Next Article in Journal
Structural Reform, Technological Progress and Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing
Next Article in Special Issue
Bioremediation of Aquatic Environments Contaminated with Heavy Metals: A Review of Mechanisms, Solutions and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Tell Me What You Waste and I’ll Tell You Who You Are: An Eight-Country Comparison of Consumers’ Food Waste Habits
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Cellulose in Microbial Diversity Changes in the Soil Contaminated with Cadmium
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Phytoremediation of Aquatic Macrophyte Species for Heavy Metals in Urban Environments in the Southern Area of Brazil

by
Carolina Faccio Demarco
1,
Thays França Afonso
1,
Simone Pieniz
2,
Filipe Carlos Selau
3,
Fernando Machado Machado
1 and
Robson Andreazza
1,*
1
Center of Engineering, Graduate Program of Science and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96015-560, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
2
Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96015-560, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
3
Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96015-560, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010419
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 23 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Metal Contamination and Phytoremediation of Soil and Water)

Abstract

:
This research investigated four different species of aquatic macrophytes with natural occurrence in an urban environment highly anthropized in Southern Brazil. The aim of the research was to compare the phytoremediation potential among the species E. anagallis, H. grumosa, H. ranunculoides, and S. montevidensis through Pearson´s correlation analysis and cluster analysis, using the heavy metal content identified through HNO3 - HClO4 and phytoremediation indexes. The results highlighted the bioconcentration factor (BCF) of H. ranunculoides, with outstanding results for Cu BCF = 667.09, Zn BCF = 149.93, Cd BCF = 26.85, Cr BCF = 31.77, Ni BCF = 35.47, and Pb BCF= 126.29. Additionally, H. grumosa and S. montevidensis were also highlighted, considering the potential phytoremoval (g ha−1). Therefore, this study demonstrates the tolerance and potential for removal of heavy metals Cu, Cr, Cd, Pb, Ni, and Zn by the evaluated aquatic macrophyte species and elucidates the outstanding potential of application in phytoremediation purposes.

1. Introduction

The urbanization and industrialization processes within cities contribute to the release of contaminants into aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The contaminants reaching the aquatic environments are responsible for an increase in both sediments and water in these areas. In urban locations, the pollutants reach aquatic environments through rainfall runoffs that carry different loadings depending on the area and land use. Residential areas can contribute to nitrogen and phosphorous loadings, as well as domestic sewage, along with industrial wastewater discharges with high levels of heavy metals [1]. Additionally, means of transport are a source of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, sulfur, oil, and grease [2].
Among the contaminants, the presence of heavy metals in watercourses represents a threat considering the bioaccumulation properties in the food chain and risks to environment, animals, fish, plants, and population health. General consequences of heavy metal in excess are damage to the kidneys and bones, endocrine, cardiovascular, and neurological problems, in addition to potentiating the development of cancer [3].
The entrance of heavy metals into organisms can occur due to invertebrates which absorb levels of these elements and are a food source for fish and other aquatic species. Another route is immediate absorption via water, or even via sediment deposition—which is the first location for heavy-metal accumulation in aquatic environments [4].
In Brazil, the origin of most heavy-metal content in excess is due to mining activities, along with untreated effluent discharges from agricultural, industrial, and urban areas [5]. The Santa Bárbara Stream is an important watercourse for the municipality of Pelotas/RS, south Brazil, being responsible for the water supply of most parts of this city. The presence of aquatic macrophytes is widely noticed in the area, along with a smell and foam also present, indicating a possible eutrophication condition and highlighting the polluted condition of the area [6].
Several conventional methods can be applied to remove heavy metals from these environments, such as chemical separation, dredging, and electro-oxidation [7]. However, there are some cost limitations and environmental issues that limit the wide application of these techniques. Phytoremediation is an alternative and innovative method, since the specificity of species and genotypes allows the removal of different pollutants [7,8]. However, the efficient application of phytoremediation techniques presents a straight relationship with the understanding of mechanisms in which the plants tolerate and bioaccumulate heavy metals, with attention to the limits of the toxic level. It is also important the understand how the elements are translocated in the plants [9].
Different mechanisms enable plants to accumulate heavy metals, nutrients, and other contaminants. For heavy-metal uptake, the plant performs intracellular accumulation, alteration of gene expression responsible for uptake of these elements, efflux, sequestration, and translocation [10,11]. Among phytoremediation techniques, there is: phytoextraction, the accumulation by the shoots of the plants; phytostabilization, with the immobilization of contaminants; phytodegradation, degradation through the metabolic process; rhizodegradation, degradation in the rhizosphere; phytovolatilization, elimination of contaminants through a transpiration process; and rhizofiltration, filtration in the rhizosphere area without translocation [12].
For the efficient application of phytoremediation, the first step is the screening and identification of plant species with the ability to tolerate the high levels of the selected pollutant. For this prospection of plants, the strategy of studying plants from contaminated areas is promising [13]. In addition, it is necessary to understand the main mechanism by which the plant removes the contaminant, its transport within the plant, and its tolerance, among other aspects, in order to exploit its full potential [14].
The identification of tolerant native species is essential for the proper application of the technique, and there are essential factors such as adaptation to local condition and competitions with invasive/exotic species [15]. Worldwide, researchers have been investigating different aquatic macrophyte species’ potential for application in phytoremediation purposes, e.g., Eichhornia, Lemna, and Azolla, and in general, the requirements for the application are rapid growth and higher biomass production, along with tolerating higher levels of the selected contaminant [16].
Therefore, in this study, we propose the utilization of aquatic macrophyte species’ characteristics of South America, i.e., Enydra anagallis, Hydrocotyle ranunculoides, Hymenachne grumosa, and Sagittaria montevidensis, for phytoremediation, as well as comparison of the potential of accumulating heavy metals of these plants. We then highlight their great potential for application in phytoremediation purposes, thus representing a sustainable alternative for decontamination of water and wastewater.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is located in the municipality of Pelotas/RS (31°45′43″ S and 52°21′00″ W), Brazil. The Santa Bárbara Stream is the principal watercourse from Santa Bárbara Subwatershed, with 30,000 m of total length, and presents importance for the city since it serves as a water source for a great part of the population [17]. The Stream has suffered changes in its drainage bed, along with the construction of a dam for public supply and the implementation of a flood protection system [18].
The current condition of degradation in the Santa Bárbara Stream begins with the expansion of urban areas and changes in the natural characteristics of the environment. Some aspects can be highlighted as the land use and occupation occurring in a disorderly manner, the absence of a sanitary sewer system, resulting in the domestic and industrial release of contaminants, along with lack of environmental education [19].

2.2. Sampling Plants and Characterization

The collection of the emergent aquatic macrophytes (Figure 1) was performed in Santa Bárbara Stream, and the location (31o45’24.4” S, 52o21’22.1” W) was selected according to the presence of a large number of plants in the area, along with easy access to the riverbanks. The sampling occurred in the summer season, when presence of aquatic macrophytes is usually more visible, presenting the highest amount and diversity. The plants were sampled through the area and the biomass was placed in plastic bags and properly stored until in the laboratory. The plants (Table 1) were then washed and rinsed using distilled water to remove soil or sediment particles attached to plant biomass [20].

2.3. Detection of Nutrients and Heavy-Metal Content

The roots were separated from the shoots of the plants and the different portions were dried until achieving constant mass (approximately 48 h at 60 °C), and subsequently ground. The ground material was used for 3:1 nitric-perchloric acid digestion (HNO3-HClO4) following the methodology described by Tedesco [20], with approximately 15 hours in HNO3 and 5 hours in HClO4. We used a Micro Tube Kjeldahl digester block (LUCADEMA, Luca-23/02, Brazil) in a gas exhaust housing (Ideoxima ORG.10, Brazil), and the element levels were detected with Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (PerkinElmer®-Optima™ 8300 ICP-OES), at the Laboratory of Soil at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). We used internal standards [21] for quality control with limits of detection (LoD) of Cu—0.6; Zn—2.0; Cd—0.2; Cr—0.4; Ni—0.4; Pb—2.0 mg kg−1.

2.4. Indexes for Phytoremediation

The bioconcentration factor (BCF) and the translocation factor (TF) phytoremediation indexes were determined by applying Equations (1) and (2), respectively [22]:
BCF = level   in   roots level   in   environment
TF = level   in   shoots level   in   roots
where levels in roots refer to the concentration determined in the roots of the plants, in mg kg−1, the level in the environment refers to the concentration of the element in water (mg L−1), and the level in shoots refers to the concentration of the element in the shoots of the plants (mg kg−1)—aerial biomass.
In addition, we calculated the phytoremediation potential, in g ha−1. For this, firstly, we estimated the biomass production (Table 2) for each species, obtained from the area occupied by one plant and its total dry weight. Secondly, the phytoremoval potential was calculated by multiplying the biomass production by the total element levels (total mg kg−1).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data were analyzed using the Statistica® software program, v. 7.0. A Pearson’s analysis of correlation was run, along with cluster analysis (CA) using Ward’s linkage method based on the Euclidean distance, which produced a dendrogram with well-defined clusters.

