The Journal of Phytopharmacology 2015; 4(1): 9-16
Online at: www.phytopharmajournal.com
Research Article
ISSN 2230-480X
JPHYTO 2015; 4(1): 9-16
January- February
© 2015, All rights reserved
Antimicrobial, antioxidant and wound healing
properties of Leucas lanata Wall. ex Benth
Veena Dixit*, Pritt Verma, Priyanka Agnihotri, Ajai Kumar Paliwal, Chandana Venkateswara Rao,
Tariq Husain
Abstract
Veena Dixit
1. Plant Diversity, Systematics and
Herbarium
Division,
CSIRNational
Botanical
Research
Institute, Lucknow- 226001, Uttar
Pradesh, India
2. Department of Botany, Govt.
P.G. College, Rudrapur-263153,
Uttarakhand, India
Pritt Verma
Pharmacognosy
and
Ethnopharmacology
Division,
CSIR-National Botanical Research
Institute, Lucknow- 226001, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Priyanka Agnihotri
Plant Diversity, Systematics and
Herbarium
Division,
CSIRNational
Botanical
Research
Institute, Lucknow- 226001, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Ajai Kumar Paliwal
Department of Botany, Govt. P.G.
College,
Rudrapur-263153,
Uttarakhand, India
Chandana Venkateswara Rao
Pharmacognosy
and
Ethnopharmacology
Division,
CSIR-National Botanical Research
Institute, Lucknow- 226001, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Tariq Husain
Plant Diversity, Systematics and
Herbarium
Division,
CSIRNational
Botanical
Research
Institute, Lucknow- 226001, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Correspondence:
Veena Dixit
Plant Diversity, Systematics and
Herbarium
Division,
CSIRNational
Botanical
Research
Institute, Lucknow- 226001, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Leucas lanata Wall. ex Benth. (Lamiaceae) is an important plant commonly known as Biskapra or Gumma and
used to treat many ailments by traditional healers and local peoples. This study was designed to evaluate
wound healing potential of Leucas lanata through the excision wound model and functional changes in
biochemical indicators of antioxidant parameters. This study also investigated the antimicrobial as well as
antioxidant activity of L. lanata. The 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata was found to contain 0.74% of phenolic
and 0.21% of flavonoid content. The IC5O value was 122.56 μg/ml and reducing power increased with the
increasing concentrations. The antimicrobial activity of the extract was more effective against bacterial strains
compared to fungal strains. Remarkable wound healing activity was observed with the 10% (w/w) ointment of
L. lanata 50% EtOH extract. In the study of uninfected wounds, epithelization period was reduced from
24.66±0.97 for the control group treated with blank ointment to 12.16±0.36 for the group treated with 10%
LLEE ointment. Similarly, in case of infected wounds with Staphylococcus epidermidis, the percentage of
wound contraction was significantly enhanced. Both doses of extract significantly increased superoxide
dismutase, catalase, reduced glutathione when compared with the control group of infected and uninfected
wound. HPLC analysis showed the presence of gallic, protocatechuic, chlorogenic, caffeic and ferulic acids.
These compounds have important biological activities and responsible for antimicrobial and wound healing
activity. The study provided sufficient evidences that, L. lanata might be indeed potential sources to treat many
diseases.
Keywords: Leucas lanata, Soxhlet extraction, Antimicrobial, Wound healing, Antioxidant.
Introduction
Medicinal Plant has long been a very important source of drug and many have been screened if they
contain compounds with therapeutic activity.1 Many of these isolations were based on the uses of the
medicinal plant by traditional healers.2 The medicinal value of these plants lies in their secondary
metabolites, which create a specific physiological action on the human body. The most important
bioactive constituents of plants are alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. 3 Plant-based
antioxidants are now preferred to the synthetic ones because of safety concerns. 4 These factors have
stimulated the widespread screening of plants for possible medicinal, antimicrobial and antioxidant
properties.5
Wounds are simply physical injuries that results loss of cellular and functional continuity of living tissue.
It can be caused by physical, chemical, microbial, immunological insults typically associated with the
loss function.6 Wound healing is an interaction of a complex cascade of cellular and biochemical actions,
healing to the restoration of structural and functional integrity with regaining the strength of injured
tissues. Therefore, the aim of treating a wound is either to shorten the time required for healing or to
accelerate the wound healing process. Although the process of wound healing is natural, an infection can
delay healing.7 Medicinal plants have been used for the treatment of various dermatological ailments,
especially cuts, wounds and burns.8, 9 Some of them owe their direct effect on the wound healing process
and some to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. Antimicrobial therapy of
wound care mainly controls further microbial contamination, colonization and consequent proliferation
which promoting the healing of wounds.10
Leucas lanata Wall. ex Benth. (Lamiaceae) is vernacularly known as Biskapra or Gumma grows
generally on dry slopes among the grasses in the Himalayas and the hills of South India at an altitude
range of 700 m – 3,000 m. Ethnomedicinally, the juice of the whole plant has been traditionally used by
local peoples to treat stomach-ache11, headache12, whooping cough13 and as an antidote for reptile
poison14. Leaves and flowers with cold water or milk are also used in cold, cough and dysentery.15 Fresh
leaves are placed on the affected area for absorbing pus16 and applied externally for wound healing in the
9
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
form of paste17. This plant also reported to have antibacterial18, free
radical scavenging and antiepileptic19 and antiparkinson activities20.
