endemic to 

Vietnam and Laos (Red-vented Barbet Megalaima lagrandieri and Short-tailed Scimitar Babbler 

Jabouilleia danjoui) and one amphibian species endemic to Vietnam (Rana microlineata). Ten endemic 

species of butterflies were recorded, concentrated in two families: the Satyridae and Amathusiidae. 

Large mammals recorded in the area included Tiger Panthera tigris, Gaur Bos gaurus, Asiatic Black 

Bear Ursus thibetanus and Sun Bear U. malayanus, although populations of many of these species are 

small and fragmented as a result of high hunting pressure. Furthermore, it is unlikely that Xuan Lien 

proposed nature reserve is large enough, by itself, to maintain viable populations of these species. 

However, Xuan Lien is contiguous with Pu Hoat proposed nature reserve in Nghe An province, with a 

shared boundary of 20 km and a combined protected area coverage of 90,841 ha. 

One of the most significant results of the survey was the rediscovery of Roosevelt’s Muntjac Muntiacus 

rooseveltorum. This was the first time this species has been recorded since its discovery in Laos 69 years 

previously, and also the first time that this species has been recorded in Vietnam. Furthermore, the 

survey revealed one recently discovered butterfly species (Ypthima sp. nov.), along with six new species 

for Vietnam. 

As a result of the survey, two boundary options for Xuan Lien Nature Reserve were discussed at a 

workshop held in Thanh Hoa province in February 1999. Under option one, 16,500 ha would be 

included within the boundary of the nature reserve, whilst, under option two, 23,610 ha would be 

included, of which 18,522 ha would comprise forest of various types. Under neither of the options 

would the nature reserve contain any human settlement or permanent agricultural land. At the workshop, 

option two was decided upon. 

The survey results indicate that, apart from the occurance of Roosevelt’s Muntjac at this site, Xuan Lien 

vii

proposed nature reserve has low conservation importance relative to other sites in Thanh Hoa province 

and elsewhere in central Vietnam. Thanh Hoa Provincial People’s Committee should allocate the limited 

resources available to them for protected area establishment and management on the basis of the global 

conservation importance of each site. Areas of forest supporting potentially viable populations of globally 

threatened primates, particularly areas supporting the Critically Endangered Delacour’s Langur 

(Semnopithecus francoisi delacouri), such as Pu Luong proposed nature reserve and an area to the west 

of Cuc Phuong National Park, are higher priorities for conservation (F. Momberg verbally). 

If the project to construct a hydroelectric dam at Cua Dat goes ahead, the resulting reservoir will 

inundate 1,716 ha within the proposed nature reserve. The decision on whether or not to proceed with 

the Cua Dat dam should only be taken after a thorough and professionally conducted Environmental 

Impact Assessment has been undertaken. 

viii

Toùm taét döï aùn 

Baœn baùo caùo nghieân cöùu tính khaœ thi thaønh laäp Khu baœo toàn Thieân nhieân Xuaân Lieân, tænh 

Thanh Hoùa ñöôïc Vieän Ñieàu tra quy hoaïch röøng (FIPI) phoái hôïp vôùi toå chöùc BirdLife 

International taïi Vieät Nam cuøng bieân soaïn baèng tieáng Vieät vaøo thaùng 12 naêm 1998. Mucï ñích 

cuœa baœn baùo caùo goác nhaèm ñaùnh giaù giaù trò sinh hoïc, kinh teá cuœa khu vöïc Xuaân Lieân vaø tính 

khaœ thi thaønh laäp khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân trong vuøng. Muïc ñích cuœa baœn baùo caùo naøy 

nhaèm cung caáp nhöõng thoâng tin chi tieát cho caùc ñoäc giaœ Quoác teá quan taâm ñeán khu Baœo toán 

Thieân nhieân döï kieán Xuaân Lieân. 

Trong khuoân khoå döï aùn ñöôïc taøi trôï cuœa Coäng ñoàng chaâu AÂu mang teân “Môœ roäng heä thoáng 

röøng ñaëc duïng ôœ Vieät Nam cho theá kyœ 21”, moät ñôït khaœo saùt ña daïng sinh hoïc vaø daân sinhkinh 

teá ôœ phía taây baéc huyeän Tröôøng Xuaân, tænh Thanh Hoùa ñaõ ñöôïc FIPI vaø toå chöùc BirdLife 

International tieán haønh vaøo thaùng 10 vaø thaùng 11 naêm 1998. Keát quaœ cuœa ñôït khaœo saùt ñöôïc 

söœ duïng xaây döïng baùo caùo nghieân cöùu khaœ thi khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân Xuaân Lieân. 

Keát quaœ khaœo saùt naøy cho thaáy möùc trung bình cuœa tính ña daïng sinh hoïc cuœa khu vöïc so 

saùnh vôùi caùc khu baœo veä khaùc ôœ mieàn Baéc vaø mieàn Trung Vieät Nam. Toång soá coù 560 loaøi 

thöïc vaät, 39 loaøi ñoäng vaät, 134 loaøi chim, 53 loaøi eách, nhaùi, boø saùt, 143 loaøi böôùm ñaõ ghi 

nhaän ñöôïc. 

Ñaõ ghi nhaän moät soá loaøi ñang bò ñe doïa mang tính toaøn caàu, bao goàm coù 6 loaøi thöïc vaät, 10 

loaøi thuù, 2 loaøi chim vaø 1 loaøi boø saùt. Tuy vaäy ñôït khaœo saùt ñöôïc tieán haønh trong muøa thu 

neân möùc ñoä hoaït ñoäng cuœa caùc loaøi chim vaø caùc loaøi böôùm giaœm xuoáng . Ñieàu naøy daãn ñeán 

soá lieäu veà söï phong phuù bò thieáu huït .Caùc cuoäc khaœo saùt trong töông lai caàn ñöôïc tieán haønh 

giöõa muøa xuaân khi hoaït ñoäng cuœa caùc loaøi böôùm vaø chim ñaït ñænh ñieååm. 

Tính ñaëc höõu cuœa khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân Xuaân Lieân ôœ möùc ñoä trung bình: 4 loaøi thöïc vaät 

ñaëc höõu ( Cinnamomum balansae, Colona poilanei, Croton bonianus, Macaranga balansae), 

hai loaøi chim ñaëc höõu ( Megalaima lagrandieri, Jabouilleia danjoui ) vaø moät loaøi eách nhaùi ñaëc 

höõu ( Rana microlineata) ñaõ ñöôïc phaùt hieän.Möôøi loaøi böôùm ñaëc höõu ñaõ ñöôïc ghi nhaän, taäp 

trung vaøo hai hoï: Satyridae, Amthsiidae. 

Caùc loaøi thuù lôùn ñöôïc ghi nhaän trong khu bao goàm Hoå Panthera tigris, loaøi boø Toùt Bos 

gaurus, loaøi Gaáu ngöïa Ursus thibetanus vaø loaøi Gaáu Choù U. malayanus, maëc duø quaàn theå cuœa 

caùc loaøi naøy raát nhoœ vaø chia caét do aùp löïc cuœa saên baét. Hôn nöõa, khu Xuaân Lieân gaàn vôùi khu 

Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân döï kieán Puø Hoaït thuoäc tænh Ngheä An, coù chung 20 km ñöôøng ranh giôùi 

vaø toång dieän tích cuœa hai khu laø 90,841 ha. 

Moät trong nhöõng keát quaœ quan troïng thu ñöôïc töø ñôït khaœo saùt laø phaùt hieän loaøi Mang 

Roosevelt Muntiacus rooseveltorum. Loaøi naøy laàn ñaàu tieân ñöôïc phaùt hieän taïi Laøo caùch ñaây 

69 naêm, nhö vaäy ñaây laø laàn ñaàu tieân chuùng ñöôïc phaùt hieän ôœ Vieät Nam. Phaùt hieän naøy coù 

yù nghóa to lôùn ñoái vôùi khoa hoïc hôn nöõa, keát quaœ khaœo saùt cuõng ñaõ ghi nhaän moät loaøi böôùm 

vöøa môùi ñöôïc phaùt hieän ôœ Vieät Nam (Ypthima sp.nova), cuøng vôùi 6 loaøi ghi nhaän môùi cho 

Vieät Nam. 

Vôùi keát quaœ khaœo saùt ñaõ ñeà xuaát hai phöông aùn löïa choïn ranh giôùi cho khu Baœo toàn Thieân 

nhieân Xuaân Lieân. Hai phöông aùn naøy ñaõ ñöôïc thaœo luaän taïi cuoäc hoäi thaœo thaùng 2 naêm 1999 

taïi tænh Thanh Hoùa. Dieän tích ranh giôùi khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân theo löïa choïn 1 laø 16.500 

ha, theo löïa choïn 2 laø 23.610 ha, bao goàm 18.522 ha röøng caùc loaïi. Caœ hai giaœi phaùp trong 

khu baœo toàn khoâng coù khu daân cö vaø ñaát noâng nghieäp. Löïa choïn 2 ñaõ ñöôïc öu tieân, löïa 

choïn vaø thoâng qua taïi hoäi thaœo naøy. 

Keát quaœ khaœo saùt chæ ra raèng, beân caïnh vieäc phaùt hieän loaøi Mang Roosevelt coù yù nghóa lôùn 

ix

lao, khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân döï kieán Xuaân Lieân coù giaù trò baœo toàn ôœ caáp trung bình so vôùi 

caùc khu vöïc khaùc cuœa Thanh Hoùa cuõng nhö mieàn Trung Vieät Nam. UŒy ban nhaân daân tænh 

Thanh Hoaù neân caân ñoái nguoàn kinh phí haïn heïp moät caùch hôïp lyù cho vieäc thaønh laäp vaø 

quaœn lyù caùc khu Baœo toàn treân cô sôœ öu tieân cho nhöõng khu coù taàm quan troïng baœo toàn toaøn 

caàu. Chaúng haïn khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân döï kieán Puø Luoâng vaø vuøng ôœ phiaù Taây cuœa vöôøn 

quoác gia Cuùc Phöông laø nôi cö truù cuœa quaàn theå linh tröôœng bò ñe doïa toaøn caàu, cuï theå ñoái 

vôùi loaøi Vooïc quaàn ñuøi bò ñe doïa nghieäm troïng (Semnopithecus francoisi delacouri). Ñaây laø 

nhöõng nôi giöõ vò trí öu tieân haøng ñaàu cho coâng taùc baœo toàn (theo lôøi cuœa OÂng F. Momberg). 

Neáu döï aùn xaây döïng ñaäp thuœy ñieän Cöœa Ñaït ñöôïc thöïc hieän, keát quaœ hoà chöùa seõ laøm ngaäp 

1717 ha thuoäc khu Baœo toàn Thieân nhieân döï kieán. Vieäc quyeát ñònh thi coâng ñaäp Cöœa Ñaït hay 

khoâng caàn phaœi döïa treân cô sôœ quaù trình Ñaùnh giaù Taùc ñoäng Moâi tröôøng. 

x

1. Introduction 

1.1 Geography, Demographics, Economics and Environment 

Geography. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a relatively narrow strip running north-south along 

the eastern coast of the Indochinese Peninsula. With a 3,000 km coastline, Vietnam extends from 

23°37.5' to 8°00.5’N. It is approximately 525 km across at its widest point and 47 km across at its 

narrowest point. Vietnam’s total land area is 331,689 km 2 . Mountain ranges extend along Vietnam’s 

border with the People’s Republic of China in the north, and along the borders with the Lao People’s 

Democratic Republic and the Kingdom of Cambodia in the west. The highest point is Mount Fan Si 

Pan in the far north at 3,143 m, although average mountain altitudes are around 1,000 m. Vietnam is 

topographically complex with the exception of the narrow, coastal lowlands of the central region and 

the southern Mekong Delta region. 

Demographics. The population of Vietnam is approximately 77 million people (1998) with a growth 

rate of 2.3% (at this rate, the population will double in 32 years time). The country is comprised of 61 

provinces with 570 urban centres. Eighty percent of the population live in rural areas. Two cities have 

over 1 million inhabitants: Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon) and Hanoi, the capital. Literacy rates 

are high: 93% for males and 83% for females. Life expectancy is 62 years for males and 67 years for 

females (Pham Ngoc Dang 1998). 

Economics. Vietnam is currently undergoing an economic transition towards a more open economy. 

Vietnam’s annual per capita gross national product (GNP) is about US$250 (World Bank 1997). GNP 

has been growing rapidly for the past decade. Vietnam’s leading exports in order of contribution to 

GNP are crude oil, coal, rice, coffee, textiles, marine products, shoes, tea, cashew nuts and rubber. It is 

the world’s third largest rice exporter and the fifth largest coffee exporter. 

Environment. Economic growth, infrastructure development, population growth, protracted wars, 

and the development of agriculture, forestry and fishing industries have resulted in over-exploitation of 

Vietnam’s natural resources. The environment in Vietnam has largely been compromised; forest cover 

is estimated at less than 20% of the country’s total land area (less than 10% primary forest) (Vo Quy 

1998). Over the last two decades, there has been an average reduction of forest by 350,000 ha per year 

(Vo Quy 1998). Gross deforestation has been accompanied by degradation of arable land, soil erosion, 

destruction of water catchments, diminished groundwater sources, siltation and ecological degradation 

of coastal and submerged areas, and a loss of overall biodiversity within Vietnam. 

1.2 Conservation 

The Government of Vietnam recognised the necessity for conserving and rehabilitating the natural 

environment at the end of the 1970s. Its first priority was to provide areas for settling war veterans. The 

second priority was chemical detoxification and remediation for human resettlement of areas affected 

by chemical defoliants. The third priority was given to reforestation, establishing reserves and the 

conversion of forests into cultivated land (MOF 1991a). Only in the 1990s has the conservation emphasis 

moved towards protecting endangered habitats and species. 

Vietnam’s forests are divided into three categories (MOF 1991a,b): 

(a) Production Forests. These are forested areas which can be allocated to any organisation or 

individual (with management requirements and harvesting regulations) for domestic 

commercial timber needs as stipulated in Vietnam’s Forestry Law, Articles 28-34; 

1

Section 1 - Introduction 

2 

(b) Watershed Protection Forests. These forested areas can be allocated to forestry agencies, 

people’s committees, or to the people directly, with the main purposes of watershed 

protection, soil erosion control and foreshore protection with special provisions as per 

Articles 35-37; and 

(c) Special-use Forests. These are forested lands allocated for environment conservation, tourism, 

educational purposes, national defence, and other special uses. These lands can be allocated 

to organisations and agencies in the state forestry sector which are expected to generate 

revenues outside of the strict preservation areas and follow management procedures as per 

Articles 39-41. Special-use Forests are further subdivided into: 

(i) Cultural and Historical Sites to preserve and maintain areas of national and cultural 

interest and importance; 

(ii) Nature Reserves intended to preserve all representative forest types and to conserve 

biodiversity; and 

(iii) National Parks to protect and conserve all major types of wildlife and habitat types 

found within of Vietnam. 

Vietnam currently has proposals for 105 protected areas, comprising 976,000 ha or 3% of the total 

land area. Under Special-use Forest classification there are 10 national parks, 61 nature reserves, and 34 

cultural of historical sites (Dang Huy Huynh 1998). Vietnam is actively gazetting new sites as part of its 

treaty obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity. Under this treaty, Vietnam has agreed 

to increase its protected area system to 2,000,000 ha by the year 2000, thereby doubling its network of 

Special-use Forests. 

Vietnam supports approximately 275 mammal species, 826 bird species, 260 reptile species, 82 amphibian 

species, 500 freshwater fish species, 2,000 marine fish species and 12,000 plant species (Dang Huy 

Huynh 1998, MacKinnon 1996). 

1.3 Forest in Thanh Hoa Province 

The natural vegetation of Thanh Hoa province is semi-evergreen rainforest in the lowlands in the east 

and centre of the province, with sub-montane dry evergreen forest in the mountains in the west 

(MacKinnon 1996). A thin belt of limestone forest runs across the north of the province, along the 

borders with Ninh Binh and Hoa Binh provinces. 

In Thanh Hoa province, forest cover originally stretched from the coastal plains to the border with 

Laos. However, the coastal plains were almost entirely deforested prior to 1945 to make way for wet rice 

cultivation. Since then, there has been a gradual erosion of forest in the foothills and mountains in the 

centre and west of the province, as a result of shifting cultivation, commercial logging activities and 

resettlement of people from the lowlands. Between 1983 and 1995, 95,000 ha of forest was lost, at a 

rate of 8,000 ha per year (unpublished data from the Forest Inventory and Planning Institute (FIPI)). 

In the foothills, remaining forest areas are fragmented. However, large areas of continuous forest cover 

remain in the mountains close to the border with Laos. 

The current and proposed system of Special-use Forests in Thanh Hoa province includes Ben En National 

Park, in the south-east of the province, which covers 16,634 ha. Three proposed nature reserves in the 

west of the province, Pu Luong, Pu Hu and Xuan Lien, cover a further 56,857 ha. Additionally, limestone

Section 1 - Introduction 

forest areas in the north of the province are protected by Cuc Phuong National Park, which extends 

across three provinces: Thanh Hoa, Ninh Binh and Hoa Binh (Map 1). 

1.4 Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve 

Forests in the west of Thanh Hoa and Nghe An provinces protect the watershed of the Chu River, the 

second largest river in Thanh Hoa province. These forests include Pu Hoat proposed nature reserve in 

Que Phong district, Nghe An province, and areas in south-west Thuong Xuan district, Thanh Hoa 

province. In 1996, the Asian Development Bank provided assistance to plan for the protection of the 

western catchment of the Chu River. In 1997, Thanh Hoa Provincial Forest Protection Department 

(FPD) submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) to include 

the upstream area of the Chu River catchment in Thuong Xuan district, Thanh Hoa province in Vietnam’s 

system of Special-use Forests as Xuan Lien Nature Reserve. 

In October and November 1998, FIPI and the BirdLife International Vietnam Programme, in 

coordination with Thanh Hoa Provincial FPD, carried out a field survey of Xuan Lien proposed nature 

reserve as part of the EU-funded project “Expanding the Protected Areas Network in Vietnam for the 

21 st Century”. Data on the biodiversity, population and economic conditions in the area were collected, 

and two potential boundaries for the proposed nature reserve were identified. The data was used to 

prepare this feasibility study. 

This feasibility study is the initial step in the process to formally establish Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, 

Thanh Hoa province. This report is an English translation of the original feasibility study, which was 

published in Vietnamese in December 1998. 

3

4 

2. Site Features 

2.1 Biogeography 

According to the classification of MacKinnon (1996), Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is located in 

sub-unit 10b (North Indochina) of the Indo-Chinese sub-region; and, according to the classification of 

Wikramanayake et al. (1997), the proposed nature reserve is situated within the Northern Indochina 

Subtropical Forests Ecoregion. 

2.2 Location 

Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is located in Thuong Xuan district, Thanh Hoa province, and is 

bounded by the coordinates 19°52' to 20°02'N and 104°58' to 105°15'E (Map 1). The proposed 

nature reserve includes all or part of six communes: Bat Mot, Yen Nhan, Xuan Khao, Xuan Lien, Xuan My 

and Van Xuan. 

The proposed nature reserve is bordered by the Cao River to the north, the provincial border with 

Nghe An to the south and west, and the Ta Leo and Bu Khong mountains and the confluence of the 

Cao and Chu Rivers to the east. 

2.3 Topography 

The proposed nature reserve is situated in a belt of mountains running from Sam Neua in Laos to 

Thuong Xuan and Nhu Xuan districts in Thanh Hoa province. These mountains contain many high 

peaks, such as Ta Leo (1,400 m), Bu Cho (1,563 m), Bu Hon Han (1,208 m), and an unnamed 

1,605 m peak. The topography of the nature reserve is characterised by low mountains, dissected by 

deep, narrow valleys. 

Two main topographic forms dominate the area: 

(a) Medium High Mountains. Located at elevations of 800 to 1,600 m in the Cao and 

Nam Boo River basins, these mountains are dissected by deep, narrow valleys, sloping 

from west to east. Slopes are steep, averaging 35°. These areas cover a total of 4,289 ha or 

18% of the study area. 

(b) Low Mountains and Foothills These areas are located at elevations below 800 m and lie 

mainly in the east, in the Cao River basin, and in the south, near the border with Nghe 

An province. Slopes in these areas are generally shallower: on average 20 to 25° for the 

low mountain areas and 15 to 20° for foothill areas. The topography is less complex 

than in the higher areas. These areas cover a total of 19,321 ha, representing 82% of the 

study area. 

Several other topographic types also occur in the study area, though they cover only small, scattered 

areas. Karsts occur at elevations below 800 m and may have extremely steep slopes (60 to 70°) with 

vertical cliffs in places. Access to these areas is often difficult. The topography of valleys in the study 

area varies: valley floors are narrow in upstream areas, becoming wider in the lower sections of the Cao, 

Kue and Chu Rivers. Many of these lower sections have relatively flat, fertile valleys.

2.4 Meteorology 

Section 2 - Site Features 

The topography and geomorphology of the study area has affinities with the north-western regions of 

Vietnam. However, the climate is more similar to that of the lowlands and foothills of Thanh Hoa 

province. 

Data from nearby meteorological stations in Bai Thuong, Nhu Xuan and Quy Chau districts are indicative 

of the climatic conditions in the study area (Table 1). 

Table 1: Metereological Data from Three Weather Stations near Xuan Lien Proposed Nature 

Reserve 

Meteorological Data Bai Thuong Nhu Xuan Quy Chau 

Latitude 19°54'N 19°38'N 19°33'N 

Longitude 105°23'E 105°34'E 105°07'E 

Altitude (m) 21 10 87 

Period of measurements 1961 to 1995 1964 to 1995 1962 to 1995 

Annual mean temperature (°C) 23.3 23.3 23.1 

Absolute minimum temperature (°C) 2.6 3.1 0.6 

Absolute maximum temperature (°C) 41.5 41.7 41.3 

Total annual rainfall (mm) 1937.3 1790.4 1734.5 

Maximum daily rainfall (mm) 314.8 376.7 290.1 

Annual no. of rainy days 149 124 150 

Annual humidity (% RH) 85 85 86 

Evaporation (mm) 783 926 704 

The coldest month is January and the hottest months are June and July. The highest rainfall occurs 

during the six months from May to October. Rainfall is heaviest in August and September, with occasional 

high intensity rain events of greater than 350 mm per day. Rainfall during the rainy season accounts for 

90% of the total yearly rainfall. Heavy floods and erosion often occur in this period. The dry season 

occurs between November and April, with December to March being particularly dry. Annual mean 

humidity is 85% but may be as low as 16% in the dry season. Evaporation is highest during the dry 

season. 

Frosts often occur in winter, particularly during January and February, and most often in valleys, high 

hills and mountains. They usually last for one or two days but may be as prolonged as 10 days. 

Wind directions are generally, though not solely, seasonal: north-easterly in the dry season and southeasterly 

in rainy season. South-westerly and south-easterly winds may also occur in the dry season. In 

addition, hot, dry westerly winds, blowing from Laos to the centre of Vietnam often occur from May to 

August, affecting the valleys and low areas. Wind speeds can be strong, occasionally reaching force eight 

or nine. 

The combination of heavy rainfall over a short period of time and strong winds can cause sudden 

flooding of rivers and streams, and necessitates the adoption of precautionary measures in the planning 

of conservation and development projects. 

Climate is strongly influenced by topography and geomorphology. The average temperature in the foothills 

is 23°C, and in the mountains is 21°C. The minimum temperature in the mountains is 0.4°C. Rainfall 

averages between 1,700 and 2,000 mm. However, rainfall in the wetter areas averages between 2,000 and 

2,500 mm and may be up to 3,000 mm in some years. Rainfall in drier areas averages 1,400 mm, but may 

5


be as low as 1,060 mm in some years. The foothills have between 120 and 130 rainy days per year, while 

the mountains have 149 or 150. Evaporation is higher in the foothills (900 to 1,000 mm/year) than in the 

mountains (700 to 800 mm/year). 

6 

2.5 Hydrology 

There are three main river systems in the nature reserve: 

(a) Chu River Basin. The Chu River is the second largest river in Thanh Hoa province. The 

Chu River originates in Laos and flows through Nghe An province before passing through 

the proposed nature reserve. The Chu River is important for the transportation of goods 

and produce, water resources, hydro-electricity, irrigation, and drainage. The area of the 

Chu River watershed is 81,594 ha, excluding a section in Laos. The river bed is narrow, 

running through areas of high, sloping topography and has rapid currents. Table 2 

summarises the hydrological features of the Chu River, measured at Bai Thuong Dam. 

Table 2: Hydrological Features of the Chu River at Bai Thuong Dam 

Hydrological Feature Measurement 

Average annual flow volume (m 3 /yr) 4.57 x 10 9 

Average flow rate (m 3 /s) 145 

Dry season flow rate (m 3 /s) 23 

Rainy season flow rate (m 3 /s) 6,700 

Maximum (rainy season) water level (m) 21.41 

Minimum (dry season) water level (m) 15.80 

(b) Cao River Basin. The Cao River (also known as the Khao River) is the largest tributary of 

the Chu River and has a catchment of 30,587 ha. The river originates in the mountains in 

Bat Mot commune, runs through Yen Nhan and Xuan Khao communes and meets the 

Chu River at Lang Thon village. The upstream reaches of the Cao River are very narrow 

and steep, with many waterfalls; Tieu waterfall in Bat Mot commune, for example, is more 

than 60 m high. 

(c) Kue River Basin. The Kue River (also known as the Nam Bung) is also a large tributary of 

the Chu River. It drains the southern section of the study area. The river originates on the 

south-facing slopes of Ban Mua and Bu Hon Han mountains and flows through Bat Mot, 

and Xuan Lien communes before meeting the Chu River at the border between Thanh 

Hoa and Nghe An provinces. 

In addition to the Cao and Kue Rivers, numerous smaller tributaries of the Chu River originate in the 

study area. These include the Hon Yen stream originating on the north-east-facing slopes of the Bu 

Cho and Ta Leo mountains in the east of the study area. In general, water courses in the study area are 

permanent and fringed by intact forest cover. 

Surveys were undertaken at several sites to assess the hydrogeology of the region. Water was found at 1 

to 2 m below the surface at most sites located in valleys. The lowest water-table was found to be 7 to 8 

m below the surface. These results indicate that groundwater is abundant in the area. However, this is 

only a preliminary assessment of underground water resources due to the dearth of data on the 

groundwater characteristics of the region

2.6 Geomorphology 


The geology of the area is varied and includes sedimentary material (flagstone, limestone, precipitated 

sand and pebbles, and clay flagstone), schist, spilite, aldezite, and other metamorphic rocks such as 

marble and mica. These deposits are either separated evenly or closely intertwined. 

Generally, the mountains in central Vietnam, adjacent to the Laos border are formed from igneous 

material such as riolite and granite. They have sharp peaks and steep slopes compared to the surrounding 

mountains and hills, and were formed during the late Cretaceous period. 

The central low hills and mountain areas are less than 800 m high, averaging 400 to 500 m. They are 

formed from a variety of undivided red sedimentary rocks of the Jurassic period, including clay schist, 

aerolites, pebbles and some limestone. In western Thanh Hoa province, and in this area in particular, 

mining of minerals has taken place in the past, including tin, gold, pyrite and antimony. 

2.7 Soil 

The main soil types found in the study area are: 

(a) Feralite Humus Soil in Medium High Mountains (FH). This soil type covers 4,289 ha or 

18% of the study area. It is formed in hot, humid conditions, on steep slopes, without 

stagnant water or agglomeration but with a high proportion of humus (the humus ratio in 

the surface layer is over 8 to 10%). The soil layer is thin, red-yellow in colour and contains 

a high proportion of stones. This soil type is distributed between 800 and 1,700 m on Bu 

Hon Han and Ban Mua mountains, and in mountains on the borders with Nghe An 

province and Laos. 

(b) Feralite Soil in Lowlands (F): This soil type covers 19,321 ha or 82% of the study area. 

The colour of this typical feralite soil depends on the tectonic rock upon which it is based. 

It is found at elevations below 800 m and typically includes: 

(i) Yellow and Red Feralite Soil on Metamorphic Rock and Clay Schist in Lowlands (Fs). 

The mechanical composition is heavy, and the soil layer is thick and contains few 

stones. It is distributed in Bat Mot, Xuan Le and Xuan My communes; 

(ii) Light Yellow Feralite Soil on Sandstone in Lowlands (F9). The mechanical composition 

is light, and the soil layer is from thin to average and mixed with stones. It has a 

scattered distribution in Bat Mot, Yen Nhan, Xuan My, Van Xuan and Xuan Le 

communes; and 

(iii) Yellow and Red Feralite Soil on Magmatic Acidic Rock in Lowlands (Fa). The mechanical 

composition has an incohesive structure. The soil layer is thin and mixed with stones. 

It is mainly distributed in Yen Nhan, Xuan Lien, Xuan Khao, Xuan My, Van Xuan 

and Xuan Le communes. 

(c) River and Stream Alluvial Soil (P). This is a fertile soil, brown in colour, deeply layered, 

medium to light textured and porous. It is distributed along rivers and streams in the study 

area, most commonly in the lower basins of the Cao and Khue Rivers. This soil type covers 

less than 1% of the study area. 

7


8 

2.8 Flora Overview 

The field survey recorded 560 species of vascular 

plants in 381 genera and 124 families (Table 3). 

These species include 222 timber species, 31 

ornamental species and 116 species with known 

medicinal uses (Appendix 1). 

The flora of the proposed nature reserve is 

characterised by taxa indigenous to northern Vietnam and southern China, such as members of the 

Fagaceae and Lauraceae. In addition, there are two other major elements to the flora. The first is an 

Indo-Malayan element which includes members of the Dipterocarpaceae and Combretaceae together 

with a number of deciduous species such as Lagerstroemia tomentosa and Tetrameles nudiflora. The 

second is a temperate Sino-Himalayan element, characteristic of Yunnan and the Himalayan foothills; 

included in this element are several conifers and a number of broadleaf deciduous tree species. 

Of the 124 plant families represented, 12 families contain 10 or more species. These are the Euphorbiaceae 

(with 33 species), Lauraceae (25), Poaceae (22), Rubiaceae (20), Orchidaceae (20), Moraceae (18), Fagaceae 

(14), Fabaceae (14), Caesalpiniaceae (11), Asteraceae (11), Meliaceae (11) and Arecaceae (10). However, the 

most abundant species in the study area belong to the Dipterocarpaceae, Fagaceae, Lauraceae, Magnoliaceae, 

Sapotaceae, Sapindaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Meliaceae, Hamamelidaceae, Cupressaceae and Poaceae. Stands 

of bamboo, comprising species such as Neohouzeana dulloa and Dendrocalamus patellaris, are found in 

areas where the forest has been very heavily disturbed. The tree flora of medium to high montane mixed 

coniferous and broadleaf evergreen forest is dominated by Hopea mollissima (Dipterocarpaceae); although 

conifers, including Fokienia hodginsii, are also present in smaller numbers. Conifers and broadleaf trees 

together form significant stands of mixed forest, at elevations above 1,200 m. 

The conservation importance of several 

species is notable. Of the 560 species 

recorded during the field survey, four are 

endemic to Vietnam (Cinnamomum 

balansae, Colona poilanei, Croton boniana 

and Macaranga balansae) and six are 

listed as threatened in the IUCN Red List 

of Threatened Plants (IUCN 1997) 

(Table 4). 

2.9 Vegetation Types 

The results from the field 

survey show that forest covers 

78.5% of the total area, 

although a large proportion of 

this is bamboo forest with 

varying degrees of disturbance 

(Table 5 and Map 2). 

The classification of the main 

forest types in the study area 

Table 3: Floral Diversity of the Study Area 

Taxon Families Genera Species 

Lycopodiophyta 2 2 3 

Polypodiophyta 13 22 31 

Pinophyta 5 6 6 

Magnoliopsida 88 284 430 

Liliopsida 16 67 90 

Total 124 381 560 

Table 4: Globally Threatened Plants Recorded in the 

Study Area 

Species Current Status 

as per IUCN 1997 

Annamocarya sinensis R 

Calamus tonkinensis R 

Dalbergia tonkinensis V 

Fokienia hodginsii R 

Madhuca pasquieri R 

Parashorea chinensis R 

Notes: V = Vulnerable; R = Rare as per IUCN (1997). 

Table 5: Existing Vegetation Types in the Study Area 

Vegetation Type Area (ha) Percent 

Primary Forest 1,762 7.5 

Elfin Forest 481 2.0 

Mixed Bamboo and Broadleaf Forest 2,245 9.5 

Pure Bamboo Forest 8,691 36.8 

Regenerating Forest 5,343 22.6 

Scrub and Grassland 4,690 19.9 

Agricultural Land 398 1.7 

Total 23,610 100.0


follows Thai Van Trung (1978). Based on this classification, the following forest types are found in 

Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve: 

(a) medium to high montane mixed coniferous and broadleaf evergreen forest; 

(b) low montane broadleaf evergreen forest; and 

(c) secondary forest. 

Forest type (a) broadly equates to sub-montane dry evergreen forest in the classification developed by 

MacKinnon and MacKinnon (1986) (and refined by MacKinnon in 1996); whilst forest type (b) 

broadly equates to tropical semi-evergreen rainforest. 

9

10 

LEGEND 



District Border 

Commune Border 

Proposed Boundary of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

800 m Contour Line 

Stream or River 

LAND USE 

Elfin Forest 

Rich Forest 

Medium Forest 

Poor Forest 

Pure Bamboo Forest (Dendrocalamus) 

Pure Bamboo Forest ( Neohouzeana) 

Mixed Broadleaf and Neohouzeana Forest 

Mixed Broadleaf and Dendrocalamus Forest 

Regenerating Forest 

Grassland and Scrub 

Agricultural Land 



Map 2: Land-use in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 

SCALE: 1:120,000 


and Environment Centre of FIPI 

Section 2 - Site Features

Medium to High Montane Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Evergreen Forest 


This forest type is distributed between elevations of 800 and 1,605 m on Bu Cho, Ta Leo, Bu Hon Han 

and Ban Mua mountains. It occurs in areas with feralite soils, annual mean temperature of 20 to 22 0 C, 

average humidity of 86% and annual rainfall of greater than 2,000 mm. The dry season in these areas 

lasts for less than three months, and they experience more than 150 rainy days each year. 

This type of forest is generally undisturbed, 

although some small patches were cleared for 

hill rice cultivation in the past. Forest has since 

begun to regenerate in these areas. This forest 

type is dominated by tall broadleaf tree species. 

Many members of the Fagaceae are present, 

including Castanopsis spp., Lithocarpus spp. and 

Quercus fleuryi. Numerous species in the 

Lauraceae occur, many of which are widely 

distributed. The Dipterocarpaceae is represented 

by fewer species but these species are abundant 

in many areas. Coniferous species such as Fokienia hodginsii, Podocarpus imbricatus and Cunninghamia 

konishii are scattered throughout this forest type. Tables 6 and 7 show the tree composition of this forest 

type at two sample plots at different elevations. 

Many large trees in the Magnoliaceae occur in this forest type: Michelia spp., Manglietia spp. and 

Tsoongiodendron odorum. Specimens of Madhuca pasquieri can be found with diameters of 60 to 80 cm. 

In addition, the following families are also represented: Meliaceae (Aglaia spp.), Sapindaceae (Mischocarpus 

spp. and Pometia pinnata) and Ebenaceae (Diospyros spp). 

In undisturbed forest areas, trees with a mean 

diameter of 25 cm are interspersed with larger 

trees with diameters of over 50 cm. These larger 

trees include Madhuca pasquieri, Pometia 

pinnata, Michelia spp., Aglaia spp. and members 

of the Fagaceae. These trees have a mean timber 

volume of 150 to 200 m 3 /ha. 

This forest type is stratified into four layers: 

Table 6: Composition of Mature Trees in Medium 

to High Montane Mixed Coniferous and 


Taxon Density (%) Basal Area (%) 

Fagaceae 53 60 

Lauraceae 11 10 

Syzygium spp. 9 8 

Fokienia hodginsii 9 12 

Madhuca pasquieri 2 3 

Other species 16 7 

Table 7: Composition of Mature Trees in Medium 

to High Montane Mixed Coniferous and 


Taxon Density (%) Basal Area (%) 

Hopea mollissima 69 80 

Fagaceae 31 16 

Eberhardia tonkinensis 2 1 

Lauraceae 3 1 

Other species 5 2 

(a) Emergent Layer. This includes two valuable coniferous species (Fokienia hodginsii and 

Cunninghamia konishii). The trees have an average diameter of 70 to 80 cm and a height of 

30 to 35 m, significantly higher than the forest canopy layer. 

(b) Forest Canopy Layer. This is the dominant forest layer. A relatively even canopy, at a 

height of 20 to 22 m, is comprised predominantly of broadleaf tree species, such as Quercus 

spp., Lithocarpus spp., Hopea mollissima, Diospyros spp., Michelia spp. and Madhuca pasquieri. 

(c) Understorey. The understorey comprises many members of the Euphorbiaceae, Annonaceae, 

Theaceae and Rubiaceae. 

(d) Ground Layer. In addition to ferns, this layer includes species from the Araceae, Arecaceae 

and Marantaceae: Alocasia macrorrhiza, Homalonema occulta, Calamus platyacanthus, Rhapis 

macrantha and Phrynium spp. 

11


Regeneration of this forest type is good with a seedling density of 6,000 to 7,000 stems/ha. The density 

of mature trees and saplings with a height of more than 3 m is 2,500 to 3,000 stems/ha. In addition, the 

composition of immature trees is very similar to that of mature trees, indicating that this is a climax 

community. Regeneration in forest gaps created by natural tree-fall usually involves Ficus auriculata, 

Ormosia spp., Albizia chinensis, Sapium spp. and Trema orientalis. 

This forest type covers 4,289 hectares or 18% of the total area. Because this forest type has been 

subjected to minimal disturbance and is in a natural condition, it represents a good habitat for many 

animal species. 

Subtype: a) Mixed Coniferous and Broadleaf Forest Containing Fokienia hodginsii 

Two forest transects undertaken during the field survey identified areas of mixed forest of broadleaf and 

coniferous trees including Fokienia hodginsii. This forest subtype occurs at elevations above 1,000 m, 

on mountains such as Ta Leo, Bu Cho, Bu Hon Han and Ban Mua. F. hodginsii often grows on yellow, 

and yellow and red feralite soils with a thick humus layer, developed on igneous rocks such as riolite 

and granite. 