3. Results

3.1. Total Content of Heavy Metals

Some guidelines values established by Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [23] described the usual/sufficient values and toxic/exceeding levels for general plants and were used as a comparative (Table 2). H. grumosa exceeded the sufficient levels for Cu (42.29 mg kg−1), Zn (298.13 mg kg−1), Cd (0.64 mg kg−1), Cr (21.28 mg kg−1), Ni (13.37 mg kg−1), and Pb (22.76 mg kg−1), presenting then total values that were between the toxic ranges, excepting Cd and Pb. Adapted from Demarco et al. [25]; Demarco et al. [26]; Demarco et al. [6].
The H. ranunculoides species was detected with copper levels up to two-fold higher than the highest toxic limit of 100 mg kg−1. Another outstanding ability detected for H. ranunculoides was the chromium total levels reaching almost six-fold higher than the highest toxic limit of 30 mg kg−1.
The species S. montevidensis was highlighted for copper total levels (145.39 mg kg−1), exceeding the toxic range for general plant species. This aquatic macrophyte presented Zn, Cr, and Ni levels standing among the toxic/exceeding levels for general plants. These results for S. montevidensis can be pointed out as demonstrating the plant with great capacity of tolerance for these toxic metals. S. montevidensis Cd and Pb levels were above sufficient. It might be mentioned that both heavy metals Cd and Pb are known for their lack in terms of biological function in plants and their toxic effects as oxidative stress [27]. Finally, E. anagallis presented Cu and Cr exceeding the toxic levels, with values of 125.61 mg kg−1 and 59.77 mg kg−1. Zn and Ni stayed among the toxic range.

3.2. Correlation Analysis

The correlation in H. grumosa regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals is shown in Table 3, which the strong positive correlation between K and Cu (r = 0.97), K and Ni (r = 0.96), S and Zn (r = 0.90), Cu and Ni (r = 0.92), and Cr and Pb (r = 0.99).
In the case of H. ranunculoides (Table 4), the highlighted positive correlation was among Cu and Zn (r = 0.99) and Cr and Ni (r = 0.99).
The S. montevidensis correlation matrix (Table 5) showed a strong positive correlation of P and Ca (r = 0.91), P and S (r = 0.94), P and Cr (r = 0.93), K and Cu (r = 0.99), K and Zn (r = 0.96), K and Cd (r = 0.96), Ca and S (r = 0.99), Ca and Cr (r = 0.95), S and Cr (r = 0.99), Cu and Zn (r = 0.99), Cu and Cd (r = 0.99), and Zn and Cd (r = 0.99). Thus, it might be mentioned that, unlike the other species, S. montevidensis demonstrated that heavy-metal uptake strongly correlated with nutrient uptake.
It can be seen that E. anagallis demonstrated a strong positive correlation among P and Ca (r = 0.92), P and S (r = 0.96), P and Cd (r = 0.93), Ca and S (r = 0.90), S and Cd (r = 0.96), Cu and Zn (r = 0.93), Zn and Pb (r = 0.96), and Cr and Ni (r = 0.93) (Table 6).

3.3. Phytoremediation Evaluation by Cluster Analysis

The phytoremediation indexes calculated allowed comparison between the plants for removing the toxic metals from Santa Bárbara Stream. Generally, the elements were grouped by BCF in two main groups (Figure 2a), one composed of Ca, Pb, K, and Cd, and the other presenting Ni, Cr, Zn, S, Mg, P, and Cu. H. ranunculoides has been classified separately from other species regarding BCF (Figure 2b). This species presented outstanding results for the studied heavy metals: Cu BCF = 667.09, Zn BCF = 149.93, Cd BCF = 26.85, Cr BCF = 31.77, Ni BCF = 35.47, and Pb BCF = 126.29 [25].
The cluster analysis regarding TF by element demonstrated two main groups, the first composed of Mg, Cd, Ni, S, P, K, and Zn, and the other by Ca, Cr, Pb, and Cu (Figure 3a). Plants with TF > 1.0 present the ability to translocate the element to the shoot’s tissues [22]. Therefore, when BCF > 1.0 and TF > 1.0, the mechanism performed is then known as phytoextraction. S. montevidensis and H. ranunculoides were grouped in Figure 3b regarding phytoremediation index TF. This fact may be justified by the characteristic of S. montevidensis and H. ranunculoides being identified as presenting the ability of maintaining high levels of elements mainly in their roots, since TF < 1.0. Therefore, phytoremediation mechanism performed by S. montevidensis and H. ranunculoides for Zn, Cu, Cr, Cd, Ni, and Pb is rhizofiltration.
The evaluation of phytoremoval potential was performed, aiming at the identification of the most promising plant species for application in phytoremediation technique, considering biomass production for removal estimation. The cluster analysis regarding phytoremoval potential by element demonstrated the formation of two groups, the first with the elements Cd, Pb, Zn, Cr, Ni, and S, and the second with Cu, Mg, K, Ca, and P (Figure 4a).
Both H. grumosa and S. montevidensis were grouped (Figure 3b), considering the outstanding potential found. It should be emphasized that H. grumosa presented great results for all the studied heavy metals, reaching values of 871.29 g ha−1 for Zn. This was quite similar to the value estimated for Zn removal by S. montevidensis, which was 754.01 g ha−1. In addition, S. montevidensis copper removal was detected at 466.20 g ha−1 and the results thus demonstrated the high tolerance of S. montevidensis to zinc and copper levels. Among the species, S. montevidensis was also detected with the highest values of Cr and Ni, being 72.31 g ha−1 and 42.25 g ha−1, respectively.
H. grumosa was also highlighted by Pb phytoremoval potential (66.52 g ha−1) and Cd (1.89 g ha−1). The Cd values, besides being less than the found for other heavy metals, represent potential for phytoremediation of cadmium, considering its toxicity and consequent damage to human and animal health [28,29].

4. Discussion

The Cr values detected for H. ranunculoides were impressively higher than other studies investigating the potential of different plants bioaccumulating this heavy metal from natural environments. The study of Tiwari et al. [30] investigating the biofiltration of heavy metals by Eichhornia crassipes in a contaminated watercourse in Bhopal, India, detected maximum chromium levels of 10.1 mg kg−1.
Regarding copper content, Melo et al. [31] studied the phytoremediation potential of spontaneous species in vineyard soils contaminated with copper and detected values in plants that were similar to those found in this study in H. ranunculoides. It was verified that, despite the study being performed in soil, more specifically in Inceptisol, the total levels of the highlighted species were with similar magnitude, being Lolium multiflorum (198.6 mg kg−1 of Cu), Cyperus compressus (276 mg kg−1 of Cu), and Chrysanthemum leucanthemum (160.3 mg kg−1 of Cu). The authors pointed out L. multiflorum potential for phytostabilization among the studied plant species, considering its dry matter production and ability to maintain the highest levels in its roots.
Regarding correlation analysis, Üçüncü et al. [32], studying the removal potential of Cu, Cr, and Pb by the aquatic macrophyte Lemna minor, found that Cr and Pb resembled each other in the time required for achieving the maximum removal rate (48 h), along with similar variations in contaminant levels during the experiment period (144 h). Thus, the authors obtained a high degree of correlation between these two metals.
Li et al. [33], performing a meta-analysis regarding Cu, Zn, and Cd uptake by aquatic plants, found that the ability of a given species to absorb a metal was strongly correlated with its ability to remove the other studied metals. However, the authors also identified other aspects such as the water pH, the morphology of plants (submerged or emerged), and the surface area exposed to water as highly influencing the uptake ability. The authors also identified a strong correlation between Cu and Zn, suggesting that the process of concentrating could be cooperative.
Considering the results found in BCF clustering analysis, the results found were higher than the BCF found by Afonso et al. [34] in a study aiming at the bioprospection of indigenous flora grown in copper-mining tailing areas for phytoremediation of metals. The BCF of Pb ranged from 0.4 by the species Juncus sp. to 16.4 in Solanum viarum Dunal. Regarding Cu, the species highlighted by the authors were Eryngium horridum Malme, Equisetum giganteum L., and Baccharis trimera, presenting values of BCF for Cu of 1.1, 1.5, and 1.8, respectively. Despite being somewhat lower, this species was highlighted by the authors considering its potential for Cu toleration and accumulation in its tissues, with impressive values of 440 mg kg−1, being thus indicated for phytoremediation application.
Diverging from the results of TF clustering, Gomez et al. [35] found Cu and Ni being translocated to the shoots of S. montevidensis. Regarding the mechanism of phytoremediation, rhizofiltration was also detected as the main mechanism performed by aquatic macrophyte plants in other studies. One example is the research conducted by Woraharn et al. [36], which pointed out Typha angustifolia as accumulating Cd and Zn levels mainly in roots, in all tested treatments of the experiment.
In the studied area, the Santa Bárbara stream, the application of aquatic macrophytes could be performed in a controlled form, using the systems of floating islands for water decontamination.

5. Conclusions

The studied plant species showed tolerance for Cu, Cr, Cd, Pb, Ni, and Zn, demonstrating potential for application in phytoremediation. Comparison between the bioconcentration factors allowed the identification of H. ranunculoides as presenting excellent results of accumulation. In addition, the study evaluated the phytoremoval potential of each plant, and the highlighted species were H. grumosa and S. montevidensis.
This study serves as a background for the application of aquatic macrophyte species for phytoremediation purposes and for a biofilter proposal as floating-island systems for wetland treatments that combine the application of living plants with floating devices for water decontamination. In addition, it also helps other researchers to apply these aquatic macrophyte species with excellent natural potential for remediating other aquatic environments worldwide.
The correct disposal of plant biomass after remediating a contaminated area is primordial to ensuring that the metals do not re-enter the systems, affecting other sites. This study recommends the investigation of alternatives to be explored, such as heat treatment which is followed by co-product generation. Among the treatments one can mention are pyrolysis and the production of new adsorbents such as activated carbon. In addition, we recommend the bioprospection of native species in studies aiming at the remediation of other areas worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.F.D. and R.A.; literature search and data analysis, C.F.D. and T.F.A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F.D. and R.A.; writing—review and editing, S.P. and R.A.; funding acquisition: F.C.S., F.M.M. and R.A.; supervision: R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance code 001, by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development), and FAPERGS (Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio Grande do Sul).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

E. anagallis, H. grumosa, H. ranunculoides, and S. montevidensis plants were used in this study. The plants were collected in a polluted area, where the municipal government of Pelotas perform periodical cleaning.

Abbreviations

E. anagallisEnydra anagallis
H. grumosaHymenachne grumosa
H. ranunculoidesHydrocotyle ranunculoides
S. montevidensisSagittaria montevidensis
HNO3 Nitric acid
HClO4Perchloric acid
ICP-OESInductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry
CuCopper
CrChromium
CdCadmium
PbLead
NiNickel
ZnZinc
PPhosphorus
KPotassium
CaCalcium
MgMagnesium
SSulfur
BCFBioconcentration Factor
TFTranslocation Factor