% RSA = [Absorbance of DPPH - Absorbance of test Sample]
X 100
Absorbance of DPPH
However, the medicinal values of this plant pertaining to
antimicrobial, antioxidant and wound healing activities have not yet
been reported. This study was designed to explore the healing effects
of topically applied 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata in Sprague Dawley
rats and functional changes in biochemical indicators in antioxidant
parameters.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and microorganisms
Sodium acetate, potassium chloride, 2-diphenyl-1- picrylhydrazylhydrate (DPPH), Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, catechol, beta carotene,
Quercetin, Gallic acid, Tween-20, sodium carbonate, sodium
hydroxide, acetone, butanol, chloroform, ethanol and aluminium
chloride were obtained from Merck India, Mumbai. For HPLC
method Gallic, Protocatechuic, caffeic, ferulic acids and electronicgrade methanol and acetonitrile were procured from Sigma-Aldrich
company. Whatman No.1 filter paper and disc were used for filtration
of the samples and antimicrobial assay respectively. Microorganisms
such as Salmonella enterica ser. typhi (MTCC-733), Salmonella
enterica subsp. enterica ser. typhimurium (MTCC-3224),
Staphylococcus epidermidis (MTCC-3382), Aspergillus fumigatus
(MTCC-10561), Candida krusei (MTCC-9215) were obtained from
the Microbial Type Culture Collection & Gene Bank (MTCC),
Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh. Various Media for
analysis were purchased from Hi-media laboratories Pvt. Ltd.,
Mumbai. All the chemicals used for analysis were of analytical grade.
Collection and authentication of plant
The whole plant of the L. lanata was collected from the local areas of
Pachmarhi, Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh, India in the month of
September, 2014. For future reference, voucher specimens (Collection
No.:260612) were deposited in the LWG herbarium, CSIR-NBRI,
Lucknow.
Extraction and phytochemical screening
The material was dried and pulverized to a coarse powder. The
powdered material was passed through a 40 mesh sieve and extracted
with of 50% (v/v) EtOH at 380C on a water bath using Soxhlet
extractor for 24 h. The extract was filtered and concentrated under
reduced pressure in a rotavapour (Buchi R-200 USA) below 400C.
The resulting crude extract was then stored at 40C until further
analysis of wound healing and antimicrobial activity. Phytochemical
studies were carried out on the 50% EtOH extract of L. Lanata21, 22
and it revealed the presence of tannins, phenolics, saponins,
flavanoids, terpenoids and carbohydrates. The percentage yield of the
extract was found to be 10.5% w/w.
A stock solution of 1mg/ml plant extract (using extract solvent) was
prepared. 0.5ml stock solution was estimated for total flavonoid and
phenolic content according to the Woisky and Salatino23 and Folin–
Ciocalteu method24 respectively.
2, 2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH˚) radical scavenging assay
The capacity to scavenge the stable free radical DPPH was evaluated
according to the method of Blois25 with some modifications. Briefly,
various concentrations (200-50µg/mL) of extract were prepared using
50% EtOH and mixed with equal volume of 50% EtOH solution
containing DPPH radicals (0.135mM). The mixture was shaken
vigorously and left to react in the dark for 30 minutes at room
temperature (until stable absorption values were obtained). The
reduction of the DPPH radical was determined the absorption at 517
nm. The radical-scavenging activity (RSA) was calculated as a
percentage of DPPH discoloration using the equation:
The extract concentration providing 50% inhibition (IC50) was
calculated from the graph of RSA percentage against extract
concentration. Ascorbic acid was used as standard.
Reducing power assay
The reducing power of the sample was determined by the method of
Oyaizu26 with some modifications. An aliquot of the sample (1.0 mL)
at various concentrations (50-200 µg/mL) was mixed with phosphate
buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6, 2.5 mL) and 1% potassium ferricyanide (2.5
mL). The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. After 2.5 ml of
10% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) were added, the mixture was
centrifuged at 650 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was
mixed with distilled water (2.5 mL) and 0.1% iron (III) chloride (0.5
mL), and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm using an
appropriate blank; higher absorbance indicates higher reducing power.
Measurements were done in triplicates.
Antimicrobial Assay
Agar disc diffusion method was performed to evaluate the
antimicrobial activity of plant extract.27 Briefly, all concentrations of
50% EtOH extract were prepared using dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO).