F. hodginsii occurs as emergent trees above the forest canopy with other coniferous species such as 

Cunninghamia konishii, Dacrycarpus imbricatus and species in the Fagaceae, Ericaceae, Lauraceae families. 

The average density of regenerating F. hodginsii seedlings is about 50 to 60 stems/ha. 

F. hodginsii generally occurs as mature trees with few immature specimens present, indicating a 

regeneration rate too low to maintain the species’ current distribution. The density of mature trees is 

only 5 to 6 trees/ha. Due to the extremely high economic value of this species, illegal exploitation has 

occurred in the past and continues at present. Consequently, the protection and regeneration of F. 

hodginsii is urgently required to restore and conserve this forest subtype, and, beyond the nature reserve, 

to ensure the supply of highly valuable trees in the future. 

Subtype: b) Elfin Forest 

Elfin forest occurs at elevations greater than 1,400 m on exposed mountain ridges and summits, such as 

on Ta Leo, Bu Cho, Bu Hon Han and Ban Mua mountains. These areas are characterised by frequent 

cloud cover at high elevations, high humidity and strong winds. Soils are light yellow, thin, with few 

stones and with little humus. Trees are overgrown with epiphytes, including mosses, ferns and orchids. 

Tree size varies with slope angle, elevation and thickness of the soil layer but trees generally have a 

twisted form, a diameter of under 10 cm and a height of 5 to 6 m. Common tree species include 

Rhododendron spp., Lithocarpus fissa, Rhodoleia championii, and Schefflera spp. 

Low Montane Broadleaf Evergreen Forest 

This forest type covers 697 hectares and accounts for 3% of the total area. It occurs at elevations of less 

than 800 m, on yellow and red feralite soil, developed on granite, sandstone and clay schist. The soil 

layer is of average to high thickness, although erosion has occurred in several areas as a result of shifting 

cultivation practised by local people. 

The vegetation in this forest type is generally complex and uneven due to the presence of many fastgrowing, 

light-demanding trees from the Euphorbiaceae, Myrtaceae, Meliaceae, Moraceae, Mimosaceae, 

Ebenaceae, Lauraceae, Fagaceae and Elaeocarpaceae. 

This forest type is stratified into three layers: 

12 

(a) Forest Canopy Layer. This is the ecologically dominant layer. It typically includes species 

from the following genera: Engelhardtia, Garcinia, Endospermum, Peltophorum, Adenanthera, 

Gironniera, Elaeocarpus, Litsea and Beilschmiedia. Mean tree diameter is 26 cm and tree

height varies from 20 to 25 m. 


(b) Understorey. The understorey is shaded by the upper layer. It includes many species from 

the Euphorbiaceae, Tiliaceae, Rutaceae and Rubiaceae. Mean tree diameter is less than 20 

cm and average tree height is 15 to 16 m. 

(c) Ground Layer. The ground layer comprises ferns, Calamus spp., Livistona chinensis, 

Plectocomia elongata and Alocasia macrorrhiza. 

In some stands of this forest type, larger trees are present, with diameters of around 80 cm and heights 

of 25 to 30 m. These species include Ficus spp. and Dracontomelon duperreanum; whilst Shorea chinensis 

also occurs in upstream areas. 

Regeneration of this forest type is generally good, with the density of seedlings reaching up to 8,000 

stems/ha, and the density of mature trees and saplings with a height of more than 3 m being about 

2,200 stems/ha. 

Secondary Forest Types 

Subtype: a) Pure Bamboo Forest 

Pure bamboo forest is concentrated at elevations below 800 m and is often distributed along the banks 

of rivers and streams or near villages. Pure bamboo forest develops on fallow agricultural land that has 

been left uncultivated for a period of time. The dominant species of bamboo are Neohouzeana dulloa, 

Dendrocalamus patellaris and Bambusa sp. Pure bamboo forest can be divided into two categories: 

• Pure Dendrocalamus forest 1,565 ha (6.6%) 

• Pure Neohouzeana forest 7,126 ha (30.2%) 

N. dulloa has a diameter of about 5 cm, a height of 11 m, a mature stem density of 400 stems/ha and a 

density of young regenerating plants of 12,000 to 13,000 stems/ha. D. patellaris has a diameter of 

about 4 cm, a height of 12 to 18 m. Bambusa has a diameter 5 to 6 cm, a height of 12m. Bambusa is 

often dispersed on the fringes of pure bamboo forest. 

Subtype: b) Mixed Bamboo and Broadleaf Evergreen Forest 

In this forest subtype, the bamboos D. patellaris and N. dulloa are mixed with broadleaf trees, such as 

Ormosia spp., Peltophorum dasyrrachis, Litsea spp., Michelia spp., Endospermum chinense, Grewia spp., 

Trema orientalis and Allospondias lakonensis. In some areas of this forest subtype, broadleaf tree species 

with significant timber value occur, including Chukrasia tabularis Mischocarpus spp. and Michelia spp. 

Mixed bamboo and broadleaf evergreen forest can be divided into two categories: 

• Mixed broadleaf and Dendrocalamus forest 720 ha (3.05%) 

• Mixed broadleaf and Neohouzeana forest 1,525 ha (6.46%) 

Due to the high density of bamboo, light penetration to the ground layer is low. Therefore, regeneration 

of tree species is generally poor: seedling density is usually less than 1,500 stems/ha. The ground layer 

is almost entirely devoid of grasses, lianas, palms and shrubs. Among the few species of herbaceous 

plants present are Phrynium spp., Alocasia macrorrhiza and Zingiber zerumbet, which are distributed 

along rivers and streams. 

Subtype: c) Secondary Broadleaf Evergreen Forest 

This forest subtype develops on abandoned agricultural land. The tree flora is comprised of fast-growing, 

light-demanding trees such as Symplocos spp., Syzygium spp., Litsea spp., Cinnamomum spp., Macaranga 

13


spp., Sapium spp. and Trema orientalis. 

This forest subtype often has only a single layer, with a canopy cover of around 80%. Both average tree 

diameter and tree height vary according to the stage of regeneration. In general, average tree diameter is 

below 10 cm and tree height is 6 to 7 m, although, in some places, tree height is only 3 m. No regeneration 

is occurring under the canopy layer. If left undisturbed, areas of secondary forest will eventually regenerate 

into low montane broadleaf evergreen forest. 

Subtype: d) Grassland and Scrub 

As a result of repeated clearance and cultivation of hill fields, many areas of grassland and scrub have 

developed. In general, the vegetation in these areas comprises grass and herbaceous plants, interspersed with 

shrubs. Common grass species include Erianthus arundinaceus, Thysanolaena maxima and Imperata cylindrica; 

herbaceous plants include Cassia tora and Eupatorium odoratum; whilst common shrubs include Triumfetta 

pseudocana and Helicteres angustifolia. There is no regeneration of trees in these areas. This vegetation subtype 

occurs around rivers, streams and villages with a total area of 4,690 ha (19.9% of the study area). 

14 

2.10 Mammals 

Various methods were used to identify mammal species in the forest. These included direct observation, 

observation of tracks and interviews with local hunters. Thirty eight mammal species belonging to six 

orders and 16 families were recorded in the study area. Bats and small mammals were not studied 

during the field survey, however, studies of these groups would reveal a large number of additional 

species for the area. 

Of the 38 mammal species recorded, 10 (26% of the total) are globally threatened (IUCN 1996) (Table 

8). Of these species, nine are listed as Vulnerable and only one, Tiger Panthera tigris, is listed as 

Endangered. A further three species, Phayre’s Leaf Monkey Semnopithecus phayrei, White-cheeked Gibbon 

Hylobates leucogenys and Sun Bear Ursus malayanus, are listed as Data Deficient but the continued 

survival of these species is almost certainly threatened. 

Mammal Records 

Roosevelt’s Muntjac Muntiacus rooseveltorum. A skull of a male muntjak was collected from a specimen 

which had been burned. The specimen was caught by Mr Lang Van Hoa, on 8 November 1998, in 

forest in the upstream area of the Ken River (19 0 59 ‘ N 104 0 59 ’ E). The maximum weight of this species 

is reported to be about 15 kg and the fur is dark brown. Information from local people suggests that 

this animal lives in closed evergreen forest and has a diet of leaves and fruits. During the study period, 

several more animals were trapped at elevations between 900 and 1,400 m. Preliminary analysis of the 

skull by Rob Timmins and Le Trong Trai identified the specimen as Roosevelt’s Muntjac; however, 

further analysis is required to confirm this determination. This species was first collected at Muong Yo, 

Laos, in 1929, and is known only from the holotype which is kept at the Field Museum of Natural 

History (Osgood 1932). If confirmed, the record from Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve would be 

the first for 69 years and the first record of this species in Vietnam. 

Gaur Bos gaurus. Information from local people indicates that there are 15 to 20 Gaur in an area of 

forest near the old Ban Liem hamlet, close to the border with Nghe An province, of which three were 

reported to have been killed by hunters in 1997. During the field survey, many old footprints were 

observed but only one new footprint was noted: in the high mountains between Bat Mot and Xuan 

Lien communes. In 1998, a number of local people observed a group of five Gaur in the upstream area 

of the Nam Pong River. It seems that the distribution of Gaur in the study area includes forest areas 

near Ban Vin, Luc and Duc villages, although the population is fragmented into small groups due to 

hunting.


Table 8: Globally Threatened Mammals Recorded in the Study Area 

Species Scientific Name Current Status 

as per IUCN 1996 

Primates: Primates: 

Lorises Loridae 

1. Lesser Slow Loris N. pygmaeus VU 

Old-world monkeys Cercopithecidae 

2. Assamese Macaque Macaca assamensis VU 

3. Bear Macaque M. arctoides VU 

Carnivores: Carnivora: 

Dogs and Foxes Canidae 

4. Indian Wild Dog or Dhole Cuon alpinus VU 

Bears Ursidae 

5. Asiatic Black Bear Ursus thibetanus VU 

Cats Felidae 

6. Clouded Leopard Pardofelis nebulosa VU 

7. Tiger Panthera tigris EN 

Even-toed Ungulates: Artiodactyla: 

Cattle, Antelopes, Goats Bovidae 

8. Gaur Bos gaurus VU 

9. Southern Serow Naemorhedus sumatraensis VU 

Rodents: Rodentia: 

Old-world Porcupines Hystricidae 

10. Malayan Porcupine Hystrix brachyura VU 

Follows Corbet and Hill (1992). Notes: EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable as per IUCN (1996). 

Tiger. During the field survey, no traces of Tiger were found. However, hunters reported two Tigers 

being shot in the Hon Yen and Hon Lech stream areas two years ago. During September and October 

1998, a group of hunters observed Tiger footprints around traps set for smaller mammals. 

Asiatic Black Bear Ursus thibetanus. Skins of Asiatic Black Bear and a captive animal were observed at 

Liem village in the upstream area of the Ken River. Information from local people indicates that a 

population is present in the study area. On 3 November 1998, a member of the survey team observed 

an Asiatic Black Bear on Bu Cho mountain (19°53’34"N 105°10’52"E, 1,563 m). 

Sun Bear. Although no Sun Bear skins were observed, the presence of this species in the area was 

confirmed in interviews with hunters. Reportedly, Sun Bears account for only about 10% of the total 

number of bears trapped each year. 

White-cheeked Gibbon. The call of White-cheeked Gibbon was heard in medium to high montane 

mixed coniferous and broadleaf evergreen forest in the Hon Lech stream and Ken River areas. 

Assamese Macaque Macaca assamensis. Two Assamese Macaques were observed at border army station 

505 and one at Ban Vin village. Macaque calls were heard many times during the field survey but the 

species could not be identified and could have been M. mulatta, M. assamensis or M. arctoides. 

Rhesus Macaque Macaca mulatta. A specimen of a male Rhesus Macaque was obtained by hunters in 

the upstream area of the Ken River. According to local people, this species is widespread and common. 

Southern Serow Naemorhedus sumatraensis. Tracks and droppings were observed during the field survey, 

15


although only one specimen was obtained from local hunters. The species requires rocky, montane 

forest habitat, which is widespread in the area. 

2.11 Birds 

The field survey recorded 134 bird species belonging to 12 orders and 30 families in the study area. Of 

the 134 bird species recorded, two are listed as globally threatened (Collar et al. 1994) (Table 9). 

Two endemic bird species were recorded during the field survey: Short-tailed Scimitar Babbler Jabouilleia 

danjoui and Red-vented Barbet Megalaima lagrandieri, which are endemic to Vietnam and Laos. 

Table 9: Endemic and Globally Threatened Bird Species Recorded in the Study Area 

Species Scientific Name Endemic Current Status as per 

Species Collar et al. 1994 

Megalaimidae 

1. Red-vented Barbet Megalaima lagrandieri EL 

Sylviidae 

2. Short-tailed Scimitar Babbler Jabouilleia danjoui EL VU 

3. Short-tailed Parrotbill Paradoxornis davidianus VU 

Follows Inskipp et al. (1996). 

Notes: VU = Vulnerable as per Collar et al. (1994). EL = Endemic to Vietnam and Laos. 

Bird Records 

Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis. A group of three Great Hornbills was observed along the Ken River. 

The bill of a female Great Hornbill, caught in the upstream area of the Ken River, was seen in a hunter’s 

house. 

Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli. Foraging birds of this species were seen and heard at the foot of Ta 

Leo mountain (19 o 51’53"N 105 o 11’32'’E). Many specimens of tail and wings were found in hunters’ 

houses in Ban Vin village. 

Habitat Distribution of Bird and Mammal Species 

The composition of the bird and mammal communities varies according to habitat type: 

16 

(a) Pure Bamboo Forest. The diversity of both mammal and bird species in this habitat is low. 

The only common mammals are squirrels and other rodents. Common birds include 

White-headed Babbler Gampsorhynchus rufulus, Short-tailed Parrotbill Paradoxornis 

davidianus, Striped Tit-babbler Macronous gularis and several species of woodpecker 

(Picidae). Pale-headed Woodpecker Gecinulus grantia is one of the few bird species restricted 

to this habitat type. 

(b) Mixed Bamboo and Broadleaf Evergreen Forest. Several civet species are found in this 

habitat, including Binturong Arctictis binturong, Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata and 

Common Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermapharoditus. Common bird species include Brown 

Hornbill, Red-whiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus, Black-throated Laughingthrush 

Garrulax chinensis, Blue-winged Leafbird Chloropsis cochinchinensis and several species of 

woodpecker and drongo (Dicrurus spp.). 

(c) Primary Forest. This habitat supports the greatest diversity of mammals and birds. Mammals 

found in this habitat type include Gaur, Asiatic Black Bear, Sun Bear, White-cheeked


Gibbon, Bear Macaque Macaca arctoides, Assamese Macaque, Tiger, Clouded Leopard 

Pardofelis nebulosa, Southern Serow and several species of muntjac. Bird species of 

conservation significance include Great Hornbill, Brown Hornbill and Blue-rumped Pitta 

Pitta soror. Several species of babbler (Garrulacinae and Timaliini) are restricted to forest 

at high elevations, including Grey Laughingthrush Garrulax maesi. This habitat supports 

approximately 80% of the bird and mammal species in the study area. 

Exploitation of Mammals and Birds 

Hunting and trapping of wildlife is common in the area of Ban Vin village, Bat Mot commune. Most 

families have guns for hunting. These are usually either 12 or 20 mm calibre, or occasionally homemade 

guns with one barrel of different diameters used to shoot large game or birds. Trapping of animals 

was very common in Ban Vin village until five years ago. Presently, there are eight groups involved in 

trapping. Each group consists of five to eight people and lays about 200 traps. Results of trapping by 

hunters of Ban Vin village between September and early November provided the following data: 14 

Asiatic Black Bear, three Sun Bear, five Southern Serow and 11 Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak. All 

trapped animal species, except bears, are used for food. Bears are sold to traders at a price of VND2 to 

5 million per animal. 

Illegal hunting threatens populations of large mammals and birds in the area. Unless effective management 

and protection measures are taken by the relevant authorities, the bird and mammal resources of the 

area will be depleted in the near future. 

2.12 Herpetiles 

Species Composition Fifty three species of reptiles and amphibians were recorded in the study area 

during the field survey. These include 34 species of reptile, in three orders and 14 families, and 19 

species of amphibian, in one order and five families. 

Recent research has shown the range of several species present in the nature reserve area is larger than 

previously thought. Lygosoma quadrupes, for example, was formerly considered to be restricted to Hanoi 

and Ca Mau but has now been observed at an elevation of 1,000 m on Bu Cho mountain, Xuan My 

commune. 

The species composition of reptile and amphibian populations in the study area is similar to that in 

western areas of Nghe An province, Vu Quang Nature Reserve, and Cuc Phuong, Ben En and Ba Vi 

National Parks. In comparison to Tam Dao National Park, the reptile and amphibian communities in 

the study area are less diverse, with fewer orders, families and species. 

At the national level, the herpetofauna of the study area includes 57.6% of the families known from 

Vietnam and 15.6% of the species. However, more detailed surveys covering a broader range of habitat 

types are likely to identify additional species in the area. 

Threatened Species. The field survey 

recorded a single herpetile species, 

Manouria impressa, listed as globally 

threatened (IUCN 1996). 

Endemism. During the field survey, 

one species of herpetile endemic to 

Table 10: Endemic and Globally Threatened Herpetiles 

Recorded in the Study Area 

Species Endemic Species Current Status as per 

IUCN 1996 

Manouria impressa VU 

Rana microlineata EV 

Follows Nguyen Van Sang and Ho Thu Cuc (1996). 

Notes: VU = Vulnerable as per IUCN (1996); EV = Endemic to Vietnam. 

17


Vietnam was recorded: Rana microlineata. 

Distribution of Herpetiles. Herpetile 

species are distributed unevenly within the 

study area. Thirty six species (68% of the 

total) occur in medium to high montane 

mixed coniferous and broadleaf evergreen 

forest. These areas are less affected by 

human habitation. Twenty species were 

restricted to these areas and not found 

elsewhere (Table 11). At high elevations, 

close to mountain peaks, the number of 

species is noticeably lower. The number of 

species is also lower in inhabited areas, 

where 22 species were recorded (42% of 

the total); including 12 that were restricted 

to these areas (Table 11). Amphibians were 

concentrated near water, with 14 out of a 

total of 19 species being collected in or 

alongside forest streams. 