References

  1. Li, Q.G.; Liu, G.H.; Qi, L.; Wang, H.C.; Ye, Z.F.; Zhao, Q.L. Heavy metal-contained wastewater in China: Discharge, management and treatment. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2022, 808, 152091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Al Masum, A.; Bettman, N.; Read, S.; Hecker, M.; Brinkmann, M.; McPhedran, K. Urban stormwater runoff pollutant loadings: GIS land use classification vs. sample-based predictions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Renieri, E.A.; Safenkova, I.V.; Alegakis, A.Κ.; Slutskaya, E.S.; Kokaraki, V.; Kentouri, M.; Dzantiev, B.B.; Tsatsakis, A.M. Cadmium, lead and mercury in muscle tissue of gilthead seabream and seabass: Risk evaluation for consumers. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 124, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zaynab, M.; Al-Yahyai, R.; Ameen, A.; Sharif, Y.; Ali, L.; Fatima, M.; Khan, K.A.; Li, S. Health and environmental effects of heavy metals. J. King Saud Un. Sci. 2022, 34, 101653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Coração, A.C.D.S.; Santos, F.S.D.; Duarte, J.A.D.; Lopes-Filho, E.A.P.; De-Paula, J.C.; Rocha, L.M.; Krepsky, N.; Fiaux, S.B.; Teixeira, V.L. What do we know about the utilization of the Sargassum species as biosorbents of trace metals in Brazil? J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Demarco, C.F.; Afonso, T.F.; Pieniz, S.; Quadro, M.S.; De Oliveira Camargo, F.A.; Andreazza, R. Evaluation of Enydra anagallis remediation at a contaminated watercourse in south Brazil. Int. J. Phytorem. 2020, 22, 1216–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ugwu, E.I.; Othmani, A.; Nnaji, C.C. A review on zeolites as cost-effective adsorbents for removal of heavy metals from aqueous environment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 8061–8084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, F.; Jilani, G.; Fahim, R.; Bai, L.; Wang, C.; Tian, L.; Jiang, H. Functional and structural roles of wiry and sturdy rooted emerged macrophytes root functional traits in the abatement of nutrients and metals. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 249, 109330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oladoye, P.O.; Olowe, O.M.; Asemoloye, M.D. Phytoremediation technology and food security impacts of heavy metal contaminated soils: A review of literature. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garg, S.; Roy, A. Phytoremediation: An alternative approach for removal of dyes. In Phytoremediation; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 369–386. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shah, V.; Daverey, A. Phytoremediation: A multidisciplinary approach to clean up heavy metal contaminated soil. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 18, 100774. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kafle, A.; Timilsina, A.; Gautam, A.; Adhikari, K.; Bhattarai, A.; Aryal, N. Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. Environ. Adv. 2022, 8, 100203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yan, X.; Wang, J.; Song, H.; Peng, Y.; Zuo, S.; Gao, T.; Duan, X.; Qin, D.; Dong, J. Evaluation of the phytoremediation potential of dominant plant species growing in a chromium salt–producing factory wasteland, China. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2020, 27, 7657–7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Manorama Thampatti, K.C.; Beena, V.I.; Meera, A.V.; Ajayan, A.S. Phytoremediation of Metals by Aquatic Macrophytes. In Phytoremediation: In-situ Applications; Shmaefsky, B.R., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 153–204. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pires-Lira, M.F.; De Castro, E.M.; Lira, J.M.S.; De Oliveira, C.; Pereira, F.J.; Pereira, M.P. Potential of Panicum aquanticum Poir. (Poaceae) for the phytoremediation of aquatic environments contaminated by lead. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2020, 193, 110336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ansari, A.A.; Naeem, M.; Gill, S.S.; AlZuaibr, F.M. Phytoremediation of contaminated waters: An eco-friendly technology based on aquatic macrophytes application. Egyp. J. Aq. Res. 2020, 46, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. SANEP. Serviço Autônomo de Saneamento de Pelotas; Estações de Tratamento: Guaratuba, Brazil, 2019. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  18. SQA. Environmental Plan of Pelotas; Secretaria de Qualidade Ambiental: Areal, Brazil, 2013. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Korb, C.C.; Suertegaray, D.M.A. Identificação de depósitos tecnogênicos em um reservatório de abastecimento de água da cidade de Pelotas (RS). Quater. Environ. Geosci. 2014, 5, 33918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Análises de Solo, Plantas e Outros Materiais. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/362494561/Analise-de-solos-plantas-e-outros-materiais-Tedesco-et-al-1995-pdf# (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  21. De Andrade, L.C.; Tiecher, T.; De Oliveira, J.S.; Andreazza, R.; Inda, A.V.; De Oliveira Camargo, F.A. Sediment pollution in margins of the Lake Guaíba, Southern Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yoon, J.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Q.; Ma, L.Q. Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Pendias, H. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hopkins, W.G. Introduction to Plant Physiology, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2000; p. 512. [Google Scholar]
  25. Demarco, C.F.; Afonso, T.F.; Pieniz, S.; Quadro, M.S.; Camargo, F.A.; Andreazza, R. In situ phytoremediation characterization of heavy metals promoted by Hydrocotyle ranunculoides at Santa Bárbara stream, an anthropogenic polluted site in southern of Brazil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 28312–28321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Demarco, C.F.; Afonso, T.F.; Pieniz, S.; Quadro, M.S.; Camargo, F.A.D.O.; Andreazza, R. Phytoremediation of heavy metals and nutrients by the Sagittaria montevidensis into an anthropogenic contaminated site at Southern of Brazil. Int. J. Phytor. 2019, 21, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Małkowski, E.; Sitko, K.; Szopiński, M.; Gieroń, Ż.; Pogrzeba, M.; Kalaji, H.M.; Zieleźnik-Rusinowska, P. Hormesis in plants: The role of oxidative stress, auxins and photosynthesis in corn treated with Cd or Pb. Int. J. Molec. Scie. 2020, 21, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Souza-Arroyo, V.; Fabián, J.J.; Bucio-Ortiz, L.; Miranda-Labra, R.U.; Gomez-Quiroz, L.E.; Gutiérrez-Ruiz, M.C. The mechanism of the cadmium-induced toxicity and cellular response in the liver. Toxicology 2022, 480, 153339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, D.; Wang, P.; Zhao, F.J. Dietary cadmium exposure, risks to human health and mitigation strategies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tiwari, S.; Dixit, S.; Verma, N. An effective means of biofiltration of heavy metal contaminated water bodies using aquatic weed Eichhornia crassipes. Environ. Monit. Assess 2007, 129, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Melo, G.W.; Furini, G.; Brunetto, G.; Comin, J.J.; Simão, D.G.; Marques, A.C.R. Identification and phytoremediation potential of spontaneous species in vineyard soils contaminated with copper. Int. J. Phytor. 2021, 24, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Üçüncü, E.; Tunca, E.; Fikirdeşici, Ş.; Altındağ, A. Decrease and increase profile of Cu, Cr and Pb during stable phase of removal by duckweed (Lemna minor L.). Int. J. Phytor. 2013, 15, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, J.; Yu, H.; Luan, Y. Meta-analysis of the copper, zinc, and cadmium absorption capacities of aquatic plants in heavy metal-polluted water. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 14958–14973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Afonso, T.F.; Demarco, C.F.; Pieniz, S.; Quadro, M.S.; Camargo, F.A.; Andreazza, R. Bioprospection of indigenous flora grown in copper mining tailing area for phytoremediation of metals. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 256, 109953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gomez, B.M.; Reale, M.; El Kassisse, Y.; Mujica, C.; Gómez, C.; De Cabo, L.; Salemi, V.R. Metals uptake by Sagittaria montevidensis in contaminated riparian Area of Matanza-Riachuelo River (Argentina). SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Woraharn, S.; Meeinkuirt, W.; Phusantisampan, T.; Chayapan, P. Rhizofiltration of cadmium and zinc in hydroponic systems. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Studied aquatic macrophyte species: (a) Enydra anagallis; (b) Hydrocotyle ranunculoides; (c) Hymenachne grumosa; (d) Sagittaria montevidensis.
Figure 1. Studied aquatic macrophyte species: (a) Enydra anagallis; (b) Hydrocotyle ranunculoides; (c) Hymenachne grumosa; (d) Sagittaria montevidensis.
Sustainability 15 00419 g001
Figure 2. Dendrogram of heavy-metal and nutrient phytoremediation index BCF, demonstrating the clustering regarding (a) elements and (b) species categorization.
Figure 2. Dendrogram of heavy-metal and nutrient phytoremediation index BCF, demonstrating the clustering regarding (a) elements and (b) species categorization.
Sustainability 15 00419 g002
Figure 3. Dendrogram of heavy-metal and nutrient phytoremediation index TF, demonstrating the clustering regarding (a) elements and (b) species categorization.
Figure 3. Dendrogram of heavy-metal and nutrient phytoremediation index TF, demonstrating the clustering regarding (a) elements and (b) species categorization.
Sustainability 15 00419 g003
Figure 4. Dendrogram of in situ phytoremoval potential identified in the different aquatic macrophytes, demonstrating the clustering regarding (a) heavy metals and nutrients, and (b) species categorization.
Figure 4. Dendrogram of in situ phytoremoval potential identified in the different aquatic macrophytes, demonstrating the clustering regarding (a) heavy metals and nutrients, and (b) species categorization.
Sustainability 15 00419 g004
Table 1. Studied aquatic macrophyte species with family and common name, dry mass, and biomass production (ton ha−1).
Table 1. Studied aquatic macrophyte species with family and common name, dry mass, and biomass production (ton ha−1).
SpeciesFamilyCommon NameDry Mass (g)Biomass Production (ton ha−1)
Enydra anagallisAsteraceae2.580.56
Hydrocotyle ranunculoidesAraliaceaeFloating pennywort0.230.16
Hymenachne grumosaPoaceaeCarnivão11.692.92
Sagittaria montevidensisAlismataceaeGiant arrowhead20.043.20
Table 2. Reference values for general plants (in mg kg−1 dry mass, according with Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [23] and Hopkins [24] and total levels found in the aquatic macrophyte species, in mg kg −1.
Table 2. Reference values for general plants (in mg kg−1 dry mass, according with Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [23] and Hopkins [24] and total levels found in the aquatic macrophyte species, in mg kg −1.
Sufficient LevelToxic LevelH. grumosaH. ranunculoidesS. montevidensisE. anagallis
----------------------------------mg kg−1------------------------------
Cu5–30 [23]20–100 [23]42.29236.83145.39125.61
Zn27–150 [23]100–400 [23]298.13373.74235.16205.55
Cd0.05–0.2 [23]5–30 [23]0.640.750.551.28
Cr0.1–0.5 [23]5–30 [23]21.28179.3422.5559.77
Ni0.1–5 [23]10–100 [23]13.3783.4413.1734.66
Pb5–10 [23]30–300 [23]22.7633.3713.7525.76
-------- mmol kg−1-----------------------------------------g kg−1-----------------------------
P60 [24]-7.2317.0511.6310.64
K250 [24]-15.3235.3428.6529.15
Ca125 [24]-13.4825.920.620.85
Mg80 [24]-4.478.98.356.5
S30 [24]-6.8110.176.317.1
Table 3. Correlation analysis in H. grumosa regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
Table 3. Correlation analysis in H. grumosa regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
P KCaMgSCuZn CdCrNiPb
P1.00
K−0.041.00
Ca0.21−0.121.00
Mg0.800.510.171.00
S0.430.850.130.771.00
Cu−0.120.97−0.270.370.801.00
Zn0.440.830.210.880.900.701.00
Cd0.120.70−0.730.420.560.770.481.00
Cr0.670.04−0.190.710.16−0.080.420.341.00
Ni0.150.96-0.200.670.860.920.890.780.291.00
Pb0.73−0.08−0.060.700.10−0.210.370.190.990.171.00
Table 4. Correlation analysis in H. ranunculoides regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
Table 4. Correlation analysis in H. ranunculoides regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
P KCaMgSCuZn CdCrNiPb
P1.00
K0.121.00
Ca−0.170.061.00
Mg−0.62−0.070.871.00
S0.710.62−0.17−0.471.00
Cu0.42−0.420.19−0.11−0.191.00
Zn0.39−0.360.300.00−0.180.991.00
Cd−0.840.100.640.89−0.54−0.24−0.141.00
Cr−0.680.340.390.61−0.15−0.32−0.220.821.00
Ni−0.610.330.400.57−0.14−0.19−0.090.780.991.00
Pb−0.080.380.810.660.150.160.280.580.610.661.00
Table 5. Correlation analysis in S. montevidensis regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
Table 5. Correlation analysis in S. montevidensis regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
P KCaMgSCuZn CdCrNiPb
P1.00
K−0.981.00
Ca0.91−0.961.00
Mg−0.650.78−0.881.00
S0.94−0.980.99−0.871.00
Cu−1.000.99−0.920.68−0.951.00
Zn−0.990.96−0.850.59−0.890.991.00
Cd−0.990.96−0.870.57−0.900.990.991.00
Cr0.93−0.980.95−0.860.99−0.95−0.91−0.891.00
Ni−0.290.16−0.07−0.39−0.030.260.280.400.061.00
Pb−0.300.37−0.550.43−0.430.320.170.32−0.270.371.00
Table 6. Correlation analysis in E. anagallis regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
Table 6. Correlation analysis in E. anagallis regarding total levels of macronutrients and heavy metals.
P KCaMgSCuZn CdCrNiPb
P1.00
K−0.401.00
Ca0.92−0.601.00
Mg−0.63−0.34−0.411.00
S0.96−0.230.90−0.751.00
Cu0.37−0.250.520.190.371.00
Zn0.49−0.600.690.260.420.931.00
Cd0.93−0.170.87−0.640.960.580.571.00
Cr−0.100.81−0.15−0.460.150.13−0.190.221.00
Ni−0.470.87−0.48−0.17−0.23−0.01−0.34−0.150.931.00
Pb0.57−0.780.790.220.480.790.960.56−0.36−0.521.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demarco, C.F.; Afonso, T.F.; Pieniz, S.; Selau, F.C.; Machado, F.M.; Andreazza, R. Potential Phytoremediation of Aquatic Macrophyte Species for Heavy Metals in Urban Environments in the Southern Area of Brazil. Sustainability 2023, 15, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010419

AMA Style

Demarco CF, Afonso TF, Pieniz S, Selau FC, Machado FM, Andreazza R. Potential Phytoremediation of Aquatic Macrophyte Species for Heavy Metals in Urban Environments in the Southern Area of Brazil. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demarco, Carolina Faccio, Thays França Afonso, Simone Pieniz, Filipe Carlos Selau, Fernando Machado Machado, and Robson Andreazza. 2023. "Potential Phytoremediation of Aquatic Macrophyte Species for Heavy Metals in Urban Environments in the Southern Area of Brazil" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop