• Monodopsis subterranea
References [ 8 ]
Day JG (1998) Cryo-conservation of microalgae and cyanobacteria. CryoLetters S1: 7-14.
DOI: none
Slocombe SP, Ross M, Thomas N, McNeill S & Stanley M (2013) A rapid and general method for measurement of protein in micro-algal biomass. Bioresource Technology 129: 51-57.
Chen C-Y, Yeh K-L, Aisyah R, Lee D-J & Chang J-S (2011) Cultivation, photobioreactor design and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: A critical review. Bioresource Technology 102: 71-81.
Maity JP, Bundschuh J, Chen CY & Bhattacharya P (2014) Microalgae for third generation biofuel production, mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and wastewater treatment: Present and future perspectives - A mini review. Energy 78: 104-113.
Kiran B, Kumar R & Deshmukh D (2014) Perspectives of microalgal biofuels as a renewable source of energy. Energy Conversion and Management 88: 1228-1244.
Rampen SW, Datema M, Rodrigo-Gámiz M, Schouten S, Reichart GJ & Sinninghe Damsté JS (2014) Sources and proxy potential of long chain alkyl diols in lacustrine environments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 144: 59-71.
Slocombe SP, Zhang QY, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa A, Rad Menéndez C, Campbell CN, Black KD, Stanley MS & Day JG (2015) Unlocking nature's treasure-chest: Screening for oleaginous algae. Scientific Reports 5: 09844.
Laudicella VA, Beveridge C, Carboni S, Franco SC, Doherty MK, Long N, Mitchell E, Stanley MS, Whitfield PD & Hughes AD (2020) Lipidomics analysis of juveniles’ blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L. 1758), a key economic and ecological species PLoS ONE 15(2): e0223031.
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Eustigmatophyceae Order: Eustigmatales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: 3N-BBM+V; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture and cryopreserved; or BG11 medium
Attributes
Authority(Petersen) Hibberd 1981
IsolatorLewin (1949)
Collection Siterock surface river at Marion, Connecticut, USA
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area North America
Country USA
Environment Freshwater
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1949
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 616548
Equivalent StrainsATCC 30593,SAG 848-1,UTEX 151

CCAP 848/1

Monodopsis subterranea


Related Products

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>CONCENTRATED STOCKS

CCAP FA3N-C
3N-BBM+V Medium
CONCENTRATED STOCKS

Non-sterile concentrated stocks to make up 5 litres of 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>1 LITRE PREMADE

CCAP FA3N-P
3N-BBM+V Medium
1 LITRE PREMADE

1 litre of sterile, ready to use, 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for culturing freshwater