toxins
Article
Chemical Composition, Phytotoxic, Antimicrobial
and Insecticidal Activity of the Essential Oils of
Dracocephalum integrifolium
Shixing Zhou 1,2 , Caixia Wei 1,2 , Chi Zhang 3 , Caixia Han 1 , Nigora Kuchkarova 1,2 and
Hua Shao 1,2, *
1
2
3
*
CAS Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and
Geography, Urumqi 830011, China; zhoushixing16@mails.ucas.ac.cn (S.Z.);
weicaixia16@mails.ucas.ac.cn (C.W.); cxhani@ms.xjb.ac.cn (C.H.); nkn.bell.ixrv@mail.ru (N.K.)
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection,
College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China; zc@ms.xjb.ac.cn
Correspondence: shaohua@ms.xjb.ac.cn
Received: 25 September 2019; Accepted: 10 October 2019; Published: 13 October 2019
Abstract: The present investigation studied the chemical composition of the essential oils extracted
from Dracocephalum integrifolium Bunge growing in three different localities in northwest China and
evaluated the phytotoxic, antimicrobial and insecticidal activities of the essential oils as well as
their major constituents, i.e., sabinene and eucalyptol. GC/MS analysis revealed the presence of
21–24 compounds in the essential oils, representing 94.17–97.71% of the entire oils. Monoterpenes
were the most abundant substances, accounting for 85.30–93.61% of the oils; among them, sabinene
(7.35—14.0%) and eucalyptol (53.56–76.11%) were dominant in all three oils, which occupied
67.56–83.46% of the total oils. In general, phytotoxic bioassays indicated that the IC50 values of the oils
and their major constituents were below 2 µL/mL (1.739–1.886 mg/mL) against Amaranthus retroflexus
and Poa annua. Disc diffusion method demonstrated that the oils and their major constituents possessed
antimicrobial activity against Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, and Candida albicans, with MIC values ranging from 5–40 µL/mL (4.347–37.712 mg/mL).
The oils, sabinene and eucalyptol also exhibited significant pesticidal activity, with the mortality rates
of Aphis pomi reaching 100% after exposing to 10 µL oil/petri dish (8.694–9.428 mg/petri dish) for
24 h. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the chemical composition, phytotoxic,
antimicrobial and insecticidal activity of the essential oils extracted from D. integrifolium; it is
noteworthy to mention that this is also the first report on the phytotoxicity of one of the major
constituents, sabinene. Our results imply that D. integrifolium oils and sabinene have the potential
value of being further exploited as natural pesticides.
Keywords: Dracocephalum integrifolium Bunge; essential oil; sabinene; phytotoxic activity;
antimicrobial activity; insecticidal activity
Key Contribution: (1) Eucalyptol and sabinene are the major constituents of Dracocephalum
integrifolium essential oil; (2) D. integrifolium oils and their major constituents exhibited significant
phytotoxic activity against Amaranthus retroflexus and Poa annua with IC50 values < 2 µL/mL;
(3) D. integrifolium oils and their major constituents possessed antimicrobial activity against 5 test
strains with MIC values ranging from 5–40 µL/mL; (4) D. integrifolium oils and their major constituents
killed Aphis pomi at 10 µL/petri dish after 24 h of exposure.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598; doi:10.3390/toxins11100598
www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
2 of 19
1. Introduction
Yield losses caused by agricultural pests including arthropods, diseases, and weeds are estimated
to account for about 35% in major crops worldwide [1]. Synthetic chemical pesticides are widely
accepted in prevention of diseases and insect pests in crop growth; however, extensive application
of synthetic chemicals has led to the development of resistance in insects and weeds [2,3]. Besides,
wide use of synthetic pesticides has also caused many problems including the acute and chronic
toxicity to human and mammals, as well as adverse and residual effects on the environment [4].
Traditionally, numerous plant products have a record of safe application in various industries [5].
Plant derived substances, including essential oils, have been an increasing interest in search of
alternatives to chemical pesticides because of their innate biodegrade ability, minimal effects
on non-target organisms and the environment [6,7]. In fact, essential oils as well as oil
constituents/derivatives have successfully been commercialized as environment friendly pesticides
such as clove oil, eucalyptol and so on [8,9].
The genus Dracocephalum (family Labiates) consists of around 60 annual or perennial herbs
that distributes widely in Southern Europe and temperate Asia, with 32 species and 7 varieties can
be found growing in China [10,11]. A literature survey of the chemical composition of essential
oils produced by Dracocephalum plants revealed the presence of remarkable variations among their
major constituents [12]. These oils were found to possess various biological activities such as
antimicrobial [13–20], antioxidant [13,17,19,21–23], insecticidal [24,25], phytotoxic [26,27], cytotoxic [17],
antispasmodic [28] and antinociceptive [29] activity.
Among various Dracocephalum species, D. integrifolium Bunge is an aromatic plant that has been
used traditionally as an important medicinal herb known as “Marzan Juxi” in Uighur in treating cough
and asthmadistributes in Central Asia [30]. Phytochemical study indicated that this plant mainly
contains flavonoids, volatile oils, lactones and other compounds [11]. So far, there are no reports on
the chemical composition and biological activities of the essential oil of D. integrifolium. In this study,
we aim to: (i) analyze the phytochemical profile of the essential oils extracted from D. integrifolium
growing in 3 different localities in northwest China; (ii) evaluate the phytotoxic, antimicrobial and
pesticidal activities of these essential oils as well as their major constituents. The possibility of utilizing
the essential oils and their major constituents as environment friendly pesticides is also discussed.
2. Results
2.1. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils
The yield of the essential oils obtained from stems and leaves of D. integrifolium harvested from
three different localities was 0.17% (DI1), 0.16% (DI2), and 0.17% (DI3). In total 24, 21 and 21 compounds
were identified from DI1, DI2 and DI3 essential oils, representing 97.71%, 95.71%, and 94.17% of the
entire oil, respectively (Table 1). Sabinene and eucalyptol were the most abundant constituents in all
3 oils, with the content of sabinene ranging from 7.35% to 14.0%, and eucalyptol ranging from 53.56% to
76.11%; these 2 compounds occupied 67.56%, 83.46%, 75.66% of the DI1, DI2 and DI3 oils, respectively
(Figures 1–3). Monoterpenes were overwhelmingly dominant, accounting for 85.30%, 93.61%, 86.12%
of the DI1, DI2 and DI3 oils. The following compounds, α-thujene, α-pinene, sabinene, α-terpinene,
eucalyptol, β-ocimene, γ-terpinene, L-pinocarveol, terpinen-4-ol, myrtenal and caryophyllene oxide
can be found in all 3 oils, whereas o-cymene, 3-carene, β-elemene, aromadendrene, β-copaene,
cis-α-bisabolene, β-bisabolene, nerolidol and α-bisabolol were unique in DI1 oil, isopinocamphone,
α-terpineol, myrtenol and epizonarene were found only in DI2 oil, and β-thujene, (+)-ledol were
present only in DI3 oil.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
3 of 19
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oils obtained from D. integrifolium plants growing in
three different localities.
Serial No.
