(HCVF) Toolkit for Malaysia - HCV Resource Network

High Conservation 

Value Forest (HCVF) 

Toolkit for Malaysia: 

A national guide for identifying, 

managing and monitoring High 

Conservation Value Forests 

© WWF-Malaysia / Nik Maseri 

First Edition 

October 2009 

WWF-Malaysia

High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) Toolkit for Malaysia 

October 2009 

Published October 2009 by WWF-Malaysia. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title 

and credit of the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. © 2009 WWFM. All rights reserved.

Contents 

Abbreviations 

Introduction 1 

1.1 Objective 1 

1.2 Background 1 

1.3 Overview of HCVF 1 

1.4 What is this toolkit? 3 

1.5 How to use this toolkit 3 

1.6 Other potential uses of the toolkit 4 

2 Toolkit Proper: Interpretation of HCVF in Malaysia 5 

HCV 1 Biodiversity Values 5 

HCV1.1 Protected Areas 5 

HCV1.2 Threatened and Endangered Species 6 

HCV1.3 Endemism 7 

HCV1.4 Critical Temporal Use 8 

HCV 2 Landscape-level Forest 9 

HCV 3 Ecosystems 10 

HCV 4 Services of Nature 12 

HCV 4.1 Watershed Protection 12 

HCV 4.2 Erosion Control 13 

HCV 4.3 Barriers to Destructive Fire 14 

HCV 5 Basic Needs of Local Communities 15 

HCV 6 Cultural Identity of Local Communities 16 

3 References 18 

Appendix 1. Threatened & endangered species of large mammal in Malaysia. 

Appendix 2. Selected localities with endemic tree or mammal species. 

Appendix 3. Management of HCV1 (Biodiversity Values - Wildlife). 

Appendix 4. List of Important Bird Areas (IBAs) for Malaysia. 

Appendix 5. Habitat preferences of Malaysian mammals by related groups. 

Appendix 6. PERHILITAN Ecosystem Assessment for Peninsular Malaysia. 

Appendix 7. Forest type classifications and assessments in Sabah. 

Appendix 8. Forest type classifications and assessments in Sarawak. 

Appendix 9. Guide to identifying forest areas fundamental to meeting basic needs of local communities 

(HCV 5) and/or critical to local communities’ traditional cultural identity (HCV 6). 

Appendix 10. How to implement the LOAM process. 

Appendix 11. Relevant organisations to contact. 

Appendix 12. List of participants in expert review 27-28 May 2008. 

Appendix 13. List of participants in stakeholder consultations. 

Appendix 14. Mammal Tracks of Thailand. 

ii 

-i-

Abbreviations 

CFS 

CITES 

CR 

DID 

DTCP 

DWNP 

EN 

EPU 

FDPM 

FDRS 

FMP 

FMU 

FRC 

FRIM 

FSC 

HCV 

HCVF 

IBA 

IUCN 

KDCA 

LAC 

LOAM 

MC&I(2002) 

MNS 

MTCC 

MTCS 

MMD 

NCS 

NFC 

NGO 

NRE 

NREB 

PACOS 

PERHILITAN 

PFE 

PM 

RIL 

SFC 

STA 

TPA 

UKM 

VU 

WCS 

WWF 

Central Forest Spine 

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora 

Critically Endangered 

Department of Irrigation and Drainage 

Department of Town and Country Planning 

Department of Wildlife and National Parks Malaysia (PERHILITAN) 

Endangered 

Economic Planning Unit 

Forest Department Peninsular Malaysia 

Fire Danger Rating System 

Forest Management Plan 

Forest Management Unit 

Forest Research Centre 

Forest Research Institute Malaysia 

Forest Stewardship Council 

High Conservation Value 

High Conservation Value Forest 

Important Bird Area 

International Union for Conservation of Nature 

Kadazandusun Cultural Association Sabah 

Limits of Acceptable Change 

Landscape Outcome Assessment Methodology 

Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification 

Malaysian Nature Society 

Malaysian Timber Certification Council 

Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme 

Malaysian Meteorological Department 

National Conservation Strategy 

National Forestry Council 

Non-Governmental Organisation 

Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment 

Natural Resources and Environment Board (Sarawak) 

Partners of Community Organisations 

Jabatan Perlindungan Hidupan Liar dan Taman Negara (DWNP) 

Permanent Forest Estate 

Peninsular Malaysia 

Reduced Impact Logging 

Sarawak Forestry Corporation 

Sarawak Timber Association 

Totally Protected Area (Sarawak) 

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 

Vulnerable 

Wildlife Conservation Society 

World Wide Fund for Nature 

-ii-

Introduction 

1.1 Objective 

The High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) Toolkit for Malaysia aims to provide an overview of the 

practical guidance available to forest managers and other stakeholders to identify, manage, and monitor 

HCVFs in Malaysia as specified by various national and international standards of forest management. 

In particular, the toolkit is intended to help forest managers comply with Principle 9 in both the Forest 

Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification 

[MC&I(2002)], the standard adopted by the National Steering Committee for the certification of natural 

1 

forests in Malaysia . 

1.2 Background 

The HCVF concept is being promoted and applied by schemes involved in the certification of responsible 

forest management in Malaysia. However, it is generally felt that there is insufficient guidance on the 

implementation of the HCVF concept. A series of workshops and meetings were held to initiate and 

facilitate the development of a HCVF toolkit for Malaysia. These efforts were spearheaded by WWF- 

Malaysia who has formed a Technical Working Group to develop this toolkit. 

This toolkit is the outcome of various stages of review and consultation. After internally reviewing the 1st 

Draft, an expert review (written feedback on the 2nd Draft was received from 12 individuals/organisations) 

and a two-day expert group discussion was held in May 2008 (see list of participants in Appendix 12) to 

produce the 3rd Draft. Separate stakeholder consultations for Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak 

provided input for the 4th Draft. Further comments resulted in a 5th Draft, and a final, national-level 

consultation, involving all stakeholders, produced the 6th and Final Draft (see Appendix 13 for list of 

participants). 

1.3 Overview of HCVF 

Besides their economic value, forests also contain environmental and social values, such as wildlife 

habitat, watershed protection and cultural significance. Areas within forests where these values are 

considered to be of outstanding significance or of critical importance based on an agreed set of criteria 

can be defined as High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) areas. Identifying these values, knowing to 

whom these values are considered important, and locating the forest areas which harbour these values 

is the essential first step for the effective assessment and management of these values. 

The HCVF concept was initially developed by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) for use in forest 

management certification. Within FSC certification, forest managers are required to identify any HCVF 

attribute that occur within their individual forest management units and manage them in order to maintain 

or enhance the attributes identified. The FSC definition encompasses exceptional or critical ecological 

attributes, ecosystem services and social functions. 

1 

Lists of most of the relevant legislation and associated guidelines are included in the MC&I(2002). 

-1-

The types of HCVF areas defined by FSC are listed below. 


1 

1.1 

1.2 

1.3 

1.4 

2 

3 

4 

4.1 

4.2 

4.3 

5 

6 

Element 

Forest areas containing globally, regionally or nationally significant concentrations of 

biodiversity values 

Protected areas 

Threatened and endangered species 

Endemic species 

Critical temporal use 

Globally, regionally or nationally significant large landscape-level forests 

Forest areas that are in or contain rare, threatened or endangered ecosystems 

Forest areas that provide basic services of nature in critical situations 

Forests critical to water catchments 

Forests critical to erosion control 

Forests providing barriers to destructive fire 

Forest areas fundamental to meeting basic needs of local communities 

(e.g. subsistence, health) 

Forest areas critical to local communities’ traditional cultural identity 

The ‘HCV’ 1-6 numbering system used by the Global HCVF Toolkit (Jennings et al., 2003) is generally 

accepted and is adopted for this toolkit. 

The identification and management of HCVFs at the Forest Management Unit (FMU) level requires the 

following steps: 

1. Interpret the global definition (this toolkit) 

2. Identify potential HCVF (desktop “preliminary assessment”) 

3. Identify specific HCVF components in the field & through consultation 

4. Zone HCVF areas, buffer zones and note compartments 

5. Identify limits of acceptable change (LAC) for maintaining HCVF 

6. Plan precautionary management prescriptions for HCVF compartments 

7. Implement management activities 

8. Monitor impact of management activities 

9. Evaluate impact of management activities 

10. Adapt management where appropriate 

These steps fit into an adaptive management framework (Figure 1). Steps 1-6 involve planning, Step 7 

action, 8 monitoring, 9 evaluation and 10 planning again. 

PLAN 

EVALUATE 

ACT 

MONITOR 

Figure 1. The Adaptive Management Cycle. 

A detailed approach to managing and monitoring HCVFs is given by the Global Toolkit. 

-2-

1.4 What is this toolkit? 

The HCVF Toolkit for Malaysia is a National Interpretation of the FSC definition and is being developed 

in the context of the Global Toolkit and HCV Resource Network (see www.hcvnetwork.org). This national 

interpretation was derived through a consultative process involving expert input and feedback from 

stakeholders representing Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak. The toolkit will be used to identify, 

manage and monitor HCVF in the field following the general framework below: 

Data 

Global Toolkit 

Identify 

Classification 

Expert Opinion 

Working Group 

National 

Interpretation 

Manage 

Monitor 

HCV Resource 

Network 

Figure 2. The context of a National Interpretation of HCVF. 

In addition, the development of the HCVF Toolkit for Malaysia takes into consideration existing initiatives 

in forest certification, in particular the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS), operated by the 

Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC), and the FSC National Initiative. 

1.5 How to use this toolkit 

Section 2 (Interpretation of HCVF in Malaysia) provides step-by-step explanations and guidelines on 

how to identify potential HCVs in an area. The guidelines are presented in tabular format, with one table 

for identification and one table for management recommendations. Suggested tasks are outlined in the 

left column while information sources and guidance documents are listed in the right column. General 

national-level guidance is mentioned first, but where applicable, different information sources are then 

indicated for Peninsular Malaysia (PM), Sabah and Sarawak. Additional useful information is provided in 

the form of appendices at the end of this toolkit. 

Although this toolkit includes useful practical information, much of the guidance on HCVs is necessarily 

general. It should be kept in mind that all surveys and monitoring protocols are necessarily site-specific, 

and one uniform approach cannot be recommended for all situations. As such this toolkit only functions 

as a guide, and is not intended to serve as a how-to manual for conducting fieldwork; forest managers 

are advised to seek appropriate input and further details from relevant experts. 

Please note that an area may contain several overlapping HCVs, which forest managers may want to use 

as an indication of higher conservation value when devising management prescriptions. Conversely, not 

all six HCVs will necessarily be relevant or present within a FMU, and forest managers are only required 

to manage whatever HCVs actually do exist there. 

-3-

NB: For all HCVs that have been identified, periodic monitoring must be carried out where applicable 

to assess the effectiveness of the management activities. This can be done by referring to results of 

field surveys and Forest Management Plans (FMPs), consulting experts, and carrying out community 

consultations. Areas must be sampled periodically following methods that are designed professionally 

and yield meaningful results. 

1.6 Other potential uses of the toolkit 

This document is primarily intended for application with the FSC Principles & Criteria, and also the 

MC&I(2002), which is relevant to the management of natural forest within the Permanent Reserved Forest 

(i.e. inside gazetted forest reserves). However, it is acknowledged that this document may be of interest 

and potential relevance to other sectors involved in defining/assessing HCVFs. 

The HCV network notes that while forest management is the primary application, the concept also has a 

number of other uses (Figure 3). 


Forest management 

Land use planning 

Policy commitments 

Conservation advocacy 

FSC certification 

non-FSC 

Plantation design 

Expanding agricultural 

commodities 

Responsible purchasing 

Investment 

Lobbying government 

Market campaigns 

Figure 3. Potential applications of the HCV concept 

Source: www.hcvnetwork.org 

This document covers the identification of HCVF and discusses potential management prescriptions 

associated with natural forest management. However the methodology employed for the identification of 

HCVF might potentially be used by sectors who are interested to conduct HCV assessments prior to forest 

conversion for development. Although it is recognised practice that the identification of HCVs does not 

differ from sector to sector, it is acknowledged that this document makes management prescriptions on 

HCVF areas from the point of view of the natural forest sector. Other sectors should consider developing 

additional management prescriptions for their respective purposes via a consultative stakeholder approach 

similar to that followed for the development of this toolkit. 

-4-

2 Toolkit Proper: Interpretation of HCVF in Malaysia 

HCV 1 Biodiversity Values 

Global Toolkit definition: Forest area contains globally, regionally or nationally significant biodiversity 

values (e.g. endemism, endangered species, sites of critical temporal use). 

HCV 1.1 Protected Areas 

All forest areas that have been legally gazetted as Protected Areas under Malaysian legislation (either 

federal or state), are HCV 1.1. The Master List of Protected Areas in Malaysia, commissioned by the 

Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment, has listed all areas that fall under this category, and should 

therefore be the first point of reference. However, it is noted that in Sarawak there is no overlap between 

FMUs and TPAs. 

Identification of HCV 1.1 

Task 

Determine if forest area is adjacent to a 

legally gazetted protected area listed in 

the Protected Areas Master List. 

Data sources & requirements 

Protected Areas Master List 

(NRE, in prep), government gazette notifications for 

protected areas, protected area authorities. 

Sabah: Sabah Parks, Forestry Department. 

Sarawak: Forest Department, SFC 

Management and Monitoring for HCV 1.1 

Management Recommendations 

Determine the boundaries of the 

protected area, identify, comply with and 

enforce rules and regulations (if any) 

governing activities inside (or adjacent 

to) the protected area. 

Determine buffer strip activities. Buffer 

zones should be defined according to 

state regulations or as described in the 

protected area management plans. 

Guidance 

Government gazette notifications for protected areas, 

protected area authorities, forestry authorities. 

PM: National Forestry Act 1984, National Forestry Policy 

1978, State Legal Advisor, Forestry Manual. 

Sabah: Forest Enactment 1968, Land Ordinance 1930 

(Sabah Cap. 68), Wildlife Conservation Enactment 1997, 

Environmental Quality Act 1974, Environment Protection 

Enactment 2002. 

Sarawak: Wild Life Protection Ordinance 1998 (Cap. 

26), Forests Ordinance 1954 (Cap. 126). 

IUCN Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected 

Areas (2003, data.iucn. org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAG-010.pdf), Krau 

Management Plan (www.wildlife.gov.my/printed_material/ 

misc/KrauWRManagementPlan.pdf), other protected area 

management plans, approved FMPs, other governmentapproved 

documents. 

Sarawak: Proposed Amendment of the Forests 

Ordinance. 

-5-

HCV 1.2 Threatened and Endangered Species 

Any species categorised as either Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU) 

on the IUCN Red List, Appendix I of CITES or listed as protected under Malaysian legislation (federal 

or state), is HCV 1.2. However, for practical reasons forest managers may want to limit field surveys of 

fauna to mammals (particularly large ones, over 20kg in weight), birds and herpetofauna, unless literature 

indicates that there are other species in the area which require specific attention. This does not mean that 

other taxa are unimportant, and wherever possible, if the expertise and survey protocols are available, 

these should be covered too. It is also recommended to cross-check the IUCN Red List with the Malaysian 

Red Data Book, once that is available. Where there may be differences between the Malaysian Red Data 

Book and the IUCN Red List, the Malaysian Red Data Book should always take precedence. 


Task 

Determine if forest area contains any 

species of flora and/or fauna categorised 

by IUCN as CR, EN or VU, CITES 

Appendix 1 or any species protected 

under Malaysian legislation. 

Carry out a baseline survey to confirm 

the presence/absence of identified 

CR, EN or VU flora and fauna in forest 

area. This should include consultation 

with local communities for traditional 

ecological knowledge. 


List of experts, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 

(www.iucnredlist.org; for large mammals see Appendix 

1), Malaysian Red Data Book (in prep; flora – FRIM, fauna 

– PERHILITAN), Appendix I of CITES (www.cites.org/eng/ 

resources/ species.html), distribution maps from South 

East Asian Mammal Databank (www.ieaitaly.org/samd/), 

herbaria and museum collections, databases, published 

reports, peer-reviewed journals, current expert opinion. 

PM: Tiger Action Plan (www.wildlife.gov.my/webpagev4_ 

en/printed_material/misc/TAP.pdf), Elephant Habitat map 

(www.wildlife.gov.my/webpagev4_en/printed_material/ 

kmaklumat/gajah.pdf), Schedule I & II of the Protection of 

Wild Life Act 1972. 

Sabah: Wildlife Conservation Enactment 1997, Sabah 

Wildlife Department listing. 

Sarawak: Wild Life Protection Ordinance 1998, Forests 

Ordinance 1954 (Cap. 126), Sarawak Totally Protected, 

Protected Species and Schedules. 

2 

Malaysian Red Data Book (in prep), published guides, 

reports, peer-reviewed journals, current expert 

opinion, local communities. Also see Appendix 3 and 

Appendix 18 for further guidance. 

Sabah: Consult FRC, Agricultural Park in Tenom. 

2 

Examples of such guides include Langhammer et al. (2007, data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAG-015.pdf), Kanjanavanit 

(1997, Appendix 9), Kanchanasakha et al. (1998), Shariff & Mark Rayan (2009), Payne et al. (1998), Robson (2005), 

MacKinnon & Phillipps (1993), Cox et al. (1998) and Das (2006). 

-6-



Develop a management plan that makes 

specific reference to the threatened 

species, if found to exist in the area. 

Specific management measures for 

these species should be identified. 

Obtain input from specialists in 

determining appropriate management 

prescriptions. Where possible this should 

include balanced representation from 

the government, academia and NGOs. 

Guidance 

FRIM, PERHILITAN & NGOs (see Appendix 11 for list 

of organisations). Also see Appendix 3 and 18 and refer 

to current expert opinion/ available scientific data. 

Sabah: Sabah Wildlife Conservation Enactment 1997. 

Sarawak: Wildlife Master Plan (Forest Department). 

3 

List of biodiversity experts . Also see Appendix 11. 

Sabah: Sabah Wildlife Enactment. 

HCV 1.3 Endemism 

Any forest containing endemic species as identified by FRIM, MNS, SFC, Forestry Departments and 

published literature, particularly in high concentrations or highly restricted distribution, can be considered 

HCV 1.3. 


Task 

Determine if forest area contains endemic 

species of flora or fauna. 


List of endemic tree & mammal species (Appendix 2, 

4 

attached), published guides , reports, peer-reviewed 

journals, current expert opinion. 

PM: Ng et al. (1990), Flora of Peninsular Malaysia Online 

(www.tfbc.frim.gov.my/ gettingstarted.asp), Checklist of Birds 

of Malaysia (MNS), PERHILITAN, Forest Departments. 

Sabah: Soepadmo et al. (2006), FRC, Wildlife Department. 

Sarawak: Soepadmo et al. (2006), Forest Department, SFC. 








Guidance 

List of biodiversity experts 

5 

(also see Appendix 11), 

published literature. 

Sabah: FRC, Wildlife Department. 

Sarawak: SFC, Forest Department. 

3 

4 

5 

A list of mammal experts in Malaysia is maintained by the Mammals Sub-Committee of the Faunal Biodiversity Technical 

Committee of the National Biodiversity and Biotechnology Council; they can be contacted c/o the Department of 

Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia (PERHILITAN). 

See Footnote 2 (under ‘Identification of HCV 1.2, pg. 6), for a list of recommended guides. 

In addition to the list of mammal experts (above), a list of botanists in Malaysia is maintained by the Floral Biodiversity 

Technical Committee of the National Biodiversity and Biotechnology Council; they can be contacted c/o the Forest 

Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM). For Sabah, also consult FRC and the Agricultural Park. 

-7-

HCV 1.4 Critical Temporal Use 

6 

Any forest area which is important to wildlife for feeding , nesting, roosting, migration or contains saltlicks 

is HCV 1.4. Limestone hills, although important as habitat, are captured under HCV 3 (Ecosystems). 


Task 

Determine if forest area is used by 

endangered wildlife as critical feeding, 

nesting/roosting sites, pathways or 

contains saltlicks. 


MNS Important Bird Areas (IBAs – see Appendix 4.), 

7 

published guides , reports, peer-reviewed journals, 

maps, field surveys, local communities (through 

interviews), wildlife survey results from NGOs e.g. WCS, 

WWF. Literature should always be ground-truthed 

and supplemented by referring to local communities/ 

guides for traditional ecological knowledge. Also, see 

Langhammer et al. (2007, data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/ 

PAG-015.pdf) for discussion on quantitative thresholds, 

primarily for global significance. 



Identify critical sites for protection (e.g. 

saltlicks, fruit trees, hollow logs, nesting/ 

roosting sites etc.) and prohibit treefelling 

and disturbance in these areas. 






Guidance 

Stevens (1968) gives an overview of the habitat 

requirements of the main mammal species. Community 

consultation, NGOs, published reports, peer-reviewed 

journals, current expert opinion, local communities. Also 

see Appendix 5. 

Chong et al. (2005, WWF). 

PM: Protection of Wild Life Act 1972, Forestry Manual, 

FDPM List of Protected Trees for Wildlife. 

Sabah: FRC, List of Prohibited Tree Species (Forest 

Department) 

List of biodiversity experts (also see Appendix 11), 

literature review/maps/field surveys/community consultation 

for traditional ecological knowledge. 

6 

7 

An example of this are trees in Sabah and Sarawak known as Kogopon (Castanopsis spp.) and Tikalod (Lithocarpus 

spp.) whose fruits are an important food source for wild pigs (Sus scrofa or S. barbatus). 

See Footnote 2 (under ‘Identification of HCV 1.2’, pg. 6), for a list of recommended guides. 

-8-

HCV 2 Landscape-level Forest 

Global Toolkit definition: Forest area contains or is part of a globally, regionally or nationally significant 

large landscape level forest where significant populations of most if not all naturally occurring wildlife 

species exist in natural patterns of distribution and abundance. 

Any forest area that forms or is part of a linkage between larger forest complexes, and can thus provide 

connectivity between fragments or act as a wildlife corridor for the movement of animals from one complex 

to another, is considered HCV 2. This HCVF can serve as a buffer zone to protected areas. Its identification 

and management should be tailored towards the needs of umbrella species i.e. sensitive, wide-ranging 

wildlife that are particularly susceptible to forest fragmentation and human population pressures. Refer to 

Appendix 1 for a list of large mammals. 

Identification of HCV 2 

Task 

Determine if forest area falls within or 

next to a large forest complex, or forms 

a critical linkage between large forest 

complexes. 

Determine the presence, abundance 

and persistence of umbrella species 

in the area, if possible and data is 

available. 

Obtain input from government agencies 

and NGOs that are identifying and 

managing linkages. 


Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Biodiversity 

Conservation in Planted Forest 2007 (MTCC), other 

published materials. 

PM: National Physical Plan (Figure 4, below, DTCP), 

Final Report of the CFS Master Plan for Ecological 

Linkages (DTCP, in prep, www.townplan.gov.my/), Tiger 

Action Plan (www.wildlife.gov.my/webpagev4_en/printed_ 

material/misc/TAP.pdf). 

Sabah: EPU, Sabah Biodiversity Centre, Kinabatangan 

Corridor of Life (WWF). 

Sarawak: Forest Department, SFC, Map of TPAs & PFEs. 

8 9 

Appendix 1, List of Experts , published guides , reports, 

peer-reviewed journals, maps, field surveys, community 

consultation for traditional ecological knowledge. 

DTCP, NRE, PERHILITAN, WWF, WCS. 

Management and Monitoring for HCV 2 


Effective wildlife corridors should remain 

under forest cover of at least 500m in 

width (protected as forest reserves or as 

protected areas to prevent a change in 

land use). Wildlife corridors should be wide 

enough for identified umbrella species. 

Any linear developments (such as roads, 

railways or pipelines) should incorporate 

appropriate wildlife crossings and 

associated mitigation measures. Disturbed 

areas no longer under forest cover should 

be reforested or allowed to regenerate. 

Guidance 

Final Report of the CFS Master Plan for Ecological Linkages 

(DTCP, in prep, www.townplan. gov.my/), Bond (2003), Bennett 

(2003), WWF-Malaysia (2007a). 

PM: DTCP (2009), PERHILITAN. 

Sabah: Wildlife Department. 

Sarawak: SFC 

8 

9 

See Footnotes 3 and 5 (pg. 7). 

See Footnote 2 (under ‘Identification of HCV 1.2’, pg. 6), for a list of recommended guides. 

-9-

1 

2 

3 

Linkages 

4 

Forest Cover 

Forest Complexes 

Figure 4. Forest Complexes and Linkages identified by the National Physical Plan (DTCP, 2005: 5-38) 

HCV 3 Ecosystems 

Global Toolkit definition: Forest area contains or is part of a threatened or endangered ecosystem. 

Any forest area that contains an ecosystem/habitat type identified as a priority for protection by the National 

Conservation Strategy (NCS), PERHILITAN Ecosystem Assessment report, Forestry Departments, FRIM, 

or SFC, and/or is confirmed as such by current expert opinion, is HCV 3. Some ecosystems are naturally 

rare, but some others are becoming increasingly threatened by pressure from human activities. Due to 

rapid changes, existing data may be outdated and some particularly threatened ecosystems may already 

need to be considered Priority 1. A good example of this would be lowland dipterocarp forests, peat 

swamps and limestone habitats. Always refer to current expert opinion for confirmation. 

-10-


Task 

Determine if forest area contains or 

is part of a threatened or endangered 

ecosystem. 


Priority Habitats Table of the NCS (Table 1, below), 

National Assessment of Biodiversity (PERHILITAN). 

However, this data may be outdated and it is advisable 

to cross-reference with current expert opinion e.g. 

FRIM, PERHILITAN, FRCs (Sabah & Sarawak). Also, for 

limestone see Price (2001) and Lim & Kiew (1997). 

PM: PERHILITAN ecosystem assessment report (2004, 

summary in Appendix 6). 

Sabah: Forestry Department. Also see Appendix 7. 

Sarawak: SFC, Forest Department. Also see Appendix 8. 

Table 1: NCS Priority Habitats. 

Forest Type 

Johor 

Kedah 

Kelantan 

Melaka 

Negeri Sembilan 

Pahang 

Perak 

Perlis 

Pulau Pinang 

Selangor 

Terengganu 

Kuala Lumpur 

Sabah 

Sarawak 

Extreme lowland 

Lowland dipterocarp 

Hill dipterocarp 

Upper dipterocarp 

Montane oak 

Montane ericaceous 

Heath 

Limestone 

Ultrabasic 

Quartz ridge 

River (montane) 

River (sarace) 

River (neram) 

River (rasau) 

Freshwater swamp 

Peal swamp 

Mangrove 

Nipah 

Scrub 

Lake 

1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 

2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 

3 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 

2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 

2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 

3 3 

3 1 

3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 

3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 

2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 

3 3 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 

1 2 1 2 1 1 

2 1 1 1 2 2 1 

3 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 

2 1 2 2 2 

1=Highest priority; 2=Medium priority; 3=Least priority 

Source: EPU (1993: III 156 Table 7.1). 

-11-



Determine the forest habitat type and 

its level of threat, and identify the 

boundaries on maps. 

Zone compartments containing undisturbed 

HCV3 ecosystems for protection and 

disturbed HCV3 ecosystems for 

restoration. 

Guidance 

PM: Forest Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Available 

from FDPM Headquarters and FRIM), report on National 

Forest Inventories. See also Appendix 6, attached. 

Sabah: Detailed maps from FRC, Forestry Department & 

Biodiversity Council (an overview is given in Appendix 7). 

Sarawak: Biodistrict map (Sarawak Biodiversity Centre) 

detailed maps from SFC, Forest Department (an overview 

is given in Appendix 8) 

Field assessment/remote sensing/consultation with the 

relevant forest authorities. 

HCV 4 Services of Nature 

Global Toolkit definition: Forest area provides basic services of nature in critical situations. 

HCV 4.1 Watershed Protection 

HCV 4.1 includes dam catchment areas and any forest area legally gazetted as a Protection Forest for 

water catchment under the National Forestry Act 1984, water protection area under the Sabah Water 

Resources Enactment 1998 or Class I Protection Forest Reserve under the Sabah Forest Enactment 

1968, water catchment areas under the Sarawak Water Ordinance 1994 or areas classified as Terrain 4 

in Sarawak’s First Schedule: Forest Management Plan, and Forest Timber License, or areas gazetted for 

watershed protection under any other state or federal legislation e.g. the National Land Code 1965. 


Task 

Determine if forest area: 

1) Has been legally gazetted 

as protection area under the 

National Forestry Act (PM), 

Sabah Forest Enactment or 

Water Resources Enactment 

(Sabah) or Sarawak Water 

Ordinance, or classified 

as Terrain 4 (Sarawak); or 

2) Has been legally gazetted for 

watershed protection under any 

other federal or state legislation; or 

3) Is a dam catchment area. 


Government gazette notifications, 

FMPs, forest authorities, dam management agencies. 

Sabah: Forestry Department, DID. 

Sarawak: Forest Department, JKR, Sarawak Rivers 

Board, Department of Health, Water Resources Council. 

-12-



Identify and mark catchment boundaries 

on maps and include in FMPs, 

establishing a ‘no logging’ buffer zone 

outside the catchment area. 

Timber harvesting activities within 

the water catchment and buffer areas 

should be prohibited unless permitted 

by law. 

Guidance 

FMPs, topographic maps, gazette notifications. Also 

refer to NFC decisions. 

PM: Forestry Department guidelines (e.g. Forestry 

Manual 1995), National Physical Plan. 

Sabah: Sabah Water Resources Enactment 1998, RIL 

guidelines (Forestry Department). 

Sarawak: Sarawak Water Ordinance 1994, guidelines 

from local authorities, including Forest Department & 

Department of Health. 

HCV 4.2 Erosion Control 

HCV 4.2 includes forest areas that have been legally gazetted for soil protection or conservation under 

federal and state laws e.g. the National Forestry Act 1984 (Peninsular Malaysia), forest areas which lie 

on slopes over 25 degrees (Sabah), areas classified as Terrain 4 in First Schedule: Forest Management 

Plan, Forest Timber License (Sarawak), and riparian areas covered under the DID guidelines. 


Task 

Determine if forest contains riparian 

area covered under DID guidelines. 

PM: Determine if steep forest area 

has been officially classified as soil 

protection forest. 

Sabah: Determine if forest area is on a 

slope over 25 degrees and covers more 

than 2 ha. 

Sarawak: Determine if forest area is 

classified as Terrain 4. 


Government Gazette Notifications, RIL guidelines 

(Forest departments), DID guidelines, FMPs, finescale 

topography maps (if available), FRIM Soil Erosion 

Study. 

Sabah: Sabah Water Resources Enactment 1998. 

Sarawak: Forest Engineering Plan, Management Plan 

Prescription (Forest Department), EIA report (NREB). 



Avoid the construction of skid trails 

inside steep areas. Ground-based 

timber harvesting activities should 

be prohibited unless permitted by the 

relevant authority. 

Guidance 

RIL guidelines, FMPs, FRIM Soil Erosion Study, 

Appendix 11. 

PM: Forestry Manual (FDPM). 

Sabah: RIL guidelines (Forestry Department). 

Sarawak: Forest Engineering Plan, Management Plan 

Prescription (Forest Department), EIA report (NREB). 

-13-

HCV 4.3 Barriers to Destructive Fire 

Any specific areas that can act as barriers to provide protection of forests, especially forests with high 

conservation values, from fire, in areas that are generally fire-prone and where the consequences are 

potentially severe, can be considered HCV 4.3. 


Task 

Determine if area is prone to fire e.g. 

peat swamps and forest areas which 

have been subject to fire previously. 

Include other examples of fire-prone 

areas (e.g. podzolic or edaphic soils) 

Determine if area is adjacent to any 

forests containing any other HCVs. 

Determine if forest area is adjacent 

to plantations (any plantation-forest 

edge is susceptible to fire during long 

dry periods) or settlements (Sarawak: 

‘temuda’). 


State Forestry Department records of forest fire 

occurrences. 

Maps, satellite imagery and data on other HCVFs in 

FMU (Forest Departments, Malaysian Remote Sensing 

Agency, data from HCVF assessments). 

Maps and satellite imagery of settlements and land 

use in and adjacent to the FMU (Forest Departments, 

Malaysian Remote Sensing Agency), community 

consultation for traditional ecological knowledge. 

Sabah: Forest Fire Rating (Forestry Department). 



Include in FMP the identification of 

any specific features that may act as 

barriers to fire, and prescriptions for 

managing these areas. Natural barriers 

could include water courses, ridges or 

gullies. Intact natural forest may also 

act as a natural barrier. 

Particular attention should be paid to 

the maintenance of the water table in 

vulnerable peat swamp forests. 

Guidance 

Malaysian Meteorological Department Fire Danger 

Rating System (www.met.gov.my) 

10. 

Sabah: Fire Risk map (plantations, http://www.forest. 

sabah.gov.my/conservation/nfire%20prevention.pdf) Fire 

Danger Rating System (FDRS), community consultation 

for traditional ecological knowledge. 

Sarawak: Applicable for License Planted Forest holders 

where Fire Management Plan is outlined in Tree Planting 

Plan. 

Monitor the frequency of fires in 

previously identified fire-prone areas. 

Field surveys. 

10 

The Malaysian Meteorological Department (MMD) maintains a fire danger rating system for the whole of the country. 

MMD uses a number of indicators of the potential for fires to start and spread throughout Malaysia at any time. 

-14-

The Sabah Forestry Department has records of the extent of forest fire damage in the state (a very 

simplified version is shown in Figure 6; the Department should be consulted for more specific maps 

relevant to sites undergoing HCV assessments). Areas which have burned in the past are particularly 

vulnerable to burning again. 

Figure 6. Forest fires in Sabah during 1983 (yellow) and 1997/1998 (red) areas that burned in both years 

are shaded orange; forest cover c. 2000 is shown in grey (adapted from Stibig et al., 2002). 

HCV 5 Basic Needs of Local Communities 

Global Toolkit definition: Forest area is fundamental to meeting basic needs of local communities. 

A forest area may be considered HCV 5 if it contains or is adjacent to settlements which depend on 

produce from that forest for basic subsistence or health needs. Examples include hunting grounds or 

areas from which minor forest products such as bamboo, rattan and medicinal plants are collected, and 

which are regularly visited by community members for this purpose. The community may be living either 

in or adjacent to the forest. However, identification and management of this HCV must always involve 

participation of the communities themselves. * 


Task 

Determine if forest area contains or is 

adjacent to any settlements. Identify and 

consult with the relevant communities. 

Determine the level of dependence of 

identified local communities on forest 

produce (e.g. minor forest products) and 

services for basic subsistence/health 

needs. Identify and map out specific 

locations through a participatory approach 

with the communities in question. 


Map/list of villages from District Office/Resident’s Office, 

FMPs, community consultation. 

PM: Department of Orang Asli Affairs. 

Sarawak: Native Customs Council, Leigh (2002). 

Site-specific community survey (Appendix 9, attached). 

LOAM (Aldrich & Sayer, 2007, Appendix 10), 

Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Sustainable Forest 

Management (WWF, SFC). 

Sabah: Council of Elders (refer to KDCA for details). 

Sarawak: Native Customs Council, Forest Ordinance 

(communal forest), Land Code. 

* This HCV does not apply to recently migrated communities. 

-15-



Conduct multi-stakeholder consultations 

between local communities and forest 

and local authorities to identify and 

protect specific forest compartments/ 

zones/ components according to the 

basic needs they support. Examples 

to follow would be the Landscape 

Outcome Assessment Methodology 

(LOAM, Aldrich & Sayer, 2007). It is 

recommended that a credible, neutral 

independent party be present during 

consultations, followed by a desktop 

review of the findings. If the consultation 

itself is conducted by a third party, the 

desktop review is not required. 

Guidance 

Aldrich & Sayer (2007, Appendix 10), Dudley & Stolton 

(2008,www.equilibriumresearch.com/upload/document/ 

PA_BAT_-_Final_Feb_2008.pdf), Conflict Resolution 

Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management (WWF, 

SFC). 

Sabah: PACOS Trust, KDCA & other cultural 

associations. For mapping of ethnic groups refer to the 

Sabah Cultural Board & Sabah Museum. 

Sarawak: Native Customs Council, Resident’s Office. 

HCV 6 Cultural Identity of Local Communities 

Global Toolkit definition: Forest area is critical to local communities’ traditional cultural identity. 

A forest is considered HCVF 6 if it has been important for a local (particularly indigenous) community’s 

cultural, ecological, or religious activities. The community may be living either in or adjacent to the forest. 

Examples of such sites within a forest include burial grounds or sacred areas which cannot be replaced 

with alternatives and/or would cause drastic cultural change within the community. Identification and 

management of this HCV must always involve participation of the communities themselves. * 


Task 

Determine if forest contains areas and/ 

or sites important to a local community’s 

cultural, ecological, or religious activity. 


Site-specific community survey (Appendix 9). Conflict 

Resolution Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management 

(WWF, SFC). 

Peninsula: Jabatan Hal-Ehwal Orang Asli 

Sabah: Cultural Board, Pejabat Hal-Ehwal Anak Negeri, 

Sabah Museum, Sabah cultural associations – listing of 

registered ones can be obtained from the Registrar of 

Societies. 

Sarawak: Museum Department, Native Customs Council. 

* This HCV does not apply to recently migrated communities. 

-16-



Conduct multi-stakeholder consultations 

between local communities and forest 

and local authorities to identify and 

protect specific forest compartments/ 

zones/ components according to their 

traditional cultural, ecological, economic 

or religious importance. Examples 

to follow would be the Landscape 

Outcome Assessment Methodology 

(LOAM, Aldrich & Sayer, 2007). It is 

recommended that consultations are 

carried out by an independent party, 

consistent with recognised HCV good 

practice. 

Guidance 

Aldrich & Sayer (2007, Appendix 10), Dudley & Stolton 

(2008, www.equilibriumresearch.com/upload/document/ 

PA_BAT_-_Final_Feb_2008.pdf). Conflict Resolution 

Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management (WWF, 

SFC). 

PM: District Office, Department of Orang Asli Affairs. 

Sabah: Native Courts, KDCA, PACOS Trust & other 

cultural associations. For mapping of ethnic groups refer 

to the Sabah Cultural Board & Sabah Museum. 

Sarawak: Native Customs Council, Resident’s Office. 

-17-

3 References 

Aldrich, M. and Sayer, J. (2007). Landscape Outcomes Assessment Methodology “LOAM” – In Practice. WWF 

Forests For Life Programme. 

Anon. (1999). Capacity Building & Strengthening the Protected Areas System in Peninsular Malaysia: A Master 

Plan. Department of Wildlife and National Parks; Economic Planning Unit; DANCED. (2nd ed.). 

Anon. (2004). Fertilizer use by crop in Malaysia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 

Rome, Italy. 71 pp. 

Anon. (2005). Forestry in Sabah: Commemorative Edition. Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan, 

Malaysia. 176 pp. 

Ashton, P.S. (1976). Mixed dipterocarp forest and its variation with habitat in Malayan lowlands: a 

reevaluation at Pasoh. Malayan Forester, 39:56-72. 

Bennett, E.L. and Gumal, M.T. (2001). The interrelationships of commercial logging, hunting and wildlife 

in Sarawak. Recommendations for forest management. In The Cutting Edge - Conserving Wildlife 

in Logged Tropical Forests. (Eds. Fimbel, R. A. Grajal, A. and Robinson, J.G.) Pp. 359 – 374. 

Bennett, A.F. (2003). Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife 

Conservation. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). 

Blockhus, J.M., Dillenbeck, M., Sayer, J.A. and Wegge, P. (1992). Conserving Biological Diversity in 

Managed Tropical Forests. IUCN/ITTO , Gland, Switzerland and UK. 

Bond, M. (2003). Principles of Wildlife Corridor Design. Center for Biological Diversity, Tucson, USA. 

Chong, M.H.N., Tang, S.H. and Suksuwan, S. (2005). Management Recommendations for Wildlife Saltlicks 

with Particular Reference to Sira Air Hangat at Ulu Muda Forest Reserve, Kedah. WWF-Malaysia 

Project MY 0163c. November 2005. 

Cox, M., van Dijk, P.P., Nabhitabhata, J. and Thirakhupt, K. (1998). A Photographic Guide to Snakes and 

Other Reptiles of Peninsular Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore. New Holland Publishers Ltd. 

Das, I. (2006). A Photographic Guide to Snakes and Other Reptiles of Borneo. Ralph Curtis Books. 

Davison, G.W.H. and Zubaid Akbar (2007). The Status of Mammalian Biodiversity in Malaysia. In: L.S.L. 

Chua, L.G. Kirton and L.G. Saw (eds.) Status of Biological Diversity in Malaysia and Threat 

Assessment of Plant Species in Malaysia, Proceedings of the Seminar and Workshop, 28-30 June 

2005. Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), Kepong, Malaysia. pp. 3-27. 

DTCP (2005). National Physical Plan. Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Kuala Lumpur, 

Malaysia. 

DTCP (2009). Central Forest Spine (CFS): Masterplan for Ecological Linkages. Department of Town and 

Country Planning (DTCP), Malaysia. 

Dudley, N. and Stolton, S. (2008). The Protected Areas Benefits Assessment Tool: A methodology. World 

Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). 

DWNP (2004). Using an ecological model to assess the performance of a protected areas system at 

conserving biodiversity at the ecosystems level. Review of biodiversity in protected areas in 

Peninsular Malaysia. Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), Kuala Lumpur, 


-18-

Feinsinger, P. (2001). Designing Field Studies for Biodiversity Conservation. Island Press Publications. 

Francis, C. M. (2008). A Field Guide to the Mammals of South-east Asia. New Holland Publishers (UK) Ltd. 

Global Environment Fund (1998). Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation for Biodiversity Projects. World 

Bank, Washington, USA. 

Higman, S., Mayers, J., Bass, S., Judd, N. and Nussbaum, R. (2005). Sustainable Forestry Handbook - (2nd 

Edition). Earthscan, London. 

Hilton-Taylor, C. (compiler), (2008). 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and 

Cambridge, UK. 

Jennings, S., Nussbaum, R., Judd, N. and Evans, T. (2003). The High Conservation Value Forest Tool Kit. 

ProForest, Oxford, UK. 

Kanchanasakha, B., Simcharoen, S. and Than, U.T. (1998). Carnivores of Mainland South East Asia. WWF- 

Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand. 

Kanjanavanit, O. (1997). The mammal tracks of Thailand. Green World Foundation, Bangkok. Thailand. 

Langhammer, P.F., Bakarr, M.I., Bennun, L.A., Brooks, T.M., Clay, R.P., Darwall, W., De Silva, N., Edgar, G.J., 

Eken, G., Fishpool, L.D.C., Fonseca, G.A.B. da, Foster, M.N., Knox, D.H., Matiku, P., Radford, E.A., 

Rodrigues, A.S.L., Salaman, P., Sechrest, W. and Tordoff, A.W. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis 

of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN, Gland, 

Switzerland. 

Leigh, M.B. (2002). Mapping the peoples of Sarawak. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak Press, Kuching, Malaysia. 

Lim, S.H. and Kiew, R. (1997). Gazetteer of limestone localities in Sabah, Borneo. Garden’s Bulletin Singapore 

49: 111-118. 

MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (1993). A Field Guide to the Birds of Borneo, Sumatra, Java and Bali. Oxford 

University Press, USA. 

Marcot, B., Gullison, R. and Barborak, J. (2001). Protecting habitat elements and natural areas in the managed 

forest matrix. In The Cutting Edge; Conserving Wildlife in Logged Tropical Forests. (Eds. Fimbel, R., 

Grajal, A. and Robinson, J.). Pp 523 – 558. Columbia University Press, New York, USA. 

Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., Nasi, R., Augeri, D., Rosenbaum, B., Iskandar, D., Setyawati, T., Lammertink, M.J., 

Rachmatika, I., Wong, A., Soehartono, T., Stanley, S., and O’Brien, T. (2005). Life after logging: 

Reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo. CIFOR, WCS and 

UNESCO, Bogor, Indonesia. 

Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., Nasi, R. and Stanley, S.A. (2006). Wildlife conservation in Bornean timber concessions. 

Ecology and Society 11(1): 47. 

MNS (2005). A Handbook of Important Bird Areas in Malaysia (Compiled by Yeap Chin Aik, Anthony C. 

Sebastian and G.W.H. Davison). Malaysian Nature Society (MNS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 

Morrison, J.C., Sechrest, W., Dinerstein, E., Wilcove, D.S. & Lamoreux, J.F. (2007). Persistence of large 

mammal faunas as indicators of global human impacts. Journal of Mammology 88(6): 1363-1380. 

Ng, F.S.P., Low, C.M. and Mat Asri Ngah Sanah (1990). Endemic Trees of the Malay Peninsula. Research 

Pamphlet No. 106. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. 

NRE (in prep.). The Master List of Protected Areas in Malaysia – A Tool for National Conservation Management 

and Planning. A report prepared by WWF-Malaysia for the Ministry of Natural Resources and the 

Environment (NRE) with the assistance of the Danish International Development Assistance (Danida).

NSC (2004). Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification [MC&I(2002)]. National 

Steering Committee (NSC), Malaysian Timber Certification Council, Kuala Lumpur, 11 August. ii+53 pp. 

Palmberg, C. (1987). Conservation of genetic resources of woody species. Paper prepared for Simposio 

sobre Silvicultura y Mejoramiento Genetico, Centro Investigacion y Estudios Forestales (CIEF), Buenos 

Aires, Argentina April 6-10, 1987. 

Payne, J., Francis, C.M. & Phillipps, K. (1998). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Borneo. Sabah Society, 


Price, L. (2001). Caves and karsts of Peninsular Malaysia. Gua Publications, Kuala Lumpur. 

Rainforest Alliance and ProForest (2003). Identifying, Managing and Monitoring High Conservation Value 

Forests in Indonesia: A Toolkit for Forest Managers and other Stakeholders. 

Robson, C. (2005). Birds of Southeast Asia. Princeton University Press, USA. 

Shamsudin Ibrahim, Abd. Razak Othman, Noor Azlin Yahya, Shamsudin Musa, Shafiah Muhammad Yussof, 

Baharuddin Kasran & Siti Aisah Shamsudin (2003). Management Prescriptions for Non-Production 

Functional Classes of Forest. Malayan Forest Records, No. 46. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, 

Kepong. 

Shariff Wan Mohamad & Mark Rayan Darmaraj (2009). A General Guide to Camera-trapping Large Mammals 

in Tropical Rainforests, with Particular Reference to Tigers. WWF-Malaysia, Petaling Jaya. 

Soepadmo, E., Julia, S., Soh, W.K., and Yahud, W. (2006). Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak - Species 

Diversity and Endemism. In: Ho, Y.F. & Sarifah, K.A. (eds). Hightlights of FRIM’s Non-IRPA Projects 

2006. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong. pp. 35-52. 

Stevens, W. E. (1968). Habitat Requirements of Malayan Mammals. Malayan Nature Journal 22: 3-9. 

Stibig, H.J., Beuchle, R., and Janvier, P. (2002). Forest cover map of insular Southeast Asia at 1:5 500 000, 

derived from SPOT-Vegetation satellite images. Tropical Ecosystem Environment Observations by 

Satellites (TREES) Publications Series D: Thematic Outputs No. 3. Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, 

Institute for Environment and Sustainability. European Communities Joint Research Council. p. 11. 

Sutherland, W. J. (1996). Ecological census techniques: A handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 

Thomas, L. and Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, 

Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 

Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Forest Department Sarawak (1996). A Master Plan for Wildlife in 

Sarawak. Forest Department Sarawak, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. 

Wilson, D. E. (1996). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals. 

Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA. 

WWF-Malaysia. (2007a). Proceedings of the Introductory Workshop on Creating and Re-establishing Ecological 

Corridors within the Central Forest Spine. 30-31 July 2007. Awana Genting Highlands Golf & Country 

Resort, Pahang. 

WWF-Malaysia. (2007b). Sections on HCV and HCVF for USM FMP (300707). Ulu Segama and Malua Forest 

Management Plan. WWF-Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu. 

Yamada, I. (1997). Tropical Rain Forests of Southeast Asia: A Forest Ecologist’s View. University of Hawaii 

Press, Honolulu, USA.

Appendix 1. Threatened & Endangered Species of large mammal in Malaysia. 

Global Status 

CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR) 

Dicerorhinus sumatrensis 

Sumatran Rhinoceros, Badak Sumatera 

Regional Status 

P. Malaysia Sabah Sarawak 

CR 

(ssp. sumatrensis) 

CR 

(ssp. harrissoni) 

RE? 

(ssp. harrissoni) 

ENDANGERED (EN) 

Bos javanicus 

Banteng/Tembadau 

RE? 

EN 

(ssp. lowi) 

RE? 

(ssp. lowi) 

Cuon alpinus 

Dhole, Wild Dog, Serigala 

EN 

NA 

NA 

Elephas maximus 

Asian Elephant, Gajah 

EN 

EN 

(ssp. borneensis) 

NE/NA 

Panthera tigris 

Tiger, Harimau Belang 

EN 

NE/NA 

NE/NA 

Pongo pygmaeus 

Orang Utan/Mawas 

RE/NA 

EN 

(ssp. pygmaeus) 

EN 

(ssp. morio) 

Tapirus indicus 

Tapir/Tenuk/Cipan 

EN 

NA 

NA 

VULNERABLE (VU) 

Bos gaurus 

Gaur, Seladang 

VU 

NA 

NA 

Capricornis sumatraensis 

Serow, Kambing Gurun 

VU 

NA 

NA 

Rusa unicolor 

Sambar Deer, Rusa/Payau 

VU 

VU 

VU 

Helarctos malayanus 

Sun Bear, Beruang Madu 

VU 

VU 

VU 

Neofelis nebulosa/diardi 

Clouded Leopard 

Harimau Dahan 

VU 

VU 

VU 

Sus barbatus 

Bearded Pig 

Babi Hutan 

VU 

VU 

VU 

Mammal species are classified as large if their body weight is more than 20kg (Morrison et al., 2007). 

Source: www.iucnredlist.org (2009); NA=Not Applicable; RE=Regionally Exinct; NE=Not Evaluated.

Appendix 2. Selected localities with endemic tree or mammal species 

(adapted from Ng et al., 1990; Soepadmo et al., 2006; Francis, 2008; as well as Payne et al., 1985). 

A. Tree Species 

1. Bako, Sarawak: Shorea bakoensis 

2. Bau, Sarawak: Shorea calcicola 

3. Belaga, Sarawak: Gonystylus decipiens, Hopea longirostrata, Microtropis argentea, Payena 

grandistipula 

4. Bintang Range, Perak: Abdulmajidia maxwelliana, Brownlowia kleinhovoidea, Chisocheton 

perakensis, Eugenia gageana, E. quadrata, E. swettenhamiana, E. taipingensis, Glycosmis 

perakensis, Knema retusa, Kokoona coriacea, Pentace perakensis, Pseudovaria taipingensis, 

Sterculia microphylla 

5. Bota Kiri, Perak: Ptychopyxis triradiata 

6. Bukit Bauk, Dungun, Terengganu: Dacryodes breviracemosa, Pseuduvaria cerina 

7. Bukit Fraser (Gunung Ulu Semangkok: Pahang, Selangor): Ardisia nurii, Diospyros selangorensis, 

Endiandra scrobiculata, Glochidion stylosum, Goniothalmus holttumii, Lithocarpus burkilii, Pithecellobium 

cuneadenum, Styrax fraserensis, Talauma oblanceolata, Saurauia mahmudii, S. malayana 

8. Bukit Goh, Pahang: Shorea kuantanensis 

9. Bukit Keledang, Perak: Cleistanthus glaucus, Diospyros gambleana, Diplodiscus scortechinii 

10. Bukit Kulong/Bukit Tampurango, Sabah: Dipterocarpus ochraceus 

11. Bukit Tawai, Sabah: Lithocarpus tawaiensis, Madhuca engkikiana, Payena khoonmengiana 

12. Cameron Highlands (Kelantan, Pahang, Perak): Ardisia glanduligera, Castanopsis scortechinii, 

Chionanthus caudifolius, Cinnamomum pubescens, Mesua purseglovei, Nothaphoebe pahangensis, 

Schefflera wrayi 

13. Danum Valley, Sabah: Engelhardia danumensis 

14. Dindings, Perak (Pulau Pangkor/Lumut): Ardisia calophylla, Eugenia auriculata, Homalium spathulatum, 

Hydnocarpus scortechinii, Shorea lumutensis 

15. Endau-Rompin (Pahang, Johore): Anisophyllea reticulata, Ptychopyxis watsonii, Schoutenia furfuracea, 

Trigonostemon wetriifolius 

16. Genting Highlands (Gunung Ulu Kali: Pahang, Selangor): Ardisia mystica, A. viminea, Neolitsea 

coccinea, Sauropus elegantissimus 

17. Gunung Batu Puteh (Pahang, Perak): Ardisia longepedunculata, Eugenia plumbea, Neolitsea 

mollissima 

18. Gunung Belumut, Johore: Fordia incredibilis, Garcinia holttumii 

19. Gunung Inas, Selama, Perak: Diplospora velutina, Eugenia inasensis, Mallotus smilaciformis 

20. Gunung Jerai, Kedah: Casearia flexula, Neolitsea kedahense, Talauma gracilior 

21. Gunung Kinabalu, Sabah: Chionanthus kinabaluensis, Ficus paramorpha, Helicia symplocoides, 

H. maxwelliana, Ilex mesilauensis, Illicium kinabaluense, Microtropis ovata, Payena kinabaluensis, 

Symplocos buxifolia, S. buxifolioides, S. colombonensis 

22. Gunung Ledang, Johore: Cleistanthus lanuginosus, Fordia ophirensis, Garcinia montana, Glycosmis 

monticola 

23. Gunung Mulu, Sarawak: Ilex megaphylla, Lithocarpus muluensis 

24. Gunung Nuang (Pahang, Selangor, Negri Sembilan): Glycosmis tomentella 

25. Gunung Pulai, Johore: Ardisia ferox, Croton lucidus, Eugenia johorensis, Tristania pontianensis 

26. Gunung Tapis, Pahang: Microtropis tenuis 

27. Jerangau, Terengganu: Dipterocarpus sarawakensis (Peninsular Malaysia population) 

28. Kaki Bukit, Perlis: Canarium perlisanum 

29. Kapit, Sarawak: Ficus chaii, Gonystylus eximus, Payena kapitensis, Shorea dispar, S. rotundifolia, 

S. woodii 

30. Kedah-Perlis Ridge: Atuna latifolia, Kostermanthus malayana 

31. Kemaman, Terengganu: Ardisia tumida, Cleistanthus major, Eugenia rostadonis 

32. Kinabatangan, Sabah: Crudia venenosa 

33. Kinta Valley, Perak: Alphonsea kingii, Castanopsis catappaefolia, Cleistanthus parvifolius, Crudia 

glauca, Diplodiscus hookerianus, Dipterocarpus semivestitus (Malaysian population), Drypetes 

nervosa, Eugenia camptophylla, Homalium kunstleri, Kopsia scortechinii 

34. Klang Gates Ridge, Selangor (Bukit Batu Tabur): Ilex praetermissa 

35. Kuala Teriang, Pahang: Drypetes detersibilis 

36. Labis, Johore: Xanthophyllum pubescens 

37. Lawas, Sarawak: Diospyros parabuxifolia 

38. Lebir Valley, Kelantan: Aporusa isabellina

39. Lesong, Pahang: Trigonostemon wetriifolius 

40. Lundu, Sarawak: Gonystylus augescens 

41. Malacca: Glycosmis crassifolia, Koilodepas ferrugineum, Lasiococca malaccensis, Mezzetia herveyana, 

Popowia pauciflora 

42. Marudi/Niah, Sarawak: Madhuca ochracea 

43. Matang, Sarawak: Palaquium ferrugineum, P. multiflorum, Ilex beccariana 

44. Mendalom, Keningau, Sabah: Engelhardia mendalomensis 

45. Mukah, Sarawak: Horsfieldia sessilifolia 

46. Panti/Kota Tinggi, Johore: Diospyros johorensis, Dryobalanops beccarii 

47. Penang Island: Horsfieldia penangiana, Ilex pauciflora, Koilodepas wallichianum, Polyalthia hirtifolia 

48. Pulau Langkawi, Kedah: Ardisia langkawiensis, Lagerstroemia langkawiensis, Madhuca calcicola, 

Nothaphoebe condensa 

49. Pulau Tioman: Diospyros insidiosa, Eugenia tiumanensis, Trigonostemon arboreus 

50. Rajang, Sarawak: Kopsia rajangensis 

51. Rawang, Selangor: Chionanthus spiciferus, Hopea subalata 

52. Rengam/Keluang, Johore: Melanochyla fasciculiflora 

53. Sandakan, Sabah: Parartocarpus spinulosus, Lithocarpus sandakanensis 

54. Seri Iskandar, Perak: Dipterocarpus semivestitus 

55. Sri Aman, Sarawak: Aulandra beccarii 

56. Sungai Bantang, Johore: Dipterocarpus tempehes 

57. Sungai Nal, Kelantan: Hopea coriaceae 

58. Taman Negara (Gunung Tahan: Kelantan, Pahang, Terengganu): Adinandra angulata, Agathis 

flavescens, Aquilaria rostrata, Ardisia biniflora, Ar. cardiophylla, Ar. retinervia, Bridelia whitmorei, 

Dacryodes multijuga, Eugenia clypeolata, E. cyrtophylloides, E. pseudoclaviflora, E. tahanensis, 

E. tekuensis, Garcinia clusiaefolia, Lindera montana, Polyosma robusta, Talauma peninsularis, 

Terminthodia viridiflora, Tristania fruticosa 

59. Tasek Glugor, Seberang Perai, Penang: Crudia brevipes 

60. Klang, Selangor: Croton macrocarpus 

61. Ulu Brang-Tersat, Terengganu: Pseuduvaria nervosa 

62. Ulu Segan, Sarawak: Dipterocarpus cuspidatus, Gonystylus nobilis 

B. Mammal Species 

1. Baram, Sarawak: Herpestes hosei, Petaurillus emiliae 

2. Danum Valley, Sabah: Pithecheirops otion 

3. Gunung Benom (Pahang; Selangor): Pipistrellus societatis 

4. Gunung Inas, Perak: Maxomys inas 

5. Gunung Kinabalu, Sabah: Crocidura baluensis (C. fuliginosa baluensis), Melogale everetti 

(M. personata everetti), Suncus ater 

6. Klang, Selangor: Hipposideros nequam, Petaurillus kinlochii 

7. Krau, Pahang: Hipposideros ‘bicolor’ (142 kHz), Kerivoula krauensis 

8. Sandakan/Tabin, Sabah: Hesperoptenus tomesi 

9. Sepilok, Sabah: Pipistrellus cuprosus

Appendix 3. Management of HCV1 (Biodiversity Values - Wildlife). 

There are a number of general guidance documents related to wildlife management in production forest 

11 

(e.g. Meijaard et al. (2005); Higman et al. (2005); Shamsudin et al. (2003) ). Some preliminary questions 

can be asked in the development of a specific wildlife management plan for HCV1: 

1) What expertise is needed? 

In Malaysia, a trained biologist is recommended for managing and monitoring wildlife (especially if 

12 

this involves handling protected species) . If in-house expertise is not available, survey work can be 

outsourced to other organisations (e.g., government wildlife agencies, university researchers, commercial 

consultants or non-government organisations); 

2) How do I identify endangered species? 

There are formal checklists as well as field guidebooks for identifying mammals in all parts of Malaysia. 

The latest checklist is given by Davison and Zubaid (2007) with field guides available for both Peninsular 

13 

Malaysia (Francis, 2008) as well as Borneo (Payne et al., 1985) . Natural history sections of museums 

could also be visited to examine skins to confirm the identification of the specimens if in doubt. 

3) How can I monitor the populations of these species? 

There are numerous manuals available on conducting such wildlife surveys. Among the most relevant 

are the following: Designing Field Studies for Biodiversity Conservation (Feinsinger, 2001); Ecological 

Census Techniques (Sutherland, 1996), Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation for Biodiversity Projects 

(GEF, 1998) and Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals (Ed. 

Wilson, 1996). These textbooks highlight a number of methods for surveying large mammals including 

line transects, camera traps and sign surveys (observations of tracks, wallows, scent locations, scratches, 

burrows, etc.). Other methods are used for surveying birds, bats and other small mammals. 

Wildlife surveys can be included within pre-felling inventories however it should be noted that compared 

with timber inventories they require different skills, different lengths of time, different travel patterns 

through the concession, and attention to different components of the ecosystem. 

11 

12 

13 

Shamsudin et al. (2003) provide recommendations on formulation and implementation of wildlife action plans for 

Peninsular Malaysia; this should be supplemented to include reference to the threatened species identified; additional 

modifications may be required for adapting the approach to Sabah and Sarawak. 

Refer to the Protection of Wild Life Act 1972 (Peninsular Malaysia); the Wildlife Conservation Enactment 1997 (Sabah); 

and the Wild Life Protection Ordinance 1998 (Sarawak). 

Some species are difficult to distinguish in the field so care must be taken when identifying them (e.g. Kinabalu squirrel 

Callosciurus baluensis (which is endemic to Sabah and Sarawak) vs Prevost’s squirrel Callosciurus prevostii (common 

species in most part of SEA); Asian small-clawed otter Aonyx cinereus vs smooth-coated otter Lutrogale perspicillata 

(a vulnerable species)).

For example, a helicopter nest-count and ground survey was used to identify key orangutan habitat in Ulu 

Segama (see Figure 1, below). 

Figure 1. Orang-utan Key Habitats (> 5 nests per km) in Ulu Segama. 

Source: WWF-Malaysia (2007). 

Specific HCV areas for orang-utans within USM were originally defined by marking zones wherever 

more than four orang-utan nests per kilometre were recorded by aerial or ground transects. However, a 

workshop on 21 June 2007 concluded that the entire USM FMU was significant for orang-utans because 

areas supporting high numbers may vary with time and cannot be mapped objectively. Therefore a generic 

prescription of “reduced impact logging” and/or “rehabilitation where appropriate” was put forward (WWF- 

Malaysia, 2007b). 

4) What is the global and national status of these species? 

If you are able to identify the animal via the field guidebooks, refer to their international conservation 

status on websites such as the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (www.iucnredlist.org). Malaysia is 

also preparing its Red List of Threatened Species and this should be available in due time.

5) What is the long-term viability of the local populations of these species? 

When you have carried out surveys of the key endangered species in your FMU you will have quantitative 

data that can be used to estimate their abundance in your FMU. As a rule, to prevent genetic inbreeding, 

at least 50 breeding animals are needed to make up a viable population. The space needed by 50 

breeding mice is very different from that of 50 breeding tigers. As a guide, larger animals generally require 

much larger areas of forest over which to roam (see Figure 2 below). However, it is recognised that 

population boundaries will seldom co-incide with FMU boundaries (with the FMU containing more than 

one population of many species and only part of a population of some species). 

Figure 2. Home range size of selected tropical forest animals plotted as a function of body weight 

(adapted from Marcot et al., 2001). 

6) What area of the FMU influences the maintenance/restoration of this animal? 

A knowledge of the ecology of endangered species is needed to ascertain particular locations within an 

FMU which are critical for the survival of species. Using GIS, you can then overlay a logging plan on the 

wildlife base layer and see if there are areas of impending conflict, such as logging operations or roads 

that will be built too near to or may destroy important sites for wildlife (such as the planned creation of 

a log-landing area at a breeding site). Generally, the conservation of endangered species of mammals 

14 

(such as orangutans) can be aided by conserving certain “keystone” species of tree (such as figs ). 

Depending on the scale of the FMU, at least 10% of the total area is recommended for strict protection 

(Blockhus et al, 1992; Bennett & Gumal, 2001). The following patch sizes refer to the minimum area 

of undisturbed primary forest to be retained as refugia, assuming it is within a larger area (at least one 

logging compartment) of managed/logged forest. 

14 As a generic conservation strategy, emphasis should be put on retaining figs (Ficus spp.) within the species mix for 

enrichment planting.

• Conserve herbaceous plants within plots of not less than 1 ha undisturbed forest, within the larger 

forest area. 

• Conserve animals within plots of not less than 5 ha undisturbed forest, within the larger forest 

area. 

• Conserve wallows within plots of not less than 2.5 ha undisturbed forest, within the larger forest 

area. The larger forest area may be defined by drawing a circle of radius about 1 km from the 

wallow, and then finding natural or man-made features close to that radius to define the boundaries 

of a wildlife protection zone (similar prescriptions can be made for salt-licks, see below). 

• Conserve understorey trees within plots of not less than 2.5 ha undisturbed forest, within the 

larger forest area. 

• Conserve canopy trees within plots of not less than 5 ha undisturbed forest, within the larger 

forest area 

15. 

It would be pragmatic to consolidate tiny forest pockets into fewer but larger protected zones. Corridors 

of unlogged forest should be left between unlogged patches (e.g. Shamsudin et al. (2003) recommend 

that selected areas of riverine buffer should be extended to a width of 500m or 1000m, like beads 

along a chain). Where there is conservation forest at the edge of one forest concession/compartment, 

it should ideally abut conservation forest in the neighbouring concession/compartment. Where a stream 

or river flows from one forest compartment into another, the upstream and downstream zoning should be 

compatible; logging upstream reduces the effectiveness of a conservation zone downstream. 

7) What population changes are acceptable, if logging is to proceed? 

A precautionary approach should be taken towards determining the limit of acceptable change of 

endangered species. In the long term there should be no decline – however short term declines in local 

populations might be tolerable for some species. A decline in local density of more than 20% immediately 

following logging is generally considered to be a significant decline for mammal and bird species in 

tropical Asia (Meijaard et al., 2006). An adaptive precautionary approach should be taken whilst logging 

so as to ensure that local extinctions do not occur. 

15 There have been a number of studies looking at the minimum area necessary for genetic resource conservation 

of typical tree species. Ashton (1976), from species number-area curves for Sarawak, set a standard of 2000 ha 

containing 200 trees as the area necessary. For species with wide latitudinal and altitudinal ranges, one location is 

inadequate, and several sites should be obtained, which take into account ecological variation (Yamada 1997: 308). 

Minimum population size is not definite; however the figures of 50 trees in the short term and 500 in the long term have 

emerged (Palmberg 1987). Because of edge effects, a buffer zone should be established around a tree conservation 

area (Yamada 1997: 309). Examples of tree species conservation recommendations for Peninsular Malaysia are also 

available from FRIM.

Box 1 identifies the key questions to be considered when developing a programme for the management 

of HCV1. 

Box 1. Key Questions for Wildlife Monitoring in FMUs 

In general, the WHY, WHAT, WHERE and HOW questions need to be answered before one proceeds 

on wildlife monitoring. A strategic approach will determine what aspects of wildlife are important in the 

broader context of managing an FMU. 

WHY 

are you creating a monitoring program? What are your objectives? Are they 

scientific or management objectives? To identify rare, endangered, and protected 

wildlife in your FMU? How about endemics, keystone species, indicator species? 

Responsible management will consider all these aspects. 

WHAT 

are you going to measure? Mere presence or some quantitative or qualitative 

value? Or relative abundance, or putting more emphasis on rare species? 

WHERE 

are you going to put your sampling points? Randomly located or in areas where 

these animals are found? What about temporal sampling? Different sampling 

points in space and time yield different answers. This depends on the variables we 

want to monitor. 

HOW 

are you going to measure? Mere presence or some quantitative or qualitative 

value? Or relative abundance, or putting more emphasis on rare species? 

Contributed by: Melvin Gumal and Jason Hon, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Malaysia. For further 

information please contact WCS Malaysia.

Appendix 4. List of Important Bird Areas (IBAs) for Malaysia. 

No. Site State Habitat Type(s) 

1. Nakawan Range Perlis Lowland forest, hill forest, secondary forest 

2. Ulu Muda Kedah Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest, 

secondary forest 

3. Teluk Air Tawar-Kuala 

Muda Coast 

Pulau 

Pinang 

Mangrove forest, intertidal habitats, farmland 

4. Bintang Range Perak Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest, 

montane forest 

5. Matang Coast Perak Mangrove forest, intertidal habitat 

6. Pondok Tanjung Forest 

Reserve 

Perak 

Peat swamp forest, freshwater swamp forest, 

lowland forest, hill forest 

7. Belum-Temengor Perak Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest 

8. Kledang Range Perak Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest, 


9. Central Titiwangsa Range Perak/ 

Pahang 

Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest, 


10. Selangor Heritage Park Selangor Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest 

11. North-Central Selangor Selangor Mangrove forest, intertidal habitat, secondary forest 

Coast 

12. Tanjung Tuan Melaka Mangrove forest, intertidal habitat, hill forest, beach 

forest, secondary forest 

13. Endau-Rompin Johor, 

Pahang 


tropical heath forest 

14. Panti Forest Johor Lowland forest, hill forest 

15. South-West Johor Coast Johor Mangrove forest, intertidal habitat 

16. Krau Wildlife Reserve Pahang Freshwater swamp forest, lowland forest, hill forest, 

sub-montane forest, montane forest 

17. Taman Negara National 

Park 

18. South-east Pahang peat 

swamp forest 

Pahang, 

Terengganu, 

Kelantan 

Pahang 

19. Pulau Layang-Layang Putrajaya 

Federal 

Territory 

Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane, montane 

forest 

Peat swamp forest, freshwater swamp forest, 

lowland forest 

Offshore island, coral reefs, open sea, grassland 

20. Crocker Range Sabah Hill forest, sub-montane forest, montane forest 

21. Mount Kinabalu Sabah Hill forest, sub-montane forest, montane forest 

22. Trus Madi Range Sabah Hill forest, sub-montane forest, montane forest 

23. Kinabatangan Floodplain Sabah Mangrove forest, intertidal habitat, peat swamp 

forest, freshwater swamp forest, floodplain lakes, 

lowland forest, karst/caves 

24. Danum Valley 

Conservation Area 

Sabah Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest 

25. Maliau Basin 

Conservation Area 

Sabah 


montane forest, tropical heath forest 

26. Tawau Hills Park Sabah Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest 

27. Tabin Wildlife Reserve Sabah Lowland forest, hill forest 

28. Klias Peninsula Sabah Mangrove forest, intertidal habitat, peat swamp 

forest, freshwater swamp forest, lowland forest, 

tropical heath forest

29. Kabili-Sepilok Sabah Mangrove forest, lowland forest, hill forest, tropical 

heath forest 

30. Kulamba Wildlife Reserve Sabah Freshwater swamp forest, lowland forest 

31. Sipadan Islands Sabah Offshore islands, coral reefs, beach forest 

32. Mantanani Islands Sabah Offshore islands, open sea, beach forest, karst/ 

caves 

33. Tempasuk Plain Sabah Mangrove forest, freshwater swamp forest, lowland 

forest, open sea, secondary forest, farmland 

34. Tanjung Datu-Samunsam 

Protected Area 

Sarawak 

Coral reefs, seagrass beds, mangrove forest, peat 

swamp forest, lowland forest, hill forest, submontane 

forest, open sea, beach forest, tropical 


35. Gunung Pueh Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest, montane forest 

36. Talang-Satang National 

Park 

Sarawak Offshore islands, coral reefs, seagrass beds, hill 

forest, open sea, beach forest 

37. Bako-Buntal Bay Sarawak Offshore islands, mangrove forest, intertidal 

habitats, peat swamp forest, lowland forest, hill 

forest, sub-montane forest, beach forest, tropical 


38. Bau Limestone Sarawak Karst/caves 

39. Bungo Range Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest, karst/caves 

40. Gunung Penrissen Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest 

41. Sadong-Saribas Coast Sarawak Mangrove forest, intertidal habitats, peat swamp 

forest, beach forest 

42. Pulau Bruit Sarawak Mangrove forest, intertidal habitats, peat swamp 

forest, open sea, farmland 

43. Lanjak-Entimau Wildlife 

Sanctuary 

Sarawak 



44. Hose-Laga Mountains Sarawak Lowland forest, hill forest, sub-montane forest, 

montane forest, tropical heath forest 

45. Baleh Headwaters Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest 

46. Danum-Linau Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest, tropical heath forest, 

grassland 

47. Usun Apau Plateau Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest, montane forest 

48. Dulit Range Sarawak Hill forest sub-montane forest, montane forest 

49. Similajau National Park Sarawak Coral reefs, mangrove forest, freshwater swamp 

forest, lowland forest, open sea, beach forest, 


50. Niah National Park Sarawak Freshwater swamp forest, lowland forest, karst/ 

caves 

51. Lambir Hills National Park Sarawak Hill forest, tropical heath forest 

52. Loagan Bunut National Sarawak Peat swamp forest, floodplain lakes, hill forest 

Park 

53. Mulu-Buda Protected Area Sarawak Freshwater swamp forest, lowland forest, hill forest, 

sub-montane forest, montane forest, karst/caves, 


54. Kelabit Highlands Sarawak Hill forest, sub-montane forest, montane forest 

55. Brunei Bay Sarawak Mangrove forest, intertidal habitats 

Source: ‘A Handbook of Important Bird Areas in Malaysia’ (2005). For further details, information and 

maps please refer to this Handbook, available from the Malaysian Nature Society (MNS).

Appendix 5. Habitat preferences of Malaysian mammals by related groups 

(adapted from Stevens, 1968). 

LIVING HABITS USUAL HABITAT ELEVATION ABUNDANCE 

T G T/G W P P/B C P/B/C L L/I H L/I/H A C R 

INSECTIVORA 

No. 

1 

6 

1 

1 

4 

2 

2 

1 

3 

2 

3 

1 

2 

4 

3 

DERMOPTERA 

PHOLIDOTA 

% 

11 

67 

11 

11 

45 

22 

22 

11 

33 

22 

33 

12 

22 

45 

33 

PRIMATES 

No. 

% 

9 

69 

0 

0 

4 

31 

0 

0 

5 

38 

4 

31 

0 

0 

4 

31 

2 

15 

7 

55 

2 

15 

2 

15 

7 

54 

3 

23 

3 

23 

RODENTIA 

(Squirrels) 

No. 

% 

22 

88 

3 

12 

0 

0 

0 

0 

18 

72 

3 

12 

0 

0 

4 

16 

12 

48 

10 

40 

3 

12 

0 

0 

7 

28 

11 

44 

7 

28 

RODENTIA 

(Rats & mice) 

No. 

% 

5 

19 

21 

81 

0 

0 

0 

0 

11 

42 

6 

23 

9 

25 

0 

0 

14 

55 

4 

15 

4 

15 

4 

15 

10 

38 

7 

27 

9 

35 

RODENTIA 

(Porcupines) 

No. 

% 

0 

0 

3 

100 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

67 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

33 

2 

67 

1 

33 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

34 

1 

33 

1 

33 

CARNIVORA 

No. 

% 

5 

18 

15 

54 

4 

14 

4 

14 

10 

54 

1 

36 

2 

3 

21 

7 

6 

75 

0 

21 

1 

0 

3 

4 

3 

10 

8 

29 

17 

61 

UNGULATES 

(incl. elephant) 

No. 

% 

0 

0 

11 

100 

0 

0 

0 

0 

6 

54 

3 

27 

0 

0 

2 

19 

6 

54 

3 

27 

0 

0 

2 

19 

2 

19 

5 

45 

4 

36 

Legend: 

T = Trees 

G = Ground 

T/G = Trees and Ground 

W = Water 

P/B = Primary and Belukar Forest 

C = Cultivated Land 

P/B/C = Primary and Secondary Forest and Cultivated Land 

L = Lowland 

I = Intermediate 

H = Highland 

L = Lowland 

I = Intermediate 

H = Highland 

L/I/H = all altitudes 

A = Abundant 

C = Common 

R = Rare

Appendix 6. PERHILITAN Ecosystem Assessment for Peninsular Malaysia. 

An ecosystem assessment of 27 model ecological types in Peninsular Malaysia has been made by 

16 

PERHILITAN (DWNP, 2004) . This assessment examined the extent of the original area of the types that 

remained in 1992 (Figure 1) and also assessed the risk to the types based on the number of protected 

areas containing each type (Table 1). 

Legend 

thematic ecology types 

lowland forest 

lowland quartz 

lowland sandstone 

lowland limestone forest 

lowland ultrabasic forest 

riverine 

peat swamps 

alluvial lowland forest 

mangrove 

BRIS forest 

hill dipterocarp 

hill quartz forest 

hill sandstones 

hill limestone forest 

hill ultrbasic forest 

upper dipterocarp 

upper dipt quartz 

upper dipt sandstones 

upper dipt limestone 

oak-laurel 

oak-laurel quartz 

oak-laurel sandstone 

montone forest 

montone quartz 

montone sandstone 

Figure 1. Extent of Original and Current (c. 1992) Thematic Ecology Types in Peninsular Malaysia 

(DWNP, 2004). 

The Peninsular Malaysia Protected Areas Master Plan (Anon., 1999) sets a threshold of 10% of each 

ecosystem to be protected. It is therefore possible to use this threshold in combination with the PERHILITAN 

assessment in order to formulate an enhanced interpretation for HCV 3 in Peninsular Malaysia: 

“Threatened ecosystems” should be considered to be all forest types having less than 10% of its original 

area in a designated protected area AND not rated as being at “low risk of external threat” (i.e. not rated or 

rated at “high risk of external threat” due to having less than four replicants in totally protected areas): 

Table 1. Extent of Protection for each Ecological Type in Peninsular Malaysia. 

Ecological %PA Risk Status 

Marine alluvial 0% n/a HCV3 

Lowland dry ultrabasic 0% n/a HCV3 

Hill dipterocarp ultrabasic 0% n/a HCV3 

Montane quartz 0% High HCV3 

Montane sandstone 0% High HCV3 

BRIS forest 0% High HCV3 

Peat swamp 0% Low 

Mangrove 1% High HCV3 

Riverine 1% Low 

Lowland dry limestone 2% Low 

Burmese lowland forest 2% High HCV3 

Coastal forest 2% Low 

Hill dipterocarp quartz 3% High HCV3 

Lowland dry sandstone 5% Low 

Lowland dry neutral 5% Low 

Lowland dry quartz 7% High HCV3 

Ecological %PA Risk Status 

Oak-laurel neutral 9% Low 

Montane neutral 10% Low 

Oak-laurel sandstone 11% Low 

Hill dipterocarp sandstone 13% Low 

Upper dipterocarp neutral 15% Low 

Hill dipterocarp neutral 19% Low 

Upper dipterocarp sandstone 28% Low 

Upper dipterocarp quartz 38% High HCV3 

Hill dipterocarp limestone 49% High HCV3 

Oak-laurel quartz 95% High HCV3 

Upper dipterocarp limestone 99.8% High HCV3 

Note: ‘%PA’ – the percentage of the original area of each 

ecological type that was in a protected area in 2004 (type is 

endangered if %PA < 10%); ‘Risk’ – the risk of external threat to 

each ecological type covered by a protected area in terms of the 

number of protected areas existing that contain each ecological 

type (‘Low’ if n > 4); the column on ‘Status’ has been added. 

Source: DWNP (2004). 

16 

Similar assessments for ecosystems in Sabah and Sarawak could be made in future. Starting points include an 

unpublished ecological map produced by the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre; as well as the “Map of Sabah: Natural 

Forest Formation” (1:1,300,000) developed by the Forest Research Centre of the Sabah Forestry Department.

Appendix 7. Forest type classifications and assessments in Sabah. 

Figure 1. “Map of Sabah: Natural Forest Formation” (original scale was 1:1,300,000) (Anon., 2005: 27) 

Beach Forest 

Mangrove Forest 

Lowland Peat Swamp Forest 

Upland Peat Swamp Forest 

Lower Montane Peat Swamp Forest 

Lowland Seasonal Freshwater Swamp Forest 

Lowland Freshwater Swamp Forest 

Upland Freshwater Swamp Forest 

Lowland Mixed Dipterocarp Forest 

Upland Mixed Dipterocarp Forest 

Lowland Mixed Dipterocarp Forest & Limestone Vegetation 

Upland Mixed Dipterocarp Forest & Limestone Vegetation 

Lowland Mixed Dipterocarp & Kerangas Forest 

Upland Mixed Dipterocarp & Kerangas Forest 

Lowland Kerangas Forest 

Upland Kerangas Forest 

Lower Montane Kerangas Forest 

Upland Kerapah Forest 

Lowland Ultramafic Forest 

Upland Ultramafic Forest 

Lower Montane Ultramafic Forest 

Upper Montane Ultramafic Forest 

Lower Montane Forest 

Upper Montane Forest 

Sub-alpine Vegetation

Appendix 8. Forest type classifications and assessments in Sarawak. 

Coastal organic plains 

Inland organic plains 

Saline clay plains 

Lower river zone 

Upper riverine zone 

Undulating hilly sedimentary 

Igneous hilly mountainous 

Mountainous 

Dissectedarst 

Steep mountainous sedimentary 

Steep very high mountainous 

Freshwater 

Figure 1. Ecological zones in Sarawak 

Source: FAO (Anon., 2004) 

Note: Ecological zones correspond to natural vegetation: organic plains (coastal organic plains, inland 

organic plains) – peat swamp forest, marsh; saline clay plains – mangroves and mud-flats; riverine zones 

(lower riverine zone, upper riverine zone) – riverine forest; steep very high mountainous – alpine forest; 

other zones (undulating hilly sedimentary, igneous hilly mountainous, mountainous, dissected karst, steep 

mountainous sedimentary) – various classes of dry inland forest. 

Figure 2. Distribution of major forest types in Sarawak: Mangrove forest – purple; peat swamp forest – 

pink; mixed dipterocarp forest – green; secondary forest – yellow; land outside Sarawak – grey.

Appendix 9. Guide to identifying forest areas fundamental to meeting basic needs 

of local communities (HCV 5) and/or critical to local communities’ traditional cultural 

17 

identity (HCV 6) . 

The following four steps can be used as part of a facilitated participatory approach to identifying HCV 

5 and HCV 6 for a particular community. Facilitators should preferably have experience in Participatory 

Rural Appraisal (PRA), speak the local language and be accepted by the local communities. 

STEP 1: Identify sub-groups in each village based on their livelihood pattern 

Villages may comprise several sub-groups with different ethnic origins, livelihood patterns, age and gender. 

Before starting to identify the importance of forest values, facilitators need to divide each village into subgroups 

along the lines of Table 1. This information can be obtained by conducting a rapid appraisal to 

identify these key informants in order to avoid relying on a group whose views may be biased. 

Table 1 – Identification of sub-groups within one village community 

No. Ethnic group/origin Main sources of 

livelihood 

18 

Other key 

characteristics (e.g. 

history, location of 

dwelling, etc.) 

Approximate 

No. of 

Households 

% of village 

population 

Any group which belongs to indigenous groups and/or represents at least 15% of the village population 

should be considered as a significant sub-group and should be interviewed separately – either through 

individual interviews or through group interviews in which care is taken to make sure that only one subgroup 

is represented. 

Regarding gender, it is important to obtain the participation of women, since they usually have a different 

share in the resource use. Women may be more involved in the gathering of particular forest products, 

such as medicinal plants, and may then have a different perspective on how fundamental they are. In 

Malaysia, mixed gender group discussions tend to be dominated by men. In order to get an appropriate 

representation of women’s point of view, separate group discussions with women only can be organised. 

In such cases, the facilitator should be female. 

STEP 2: Identify how each sub-group meets its basic needs 

For each sub-group, Table 2 is proposed as a guide for individual or group interviews. The purpose of 

this table is to identify how each of the basic needs of the sub-group is met by different types of sources, 

including forest and alternative sources such as agriculture, the sea, the market, or aid by the government, 

forest company development programs or other third parties, such as NGOs. 

This table can be used in individual interviews. However, conducting such interviews can take a long time. 

It is more efficient in terms of time to use the table with small groups of villagers gathered for a group 

consultation. The ideal size would be between 5 to 15 people. About one hour should be enough to fill the 

table with a small group of participants (5 to 15). 

17 

18 

Adapted from ‘Identifying, Managing and Monitoring High Conservation Value Forests in Indonesia: A Toolkit for Forest 

Managers and other Stakeholders (2003). Available from www.hcvnetwork.org 

These tables are generic guides: local groups or researchers should modify the approach where appropriate.

Table 2 – Fulfillment of Basic Needs 

Village: Sub-Group (based on table 1): 

Needs 

Food: 

Carbohydrates 

(rice, sago…) 

Sources 

FOREST 

FMU 

Other 

Agriculture 

(non-forest 

land) 

Purchased 

Aid 

Other 

(e.g.sea) 

Explanation 

animal protein 

(meat, fish) 

fruits, vegetables 

Materials: 

housing 

boats 

furniture, 

household equipt, 

handicraft, tools… 

Fuel: 

Medicines: 

Water: 

for drinking and 

daily needs 

Cash income: 

Cultural/spiritual/ 

religious needs: 

Others: 

Table 2 can be reproduced on a large piece of paper and put up on display where the consultation is taking 

place. The facilitator then explains the purpose of the consultation and proceeds to ask villagers where 

they derive each of the main resources in the table below, and the respective importance of each source. 

For example, the facilitator will start asking the community what is their staple food, i.e. their main source 

of carbohydrate such as rice. Then they will ask them where they obtain it. Villagers will usually list the 

most important source first, and then other sources. For each source (for example: shifting cultivation), 

the facilitator then asks the villagers whether they derive all their rice from this source (ranking: 4); most 

of their needs from it (ranking : 3), a significant part of their needs (2), only a tiny, marginal part of their 

needs (ranking : 1), or none at all (0). In each cell, the facilitator then indicates its ranking from 0 to 4 as 

explained below, and list the corresponding resources, e.g. “river fish”, “well”, “rice”, “rattan”, etc. The 

determination of the importance of each source for each need is done using the following levels: 

• 4 - Essential = 100% of a given need is fulfilled by one source (for example, if all the water used 

by the community comes from the forest’s rivers, put “4 (all)” in the “forest” column in the 

“water” row). 

• 3 - Critical = more than 50% of a given need is fulfilled by one source 

• 2 - Important = between about 15% and 50% 

• 1 - Not important = less than 15% 

• 0 - Non existent = 0%

Not all the cells need to be filled, but at least all the ones with a value above 2 should be filled. Likewise, 

all cells in the column “forest” should be filled to make sure that the importance of the forest is carefully 

evaluated. Depending on the circumstances, the column “forest” can be split in two or not. If the group 

interviewed lives in the middle of the Forest Management Unit under evaluation, then everything they 

derive from the forest is likely to be from the FMU (unless they have migratory or hunting/ foraging 

patterns that go beyond the FMU’s borders). If the community is near the border of the FMU or often 

moves beyond its borders, then it may be necessary to clarify which percentage of their resources they 

draw from the FMU and which ones from another forest. 

It is important to realise that it is not necessary to ask the communities for percentages. If they are ready 

to give such percentages, they can be used to classify the importance of each resource in the categories 

0 to 4 above. However, it should be remembered that communities are not always used to keeping 

quantified records of their needs and resource uses, so percentage given during interviews can be very 

misleading. Rather than trying to obtain figures, which would require much more intensive data collecting, 

it is recommended to base the identification of fundamental resources on the qualitative perception of the 

people, which should be an adequate indicator. 

The levels 0 to 4 above can be obtained during individual or group discussions. In ordinary speech, the 

following could be used by farmers to qualify the importance of a source to fulfill a particular need, for 

example the following questions can be asked: “Do you get all your fruits from the forests or are there 

other sources?” if the answer is “all” then the level is 4 for the forest in the line “fruits”. If there are other 

sources, like for example a garden, then the question can be asked as such: “Do you get more fruits from 

the forest or from the garden?” if the answer is “more from the forest”, then the level is 3. If the answer 

is “more from the garden” then the following question can be asked: “Do you get a significant portion of 

fruits from the forest or just very little, seldom, and not in an important way?” If the answer is “significant, 

rather important” then the answer is 2, if the answer is “marginal, occasional, or not important” then the 

answer is 1. 

Some resources may become critical only at certain times of the year, or during crop failures, as 

replacement. For example, tubers collected in the forest may replace rice during shortages between two 

seasons. If the community qualifies a certain forest resource as marginal, always check that this applies 

all year long and all the time, for example by asking “are there certain times when this becomes more 

important?” If the answer is yes, then the importance of the resource should be moved to 2 (significant) 

and if there is no replacement during that period, then this resource meets the requirements for HCV 5. 

STEP 3: Identify fundamental forest functions 

For any need for which the forest has been ranked between 2 and 4 as a source (important, critical or 

essential), the consultation needs to be pursued more in detail by filling the Table 3 below, which will 

establish the readiness of alternatives and whether they are within the reach of the people.

Changes are important to consider. Communities’ livelihood patterns evolve. If a given resource from 

the forest is being used less and often replaced by alternatives, this may disqualify a resource as 

fundamental. This is especially true when people are investing in alternative sources, for example if they 

are developing cash crop plantations that will make them less dependant on forest produce for cash 

needs. This criterion is especially important for ‘ambiguous’ cases where it is difficult to decide whether a 

resource is fundamental or not. 

Questions in the table below will help to find out whether the resource is fundamental or not. It provides 

an indicator of whether the community has access to replacements to the forest resources or not. Each 

resource for which there is no access to satisfying replacement qualifies as HCV 5. 

Table 3 – Identifying fundamental forest resources 

Village: XXX………………. 

Resource (based on Table 2) 

(1.) If this need cannot be met from the corresponding 

forest resource, are there available alternatives? 

(2.) Are these alternatives available 

• all year long every year, 

• in sufficient quantities to replace 

the forest resources 

• and in an accessible location by 

available means of transportation 

(3.) Can the alternatives be obtained for free or would 

there be a cost involved? (e.g. cash needed to buy 

and transport a replacement, labour and land needed 

to start new agricultural activities?) 

(4.) Is the cost of alternatives within the reach of all 

the people? (e.g. do they have enough cash to buy it, 

or do they have enough labour and land to start new 

agricultural production as replacement?) 

(5.) Is there a trend of change in the dependency 

of the people over this resource? For example, are 

they less and less using the rivers for water, or is the 

collection of forest produce declining? 

If there is a trend of change, are the people investing 

in substitutes (e.g. developing cash crops, animal 

husbandry, etc.) 

Are they actively trying to protect the existing 

resources? 

Are all the members of the community concerned by 

these trends or just a minority? 

Sub-Group: (based on Table 1) … 

Ranking of importance of the forest in 

meeting this need (2 to 4), based on Table 2: 

List the alternatives here. If there are none, this 

resource is HCV 5. If there are alternatives, go 

to (2.) 

If the answer is no to one of these questions: 

there may be HCV 5. If the answer is yes to all 

questions, go to (3.) 

If the replacement is available for free (for 

example, free medicine at village dispensary), 

this is not HCV 5. If there is a cost, go to (4.). 

If no, then there is HCV 5; if yes, then the need 

is not fundamental. If there is ambiguity, go 

to (5.) 

In case of hesitation over the importance of 

a resource, obvious declining trends in the 

use of the forest, affecting the community as 

a whole may disqualify the forest from being 

considered as fundamental, especially if 

people are actively investing in new, alternative 

resources such as agriculture. 

If the community is actively protecting the 

forest resources, then it is HCV 5. 

If the forest is fundamental in meeting at least one of the basic needs, this is sufficient to qualify the forest 

as HCVF under HCV 5.

STEP 4: Identify areas of critical traditional cultural, ecological, economic or religious 

significance (HCV 6) 

If a community has been using a forest area for more than two generations then the area is of potential 

traditional cultural value. The economic and cultural values identified in Table 2, above, therefore can 

therefore be linked with forest areas that are potentially HCV 6. A specific set of interview questions are 

needed to determine whether these economic (i.e. sources of income) and cultural (e.g. religious) values 

have formed a central role for the community over at least two generations. This information could be 

tabulated along the lines laid out in Table 4, below. 

Table 4 – Identifying areas of critical traditional cultural significance 

Village: XXX………………. 

Resource (based on Table 2) 

Sub-Group: (based on Table 1) … 

Number of generations the 

resource has been used 

Ranking of importance of the 

resource to the community 

over the last two generations 

(Rank 2/3/4) 

Economic resources: 

… 

Cultural/religious resources: 

… 

Resources that have been used for more than two generations and have consistently ranked as critical 

(3) or essential (4) over this time qualify as HCV 6.

Appendix 11. Relevant organisations to contact. 

Government agencies 

Department of Irrigation & Drainage 

Jalan Sultan Salahuddin 

50626 Kuala Lumpur 

Tel 03-2697-2828 

Fax 03-2698-7973 

Email pro@water.gov.my 

www.water.gov.my 

Department of Town & Country Planning 

Peninsular Malaysia 

Jalan Cenderasari 


Tel 03-2698-9211 

Fax 03-2698-9994 

www.townplan.gov.my 

Economic Planning Unit 

Prime Minister’s Department 

Block B5 & B6 

Federal Government Administrative Centre 

62502 Putrajaya 

Tel 03-8888-33333 

Fax 03-8888-3755 

www.epu.jpm.my 

Department of Orang Asli Affairs Malaysia 

Level 10, 20 & 20M, West Block 

Wisma Selangor Dredging 

142-C Jalan Ampang 


Tel 03-2161-0577 

Fax 03-2162-1470 

www.jheoa.gov.my 

Department of Wildlife & National Parks 

(PERHILITAN) 

KM 10, Jalan Cheras 


Tel 03-9075-2872 

Fax 03-9075-2873 

www.wildlife.gov.my 

Forest Department Peninsular Malaysia 

Jalan Sultan Salahuddin 


Tel 03-2616-4488 

Fax 03-2692-5657 

www.forestry.gov.my 

Johor National Parks Corporation (JNPC) 

JKR 475, Jalan Bukit Timbalan 

80000 Johor Bahru, Johor 

Tel 07-223-7471 / 224-2525 

Fax 07-223-7472 

Email jnpc@johorparks.com 

www.johorparks.com.my 

Minerals & Geoscience Department Malaysia 

19th-22nd Floor, Bangunan Tabung Haji 

Jalan Tun Razak 


Tel 03-2161-1033 

Fax 03-2161-1036 

www.jmg.gov.my 

Malaysian Meteorological Department 

Jalan Sultan 

Petaling Jaya, Selangor 

Tel 03-7967-8000 

Fax 03-7955-0964 

Email email@met.gov.my 

www.met.gov.my 

Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment 

Wisma Sumber Asli 

25 Persiaran Perdana 

Precint 4, 62574 Putrajaya 

Tel 03-8886-1111 

Fax 03-8886-1512 

www.nre.gov.my 

Perak State Parks Corporation (PSPC) / 

Perbadanan Taman Negeri Perak 

Kompleks Pejabat Kerajaan Negeri 

Daerah Hulu Perak 

33000 Gerik, Perak 

Tel 05-791-4543 

Fax 05-791-2641

Sabah 

Bornean Biodiversity & Ecosystems 

Conservation Programme Phase II (BBEC II) 

c/o Natural Resources Office 

14th Floor, Menara Tun Mustapha 

88502 Kota Kinabalu 

WDT 235, 88902 Kota Kinabalu 

Tel 088-422-120 

Fax 088-422-129 

Email bbec@sabah.gov.my 

www.bbec.sabah.gov.my 

Environment Protection Department 

Wisma Budaya, 1-3 Floor 

Tunku Abdul Rahman Road 

Locked Bag No. 2078 


Tel 088-251-290 

Fax 088-238-120 

Email jpas@sabah.gov.my 

www.sabah.gov.my/jpas/ 

Sabah Museum 

Locked Bag 2015 


Tel 088-253199 

Fax 088-240-230 

Email Muzium.Sabah@sabah.gov.my 

www.mzm.sabah.gov.my 

Sabah Cultural Board 

Wisma Budaya Building 

Tunku Abdul Rahman Road 



Tel 088-268-890 

Fax 088-264-235 

Email borneosiff@gmail.com 

www.sabah.gov.my/lks/ 

Sabah Wildlife Department 

5th Floor, B Block, Wisma MUIS 


Tel 088-215-353 

Fax 088-222-476 

Email jhlsabah@tm.net.my 

OR pengarah.jhl@tm.net.my 

www.sabah.gov.my/jhl/ 

Department of Irrigation & Drainage 

Level 5, Wisma Pertanian Sabah 

Jalan Tasik Luyang 

Off Jalan Maktab Gaya 



Tel 088-280-500 

Fax 088-242-770 

www.did.sabah.gov.my 

Forest Research Centre 

Sabah Forestry Department 

P.O. Box 1407 

90715 Sandakan 

Tel 089-531-522/3/4 

Fax 089-531-068 

Email frcsabah@sabah.gov.my 

OR frc@tm.net.my 

www.sabah.gov.my/htan_frc/ 

Sabah Agricultural Park 

WDT 28 

89909 Tenom 

Tel 087-737-952 

Fax 087-737-571 

Email agripark@sabah.net.my 

www.sabah.net.my/agripark/home.htm 

Sabah Parks 

Lot 1-3, Block K, G Floor 

Sinsuran Complex 

P.O. Box 10626 


Tel 088-211-881/212-719 

Fax 088-221-001 / 088-211-585 

Email sparkshq@tm.net.my 

www.sabahparks.org.my 

Sabah Forestry Department 

KM 10, Labuk Road 

Locked Bag 68 

90009 Sandakan 

Tel 089-660-811/660-125/660-824 

Fax 089-669-170 

Email htan@sabah.gov.my 

www.forest.sabah.gov.my 

Pejabat Hal-Ehwal Anak Negeri Sabah 

Level 2 Block C 

Wisma Tun Fuad Stephens 



Email PHEAN@sabah.gov.my 

Tel 088-222-251 

Fax 088-246-352

Sarawak 

Natural Resources & Environment Board 

18th-20th Floor Menara Pelita 

Jalan Tun Abdul Rahman Ya’akub 

Petra Jaya, 93050 Kuching 

Tel 082-440-504 

Fax 082-312-800 

Email penguangm@sarawaknet.gov.my 

www.nreb.gov.my 

Sarawak Biodiversity Centre 

KM 20, Jalan Borneo Heights 

Semenggoh 


93990 Kuching 

Tel 082-610-610 

Fax 082-611-535 

Email biosar@sbc.org.my 

www.sbc.org.my 

Forest Department Sarawak 

Wisma Sumber Alam 

Jalan Stadium 

Petra Jaya, 93660 Kuching 

Tel 082-442-180 

Fax 082-441-210 

Email lth@sarawaknet.gov.my 

www.forestry.sarawak.gov.my/forweb/ homepage. 

htm 

Sarawak Forestry Corporation (SFC) 

Lot 218, KCLD 

Jalan Tapang, Kota Sentosa 

93250 Kuching, Sarawak 

Tel 082-610-088 

Fax 082-610-099 

Email info@sarawakforestry.com 

www.sarawakforestry.com 

Sarawak Health Department 

Jalan Tun Abang Haji Openg 

93590 Kuching 

Tel 082-256-566 

Fax 082-424-959 

Email shd@sarawak.health.gov.my 

www.sarawak.health.gov.my/index2.htm 

Sarawak Rivers Board 

Level 3, Electra House 

Power Street 

93000 Kuching 

Tel 082-207-107/110 

Fax 082-242-197 

Email muhamayk@sarawaknet.gov.my 

www.srb.sarawak.gov.my 

Sarawak Native Customs Council 

Level 3, Bangunan BINAMAS 

Lot 138, Section 54, Jalan Padungan 

93400 Kuching 

Tel 082-234-719 

Fax 082-234-730 

Email ambrosld@sarawaknet.gov.my 

www.nativecustoms.sarawak.gov.my 

Sarawak Water Resources Council 

Public Works Department Headquarters 

Wisma Saberkas 

93582 Kuching 

Tel 082-203-100/8 

Fax 082-429-679 / 429-789

Academic/Research institutions 

Forest Research Insitute Malaysia (FRIM) 

52109 Kepong 

Selangor 

Tel 03-6279-7000 

Fax 03-6273-1314 

www.frim.gov.my 

Universiti Malaya (UM) 


Tel 03-7967-7022/3273 

Fax 03-7956-0027 

Email icr@um.edu.my 

www.um.edu.my 

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) 

Jalan Datuk Mohd Musa 

94300 Kota Samarahan 

Sarawak 

Tel 082-581-000/388 

Fax 082-665-088 

www.unimas.my 

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) 

43600 Bangi 

Selangor 

Tel 03-8921-5555 

www.ukm.my 

Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) 



Sabah 

Tel 088-320-000/474 

Fax 088-320-223 

Email crd@ums.edu.my 

www.ums.edu.my 

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) 

43400 Serdang 

Selangor 

Tel 03-8946-6000 

Fax 03-8948-7273 

www.upm.edu.my 

Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) 

11800 Pulau Pinang 

Tel 04-653-3140 

Fax 04-658-9666 

Email pro@notes.usm.my 

www.usm.my

NGOs/Private 

Borneo Resources Institute (BRIMAS) 

Lot 1046, 2nd Floor 

Shang Garden Shoplots 

Jalan Bulan Sabit 

98000 Miri, Sarawak 

Email snanet@tm.net.my 

brimas.www1.50megs.com 

HUTAN-Kinabatangan Orang-utan 

Conservation Project 

P.O. Box 10035 

88800 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 

Tel 088-244-502 

Fax 088-244-502 

Email hutan1@tm.net.my 

www.hutan.org.my 

Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) 

JKR 641 Jalan Kelantan 

Bukit Persekutuan 


Tel 03-2287-9422 

Fax 03-2287-8773 

Email mns@mns.org.my 

www.mns.org.my 

Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Malaysia 

7 Jalan Ridgeway 

93200 Kuching, Sarawak 

Tel 082-279-050 

Fax 082-252-799 

OR 

42-C, 3rd Floor 

Jalan SS6/8, Kelana Jaya 

47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor 

Tel 03-7880-2029 

Fax 03-7880-2058 

Email admin@wcsmalaysia.org 

OR wcsmy@streamyx.com 

www.wcsmalaysia.org 

Center for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC) 

P.O. Box 3052 

47590 Subang Jaya 

Selangor 

Tel 03-5632-8050 

Email colin.coac@gmail.com 

www.coac.org.my 

Kadazandusun Cultural Association Sabah 

(KDCA) 

Hongkod Koisaan 

KM 7, Penampang Road 

WDT 39 

89509 Penampang, Sabah 

Tel 088-713-696 

Fax 088-713-350 

Email koisaan@kdca.org.my 

www.kdca.org.my 

Partners of Community Organisations 

(PACOS) 

First Floor, Lot 5 

Block M, Donggongon Town 

P.O. Box 511 

89507 Penampang, Sabah 

Tel 088-712-518 

Fax 088-718-669 

Email pacos@tm.net.my 

www.sabah.net.my/PACOS/ 

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Malaysia 

49 Jalan SS23/11 

Taman SEA 

47400 Petaling Jaya 

Selangor 

Tel 03-7803-3772 

Fax 03-7803-5157 

Email contactus@wwf.org.my 

www.wwf.org.my 

Sabah Environmental Protection Association 

(SEPA) 

Email sepa94@tm.net.my 

www.sabah.org.my/sepa/

Appendix 12. List of participants in expert review 27-28 May 2008. 

No. Name Organisation 

1. Dr Lilian Chua Swee Lian Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) 

2. Dr Sanath Kumaran KENVIRO 

3. Mr Yong Teng Koon Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC) 

4. Mr Mohd Zin Yusop Pahang Forestry Department 

5. Tn Hj Sapuan Ahmad Forest Department Sarawak 

6. Ms Lucy Chong Sarawak Forestry Corporation (SFC) 

7. Dr Lee Hua Seng Sarawak Timber Association (STA) 

8. Prof Zubaid Akbar Mukhtar Ahmad Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) 

9. Dr Melvin Gumal Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Malaysia 

10. Mr Ahmad Zafir Abdul Wahab WWF-Malaysia 

11. Ms Ivy Wong WWF-Malaysia 

12. Mr Reuben Clements WWF-Malaysia 

13. Mr Surin Suksuwan WWF-Malaysia 

14. Ms Patricia Regis Independent consultant 

15. Mr Lim Teck Wyn (Facilitator) RESCU 

16. Ms Sheema Abdul Aziz (Rapporteur) WWF-Malaysia

Appendix 13. List of participants in stakeholder consultations. 

Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 20 November 2008 


1. Prof Ashari Muktar Idris Hydraulic 

2. Mr Joly Poyonk Benta Wawasan 

3. Mr Stephen Chaw Sabah Timber Industries Association 

4. Ms Priscilla Pipin Sabah Timber Industries Association 

5. Mr David Chieng Lee Kie KTS Plantation 

6. Mr Kelvin Hong Sian Kai KTS Plantation 

7. Mr Wayne Wooff Sabah Forest Industries 

8. Mr Junex Topher Maing Sabah Forest Industries 

9. Mr Joannes V. Lojiu Rakyat Berjaya 

10. Mr Bernard L. Daim Inspiration Furniture 

11. Ms Linda E. Giyung Sabah Forestry Department 

12. Mrs Rosila Anthony Sabah Forestry Department 

13. Mr Julsun Sukui Sabah Forestry Department 

14. Mr Robert Martin Mijol Sabah Forestry Department 

15. Dr John Tay Universiti Malaysia Sabah 

16. Pn Rahimah Ahmad Environment Protection Department 

17. Mr Jasper Sabah Museum 

18. Ms Darline Hasegawa Yayasan Sabah 

19. Dr Benedict Topin Kadazandusun Cultural Association (KDCA) 

20. Ms Maimee Scott The Sabah Society 

21. Ms Kertijah Abd Kadir WWF-Malaysia 

22. Ms Jayashree Kanniah WWF-Malaysia 

23. Mr Raymond Alfred WWF-Malaysia 

24. Ms Rashidah Maqbool WWF-Malaysia 

25. Ms Audrey Lee Mei Fong WWF-Malaysia 

26. Ms Ivy Wong (Facilitator) WWF-Malaysia 

27. Ms Sheema Abdul Aziz (Facilitator) WWF-Malaysia

Petaling Jaya, Selangor, 13 January 2009 


1. Mr Nordin Unoss Kumpulan Pengurusan Kayu-Kayan Terengganu 

(KPKKT) 

2. Mr Mohd Adnan Ali KPKKT 

3. Mr Mohd Hakimi Abu Hassan KPKKT 

4. Ms Ummi Ainul Hafizah Mohd Ismail Ali KPKKT 

5. Mr Yong Teng Koon Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC) 

6. Mr Mohd Faisal Jaafar MTCC 

7. Mr Abdul Razak Mohd Perak Integrated Timber Complex (PITC) 

8. Mr Shahidin Ahmad Juffiry PITC 

9. Mr Mohd Fakhrurazi Mustafha PITC 

10. Mr Vijender Persad Forest Plantation Development 

11. Ms Aimie Aiza Mohd Tusin Forest Plantation Development 

12. Dr Hj Kamaruzzaman Jusoff Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) 

13. Dr Faridah Hanum Ibrahim UPM 

14. Dr Mohamed Zakaria Hussin UPM 

15. Ms Mona Nazeri UPM 

16. Mr Nima Madani UPM 

17. Prof Abu Hassan Ahmad Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) 

18. Prof Zubaid Akbar Mukhtar Ahmad Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) 

19. Mr Zaharil Dzulkafly Dept of Wildlife & National Parks (DWNP/ 

PERHILITAN) Kelantan 

20. Mr Rosaizan Haryani Rosli Forestry Dept Peninsular Malaysia (FDPM/ JPSM) 

21. Mr Lim K.L. JPSM 

22. Mr Helmy Tariq Othman Pahang Forestry Dept 

23. Dr Lilian Chua Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) 

24. Mr Salim Aman Perak Forestry Dept 

25. Mr Mohd Ridzuwan Endot Johor Forestry Dept 

26. Ms Hashida Hamdan Dept of Irrigation & Drainage 

27. Mr Wan Abd Hamid Shukri Abd Rahman Selangor Forestry Dept 

28. Mr Mohamad Hafid Rohani PERHILITAN Selangor 

29. Mr Abd Kadir Hashim PERHILITAN (HQ) 

30. Mr Hasdi Hassan PERHILITAN 

31. Ms Teresa Ong Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) 

32. Dr Sanath Kumaran KENVIRO 

33. Mr Zuhairi Tajudin Independent 

34. Ms Rejani Kunjappan WWF-Malaysia 

35. Mr Surin Suksuwan WWF-Malaysia 

36. Mr Reuben Clements WWF-Malaysia 





Final Workshop, Kuala Lumpur, 29 June 2009 


1. Dr Vengeta Rao Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) 

2. Chang Kwong Choong RSPO 

3. Mr Azizan Juhin Grand Perfect 

4. Mr Joanes Unggang Grand Perfect 

5. Mr Dickson John Timban Grand Perfect 

6. Chai Kam Ching Malaysian Timber Council (MTC) 

7. Mr Joly Poyong Benta Wawasan 

8. Dr K. Ramadasan Malaysian Palm Oil Association (MPOA) 

9. Mr Selwendran TSH Resources 

10. Ms Hazaedawati Baharuddin Forest Plantation Development 

11. Ms Puteri Arlydia Abdul Forest Plantation Development 

12. Mr Yong Teng Koon MTCC 

13. Mr Faisal Jaafar MTCC 

14. Mr Hii Sii Yiew Jaya Tiasa 

15. Mr Lim Choon Yang KTS Resources 

16. Mr Henry Kong Chee Phin Samling Strategic Corporation 

17. Mr Andy Wong Ko Hock Shin Yang Forestry 

18. Mr Nicholas Ting Kang Hwa Ta Ann Holdings 

19. Mr Peter Ling Kwong Hung WTK Organisation 

20. Mr Wong Ing Yung Zedtee 

21. Dr Lee Hua Seng STA 

22. Ms Jenny Chen STA 

23. Ms Jaime Chan STA 

24. Mr Nordin Unoss KPKKT 

25. Ms Ummi Ainul Hafizah Mohd Ismail Ali KPKKT 

26. Ms Cally Beamish Wilmar International 

27. Mr Frank Salazar Sabah Softwoods 

28. Mr Dominic Dambul Sabah Softwoods 

29. Mr Richard Teng King Huat Subur Tiasa 

30. Ms Wan Sabariah Mohd Noor Asiaprima RCF 

31. Dr Mohamed Zakaria Hussin UPM 

32. Dr Rozainah M. Zakaria Universiti Malaya (UM) 

33. Prof Zubaid Akbar UKM 

34. Dr Lilian Chua FRIM 

35. Mr Helmy Tariq Othman Pahang Forestry Dept 

36. Mr Jalil Md Som Pahang Forestry Dept 

37. Mr Jammy Gabriel Sabah Environment Protection Dept 

38. Mr Radhi Chu Abdullah Terengganu Forestry Dept 

39. Mr Sulaiman Nasrudin Sarawak Land & Survey Dept 

40. Ms Lucy Chong SFC

Final Workshop, Kuala Lumpur, 29 June 2009 


41. Tn Hj Zolkipli bin Mohamad Aton SFC 

42. Mr Paulus Meleng Forest Dept Sarawak 

43. Dr Robert C. Ong Sabah Forestry Dept 

44. Mr Ricky Martin Sabah Forestry Dept 

45. Mr Zaharil Dzulkafly PERHILITAN Kelantan 

46. Mr Muhammad Hafni Ahmad Saraji Kedah Forestry Dept 

47. Mr Mohd Fauzi Abu Bakar Johor Forestry Dept 

48. Mr Mohammad Khairi Ahmad PERHILITAN Selangor 

49. Mr Salim Aman Perak Forestry Dept 

50. Mr Hamidi Abd Halim FDPM 

51. Mr Mohd Zin Yusop FDPM 

52. Mr Mohd Rahim Rani FDPM 

53. Mr Lim Kee Leng FDPM 

54. Tn Hj Abdul Khalim Hj Abu Samah Kelantan Forestry Dept 

55. Ms Perpetua George ProForest 

56. Mr Kevin Grace Global Forestry Services (GFS) 

57. Ms Jessie Ooi Guek Cheng GFS 

58. Mr Elbsom Marajan Mesra Alam Consulting 

59. Mr Lawrence Ng SGS Malaysia 

60. Mr Lee Kian Foh Green Spider 

61. Mr Noah Jackson Green Spider 

62. Mr Lesly Leon Lee Forest Voices 

63. Ms Harjinder Kler HUTAN 

64. Ms Kanitha Krishnasamy MNS 

65. Dr Melvin Gumal WCS Malaysia 

66. Mr Jason Hon WCS Malaysia 

67. Mr Mark Rayan Darmaraj WWF-Malaysia 





Non-participants who provided written/verbal comments/input: 


1. Dr Geoffrey Davison National Parks Board, Singapore 

2. Dr Lim Hin Fui FRIM 

3. Mr Khoo Kay Jin Independent consultant 

4. Ms Joan T. Pereira Sabah Forestry Dept 

5. Dr Henry Chan SFC 

6. Dr Junaidi Payne WWF-Malaysia 

7. Mr Darrel Webber WWF-Malaysia 

8. Mr Conrad E. Savy Conservation International

Appendix 14. Mammal Tracks of Thailand. 

PICTORIAL REFERENCE TO TRACKS OF HOOFED ANIMALS (Not to scale) 

Rujukan Bergambar untuk Tapak Kaki Haiwan Berkuku (Tidak mengikut skala)

No. 

Name of animal (Nama haiwan) 

Inggeris / saintifik / Bahasa Malaysia (English / scientific / Malay) 

1(a) & (b) Common barking deer / Muntiacus muntjak / Kijang 

2 (a) & (b) Common wild pig / Sus scrofa / Babi hutan 

3 (a) & (b) Serow / Capricornis sumatraensis / Kambing gurun 

4 (a) & (b) Sambar deer / Cervus unicolor / Rusa 

5 Water buffalo / Bubalus bubalis / Kerbau 

6 (a) & (b) Lesser mouse deer / Tingulus javanicus / Kancil 

7 (a) & (b) Sumatran rhinoceros / Dicerorhinus sumatrensis / Badak sumbu 

8 Banteng / Bos javanicus / Banteng 

9 Gaur / Bos gaurus / Seladang 

10 (a) & (b) Tapir / Tapirus indicus / Tenuk atau Cipan 

11 (a) & (b) Elephant / Elephas maximus / Gajah

PICTORIAL REFERENCE TO TRACKS OF PAWED ANIMALS (Not to scale) 

Rujukan Bergambar untuk Tapak Kaki Haiwan Berkuku (Tidak mengikut skala)

No. 

Name of animal (Nama haiwan) 

Inggeris / saintifik / Bahasa Malaysia (English / scientific / Malay) 

1 (a) & (b) Yellow-throated marten / Martes flavigula / Pulasan 

2 (a) & (b) Malayan porcupine / Hystrix brachyura / Landak raya 

3 Eurasian otter / Lutra lutra / Memerang 

4 Smooth-coated otter / Lutra perspicillata / Memerang 

5 (a) & (b) Burmese ferret badger / Melogale personata 

6 (a) & (b) Hare / Lepus sp. / Arnab 

7 (a) & (b) Malayan pangolin / Manis javanica / Tenggiling 

8 Small-clawed otter / Aonyx cinerea / Memerang 

9 Long-tailed macaque / Macaca fascicularis / Kera 

10 (a) & (b) Large bamboo rat / Rhizomys sumatrensis / Dekan 

11 (a) & (b) Brush-tailed porcupine / Atherurus macrourus / Landak batu 

12 (a) & (b) Bay bamboo rat / Cannomys badius / Dekan 

13 Rat / Rattus sp. / Tikus 

14 (a) & (b) Large Indian civet / Viverra zibetha / Musang Jebat 

15 Masked palm civet / Paguma larvata / Musang 

16 Hog badger / Arctonyx collaris 

17 Javan mongoose / Herpestes javanicus / Tikus mondok 

18 Moonrat / Echinosorex gymnurus / Tikus bulan 

19 Otter civet / Cynogale benetti / Musang 

20 Common palm civet / Paradoxurus hermaphroditus / Musang 

21 Small Indian civet / Viverricula indica / Musang 

22 Binturong / Arctictis binturong / Binturong 

23 Asiatic wild dog / Cuon alpinus / Anjing hutan 

24 Three-striped ground squirrel / Lariscus insignis / Tupai 

25 Malayan weasel / Mustela nudipes / Jelu 

26 Fishing cat / Prionailurus viverrinus / Kucing hutan 

27 Tiger / Panthera tigris / Harimau 

28 Asiatic black bear / Ursus thibetanus / Beruang 

Source: Kanjanavanit (1997).

WWF-Malaysia, the national conservation trust, is committed to safeguarding our 

country’s natural resources and unique wildlife for all Malaysians. Since 1972, 

WWF-Malaysia has worked on important conservation projects, from saving 

endangered species such as tigers and turtles, to protecting our highland forests, 

rivers and seas. 

WWF-Malaysia is able to leverage upon conservation expertise world wide as part 

of WWF, the global conservation organisation that has almost 5 million supporters 

and activities in more than 90 countries. 

WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the natural environment and to build 

a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: 

• Conserving the world’s biological diversity 

• Ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable 

• Promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful exploitation consumption 

WWF-Malaysia 

Tabung Alam Malaysia 

49 Jalan SS23/15 

Taman SEA 

47301 Petaling Jaya 

Selangor, Malaysia 

Tel: ++ (603) 7803 3772 

Fax: ++ (603) 7803 5157 

Email: wwfmal@wwf.org.my 

Website: www.wwf.org.my 

Donations are tax-deductible 

under Malaysian law 

© 2009, WWF-Malaysia. ® WWF Registered Trademark owner.

(HCVF) Toolkit for Malaysia - HCV Resource Network

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?