For the inoculums (108 cfu/mL), test bacteria and fungi were grown in
sterile Muller–Hinton broth and Sabouraud dextrose broth tubes
respectively overnight. The inoculums of bacteria and fungi were
aseptically plated using sterile cotton swabs, into petri dishes with
Muller–Hinton agar and Sabouraud dextrose agar respectively. The
filter paper disc was impregnated with the different concentration to
obtain 200, 150, 100, 50 µg/disc samples and placed on the prepared
agar surface. The petri dishes were pre-incubated at room
temperature, allowing the complete diffusion of the samples and
incubated at 37oC for 24 hours (for bacteria) and 48 hours (for fungi).
Tetracycline and nystatin were used as standard antibacterial and
antifungal antibiotics respectively. The experiments were performed
in triplicate. After incubation the inhibitory potential of the extract
was quantified by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition in
mm. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using the parameters
according to Quinto & Santos28: inhibition zone <10 mm, inactive;
10-13 mm, partially active; 14-19 mm, active; >19 mm, very active.
Excision wound model
Experimental animals
Sprague Dawley rats (120-180 g) of either sex were taken from the
animal house of the National Laboratory Animal Centre, Lucknow,
India. All experiments were performed according to the current
guidelines for the care of laboratory animals and the ethical guidelines
for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals29
approved by the Institutional Committee for Ethical use of Animals
and Review Board (CPCSEA/IAEC/7-18). Two types of formulations
with different concentrations 5 and 10% (w/w) of 50% EtOH of L.
lanata extract was prepared in simple ointment base (USP) by the
tituration method in a ceramic mortar and pestle.30 Standard (betadine
ointment) was compared with the formulations to check the wound
healing potential.
Wound without Infection
The animals were divided into four groups of six animals each and
anaesthetized with slight vapour inhalation of anaesthetic ether in
anaesthesia chamber. The dorsal surface of animals was shaved and
full skin thickness was excised from the sterile dorsal marked area to
get a wound measuring about 8 mm diameter. The animals were
placed singly in individual cages. The wound was left undressed to the
open environment. Wounds were left open and the ointment was
applied topically twice a day (once in the morning and evening) onto
10
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
each rat till the wound was completely healed.31 Then the treatment
was started in the following manner to the different groups:
chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid) was performed by HPLCUV.36
Group I: Test group with 5% w/w ointment of LLEE
Statistical analysis
Group II: Test group with 10% w/w ointment of LLEE
Group IV: No treatment and served as controlled.
The statistical significance of the results were analyzed by one way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Student–Newman–Keul's
procedure. Experimental results concerning this study were mean ±
(standard error mean) SEM of six parallel observations and p<0.05,
p<0.01 and p<0.001 was considered as significant.
Wound with Infection
Results
The methodology used for wound formation and treatment was the
same as in without the infection model. The wound of each animal
was inoculated with an overnight (18 h old) S. epidermidis culture and
it were left for 24 h to set the infection in and then the treatment was
started, till the wound was completely healed.
After estimations of the 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata was found to
contain 0.735±0.017% of total phenolic (Figure 1) and 0.21±0.020%
of total flavonoid content (Figure 2). The IC50 is used for the
interpretation of the results from the DPPH method and is defined as
the concentration of substrate that causes 50% loss of the DPPH
activity (color). The IC5O value for 50% hydro alcohol extract was
122.56 μg/ml. The IC50 value for Ascorbic acid was shown to be
42.23 µg /ml. The reducing power of 50% EtOH extract at various
concentrations, increased with the increasing concentrations.
Parameters evaluated for excision wound healing
Measurement of wound contraction: The wound area was measured
with a translucent paper and traced on every 3rd day. Wound
contraction was expressed as percentage of the reduction in wound
size.32
Percentage of wound contraction = [(Initial wound area – Specific day
wound area) / Initial wound area] x 100
Epithelialization period: Number of days required for falling of the
eschar without any residual raw wound gave the period of
epithelization. It was measured in days from wounding day (day zero)
till the full epithelialization.
120
L. lanata extract
80
60
40
20
0
Antioxidant parameters
0
The assay of SOD is based on the inhibition of the formation of
NADH-phenazine methosulphate-nitro blue tetrazolium formazan.
The activity of SOD was calculated in terms of units defined as the
amount of SOD that inhibits nitro blue tetrazolium reduction by
50%.33
50
100
150
Concentration (µg/mL)
200
Figure 1: DPPH radical scavenging activity of 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata
3.5
Ascorbic acid
Absorbance at 700nm
After day 12 post wounding, Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Catalase
(CAT) and reduced Glutathione (GSH) were estimated in wound
tissue homogenate. Briefly, wound tissue were excised by using the
same punch (8 mm diameter), which excised wounded area without
contaminating it with normal skin. The tissue was collected in
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7) and sample preparation was
done according to Shukla et al.33
Ascorbic acid
100
% Inhibition
Group III: Test group with standard drug ointment (Betadin)
L.lanata extract
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
CAT measurement was done based on the ability of catalase to
oxidize hydrogen peroxide. One unit (U) of catalase is the enzyme,
which decomposes one mM of H2O2/min at 25°C.34
50
100
150
Concentration (μg/mL)
200
Figure 2: Reducing power of 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata
Antimicrobial assay
GSH activity in the homogenate was estimated using a fluorometric
method in which GSH with ortho-phthalialdehyde (OPT) yields a
highly fluorescent product at alkaline pH.35
HPLC studies
1mg/ml stock solution of 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata was prepared
in 50% (v/v) methanol. Qualitative and quantitave analysis of sample
extract and standard polyphenoles (Gallic acid, protocatechuic acid,
The result data pertaining to the antimicrobial potential of 50% EtOH
extract of L. lanata were presented in table 01. A maximum zone of
inhibition (20.91±0.69 mm) exhibited by 50% EtOH extract of L.
lanata against Gram positive bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis at
200μg/disc concentration, followed by Gram negative bacteria
Salmonella typhi (20.56±0.37) and Salmonella typhimurium
(19.76±0.37). In case of fungal strains, the highest concentration of
the extract showed maximum activity against Candida krusei
(17.82±0.72) in comparison of Aspergillus fumigatus (16.52±0.97) at
200μg/disc concentration. While lowest concentration (50μg/disc)
showed inactive or partially active antimicrobial activity against all
tested bacteria and fungi.
11
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
Table 1: Antimicrobial activity of L. lanata against different pathogens compared to standard antibiotics
Inhibition Zone (mm)
Concentration
Staphylococcus
epidermidis
Salmonella
typhimurium
Salmonella typhi
Candida krusei
Aspergillus
fumigatus
LLEE
11.61±0.43a
9.15±0.81
10.31±0.27a
7.85±0.56
0.0± 0.0
50 μg/disc
LLEE
13.46±0.64a
13.35±0.48b
12.26±0.35b
10.43±0.81a
9.17±0.82
100 μg/disc
LLEE
17.37±0.82c
16.81±0.51b
15.34±0.51b
14.52±0.64c
14.15±0.45a
150 μg/disc
LLEE
20.91±0.69b
20.56±0.37c
19.76±0.37c
17.82±0.72c
16.52±0.97b
200 μg/disc
0.0± 0.0
0.0± 0.0
Tetracycline
30.16±0.11
22.56±0.09
21.06±0.13
20 μg/disc
0.0± 0.0
0.0± 0.0
0.0± 0.0
Nystatin
24.2±0.08
25.2±0.14
20 μg/disc
Values are expressed as mean ±SEM; n=3, One Way ANOVA followed by Student-Newmen-Keuls t-test; t-value denoted significance at a: P<0.05; b: P<0.01; c:
P<0.001 respectively
Wound contraction studies
In the study of the excision wound model without infection, the rate of
wound healing was higher. 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata showed
significant dose dependent (5% and 10% w/w ointment, topically)
wound healing potency. The studies revealed that, when compared to
control (4.57±0.13) on day 15, 5% LLEE ointment (0.99±0.32)
showed significant improvement (p<0.001), while 10% LLEE
ointment and standard showed wounds full contraction (Table 2). It
was observed that there is complete healing of the wounded area in
different group of animals were clearly visualized in 12 to 15 days of
the experimental period.
In the case of infected wounds, reduction of wound area of different
treatment groups on the 18th day for the excision wound model was
recorded. The studies revealed that, when compared to control
(4.33±0.31) on day 15, 5% LLEE ointment (1.02±0.13), 10% LLEE
ointment (0.23 ± 0.36) and standard (0.09 ± 0.36) showed significant
improvement (p<0.05 to p<0.001) in wound contraction (Table 3). It
was observed that there is complete healing of wound in the group of
10% (w/w) LLEE ointment and standard (Betadin) on the 15 to
18days. The study reveals that all the four groups of both infected and
uninfected wound model showed decreased wound area from day to
day (Figure 3).
Table 2: The effect of L. lanata ointment on the uninfescted excised wound in rats
Treatment
Wound contraction (mm2) (percentage wound closure in parenthesis)
Epithelization
group
period (Days)
0 Day
3rd Day
6th Day
9th Day
12th Day
15th Day
18th Day
LLEE
8.74±0.37a
7.14±0.30b
5.68±0.38
4.03±0.27c
2.59±0.24b
0.99±0.32c
0.00 (100)
16.08± 0.77
ointment (5% (0.00)
(18.31)
(35.01)
(53.89)
(72.65)
(88.67)
w/w)
LLEE
8.53±0.40b
6.29±0.23b
4.54±0.28c
2.37±0.33c
0.39±0.32c
0.00
0.00 (100)
12.16±0.36
ointment
(0.00)
(26.26)
(46.78)
(72.23)
(95.43)
(100)
(10% w/w)
Betadin
8.67±0.37c
5.98±0.30b
4.37±0.34c
1.94±0.40c
0.17±0.27c
0.00
0.00 (100)
12.98±0.64
(31.03)
(49.60)
(98.04)
ointment
(0.00)
(77.62)
(100)
(10% w/w)
Blank
8.41±0.30
7.37±0.21
6.96±0.34
5.94±0.23
5.31±0.11
4.57±0.13
3.13±0.19
24.66±0.97
ointment
(0.00)
(12.37)
(17.24)
(29.37)
(36.86)
(45.67)
(62.78)
Values are expressed as mean ±SEM; n=6, One Way ANOVA followed by Student-Newmen-Keuls t-test; t-value denoted significance at a: P<0.05; b: P<0.01; c:
P<0.001 respectively.
Table 3: The effect of L. lanata ointment on the infected excised wound in rats
Treatment
Wound contraction (mm2) (percentage wound contraction in parenthesis)
Epithelization
group
period (Days)
0 Day
3rd Day
6th Day
9th Day
12th Day
15th Day
18th Day
LLEE
8.26±0.23a
6.91±0.36c
5.89±0.13b
4.11±0.30b
2.74±0.17a
1.02±0.13c
0.35±0.23c
19.06±0.56
(28.69)
(66.83)
(87.65)
ointment (5% (0.00)
(16.34)
(50.24)
(95.73)
w/w)
LLEE
8.14±0.24a
6.00±0.37b
4.79±0.31c
2.89±0.28c
1.35±0.20c
0.23±0.36c
0.00 (100)
15.83±0.30
(83.42)
ointment
(0.00)
(26.29)
(41.16)
(64.50)
(97.17)
(10% w/w)
Betadin
8.39±0.18b
5.82±0.35c
4.81±0.27c
2.37±0.31c
1.17±0.32c
0.09±0.36c
0.00 (100)
15.09±0.38
(30.63)
(71.75)
(98.93)
ointment
(0.00)
(42.66)
(86.05)
(10% w/w)
Blank
8.32±0.39
7.41±0.36
6.99±0.31
6.03±0.24
5.67±0.33
4.33±0.31
3.15±0.22
25.26±0.77
ointment
(0.00)
(10.94)
(15.99)
(27.52)
(31.85)
(47.95)
(62.14)
Values are expressed as mean ±SEM; n=6, One Way ANOVA followed by Student-Newmen-Keuls t-test; t-value denoted significance at a: p<0.05; b: p<0.01; c:
p<0.001respectively.
12
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
Figure 3: Sprague dawley rats dorsal wound area photographed at 0, 6th and 15th day by Excision wound model (Uninfected): (A-C) Group I- treated with 5%
w/w ointment of LLEE ; (D-F) Group II-treated with 10% w/w ointment of LLEE; (G-I) Group III- treated with standard drug (10% w/w Betadin) (J-L) Group-IV
– Not treated
Epithelialization period
Control
SOD Activity (units/mg protein)
The epithelialization was observed from the first day. The data in the
observation tables reveals that extent of percentage closure by
epithelialization in case of uninfected wound is higher than excised
infected wound. It was observed that in case of uninfected excision
wound, epithelization period was reduced in a dose related manner
from 24.66±0.97 for the blank ointment control to 12.16±0.36 for the
treated group with 10% (w/w) LLEE ointment (Table 2). Similarly, in
case of infected excised wound model epithelization period was
equally reduced in a dose related manner from 25.26±0.77 for the
blank ointment control to 15.09±0.38 for the standard treated group
(Table 3).
2.4
5%
10%
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
Antioxidant Parameters
0
SOD activity in wound tissue was significantly increased in the case
of rats treated with LLEE 10% w/w ointment (p<0.01) and LLEE 5%
w/w ointment (p<0.01) in the excision uninfected wound model.
Similarly, the activity was also significantly increased in treated rats
with LLEE 10% w/w ointment (p<0.001) and LLEE 5% w/w
ointment (p<0.001) in uninfected excision wound models, when
compared with control wounds (Figure 4).
Catalase activity found to be elevated significantly in experimental
rats treated with LLEE 10% w/w ointment (p<0.01) and LLEE 5%
w/w ointment (p<0.05) in the excision uninfected wound model.
While in the case of infected excision wounds significant increase in
different treated groups (p<0.01) was observed over blank ointment
treated group (Figure 5).
Uninfected
Infected
Figure 4: Effect of topical 5% and 10% ointment of L. lanata on SOD
activity. Values are mean ±SEM (n=6).
Reduced glutathione, which is an important free radical scavenger
showed a trend towards significant increase in treated rats with LLEE
10% w/w ointment (p<0.05) and LLEE 5% w/w ointment (p<0.01) of
the uninfected wound model. Similarly, application of LLEE 10%
w/w ointment and LLEE 5% w/w ointment resulted significant
elevation in the level of GSH, p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively, when
compared to blank ointment treated rats (Figure 6).
13
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
16
Control
5%
10%
CAT Activity (Units/mg protein)
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Uninfected
Infected
Figure 5: Effect of topical 5% and 10% ointment of L. lanata on CAT activity.
Values are mean ±SEM (n=6).
Discussion
3
Control
5%
10%
2.5
GSH (μg/mg protein)
Figure 7: HPLC chromatograms obtained from Standarad (A) and L. lanata
(B) extract at 254 nm: 1, gallic acid; 2. protocatechuic acid; 3. chlorogenic
acid; 4. caffeic acid; 5. rutin,; 6. ferulic acid; 7. quercetin; 8. kaempferol.
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Uninfected
Infected
Figure 6: Effect of topical 5% and 10% ointment of L. lanata on GSH level.
Values are mean ±SEM (n=6)
HPLC studies
From the HPLC study chromatogram (Figure 7) of distinct peaks for
all five polyphenols of following compounds have been identified in
the total cell-free 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata. The amount of
compounds present in extract of L. lanata were: gallic acid (0.683%),
protocatechuic acid (0.291%), Chlorogenic acid (0.856%), caffeic
acid (0.198%), ferulic acid (0.317%) and Quercetin (0.045%).
The present study was carried out to evaluate antioxidant,
antimicrobial activity and wound healing effects of 50% EtOH extract
of L. lanata. Phytochemical compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids,
tannins, phenolics, saponins, terpenoids and other aromatic
compounds are secondary metabolites that are produced in plants as a
response to stress or as a part of their defence mechanism against
prediction by many microorganisms, insects and other herbivores.37
Plants phenols and flavonoids are important groups of natural
antioxidants and having greater antimicrobial activity. The principle
of the DPPH method based on the production of free radical38 and the
effect of antioxidants on DPPH radical scavenging is due to their
hydrogen donating ability. The results indicating that, total phenolic
and flavonoid content in the EtOH extract of L. lanata were
responsible for its antioxidant activities. Numerous studies exhibited a
strong relationship between total phenolic, flavonoid content and
antioxidant activity in fruits, vegetables, and medicinal plants.39-41
Screening of antimicrobial properties of medicinal plants is being
increasingly reported from all over the world. The above results of
antimicrobial activity showed that, all tested concentrations were
significant against studied pathogenic microorganisms. Overall, the
antimicrobial activity of the L. lanata was noticeably more effective
against the growth of bacterial strains compared to the fungal strains.
The results obtained in this assay revealed that extracts were found to
be not inactive against any organism and highest concentration of the
extract was more effective against all microorganisms but showing
highest zone of inhibition against Gram positive bacteria. The results
showed that the mean zone of inhibition produced by positive controls
(tetracycline and nystatin), was larger than those produced by all
concentrations of 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata. This may be
attributed to the fact that plant extracts being in crude form contain
smaller concentrations of bioactive compounds.42
Wound healing is a complex and intricate process initiated in response
to an injury that restores the function and integrity of damaged tissues.
The four phases of wound healing43 requires the collaborative efforts
of different tissues. There are three stages of wound healing process
such as inflammation, proliferation and remodeling. These are all
classic symptoms of inflammation due to the release of
prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and ROS. This involves blood clotting
and platelet aggregation, inflammatory response to injury, fibrin
formation, altered ground substances, re-epithelialization and
angiogenesis. Depletion in wound area is made by the action of
myofibroblasts, which set up a clench on the wound edges and
contract themselves.
14
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
The inhabitation of pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus,
Streptococcus and Pseudomonas in wounds normally may lead to
infection of wounds which may result in the formation of chronic
wounds.44 In the present study, topical application of 50% EtOH
extract of L. lanata showed significant (p<0.05 to p<0.001) increase
in wound contraction and reduced the epithelization periode on the
both infected and uninfected wounds. This increased epithelization
may be due to the effect of L. lanata extract on collegen synthesis.
Wounds are known to be easy portals for infections and provides a
suitable medium for the growth of microorganism and it can be
delayed wound healing process. 45
Several phytochemicals like flavonoids, saponins, tannins, terpenoids,
especially polyphenoles are known to promote wound healing activity
mainly due to their antimicrobial and astringent property, which seem
to be responsible for wound closure and enhanced epithelization as
shown in the present study.46 High-performance liquid
chromatography analysis of the 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata
showed the presence of gallic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid,
protocatechuic acid and ferulic acid as major components. These
compounds have important biological activities and responsible for
antimicrobial activity as well as wound healing activity. Earlier
reports also suggested that, polyphenoles such as caffeic acid 47,
protocatechuic acid48 and ferulic acid49 having a significant positive
role in the healing of wounds. Another important observation of
HPLC chromatogram was that a group of unidentified peaks were
present, which represent some non-identified phytochemical presence
in the sample. These unidentified phytochemicals could also be
responsible for the different biological activities, especially
antimicrobial activity.
There are many evidences suggesting that increased production of
reactive oxygen species (ROS) results in oxidative stress play an
important role in delayed wound healing. Therefore, elimination of
ROS could be an important strategy in healing of chronic wounds. 50
In the present study, we found that in LLEE ointment treated wounds
showing increased level of all antioxidants, which may be responsible
and favorable for faster wound healing and this plant extract may be
useful in the management of abnormal healing and hypertrophic scars.
Although further studies are highly recommended to elucidate the
active compounds and investigate the specific mechanism of action in
cellular and macromolecular levels.