Compound Name
RIa
RIb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
α-Thujene
α-Pinene
Sabinene
β-Myrcene
β-Pinene
β-Thujene
α-Terpinene
o-Cymene
Eucalyptol
3-Carene
β-Ocimene
γ-Terpinene
Terpinolene
Linalool
L-Pinocarveol
Isopinocamphone
Terpinen-4-ol
Myrtenal
α-Terpineol
Myrtenol
α-Copaene
β-elemene
Aromadendrene
β-copaene
Germacrene D
cis-α-Bisabolene
γ-Muurolene
β-Bisabolene
δ-Cadinene
Epizonarene
Nerolidol
Caryophyllene oxide
(+)-ledol
Cubenol
α-Bisabolol
Monoterpene
hydrocarbons
Oxygenated
monoterpenes
Sesquiterpene
hydrocarbons
Oxygenated
sesquiterpenes
Total identified
Numbers of
compounds
Yield (%, V/W)
913
918
958
968
976
996
1002
1006
1013
1022
1033
1041
1070
1080
1110
1137
1151
1156
1163
1169
1359
1373
1397
1456
1456
1483
1489
1489
1498
1498
1540
1546
1559
1582
1657
924
935
954
969
975
978
1016
1018
1030
1031
1035
1056
1079
1098
1139
1162
1177
1190
1198
1206
1372
1392
1419
1459
1451
1495
1477
1505
1519
1495
1554
1543
1550
1601
1691
Area (%)
DI1
DI2
DI3
Average
1.87
1.84
14
4.49
0.28
3.66
53.56
0.61
1.09
1.01
0.61
0.62
0.84
0.82
1.24
0.61
0.7
1.51
0.54
0.55
0.63
2.94
2.27
1.42
28.85
0.98
0.67
7.35
0.11
1.4
0.21
76.11
0.23
0.53
0.13
0.97
1.27
1.08
1.09
0.75
0.73
0.49
0.22
0.2
0.64
0.55
11.61
1.07
1.83
10.11
2.76
0.17
0.23
65.55
0.7
0.73
0.1
0.71
0.72
0.68
0.76
0.56
1.09
0.39
0.35
2.83
1.99
0.84
17.7
1.31
1.45
10.49
2.30
2.08
0.17
0.24
3.66
65.07
0.61
0.67
0.76
0.12
0.66
0.77
1.27
0.87
0.89
0.75
0.73
0.90
0.61
0.70
1.51
0.79
0.54
0.31
0.55
0.49
0.20
2.94
1.91
1.99
0.70
1.42
19.39
56.45
82
68.42
68.96
5.78
0.91
2.39
3.03
6.63
1.19
5.66
4.49
97.71
24
95.71
21
94.17
21
95.86
22.00
0.17
0.16
0.17
0.17
RIa Retention index measured relative to n-alkanes (C7 –C40 ) using DB-5MS column. RIb Retention index
from literature.
O
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
4 of 19
O
sabinene
eucalyptol
O
sabinene
eucalyptol
80
sabinene
60
eucalyptoleucalyptol
Figure 1. Chemical structures of sabinene and eucalyptol.
40
80
sabinene
20
eucalyptol
60
80
400 sabinene
1 3 5 7
60
9 11 13eucalyptol
15 17 19 21
23 25 27 29
20
31 33 35
40 sabinene
DI1
DI2
DI3
0
20 1 3 5 7 9 11
13 15 17 19
21 23 25 27
29 31 33 35
0
DI1
DI2
DI3
1 3 5 7
9 11 13 15
17 19
Figure 2. Comparison of the chemical composition
of D.
essential oils collected from three
21integrifolium
23 25 27 29
31 33 35
different localities.
DI1
DI2
DI3
Sabinene
Eucalyptol
80
60
40
20
80
0
60
Sabinene
DI1
DI2
DI3Sabinene
Eucalyptol
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Eucalyptol
40
Figure 3. Comparison
of the percentage of the major constituents of D. integrifolium essential oils
80
Eucalyptol
collected from 3 different
localities.
20
60
Sabinene
0 of the Essential Oils and their Major Constituents
2.2. Phytotoxic Activity
40
DI1
DI2
DI3
Phytotoxic activity of the essential oils (concentrations tested ranged
from 0.125 to 5 µL/mL,
Eucalyptol
20
0.109–4.714 mg/mL) as well as their major constituents was determined
Sabinene by comparing their plant
regulatory effect on0 shoot and root length of two receiver plants, i.e., A. retroflexus and P. annua.
DI3
At the lowest concentrationDI1
tested (0.125DI2
µL/mL, 0.91–0.938
mg/mL), all 3 oils significantly promoted
root elongation of A. retroflexus; however, sabinene, eucalyptol and their mixture did not exert any
promotive activity. With the increase of concentration, inhibitory effects were observed when oils
were applied starting from 0.5–1 µL/mL (0.455–0.938 mg/mL), whereas the effective dose for sabinene,
eucalyptol and their mixture was 2 µL/mL (1.739 mg/mL), 0.25 µL/mL (0.236 mg/mL), and 0.5 µL/mL
(0.457 mg/mL), respectively. In fact, 2 µL/mL (1.739–1.886 mg/mL) oils or the major constituents resulted
in over 50% reduction on root length: DI1, DI2, DI3 oils inhibited root elongation of A. retroflexus by
μ
μ
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
5 of 19
μ
Shoot length (cm) of Amaranthus retroflexus
86.5%, 100%, 100%, meanwhile sabinene, eucalyptol and their mixture exerted 66.7%, 63.0%, and 76.0%
reduction on root length of A. retroflexus, respectively. At the highest concentration tested (5 µL/mL,
4.347–4.714 mg/mL), seed germination of A. retroflexus was markedly inhibited by the oils and the
major constituents. Shoot growth responded similarly to the oils and the major constituents but to a
lesser extent (Figures 4 and 5).
2.5
2.0
0μL/mL
aaaa
ab
0.125μL/mL
aa
a
c
b
0.25μL/mL
aa
a
a
0.5μL/mL
aa
a
1μL/mL 2μL/mL 5μL/mL
aaa
a
a
a
a a
bb
b
1.5
b
1.0
c
0.5
c
c
bb
c
d
0.0
dd
DI1
d
cc
DI2
DI3
d
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
Figure 4. Phytotoxic effects of the essential oils of D. integrifolium and their major constituents, sabinene,
eucalyptol, and their mixture on root growth of A. retroflexus examined by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and
analyzed using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05 level. Each value is the mean of five replicates ± SE
(n = 50). Means with different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level according to
Fisher’s LSD test.
Shoot length (cm) of Amaranthus retroflexus
2.5
2.0
0μL/mL
0.125μL/mL
0.25μL/Ml
a a
a a a a
ab
a
c
b
a a
a
a
a a
0.5μL/mL
a
1μL/mL
a a a
a
a
2μL/mL
a
a
bb
b
1.5
a
5μL/mL
b
1.0
c
0.5
c
c
bb
c
d
0.0
dd
d
DI1
DI2
d
c c
DI3
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
Figure 5. Phytotoxic effects of the essential oils of D. integrifolium and their major constituents, sabinene,
eucalyptol, and their mixture on shoot growth of A. retroflexus examined by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and
analyzed using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05 level. Each value is the mean of five replicates ± SE
(n = 50). Means with different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level according to
Fisher’s LSD test.
6.0
0μL/mL
5.0
a
a
0.125μL/mL
0.25μL/mL
0.5μL/mL
1μL/mL
2μL/mL
5μL/mL
Shoot length (cm) of
1.0
c
0.5
c
c
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
6 of 19
bb
c
Similarly, DI1 and DI2 oils significantly stimulated root growth of the other tested species, the
d
monocot plant P. annua; DI3 oil, on the contrary, exhibited obvious phytotoxic activity starting from
d
d
dd
c c
the lowest
concentration tested, 0.125 µL/mL (0.117 mg/mL). For sabinene, eucalyptol and their
0.0
DI1 plant growth
DI2 suppressive
DI3effect canEucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
µL/mL
mixture, significant
be detected starting
from 0.25–0.5
(0.217–0.471 mg/mL). Like A. retroflexus, over 50% reduction on root length was triggered by 2 µL/mL
(1.739–1.886 mg/mL) oils or the major constituents: the inhibition rates of 3 oils on root length of P. annua
were 65.8% (DI1), 100% (DI2) and 80.5% (DI3), respectively, whilst at the same concentration, seedling
height were reduced to 61%, 100% and 65.3% of the control, respectively. When the concentration
reached 5 µL/mL (4.347–4.714 mg/mL), seed germination of P. annua was basically completely prohibited
(Figures 6 and 7).
6.0
0μL/mL
Root length (cm) of Poa annua
5.0
a
a
0.125μL/mL
0.25μL/mL
0.5μL/mL
1μL/mL
2μL/mL
5μL/mL
a
a
ab
4.0
c
b
3.0
c
c
1.0
d
DI1
bc
b
d
b
c
c
c
d
d
ee
DI2
aaa
a
b
b
2.0
d
a
ab
b
c
c
0.0
aa
a
e
DI3
dd
Eucalyptol
d
d
Sabinene
e
Mixture
Figure 6. Phytotoxic effects of the essential oils of D. integrifolium and their major constituents, sabinene,
eucalyptol, and their mixture on root growth of P. annua examined by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and analyzed
using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05 level. Each value is the mean of five replicates ± SE (n = 50).
Means with different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level according to Fisher’s
LSD test.
Strength of the phytotoxic activity was compared by calculating the IC50 values for the oils and the
major constituents (Figure 8). Among the three oils, DI3 showed the most potent phytotoxic activity
on root growth of both receiver species, whereas DI1 exhibited the weakest activity. Slight promotive
activity of the mixture of sabinene and eucalyptol was observed on root elongation of A. retroflesus and
shoot growth of both test species.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
6.0
a
abab
6.0
5.0
ShootShoot
lengthlength
(cm) (cm)
of Poa
of annua
7 of 19
abab
5.0
4.0
a
0μL/mL
ab
ab
a0μL/mL
a
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
4.0
3.0
b
c
3.0
2.0
0.125μL/mL
a
0.125μL/mL
ab ab
a
b
ab ab
1μL/mL
2μL/mL
5μL/mL
0.5μL/mL a 1μL/mL
ab
a bc
aa
a b
ab cd
bc d
b
cd
d
2μL/mL
a
5μL/mL
0.25μL/mL
aa
b
b
0.5μL/mL
a
a b
b
c
c
cc
e
cc
d
DI1
0.0
d
DI1
cc
DI2 c c
DI3
DI2
DI3
d
d
e
1.0
0.0
b
b c
c
b
c
2.0
1.0
0.25μL/mL
e
d
dd
e f
f
d
dd
Eucalyptol
Sabinene f
Mixture f
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
Figure 7. Phytotoxic effects of the essential oils of D. integrifolium and their major constituents, sabinene,
eucalyptol, and their mixture on shoot growth of P. annua examined by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and analyzed
using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05 level. Each value is the mean of five replicates ± SE (n = 50).
Means with different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level according to Fisher’s
LSD test.
2.5
2.5
IC50 IC50
(μL/mL)
(μL/mL)
2
DI1
DI2
DI3
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
DI1
DI2
DI3
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
2
1.5
1.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
0
A. retroflexus Root
P. annua Root
A. retroflexu Shoot P. annua Shoot
0
Figure 8. IC50
of D. integrifolium
essential
oils and
major constituents,
sabinene,
eucalyptol,
A.values
retroflexus
Root P. annua
Root
A. their
retroflexu
Shoot P. annua
Shoot
and their mixture on root and shoot length of A. retroflexus and P. annua.
2.3. Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oils and Their Major Constituents
Disc diffusion method demonstrated that the essential oils and their major constituents had
suppressive effect on tested microorganisms. In general, DI2 oil showed the strongest activity against
the tested strains compared with other oils; meanwhile, the major constituents were also very effective;
for example, sabinene resulted in the largest inhibition zone (6.63 cm) in the assay (Table 2).
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
8 of 19
Table 2. Mean radius of inhibition zones (cm) of the essential oils and their major constituents tested
against five microbial stains.
Essential Oils/
Major Constituents
E. coli
B. subtillis
P. aeruginosa
S. cerevisiae
C. albicans
DI1
DI2
DI3
Sabinene
Eucalyptol
Mixture
1.08 ± 0.08
1.55 ± 0.05
1.15 ± 0.05
1.15 ± 0.05
1.78 ± 0.38
1.83 ± 0.03
2.13 ± 0.43
2.30 ± 0.10
2.15 ± 0.00
3.08 ± 0.08
3.03 ± 0.08
2.10 ± 0.00
1.30 ± 0.10
1.85 ± 0.05
1.65 ± 0.05
1.58 ± 0.03
1.18 ± 0.03
1.55 ± 0.05
2.75 ± 0.40
3.83 ± 0.13
3.53 ± 0.28
6.63 ± 0.03
1.95 ± 0.05
3.60 ± 0.00
2.55 ± 0.15
2.90 ± 0.05
3.05 ± 0.05
3.35 ± 0.05
2.03 ± 0.23
2.48 ± 0.18
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of D. integrifolium oils and their major constituents was
also evaluated in order to assess the strength of their antimicrobial activity (Table 3). B. subtillis turned
out to be the most sensitive microorganism with the lowest MIC values (5 µL/mL, 4.347–4.714 mg/mL)
for the oils and the major constituents; in comparison, S. cerevisiae was the most tolerant strain,
with MIC values of 40 µL/ mL for sabinene (34.776 mg/mL) and the mixture of sabinene and eucalyptol
(36.576 mg/mL).
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory consentration (MIC) of the essential oils and their major constituents
tested against 5 microbial stains.
Essential Oils/
Major Constituents
E. coli
B. subtillis
P. aeruginosa
S. cerevisiae
C. albicans
DI1
DI2
DI3
Eucalyptol
Sabinene
Mixture
10
10
15
15
20
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
15
10
10
15
15
10
15
20
40
40
10
10
5
10
15
10
2.4. Pesticidal Activity of Essential Oils and their Major Constituents
The insecticidal effect of D. integrifolium oils against A. pomi was summarized in Figures 9–14.
Results showed that all three essential oils as well as the major constituents posed toxic effect on
A. pomi, and higher mortality was observed as the doses of essential oils and exposure period increased.
After 48 h exposure to the oils at 2 µL/petri dish (1.820–1.876 mg/petri dish), the mortality rates
of A. pomi were 56.0%, 72.6% and 78.3%, respectively; and when the concentration reached 10 µL
(9.100–9.380 mg), the mortality rates were 100% for all 3 oils after 24 h exposure. In order to compare
the strength of the oils, LC50 and LC90 values were calculated and the results were as follows: LC50
values were 3.103 (2.824 mg) and 0.975 (0.887mg) µL/petri dish after 24h, 48h of exposure for DI1
oil, 1.621 (1.499 mg) and 0.702 (0.649 mg) µL/petri dish for DI2 oil, and 1.953 (1.832 mg) and 0.652
(0.612 mg) µL/petri dish for DI3 oil, respectively, whereas the LC90 values after 24 h and 48 h exposure
were 30.826(28.03 mg) and 6.231(5.67mg) µL/petri dish, 8.32 (7.696 mg) and 4.604 (4.259 mg) µL/petri
dish, 8.185 (7.678 mg) and 3.115 (2.922 mg) µL/petri dish, respectively. In general, DI2 and DI3 oils had
stronger effect against A. pomi compared with DI1 oil.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
9 of 19
Sabinene, eucalyptol and their mixture also exhibited strong insecticidal effect. Among them,
sabinene showed the most potent effect on A. pomi with LC50 and LC90 values of 0.667 (0.579 mg) and
1.86 (1.617 mg) μ
µL/petri dish after 24 h exposure, and 2 μ
µL/petri dish (1.739 mg/petri dish) treatment
μ motality. The mixture of sabinene and
μ eucalyptol affected A. pomi with LC and
resulted in 100%
50
LC90 values of 0.262 (0.239 mg) and 1.161 (1.062 mg) µL/petri
dish after 48 h exposure. When the
μ
concentration reached 5 µLμ(4.347–4.714 mg), the motalityμrate of eucalyptol, sabinene and their mixture
μ
reached 100% after 48 h exposure.
All the compounds can kill all of test insects after 24 h at the dose of
10 µL/petri dish
μ (8.694–9.428 mg/petri dish).
μ
Percentagesofofmortality
mortalityofofDI1
DI1
Percentages
1.2
1.2
0μL
0μL
0.25μL
0.25μL
0.5μL
0.5μL
1μL
1μL
2μL
2μL
5μL
5μL
10μL
10μL
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 0
0
24h
24h
48h
48h
Figure 9. Percent mortality of A. pomi adults after treatment with essential oil of DI1 according to doses
exposure and treatment times.
Percentagesofofmortality
mortalityofofDI2
DI2
Percentages
1.2
1.2
1
1
0μL
0μL
0.25μL
0.25μL
0.5μL
0.5μL
1μL
1μL
2μL
2μL
5μL
5μL
10μL
10μL
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 0
0
24h
24h
48h
48h
Figure 10. Percent mortality of A. pomi adults after treatment with essential oil of DI2 according to
doses exposure and treatment times.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
10 of 19
Percentages
of of
mortality
of of
DI3
Percentages
mortality
DI3
1.2
1.2
0μL
0μL
0.25μL
0.25μL
0.5μL
0.5μL
1μL
1μL
2μL
2μL
5μL
5μL
10μL
10μL
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 0
0
24h
24h
48h
48h
Percentages
of of
mortality
of of
eucalyptol
Percentages
mortality
eucalyptol
Figure 11. Percent mortality of A. pomi adults after treatment with essential oil of DI3 according to
doses exposure and treatment times.
1.2
1.2
1
1
0μL
0μL
0.25μL
0.25μL
0.5μL
0.5μL
1μL
1μL
2μL
2μL
5μL
5μL
10μL
10μL
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 0
24h
48h
0
24h
48h
Figure 12. Percent mortality of A. pomi adults after treatment with essential oil of eucalyptol according
to doses exposure and treatment times.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
11 of 19
Percentages
mortality
sabinene
Percentages
ofof
mortality
ofof
sabinene
1.2
1.2
0μL
0μL
0.25μL
0.25μL
0.5μL
0.5μL
1μL
1μL
2μL
2μL
5μL
5μL
10μL
10μL
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 0
0
24h
24h
48h
48h
Figure 13. Percent mortality of A. pomi adults after treatment with sabinene according to doses exposure
and treatment times.
Percentages
mortality
mixture
Percentages
ofof
mortality
ofof
mixture
1.2
1.2
0μL
0μL
0.25μL
0.25μL
0.5μL
0.5μL
1μL
1μL
2μL
2μL
5μL
5μL
10μL
10μL
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 0
0
24h
24h
48h
48h
Figure 14. Percent mortality of A. pomi adults after treatment with of eucalyptol and sabinene mixture
(65.1: 10.5) according to doses exposure and treatment times.
3. Discussion
The chemical composition of essential oils produced by a number of Dracocephalum species
have been reported, especially D. moldavica and D. kotschyi, mostly because of their important
value as traditional medical herbs [19–21,27,28,31,32]. Suleimen et al. [26] investigated the chemical
composition of D. peregrinum and detected 1, 8-cineol (synonym for eucalyptol, 18.5%), α-pinene (8.4%),
α
limonene (5.8%), β-caryophyllene oxide (5.5%), and spathulenol (3.3%) as the major constituents;
α
β
however, the major constituents
of
some
other
Dracocephalum
species
differ
greatly
from
D.
integrifolium.
β
Mahmood et al. [12] found citronellol (74.9%), Citronellal (6.7%) and Citronellyl formate (6.7%) were
abundant in D. heterophyllum oil; Nezhadali et al. [18] reported that the major constituents of the
essential oil obtained from D. subcapitatum were geranial (63.4%), limonene (23.4%), p-Menth-1-en-9-ol
(4.4%) and caryophyllene E (4.3%). Various factors such as geographic locality and surrounding climate,
species variety or ecotype, seasonal variations, stress, post-harvest processing, etc. might influence
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
12 of 19
the chemical profile of essential oils [33] In terms of D. integrifolium, VOCs released by powdered dry
plant materials were studied by Liu et al. [30] using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)
combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method, and eucalyptol and cymene
were discovered as the most abundant ingredients. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first
to report the chemical profile of the essential oil of D. integrifolium, with eucalyptol and sabinene being
the dominant compounds in the oils; both compounds are common constituents of plant essential oils
and have been demonstrated to attribute to certain biological activities of the oils.
Essential oils are produced by plants from the family Compositae, Umbelliferae, etc., that function
as pollinator attractants, determinants of vegetation patterning or regulatory factor of community
structure via allelopathy [34]. Further study revealed that essential oils possess various biological
activities such as antioxidant, cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial activity, etc. [35,36]. In terms
of the phytotoxic activity of essential oils produced by Dracocephalum species, there was one single
report on the significant allelopathic activity of the essential oil produced by a new chemotype of
D. kotschyi that was characterized with abundant limonene-10-al and limonene [27]. D. integrifolium
has the ability to emit phytotoxic volatile compounds into the environment, indicating the possible
involvement of allelopathy in its competition against neighboring plants. Allelopathy refers to any
direct and indirect harmful or beneficial effect by one plant on another through the production of
chemical compounds that are released into environment, which is often found to contribute to successful
establishment of dominance in a certain habitat [37,38]. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy to mention that
the mechanism of allelopathy is rather complicated and may be very difficult to be confirmed, mainly
because of the uncertainty of the fate of the potential volatile allelochemicals after they are released
into the environment. On the one hand, these compounds might act directly as phytotoxins to affect
other plants’ growth if they can accumulate to effective doses in the soil; on the other hand, they might
indirectly impact on neighbor’s growth by altering the soil’s physico-chemical properties as well as the
community structure and function of soil biota [39,40].
In most cases biological activities of a particular essential oil is determined by one or two of its
major components, however synergistic effect may occur in other circumstances [33,41]. Essential oil
constituents such as eucalyptol, camphor, β-myrcene, limonene, thymol, geraniol, α- and β-pinene,
bornyl acetate, citronellal, menthol, borneol and a-terpineol, etc. have been found to exhibit plant
growth inhibitory activity [42,43]. Eucalyptol and sabinene are common components present in a
number of essential oils [44–49]. So far, there is no report on the phytotoxicity of sabinene, therefore
we are the first to study this biological activity of this compound; however, there are some essential
oils with phytotoxic activity have sabinene as the major constituents, implying that sabinene might
play an important role as the active compound in the oils. For instance, the essential oil produced
by Ravensara aromatic that was rich in sabinene (the sabinene chemotype) caused 52.5% mortality
of rice seedlings at a dose of 100 µL/L, and completely killed the garden cress seedlings at a dose
of only 5 µl/L [46]. The essential oil of Ferulago angulate also exhibited considerable phytotoxic
activity, with sabinene (6.89%) being one of its major constituents [50]. Zingiber montanum oil reduced
germination and inhibited seedling growth of lettuce significantly, which is abundant with sabinene
13.5–38.0% [51]. Eucalyptol is also known as 1, 8-cineole, which has been previouslyt demonstrated to
be phytotoxic [52–55]; this compound was considered an active constituent of cyanobacterial VOCs that
negatively affect other algae’s growth by reducing photosynthetic abilities and inducing degradation
of photosynthetic pigments [35,56]; Barton et al. [53] found that eucalyptol posed post-emergence
herbicidal activity against annual ryegrass and radish in a dose-dependent manner, and suppression of
seedling growth was significant at and above 0.1 mol/L on radish, meanwhile application of eucapyptol
prohibited seedling growth of ryegrass when the concentration was above 0.1 mol/L, with root
suppression first occurring at 0.0316 mol/L and shoot suppression at 0.1 mol/L. Martino et al. [43]
compared the antigerminative activity of 27 monoterpenes and found that eucalyptol suppressed
radicle elongation of both radish and garden cress in a significant way at the lowest concentration
tested (10−6 M).
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
13 of 19
Phytotoxicity of the essential oils and their major ingredients may lead to the discovery of
environment-friendly natural herbicides. For example, the high effectiveness of eucalyptol and its
analogs led to the successful commerciliazation of a herbicide, cinmethylin, which was designed based
on the chemical structure of eucalyptol, as the active ingredient 1, 4-cineole is a 2-benzyl ether-substituted
analog of eucalyptol [9]. Another herbicide, Burnout II (Bonide Products Inc., New York) used clove
oil (common volatile oil constituent) as the major component in the ingredients [8].
Essential oils have been reported to possess antimicrobial activity, including a number
of Dracocephalum species [15,19,20,57]. Essential oils produced by two Dracocephalum species
(D. polychaetum Bornm. and D. surmandinum Rech.f.) exhibited significant antibacterial activity
against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [17]. Essential oil obtained from another
Dracocephalum species, D. foetidumby, also showed inhibitory activity against most of the tested
pathogenic bacteria and yeast strains with MIC values ranging from 26 to 2592 µg/mL; furthermore,
the oil was found to exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) strains, indicating this oil has potential medical value [20]. Farimani et al. [14] examined
the antimicrobial activity of D. kotschyi essential oils against gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus)
and gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacteria and found S. aureus was the most sensitive strain with
an IC50 value of 2 mg/mL. Zhang et al. [19] tested the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of
D. heterophyllum against nine bacterial strains, one yeast, three fungi, and found that MIC values for
bacteria, yeast, and fungi strains were 0.039–0.156, 0.156, and 0.313–2.500 mg/mL, respectively. Besides
frequently reported antibacterial effect, the essential oil of D. heterophyllum also showed promising
antifungal activity against Colletotrichum species [15].
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils could be attributed to the high content of certain components;
for instance, the high antimicrobial activity of Thymus pulegioides oil was caused by one the its abundant
constituents, thymol [58,59]. Essential oils rich in eucalyptol are reported to possess antimicrobial
activity; eucalyptol was found to exhibit inhibitory activity against various microorganisms such as
E. coli, S. aureus, B. cereus, P. aeruginosa, etc. [60]. Trinh et al. [61] found that eucalyptol significantly
decreased the amount of viable Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida albicans in the vaginal cavity and
myeloperoxidase activity in mouse vaginal tissues compared with controls. Vimal et al. [62] discovered
that eucalyptol and sabinene could be potent inhibitors of salmonella target protein L–asparaginase,
and sabinene was even better than the standard drug, Ciprofloxacin and the natural substrate
L-asparagine. Some essential oils that are rich in sabinene were found to possess antimicrobial activity:
Artemisia kulbadica oil (sabinene 25.1%) showed inhibitory activity against six bacterial strains and one
fungal [63]; Alpinia nutans oil (sabinene 27.8%) was effective against Pasteurella multocida, Escherichia
coli, Salmonella enterica, Shigella fluxneri and Staphylococcus aureus [64]; Laserpitium latifolium oil (sabinene
26.8%) inhibited growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus [65].
The effectiveness of D. integrifolium oil and its major constituents implies their potential value to be
further explored as natural antimicrobial agents.
Essential oils of Dracocephalum plants have been demonstrated to have insecticidal activity.
D. Kotschyi essential oil was effective against green peach aphids, and D. ruyschiana, D. foetidum,
D. moldavica, D. fruticztlosum and D. peregrinum essential oils had good insecticidal effect on mosquito
larvae [24,27]; Chu et al. [25] found D. moldavica essential oil exhibited strong fumigant toxicity against
Sitophilus zeamais and Tribolium castaneum adults with LC50 values of 2.65 and 0.88 mg/L, respectively.
The two major components of the essential oils, sabinene and eucalyptol, also have insecticidal activity.
Sukontason et al. [66] studied the effects of eucalyptol on house fly (Musca domestica) and blow fly
(Chrysomya megacephala) and found for M. domestica, males were more susceptible than females, with the
LD50 being 118 and 177 µg/fly, respectively; as of C. megacephala, the LD50 values were 197 µg/fly for
males and 221 µg/fly for females. Another research showed that eucalyptol possessed strong fumigant
toxicity against two insects, Tribolium castaneum (LC50 = 5.47 mg/L air) and Lasioderma serricorne
(LC50 = 5.18 mg/L air; [67]). Another major constituent, sabinene, was also reported to be insecticidal.
Wang et al. [68] found sabinene was strongly repellent against Tribolium castaneum with the LC50 value
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
14 of 19
of 18.2 mg/L of air, although its effect was weaker compared with the positive control, DEET (N,
N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide). Sabinene also exhibited strong fumigant toxicity against the maize
weevils with LC50 value of 9.12 mg/L [69]. In another study, sabinene possessed noticeable repellent
activity against adults of the granary weevil (Sitophilus granaries) at low dosages [70]. Therefore,
the dominant components of D. integrifolium, eucalyptol and sabinene, are quite likely the main
responsible active ingredients contributing to the oils’ insecticidal activity.
4. Conclusions
Plant derived essential oils have the potential to be further explored as agricultural chemicals to
control pathogenic fungi, pests and weeds to decrease the negative impact of synthetic agents due to the
fact that they are effective, selective, biodegradable, and less toxic to the environment. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first report on the chemical composition, phytotoxic, antimicrobial and pesticidal
activities of the essential oil extracted from D. integrifolium; this is also the first report on the phytotoxic
activity of one of the oil’s major constituents, sabinene. Our results imply that D. integrifolium oil and
its major constituents are valuable candidates to be further explored as biopesticides.
5. Materials and Methods
5.1. Plant Materials
Stems and leaves of D. integrifolium were collected from 3 localities in northern Tianshan Mountain
region located in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China, in June 2018. Specimens were identified
by Prof. Wenjun Li from Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Voucher specimens were deposited with the serial numbers of XJBI018112, XJBI018113, and XJBI018114
at the herbarium of Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Plant materials were collected from 3 different localities in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region,
China, including DI1 (Lat 43◦ 96′ 80′′ N, Lon 87◦ 16′ 48′′ E, alpine pasture, with an elevation of 1683m),
DI2 (Lat 43◦ 96′ 80′′ N, Lon 85◦ 87′ 63′′ E, riverside, with an elevation of 1146 m), and DI3 (Lat 43◦ 86′ 25′′ N,
Lon 86◦ 20′ 53′′ E, valley, with an elevation of 1462 m).
5.2. Essential oil Extraction
Three hundred fresh stems and leaves of D. integrifolium were cut into fragments to extract essential
oil using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The hydrodistillation procedure lasted for 4 h, followed by
collection of the oil; the oil was then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and kept in a sealed vial at
4 ◦ C until required. Materials collected from 3 sites were extracted and stored separately. The following
formula was used to calculate the yield of D. integrifolium oil:
Oil yield (%, V/W) = volume of essential oils (mL)/fresh weight of plant material (g) × 100.
5.3. GC/MS Analysis of the Essential Oils
The phytochemical profile of the oil was analyzed using a 7890A/5975C GC/MS system (Agilent
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with FID and a DB-5MS 5% Phenyl Methyl Silox column
(30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 µm film thickness). The carrier gas was helium (flow rate: 1 mL/min). The oven
temperature was held at 60 ◦ C for 5 min and then programmed from 60 ◦ C to 280 ◦ C at 3 ◦ C/min.
Mass spectra were taken at 70 eV with mass range from m/z 40–800 amu. The temperature of both
injector port and detector port was kept at 280 ◦ C; sample injection volume, 0.1µL; split ratio was 50:
1. Relative amounts of individual compound were calculated based on GC peak areas without FID
response factor correction. Identification of single component was determined by comparison of their
mass spectra and retention indices (RI, calculated by linear interpolation relative to retention times of a
standard mixture of C7–C40 n-alkanes) with the data given in NIST (National Institute of Standards
and Technology), and published literature [52,71].
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
15 of 19
5.4. Phytotoxic Activity of the Essential Oils and Their Major Constituents
The major constituents of the essential oil, i.e., sabinene and eucalyptol, were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, USA). Phytotoxic effect of the essential oils, their major constituents
(sabinene and eucalyptol), along with their mixture prepared at 10.5: 65.1 (sabinene: eucalyptol;
the average ratio of sabinene and eucalyptol in the oils) was evaluated by conducting bioassays against
a dicot plant, Amaranthus retroflexus L., and a monocot plant, Poa annua L. Seeds were surface sterilized
with 0.5% HgCl2 before use. The essential oils, sabinene, eucalyptol, and mixture of sabinene and
eucalyptol were diluted with distilled H2 O to obtain 0.125 (0.109–0.118 mg), 0.25 (0.217–0.236 mg),
0.5 (0.435–0.471 mg), 1 (0.869–0.943 mg), 2 (1.739–1.886 mg), 5 (4.347–4.714 mg) µL/mL solutions,
with acetone (final volume < 0.5%) as the initial solvent; a preliminary experiment demonstrated
that acetone at such concentration did not significantly influence seedling growth of receiver plants.
Five mL of 0.5% acetone in distilled H2 O (control) or diluted solutions (treatments) were added to
each petri dish (9 cm in diameter, lined with a single layer of Whatman No. 2 filter paper), followed
by sowing of 10 seeds of receiver plants. Petri dishes were sealed with parafilm to keep the moisture
and avoid oil evaporation. An incubator was used to store all the petri dishes in the dark at 25 ◦ C.
Seedlings were observed and measured after 5 days of cultivation for the dicot plant A. retroflexus,
and 7 days for the monocot plant P. annua. Five replicates were made for all phytotoxic bioassays
(in total 50 seedlings were measured).
5.5. Antimicrobial Effect of the Essential Oils and Their Major Constituents
5.5.1. Strains
Five microorganisms, including Bacillus subtilis (ATCC6633), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC27853),
Escherichia coli (ATCC25922), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ATCC9763), and Candida albicans (ATCC10231)
were chosen to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of the essential oils as well as their major constituents;
all strains were obtained from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC).
Among the test strains, B. subtilis is a gram positive bacterium; P. aeruginosa and E. coli are gram
negative bacteria; S. cerevisiae and C. albicans are fungi. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oils and
their major constituents were tested using disc diffusion method (for measurement of radius of the
inhibition zone) and tube dilution method (for measurement of MIC) [72,73].
5.5.2. Determination of Radius of Inhibition Zone
Bacteria or fungi suspensions were adjusted to 1 × 10 7 CFU/mL and spread on LB medium (for
bacteria) or PDA medium (for fungi) using sterile glasses spreader. Subsequently, filter paper discs
(5 mm in diameter, Whatman No. 2) that were impregnated with 20 µL (17.388–18.856 mg) of essential
oils or the major constituents were placed on LB or PDA medium. Negative controls were prepared
with distilled water. Petri dishes were then incubated at 37 ◦ C for 24 h for bacteria, and 48 h for fungi.
All assays were performed in triplicates. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the radius
of the inhibition zones to the nearest millimeter.
5.5.3. Determination of MIC
The essential oils and their major constituents were diluted with LB medium (for bacteria)
and PDB medium (for fungi) supplemented with 0.5% of Tween-20 to give oil concentrations of
5 (4.347–4.714 mg), 10 (8.694–9.428 mg), 20 (17.388–18.856 mg), 40 (34.776–37.712 mg) µL/mL. Samples
were first sterilized with a 0.22 µm Millipore before application, and then inoculated with 50 µL of
fresh culture of the test microorganisms at 1 × 107 CFU/mL and incubated at 37 ◦ C for 24 h for bacteria,
and 48 h for fungi. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of oils that had no macroscopically
visible growth. All assays were performed in triplicates.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
16 of 19
5.6. Insecticidal Bioassay
Aphis pomi was used to determine the insecticidal activity of the oils and their major constituents.
Whatman No. 2 filter paper discs (1 cm × 1 cm) were soaked in D. integrifolium oils, sabinene, eucalyptol,
and the mixture of sabinene and eucalyptol at the following concentrations: 0, 0.25 (0.217–0.236 mg),
0.5 (0.435–0.471 mg), 1 (0.869–0.943 mg), 2 (1.739–1.886 mg), 5 (4.347–4.714 mg) and 10 (8.694–9.428 mg)
µL/disc. Paper discs were then placed onto the inner side of the lid of each petri dish (9 cm in diameter)
using adhesive tape. This procedure was adopted in order to prevent direct contact between the oils
and the insects. Treatments consisted of 20 adult aphids, which were placed onto fresh apple tree
leaves that were kept on a layer of moist filter paper. Petri dishes were then covered and transferred
to an incubator and kept at 25 ± 2 ◦ C with a photoperiod L/D = 16:8 for 2 days. Each treatment was
replicated three times (n = 60).
5.7. Statistical Analysis
The significance of the phytotoxic/antimicrobial/pesticidal activity was first examined by ANOVA
(p < 0.05) and then analyzed using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05 level. All of the statistical analyses
were performed using SPSS 13.0 software package.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.Z. and C.W.; methodology, C.Z.; software, C.H.; validation, C.Z.,
and H.S.; formal analysis, S.Z.; investigation, S.Z.; resources, N.K.; data curation, C.W.; writing—original draft
preparation, S.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.S.; visualization, S.Z.; supervision, C.W.; project administration,
H.S.; funding acquisition, H.S. and C.Z.
Funding: This research was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(Grant No. XDA2006030201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770586), and the Taishan
Scholars Program of Shandong, China (Grant No. ts201712071).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Julien, D.; Stefan, T.; Melanie, B.; Jenner, W.H. Efficacy of homemade botanical insecticides based on
traditional knowledge. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 39, 37.
Ahmad, E.; Jaiswal, J.P. Inheritance of resistance to rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) in bread wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.). Electron. J. Plant Breed. 2018, 9, 1083–1093. [CrossRef]
Benhalima, H.; Chaudhry, M.Q.; Mills, K.A.; Price, N.R. Phosphine resistance in stored-product insects
collected from various grain storage facilities in Morocco. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2004, 40, 241–249. [CrossRef]
Pavela, R. Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: A review. Ind. Crop. Prod.
2015, 76, 174–187. [CrossRef]
Akhtar, S.; Sagheer, M.; Javed, N. Antifeedant effect of essential oils of five indigenous medicinal plants
against stored grain insect pests. Pak. J. Zool. 2015, 47, 1045–1050.
Laosinwattana, C.; Wichittrakarn, P.; Teerarak, M. Chemical composition and herbicidal action of essential
oil from tagetes erecta l. leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 126, 129–134. [CrossRef]
Feldlaufer, M.F.; Ulrich, K.R. Essential oils as fumigants for bed bugs (hemiptera: Cimicidae). J. Entomol. Sci.
2015, 50, 129–137. [CrossRef]
Ahuja, N.; Batish, D.R.; Singh, H.P.; Kohli, R.K. Herbicidal activity of eugenol towards some grassy and
broad-leaved weeds. J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 209–218. [CrossRef]
Grayson, B.T.; Williams, K.S.; Freehauf, P.A.; Pease, R.R.; Ziesel, W.T.; Sereno, R.L.; Reinsfelder, R.E.
The physical and chemical properties of the herbicide cinmethylin (SD 95481). J. Pestic. Sci. 1987, 21, 143–153.
[CrossRef]
Uchiyama, N.; Ito, M.; Kiuchi, F.; Honda, G.; Takeda, Y.; Khodzhimatov, O.K.; Ashurmetov, O.A.
A trypanocidal diterpene with novel skeleton from Dracocephalum komarovi. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
531–533. [CrossRef]
Wu, Z.Y.; Li, X.W.; Wang, W.C. Flora of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1983; Volume 65, p. 364.
Mahmood, U.; Kaul, V.K.; Singh, V.; Lal, B.; Negi, H.R.; Ahuja, P.S. Volatile constituents of the cold desert
plant Dracocephalum heterophyllum Benth. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 20, 173–175. [CrossRef]
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
17 of 19
Ehsani, A.; Alizadeh, O.; Hashemi, M.; Afshari, A.; Aminzare, M. Phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial
properties of Melissa officinalis and Dracocephalum moldavica essential oils. Vet. Res. Forum 2017, 8, 223–229.
[PubMed]
Farimani, M.M.; Mirzania, F.; Sonboli, A.; Moghaddam, F.M. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity
of Dracocephalum kotschyi essential oil obtained by microwave extraction and hydrodistillation. Int. J. Food
Prop. 2017, 20, 306–315. [CrossRef]
Stappen, I.; Wanner, J.; Tabanca, N.; Wedge, D.E.; Ali, A.; Kaul, V.K.; Lal, B.; Jaitak, V.; Gochev, V.K.;
Schmidt, E.; et al. Chemical composition and biological activity of essential oils of Dracocephalum heterophyllum
and Hyssopus officinalis from western Himalaya. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 133. [CrossRef]
Pirbalouti, A.G.; Neshat, S.H.; Rahimi, E.; Hamedi, B.; Malekpoor, F. Chemical composition and antibacterial
activity of essential oils of Iranian herbs against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk. Int. J. Food Prop.
2014, 17, 2063–2071. [CrossRef]
Sonboli, A.; Gholipour, A.; Yousefzadi, M. Antibacterial activity of the essential oil and main components of
two Dracocephalum species from Iran. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 2121–2125. [CrossRef]
Nezhadali, A.; Khazaeifar, A.; Akbarpour, M.; Masrournia, M. Chemical composition of essential oil and
antibacterial activity of dracocephalum subcapitatum. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2010, 13, 112–117. [CrossRef]
Zhang, C.J.; Li, H.Y.; Yun, T.; Fu, Y.H.; Liu, C.M.; Gong, B.; Neng, B.J. Chemical composition, antimicrobial
and antioxidant activities of the essential oil of Tibetan herbal medicine Dracocephalum heterophyllum Benth.
Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 1–11. [CrossRef]
Lee, S.B.; Cha, K.H.; Kim, S.N.; Altantsetseg, S.; Shatar, S.; Sarangerel, O.; Nho, C.W. The antimicrobial
activity of essential oil from Dracocephalum foetidum against pathogenic microorganisms. J. Microbiol. 2007,
45, 53–57.
Fallah, S.; Rostaei, M.; Lorigooini, Z.; Surki, A.A. Chemical compositions of essential oil and antioxidant
activity of dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica) in sole crop and dragonhead-soybean (Glycine max)
intercropping system under organic manure and chemical fertilizers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 115, 158–165.
[CrossRef]
Pouraboli, I.; Nazari, S.; Sabet, N.; Sharififar, F.; Jafari, M. Antidiabetic, antioxidant, and antilipid peroxidative
activities of Dracocephalum polychaetum shoot extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: In vivo and
in vitro studies. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 272–278. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Esmaeili, M.A.; Sonboli, A.; Mirjalili, M.H. Oxidative stress protective effect of Dracocephalum multicaule
essential oil against human cancer cell line. Nat. Prod. Lett. 2014, 28, 848–852. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ozek, G.; Tabanca, N.; Radwan, M.M.; Shatar, S.; Altantsetseg, A.; Baatar, D.; Baser, K.H.C.; Becnel, J.J.;
Ozek, T. Preparative capillary GC for characterization of five Dracocephalum essential oils from Mongolia,
and their mosquito larvicidal activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1541–1544. [PubMed]
Chu, S.S.; Liu, S.L.; Liu, Q.Z.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S. Composition and toxicity of Chinese Dracocephalum moldavica
(Labiatae) essential oil against two grain storage insects. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 5262–5267.
Suleimen, E.M.; Ibataev, Z.A.; Iskakova, Z.B.; Dudkin, R.V.; Gorovoi, P.G.; Aistova, E.V. Constituent
composition and biological activity of essential oil from pimpinella thellungiana. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2017, 53,
169–172. [CrossRef]
Jalaei, Z.; Fattahi, M.; Aramideh, S. Allelopathic and insecticidal activities of essential oil of Dracocephalum
kotschyi Boiss. from Iran: A new chemotype with highest limonene-10-al and limonene. Ind. Crop. Prod.
2015, 73, 109–117. [CrossRef]
Sadraei, H.; Asghari, G.; Kasiri, F. Comparison of antispasmodic effects of Dracocephalum kotschyi essential
oil, limonene and α-terpineol. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 109–116. [PubMed]
Golshani, S.; Karamkhani, F.; Monsef-Esfehani, H.R.; Abdollahi, M. Antinociceptive effects of the essential
oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi in the mouse writhing test. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 7, 76–79.
Liu, J.Y.; Wang, L.P.; Liu, Y.M. Volatile components from Dracocephalum integrifolium Bge. Fine Chem. 2012, 29,
447–452.
Yaghmai, M.S.; Taffazoli, R. The essential oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 3, 33–36.
[CrossRef]
Kakasy, A.Z.; Lemberkovics, E.; Simándi, B.; Lelik, L.; Hethelyi, E.; Antal, I.; Szoke, E. Comparative study of
traditional essential oil and supercritical fluid extracts of Moldavian dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica
L.). Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 21, 598–603. [CrossRef]
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
18 of 19
Raut, J.S.; Karuppayil, S.M.; Raut, J.S.; Karuppayil, S.M. A status review on the medicinal properties of
essential oils. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 62, 250–264. [CrossRef]
Kaur, S.; Singh, H.P.; Mittal, S.; Batish, D.R.; Kohli, R.K. Phytotoxic effects of volatile oil from Artemisia
scoparia against weeds and its possible use as a bioherbicide. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32, 54–61. [CrossRef]
Wei, C.X.; Zhou, S.X.; Li, W.J.; Jiang, C.Y.; Yang, W.; Han, C.X.; Zhang, C.; Shao, H. Chemical composition
and allelopathic, phytotoxic and pesticidal activities of Atriplex cana LEDEB. (Amaranthaceae) essential oil.
Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1800595. [CrossRef]
Shao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Nan, P.; Huang, X.; Zhang, C. Chemical composition and phytotoxic activity of the
volatile oil of invasive Xanthium italicum Moretti from China. J. Arid Land 2013, 5, 324–330. [CrossRef]
Shao, H.; Zeng, R.S.; Wang, R.L.; Zhang, B.C.; Zhang, C. Selective phytotoxicity of xanthinin and xanthatin
from invasive weed Xanthium italicum Morretti on test plants. Allelopath. J. 2015, 35, 77–86.
Rice, E.L. Allelopathy, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984; p. 422.
Kourtev, P.S.; Ehrenfeld, J.G.; Häggblom, M. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure
and function in the soil. Ecology 2002, 83, 3152–3166. [CrossRef]
Barney, J.N.; Sparks, J.P.; Greenberg, J.; Whitlow, T.H.; Guenther, A. Biogenic volatile organic compounds
from an invasive species: Impacts on plant-plant interactions. Plant. Ecol. 2009, 203, 195–205. [CrossRef]
Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem.
Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [CrossRef]
Tang, J.S.; Jiang, C.Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Shao, H.; Zhang, C. Allelopathic potential of volatile organic
compounds released by Xanthium sibiricum Patrin ex Widder. Allelopath. J. 2019, 47, 233–242. [CrossRef]
Martino, L.D.; Mancini, E.; Almeida, L.F.R.; Feo, V.D. The antigerminative activity of twenty-seven
monoterpenes. Molecules 2010, 15, 6630–6637. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mamadalieva, N.Z.; Youssef, F.S.; Ashour, M.L.; Sasmakov, S.A.; Tiezzi, A.; Azimova, S.S. Chemical
composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oils of three Uzbek Lamiaceae species.
Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 33, 2394–2397. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Alimpic, A.; Pljevljakusic, D.; Savikin, K.; Knezevic, A.; Curcic, M.; Velickovic, D.; Stevic, T.; Petrovic, G.;
Matevski, V.; Vukojevic, J.; et al. Composition and biological effects of Salvia ringens (Lamiaceae) essential oil
and extracts. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 76, 702–709. [CrossRef]
Andrianjafinandrasana, S.N.; Andrianoelisoa, H.S.; Jeanson, M.L.; Ramonta, I.R.; Danthu, P. Allelopathic
effects of volatile compounds of essential oil from Ravensara aromatica Sonnerat chemotypes. Allelopath. J.
2013, 31, 333–344.
Polatoğlu, K.; Karakoç, Ö.C.; Gören, N. Phytotoxic, DPPH scavenging, insecticidal activities and essential oil
composition of Achillea vermicularis, A. teretifoliaand proposed chemotypes of A. biebersteinii (Asteraceae).
Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 51, 35–45. [CrossRef]
Ben, G.A.; Hanana, M.; Amri, I.; Balti, H.; Gargouri, S.; Jamoussi, B.; Hamrouni, L. Chemical composition of
Eucalyptus erythrocorys essential oils and evaluation of their herbicidal and antifungal activities. J. Pest. Sci.
2013, 86, 571–577.
Savikin-Fodulovic, K.P.; Tasic, S.R.; Menkovic, N.R. The Essential Oil of Salvia brachyodon Vandas. Lamiaceae.
J. Essent. Oil Res. 2002, 14, 342–343. [CrossRef]
Razavi, S.M.; Ravansalar, A.; Mirinejad, S. The investigation on phytochemicals from ferulago angulata
(schlecht) boiss, indigenous to central parts of iran. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 2037–2040. [CrossRef]
Verma, R.S.; Joshi, N.; Padalia, R.C.; Singh, V.R.; Goswami, P.; Kumar, A. Chemical composition and
allelopathic, antibacterial, antifungal and antiacetylcholinesterase activity of fish-mint (Houttuynia cordata
Thunb.) from India. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700189. [CrossRef]
Shao, H.; Hu, Y.X.; Han, C.X.; Wei, C.X.; Zhou, S.X.; Zhang, C.P.; Zhang, C. Chemical composition and
phytotoxic activity of Seriphidium terrae-albae (Asteraceae) essential oil. Chem. Biodivers. 2018, 15, e1800348.
[CrossRef]
Barton, A.F.M.; Clarke, B.R.; Dell, B.; Knight, A.R. Post-emergent herbicidal activity of cineole derivatives.
J. Pest Sci. 2014, 87, 531–541. [CrossRef]
Barton, A.F.M.; Dell, B.; Knight, A.R. Herbicidal activity of cineole derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58,
10147–10155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qiu, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, Y.; Fang, B.Z.; Cai, C.X.; Liu, S.P. Identification and allelopathic effects of 1, 8-cineole
from Eucalyptus urophylla on lettuce. Allelopath. J. 2010, 26, 255–264.
Toxins 2019, 11, 598
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
19 of 19
Zhao, J.; Yang, L.; Zhou, L.; Bai, Y.; Wang, B.; Hou, P.; Xu, Q.H.; Yang, W.T.; Zuo, Z.J. Inhibitory effects of
eucalyptol and limonene on the photosynthetic abilities in chlorella vulgaris (chlorophyceae). Phycologia
2016, 55, 696–702. [CrossRef]
Nazemisalman, B.; Vahabi, S.; Yazdinejad, A.; Haghghi, F.; Jam, M.S.; Heydari, F. Comparison of antimicrobial
effect of Ziziphora tenuior, Dracocephalum moldavica, Ferula gummosa, and Prangos ferulacea essential oil with
chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. Dent. Res. J. 2018, 15, 111–116.
Taha, A.S.M.; Eldahshan, O.A. Chemical characteristics, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of the essential
oil of Egyptian Cinnamomum glanduliferum Bark. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600443. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Martino, L.D.; Bruno, M.; Formisano, C.; De Feo, V.; Napolitano, F.; Rosselli, S.; Senatore, F. Chemical
composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils from two species of Thymus growing wild in
southern Italy. Molecules 2009, 14, 4614–4624. [CrossRef]
Mahboubi, M.; Kazempour, N. The antimicrobial activity of essential oil from Perovskia abrotanoides Karel and
its main components. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 71, 343–347. [CrossRef]
Trinh, H.T.; Lee, I.A.; Hyun, Y.J.; Kim, D.H. Artemisia princeps Pamp. essential oil and its constituents
eucalyptol and α-terpineol ameliorate bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis in mice by inhibiting
bacterial growth and NF-kappa B activation. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 1996–2002. [CrossRef]
Vimal, A.; Pal, D.; Tripathi, T.; Kumar, A. Eucalyptol, sabinene and cinnamaldehyde: Potent inhibitors of
salmonella target protein L–asparaginase. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 258. [CrossRef]
Aghajani, Z.; Kazemi, M.; Dakhili, M.; Rustaiyan, A. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential
oil of Artemisia kulbadica from iran. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1261–1266. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Joshi, S.; Prakash, O.; Pant, A.K.; Mathela, C.S. Chemical composition, and antioxidant and antimicrobial
activities of Alpinia nutans rosc. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 85–90. [CrossRef]
Popović, V.B.; Petrović, S.D.; Milenković, M.T.; Drobac, M.M.; Couladis, M.A.; Niketić, M.S. Composition and
antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of Laserpitium latifolium l. and L. ochridanum micevski (apiaceae).
Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 170–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sukontason, K.L.; Boonchu, N.; Sukontason, K.; Choochote, W. Effects of eucalyptol on house fly (diptera:
Muscidae) and blow fly (diptera: Calliphoridae). Rev. Do Inst. De Med. Trop. De São Paulo 2004, 46, 97–101.
[CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; You, C.X.; Wang, C.F.; Yang, K.; Deng, Z.W. Chemical constituents and insecticidal activities of
the essential oil from amomum tsaoko against two stored-product insects. J. Oleo Sci. 2014, 63, 1019–1026.
[CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; You, C.X.; Yang, K.; Wu, Y.; Chen, R.; Zhang, W.J.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Deng, Z.W.; Geng, Z.F.;
et al. Bioactivity of essential eil of Zingiber purpureum rhizomes and its main compounds against two stored
product insects. Biol. Microb. Control 2015, 108, 925–932.
Wang, C.F.; Yang, K.; Zhang, H.M.; Cao, J.; Fang, R.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Wang, Y.Y.; Deng, Z.W.; Zhou, L.G.
Components and insecticidal activity against the maize weevils of zanthoxylum schinifolium fruits and leaves.
Molecules 2011, 16, 3077–3088. [CrossRef]
Benelli, G.; Flamini, G.; Canale, A.; Molfetta, I.; Cioni, P.L.; Conti, B. Repellence of Hyptis suaveolens l.
(lamiaceae) whole essential oil and major constituents against adults of the granary weevil sitophilus granarius
(l.) (coleoptera: Dryophthoridae). Bull. Insectol. 1967, 31, 177–183.
Oladipupo, L.; Adebola, O. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Cyperus rotundus L. from South
Africa. Molecules 2009, 14, 2909–2917. [CrossRef]
Singh, S.; Sankar, B.; Rajesh, S.; Sahoo, K.; Subudhi, E.; Nayak, S. Chemical composition of Turmeric oil
(Curcuma longa L. cv. Roma) and its antimicrobial activity against eye infecting pathogens. J. Essent. Oil Res.
2011, 23, 11–18. [CrossRef]
Pattnaik, S.; Subramanyam, V.R.; Bapuji, M.; Kole, C.R. Antibacterial activity of aromatic constituents of
essential oils. Microbios 1997, 89, 39–47. [PubMed]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).