Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to key eventsSkip to navigation

Mark Rylance webchat – your questions answered on hats, Shakespeare and Steven Spielberg

This article is more than 7 years old

The Oscar-winning star discussed everything from role preparation to his love for Neil Young and PJ Harvey in our live webchat

 Updated 
Wed 16 Nov 2016 07.55 ESTFirst published on Mon 14 Nov 2016 09.41 EST
Friendly giant ... Mark Rylance in Cannes earlier this year.
Friendly giant ... Mark Rylance in Cannes earlier this year. Photograph: Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images
Friendly giant ... Mark Rylance in Cannes earlier this year. Photograph: Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images

Live feed

Key events

BushfireBilly asks:

Why do you always seem to be wearing a hat when not in role?

I've always liked hats, since I was a teenager, and they used to be such wonderful hats in vintage clothes stores in the 70s and 80s, some of which I still have. When I took the job at the Globe theatre, and had to do a lot more media work, I wanted to distinguish between when I was speaking as an actor, and as an artistic director. Now, I've just become fond of wearing hats, and of course, as I lose my hair, they keep me warmer and comfort my wounded vanity. I saw Maggie Smith recently - and this is great example of her wondrous talent - and she said: "What's with the hat? Is it because you're losing your hair?" And there is some truth to that now. But my love of hats began before I started to lose my hair.

Simother asks:

How do you look back on the movie Intimacy and why did you choose to do it?

Intimacy was the most difficult job I've ever had. Hanif Kureishi's work and Patrice Chereau's words convinced me it was a very true and vital story about the difficulties people face finding intimacy in a big city like London. I know Hanif Kureishi's writing couldn't have been more intimate and revealing, but I found the making of the film and the subsequent publicity and personal attacks very, very painful. And I wish I hadn't made it.

Share
Updated at 

ID304567 asks:

Stanislavski said that the elements of good acting are simpler, higher, funnier and lighter. I have seen these elements pumped up in a lot of characters you portrayed on stage, like the Rooster, Richard III and King Philippe V. Is this something you do on purpose or just a coincidence?

Share
Updated at 

'I need more sensation than film can provide for me. The theatre is such a thrill'

Jo Allan asks:

I was just wondering how you’d found the transition from theatre to film and back. Do you feel like they require different parts of your self to get to the same end? Thank you.

Thank you. They are very different, and require different skills. Not necessarily different skills of acting, but different skills around the acting that you do in both. I fear that ultimately I need more sensation and activity than film can provide for me. The theatre is such a thrill for me.

Share
Updated at 

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed