Next Article in Journal
Integrated Approach in Genomic Selection to Accelerate Genetic Gain in Sugarcane
Next Article in Special Issue
Anthracnose Disease Control and Postharvest Quality of Hass Avocado Stored in Biobased PLA/PBAT/Pine Essential Oil/Chitosan Active Packaging Nets
Previous Article in Journal
The Synergistic Effects of Curcumin and Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Inhibiting Metastatic, Invasive and Proliferative Pathways
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Ethanolic Powdered Extract of Magnolia tamaulipana Vazquez against Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 16
10.3390/plants11162138
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nematicidal Screening of Aqueous Extracts from Plants of the Yucatan Peninsula and Ecotoxicity

by
Jesús Aviles-Gomez
1,
Jairo Cristóbal-Alejo
2,*,
María Fé Andrés
3,
Azucena González-Coloma
3,
Germán Carnevali
1,
Daisy Pérez-Brito
1,
Felicia Amalia Moo-Koh
1 and
Marcela Gamboa-Angulo
1,*
1
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida 97205, Mexico
2
Tecnológico Nacional de México, Campus Conkal, Conkal 97345, Mexico
3
Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(16), 2138; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162138
Submission received: 10 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 17 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts as Biological Protective Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Active metabolites from plants are considered safer than synthetic chemicals for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne. In the present work, 75 aqueous extracts (AEs) from different vegetative parts of 34 native plant species of the Yucatan Peninsula were evaluated against second-stage juveniles (J2s) of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica in microdilution assays. The highest mortality (M) against both Meloidogyne species was produced by the foliar AE from Alseis yucatanensis (M ≥ 94%) and Helicteres baruensis (M ≥ 77%) at 3% w/v after 72 h. Other active AEs at 3% were from the leaves of Croton itzaeus and stems of H. baruensis (M: 87–90%) on M. javanica and the stems of Annona primigenia and the leaves of Morella cerifera on M. incognita (M: 92–97%). The AEs from A. yucatanensis had the lowest LD50 against M. incognita (0.36% w/v), and against M. javanica (3.80% w/v). In an acute ecotoxicity assay of the most promising AEs using non-target earthworms (Eisenia fetida), the AE of A. yucatanensis had slight acute toxicity (LD50: 2.80% w/v), and the rest of the most active AEs were not ecotoxic. These tropical plants are potential candidates for further studies as biorational agents for controlling Meloidogyne species.

1. Introduction

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause 8.8–14% of the annual crop losses worldwide, at an estimated cost of approximately USD 173 billion [1,2]. Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are one of the groups (Meloidogyne sp.) with the highest pathogenic capacity and the greatest number of hosts. Of the 105 described species in the genus Meloidogyne, M. arenaria, M. hapla, M. incognita, and M. javanica in particular parasitize many important crops [2,3,4]. These RKN species attack the root vascular system, causing water and nutrient transport deficiencies, wilting and chlorosis, retarding plant growth, and reducing yields [5,6]. In addition, they suppress the host defense system, making plants more susceptible to other plant pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses [7,8].
Meloidogyne has been controlled using agronomic practices such as fallow, crop rotation, resistant varieties, and mainly by synthetic chemical nematicides [9]. However, the use of synthetic nematicides such as methyl bromide, 1,3-dichloropropene, carbamates (oxamyl), and organophosphates (fenamiphos), among others, is being restricted because of their high toxicity [10,11]. Requirements for low or no residual synthetic pesticides in the food chain have led to an increased demand to use alternatives with low or no toxicity [9,12]. Plant extracts or their metabolites have been shown to have nematicidal activity [13,14]. For example, the aqueous extracts (AEs) of Azadirachta indica [15], Taxus baccata [16], and Xanthium strumarium [17] cause high mortality to M. incognita, and the AEs of Crambe abyssinica, Cuminum cyminum, Curcuma longa, Nigella sativa, and Piper nigrum and have lethal effects against M. javanica [18,19].
However, studies that focus on the ecotoxicity of natural pesticides are scarce [20,21]. Earthworms (Eisenia fetida) are used as a bioindicator to evaluate the acute and chronic toxicity of synthetic or natural products because they are one of the most common soil species [22]. The assays using these organisms can be indicative of short-term effects and possible long-term damage and thus help to prevent harmful impacts on the environment and humans [20]. For example, the nematicidal hydrolate fraction obtained from Lavandula luisieri was slightly toxic to E. fetida [21], while fraction F6 from Couroupita guianensis was not toxic [23].
Harboring 23,314 species of vascular plants among 2854 genera and 297 families, Mexico occupies fourth place in the world for its floral diversity [24]. However, few of these plant species have been surveyed so far. Of those surveyed, 37 have been detected with nematicidal properties against plant and animal parasitic nematodes [25]. In the continuing search for natural alternatives among the biodiversity of Southern and Southeastern Mexico, a working group has screened 20 species from the region against various phytopathogens. Aqueous extracts (AEs) of the leaves and roots of Calea urticifolia and an ethanol extract of the leaves of Eugenia winzerlingii had high activity against Meloidogyne incognita and/or M. javanica [26,27,28]. Such bioprospecting for natural nematicidal agents must therefore be intensified.
In the present research, we evaluated AEs from 34 plant species from the Yucatan Peninsula (Table 1) against second-stage juveniles (J2s) of M. incognita and M. javanica. The most effective AEs against both nematodes were assayed against adults of the earthworm E. fetida and in a serial dilution to calculate their median and 90 lethal doses against the targets.