18 

2.13 Butterflies 

Table 11: Herpetile Species with Restricted Habitat 

Distributions 

Restricted to Montane Restricted to Inhabited 

Forest Areas 

Gekko gecko Hemidactylus frenatus 

Physignathus cocincinus Mabuya multifasciata 

Takydromus wolteri Amphiesma stolata 

Varanus salvator Ptyas korros 

Python molutus Elaphe radiata 

Ampiesma parallela Xenochrophis piscator 

Trimeresurus albolabris Enhydris plumbea 

Platysternum megacephalum Bufo melanostictus 

Cistoclemmys galbinifons Ooeidozyga lima 

Geoemyda spengleri Rana guentheri 

Manouria impressa R. rugulosa 

Palea steindachneri Rhacophorus leucomystax 

Leptobrachium hasselti 

Bufo galeatus 

Phynoglossus laevis 

Rana andersoni 

R. kuhlii 

R. microlineata 

R. ricketti 

R. sauteri 

Species Composition. A total of 143 

butterfly species in nine families were 

recorded during the field survey (Appendix 5). Table 12 summarises the distribution and composition 

of the butterfly species recorded in the study area. Of the 143 species recorded, 68 were observed in 

grassland and scrub at elevations between 150 and 300 m; of these, species in the Hesperiidae were the 

most abundant, accounting for 34% of the total number. Fifty species were found in secondary forest 

habitats and 40 species were found along rivers and streams. Only 22 species were recorded in bamboo 

forest (at elevations of 300 to 400 m). Of these species, members of the Satyridae accounted for 36% 

and included Lethe syrcis, L. mekara, Ethope noirei and Mycalesis zonata. Sixteen species were found in 

undisturbed primary forest at an elevation of 1,200 m. 

Most butterfly species recorded in the study area occur at low elevations. Many species found at moderate 

Table 12: Distribution of Butterfly Species with respect to Habitat Type 

Family Number of Species Habitat Type 

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 

Papilionidae 15 9 0 7 7 0 

Pieridae 9 4 0 3 7 1 

Danaidae 8 6 2 1 4 2 

Satyridae 22 6 8 16 0 2 

Amathusiidae 6 1 1 3 1 2 

Nymphalidae 28 12 3 7 15 2 

Riodinidae 4 1 0 3 0 2 

Lycaenidae 19 6 2 7 6 2 

Hesperiidae 32 23 6 3 5 3 

Total 143 68 22 50 45 16 

Habitat Types: H1 = Grassland and scrub (150 to 300 m); H2 = Bamboo forest (300 to 400 m); H3 = Secondary 

forest (400 to 900 m); H4 = Streams and rivers (300 to 400 m); H5 = Primary forest (1,200 to 1,500 m)


elevations were also present in lower areas. These species included Euploea mulciber, Faunis eumeus, 

Notocrypta feistamelii, Paralaxita dora, Yasoda tripunctata and Abisara neophron. Some species were found 

only above 1,200 m: Ragadia crisilda, Thaumantis diores, Bassarona iva and Parantica sita. The distributions 

of most of the species recorded are restricted to the Indochinese peninsular and East Asia (Appendix 5). 

Eighty five species (59% of the total) have a distribution restricted to East Asia. Twenty eight species 

(20%) have a distribution restricted to the Indochina sub-region and the distribution of 14 species 

(10%) is restricted to northern Indochina. Eleven species have a distribution restricted to the tropical 

region of Indo-Australia. 

Endemic Species. Ten species found in the study area are endemic to Vietnam. These species belong 

mainly to the Satyridae and Amathusiidae and include Neorina patria, Lethe syrcis, L. naga, Mycalesis 

misenus and Enispe euthymius sychaeus. Celaenorrinhus vietnamicus is a recently described species 

(Devyatkin 1997) endemic to Vietnam, which is also known from Pu Mat Nature Reserve and Cuc 

Phuong National Park 

New Species. The field survey recorded a new species in the Satyridae, Ypthima sp. nov. (Monastyrskii 

in prep.). The first specimen of this species was collected at Pu Mat Nature Reserve with a later specimen 

collected at Ben En National Park. During the field survey, three specimens were observed, one of 

which was collected. This species occurs in bamboo forest or secondary forest habitats at low elevations 

(300 to 400 m). 

New Distribution Records. The survey found six species which had not previously been recorded in 

either central Vietnam or Vietnam as a whole. Jamides virgulatus and Celaenorrhinus inaequalis represent 

new records for Vietnam. Four species in the Hesperiidae (Iton semamora, Scobura phiditia, Matapa 

cresta and Halpe frontieri) had not been recorded in central Vietnam previously, only in northern Vietnam 

(Evans 1949, Devyatkin and Monastyrskii in press). 

In addition to these new records, Unkana ambassa was recorded during the field survey. This species 

was first recorded in Vietnam in 1998, and the specimen from Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is 

only the second record. The species is yet to be described and is not included in inventories of the 

butterfly fauna of Vietnam. 

Endangered Species. During the field survey, no nationally or globally threatened species of butterfly 

were recorded. However, Rhinopalpa polynice is a relatively rare species in Vietnam, with recent records 

from Ben En National Park and Pu Mat Nature Reserve. In Laos, Thailand and the Malay peninsular, 

this species is also considered rare. 

2.14 Socio-Cultural Features 

Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve includes all or part of six communes in Thuong Xuan district; an 

additional three communes are included in the buffer zone. The total population of the proposed 

nature reserve is 600 households, comprising 200 households in Xuan Lien commune and 400 households 

in Xuan My commune. The Thanh Hoa Provincial People’s Committee propose to build a dam in 

Xuan My commune to supply water for irrigation and hydro-electricity. The water level of the resulting 

artificial lake will rise to 100 m above sea level, flooding approximately 7,000 ha, including approximately 

1,716 ha within the proposed nature reserve. As a result of this, cultivated land will be inundated and 

residents will be forced to relocate to new areas under a programme organised by Thanh Hoa province. 

Consequently, the nature reserve will not include any human settlements in the future. 

19


Demographics 

The socio-economic survey was based upon population census data and statistics from the administration 

of each commune. According to 1997 data, there are 34,298 people in 5,849 households in Thuong 

Xuan district. The average household consists of six people in two or three generations. However, some 

households contain more than 10 people in three or four generations. 

Population Density. The average population density in the area is 45 people/km 2 . However, the 

population is unevenly distributed between and within the different communes. People are usually 

concentrated in or near the district town and along roads, while the population is very sparse in high 

mountainous areas. Specifically, the population density in the nine communes in the nature reserve and 

the buffer zone is: 

20 

• Less than 20 inhabitants/km 2 in Bat Mot and Xuan Lien communes. 

• 20 to 40 inhabitants/km 2 in Yen Nhan, Xuan My and Xuan Le communes. 

• 40 to 100 inhabitants/km 2 in Xuan Khao and Van Xuan communes. 

• 100 to 150 inhabitants/km 2 in Luong Son and Xuan Cam communes. 

Population Growth Rate. The population growth rate for the whole area is high (2.8%), compared to 

the average national growth rate (2.3%). The reasons for the high growth rate are low levels of education 

and lack of effective family planning, particularly in remote areas. Household surveys showed that each 

couple has, on average, four to five children, with some couples having up to 10 children. 

Ethnic Composition. Although several different ethnic groups live in the area, the Thai form the 

overwhelming majority (99.8%) of the population. Other, smaller groups include the Kinh, Tay and 

H’mong, although some of these smaller groups can be considered to have effectively merged with the 

main group. Villages are usually located near water sources and fertile land, suitable for cultivation and 

animal husbandry. 

Economic Activities 

Agricultural Practices. In recent years, fixed cultivation has expanded, with a corresponding decrease 

in shifting cultivation. Agriculture has also diversified from rice production and now includes cultivation 

of subsidiary crops and short-rotation industrial crops. Total food production is 7,624 tonnes/year of 

which rice accounts for 5,115 tonnes/year. Crop production, in both absolute and per capita terms, is 

increasing each year due to investment in new technologies, fertiliser and irrigation. However, food 

production varies year by year due to the following reasons: 

• Only one variety of rice is grown. 

• Crop yield is dependent on climatic conditions because irrigation is not developed sufficiently 

and there are only low fertiliser inputs. 

• Rice is mainly cultivated in hill fields and yields are very low (0.7 to 0.8 tonnes/ha/year). 

• Agricultural pests regularly damage rice crops and, in some years, may completely destroy 

the crop, as occurred in Duc and Kheo villages, Bat Mot commune in 1998. 

The area for production of subsidiary crops, such as maize, cassava and peanuts, varies from year to 

year. The yield for these crops varies between years but is generally low. 

Although most households practice wet (paddy) rice cultivation, some households still practise shifting 

cultivation. Policies promoting fixed cultivation have been implemented since 1980. More recently, 

households living in mountainous areas, including parts of Bat Mot, Yen Nhan, Xuan Lien, Xuan Le 

and Xuan Khao communes, have been resettled to lower areas. Small-scale irrigation systems are required


for conversion to fixed cultivation but these systems are frequently damaged or destroyed by annual 

floods. 

Forestry. Thuong Xuan forest enterprise is based in the district. Its functions are logging and establishment 

of plantations. At present, trees in existing plantations are too small to log and unavailable for production 

or trade. Fifty thousand hectares of forest land have been allocated by the forest enterprise to individual 

households. 

There are large areas of barren land and areas affected by shifting agriculture suitable for forestry activities. 

However, limited understanding of forestry activities among local people has created difficulties in 

developing plantations, protecting forest and allocating forest land. Because of relatively low levels of 

education, local people engaged in forestry activities do not see the relevance of forestry policies. This 

issue should be considered when establishing a system of forest conservation and social forestry 

programmes in the area. 

Infrastructure 

Transport and Communication. The communication network in the area is poorly and unevenly 

developed. It is concentrated mainly in the eastern sections around the Cao and Chu Rivers. The area 

is accessible only in the dry season; during the rainy season, travel within the district is very difficult. 

The poor road system is a major constraint on economic development as it restricts the transport of 

goods. Very few main roads exist in the area, and the development of new roads and the repair and 

upgrading of existing roads have been very limited. The 70 km stretch of road between the district town 

and the border with Laos is in very poor condition and impassable during the rainy season when 

bridges and causeways are washed out. Many communes and villages are only accessible on foot along 

steep paths; most transportation of goods is along these trails. 

Irrigation and Hydro-electricity. The district has many weirs and small-scale irrigation systems to 

service rice fields. These include dams on the Ruong, Hon, Poong, Keu and Tu streams. Many areas 

have potential for small-scale hydro-electricity generation. However, significant investment is required 

to develop such hydro-electricity stations. At present, households are supplied by small electric generators 

from China, Thailand and Singapore with capacities of 300, 500 or 1,000 W per generator. Electricity 

is mainly used for lighting and operating radios. The area can receive television and radio broadcasts. 

Education. Statistical data from 1997 supplied by Thuong Xuan district indicated that the total number 

of pupils in the area is 7,956. These students are served by 20 primary schools (grades I and II) with 304 

classes. These schools are staffed by 396 teachers, 20% of whom are female. Whilst infrastructure for 

schools has been improved, funding remains limited. However, most people are literate. 

Health Care. District statistical data indicate that the district has nine health stations, 20 doctors and 

23 nurses. On average, there is one member of health staff for every 2,000 people and there is one bed 

for every 1,000 people. Local health facilities are developing slowly: local health stations lack medical 

facilities and medicines. Patients with serious medical problems can only be treated at the district 

health station or at the hospital in Thanh Hoa city. 

Several health programmes have been implemented in the area. These include programmes to improve 

child nutrition, prevent diseases in new-born babies, provide clean water to rural areas and promote 

family planning. However, these programmes have had limited success, particularly in remote areas 

where people still face many difficulties. To improve the health of the community, more consideration 

needs to be paid to the construction of health care facilities and the training of doctors and nurses to 

serve the local villagers. The cost of medicines should be subsidised and health care should be free to 

21

3. Evaluation 

3.1 Criteria for Evaluating the Proposed Nature Reserve 

In order to evaluate the overall importance of a site, it is useful to compare the site against a set of criteria for 

assessing a protected area’s conservation value. The study area satisfies some but not all of the criteria identified 

Table 13: Conservation Criteria and Evaluation of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 

Conservation Criteria Site Evaluation 

22 

Size: 

The area must be of a size and form sufficient to 

support ecological units or viable populations of flora 

and fauna. As a rule, conservation importance increases 

with protected-area size. 

Richness and Diversity: 

Usually linked with the diversity of habitat types; 

ecological gradients or ecotones should be represented 

because they support transitional communities. 

Naturalness: 

Assessment of the extent of primary habitats. 

Rarity: 

The primary purpose of many protected areas is to 

protect rare and endangered species and habitats. 

Rarity may be a result of special habitat requirements, 

direct human pressure or indirect human influences. 

Uniqueness: 

Areas which exhibit particular natural processes or 

which are poorly represented in the national protection 

system. 

Typicalness: 

It is important to represent typical areas of common 

habitats and typical communities of a biome. 

Fragility: 

A measure of an area’s susceptibility to change through 

either natural or man-made processes. 

Position as an Ecological Unit: 

To establish the area’s position in an ecological unit, it 

is important to determine how or whether an area is 

linked to other areas of natural or semi-natural 

habitats. 

Economic Value: 

An area may protect a valuable water catchment or a 

higher level of biogeographic subdivision. 

Conservation Opportunity: 

Socio-political climate is highly determinate in the 

success of any conservation area’s future objectives and 

priorities. 

The study area covers 23,610 ha and may not be large 

enough to support viable populations of certain large 

mammal species unless forest corridors to adjacent 

protected areas supporting suitable habitat are 

maintained. 

The study area has moderate levels of biodiversity 

relative to other protected areas in northern and central 

Vietnam. An altitudinal gradient exists between 50 

and 1,600 m. 

The natural vegetation of the study area has been 

heavily disturbed by human activities and only 10% 

of the original primary forest remains. 

The study area protects 19 globally threatened species. 

Four plant and five vertebrate species are endemic to 

Vietnam or to Vietnam and Laos. The study area 

supports only two bird species listed as globally 

threatened. 

Roosevelt’s Muntjac is known globally only from the 

study area and one other site in Laos. 

The study area contains representative examples of 

sub-montane dry evergreen forest and lowland semievergreen 

rainforest, the two most widespread natural 

habitat types in Vietnam. 

22% of the study area is covered by regenerating forest. 

To the south, the study area is contiguous with Pu 

Hoat proposed nature reserve, forming a combined 

conservation area of 90,841 ha. 

The study area protects the water catchment of the 

Chu River and the planned Cua Dat dam. 

The proposed nature reserve has good political support 

at the provincial level. Following the construction of 

Cua Dat dam, there will be no human settlements in 

the study area.

Section 3 - Evaluation 

by Ratcliffe (1977) (Table 13) and should, therefore, be considered to be of low conservation value. 

3.2 Evaluation of Biological Factors 

Biodiversity 

The initial field survey of Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve was relatively brief and took place during October 

and November when conditions are unfavourable for biodiversity surveys due to various factors, including the 

low number of butterflies, the difficulty in identifying plants that are not in flower and the difficulty in recording 

forest birds that are not singing. However, known levels of biodiversity, although not as high as for certain 

protected areas in northern and central Vietnam, are comparable to those of several nearby protected areas. 

The study area is known to contain 560 species of vascular plants. The composition of the flora of Xuan Lien 

proposed nature reserve is likely to be distinct from that in certain nearby protected areas, such as Pu Hu 

proposed nature reserve, Ben En National Park and Ke Go Nature Reserve because, unlike these sites, Xuan Lien 

contains about 5,000 ha of forest at elevations between 800 and 1,600 m. In addition, comparison of the known 

plant species diversity of different protected areas shows that Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is comparable to 

other protected areas in central Vietnam (Table 14). 

Table 14: Comparison of Plant Diversity in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve with other Protected 

Areas in Central Vietnam (Ranked) 

Protected Area Area (ha) Families Genera Species 

1. Pu Hoat Proposed Nature Reserve 67,231 124 427 763 

2. Ben En National Park 16,643 135 453 737 

3. Pu Huong Nature Reserve 50,075 117 342 612 

4. Phong Dien and Dakrong Proposed Nature Reserves 69,474 118 366 597 

5. Ke Go Nature Reserve 24,801 117 367 567 

6. Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 23,610 124 381 560 

7. Pu Luong Proposed Nature Reserve 17,662 148 389 552 

8. Pu Hu Proposed Nature Reserve 15,595 102 324 509 

9. Bach Ma National Park 22,031 124 351 501 

10. Vu Quang Nature Reserve 55,630 111 275 328 

A total of 223 vertebrate species were recorded during the field survey, comprising 38 mammal, 131 bird and 53 

herpetile species. Whilst the overall known vertebrate species diversity of Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is 

lower than that of other nearby protected areas (Table 15), Xuan Lien supports a population of Roosevelt’s 

Muntjac, which is not known from any other site in Vietnam. 

Table 15: Comparison of Vertebrate Diversity of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve with other Protected 

Areas in Central Vietnam (Ranked) 

Protected Area Mammals Birds Reptiles Amphibians Total 

1. Vu Quang Nature Reserve 95 254 37 25 411 

2. Phong Nha Nature Reserve 65 269 51 22 407 

3. Ke Go Nature Reserve 46 270 30 17 363 

4. Ben En National Park 61 194 39 21 315 

5. Cuc Phuong National Park 64 137 36 17 254 

6. Phong Dien and Dakrong Proposed NRs 44 173 19 6 242 

7. Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 38 131 34 19 222 

8. Bach Ma National Park 55 158 — — 213 

At least in part, the low levels of known vertebrate species diversity reflect the small amount of survey effort 

expended in Xuan Lien relative to certain other protected areas, for instance Cuc Phuong National Park. For 

example, no research has yet been conducted into small mammals and bats, thus, the number of mammal species 

23


has certainly been under-recorded. Therefore, it is not apparent at this stage whether or not low levels of known 

biodiversity reflect a lower underlying level of biodiversity. However, it is clear that, with further study, the 

known conservation value of the proposed nature reserve is likely to increase. 

Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve contains 57% of the orders, 58% of the families and 16% of the species of 

herpetile known for Vietnam. The herpetile diversity of Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is comparable to that 

of several other protected areas in northern and central Vietnam (Table 16). Only at Tam Dao National Park is 

the number of herpetile species significantly greater than at Xuan Lien. Once again, this probably reflects the 

greater amount of survey effort expended at Tam Dao. 

24 

Table 16: Comparison of Herpetile Diversity of Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve with other Areas in 

Northern and Central Vietnam (Ranked) 

Area Area (ha) Orders Families Species 

1. Tam Dao National Park 19,000 6 21 103 

2. Vu Quang Nature Reserve 55,630 4 19 62 

3. Ba Vi National Park 7,000 4 16 62 

4. Ben En National Park 16,643 4 20 60 

5. Western Nghe An Province — 4 19 56 

6. Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 23,610 4 19 53 

7. Cuc Phuong National Park 25,000 4 17 53 

The autumn butterfly fauna in northern and central Vietnam is characteristically diverse. The species diversity of 

some families, such as the Pieridae, Papilionidae and Amathusiidae, varies between spring and autumn. For 

example, observations at Ba Be National Park have shown a similar number of species in spring (April) and 

autumn (November): 193 and 196, respectively. However, fluctuations in species diversity occurred within individual 

families. For example, 22 Papilionidae species were recorded in spring and only nine species were recorded 

in autumn. In contrast, more species of Nymphalidae were recorded in November (Monastyrskii et al. 1998). 

Therefore, Cwhen = 

comparing butterfly communities at different sites, only data for the autumn period (Septem- 

s 

ber to November) was used. The degree of similarity of between sites was measured using Sorenson’s Similarity 

Index (Magurran 1988). The index, C , is given by the formula: 

S 

__2j__ Where: j = The shared species of two areas 

(a + b) a = Number of species in area A 

b = Number of species in area B 

High values of C S indicate a high degree of similarity between the assemblages at a pair of sites. Comparisons 

between different protected areas in northern and central Vietnam have been completed under each family and 

for all butterfly communities (Table 17). 

Table 17: Sorenson’s Similarity Index (CS) comparing Butterfly Species Composition in Xuan 

Lien Proposed Nature Reserve with those in other Protected Areas in Northern and Central 

Vietnam 

Xuan Lien Vu Quang Pu Mat Ben En Cuc Phuong Ba Be Hoang Lien 

All Species 0.544 0.500 0.484 0.463 0.439 0.264 

Papilionidae 0.687 0.636 0.667 0.488 0.500 0.228 

Pieridae 0.583 0.438 0.352 0.387 0.432 0.275 

Danaidae 0.571 0.640 0.667 0.571 0.608 0.666 

Nymphalidae 0.579 0.515 0.560 0.523 0.423 0.363 

Satyridae 0.558 0.626 0.353 0.512 0.533 0.117 

Amathusiidae 0.769 0.750 0.200 0.833 0.715 0.200 

Riodinidae 0.800 0.545 0.400 0.600 0.444 0.545 

Lycaenidae 0.509 0.358 0.235 0.343 0.400 0.250 

Hesperiidae 0.286 0.353 0.400 0.395 0.319 0.038

Habitat 

The proposed nature reserve encompasses 23,610 ha, of which 18,522 ha (78%) is covered by forest. Of this, 

however, only 2,243 ha is undisturbed primary forest, whilst 16,279 ha is secondary forest of various types, 

including bamboo forest. Studies of the vegetation cover of Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve show that most 

forest at low elevations has been altered by human activity and that most remaining primary forest is distributed 

at elevations greater than 700 m. Areas of undisturbed habitat are of critical importance for a range of species 

sensitive to habitat change, particularly large mammals, hornbills and pheasants. 

Endangered Species 

Of the 560 species of plant recorded 

in the study area, six species are globally 

threatened (IUCN 1997). This 

represents only 1% of the species recorded 

in the study area. Ten globally 

threatened mammal species (IUCN 

1996) were recorded in the study 

area, representing 26% of the total 

number of species. Furthermore, a 

single herpetile species, Manouria 

impressa, is globally threatened 

(IUCN 1996) (Table 18). 


Table 18: Number of Nationally and Globally Threatened 

Species in the Study Area 

Group Total No. Globally % of Total 

of Threatened Species Globally 

Species Species Threatened 

Mammals 38 10 26 

Birds 134 2 6 

Herpetiles 53 1 28 

Butterflies 143 0 0 

Plants 560 6 4 

Total 928 19 6 

As per IUCN (1996 and 1997) and Collar et al. (1994). 

Table 19: Distribution of Threatened and Near-threatened Bird Species in Protected Areas in 

Thanh Hoa and Nghe An Provinces 

Species Thanh Hoa Province Nghe An Province 

Xuan Cuc Pu Pu Ben Pu Pu Pu 

Lien Phuong Luong Hu En Mat Hoat Huong 

Vulnerable 

Chestnut-necklaced Partridge * 

Red-collared Woodpecker * 

Blyth’s Kingfisher * * 

Short-tailed Scimitar Babbler * * * 

Short-tailed Parrotbill * * 

Near-threatened 

Brown Hornbill * * * * * * * * 

Yellow-vented Green Pigeon * 

White-bellied Green Pigeon * 

Grey-headed Fish Eagle * 

Pied Falconet * * 

Blue-rumped Pitta * * * * * 

Bar-bellied Pitta * * 

White-winged Magpie * * * * * 

Indochinese Green Magpie * * * * * * 

Green Cochoa * 

Grey Laughingthrush * * 

Rufous-throated Fulvetta * * 

Total 9 11 3 2 6 4 5 5 

Out of the total of 134 species of birds recorded in the study area, two species, Short-tailed Parrotbill and Shorttailed 

Scimitar Babbler, are listed as globally threatened (Collar et al. 1994). No species listed as either globally 

Endangered or Critically Endangered were recorded in the study area, although this may be partially due to 

25


limitations of the field survey. 

The conservation value of the proposed nature reserve with respect to avifauna can be seen clearly by comparing 

the number of globally threatened and Near-threatened bird species in protected areas in Thanh Hoa and Nghe 

An provinces (Table 19). By this measure, Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve is second only to Cuc Phuong 

National Park which does not lie wholly within Thanh Hoa province and, as previously mentioned, has been 

studied in greater detail. 

One reason why a larger number of globally threatened and Near-threatened species are known from Xuan Lien 

may be that it is the only site in Thanh Hoa province which contains evergreen forest above 800 m; Short-tailed 

Parrotbill, Green Cochoa Cochoa viridis and Grey Laughingthrush are all restricted to forest above c.600 m 

(King et al. 1975). Additionally, the number of threatened and Near-threatened species at Pu Hoat, Pu Luong 

and Pu Hu may be under-recorded due to limitations of previous surveys of these areas in terms of time and 

expertise. 

Endemism 

As mentioned previously, four endemic plant species (Cinnamomum balansae, Colona poilanei, Croton boniana 

and Macaranga balansae) were recorded in the study area. Animal species endemic to Vietnam or to Vietnam and 

Laos include two mammal species (Roosevelt’s Muntjac and White-cheeked Gibbon), two bird species (Shorttailed 

Scimitar Babbler and Red-vented Barbet), one herpetile species (Rana microlineata) and 10 butterfly 

species. 

26 

3.3 Evaluation of Economic Factors 

Watershed Protection 

The forest cover of the study area plays an important role in protection of watershed areas, protection of water 

resources, prevention of soil erosion and, especially, provision of wildlife habitat. The forest cover of the proposed 

nature reserve protects the catchment of the Chu River, which will supply the proposed Cua Dat irrigation 

and hydro-electricity dam. Cua Dat dam will regulate the flow of water to hundreds of thousands of hectares of 

rice fields of Thanh Hoa province. The water level of the proposed artificial lake will rise to 100 m above sea 

level, and the inundated area will include areas of agricultural land in Xuan My and Xuan Lien communes; only 

small areas of forest within the proposed nature reserve will be inundated. 

Soil Conservation 

Most of the forest ecosystems in the region occur on steep hills and mountains where soil is readily eroded if the 

forest cover is disturbed. Moreover, irrigation and hydro-electricity projects depend upon preservation of forest 

cover in order to avoid soil erosion and resulting siltation. A long-term forest and biodiversity conservation 

strategy should be prepared for the nature reserve to ensure adequate protection of soil and forest cover. 

Forestry Resources 

Xuan Lien proposed nature reserve contains the valuable timber species Fokienia hodginsii. Areas of mixed coniferous 

and broadleaf evergreen forest containing this species only cover a small fraction of the area of the proposed 

nature reserve, often in remote, inaccessible locations, making the commercial exploitation of this species unprofitable. 

However, the high value of this species and low income levels of local people mean that selective 

logging of even the most remote areas is economically viable for local people. Therefore, specific conservation 

measures should be implemented to prevent over-exploitation of this globally threatened species (IUCN 1997). 

Medicinal and Ornamental Plants 

One hundred and sixteen plant species with known medicinal uses were recorded during the field survey. These 

species already have a high value to local people, either through personal use or trade, however, there is potential 

for developing commercial production of traditional plant-based medicines, either through sustainable exploitation 

of medicinal plants in the forest or through cultivation of selected species.


Tourism 

Due to the inaccessibility of the area and the lack of infrastructure, there is currently little potential for the 

development of tourism in the area of whatever form. In the future, with improvements in infrastructure, most 

importantly roads, the area may have some potential for certain kinds of niche-tourism, such as ecotourism. 

However, the absence of significant, easily observable populations of large mammals render the area of little 

interest to ecotourists. 

3.4 Evaluation of Socio-economic Factors 

Population and Social Conditions 

The socio-economic data collected during the field survey indicate that the upstream areas of the Cao and Chu 

Rivers have considerable potential for agriculture. Valleys in these areas are favourable for food crops, industrial 

trees, fruit trees and agroforestry. 

The education level of the population remains low, with old customs and habits prevailing. Although wet rice 

cultivation is traditionally practised, some people still practice shifting cultivation which has significantly degraded 

forest areas, leading to a preponderance of secondary forest types such as bamboo forest. Illegal timber 

extraction continues to deplete the forest and cause soil erosion. Hunting and trapping of wildlife by local people 

has depleted populations of many animal species in the area and threatens to significantly reduce the biodiversity 

of the area. 

The area has a surplus of labour due to slow economic development. Labour distribution is simple, with most 

workers involved in agriculture. The technical knowledge of the labour force is low, resulting in low agricultural 

productivity and periods of food shortage. The rural economy is centred on subsistence agriculture, as developments 

in agricultural and forestry technologies have taken place slowly. 

Industrial facilities have not been developed and are unlikely to provide a boost to the economy in the foreseeable 

future because the population is scattered and production is small-scale. Trade in commodities and consumer 

goods takes place in the towns and lowland areas. In remote areas, supplies of essential goods do not meet 

local demand. State forest enterprises have existed for many years in the region. However, their capacity for 

promoting and supporting social forestry activities is yet to be fully assessed, and the rate of transfer of forestry 

technology remains low. 

Infrastructure 

Road transportation is very restricted due to the poor condition of roads and trails in the area. Roads are frequently 

made impassable in the rainy season by floods, landslides and fallen trees. Access to communes and 

villages is generally along trails which are only passable on foot. 

Health care, education and information dissemination facilities have in general improved in the area. Every 

commune has a school and a clinic, however, materials and supplies for them are often inadequate, out-dated 

and inappropriate for local conditions. 

27

4. Management Considerations 

4.1 Physical Factors 

Topography. The topography of the proposed nature reserve is deeply dissected by a number of stream and 

rivers, which flow into the Cao River in the north and into the Khue River in the south (both are tributaries of 

the Chu River). Such steep topography creates difficulties for constructing the infrastructure necessary for a 

protected area, such as guard stations, and for carrying out management activities, such as enforcement of forest 

rules and regulations. Adequate planning of both the location and type of infrastructure is required, and particular 

consideration should be given to the steep topography. 

Climate. The area has a tropical monsoon climate, with rainfall concentrated in the three months from July to 

September and the highest rainfall during August. Floods often occur at these times, causing obstacles to the 

management and protection of the nature reserve. The dry season is from November to April, and accounts for 

only 10% of the total annual rainfall. During the dry season, the area is exposed to hot, dry winds blowing from 

Laos. During this period, there is an increased risk of forest fire, caused by slash-and-burn agricultural practices. 

Consequently, the nature reserve management must implement measures to prevent and control forest fires, 

particularly in forest areas below 700 m. These measures should include raising awareness about the dangers of 

fire and establishing fire-prevention teams in each commune. 

4.2 Biological Factors 

Management of Forest Patches. The majority of mammals and birds in the proposed nature reserve depend 

upon evergreen forest. The only significant undisturbed areas of this habitat type occur above 700 m. The first 

priority in establishing and managing the nature reserve should be to protect and conserve existing primary 

forest patches in order to provide a refuge for species dependent upon evergreen forest. These species include 

Tiger, Clouded Leopard, Asiatic Black Bear, Roosevelt’s Muntjac, and White-cheeked Gibbon. 

Further Research. Although populations of several threatened and endemic mammal and bird species have been 

found in the proposed nature reserve, these populations have not been studied in sufficient detail to understand 

their distribution and ecology. The biodiversity data outlined in this report are only initial results and a more 

detailed research programme is essential in order to provide data for effective conservation management. Such a 

programme should include detailed surveys of mammal, bird, reptile and amphibian populations, with particular 

attention given to Roosevelt’s Muntjac and threatened species. Future biodiversity survey work should take place 

in the spring when conditions are most favourable. 

4.3 Socio-cultural Factors 

Hunting and Trapping. At present, there is insufficient information on the populations of nationally or globally 

threatened animal species to develop a long-term plan for their conservation. However, hunting and trapping of 

mammals and birds by villagers continues in Ban Vin village, and it will be necessary to take measures reduce and 

possibly eliminate the impact of these unlawful activities. These measures should include enforcement of regulations 

on the possession of firearms and patrols to check trap laying during the trapping season from September to 

March. 

Logging and Forest Clearance. Forest areas above 700 m have steep slopes and soils prone to erosion if the 

vegetation cover is removed. Once soil erosion has taken place, regeneration of the natural vegetation is impeded. 

The nature reserve management must seek to control forest clearance at higher elevations, in order to protect the 

integrity of the forest. Furthermore, it will be necessary to control logging and forest clearance along the Chu 

and Khao Rivers by local people from Hon Yen and Ban Vin villages if the catchments of these important water 

sources are to be protected. 

The conifers Fokienia hodginsii and Cunninghamia konishii have high economic value and, consequently, most 

28

Section 4 - Management Considerations 

of the trees with diameters greater than 30 cm have already been illegally felled; only small trees remain. In 

addition, broadleaf tree species, such as Michelia spp., are also illegally felled. Illegal timber extraction has already 

seriously degraded the forest in the proposed nature reserve; unless it is controlled, the few remaining areas of 

undisturbed forest will also be lost. 

The northern areas of the nature reserve are close to centres of population along the Cao River, and it is the 

activities of the inhabitants of this area that may be having the greatest impacts on the proposed nature reserve. 

Therefore, priority should be given to conservation activities in this area, such as establishing guard stations. 

29

5. Management Recommendations 

5.1 Management Objectives 

The following management recommendations for Xuan Lien Nature Reserve are based upon an appraisal of the 

biodiversity of the study area and an analysis of constraints on conservation. 

The general management objectives should be to: 

30 

(a) completely preserve the biodiversity value of the nature reserve; and 

(b) develop projects in the nature reserve and buffer zone, in order to encourage high levels of interest 

and involvement in conservation amongst local people. 

Specific objectives should include to: 

(a) strictly protect existing areas of primary forest within the nature reserve; 

(b) preserve populations of animal and plant species in the nature reserve together with their habitat, 

with particular attention to nationally and globally threatened species that are vulnerable to overexploitation, 

such as Fokienia hodginsii, Cunninghamia konishii, Tiger, Clouded Leopard, Gaur, 

White-cheeked Gibbon, Great Hornbill and Brown Hornbill; 

(c) protect the population of Roosevelt’s Muntjac which is currently under intense hunting pressure; 

(d) maintain the ecological value and hydrological functions of the Chu and Cao Rivers, and protect 

the catchment of Cua Dat dam; 

(e) initiate and carry out a research and monitoring programme to ensure the long-term protection of 

the natural values of the nature reserve; 

(f) support development of infrastructure and technology in the buffer area to facilitate socio-economic 

development with the aim of gradually reducing the dependence of local people on the natural 

resources of the nature reserve; and 

(g) conduct a programme to raise awareness amongst the local community of the value of the nature 

reserve and to promote sustainable use of its resources. 

5.2 Management Authority 

Inclusion of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve in Vietnam’s network of Special-use Forests would necessitate transfer of 

management responsibility to the Forest Protection Department (FPD) within MARD, which coordinates 

protection of all Special-use Forests whilst all other areas are managed by provincial FPDs (MOF 1991a). However, 

the management responsibility for and administration of nature reserves is undertaken, in most instances, at the 

provincial level, and it is recommended that this should be the case for Xuan Lien Nature Reserve. 

5.3 Proposed Boundary of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

Option One 

Beginning at Ta Leo peak (1,400 m) on the border with Nghe An province in the south-east of the nature 

reserve, the boundary runs between the watersheds of the Hon Yen and Hon Han streams until the confluence 

of the Chu and Cao Rivers. The boundary then continues north along the Cao River for 2.5 km, before heading 

west along the mountain ridge which incorporates the summits of Bu Pha Rang (580 m), Hon Han (655 m), Bu

31 

LEGEND 



District Border 

Commune Border 

Proposed Boundary: Option Two 

Proposed Boundary: Option One 

Road 

Stream or River 

800 m Contour Line 

Commune Centre 

Forest Protection Headquarters 

Guard Station 

Survey Site 

Border Army Station 

Dam 



Map 3: Proposed Boundary of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

SCALE: 1:140,000 


and Environment Centre of FIPI 

Section 5. - Management Recommendations

Section 5 - Management Recommendations 

Hon Han (1,208 m) and Ban Mua (1,100 m) mountains and peaks at 315 m, 1,178 m, 1,397 m and 1,442 m, 

as far as the provincial border. The southern boundary follows the border between Thanh Hoa and Nghe An 

provinces for about 26 km (Map 3). 

With this boundary, Xuan Lien Nature Reserve would have the following characteristics: 

32 

• A total area of about 16,500 ha, including 2,500 ha of evergreen forest. 

• No human settlements in the nature reserve after the construction of Cua Dat dam. 

However, under option one, an area of 7,100 ha south of the Cao River, including 2,000 ha of evergreen forest, 

would not be included in the nature reserve. Therefore, option two is proposed 1 . 

Option Two 

The southern and eastern boundary are the same as for option one. The northern boundary follows the Cao 

River and its tributary, the Ken River, from the border between Nghe An and Thanh Hoa provinces (19°59’N 

104°57’E) to the confluence with the Chu River (Map 3). 

With the boundary proposed under option two, the nature reserve would cover an area of 23,610 ha, an increase 

of 7,100 ha in comparison with option one. This increased area would enhance the conservation value of Xuan 

Lien Nature Reserve in the following ways: 

• Expanded habitat for large mammal species with populations in the area south of the Ken and Cao 

Rivers, such as Gaur, Tiger, Asiatic Black Bear, Sun Bear and Roosevelt’s Muntjac. 

• Expanded habitat of several nationally and globally threatened bird species. 

• More areas of forest in the watershed of Cua Dat dam are afforded Special-use Forest status. 

Neither option for the boundary of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve includes areas to the north-west adjacent to the 

national border between Vietnam and Laos for to the following reasons: 

• Local people in Bat Mot commune have settled the area north of the Ken River and are cultivating 

wet rice in the valleys and dry rice on the hills. This has led to exploitation or clearance of forest in 

this area. 

• Nam Xam Nature Reserve in Laos is about 12 km from the international border with Vietnam. 

The forest in the intervening areas has been extensively cleared by settlers practising shifting 

cultivation. The isolated and degraded patches of forest which remain do not represent a viable 

habitat corridor between Xuan Lien and Nam Xam Nature Reserves. 

Xuan Lien Nature Reserve will share a common boundary with Pu Hoat proposed nature reserve to the south in 

Nghe An province. 

As a result of future emigration of people from Xuan My and Xuan Lien communes, following the construction 

of Cua Dat dam, there will be no human settlement or fixed cultivation within the nature reserve under either 

option. Option two will provide greater protection of forest habitat and the biodiversity dependent upon it, as 

well as increased watershed protection. 

1 Following the publication of the original Vietnamese version of this report, a workshop was held in Thanh Hoa province 

in February 1999 attended by representatives of FIPI, the provincial people’s committee and the Provincial FPD to discuss 

the two options for the boundary at which option two was decided upon.

5.4 Management Areas 

Section 5. - Management Recommendations 

The core zone of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve should be divided into three areas, with each area having a different 

management regime: a Strict Protection Area, a Forest Rehabilitation Area and an Administration and Service 

Area. Additionally, there should be a buffer zone. 

Strict Protection Area 

The Strict Protection Area should be defined on the basis of the location of forest areas, which make up 78% of 

the nature reserve. This area should contain secondary forest types as well as primary forest. The areas to be 

included in the Strict Protection Area will be defined in detail in the investment plan for Xuan Lien Nature 

Reserve. 

Function of the Strict Protection Area. The function of the Strict Protection Area is to completely protect all 

habitats represented in the nature reserve and the animal and plant species they support. Activities which overexploit 

or degrade the forest should not be allowed. These activities include tree cutting, oil and resin exploitation, 

and hunting and trapping of animals. The management regime for the Strict Protection Area is shown in Table 

20. 

Table 20: Management Regime for the Strict Protection Area 

Activity Impacts Management 

Logging Degradation and loss of forest, disruption of Strictly prohibited 

forest canopy, loss of plant and animal species 

Charcoal production Degradation of forest, ecological disturbance, Strictly prohibited 

loss of habitat and species 

Resin tapping and oil distilling Destruction of forest, disruption of canopy Strictly prohibited 

layer, wildlife disturbance 

Hunting with guns Loss of mammal and bird species, wildlife Strictly prohibited 

disturbance 

Trapping mammals and birds Loss of mammal and bird species, wildlife Strictly prohibited 

with snares and traps disturbance 

Trapping large mammals with Loss of mammal species, wildlife disturbance Strictly prohibited 

explosives 

Fishing and frog catching Impacts unclear, over-exploitation may lead to Strictly prohibited 

loss of species 

Livestock grazing Disturbance to wildlife and ecology, prevention Strictly prohibited 

of natural regeneration 

Mining Destruction of forest, pollution, loss of aquatic Strictly prohibited 

species 

Fire Destruction of forest, prevention of natural Strictly prohibited 

regeneration 

Construction of roads, houses Creation of conditions for destruction of forest Strictly prohibited 

and other infrastructure and over-exploitation of natural resources 

Orchid collection Impacts unclear but can cause loss of plant species Strictly prohibited 

Medicinal plant collection Impacts unclear but can cause loss of plant species Limited 

Rattan collection Disturbance to the forest understorey, wildlife Limited 

disturbance 

Firewood collection Prevention of natural regeneration Limited to dead wood 

Honey collection Impacts unclear, possible risk of fire Permitted 

Forest Rehabilitation Area 

Most areas of scrub, grassland and agricultural land lie at low elevations. Large areas of these vegetation types will 

be inundated when Cua Dat dam is constructed. Consequently, the remaining areas of scrub and grassland in 

33

34 


the nature reserve will cover only 3,000 ha. Two options are proposed for these areas, either: 

(a) these areas will be protected and allowed to regenerate naturally into forest. The advantage of this 

approach is that areas of scrub and grassland are scattered throughout the nature reserve, making 

active rehabilitation difficult; or 

(b) these areas will be rehabilitated to forest habitat by planting indigenous tree species such as Manglietia 

spp., Erythrophleum fordii, Chukrasia tabularis, Fokienia hodginsii and Cunninghamia konishii. 

Function of the Forest Rehabilitation Area. The purpose of the Forest Rehabilitation Area is to restore the 

natural vegetation of areas which have been cleared and prevented from regenerating naturally by the activities of 

humans. This will be achieved through either natural regeneration of the forest or planting of indigenous trees. 

Activities which prevent forest regeneration are not permitted. The management regime for the Forest 

Rehabilitation Area is shown in Table 21. 

Table 21: Management Regime for the Forest Rehabilitation Area 

Activity Impacts Management 

Shifting cultivation Destruction of ecosystem, reduction of habitat Strictly prohibited 

for wildlife species 

Hunting and trapping Loss of animal species, decline in animal Strictly prohibited 

populations 

Mining Destruction of forest, pollution, loss of aquatic Strictly prohibited 

species 

Construction of roads, houses Creation of conditions for destruction of forest Strictly prohibited 

and other infrastructure and over-exploitation of natural resources 

Livestock grazing Disturbance to wildlife and ecology, prevention Strictly prohibited 

of natural regeneration 

Fire Destruction of forest, prevention of natural Strictly prohibited 

regeneration 

Planting of non-native tree Loss of habitat diversity and biodiversity Generally prohibited 

species 

Exploitation of non-timber Over-exploitation may result in loss of species Limited and regulated 

forest products and habitat 

Reforestation with indigenous Habitat expansion, maintenance of biodiversity, Encouraged 

tree species 

Protection of natural Forest rehabilitation and regeneration, habitat Encouraged 

regeneration expansion 

5.5 Buffer Zone 

The core zone of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve will cover 23,610 ha, including the whole of Xuan Lien commune 

and parts of five other communes Bat Mot, Yen Nhan, Xuan Khao, Xuan My and Van Xuan. The remaining 

areas of these five communes, along with three other communes (Luong Son, Xuan Cam and Xuan Le) will form 

a buffer zone. The total area of the buffer zone will be 53,556 ha. 

According to the plan for Cua Dat dam, all the inhabitants of Xuan Lien commune will be relocated, and this 

land will become part of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve. Socio-economic development projects for the buffer zone 

will be developed in the future, following and separate from the investment project for Xuan Lien Nature 

Reserve. Socio-economic development projects in the buffer zone will be managed by the local administration at 

commune, district and provincial level. Future conservation projects for the nature reserve will be integrated 

with community development projects for the buffer zone.

The buffer zone has the following advantages for development projects: 

Section 5. - Management Recommendations 

• The land is suitable for cultivating bamboo which can be sold to Thanh Hoa paper mill for use in 

paper production. 

• Sugarcane can be planted to supply Lam Son sugar factory in Thanh Hoa province. 

• The abundant labour force can be involved in forest protection and plantation activities as part of 

the nation-wide five-million-hectare forest planting programme. 

• There is sufficient grazing land available to support an increased number of livestock. 

5.6 Development of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

Investment Plan 

Establishment of the nature reserve will require the production of a 5 to 10 year investment plan. This investment 

plan should outline the infrastructure, manpower, management policy and investment capital required to ensure 

adequate protection of the natural resources of the nature reserve. This would include the staffing requirements 

for management, administration and forest protection. The plan should also outline the number and location of 

guard stations. 

Capital Construction Programme 

Headquarters. The proposed location of the nature reserve headquarters is to the east of the nature reserve in 

Luong Son commune, with coordinates 19°57’N 105°16’E (Map 3). 

Guard Stations. Assuming that option two for the nature reserve’s boundary is adopted, five guard stations will 

be required, positioned as follows: 

(a) Cua Dat Guard Station. Located near Cua Dat dam with coordinates 19°53’N 105°17’E. Its task 

will be to patrol and protect the forest in the east of the nature reserve. The main patrol route will 

be along the Chu River. 

(b) Xuan Lien Guard Station. Located on the border between Thanh Hoa and Nghe An provinces at 

the confluence of the Khue and Chu Rivers, with coordinates 19°55’N 105°08’E. Its task will be 

to patrol and check for forest clearance and hunting or trapping of animals in the area near the 

provincial border. 

(c) Yen Nhan Guard Station. Located near Due hamlet, Yen Nhan commune, with coordinates 20°00’N 

105°08’E. Its task will be to protect the forest on Bu Hon Han mountain and to monitor human 

activities in Yen Nhan and Bat Mot communes that affect the nature reserve. 

(d) Xuan Khao Guard Station. Located on the Cao River with coordinates 19°58’N 105°12’E. 

(e) Ban Vin Guard Station. Located in Ban Vin village, Bat Mot commune, with coordinates: 19°59’N 

104°59’E. Its task will be to carry out forest management and protection of forest south of the Ken 

River. The main patrol routes will be between Ban Vin and Lang Liem villages, and between Ban 

Vin and Ban Can villages. 

5.7 Future Plan for the Establishment of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve 

1. This feasibility study will be discussed at a forthcoming workshop to be held in Thanh Hoa province, 

which will be attended by representatives of all organisations concerned in the establishment and 

management of the nature reserve. The purpose of this workshop will be to obtain feedback on and 

35


36 

ratify the contents of this feasibility study 2 . 

2. After being ratified by the provincial people’s committee, this feasibility study will be submitted to 

the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD). Suggestions by senior experts 

regarding the development of the investment plan for Xuan Lien Nature Reserve will be solicited. 

3. In 1999, the government and MARD will agree to fund the development of an investment plan for 

the nature reserve 3 . 

4. The amount of investment capital required for projects in the core zone and buffer zone of the 

nature reserve detailed in the investment plan will be estimated. The investment plan will then be 

submitted to MARD and the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI) for ratification. 

5.8 Priority Actions 

1. Establishment of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve as part of Vietnam’s expanded system of Special-use 

Forests. This meets the commitment of the government to increase the protected area system of 

Vietnam to two million hectares by the year 2000. 

2. Thanh Hoa Provincial FPD should submit a proposal to MARD, outlining the funds required to 

develop an investment plan for Xuan Lien Nature Reserve. 

3. Thanh Hoa Provincial FPD should send official letters to the people’s committees of Thuong Xuan 

district and the communes therein to inform them of provincial and ministerial policy decisions 

regarding the establishment of Xuan Lien Nature Reserve. 

4. Thuong Xuan District FPD should step up control of illegal exploitation of natural resources in the 

area of the proposed nature reserve, particularly when these activities are taking place at unsustainable 

levels. The district FPD should also conduct education and awareness activities to increase 

understanding amongst local people of the importance of environment protection for agricultural 

development. 

5. Further study of animal and plant populations, particularly in the upstream areas of the Ken and 

Khue Rivers, should be carried out. Special attention should be paid to identifying threatened and 

endemic bird species which were not found during the previous field survey. Further information 

should be collected on the distribution and ecology of Roosevelt’s Muntjac and globally threatened 

mammals such as Tiger and Gaur. 

6. A detailed socio-economic survey should be carried out in communities in the buffer zone of the 

nature reserve. The results of this survey will be a basis for developing a harmonious relationship 

between the nature reserve and the local community. 

7. A thorough and professionally undertaken Environmental Impact Assessment should be undertaken 

prior to proceeding with the development of the Cua Dat dam. 

2 This workshop was held in February 1999 and the contents of the original Vietnamese version of this feasibility study were 

ratified. 

3 FIPI plan to write the investment plan for Xuan Lien Nature Reserve during the second half of 1999.

References 

Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J. and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to watch 2: the world checklist of threatened birds. 

Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International. 

Corbet, G. B. and Hill, J. E. (1992) The mammals of the Indomalayan Region. U.K.: Oxford University Press. 

Corbet, A. S., Pendlebury, H. M. and Eliot, J. N. 4th edition (1992) The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Kuala 

Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society. 

Dang Huy Huynh (1998) Division of geo-biological regions and the system of Special-use Forests in Vietnam. 

In: Vietnamese studies 3 (129): 109-120. Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers. 

Devyatkin, A. L. (1997) Hesperiidae of Vietnam 3. A new species of Calaenorrhinus Hübner, 1819, from Vietnam, 

with revisional notes on the C. aurivittata (Moore, 1879) group (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Neue 

Entomologische Nachrichten 41: 289-294. 

Devyatkin, A. L. and Monastryrskii, A. L. (in press) Hesperiidae of Vietnam, 5. An annotated list of the Hesperiidae 

of north and central Vietnam. Atalanta. 

Evans, W. H. (1949) A catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia and Australia in the British Museum (Natural 

History). London: Trustees of the British Natural History Museum. 

Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) Annotated checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, 

Bedfordshire, U.K.: Oriental Bird Club. 

IUCN (1996) 1996 Red list of threatened animals. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 

IUCN (1997) 1997 IUCN red list of threatened plants. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 

King, B., Woodcock, M. and Dickinson, E. C. (1975) Birds of South-East Asia. Hong Kong: Harper Collins. 

MacKinnon, J. and MacKinnon, K. (1986) Review of the protected areas system in the Indo-Malayan Realm. 

Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 

MacKinnon, J. (1996) Protected areas systems review of the Indo-Malayan Realm. Canterbury, U.K.: The Asian 

Bureau for Conservation (ABC) and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC). 

Magurran, A. E. (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. London: Chapman and Hall. 

MOF (1991a) Vietnam forestry sector review tropical forestry action programme: main report. Hanoi: Ministry of 

Forestry. 

MOF (1991b) Vietnam forestry sector review tropical forestry action programme: forest policy and legislation. Hanoi: 

Ministry of Forestry. 

Monastyrskii, A. L., Bui Xuan Phuong and Vu Van Lien (1998) Butterfly fauna of Ba Be National Park. Hanoi: 

Vietnam Russia Tropical Centre. 

Nguyen Van Sang and Ho Thu Cuc (1996) Checklist of reptiles and amphibians in Vietnam. Hanoi: Scientific and 

Technical Publishing House. (In Vietnamese.) 

Osgood, W. H. (1932) Mammals of the Kelley-Roosevelts and Delacour Asiatic expeditions. Publications Field 

Mus. Nat. Hist. 18: 193-339. 

37

References 

Pham Hoang Ho (1991) Cay Co Vietnam. Santa Ana, California: Mekong First. 

38 

Pham Ngoc Dang (1998) Urban environment and industrialisation in Vietnam. In: Vietnamese studies 3 (129): 

80-95. Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers. 

Pinratana, A. (1977-1988) Butterflies in Thailand. Volumes 1-6. Bangkok: Viratham Press. 

Ratcliffe, D. (1977) A nature conservation review. Vol. 1. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 

Thai Van Trung (1978) Forest vegetation of Vietnam. Hanoi: Science and Technology Publishing House (in 

Vietnamese). 

Vo Quy (1998) An overview of the environmental problems in Vietnam. In: Vietnamese studies 3 (129): 7-32. 

Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers. 

Wikramanayake, E. D., E. Dinerstein, P. Hedao and D. Olson (1997). A conservation assessment of terrestrial 

ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific Region. Washington D.C.: WWF-US Conservation Science Program.

Appendices 

Appendix 1: Flora Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 

Class, Family, Notes 

Genus and Species 

Lycopodiophyta 

Lycopodiaceae 

Lycopodiella cernua M 

Selaginellaceae 

Selaginella petelotii 

S. delicatula 

Polypodiophyta 

Angiopteridaceae 

Archangiopteris tonkinensis 

Angiopteris caudatiformis 

A. repandula 

Schizeaceae 

Lygodium conforme 

L. flexuosum 

L. japonicum 

Adiantaceae 

Adiantum capillus-veneris M 

Vittaria elongata 

Pteris ensiformis 

P. linearis 

Gleicheniaceae 

Dicranopteris dichotoma 

D. linearis 

Polypodiaceae 

Drynaria fortunei M 

Aglaomorpha coronans 

Pyrrosia lingua M 

Colysis bonii 

Cyatheaceae 

Cyathea contaminans 

C. gigantea 

Thyrsopteridaceae 

Cibotium barometz M 

Dennstaedtiaceae 

Pteridium aquilinum subsp. 

aquilinum 

Lindsaea ensifolia 

L. chienii 

Aspleniaceae 

Asplenium nidus O 

A. normale 

Diplazium esculentum 

Dryopteridaceae 

Tectaria decurrens 

Class, Family, Notes Class, Family, Notes 

T. leuzeana 

Davalliaceae 

Humata repens 

Davallia divarcata var. orientalis 

Blechnaceae 

Blechnum orientale 

Marsileaceae 

Marsilea quadrifolia M 

Pinophyta 

Gnetaceae 

Gnetum montanum 

Taxodiaceae 

Cunninghamia konishii W 

Cupressaceae 

Fokienia hodginsii W,M,R 

Podocarpaceae 

Dacrycarpus imbricatus W 

Podocarpus neriifolius W 

Amentotaxaceae 

Amentotaxus argotaenia W 

Magnoliophyta 

Magnoliopsida 

Magnoliaceae 

Manglietia conifera W 

M. hainanensis W 

M. fordiana W 

Michelia balansae W 

M. foveolata W 

M. hypolampra W 

Paramichelia baillonii W 

Tsoongiodendron odorum W 

Anonaceae 

Uvaria purpurea 

Desmos chinensis 

D. cochinchinensis M,O 

Dasymaschalon rostratum 

Polyalthia lauii W 

P. obtusa W 

Cyathocalyx annamensis W 

Alphonsea boniana W 

Mitrephora calcarea W 

Myristicaceae 

Knema conferta W 

K. globularia W,M 

Piperaceae 

Peperomia leptostachya 

Piper albispicum 

Illiciaceae 

Illicium parviflorum 

Ranunculaceae 

Clematis armandii 

C. buchaniana 

Menispermaceae 

Stephania japonica var. discolor M 

S. rotunda M 

Cissampelos pareira M 

Lauraceae 

Cinnamomum cassia W,M 

C. parthenoxylon W 

C. bejolghota 

(C. obtusifolium) W 

C. balansae W,EV 

Neocinnamomum lecomtei 

Litsea baviensis W 

L. cubeba W,M 

L. glutinosa W,M 

L. monopetala W 

L. robusta W 

L. verticillata W 

Neolitsea zeylanica W 

Lindera tonkinensis W 

Cryptocarya annamensis W 

C. lenticellata W 

C. metcalfiana W 

Beilshmiedia intermedia W 

B. percoriacea W 

Phoebe angustifolia var. annamensis 

P. tavoyana (P. cunneata) W 

Machilus bonii W 

M. macrophylla W 

Alseodaphne rhododendropsis W 

Caryodaphnopsis tonkinensis W 

Cassytha filiformis M 

Hernandiaceae 

Illigera parviflora 

Dilleniaceae 

Dillenia pentagyna W 

D. scabrella W 

D. turbinata W,M 

Tetracera scandens M 

39

40 

Appendices 


Actinidiaceae 

Saurauja tristyla M 

Theaceae 

Adinandra hainensis 

Eurya annamensis 

E. japonica 

Camellia dormoyana 

C. caudata 

Schima wallichii subsp. noronhae W 

Dipterocarpaceae 

Hopea mollisima W 

Parashorea chinensis W,R 

(Shorea chinensis) 

Vatica subglabra W 

Pentaphylaceae 

Pentaphylax euryoides 

(P. spicata) W 

Guttiferae 

Garcinia cochinchinensis 

(G. loureiri) W 

G. cowa W 

G. multiflora W 

G. oblongifolia W 

Cratoxylum cochinchinensis W,M 

C. formosum var. prunifolium W,M 

Elaeocarpaceae 

Elaeocarpus apiculatus W 

E. grandiflorus W 

E. griffithii (E. dubius, 

E. bachmaensis) W 

E. lanceifolius W 

E. limitanus W 

E. stipularis (E. thorelii, 

E. tomentosus) W 

Tiliaceae 

Grewia hirsuta W 

G. paniculata M 

Colona poilanei W,EV 

C. thorelii W 

Triumfetta pseudocana 

T. bartramia (T. rhomboidea) M 

Sterculiaceae 

Commersonia bartramia 

Helicteres angustifolia 

Pterospermum heterophyllum W 

P. lancaefolium W 

Reevesia thyrsoidea W 


Sterculia lanceolata W,M 

Heritiera macrophylla W 

Bombaceae 

Bombax ceiba W,M 

Malvaceae 

Sida rhombifolia M 

Urena lobata M 

Kydia calycina W 

Flacourtiaceae 

Hydnocarpus annamensis W 

H. kurzii W 

Scolopia chinensis W 

Passifloraceae 

Passiflora foetida M 

Cucurbitaceae 

Solena heterophylla 

Gymnopetalum cochinchinensis 

Hodgsonia macrocarpa M 

Datiscaceae 

Tetrameles nudiflora W,M 

Begoniaceae 

Begonia boisiana 

B. macrostoma 

Capparaceae 

Capparis tonkinensis 

Crateva nurvala M,O 

Ericaceae 

Rhododendron nuttalii O 

R. cavaleriei O 

Vaccinium dunalianum 

Lyonia ovalifolia 

Sapotaceae 

Madhuca pasquieri W,M,R 

Eberhardtia tonkinensis W 

Sinosideroxylon racemosum W 

Sarcosperma kachinense W 

Ebenaceae 

Diospyros apiculata 

(D. eriantha var. cocica) W 

D. kerrii W 

D. pilosula W 

Styracaceae 

Styrax benjoin W 

S. tonkinensis W,M 

Alniphyllum fortunei 

Symplocaceae 

Symplocos adenophylla W 

S. cochinchinensis subsp. laurina W 


S. paniculata (S. chinensis) W 

Myrsinaceae 

Maesa balansae M 

Embelia laeta M 

E. scandens 

Ardisia aciphylla 

A. maculosa 

A. ramondiaeformis 

A. silvestris M 

Amaranthaceae 

Cyathula prostrata 

Achyranthes aspera M 

Polygoniaceae 

Polygonum chinensis 

P. hydropiper M 

P. leptostachyum 

Rosaceae 

Eriobotrya bengalensis W 

Rhaphiolepis indica W 

Rubus cochinchinensis M 

R. parvifolius (R. triphyllus) 

R alceaefolius M 

Prunus arborea var. montana W 

Fabaceae 

Mimosoideae 

Entada phaseoloides 

(E. tonkinensis) 

Adenanthera pavonina W 

Albizia chinensis W 

A. odoratissima W 

A. lucidior W 

Archidendron clypearia W 

A. turgidum W 

A. bauchei W 

Caesalpiniodeae 

Peltophorum dasyrrachis var. W 

tonkinensis 

Caesalpinia sappan M 

C. mimosoides 

C. minax M 

Erythrophleum fordii W 

Cassia alata M 

C. hirsuta 

C. tora M 

Bauhinia touranensis 

B. godefroyi 

Saraca dives W


Papilionideae 

Ormosia balansae W 

O. fordiana W 

O. pinnata W 

Bowringia calicarpa 

Dalbergia rimosa 

D. rimosa var. tonkinensis W,V 

D. hupeana var. laccifera W 

D. balansae W 

D. stipulaceae W 

Milletia ichthyotona W 

Desmodium caudatum 

Erythrina variegata M 

Pueraria montana 

Crotalaria medicaginea 

C. umbellata 

Eleagnaceae 

Eleagnus bonii 

E. conferta 

Proteaceae 

Helicia cochinchinensis W 

Heliciopsis lobata W,M 

Lecythidaceae 

Barringtonia acutangula W,M 

Sonneratiaceae 

Duabanga grandiflora W 

Lythraceae 

Lagerstroemia tomentosa W 

Myrtaceae 

Rhodomyrtus tomentosa M 

Syzygium bonii W 

S. finetii 

S. hancei W 

S. mekongensis W 

S. sterrophyllum 

Melastomataceae 

Melastoma septemnervium 

(M. candidum) 

M. normale 

Osbeckia nepalensis 

Blastus cochinchinensis 

Memecylon fruticosum 

Combretaceae 

Terminalia myriocarpa W 

Quisqualis indica M 

Rhizophoraceae 

Carallia lancaefolia W 


Alangiaceae 

Alangium chinense W 

A. kurzii W 

Loranthaceae 

Helixanthera parasitica 

(Loranthus adpresus) 

Dendrophtoe pentandra 

(Loranthus pentandrus) 

Taxillus chinensis 

(Loranthus chinensis) 

Elythranthe albida 

Balanophoraceae 

Balanophora latisepala 

Celastraceae 

Glyptopetalum tonkinensis 

Euonymus acanthoxanthus 

E. pseudo-vagans 

Icacinaceae 

Gonocaryum lobbianum W 

Pandaceae 

Microdesmis casearifolia W 

Euphorbiaceae 

Phyllanthus emblica W 

P. reticulata M 

P. petelotii 

Glochidion hirsutum 

G. gamblei 

Breynia angustifolia 

B. fruticosa M 

Drypetes perreticulata W 

Aporusa dioica 

(A. microcalyx) 

Baccaurea ramiflora 

(B. sapida) W 

Antidesma yunnanensis W 

A. montanum W 

Bischofia javanica W,M 

Bridelia balansae 

B. minutiflora W 

Croton bonianus EV 

Claoxylon hainanensis 

Mallotus philippensis W 

M. barbatus 

M. apelta M 

M. paniculatus 

(M. cochinchinensis) W 

Alchornia tiliaefolia W 

Cleidion brevipetiolatum W 

Appendices 


Macaranga denticulata W 

M. balansae W,EV 

Homonoia riparia M 

Aleurites moluccana W 

Vernicia fordii W 

Endospermum chinense W 

Sapium baccatum W 

S. discolor W 

S. rotundifolium W 

Oxalidaceae 

Averrhoa carambola 

Oxalis corniculata M 

Sapindaceae 

Nephelium chryseum W 

Xerospermum donnaiense W 

Pometia pinnata W 

Arytera littoralis W 

Mischocarpus fucescens W 

M. sundaicus W 

Paviesia annamensis W 

Staphyleaceae 

Turpinia montana 

Aceraceae 

Acer erythranthum W 

A. tonkinensis subsp. tonkinensis W 

Burseraceae 

Canarium album W,M 

C. bengalense W 

C. tonkinensis W 

Anacardiaceae 

Mangifera foetida W 

Allospondias lakonensis W 

Choerospondias axillaris W,M 

Dracontomelon duperreanum W 

Rhus javanica var. roxburghii M 

(R. chinensis) 

Toxicodendron rhetsoides W 

Simaroubaceae 

Brucea tonkinensis 

Ailanthus triphysa W,M 

Meliaceae 

Chukrasia tabularis W 

Melia azedarach W 

Dysoxylum binectariferum W 

D. hainanense var. glaberrinum W 

D. tonkinense W 

Chisocheton paniculatus W 

Aphanamixis polystachya W 

41

Appendices 

42 

Class, Family, Notes Class, Family, Notes Class, Family, Notes 

Amoora dasyclada W 

Aglaia gigantea W 

A. roxburghiana W 

Heynia trijuga W 

Rutaceae 

Zanthoxylum armatum 

Z. avicenniae M 

Euodia lepta 

E. meliaefolia 

Acronychia pedunculata M 

Clausena dunniana M 

Luvunga sarmentosa 

Rhamnaceae 

Gouania leptostachya M 

Ventilago leiocarpa M 

Berchemia lineata M 

Leeaceae 

Leea rubra M 

Vitaceae 

Tetrastigma retinervium 

T. tonkinense 

Cissus rosea 

Cayratia trifolia 

C. japonica M 

Apiaceae 

Centella asiatica M 

Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides M 

Araliaceae 

Tupidanthus calyptratus 

Schefflera glomerulata 

S. leucantha 

S. brevipedicellata 

S. octophylla W,M 

Trevesia palmata M 

Diplopanax stachyanthus W 

Aralia armata M 

Heteropanax fragrans 

Platanaceae 

Platanus kurzii W 

Hamamelidaceae 

Symingtonia populnea W 

Mytilaria laosensis W 

Rhodoleia championii W 

Ulmaceae 

Gironniera subequalis W 

Celtis orientalis W 

Trema orientalis W 

Salicaceae 

Salix tetrasperma var. harmandii W 

S. tetrasperma var. nilagirica W 

Moraceae 

Streblus asper M 

Broussonetia papyrifera W,M 

Malaisia scandens 

Artocarpus styracifolius W 

A. lakoocha W 

Antiaris toxicaria var. toxicaria W,M 

Ficus altissima W 

F. stricta 

F. racemosa W 

F. subpyriformis 

F. trivia (F. glandulifera) W 

F. fulva 

F. pumila M 

F. heterophylla var. heterophylla M 

F. auriculata 

F. hispida var. hispida 

F. cunia 

F. gibbosa 

Urticaceae 

Poikilospermum suaveolens 

Dendrocnide sinuata 

Pilea baviensis var. serrata 

P. peltata 

Elatostema balansae 

Pellionia macroceras 

Boehmeria holosericea 

Pouzolzia pentandra 

Debregeasia squamata var. 

squamata 

Juglandaceae 

Pterocarya stenoptera var. W 

tonkinensis 

Engelhardtia roxburghiana W 

E. spicata var. spicata W 

Annamocarya sinensis W,R 

Fagaceae 

Castanopsis annamensis W 

C. clarkei var. pseudoindica W 

C. ferox W 

C. indica W 

C. tonkinensis W 

Lithocarpus dussaudii W 

L. finetii W 

L. fissa W 

L. laotica W 

L. paviei W 

L. tubulosus W 

Quercus bambusaefolia W 

Q. fleuryi W 

Q. petelotii W 

Betulaceae 

Betula alnoides W 

Loganiaceae 

Gelsemium elegans 

Strychnos wallichii M 

Apocynaceae 

Bousingonia mekongense 

Alstonia scholaris W,M 

Alyxia divaricata 

Tabernaemontana bovina M 

Wrightia macrocarpa 

W. pubescens subsp. lanati W 

Asclepidiaceae 

Cryptolepis buchananii 

Streptocaulon griffithii M 

Gymnema latifolia 

Hoya multiflora 

H. villosa 

Dischidia alboflava 

Solanaceae 

Solanum americanum 

S. torvum M 

Convolvulaceae 

Merremia scandens 

Ipomoea pes-tigridis 

I. bonii 

Boraginaceae 

Tournefortia sarmentosa 

Heliotropium indicum M 

Verbenaceae 

Callicarpa arborea W 

C. nudiflora 

Vitex quinata W 

V. trifolia W 

Gmelina arborea W 

Clerodendron cyrtophyllum M 

C. kaempferi 

Lamiaceae 

Ocimum gratissimum M 

Gomphostema lucidum 

Leonurus sibiricus M

Scrophulariaceae 

Paulownia fargesii W 

Lindernia ruellioides 

L. anagallis 

Acanthaceae 

Thunbergia coccinea 

Strobilanthes brunescens 

Justicia gendarussa M 

J. ventricosa 

Bignoniaceae 

Oroxylum indicum M 

Radermachera ignea 

Markhamia stipulata W 

Pentaphragmaceae 

Pentaphragma sinense 

Rubiaceae 

Hedyotis corymbosa M 

H. capitellata M 

H. auricularia 

Wendlandia glabrata 

W. paniculata 

Uncaria homomalla 

(U. tonkinensis) 

Neonauclea purpurea W 

(Nauclea purpurea) 

Neolamarckia cadamba W 

(Anthocephalus indicus) 

Haldina cordifolia 

(Nauclea cordifolia) W 

Mussaenda bonii 

M. dehiscens 

Aidia oxydonta 

(Randia oxydonta) W 

Randia acuminatissima W 

R. dasycarpa 

Gardenia sp. 

Canthium dicoccum var. W,M 

rostratum 

Ixora coccinea O,M 

Psychotria rubra M 

Lasianthus annamicus 

L. cyanocarpus var. asperulatus 

Caprifoliaceae 

Sambucus hookeri (S. javanica) 

Viburnum lutescens 

(V. colebrookeanum) 

Asteraceae 

Vernonia arborea var. javanica W 

Ageratum conyzoides M 

Eupatorium odoratum 

Thespis tonkinensis 

Blumea balsamifera M 

Xanthium inaequilaterum 

(X. strumarium) M 

Sigesbeckia orientalis M 

Eclipta prostrata (E. alba) M 

Artemesia vulgaris M 

Crepis japonica 

Crassocephalum crepidioides 

Liliopsida 

Pandanaceae 

Pandanus humilis 

P. tonkinensis 

Araceae 

Pothos grandis 

P. repens M 

Epipremnum giganteum O 

Raphidophora decursiva O 

Homalomena occulta 

(H. aromatica) M 

Colocasia gigantea 

(C. indica) 

Alocasia macrorrhiza M 

Amorphophallus interruptus 

Commelinaceae 

Commelina diffusa 

Floscopa glabratus 

Pollia hasskarlii 

Arecaceae 

Rhapis macrantha O 

Livistona chinensis O 

Caryota rumphiana O 

C. urens O 

Arenga pinnata O 

Pinanga duperreana O 

Calamus platyacanthus 

C. tetradactylus 

C. tonkinensis R 

Plectocomia elongata 

Musaceae 

Musa acuminata 

M. aff. coccinea O 

Zingiberaceae 

Costus speciosus M 

C. tonkinensis 

Amomum villosum M 

Appendices 

Class, Family, Notes Class, Family, Notes Class, Family, Notes 

Alpinia chinensis M 

Catimbium bracteatum 

Zingiber zerumbet M 

Marantaceae 

Phrynium dispermum 

P. parviflorum 

Liliaceae 

Dianella nemorosa 

Smilacaceae 

Smilax glabra M 

S. ovalifolia 

Cyperaceae 

Fimbristylis complanata 

F. umbellaris 

Cyperus pilosus M 

C. rotundus M 

C. compressus 

Carex indica 

C. cryptostachys 

Poaceae 

Arundinaria sat M 

A. sp 

Indosasa aff. crassiflora 

Bambusa sp. 

Gigantochloa levis 

Dendrocalamus membranaceus 

D. patellaris 

Melocalamus sp. 

Neohouzeana dulloa 

Centhotheca lappacea 

Phragmites vallatoria 

Thysanolaena maxima M 

Eleusine indica M 

Dactyloctenium aegyptiacum 

Cynodon dactylon 

Pennisetum alopecuroides 

Imperata cylindrica M 

Saccharum spontaneum M 

Erianthus arundinaceus 

Chrysopogon aciculatus M 

Themeda gigantea 

Coix puellarium 

Agavaceae 

Dracaena loureiri M 

Taccaceae 

Tacca chantieri 

Stemonaceae 

Stemona tuberosa M 

43

Appendices 



Dioscoreaceae 

Dioscorea persimilis M 

D. cirrhosa M 

Orchidaceae 

Paphiopedilum gratrixianum O 

Habenaria ciliolaris 

Anoectochilus roxburghii 

Arundina graminifolia O 

Oberonia ensiformis O 

Liparis elliptica O 

Dendrobium lindleyi O 

D. chrysotoxum O 

D. thyrsiflorum O 

D. anosmum O 

D. nobile O 

D. cretaceum O 

D. aloifolium O 

Eria muscicola 

E. globulifera O 

Bulbophyllum eberhardtii 

B. concinnum O 

Cymbidium dayanum M,O 

Aerides odorata O 

Renanthera coccinea O 

Follows Pham Hoang Ho (1991) 

Notes: EV = Endemic to Vietnam; 

M = Medicinal; W = Wood; O = Ornamental; 

V = Vulnerable; R = Rare as per IUCN (1997). 

44

Appendices 

Appendix 2: Mammals Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature 

Reserve Common Name Order, Family, Record IUCN 1996 


Pangolins: Pholidota: 

Pangolins Manidae 

1. Chinese Pangolin Manis pentadactyla S NT 

2. Sunda Pangolin M. javanica S NT 

Treeshrews: Scandentia: 

Treeshrews Tupaiidae 

3. Northern Treeshrew Tupaia belangeri S,O 

Primates: Primates: 

Lorises Loridae 

4. Slow Loris Nycticebus coucang S 

5. Lesser Slow Loris N. pygmaeus S VU 

Old-world monkeys Cercopithecidae 

6. Assamese Macaque Macaca assamensis S,O VU 

7. Rhesus Macaque M. mulatta S,O NT 

8. Bear Macaque M. arctoides S VU 

9. Phayre’s Leaf Monkey Semnopithecus phayrei S,I DD 

Gibbons Hylobatidae 

10.White-cheeked Gibbon Hylobates leucogenys H DD 

Carnivores: Carnivora: 

Dogs and Foxes Canidae 

11. Indian Wild Dog or Dhole Cuon alpinus I VU 

Bears Ursidae 

12. Asiatic Black Bear Ursus thibetanus S,O VU 

13. Sun Bear U. malayanus S,I DD 

Weasels, etc. Mustelidae 

14. Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula O 

15. Hog Badger Arctonyx collaris S 

16. Small-toothed Ferret-badger Melogale moschata S 

17. Otter Lutra sp. I 

Civets Viverridae 

18. Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha S 

19. Common Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus S 

20. Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata S 

21. Binturong Arctictis binturong S 

Mongooses Herpestidae 

22. Crab-eating Mongoose Herpestes urva S 

Cats Felidae 

23. Leopard Cat Prionailurus bengalensis I 

24. Golden Cat Catopuma temminckii I NT 

25. Clouded Leopard Pardofelis nebulosa I VU 

26. Tiger Panthera tigris I EN 

Even-toed ungulates: Artiodactyla: 

Pigs Suidae 

27. Wild Boar Sus scrofa S,T 

45

Appendices 

46 

Common Name Order, Family, 


Record IUCN 1996 

Deer Cervidae 

28. Sambar Cervus unicolor S,T 

29. Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak S,T 

30. Roosevelt’s Muntjac M. rooseveltorum S 

Cattle, antelopes, goats Bovidae 

31. Gaur Bos gaurus T,I VU 

32. Southern Serow Naemorhedus sumatraensis S VU 

Rodents: Rodentia: 

Non-flying squirrels Sciuridae 

33. Black Giant Squirrel Ratufa bicolor O 

34. Pallas’s Squirrel Callosciurus erythraeus O 

35. Cambodian Striped Squirrel Tamiops rodolphii O 

36. Red-cheeked Squirrel Dremomys rufigenis O 

Old-World Porcupines Hystricidae 

37. Malayan Porcupine Hystrix brachyura S VU 

38. Asiatic Brush-tailed Porcupine Atherurus macrourus S 

Follows Corbet and Hill (1992). 

Record: S = Specimen; O = Observed; T = Tracks; H = Heard; I = Interview. 

Status: EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near-threatened; DD = Data Deficient as per IUCN (1996).

Appendices 

Appendix 3: Birds Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature Reserve 

Common Name Order, Family, Endemic Species Collar et al. 1994 


Galliformes 

Phasianidae 

1. Bar-backed Partridge Arborophila brunneopectus 

2. Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus 

3. Silver Pheasant Lophura nycthemera 

4. Grey Peacock Pheasant Polyplectron bicalcaratum 

Piciformes 

Picidae 

5. Speckled Piculet Picumnus innominatus 

6. White-browed Piculet Sasia ochracea 

7. Grey-capped Pygmy Woodpecker Dendrocopus canicapillus 

8. Greater Yellownape Picus flavinucha 

9. Pale-headed Woodpecker Gecinulus grantia 

10. Bay Woodpecker Blythipicus pyrrhotis 

Megalaimidae 

11. Red-vented Barbet Megalaima lagrandieri EL 

12. Green-eared Barbet M. faiostricta 

13. Golden-throated Barbet M. franklinii 

Bucerotiformes 

Bucerotidae 

14. Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis 

15. Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli NT 

Trogoniformes 

Trogonidae 

16. Red-headed Trogon Harpactes erythrocephalus 

Coraciiformes 

Alcedinidae 

17. Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis 

Halcyonidae 

18. White-throated Kingfisher Halcyon smyrnensis 

Cuculiformes 

Cuculidae 

19. Large Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx sparverioides 

20. Indian Cuckoo Cuculus micropterus 

21. Drongo Cuckoo Surniculus lugubris 

22. Asian Koel Eudynamys scolopacea 

23. Green-billed Malkoha Phaenicophaeus tristis 

Centropodidae 

24. Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis 

25. Lesser Coucal C. bengalensis 

Apodiformes 

Apodidae 

26. Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis 

27. Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus 

47

Appendices 

48 



Strigiformes 

Strigidae 

Endemic Species Collar et al. 1994 

28. Mountain Scops Owl Otus spilocephalus 

29. Collared Scops Owl O. bakkamoena 

30. Brown Wood Owl Strix leptogrammica 

31. Collared Owlet Glaucidium brodiei 

Columbiformes 

Columbidae 

32. Oriental Turtle Dove Streptopelia orientalis 

33. Spotted Dove S. chinensis 

34. Red Collared Dove S. tranquebarica 

35. Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica 

36. Thick-billed Green Pigeon Treron curvirostra 

37. Mountain Imperial Pigeon Ducula badia 

Gruiformes 

Rallidae 

38. White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus 

Ciconiiformes 

Accipitridae 

39. Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela 

40. Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus 

41. Black Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis 

42. Mountain Hawk Eagle Spizaetus nipalensis 

Ardeidae 

43. Little Egret Egretta garzetta 

44. Little Heron Butorides striatus 

45. Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus 

46. Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus 

Passeriformes 

Pittidae 

47. Blue-rumped Pitta Pitta soror NT 

48. Rusty-naped Pitta P. oatesi 

Eurylaimidae 

49. Long-tailed Broadbill Psarisomus dalhousiae 

Irenidae 

50. Asian Fairy Bluebird Irena puella 

51. Blue-winged Leafbird Chloropsis cochinchinensis 

Laniidae 

52. Long-tailed Shrike Lanius schach 

Corvidae 

53. White-winged Magpie Urocissa whiteheadi NT 

54. Indochinese Green Magpie Cissa hypoleuca NT 

55. Grey Treepie Dendrocitta formosae 

56. Racket-tailed Treepie Crypsirina temia 

57. Ratchet-tailed Treepie Temnurus temnurus 

58. Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos 

59. Ashy Woodswallow Artamus fuscus 

60. Large Cuckooshrike Coracina macei 

61. Pied Triller Lalage nigra

Appendices 




62. Long-tailed Minivet Pericrocotus ethologus 

63. Scarlet Minivet P. flammeus 

64. White-throated Fantail Rhipidura albicollis 

65. Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus 

66. Ashy Drongo D. leucophaeus 

67. Crow-billed Drongo D. annectans 

68. Bronzed Drongo D. aeneus 

69. Greater Racket-tailed Drongo D. paradiseus 

70. Black-naped Monarch Hypothymis azurea 

71. Asian Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi 

72. Common Iora Aegithina tiphia 

73. Great Iora A. lafresnayei 

74. Large Woodshrike Tephrodornis gularis 

Muscicapidae 

75. Blue Whistling Thrush Myophonus caeruleus 

76. Siberian Thrush Zoothera sibirica 

77. Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis 

78. Oriental Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis 

79. Plumbeous Water Redstart Rhyacornis fuliginosus 

80. Slaty-backed Forktail Enicurus schistaceus 

81. Green Cochoa Cochoa viridis 

Sturnidae 

NT 

82. Black-collared Starling Sturnus nigricollis 

83. White-vented Myna Acridotheres cinereus 

84. Crested Myna A. cristatellus 

85. Hill Myna Gracula religiosa 

Sittidae 

86. Chestnut-bellied Nuthach Sitta castanea 

Paridae 

87. Sultan Tit Melanochlora sultanea 

Hirundonidae 

88. Red-rumped Swallow Hirundo daurica 

Pycnonotidae 

89. Black-crested Bulbul Pycnonotus melanicterus 

90. Red-whiskered Bulbul P. jocosus 

91. Ochraceus Bulbul Alophoixus ochraceus 

92. Ashy Bulbul Hemixos flavala 

93. Black Bulbul Hypsipetes leucocephalus 

Zosteropidae 

94. Oriental White-eye Zosterops palpebrosus 

Sylviidae 

95. Grey-bellied Tesia Tesia cyaniventer 

96. Asian Stubtail Urosphena squameiceps 

97. Common Tailorbird Orthotomus sutorius 

98. Dark-necked Tailorbird O. atrogularis 

99. Greenish Warbler Phylloscopus trochiloides 

100. Rufous-faced Warbler Abroscopus albogularis 

101. Yellow-bellied Warbler A. superciliaris 

102. White-crested Laughingthrush Garrulax leucolophus 

49

Appendices 




103. Lesser Necklaced Laughingthrush G. monileger 

104. Grey Laughingthrush G. maesi NT 

105. Black-throated Laughingthrush G. chinensis 

106. Buff-breasted Babbler Pellorneum tickelli 

107. Spot-throated Babbler P. albiventre 

108. Scaly-crowned Babbler Malacopteron cinereum 

109. Large Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus hypoleucos 

110. Streak-breasted Scimitar Babbler P. ruficollis 

111. Short-tailed Scimitar Babbler Jabouillea danjoui EL VU 

112. Streaked Wren Babbler Napothera brevicaudata 

113. Eyebrowed Wren Babbler N. epilepidota 

114. Rufous-capped Babbler Stachyris ruficeps 

115. Golden Babbler S. chrysaea 

116. Spot-necked Babbler S. striolata 

117. Striped Tit Babbler Macronous gularis 

118. White-browned Shrike Babbler Pteruthius flaviscapis 

119. White-hooded Babbler Gampsorhynchus rufulus 

120. Rufous-throated Fulvetta Alcippe rufogularis NT 

121. Mountain Fulvetta A. peracencis 

122. White-bellied Yuhina Yuhina zantholeuca 

123. Short-tailed Parrotbill Paradoxornis davidianus 

Nectariniidae 

VU 

124. Thick-billed Flowerpecker Dicaeum agile 

125. Plain Flowerpecker D. concolor 

126. Purple-naped Sunbird Hypogramma hypogrammicum 

127. Fork-tailed Sunbird Aethopyga christinae 

128. Crimson Sunbird A. siparaja 

129. Streaked Spiderhunter Arachnothera magna 

Passeridae 

130. Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus 

131. Forest Wagtail Dendronathus indicus 

132. White Wagtail Motacilla alba 

133. Yellow Wagtail M. flava 

134. White-rumped Munia 

Follows Inskipp et al. (1996). 

Lonchura striata 

Status: VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near-threatened as per Collar et al. (1994); EL = Endemic to Vietnam and Laos. 

50

Appendices 

Appendix 4: Herpetiles Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature 

Reserve 

No. Class, Order, Family Xuan My Bat Mot Endemic IUCN 

Genus and Species Commune Commune Species 1996 

Reptilia 

Squamata: 

Gekkonidae 

1 Gekko gecko O I 

2 Hemidactylus frenatus O O 

Agamidae 

3 Calotes emma S 

4 Physignathus cocincinus O 

Scincidae 

5 Eumeces sp. O 

6 Lygosoma quadrupes S 

7 Mabuya multifasciata S 

8 M. macularia S 

Lacertidae 

9 Takydromus sexlineatus O 

10 T. wolteri S 

Varanidae 

11 Varanus salvator O 

Xenopeltidae 

12 Xenopeltis unicolor I I 

Boidae 

13 Python molutus I I NT 

Colubridae 

14 Amphiesma stolata O 

15 A. parallela S 

16 Elaphe radiata I I 

17 Ptyas korros I O 

18 P. mucosus I 

19 Rhabdopsis subminiatus O O 

20 Xenochrophis piscator O O 

21 Ahaetulla prasina S 

22 Enhydris plumbea 

Elapidae 

23 Bungarus fasciatus I I 

24 B. multicinctus I I 

25 Naja naja I I 

26 Ophiophagus hannah I I 

Viperidae 

27 Trimeresurus albolabris I I 

Testudinata: 

Platysternidae 

28 Platysternum megacephalum I DD 

Emydidae 

29 Cistoclemmys galbinifrons I NT 

51

Appendices 

52 

No. Class, Order, Family Xuan My Bat Mot Endemic IUCN 

Genus and Species Commune Commune Species 1996 

30 Pyxidea mouhoti I I 

31 Geoemyda spengleri O 

Testudinidae 

32 Manouria impressa O VU 

Trionychidae 

33 Palea steindachneri I NT 

34 Pelodiscus sinensis I 

Amphibia 

Anura: 

Pelobatidae 

1 Leptobrachium hasselti O 

2 Megophrys minor (?) S 

Bufonidae 

3 Bufo galeatus I 

4 B. melanostictus O O 

Ranidae 

5 Ooeidozyga lima O 

6 Phrynoglossus laevis O 

7 Rana andersoni S I 

8 R. guentheri I I 

9 R. kuhlii S I 

10 R. limnocharis O O 

11 R. maosonensis S 

12 R. microlineata S I EV 

13 R. ricketti S 

14 R. rugulosa I I 

15 R. sauteri 

16 R. sp. S 

Rhacophoridae 

17 Rhacophorus leucomystax S O 

Microhylidae 

18 Kaloula pulchra O 

19 Microhyla butleri S 

Follows Nguyen Van Sang and Ho Thu Cuc (1996). 

Notes: VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near-threatened; DD = Data Deficient as per IUCN (1996). 

EV = Endemic to Vietnam. 

Data Source: S = Specimen; O = Observed; I = Interview

Appendices 

Appendix 5: Butterflies Recorded in Xuan Lien Proposed Nature 

Reserve 

No. Family, Genus and Species Range S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 

Papilionidae 

1. Troides aeacus Feld. 2 r 

2. Parides aidoneus Ddl. 2 r 

3. Chilasa clytia L. 3 r 

4. Papilio demoleus L. 4 c 

5. P. helenus L. 4 f 

6. P. alcmenor Westw. 2 r 

7. P. polytes L. 3 c 

8. P. protenor Cram. 2 r r 

9. P. memnon L. 3 f 

10. P. paris L. 3 f 

11. Graphium chironides Honr. 3 r 

12. G. sarpedon L. 4 c f 

13. G. agamemnon L. 4 f r r 

14. Lamproptera curius F. 3 c f r 

15. L. meges Zinken 3 c f r 

Pieridae 

16. Delias acalis Godart 2 r 

17. Prioneris thestylis Dbl. 2 f 

18. Talbotia naganum Moore 1 f 

19. Cepora nadina Lucas 3 r 

20. Appias lyncida Cram. 3 c 

21. Hebomoia glaucippe L. 3 f f f 

22. Eurema blanda Boisd. 3 c f f 

23. E. andersoni Moore 3 r r 

24. E. ada Dist. & Preyer 3 r r 

Danaidae 

25. Danaus genutia Cram. 4 f f 

26. Tirumala septentrionis Butl. 4 f r 

27. Parantica aglea Stoll. 2 c f 

28. P. sita Koll. 2 r 

29. Ideopsis vulgaris Butl. 3 f 

30. Euploea core Cram. 3 f f 

31. E. mulciber Cram. 3 f r 

32. E. radamanthus F. 3 f r 

Satyridae 

33. Melanitis leda L. 5 f f f 

34. Elymnias casiphone Fruhst. 3 r 

35. E. patna Westw. 3 r 

36. Lethe mekara Moore 3 f 

37. L. europa F. 3 f 

38. L. naga Doherty 3 r 

39. L. syrcis Hew. 1 c f 

40. Neorina patria Leech 1 r 

41. Ethope noirei Janet 1 c f 

42. Mycalesis inopia Fruhst. 1 r 

53

Appendices 

54 


43. M. perseoides Moore 3 r r 

44. M. misenus de Nicev. 1 r 

45. M. adamsoni Watson. 2 r 

46. M. deficiens Fruhst. 2 r 

47. M. zonata Matsumura 2 c c c 

48. M. anaxias Hew. 3 c c r 

49. Erites falcipennis W.-M. & de Nicev. 2 r 

50. Coelites nothis Westw. 2 r 

51. Ragadia crisilda Hew. 2 f 

52. Ypthima imitans Elw. & Edw. 1 c 

53. Y. baldus F. 3 c 

54. Y. sp. nov. 1 r r 

Amathusiidae 

55. Faunis canens Hubn. 2 f 

56. F. eumeus Drury 2 f c c 

57. Stichophthalma fruhstorferi Rob. 1 ? 

58. Thaumantis diores Dbl. 1 r 

59. Enispe euthymius sychaeus Brooks 1 r 

60. Discophora sondaica Boisduv. 3 f 

Nymphalidae 

61. Cethosia cyane Drury 2 r r r 

62. Cupha erymanthis Drury 4 r 

63. Vagrans egista Cram. 4 r 

64. Cirrochroa tyche Feld. 3 r 

65. Vindula erota F. 3 f 

66. Vanessa indica Herbst. 5 r 

67. Junonia atlites L. 3 c f 

68. J. almana L. 3 c f 

69. Rhinopalpa polynice Cram. 3 r 

70. Hypolimnas bolina L. 4 f r 

71. Cyrestis thyodamus Boisd. 3 f 

72. Chersonesia risa Dbl. 3 r r 

73. Neptis clinia Moore 3 f r 

74. N. nata Moore (?) 3 r 

75. N. hylas L. 4 f 

76. Pantoporia aurelia Staudinger 3 r 

77. P. hordonia Stoll. 3 r 

78. Athyma cama Moore 3 r 

79. A. selenophora Koll. 3 f 

80. Parthenos sylvia Cram. 4 f 

81. Tanaecia julii Lesson 3 f c r 

82. T. lepidea Butl. 3 f r 

83. Bassarona iva ? Moore 2 r r 

84. Eulacera osteria Westw. 3 f 

85. Charaxes aristogiton Feld. 2 r 

86. C. bernardus F. 3 c 

87. Polyura athamas Drury 3 f 

88. P. jalisus Feld. 3 r 

Riodinidae 

89. Zemeros flegyas Cram. 3 c

Appendices 


90. Abisara neophron Hew. 2 r f 

91. Paralaxita dora Fruhst. 1 r c 

92. Stiboges nymphidia Butl. 3 r 

Lycaenidae 

93. Miletus sp. ? r r 

94. Megisba malaya Horsf. 2 f 

95. Celatoxia marginata de Nicev. 3 r 

96. Udara dilecta Moore 3 f 

97. Jamides alecto Feld. 3 f 

98. J. virgulatus Druce 3 r 

99. Nacaduba kurava Moore 3 f 

100. Prosotas pia Toxipeus 3 f 

101. Pithecops corvus Fruhst. 3 r r 

102. Arhopala ammonides Doherty 2 r 

103. A. sp. 1 3? r 

104. A. sp. 2 3? r 

105. Spindasis syama Horsf. 3 c 

106. S. lohita Horsf. 3 f 

107. Yasoda tripunctata Hew. 2 f f 

108. Rapala pheretima Hew. 3 r 

109. Zeltus amasa Hew. 3 f 

110. Hypolycaena erylus Godart 3 f f 

111. Curetis bulis Westw. 3 r 

Hesperiidae 

112. Hasora badra Moore 3 f 

113. Badamia exclamationis F. 3 r 

114. Celaenorrhinus inaequalis Elw. & Edw. 2 r 

115. C. vietnamicus Dev. 1 f f 

116. Tagiades gana Moore 3 r 

117. T. menaka Moore 3 r 

118. Mooreana trichoneura Feld. 3 r r 

119. Astictopterus jama Feld. 3 r r 

120. Sebastonyma dolopia Hew. 2 r 

121. Suada swerga de Nicev. 3 f 

122. Halpe zola Evans 3 f f 

123. H. nephele Leech (cf. frontieri) 1 r 

124. Iambrix salsala Moore 3 c r 

125. Ancistroides nigrita Latreille 3 r 

126. Koruthaialos rubecula hector Wts. 3 r r 

127. K. sindu Feld. 3 r r 

128. Notocrypta curvifascia Feld. 3 f 

129. N. feistamelii Boisd. 3 f f 

130. N. paralysos W.-M. & de Nicev. 3 f 

131. Matapa cresta Evans 3 r 

132. M. druna Moore 3 r 

133. Scobura cephala Hew. 2 r 

134. S. phiditia Hew. 2 f 

135. S. woolletti Riley 3 f 

136. Erionota thrax L. 3 r 

137. Unkana ambassa Moore 2 r 

55

Appendices 

56 


138. Cephrenas acalle oceanica 3 f 

139. Telicota sp. 1 ? ? 

140. T. sp. 2 ? ? 

141. Parnara ganga Evans 3 r 

142. Baoris farri Moore 3 f 

143. Iton semamora Moore 3 f 

Global Range: 1 - East Himalayas (Nepal, Assam, Sikkim, N Burma, Yunnan, SW China, N Indochina); 

2 - Indochina to India; 

3 - Oriental region; 

4 - Indo-Australian tropics; 

5 - Cosmopolitan. 

Study Sites: S1 - Grassland and scrub 150 to 300 m a.s.l.; 

S2 - Pure bamboo forest 300 to 400 m a.s.l.; 

S3 - Regenerating forest 400 to 900 m a.s.l.; 

S4 - Rivers and streams 300 to 400 m a.s.l.; 

S5 - Primary forest 1,200 to 1,500 m a.s.l. 

Species occurrence is divided into three categories: 

r - rare (single or two specimens encountered); 

u - frequent (~10 specimens seen); 

c - common (up to 20 specimens seen).

BirdLife International is a global conservation federation with a worldwide network of Partner organizations, Representatives 

and committed individuals. 

BirdLife International seeks to conserve all bird species on earth and their habitats and, through this, it works for the world’s 

biological diversity. It recognizes that the problems affecting birds, their habitats and our global environment are linked 

inseparably with social, economic and cultural factors and that these can only be resolved if human societies function in an 

ecologically sustainable manner and if the needs, welfare and aspirations of people form a part of all conservation action. 

Birds provide BirdLife International with a uniquely valuable focus: they are sensitive indicators of biological richness and 

environmental trends and fulfil many key ecological functions; they contribute greatly to our understanding of natural processes; 

they are an important economic resource; and they have inspired and delighted people of many cultures for centuries, which 

makes them excellent ambassadors for the promotion of conservation awareness and international collaboration. 

BirdLife International pursues a programme of: 

* scientific research and analysis to identify and monitor worldwide the most threatened bird species and the most critical sites 

for the conservation of bird diversity; 

* advocacy and policy development to promote the conservation of birds and biodiversity through sustainability in the use of 

all natural resources; 

* field action and country conservation programmes, ranging from community-based land-use and management projects to 

species recovery programmes benefiting both wildlife and people; 

* network and capacity building to expand and strengthen the global partnership of conservation organizations and to promote 

worldwide interest in the conservation of birds and the wider environment. 

11 Lane 167, Tay Son, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam 

Tel: 844 851 7217 - Fax: 844 857 3866 

E-mail: birdlife@netnam.org.vn

A Feasibility Study for the Establishment of Xuan Lien Nature ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?