Conclusion
The results obtained from the study showed remarkable antimicrobial
and wound healing activity of L. lanata. The observations also
indicated that 50% EtOH extract of L. lanata exhibited free radical
scavenging activity against DPPH radicals and significantly reducing
power. HPLC analysis revealed the presence of important biologically
active compounds which may be responsible for antimicrobial and
wound healing activity. The study provided sufficient evidences that,
L. lanata might be indeed potential new herbal antimicrobial and
wound healing agents.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the Director, CSIR-National Botanical
Research Institute, Lucknow for the providing necessary facilities and
also CSIR, New Delhi for financial assistance under 12th five year
plan.
References
1. Rosy BA, Joseph H, Rosalie. Phytochemical, pharmacognostical,
antimicrobial activity of Indigofera spalathoides Vahl. (Fabaceae). Int J Biol
Technol. 2010; 1: 12-15.
2. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Medicinals for the Millennia. Annals NY Acad
Sci. 2001; 953: 3-25.
3. Edeoga1 HO, Okwu DE, Mbaebie BO. Phytochemical constituents of some
Nigerian medicinal plants. Afr J Biotech. 2005; 4: 685-688.
4. Akinmoladun AC, Ibukun EO, Afor E, Akinrinlola BL, Onibon TR,
Akinboboye AO, Obuotor EM, Farombi EO. Chemical constituents and
antioxidant activity of Alstonia boonei. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007;6: 1197-1201.
5. Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP, Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activity of grape
seed (Vitrus vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro. Food Chem.
2001; 73: 285-290.
6. Padmaa M Paarakh, Chansouria JPN, Khosa R.L. Wound healing activity of
Annona muricata extract. J Pharm Res. 2009; 2: 404-406.
7. Subramoniam A, Evans DA, Rajasekharan S, Nair GS. Effect of
Hemigraphis colorata (Blume) H. G. Hallier leaf on wound healing and
inflammation in mice. Indian J Pharmacol. 2001; 33:283-285.
8. Biswas TK, Mukherjee B. Plant medicines of Indian origin for wound
healing activity: a review. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2003; 2:25-39.
9. Muthu C, Ayyanar M, Raja N, Ignacimuthu S. Medicinal plants used by
traditional healers in Kancheepuram district of Tami Nadu. Indian J
Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2006; 2:43-53.
10. Veerapur VP, Palkar MB, Srinivasa H, Kumar MS, Patra S, Rao PGM,
Srinivasan KK. Effect of ethanol extract of Wrightia tinctoria bark on wound
healing in rats. J. Natural Remedies. 2004; 4(2): 155-159.
11. Girach RD, Aminuddin PA, Siddioui PA, Khan S.A.Traditional plant
remedies among the Kondh of district dhenkanal (Orissa). Int J Pharm. 1994;
32:274-283.
12. Chagnon M. General pharmacologic inventory of medicinal plants of
Rwanda. J Ethnopharmacol. 1984; 12: 239-251.
13. Nazir AP, Negi AK, Todaria NP. Traditional uses of medicinal plants of
Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. Nature & Science. 2010; 8(6): 57-61.
14. Yanfg LL, Yen KY, Kiso Y, Kikino H. Antihepatotoxic actions of
formosan plant drugs. J Ethnopharmacol. 1987; 19:103-110.
15. Verma S, Chauhan NS. Indigenous medicinal plants knowledge of Kunihar
forest division, District Solan. Indian J Tradit Know. 2007; 6:494-497.
16. Singh H. Importance of local names of some useful plants in
ethnobotanical study. Indian J Tradit Know. 2008; 7: 365-370.
17. Lin CC. Crude drugs used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in Taiwan.
Am J Chin Med. 1992; 20:269-279.
18. Unani BG, Borah A, Wann SB, Singh HR, Devi B, Bhattacharjee M.
Phytochemical and antibacterial study of traditional medicinal plants of North
East India on Escherichia coli. Asian J Exp Sci. 2009; 23 (1): 103-108.
19. Ramalingam R, Ravinder AN, Bindu MB, Nagulu M, Bala AS. Free
radical scavenging and antiepileptic activity of Leucas lanata. J Pharm Res.
2013a; 6:368-372.
20. Ramalingam R, Ravinder AN, Bindu MB, Nagulu M, Bala AS.
Antiparkinson’s and free radical scavenging study of ethyl acetate fraction of
ethanolic extract of Leucas lanata. Drug Invention Today 2013b; 5: 251-255.
21. Trease GE, Evans WC. Pharmacognosy. 13th ed. Bailliere Tindall Ltd,
London; 1989, pp. 176-180.
22. Harborne JB. Phytochemical method. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London;
1993, pp.135-203.
23. Woisky R, Salatino A. Analysis of propolis: some parameters and
procedures for chemical quality control. J. Apic. Res. 1998; 37: 99-105.
24. Bray HG, Thorp WV. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in
metabolism. Methods in Biochemistry Analysis. 1954; 1:27-52.
25. Blois MS. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical.
Nature. 1958; 181: 1199-1200.
15
The Journal of Phytopharmacology
26. Oyaizu M. Studies on product of browning reaction prepared from glucose
amine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition. 1986; 44: 307-315.
27. Ahlam AA, Hazaa AM, Afaf W, Sadri S, Amzad H, Sohail A. In vitro
antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial screening of the leaves of
Acridocarpous orientalis, native to Sultanate of Oman. British J Pharm Res.
2013; 3(4): 734-742.
28. Quinto E & Santos M. Microbiology, In: edited by Guevarra BQ (Espana
Manila, Philippines: University of Santo Tomas Publishing House), 2005.
29. Zimmerman M. Ethical guidelines for investigation of experimental pain in
conscious animals. Pain. 1983; 16:109-110.
47. Song HS, Park TW, Sohn UD, Shin YK, Choi BC, Kim CJ, Sim SS. The
Effect of Caffeic Acid on Wound Healing in Skin-incised Mice. Korean J
Physiol Pharmacol. 2008; 12: 343-347.
48. Borate AR ,Suralkar AA, Birje SS, Malusare PV, Bangale PA.
Antihyperlipidemic effect of protocatechuic acid in fructose induced
hyperlipidemia in rats. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences.
2011; 2 (4):456.
49. Ghaisas MM, Kshirsagar SB, Sahane RS. Evaluation of wound healing
activity of ferulic acid in diabetic rats. Int Wound J. 2014; 11(5):523-532.
50. Dissemond J, Goos M, Wagner SN. The role of oxidative stress in the
pathogenesis and therapy of chronic wounds. Hautarzt. 2002; 53: 718–723.
30. Cooper JL, Gunns C. Dispensing for pharmaceutical students, 12th ed. In:
Carter SL (Ed.), CBS Publisher and Distributors, Delhi, 1987, pp. 199-200.
31. Nayak SB, Pinto Pereira LM, Maharaj D. Wound healing activity of
Carica papaya L. in experimentally induced diabetic rats. Indian J Exp Bio.
2007; 45: 739–743.
32. Tramontina VA, Machado MA, Nogueira F, Gda R, Kim SH, Vizzioli MR,
Toledo S. Effect of bismuth subgallate (local hemostatic agent) on wound
healing in rats. Histological and histometric findings. Braz. Dent. J. 2002; 13:
11-16.
33. Shukla A, Rasik AM, Patnaik GK. Depletion of reduced glutathione,
ascorbic acid, vitamin E and antioxidant defence enzymes in a healing
cutaneous wound. Free Radical Res. 1997; 26, 93-101.
34. Aebi HU. Catalase in Methods in Enzymatic Analysis, vol. 3, Academic
Press, New York, NY, USA, edited by Η.U. Bergmeyer; 1983.
35. Cohn VH, Lyle J. A fluorometric assay for glutathione. Anal Biochem.
1966; 14: 434-440.
36. Niranjan A., Barthwal J., Lehri A., Singh D.P., Govindrajan,R., Rawat
A.K.S., Amla D.V. Development and validation of an HPLC-UV-MS-MS
method for identification and quatification of polyphenols in Artimisia pallens
L. Acta chromartographica. 2009; 21(1): 105-116.
37. Bonjar GHS, Nik AK, Aghighi S. Antibacterial and antifungal survey in
plants used in indigenous herbal-medicine of south east regions of Iran. J Biol
Sci. 2004; 4:405-412.
38. Hossain MA, Rahman SM. Total phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant
activity of tropical fruist pineapple. Food Res Int. 2011; 44(3): 672-676.
39. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZE, Rahmat A. Antioxidant Activities, Total
phenolics and flavonoids content in two varieties of Malaysia young ginger
(Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Molecules. 2010; 15:4324-4333.
40. Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao, L, Oomah BD. Antioxidant activity and total
phenolics in selected fruits, vegetable and grain products. J Agric. Food Chem.
1998; 46: 4113-4117.
41. Dorman HJD, Kosar M, Kahlos K, Holm Y, Hiltunen R. Antioxidant
properties and composition of aqueous extracts from Mentha species, hybrids,
varieties and cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003; 51: 4563-4569.
42. Chew AL, Jeyanthi JAJ, Sasidharan S. Antioxidant and antibacterial
activity of different parts of Leucas aspera. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;
2(3): 176-180.
43. Puratchikody A, Nithya C, Nagalakshmi G. Wound healing activity of
Cyperus rotundus Linn. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2006; 68: 97-101.
44. Frantz RA. Identifying infection in chronic wounds. Nursing. 2005;
35(7):73.
45. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrond DG Wound microbiology and
associated approaches to wound management. Clin. Microbiol Rev. 2001;
14:244-269.
46. Ilodigwe EE, Ndunagu LU, Ajaghaku DL, Utoh-Nedosa UA. Evaluation of
the Wound Healing Activity of a Polyherbal Remedy. Ann Bio Res. 2012;
3(11): 5393- 5398.
16