2. Results

2.1. Nematicidal Activity of Aqueous Extracts

Among 75 AEs, from different plant parts of 34 plant species, tested against the J2s of M. incognita at 6% (w/v) concentration, 28 induced high mortality (≥90%) at 72 h of exposure (Table 2). Among these, eight AEs were lethal (M of 100%) against M. incognita: Alseis yucatanensis leaves (L), Annona primigenia stem (S), Hybantus yucatanensis (L, S), Macroscepis diademata (S), Randia aculeata (L, roots (R)), and the entire plant of Calea jamaicensis. At 3% (w/v), 17 AEs caused mortality >75% against M. incognita. These active AEs included A. yucatanensis (L), Alvaradoa amorphoides (R), A. primigenia (S), Chrysophylun mexicanum (R), Diospyros sp. (L), Eugenia sp. (L), Helicteres baruensis (L), H. yucatanensis (S), M. diademata (L), Malpighia glabra (R), Morella cerifera, (L), Piper neesianum (L, R), Randia aculeata (L), and the complete plant of C. jamaicensis, Euphorbia armourii, and Ipomoea clavata (Table 2).
In the nematicidal evaluation of the AEs at 6% (w/v) against the J2s of M. javanica, one plant part from seven plant species and two plant parts from another plant caused mortality ≥90% within 72 h (Table 2). These AEs were from A. yucatanensis (L), C. latifolia (S, R), Croton arboreus (S), C. itzaeus (S), Diospyros sp. (L), H. baruensis (S), M. glabra (L), and Tabernaemontana donnell-smithii (L). When these nine highly toxic AEs from eight different plant species were tested at 3% (w/v), five caused high mortality (>75%): AEs from the leaves of A. yucatanensis, C. itzaeus, C. latifolia, and H. baruensis and from the stems of H. baruensis (Table 2).
In general, the AEs from the leaves of A. yucatanensis and H. baruensis were the most active against both nematodes. The AE of A. yucatanensis had the lowest LD50 against both species, 0.36% (w/v) on M. incognita and 3.80% w/v on M. javanica, and the lowest LD90 (1.83% w/v) against M. incognita. Interestingly, the LD90 was very similar for the AEs of A. yucatanensis and H. baruensis against M. javanica, 5.64 and 5.71% (w/v), respectively. In addition, there was a significant difference in the LD50 and LD90 between the two plant species against M. incognita but not for M. javanica (Table 3, Figure 1 and Figure 2).

2.2. Ecotoxicity of the AE of Alseis yucatanensis on Eisenia fetida

The AE from the leaves of A. yucatanensis had an ecotoxicological effect within 72 h on adults of E. fetida at 3% (w/v) and was lethal at 6% (w/v). Treatments with serial dilutions of this AE showed that the LD50 was 2.80% (w/v) and the LD90 was 4.72% (w/v) (Table 4). By contrast, the AE of H. baruensis, and other most active AEs from leaves of A. primigenia, C. itzaeus and M. cerifera, were not ecotoxic to adults of E. fetida in this acute assay (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

The present contribution is part of the first bioprospecting research on native plant extracts against M. javanica and the second against M. incognita. Further, it enriches our knowledge about the natural nematicidal properties of some plant species of the flora of the Yucatan Peninsula. Previous studies on 55 plant extracts from 20 native plants showed that the AE from C. urticifolia (2.6%, w/v) and ethanol extracts from C. urticifolia, E. winzerlingii, and Tephrosia cinerea (500 ppm) were effective against M. incognita [26,27,28]. We found no reports of nematicidal activity for the plant species studied here after an exhaustive literature search. Bioprospecting of the 75 AEs from native plant species for activity against the J2s of M. javanica and M. incognita led to the detection of 33 AEs (44%) from 20 plant species (59% of the total) with high effectiveness (M = 90–100%) at 6 w/v. At 3% (w/v), 22 AEs (20% of the total) caused >75% mortality against at least one nematode species.
The J2s of M. incognita were more sensitive to plant extracts; 19 AEs (25% of the total tested) caused >75% mortality at 3%. Other authors reported similar mortality to what we found, but the AE concentrations were higher. For example, AEs from Achyranthes aspera, Ageratum conyzoides, and Solanum xanthocarpum leaves at 33% (w/v) caused 84–98% mortality after 48 h of exposure to J2 larvae of M. incognita [29,30]. AEs from C. longa, N. sativa, and P. nigrum caused 36% mortality against the J2s of M. javanica at 40% (w/v) after 72 h [18]. Likewise, AEs from the seeds and shoots of A. indica and leaves of Nerium oleander and Olea europea caused 53–65% mortality at 10% (w/v) after 48 h [31]. The AEs tested here induced higher nematicidal activity against M. incognita J2s at lower concentrations. Furthermore, the LD50 and LD90 of the AE from the leaves of A. yucatanensis against the J2s of M. javanica after 72 h were lower than those documented for the AEs from the leaves of Cinnamomum zeylanicum (LD50 of 15.38 mg/mL and LD90 of 24.73 mg/mL) and Eugenia caryophyllata (LD50 = 17.91 mg/mL and LD90 = 23.45 mg/mL) after 24 h [32]. AEs obtained with water extraction at 100 °C, for 10 h and 14 h at 25 ºC, from C. abyssinica at 1:10 (w/v) were reported to cause 72.2% mortality in J2s of M. javanica after 24 h [19]. In particular, more AEs have been tested against M. incognita than against M. javanica based on our search of the literature. Reports of plant extracts tested against M. javanica more commonly focused on organic extracts and essential oils [14]. On the other hand, the nematicidal potential of hydrolate distilled waters that remain after hydro- or steam distillation, and separation of the essential oil, have been amply demonstrated [33]. Specifically, the nematicidal effects in vitro and in vivo of hydrolates from Spanish aromatic plant species Alium sativum, Artemisia absintium, Lavandula × intermedia var. Super, L. luisieri, Thymus vulgaris, T. zygis, and purple garlic have been tested against M. javanica [34,35,36,37]. Furthermore, hydrolates from Greek aromatic species Origanum vulgare, Mentha piperita, and Melissa officinalis, Satureja hellenica, and C. cyminum showed in vitro high activity towards M. incognita and M. javanica [38,39,40].
In the present work, 25% of the AEs had greater lethality against J2s at 3% w/v than 6% w/v, but the difference in lethality was significant for only eight of these AEs (>12% difference): AEs from Alvaradoa amorphoides leaves and roots, Bakeridesia notolophium leaves, Byrsonima bucidifolia leaves, Licaria sp. leaves, M. cerifera stem, P. cubana stem bark, and Paullinia sp. leaves. This phenomenon of lower concentrations causing greater mortality than higher ones has been reported previously. For example, leaf extracts from C. urticifolia at 500 ppm caused 90% mortality, but 250 ppm caused 97% mortality against J2s of M. incognita [26]. Similarly, the extracts of Achillea wilhelmsii at 6% (w/v) caused 10.6% mortality, and 15.6% at 3% (w/v) [41]. These data could be due to pipetting errors, temperature variations, or variations in the extract dosage and exposure duration [42]. Moreover, during incubation, precipitates can be formed in the 6% concentration and adhere to the microplate walls, lowering the concentration of exposure.
The present contribution adds to the few works on the in vitro activity of plant extracts against M. javanica and M. incognita. For example, organic extracts and fractions of Eugenia winzerlingii leaves caused 100% mortality at 1 µg/µL against J2s of M. javanica and M. incognita within 72 h; such activity was conferred by decanoic, undecanoic, and dodecanoic acids [28]. The essential oils of S. hellenica caused 100% paralysis of the J2s of M. javanica and M. incognita at 200 µL/L after 96 h due to the activity of p-cymene and carvacrol [39].
Our nematicidal bioassays indicate that the AEs from the leaves of A. yucatanensis and H. baruensis are the most promising against M. incognita and M. javanica. Among the 22 plant species belonging to the genus Alseis (Rubiaceae), only two are described for Mexico, A. yucatanensis and A. hondurensis Standl. Both tree species are endemic to Southern Mexico and part of Central America [24,43]. Our report is the first to show the nematicidal activity of an extract from A. yucatanensis against J2s of M. incognita and M. javanica. Studies by the working group have documented that the AE of the leaves of A. yucatanensis had no antifungal activity at 2000 µg/mL against the phytopathogens Fusarium equiseti and F. oxysporum [44]. The only reported activity of this species is the vasorelaxation (VR) of aortic tissue in rats with a median effective dose of 0.12 mg/mL of the AE from the bark [45]. For other species of the genus, ethanol and acetone–water (7:3) extracts of the leaves of Alseis blackiana were reported to have moderate in vitro antiviral activity (VR of 0.5 to 1.0) against HSV-1 and HSV-2 (herpes simplex virus) at 100 µg/mL [46]. Nematicidal activity of some Rubiaceae species has been reported: soil amendments at 1.0% (w/w) of plant debris from Coffea arabiga reduced the incidence of root galls on Cucurbita pepo caused by M. arenaria, and an aqueous extract of Moringa pterygosperma leaves at 1:5 caused 100% mortality of the J2s of M. incognita after 24 h [47]. However, nothing is known about the phytochemistry of A. yucatanensis. In the genus Alseis, only alkaloid components from Alseis blackiana were detected by a positive Dragendorff’s test [48]. Indole alkaloids have been widely reported from members of the families Rubiaceae, Apocynaceae, and Loganiaceae, which have prominent activity against diverse biological targets [49]. The application of powdered leaves (1, 3, and 5 g) of Catharanthus roseus is highly effective (M = 71.8, 71.6, and 72.6%) in controlling M. incognita infection in potted pumpkins (Cucumis sativum) [50]. Waltheriones E and A from Triumfetta grandidens are effective against M. incognita [51], and harmine from Peganum harmala is active against M. javanica [52].
The genus Helicteres (Malvaceae) consists of 60 species distributed mainly in America, with four species described from Mexico and three of them, H. baruensis, H. guazumifolia, and H. mexicana, from the Yucatan Peninsula [53,54]. This genus is found in tropical and subtropical regions, mainly in deciduous forests. The plant H. baruensis (Mayan name of sutup) is first reported with nematicidal activity for the species and genus. Petroleum ether and chloroform extracts from H. baruensis have action against Salmonella enteritidis and Bacillus cereus; this activity is attributed to sterols and alkaloids [55], but their ethanol and AE did not have antifungal activity against F. equiseti or F. oxysporum [44]. Further, their methanol and dichloromethane extracts had no anti-neoplastic activity against the LNCaP prostate cancer cell line [56]. In addition to sterols and alkaloids, polyphenols are also present in its leaves [57].
Earthworms have been used for in vitro ecotoxicity assays of pesticides to evaluate environmental risk. The filter paper contact test is used to determine the initial acute toxicity of soil contaminants [22]. In the present study, the ecotoxicity of A. yucatanensis caused slight acute toxicity towards E. fetida. Other studies on the AE, such as artificial soil tests [22] and chronic ecotoxicity tests, should be conducted next. These toxicity tests have not been commonly reported for natural extracts or metabolites from plants or other organisms [21]. Among these, an essential oil from Piper betle at 1000 µg/cm2 was innocuous to E. fetida; mortality was only 5.4% after 48 h in the filter paper contact test [58]. Cucurbitacin E from Citrus colocynthis had good efficacy after 48 h against Spodoptera litura with LD50 of 15.84 ppm and LD90 of 67.70 ppm, and at 100 ppm, it induced 11% mortality of E. fetida [59], corroborating its lack of effect against this non-target soil organism.
After application, the plant extracts readily decompose when exposed to environmental factors such as light and temperature [60]. Therefore, the nematicidal extracts from A. yucatanensis and H. baruensis and other promising AEs should be further tested in the greenhouse and field for toxic or beneficial effects on plants. The active compounds also need to be identified, purified, and tested for toxicity against additional non-target organisms.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Plant species were collected from 2016 to 2018 in the three states in the Yucatan Peninsula: (1) Xmaben, Hopelchen, Campeche (19°15′42.92″ N, 89°21′45.91″ W); (2) the Jahuactal of Ejido Caobas, Othón P. Blanco (18°15′34″ N, 88°57′14″ W), (3) Punta Pulticub, Othón P. Blanco (19°04′29.96″ N, 87°33′17.15″ W), and (4) Punta Laguna, Carretera Cobá—Nuevo Xcan (20°38′49.4″ N, 87 °38′02.2″ W) in Quintana Roo; (5) Kaxil Kiuic, Oxkutzcab, Yucatan (20° 06′10.8″ N; 89°33′43.2″ W). The leaves, stem, stem bark, roots, and root bark were collected from most plant species, and complete plants were collected for some species. One specimen of each collected species was deposited in the Herbarium-Fibroteca U Najil Tikin Xiw”of the Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (Table 1 and Table 2).
The plant material was dried in a lamp chamber (50–60 °C) for 3 days and crushed in a grinder (Model 1520, Pagani, Azcapotzalco, Mexico) with blades (5 mm screen) and kept in the dark in a cold room until use. A total of 75 samples from the 34 plant species were obtained.

4.2. Preparation of Aqueous Extracts (AEs)

The powdered plant material (1.5 g) was added to 20 mL of boiling distilled water for 5 min, then cooled and filtered through cheesecloth cotton and filter paper (Whatman No. 1). The water volume was brought to 25 mL to obtain an AE at an initial concentration of 6% (w/v). All AEs were frozen (−17.5 ± 0.5 °C) and lyophilized (Labconco FreeZone 2.5, model 7670520, Houston, TX, USA) for 15 h to reduce the volume to 50% and obtain a concentration of 12% (w/v) of the original plant material for each extract. The concentrated AEs were then sterilized using a 0.22 µm Millipore filter (Merck-Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and frozen until use.

4.3. Nematicide Bioassay

The nematode populations of M. javanica were obtained from the Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias (25 ± 1 °C/70% relative humidity (RH)), and M. incognita from the Tecnológico Nacional de México—Campus Conkal (30 ± 2 °C/90% RH). The populations of both species were maintained on Solanum lycopersicum (var. Marmande) plants in plastic pots in a greenhouse. For bioassays, egg masses were manually recovered from galled roots and incubated for 72 h in sterile water at 30 ± 2 °C for M. incognita and 25 ± 1 °C for M. javanica. Hatched second-instar juveniles (J2s) were adjusted to a final concentration of 100 J2s/100 μL of distilled water [14,26].
Each well of a 96-well U-bottom plate (NEST Biotechnology, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China) received 100 µL of the AE (12%, w/v) and 100 µL of the nematode suspension. As a positive control, the synthetic nematicide Vydate® (oxamyl 235 g/L) was used at 1 µL/mL, and the suspension of nematodes in distilled water (100 J2s/100 µL) was used as a negative control. For each treatment, four replicate wells were evaluated. The experimental plates were sealed and incubated in the dark using the same conditions used for the egg masses (vide supra) described by Moo-Koh et al. [14,61].
Any immobile J2 larvae that were insensitive to a needle touch were counted as dead at 72 h and expressed as percentage mortality (M%). The data obtained from the nematicidal activity are presented as corrected percentages of J2s mortality (Schneide–Orelli formula: % efficiency = (b − k/100 − k) × 100, where b = % of dead individuals in the treatment and k = % of dead individuals in the control [62]. The extracts that caused the greatest mortality were then evaluated at serial dilutions (6, 3, 1.5% w/v or less). The LD50 and LD90 values were determined using a probit analysis with SAS ver. 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

4.4. Eisenia Fetida Assay

For the E. fetida assay (a contact test on filter paper, OECD 207 1984), 1 mL of the test AE at 6 and 3% (w/v) was dropped onto a Whatman No. 1 filter paper (6.4 cm long × 7.8 cm wide) at a final concentration of 1200 and 600 µg/cm2 and kept in a hood extractor until completely dry. The filter paper was then placed in a glass vial (8 cm long × 3 cm in diameter). The earthworms were purchased (PlanetaMexico, Mexico City, Mexico) and maintained in organic horse manure and soil at 28 ± 2 °C until they were adults (2 months old) and weighing 300–600 mg each. Then, they were washed with water and kept on moist filter paper in the dark for 3 h to ensure that all intestinal contents had been released. Water was used as a negative control and a synthetic nematicide (Vydate® (oxamyl 42%), Dupont) as a positive control at 1 µg/mL (0.02 μg/cm2). Each vial received 1 mL of distilled water to keep the filter paper moist and one earthworm deposited; then, vials were covered with a gauze-type cloth that was secured with a rubber band to ensure ventilation and retain the earthworms in the vial. For each treatment, 20 replicate vials were used. The vials were placed in a humid chamber at 26 ± 2 °C in the dark. Every 24 h for 72 h, the worms were checked and considered dead if they did not respond to a small stimulus in the anterior region. Any pathological behaviors or symptoms were also recorded [22].
Serial dilutions (6, 3, 1.5% w/v or less) of the AE with ecotoxicity were tested and worms checked every 24 h for 72 h as described above. The results were processed in SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to obtain the LD50 and LD90.

5. Conclusions

Our knowledge of Mexican flora as potential nematicides has been enriched. In this approach to surveying plant species in the Yucatan Peninsula for bioactivity against phytopathogenic nematodes, we confirmed that native species caused high mortality against the J2s of the phytonematodes M. incognita and M. javanica. The AEs from A. yucatanensis and H. baruensis leaves were the most effective; the first had low ecotoxicity, and the second none. With high efficacy in vitro against both nematodes, the aqueous extracts of A. yucatanensis and H. baruensis are highly promising candidates for developing products to control Meloidogyne nematodes.

Author Contributions

Design and supervision of the study, J.C.-A. and M.G.-A.; plant species identification, G.C.; maintenance of nematodes, F.A.M.-K. and J.A.-G.; nematicidal bioassays, J.A.-G. and F.A.M.-K.; academic support and supervision of the nematicidal bioassays, M.F.A. and J.C.-A.; financial support of the project, A.G.-C. and M.G.-A.; project coordination, J.C.-A. and M.F.A.; creation of first draft, J.A.-G., D.P.-B. and M.G.-A.; review of the manuscript, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)—International Development Research Centre (IDRC) financed project No. CEAR2019-01, CONACYT-PN-2015-266, and Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación/Agencia Estatal de Investigación (MCIN/AEI) financed project 10.13039/501100011033. The APC was funded by personal resources.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Irma L. Medina-Baizabal, Jose Luis Tapia muñoz, Sergio Pérez, Miriam Juan, and Narcedalia Gamboa for technical support. J.A.-G. thanks Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for a doctoral student scholarship (No. 921863).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahuja, A.; Somvanshi, V.S. Diagnosis of plant-parasitic nematodes using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A review. J. Crop Prot. 2021, 147, 105459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Elling, A.A. Major Emerging problems with minor Meloidogyne Species. Phytopathology 2013, 103, 1092–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Čepulytė, R.; Danquah, W.B.; Bruening, G.; Williamson, V.M. Potent attractant for root-knot nematodes in exudates from seedling root tips of two host species. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ghaderi, R.; Karssen, G. An updated checklist of Meloidogyne Göldi, 1887 species, with a diagnostic compendium for second-stage juveniles and males. J. Crop Prot. 2020, 9, 183–193. [Google Scholar]
  5. Agrios, G.N. Plant diseases caused by nematodes. In Plant Pathology; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 825–874. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tapia-Vázquez, I.; Montoya-Martínez, A.C.; De los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Ek-Ramos, M.J.; Montesinos-Matías, R.; Martínez-Anaya, C. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) a threat to agriculture in Mexico: Biology, current control strategies, and perspectives. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abad, P.; Castagnone-Sereno, P.; Rosso, M.N.; de Almeida, E.J.; Favery, B. Invasion, feeding and development. In Root-Knot Nematodes; Perry, R.N., Moens, M., Starr, J.L., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2009; pp. 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goverse, A.; Smant, G. The activation and suppression of plant innate immunity by parasitic nematodes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014, 52, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Saadony, M.T.; Abuljadayel, D.A.; Shafi, M.E.; Albaqami, N.M.; Desoky, E.S.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Mesiha, P.K.; Elnahal, A.S.M.; Almakas, A.; Taha, A.E.; et al. Control of foliar phytoparasitic nematodes through sustainable natural materials: Current progress and challenges. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 7314–7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nyczepir, A.P.; Thomas, S.H. Current and future management strategies in intensive crop production systems. In Root-Knot Nematodes; Perry, R.N., Moens, M., Starr, J., Eds.; CABI International: Wallingford, UK, 2009; pp. 412–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Walia, S.; Saha, S.; Tripathi, V.; Sharma, K.K. Phytochemical biopesticides: Some recent developments. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 16, 989–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gómez-Ramos, M.D.M.; Nannou, C.; Martínez Bueno, M.J.; Goday, A.; Murcia-Morales, M.; Ferrer, C.; Fernández-Alba, A.R. Pesticide residues evaluation of organic crops. A critical appraisal. Food Chem. 2020, 5, 100079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chitwood, D.J. Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 221–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Andrés, M.F.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A.; Sanz, J.; Burillo, J.; Sainz, P. Nematicidal activity of essential oils: A review. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mojumder, V.; Kamra, A.; Dureja, P. Effect of neem extracts on activity and mortality of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita. Nematol. Medit. 2002, 30, 83–84. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zaidat, S.A.E.; Mouhouche, F.; Babaali, D.; Abdessemed, N.; De Cara, M.; Hammache, M. Nematicidal activity of aqueous and organic extracts of local plants against Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood in Algeria. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Cont. 2020, 30, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akhter, G.; Khan, T.A. Evaluation of some plant extracts for nemato-toxic potential against juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita in vitro. J. Phytopharm. 2018, 7, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abbas, S.; Dawar, S.; Tariq, M.; Zaki, M.J. Nematicidal activity of spices against Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 2625–2632. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tarini, G.; Melo, A.S.; Fontana, L.F.; da Silva Júnior, E.; Bolanho, B.C.; Moreno, B.P.; Dias-Arieira, C.R. Aqueous extracts of Crambe abyssinica seed cake: Chemical composition and potential for nematode control. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 156, 112860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Andrade-Herrera, M.; Escalona-Segura, G.; González-Jáuregui, M.; Reyna-Hurtado, R.A.; Vargas-Contreras, J.A.; Osten, J.R.-V. Presence of pesticides and toxicity assessment of agricultural soils in the Quintana Roo Mayan zone, Mexico using biomarkers in earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pino-Otín, M.R.; Val, J.; Ballestero, D.; Navarro, E.; Sánchez, E.; González-Coloma, A.; Mainar, A.M. Ecotoxicity of a new biopesticide produced by Lavandula luisieri on non-target soil organisms from different trophic levels. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. OECD. Method 207: Earthworm acute toxicity tests. In Guidelines for Testing Chemicals, Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD: Paris, France, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ponsankar, A.; Vasantha-Srinivasan, P.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Thanigaivel, A.; Edwin, E.; Selin-Rani, S.; Kalaivani, K.; Hunter, W.B.; Alessandro, R.T.; Abel-Megeed, A.; et al. Target and non-target toxicity of botanical insecticide derived from Couroptia guianensis L. flower against generalist herbivore, Spodoptera litura Fab, and an earthworm, Eisenia fetida Savigny. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 133, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Villaseñor, J.L. Checklist of the native vascular plants of Mexico. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2016, 87, 550–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hernández-Carlos, B.; Gamboa-Angulo, M. Insecticidal and nematicidal contributions of Mexican flora in the search for safer biopesticides. Molecules 2019, 24, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Tun-Suárez, J.M.; Moguel-Catzin, S.; Marbán-Mendoza, N.; Medina-Baizabal, L.; Simá-Polanco, P.; Peraza-Sánchez, E.R.; Gamboa-Angulo, M.M. In vitro sensitivity of Meloidogyne incognita to extracts from native Yucatecan plants. Nematropica 2006, 36, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  27. Herrera-Parra, E.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Tún-Suárez, J.M.; Gamboa-Angulo, M.M.; Marbán-Mendoza, N. Extractos acuosos de Calea urticifolia para el control de Meloidogyne incognita. Nematropica 2009, 39, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cruz-Estrada, A.; Ruiz-Sánchez, E.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; González-Coloma, A.; Fe Andrés, M.; Gamboa-Angulo, M. Medium-chain fatty acids from Eugenia winzerlingii leaves causing insect settling deterrent, nematicidal, and phytotoxic effects. Molecules 2019, 24, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Asif, M.; Tariq, M.; Khan, A.; Rehman, B.; Parihar, K.; Siddiqui, M.A. Potential role of aqueous extract of some weeds against egg hatching and juvenile mortality of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. J. Agric. Crops 2017, 3, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  30. Asif, M.; Tariq, M.; Khan, K.; Siddiqui, M.A. Biocidal and antinemic properties of aqueous extracts of Ageratum and Coccinia against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 12, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moosavi, M.R. Nematicidal effect of some herbal powders and their aqueous extracts against Meloidogyne javanica. Nematropica 2012, 42, 48–56. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sardari, A.A.; Jalali, H.A.A.; Bahraminejad, S.; Safaee, D. Effect of plant extracts on the mortality of root-knot nematodes J2, Meloidogyne javanica. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2015, 48, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Andrés, M.F.; Gozález-Coloma, A. Agro-industrial by-products and wastes as source of biopesticides. In Recent Advances and Prospective in the Biocontrol of Plant Diseases; Dumas, B., Prigent-Combaret, C., Eds.; ITSE: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. Andrés, M.F.; González-Coloma, A.; Muñoz, R.; De la Peña, F.; Julio, L.F.; Burillo, J. Nematicidal potential of hydrolates from the semi industrial vapor-pressure extraction of Spanish aromatic plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 29834–29840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Julio, L.F.; González-Coloma, A.; Burillo, J.; Diaz, C.E.; Andrés, M.F. Nematicidal activity of the hydrolate byproduct from the semi industrial vapor pressure extraction of domesticated Artemisia absinthium against Meloidogyne javanica. Crop Prot. 2017, 94, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Galisteo, A.; González-Coloma, A.; Castillo, P.; Andrés, M.F. Valorization of the hydrolate byproduct from the industrial extraction of purple Alium sativum essential oil as a source of nematicidal products. Life 2022, 12, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. de Elguea-Culebras, G.O.; Sanchez-Vioque, R.; Berruga, M.I.; Herraiz-Penalver, D.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A.; Andrés, M.F.; Santana-Meridas, O. Biocidal potential and chemical composition of industrial essential oils from Hyssopus officinalis, Lavandula × intermedia var. super, and Santolina chamaecyparissus. Chem. Biodivers. 2018, 15, e1700313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ntalli, N.G.; Ozalexandridou, E.X.; Kasiotis, K.M.; Samara, M.; Golfinopoulos, S.K. Nematicidal activity and phytochemistry of greek Lamiaceae species. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pardavella, I.; Nasiou, E.; Daferera, D.; Trigas, P.; Giannakou, I. The use of essential oil and hydrosol extracted from Satureja hellenica for the control of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica. Plants 2020, 7, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pardavella, I.; Daferera, D.; Tselios, T.; Skiada, P.; Giannakou, I. The use of essential oil and hydrosol extracted from Cuminum cyminum seeds for the control of Meloidogyne incognita and Meloidogyne javanica. Plants 2021, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kepenekçi, I.; Erdoğuş, D.; Erdoğan, P. Effects of some plant extracts on root-knot nematodes in vitro and in vivo conditions. Turk. Entomoloji Derg. 2016, 40, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garrido, C.F.; Cepeda, S.M.; Hernández, C.F.D.; Ochoa, F.Y.M.; Cerna, C.E.; Morales, A.D.M. Efectividad biológica de extractos de Carya illinoensis, para el control de Meloidogyne incognita. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 2014, 5, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar]
  43. The Plant List. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=Alseis (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  44. Cruz-Cerino, P.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Ruiz-Carrera, V.; Carnevali, G.; Vera-Ku, M.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F.; Gamboa-Angulo, M. Extracts from six native plants of the Yucatán Peninsula hinder mycelial growth of Fusarium equiseti and F. oxysporum, pathogens of Capsicum chinense. Pathogens 2020, 9, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Slish, D.F.; Arvigo, R.; Balick, M.J. Alseis yucatanensis: A natural product from Belize that exhibits multiple mechanisms of vasorelaxation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Romin, T.L.; Weber, N.D.; Murray, B.K.; North, J.A.; Wood, S.G.; Hughes, B.G.; Cates, R.G. Antiviral activity of panamanian plant extracts. Phytother. Res. 1992, 6, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sahayaraj, K. Nanotechnology and plant biopesticides: An overview. In Advances in Plant Biopesticides; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2014; pp. 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Soto-Sobenis, A.; Castillo, B.; Delgado, A.; González, A.; Montenegro, R. Alkaloid screening of herbarium samples of Rubiaceae from Panama. Pharm. Biol. 2001, 39, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rosales, P.F.; Bordin, G.S.; Gower, A.E.; Moura, S. Indole alkaloids: 2012 until now, highlighting the new chemical structures and biological activities. Fitoterapia 2020, 143, 104558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mostafa, F.; Refaei, A.; Khalil, A.; El-Deriny, M. Potential use of botanicals rich in alkaloids for controlling Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis infecting cucurbits. Egypt J. Agronematol. 2016, 15, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jang, J.Y.; Le Dang, Q.; Choi, Y.H.; Choi, G.J.; Jang, K.S.; Cha, B.; Luu, N.H.; Kim, J.-C. Nematicidal activities of 4-quinolone alkaloids isolated from the aerial part of Triumfetta grandidens against Meloidogyne incognita. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 63, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mayad, E.H.; Basaid, K.; Furze, J.N.; Heimeur, N.; Senhaji, B.; Chebli, B.; Hadek, E.M.; Mateille, T.; Hassani, L.A.I.; Ferji, Z. Reversible nematostatic effect of Peganum harmala L. (Nitrariaceae) on Meloidogyne javanica. J. AgriSearch 2019, 6, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carnevali, G.; Tapia-Muñoz, J.L.; Duno de Stefano, R.; Ramírez-Morillo, I.M.; Can-Itzá, L.; Hernández-Aguilar, S.; Castillo, A. La flora de la Península de Yucatán Mexicana: 250 años de conocimiento florístico. CONABIO. Biodiversitas 2012, 101, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  54. Martínez-Gordillo, M.; Clase, T.; Fragoso-Martínez, I. Helicteres pegueroi (Malvaceae: Helicteroideae): A new species from the dry forests of the Dominican Republic. Phytotaxa 2020, 438, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tarache, A. Separación e Identificación de Algunos Compuestos Constituyentes de la Planta Helicteres baruensis Jacq. (Sterculiaceae) y Su Actividad Biológica. Bachelor’s Thesis, Departamento de Química, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  56. Fort, R.; Trinidad Barnech, J.; Dourron, J.; Colazzo, M.; Aguirre-Crespo, F.; Duhagon, M.; Álvarez, G. Isolation and structural characterization of bioactive molecules on prostate cancer from Mayan traditional medicinal plants. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. D’Armas, H.; Tarache, A.; González, G.O.; Quintero, M. Phytochemical analysis and bioactivity of Helicteres baruensis Jacq. (Sterculiaceae). Ing. Indust.: Actual. Nuevas Tend. 2019, 6, 97–116. [Google Scholar]
  58. Vasantha-Srinivasan, P.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Ponsankar, A.; Thanigaivel, A.; Chellappandian, M.; Edwin, E.S. Acute toxicity of chemical pesticides and plant-derived essential oil on the behavior and development of earthworms, Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) and Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 25, 10371–10382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ponsankar, A.; Sahayaraj, K.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Vasantha-Srinivasan, P.; Karthi, S.; Thanigaivel, A.; Petchidurai, G.; Madasamy, M.; Hunter, W.B. Toxicity and developmental effect of cucurbitacin E from Citrullus colocynthis L. (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) against Spodoptera litura Fab. and a non-target earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 27, 23390–23401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ponte, J.J. Histórico das pesquisas sobre a utilização da manipueira (extrato líquido das raízes de mandioca) como defensivos agrícola. Fitopatol. Venez. 1992, 5, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
  61. Moo-Koh, F.A.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Andrés, M.F.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F.; Tun-Suárez, J.M.; Gamboa-Angulo, M. In vitro assessment of organic and residual fractions of nematicidal culture filtrates from thirteen tropical Trichoderma strains and metabolic profiles of most-active. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Püntener, W. Manual for Field Trials in Plant Protection, 2nd ed.; Ciba-Geigy Limited: Basel, Switzerland, 1981. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 02138 g001 550
Figure 1. Alseis yucatanensis: (A) tree; (B) leaves; (C) inflorescence.
Figure 1. Alseis yucatanensis: (A) tree; (B) leaves; (C) inflorescence.
Plants 11 02138 g001
Plants 11 02138 g002 550
Figure 2. Helicteres baruensis: (A) shrub; (B) flower; (C) fruit.
Figure 2. Helicteres baruensis: (A) shrub; (B) flower; (C) fruit.
Plants 11 02138 g002
Plants 11 02138 g003 550
Figure 3. Acute contact ecotoxicity assay of (A) Alseis yucatanensis (1 mL, 3% w/v); (B) Helicteres baruensis (1 mL, 6% w/v), (C) water (1 mL), (D) oxamyl (1 µL/mL) using filter paper (49.92 cm2) and Eisenia fetida.
Figure 3. Acute contact ecotoxicity assay of (A) Alseis yucatanensis (1 mL, 3% w/v); (B) Helicteres baruensis (1 mL, 6% w/v), (C) water (1 mL), (D) oxamyl (1 µL/mL) using filter paper (49.92 cm2) and Eisenia fetida.
Plants 11 02138 g003
Table
Table 1. Native plants from the Yucatan Peninsula evaluated against second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica.
Table 1. Native plants from the Yucatan Peninsula evaluated against second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica.
Plant SpeciesFamilySiteVoucher
Alseis yucatanensis Standl.Rubiaceae5JLT-3179
Alvaradoa amorphoides Liebm.Simaroubaceae2GC 8236
Annona primigenia Standl. & Steyerm.Annonaceae2GC-8057
Bakeridesia notolophium (A. Gray) Hochr.Malvaceae3RD-s/n
Byrsonima bucidifolia Standl.Malpighiaceae2GC-8087
Calea jamaicensis (L.) L.Asteraceae2GC-8084
Cameraria latifolia L.Apocynaceae2JLT-1165
Chrysophyllum mexicanum Brandegee ex Standl.Sapotaceae2GC-8082
Coccoloba sp.Polygonaceae1GC-8258
Croton arboreus Millsp.Euphorbiaceae2JLT-1132
Croton itzaeus LundellEuphorbiaceae2JLT-1138
Diospyros sp.Ebenaceae4GC-8147
Erythroxylum confusum BrittonErythroxylaceae2GC-8179
Eugenia sp.Myrtaceae4GC-8127
Euphorbia armourii Millsp.Euphorbiaceae5JLT-3182
Guettarda combsii Urb.Rubiaceae2GC-8047
Helicteres baruensis Jacq.Malvaceae5GC-8127
Hybanthus yucatanensis Millsp.Violaceae4GC-8158
Ipomoea clavata (G. Don) Ooststr. ex J.F. MacbrConvolvulaceae5JLT-3181
Karwinskia humboldtiana(Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) Zucc.Rhamnaceae5JLT-3188
Licaria sp.Lauraceae2GC-8037
Macroscepis diademata (Ker Gawl.) W.D. StevensApocynaceae5JLT-3187
Malpighia glabra L.Malpighiaceae4GC-8144
Morella cerifera (L.) Small.Myricaceae2JLT-1137
Mosannona depressa (Baill.) ChatrouAnnonaceae2GC-8085
Parathesis cubana (A. DC.) Molinet & M. GómezPrimulaceae2JLT-1133
Paullinia sp.Sapindaceae4GC-8106
Piper neesianum C. DC.Piperaceae2GC-8080
Psychotria sp.Rubiaceae2GC-8086
Randia aculeata L.Rubiaceae4GC-8156
Serjania caracasana (Jacq.) WilldSapindaceae4GC-8114
Simarouba glauca DC.Simaroubaceae2GC-8081
Tabernaemontana donnell-smithii RoseApocynaceae2GC-8056
Turnera aromatica ArboPassifloraceae2GC-8081
—Sites: (1) Xmaben, Campeche; (2) Ejido Jahuactal; (3) Punta Pulticub; (4) Punta Laguna, Quintana Roo; (5) Kaxil Kiuic, Yucatan.
Table
Table 2. Nematicidal effects of aqueous extracts from native plants of the Yucatan Peninsula against second-stage juveniles (J2) of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica after 72 h of exposure.
Table 2. Nematicidal effects of aqueous extracts from native plants of the Yucatan Peninsula against second-stage juveniles (J2) of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica after 72 h of exposure.
Plant SpeciesPlant Part aJ2 Mortality (%) c
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne javanica
6% (w/v) b3% (w/v) b6% (w/v) b3% (w/v) b
Alseis yucatanensisL100 ± 0.0094 ± 1.01100 ± 0.00100 ± 0.00
Alvaradoa amorphoidesL33 ± 0.9174 ± 1.179 ± 2.3432 ± 22.68
S29 ± 0.2424 ± 2.5415 ± 2.4413 ± 3.06
R30 ± 0.4376 ± 2.5734 ± 22.0711 ± 0.72
Annona primigeniaL94 ± 0.7871 ± 7.3374 ± 11.4675 ± 4.28
S100 ± 0.0097 ± 1.8351 ± 22.5744 ± 12.46
Bakeridesia notolophiumL23 ± 0.3866 ± 1.392 ± 1.036 ± 2.60
S4 ± 1.326 ± 0.1628 ± 23.9614 ± 5.82
Byrsonima bucidifoliaL60 ± 3.4517 ± 1.292 ± 0.8324 ± 20.18
S83 ± 0.7322 ± 2.5915 ± 1.625 ± 0.60
R81 ± 0.3922 ± 1.386 ± 1.5011 ± 1.83
Calea jamaicensisWP100 ± 0.4483 ± 1.0289 ± 3.0318 ± 2.61
Cameraria latifoliaL94 ± 0.4771 ± 0.6781 ± 2.5880 ± 13.13
Sne30 ± 3.1694 ± 2.298 ± 1.84
R88 ± 0.5974 ± 1.2494 ± 1.409 ± 2.69
Chrysophylum mexicanumL88 ± 0.4868 ± 2.5518 ± 4.0819 ± 3.40
S88 ± 0.4264 ± 1.266 ± 2.0618 ± 8.66
R92 ± 1.0786 ± 0.7711 ± 1.6819 ± 1.28
Coccoloba sp.L97 ± 0.5013 ± 0.828 ± 1.939 ± 18.20
S2 ± 0.8916 ± 0.5233 ± 1.665 ± 1.49
Croton arboreusL84 ± 0.5075 ± 1.3172 ± 2.2675 ± 4.61
S94 ± 1.6623 ± 0.9390 ± 2.3317 ± 6.57
R71 ± 4.1466 ± 2.4770 ± 10.708 ± 1.30
Croton itzaeusL78 ± 0.2635 ± 0.5880 ± 5.7390 ± 4.01
S92 ± 0.4919 ± 1.2394 ± 0.543 ± 2.69
R87 ± 0.3119 ± 2.633 ± 2.283 ± 0.99
Diospyros sp.L87 ± 0.5584 ± 0.6185 ± 5.085 ± 0.64
Erythroxylum confusumL86 ± 0.2936 ± 0.4124 ± 3.896 ± 0.89
Eugenia sp.L76 ± 0.5683 ± 0.493 ± 1.052 ± 1.95
S99 ± 0.788 ± 3.1138 ± 1.939 ± 3.10
R93 ± 3.424 ± 1.4190 ± 2.5317 ± 4.54
Euphorbia armouriiWP76 ± 0.1787 ± 0.8635 ± 9.7735 ± 17.57
Guettarda combsiiL94 ± 1.3768 ± 2.9326 ± 5.085 ± 2.52
S88 ± 0.5313 ± 3.594 ± 0.592 ± 1.63
R81 ± 0.5263 ± 7.8979 ± 7.5070 ± 2.38
Helicteres baruensisL80 ± 1.0277 ± 5.8389 ± 0.3483 ± 2.32
S84 ± 0.7163 ± 1.9392 ± 2.3087 ± 2.23
R66 ± 1.2323 ± 2.2147 ± 18.924 ± 1.70
Hybanthus yucatanensisL100 ± 0.0074 ± 2.7043 ± 9.865 ± 1.98
S100 ± 0.0088 ± 0.6055 ± 17.363 ± 1.75
Ipomoea clavataWP83 ± 0.5888 ± 0.8019 ± 3.179 ± 4.21
Karwinskia humboldtianaL84 ± 0.5877 ± 1.7280 ± 1.2539 ± 9.19
Licaria sp.L76 ± 0.3329 ± 1.1221 ± 13.4168 ± 3.46
SB89 ± 1.3724 ± 2.5960 ± 11.9424 ± 10.51
RB57 ± 0.173 ± 1.4850 ± 6.3727 ± 4.60
Macroscepis diademataL94 ± 2.2988 ± 1.3286 ± 5.8625 ± 24.22
S100 ± 0.0073 ± 3.4334 ± 22.885 ± 1.15
Malpighia glabraL88 ± 2.0075 ± 0.70100 ± 0.0055 ± 20.60
S93 ± 2.1965 ± 4.3421 ± 7.820 ± 0.48
R96 ± 0.1680 ± 1.0120 ± 8.7011 ± 6.97
Morella ceriferaL96 ± 0.2492 ± 0.9641 ± 20.9323 ± 18.85
S26 ± 0.2676 ± 3.895 ± 1.2723 ± 3.72
RB81 ± 0.3163 ± 1.636 ± 1.3011 ± 1.14
Mosannona depressaL90 ± 0.4167 ± 2.3763 ± 10.7840 ± 1.83
SB91 ± 0.4259 ± 3.1723 ± 2.6513 ± 3.18
RBne62 ± 1.148 ± 1.578 ± 0.46
Parathesis cubanaL88 ± 0.6652 ± 6.802 ± 1.204 ± 0.80
SB27 ± 4.2166 ± 3.253 ± 0.915 ± 1.15
RB75 ± 0.4439 ± 1.893 ± 1.477 ± 1.47
Paullinia sp.L40 ± 3.305 ± 0.753 ± 0.6331 ± 15.66
R22 ± 5.205 ± 0.757 ± 0.952 ± 0.36
Piper neesianumL90 ± 0.6678 ± 0.56nene
S92 ± 0.3074 ± 0.5641 ± 16.3050 ± 22.04
R92 ± 0.4784 ± 0.4131 ± 17.198 ± 1.18
Psychotria sp.WP92 ± 0.4861 ± 6.526 ± 0.7414 ± 2.04
Randia aculeataL100 ± 0.0087 ± 2.2647 ± 7.1431 ± 17.53
S99 ± 0.8211 ± 0.5314 ± 5.433 ± 1.12
R100 ± 0.0034 ± 2.4111 ± 2.766 ± 1.26
Serjania caracasanaL26 ± 1.085 ± 1.406 ± 0.674 ± 0.41
Simarouba glaucaL77 ± 0.6955 ± 5.315 ± 1.069 ± 0.34
S82 ± 1.8458 ± 1.0869 ± 14.575 ± 1.16
R84 ± 0.6043 ± 2.6653 ± 17.079 ± 0.77
Tabernaemontana donnell-smithiiL86 ± 1.1323 ± 2.1790 ± 2.163 ± 0.40
SB52 ± 0.2130 ± 5.333 ± 4.216 ± 0.66
Turnera aromaticaWP58 ± 14.8851 ± 0.8527 ± 20.848 ± 0.81
Negative control: water 00 ± 000 ± 000 ± 000 ± 0
Positive control: oxamyl 100 ± 0100 ± 0100 ± 0100 ± 0
a Plant parts: leaves (L); stem (S); root (R); root bark (RB); whole plant (WP); not evaluated (ne). b AE concentrations (w/v). c Values are mean ± standard error of four replicates.
Table
Table 3. Lethal doses (50 and 90) of the active aqueous extracts on second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica.
Table 3. Lethal doses (50 and 90) of the active aqueous extracts on second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica.
Plant SpeciesMeloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne javanica
LD50 (95% CL) a LD90 (95% CL)LD50 (95% CL)LD90 (95% CL)
Alseis yucatanensis0.36 (0.29, 0.43)1.83 (1.72, 1.97)3.80 (3.72, 3.89)5.64 (5.49, 5.79)
Helicteres baruensis1.34 (1.00, 1.63)7.36 (6.73, 8.17)4.05 (3.95, 4.14)5.71 (5.57, 5.87)
a At least four dilutions (w/v) were used, at 72 h, to obtain LD50 and LD90. CL denotes confidence limit.
Table
Table 4. Ecotoxicity and lethal doses (50 and 90) of nematicide aqueous extracts (leaves) against Eisenia fetida (one/vial, 20 replicates), after 72 h exposure.
Table 4. Ecotoxicity and lethal doses (50 and 90) of nematicide aqueous extracts (leaves) against Eisenia fetida (one/vial, 20 replicates), after 72 h exposure.
Plant SpeciesConc. % (w/v)Ecotoxicity
(% Mortality/h) a		Lethal Doses % (w/v)
24 h48 h72 hLD50 (95% CL) bLD90 (95% CL)
Alseis yucatanensis610851002.80 (2.3, 3.53)4.72 (3.90, 6.30)
353053
1.551026
0.75000.5
Helicteres baruensis6000
3000
Annona primigenia6000
3000
Croton itzaeus6000
3000
Morella cerifera6000
3000
Negative control: water 000
Positive control: oxamyl 100100100
a Corrected mortality percentages; b at least four dilutions (w/v) were used, at 72 h, to obtain LD50 and LD90. CL denotes confidence limit.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aviles-Gomez, J.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Andrés, M.F.; González-Coloma, A.; Carnevali, G.; Pérez-Brito, D.; Moo-Koh, F.A.; Gamboa-Angulo, M. Nematicidal Screening of Aqueous Extracts from Plants of the Yucatan Peninsula and Ecotoxicity. Plants 2022, 11, 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162138

AMA Style

Aviles-Gomez J, Cristóbal-Alejo J, Andrés MF, González-Coloma A, Carnevali G, Pérez-Brito D, Moo-Koh FA, Gamboa-Angulo M. Nematicidal Screening of Aqueous Extracts from Plants of the Yucatan Peninsula and Ecotoxicity. Plants. 2022; 11(16):2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aviles-Gomez, Jesús, Jairo Cristóbal-Alejo, María Fé Andrés, Azucena González-Coloma, Germán Carnevali, Daisy Pérez-Brito, Felicia Amalia Moo-Koh, and Marcela Gamboa-Angulo. 2022. "Nematicidal Screening of Aqueous Extracts from Plants of the Yucatan Peninsula and Ecotoxicity" Plants 11, no. 16: 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop