Agriculture & Forestry, Vol. 65 Issue 2: 39-51, 2019, Podgorica 39 DOI: 10.17707/AgricultForest.65.2.03 Farhad ASADI, Afrooz ALIMOHAMADI 1 ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF POPULUS CASPICA AND POPULUS ALBA CUTTINGS UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS SUMMARY Understanding the function of poplar species under different irrigation regimes is critical for water resources and ecosystem sustainable management. This study was conducted in order to understand the performance (survival and height growth) of two poplar species (Populus alba L. and Populus caspica Bornm.) cuttings in two lengths (15 cm and 25 cm) under three irrigation treatments (7-day, 14-day and 21-day intervals). One trial was established using split-split-plot design with three replications. Every two weeks height and number of remaining cuttings were measured. Results showed the survival average at the end of periods for 7-day, 14-day and 21-day irrigation treatments were 83.33 %, 22.08 % and 0 %, respectively, for P. alba and P. caspica were 25.89 % and 44.39 %, respectively and for cuttings in 15 and 25 cm were 29.61 % and 40.66 % respectively. The results of two-way analysis of variance of the survival among cuttings indicated that the differences survival among cuttings were all marked under the four treatments and analysis of variance of the height growth indicated that except under the size treatment, the differences height growth among cuttings were all marked under the other three treatments. Keywords: Populus caspica, Populus alba, irrigation interval, height growth, survival. INTRODUCTION Poplar is an excellent candidate for short rotation coppice cultures, which rely on species that is characterized by fast growth and dynamic production of biomass (Payamnour et al, 2013). This species as an alternative source for wood production (Alimohamadi et al. 2012) have been planted in Iran for many years. Annual production of poplar plantations, according to available statistics, is more than triple the production of Caspian forests (the only commercial forests in Iran) while their area is less than 10 percent of Caspian forests area (Bozorgmehr et al. 2014). Poplar growth is highly dependent on the moisture content of the soil (Bagheri et al. 2012) and soil water can exert an important control on poplar growth (Dong et al. 2011, Hogg et al. 2013). Accordingly having a permanent resource of water is a primary need of poplar plantation. Since Iran is in the arid 1 Farhad Asadi, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Sari, IRAN, Afrooz Alimohamadi, (corresponding author: afrooz.alimohamadi@pnu.ac.ir), Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Payame Noor University (PNU), Teheran, IRAN. Notes: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Authorship Form signed online. 40 Asadi and Alimohamadi zone which receives less than a third of world average precipitation (Badripour, 2006), shortage of water resources is a major obstacle to successful poplar cultivation. In order to increase the productivity of poplar plantations in arid and semiarid lands, high efficiency irrigation strategies must be used. The efficiency of water use can be examined through assessment of poplar responses which differ from one species to another and from one age to other age. Various indices have been used to find the poplar responses to irrigation which consist of: a) growth traits such as diameter at breast height (Bagheri et al. 2012, Shock et al. 2005), basal area at breast height (O’Neill and Allen 2015, Voltas et al. 2006), total height (Bagheri et al. 2012, Shock et al. 2005), stem height (Bagheri et al. 2012), crown diameter (Bagheri et al. 2012), relative growth rate (Karačić and Weih 2006), volume (O’Neill and Allen 2015, Bagheri et al. 2012, BaoFang et al. 2007, Shock et al. 2005), biomass (Monclus et al. 2009, Karačić and Weih 2006), survival (O’Neill and Allen 2015, Saeidi and Azadfar 2009, Van den Driessche et al. 2003), radial growth (Giovannelli et al. 2002), root number (BaoFang et al. 2007); b) physiological characteristics such as foliar nutrition (Shock et al. 2005), mesophyll-to-stomatal conductance ratio (Rancourt et al. 2015), photosynthetic performance (Zhu et al. 2014; Saeidi and Azadfar, 2009, Fengjun et al. 2006 ), transpiration (Samuelson et al. 2007), leaf-specific hydraulic conductance (Samuelson et al. 2007), canopy stomatal conductance (Samuelson et al. 2007), stem water potential (AiHong et al. 2009); c) morphological traits such as leaf area (Monclus et al. 2009, BaoFang et al. 2007, Samuelson et al. 2007); d) phenology events such as bud-burst (Bagheri et al. 2012, Sera and Pons 2013), leaf expansion (Bagheri et al. 2012), leaf abscission (Bagheri et al. 2012), flowering (Bagheri et al. 2012; Sera and Pons 2013) and e) anatomical characters such as wood anatomy (Cocozza et al. 2011). In order to develop efficient water use strategies in poplar plantations, different irrigation regimes can be conducted. Irrigation regime which is determined by the rate of irrigation, irrigation frequency (intervals), and time of water applications to crops. Some research has been undertaken on high efficiency irrigation regime in poplar plantations. Zhu et al (2014) investigated the effects of changed irrigation (water-saving irrigation and flood irrigation) on two poplar species (P. euphratica and P. russkii) growing in arid ecosystems. Results showed that reduced water availability during water-saving irrigation had a moderate but not significant impact on the photosynthesis of the two poplar species. Sera and Pons (2013) analyzed the dynamics of poplars between 2002 and 2008 which comprised periods of water surplus and water scarcity. No difference was observed between periods of water scarcity and water surplus. Bagheri et al (2012) showed significant difference between the 4, 8 and the 12 day irrigation intervals in respect to growth parameters of P. euramericana, P. trichocarpa, P. alba, P. nigra and P. deltoids. Cocozza et al (2011) investigated the correlation between the main ring traits of young poplar clones (P × canadensis and P. deltoides) and irrigation regimes (irrigated with 70 mm of water every week and no-irrigated). Results showed P. deltoides has the potential Assessing the performance of Populus caspica and Populus alba cuttings 41 to recover promptly after drought stress. AiHong et al (2010) in temperate desert zone analyzed the change of water potential of Populus euphratica Oliv. and P. Russkii Jabl under different irrigation volumes. Saeidi and Azadfar (2009) investigated the effect of drought and hydromorphy stresses on net photosynthesis rate and survival of P. nigra , P. deltoides and P. euramericana. Result showed P. deltoides and P. nigra had more resistance to drought stress than hydromorphic. Zomer et al (2007) irrigated their poplar plantations during April to June, when the atmospheric temperature is high with a low level of relative humidity. Fengjun et al (2006) applied four water treatments: wellwatered condition, slight water stress, moderate water stress, and severe water stress. The results revealed that the clones with higher long-term water use efficiency always had strong photosynthetic capacity and optimum root/shoot ratio. Shock et al (2005) applied five irrigation treatments for hybrid poplar consisted of three water application rates using micro sprinklers and two water application rates using drip tape during five years. Result showed drip irrigation with two tapes per tree row resulted in higher tree growth than micro sprinkler irrigation. In Iran, most of the researches about efficient irrigation management have been done on agricultural crops. Furthermore, there is no research available to determine growth response of P. alba and P. caspica as a local and critically endangered species in Caspian forest of Iran (Falah et al 2011) under different irrigation treatments. Given the importance of Poplars and for optimum use of water resources in arid season, in this study we explored the growth response and survival of P. caspica and P. alba cuttings in two lengths to different irrigation intervals. MATERIAL AND METHODS Site Experiments were carried out in the Chamestan forest and rangeland research station located in Noor city (36° 25’ N & 51° 55’ E, 70 m a.s.l), Mazandaran province, Iran. Mean annual temperature and precipitation are 15.8 C° and 840 mm, respectively. Absolute minimum and maximum temperature are -8.5 C° and 36 C°, respectively. Average relative humidity is 78%. Experiment design Cuttings of P. caspica and P. alba in two lengths (15 and 25 cm) were established in a field trial, as a split-split-plot design with three replications. The species as factor A was assigned to whole plots, then the cutting length as factor B was assigned to split-plots within the applications of Factor A, and then split the experimental units used for factor B into sub-sub-plots to receive different irrigation intervals as factor C. For this purpose a total of 108 (three treatments of irrigation intervals, two treatments of cutting lengths, two kinds of species, three pots and three replications) plastic bags were put into a water container with 15 cm depth and 46 cm diameter (Figure 1). The culture medium was a soil with 33 percent clay, 47 percent loam and 21 percent sand. Soil pH and electrical Asadi and Alimohamadi 42 conductivity were 6.58 and 0.57 ds/m, respectively. Percentage of lime, organic carbon and total nitrogen were 1.19, 2.78 and 0.29, respectively and finally the amounts of phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium were 23.78, 420, 175.5 and 37.5 ppm, respectively (Rouhi Moghadam, 2008). The cuttings were planted on February with one cutting in each pot. Weeding operation was done during the growing season. Three different irrigation intervals were applied: 7day intervals, 14-day intervals and 21-day intervals. The amount of irrigation water at each time was 2000 mL for per pot. Figure 1: Cuttings in plastic bags under different treatments Measured objects and statistical analyses In order to calculating the seedling height growth as an appropriate indicator for evaluating the effects of stress (Sadati et al. 2011) and survival under different treatments, every two weeks height and number of remaining cuttings were measured. Ten measurements were performed on April 27th, May 11th, May 25th, June 8th, June 22th, July 6th, July 20th, August 3rd, August 17th and August 31th. Data were evaluated by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for assessing the normality, two-way analysis of variance for analyzing the effects of applied treatments on height growth and survival, Duncan's multiple range test for measuring the differences between irrigation and period treatments. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 21.0. P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results showed (Figures 2 and Figure 3) the percentage survival of cuttings under five treatments (in total twelve treatments). Assessing the performance of Populus caspica and Populus alba cuttings 43 a: P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 7-day irrigation, b: P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 14day irrigation, c: P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 21-day irrigation, d: P. alba cuttings in 25 cm under 7-day irrigation, e: P. alba cuttings in 25 cm under 14-day irrigation, f: P. alba cuttings in 25 cm under 21-day irrigation, g: P. caspica cuttings in 15 cm under 7day irrigation, h: P. caspica cuttings in 15 cm under 14-day irrigation, i: P. caspica cuttings in 15 cm under 21-day irrigation, j: P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 7-day irrigation, k: P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 14-day irrigation, l: P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 21-day irrigation Figure 2. The percentage survival under different treatments during measured periods 44 Asadi and Alimohamadi Figure 3. Survival of study species under three irrigation intervals and two sizes The percentage survival was zero of which three treatments were related to P. alba include the cuttings in 15 cm under 14 and 21-day irrigation intervals and the cuttings in 25 cm under 21-day irrigation intervals and two treatments were related to P. caspica include the cuttings in 15 cm under 21-day irrigation intervals and the cuttings in 25 cm under 21-day irrigation intervals.At the end of periods there was no zero percent survival in any 7-day irrigation treatments but all cuttings under 21-day intervals (all treatments related to two species and two sizes) had died that four deaths had occurred at the ninth period and the P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 21-day irrigation intervals had died at the eighth period. The only treatment with 100 percent survival at the end of periods was related to P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 7-day irrigation intervals. The survival average at the end of periods for 7-day, 14-day and 21-day irrigation treatments were 83.33 %, 22.08 % and 0 %, respectively, for P. alba and P. caspica were 25.89 % and 44.39 %, respectively and for cuttings in 15 and 25 cm were 29.61 % and 40.66 % respectively. The average height growth of P. alba and P. caspica were 7.44 cm and 9.62 cm. Furthermore, for 7-day, 14-day and 21-day irrigation intervals were 9.25 cm, 8.68 cm and 7.67 cm, respectively and the average height growth of cuttings in 15 cm and 25 cm were 8.50 cm and 8.56 cm (Figures 4 and Figure 5). The maximum height growth of four treatments occurred during the fourth period, for four others occurred during fifth period, two treatments during sixth Assessing the performance of Populus caspica and Populus alba cuttings 45 period had maximum height growth and two treatments during first period had maximum height growth (Figure 4). a: P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 7-day irrigation, b: P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 14day irrigation, c: P. alba cuttings in 15 cm under 21-day irrigation, d: P. alba cuttings in 25 cm under 7-day irrigation, e: P. alba cuttings in 25 cm under 14-day irrigation, f: P. alba cuttings in 25 cm under 21-day irrigation, g: P. caspica cuttings in 15 cm under 7day irrigation, h: P. caspica cuttings in 15 cm under 14-day irrigation, i: P. caspica cuttings in 15 cm under 21-day irrigation, j: P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 7-day irrigation, k: P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 14-day irrigation, l: P. caspica cuttings in 25 cm under 21-day irrigation Figure 4. The height growth under different treatments during measured periods Asadi and Alimohamadi 46 Figure 5: Height growth of study species under three irrigation intervals and two sizes The results of two-way analysis of variance of the survival among cuttings (Table 1) indicated that the differences among cuttings were all marked under the four treatments (length, species, irrigation intervals and periods). Based on Duncan's multiple range test, irrigation intervals were classified in two separate groups: 21-day and 14-day irrigation treatments as first group and 7- day irrigation treatment as second group. Furthermore, periods based on multiple comparisons were divided into 3 groups (Figure 6). Table 1: Two-way analysis of variance for survival of study species under irrigation and size treatments Treatment species length irrigation period species × length species × irrigation species × period length × irrigation length × period irrigation × period df 1 1 2 9 1 2 9 2 9 18 F 40.385 7.666 26.754 75.899 .160 9.162 1.108 .939 .521 18.170 p Value .000** .006** .000** .000** .690ns .000** .357ns .392ns .859ns .000** Significance values are indicated as: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ns non-significant Assessing the performance of Populus caspica and Populus alba cuttings 47 The results of two-way analysis of variance of the height growth among cuttings (Table 2) indicated that except under the size treatment, the differences height growth among cuttings were all marked under the other three treatments (species, irrigation intervals and periods). Based on Duncan's multiple range test, irrigation intervals were classified in two separate groups: 21- day irrigation treatment as first group and 14- day and 7- day irrigation treatments as second group. Furthermore, periods based on multiple comparisons were divided into 5 groups (Figure 7). Figure 6: Grouping of periods based on mean survival Table 2: Two-way analysis of variance for height growth of study species under irrigation and size treatments Treatment df F p Value species 1 31.505 .000** length 1 2.077 .151ns irrigation 2 6.997 .001** period 8 64.840 .000** species × length 1 2.992 .085ns species × irrigation 2 .398 .672ns species × period 8 5.883 .000** length × irrigation 2 .497 .609ns length × period 8 2.990 .003** irrigation × period 16 6.516 .000** Significance values are indicated as: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ns non-significant Owing to limited water resources, irrigation interval is more important than irrigation volume in conventional and industrial poplar plantation systems (Bagheri et al. 2012). According to this our goal was to examine the more efficient irrigation regime for P. caspica and P. alba plantations. The results of applying three irrigation intervals during four months indicated that all cuttings 48 Asadi and Alimohamadi under 21-day irrigation intervals after about three months died. Furthermore the only 22 percent of the cuttings under 14-day irrigation intervals survived at the end of period, but 83 percent of cuttings under 7-day irrigation intervals survived, therefore it might be concluded that these irrigation regimes (14-day and 21-day) are not appropriate for poplar wood production. This conclusion is comparable with the work of Bagheri et al (2012) that showed all the clones of P.euramericana, P.trichocarpa, P. alba, P. nigra and P. deltoides have intensive growth reduction at the 12-day interval irrigation in comparison 4-day and 8-day regime, but there was no difference between 4-day and 8-day irrigation intervals. Moreover Hara (2004) suggested weekly irrigation during the dry months for high intensity production of poplar. Chaghaii (2016) believed in areas where there is no groundwater the irrigation intervals may be reduced to 10-day and soil should be completely full of water, but on windy sites with sandy soil the irrigation intervals may be reduced to 7-5 day. Some researchers suggest that the irrigation intervals should not be considered the same and according to local conditions should be given more flexibility on warm days (Bagheri et al. 2012, Zomer et al. 2007). Figure 7: Grouping of periods based on mean height growth Unlike this fact that P. alba is known as high drought tolerance species (Edward et al. 1994) the present result showed the survival average at the end of periods and average height growth of P. alba cuttings are significantly less than P. caspica cuttings and therefore P. alba than P. caspica are more sensitive to longer intervals of irrigation, but Bagheri et al (2012) showed P. alba clones than other study poplar clones are less affected by drought conditions and have the same performance at three irrigation intervals (4, 8 and 12-day). The results showed the survival of cuttings in 25 cm length are significantly more than cuttings in 25 cm length, although there was no significant difference between height growths of cuttings in two lengths. These results are confirmed by some studies that showed the longer the cuttings, the higher are the survival (Singh Thakur et al. 1995, Rossi, 1991). Assessing the performance of Populus caspica and Populus alba cuttings 49 Since potential growth of poplar is highly dependent on the amount of applied irrigation (Shock et al. 2002) and soil moisture (Kharytonov et al. 2017) therefore the improvement of water use efficiency especially in arid areas with regard to limited water supply is a key objective to improve the sustainability of cultivated poplar (Rancourt et al. 2015). Water-saving irrigation (Zhu et al. 2014) and increasing the intervals of irrigation (Bagheri et al. 2012) could be as economical practices for managing water use in such areas, As our goal was to examine the effect of different irrigation intervals on survival and height growth of two poplar species. Furthermore, management of irrigation intervals owing to water influence on pest management is very important. As the work of Tahriri Adabi et al (2013) showed high provided amount of water in 4 days interval in comparison to 8 and 12 days, make poplar species and clones more susceptible against pest. It is worth mentioning that today using treated wastewater for poplar irrigation is suggested as an alternative strategy for water supply problems in semi-arid to arid areas (Houda et al. 2016). CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed that 1) survival of study poplar was found to be dependent on irrigation intervals; 2) the best performance (survival and height growth) of study poplar was under 7-day irrigation interval; 3) P. caspica has relatively higher water-stress resistance than P. alba; 4) longer cuttings than shorter cuttings had higher survival. REFERENCES AiHong, F., YaNing, C., WeiHong, L. (2010): Analysis on the change of water potential of Populus euphratica Oliv. and P. Russkii Jabl under different irrigation volumes in temperate desert zone. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55: 965-972. Alimohamadi, A., Asadi, F., Aghdaei, R.T. (2012): Genetic diversity in Populus nigra plantations from west of Iran. Annals of Forest Research, 56, 165-178. Badripour, H. (2006): Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles: Islamic republic of Iran, FAO. 34pp. Bagheri, R., Ghasemi, R., Calagari, M., Merrikh, F. (2012): Effect of different irrigation intervals on superior poplar clones yield. Iranian Journal of Forests and Poplar Research, 20: 357-369. BaoFang, W., XiaoHui, Y., ZePing, J., YuGguang, H., Jing Bo, Z. (2006): The responses of soil properties and tree's growth to irrigation in poplar timber woodland of arid. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 6: 156-162. Bozorgmehr, A., Nemati, A., Zakeri, E. (2014): Characterizing the Socioeconomic factors influencing poplar plantation in North. Iranian journal of Forests and Poplar Research, 22: 711-723. Cocozza, C., Giovannelli, A., Traversi, M.L., Castro, G., Cherubini, P., Tognetti, R. (2011): Do tree-ring traits reflect different water deficit responses in young poplar clones (Populus × canadensis Mo ¨nch ‘I-214’ and P. deltoides ‘Dvina’. Trees, 25: 975-985. 50 Asadi and Alimohamadi Dong, W.Y., Qin, J., Li, J.Y., Zhao, Y., Nie, L.S., Zhang, Z.Y. (2011): Interactions between soil water content and fertilizer on growth characteristics and biomass yield of Chinese white poplar (Populus tomentosa Carr.) seedlings. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 57: 303–312. Fengjun, Z., Yingbail, S., Rongfu1, G., Xiaohua, S., Bingyu, Z. (2006): Physiological foundation for the differences of long-term water use efficiency among Populus deltoides clones. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26: 2079-2086. Gilman, E.F., Dennis, G., Watson, D.G. (1994): Fact Sheet ST-499: Populus alba. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Service. 30 pp. Giovannelli, A., Castro, G., Scaletti, L., Fragnelli, G., Facciotto, G., Giorcelli, A., Macchioni, N., Capretti, C., Crivellaro, A., Brunetti, M. (2002): Effect of different irrigation regimes on radial growth and wood properties of two poplar clones. International Symposium on Wood Science and Technology, Pacifico Yokohama, Japan. 27-28. Hara, S.S. (2004) Agroforestry in northern India: A unique success story. First World Congress of Agroforestry, Orlando, USA. Hogg, E.H., Barr, A.G., Black, T.A. (2013): A simple soil moisture index for representing multi-year drought impacts on aspen productivity in the western Canadian interior. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 178-179: 173–182. Houda, Z., Bejaoui, Z., Albouchi, A., Gupta, DK., Corpas, F.J. (2016): Comparative study of plant growth of two poplar tree species irrigated with treated wastewater, with particular reference to accumulation of heavy metals (Cd, Pb, As, and Ni). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188: 99. Karačić, A., Weih, M. (2006): Variation in growth and resource utilization among eight poplar clones grown under different irrigation and fertilization regimes in Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg, 30:115-124. Kharytonov, M., Babenko, M., Martynova N., Rula I., Sbytna M., Fuchilo Y. (2017): The poplar saplings survival in reclaimed mine land depending on clone and root treatment. Agriculture and Forestry, 63: 141-15. Monclus, R., Villar, M., Barbaroux, C., Bastien, C., Fichot, C., Delmotte, F.M., Delay, D., Petit, M., Brechet, C., Dreyer, E., Brignolasi, F. (2009): Productivity, wateruse efficiency and tolerance to moderate water deficit correlate in 33 poplar genotypes from a Populus deltoides × Populus trichocarpa F 1 progeny. Tree Physiology, 29: 1329-1339. O’Neill, M.K., Allen, S.C. (2015): Evaluation of hybrid poplar grown under four irrigation treatments. NMSU Agricultural Science Center, Annual Report: 100106. Payamnour, V., Hashemi, S., Jafari Mofidabadi, A., Ahmadi, A. (2013): Inter-specific and inter-generic hybridization in Salicaceac (Populus nigra × and P. nigra × Salix alba) using an embryo rescue technique. Agriculture and Forestry, 59: 59-65 Rancourt, G.T., Éthier, G., Pepin, S. (2015): Greater efficiency of water use in poplar clones having a delayed response of mesophyll conductance to drought. Tree Physiology, 35: 172-184. Rossi, P. (1991): Length of cuttings in juvenile development of a hybrid poplar clone. New Forests, 5: 211-218. Rouhi Moghadam, E., Hosseini, S.M., Ebrahimi, E., Tabari, M., Rahmani, A. (2008): Comparison of growth, nutrition and soil properties of pure stands of Quercus Assessing the performance of Populus caspica and Populus alba cuttings 51 castaneifolia and mixed with Zelkova carpinifolia in the hyrcanian forests of Iran. Forest Ecology and Management, 255: 1149-1160. Sadati, S.E., Tabari, M., Assareh, M.H., Heidari Sharifabad, H., Fayaz, P. (2011): Response of Populus caspica Bornm. seedlings to flooding. Iranian Journal of Forests and Poplar Research, 19: 340-355. Saeidi, Z., Azadfar, D. (2009): Effect of hydromorphy and drought stresses on net photosynthesis rate and viability for three poplar species. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology, 16: 93-106. Samuelson, L.J., Stokes, T.A., Coleman, M.D. (2007): Influence of irrigation and fertilization on transpiration and hydraulic properties of Populus deltoids. Tree Physiology, 27: 765-774. Serra, P., Pons, X. (2013): Two Mediterranean irrigation communities in front of water scarcity: A comparison using satellite image time series. Journal of Arid Environments, 98; 41-51. Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G. (2005): Micro-irrigation alternatives for hybrid poplar (ed. Saunders L.D.), Oregon State University, Ontario, 139-151. Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G., Seddigh, M., Saunders, L.D. (2002): Water requirements and growth of irrigated hybrid poplar in a semi-arid environment in eastern Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 17: 46-53. Singh Thakur, N., Chauhan, S.K., Sharma, R. (1995): Effect of Cutting Source and Size on the Poplar (Populus deltoides Marsh.) Nursery. Journal of Forest Science, 32: 73-77. Tahriri Adabi, S., Sadeghi, S.E., Bagheri, R. (2013): Effects of different irrigation intervals on monosteria unicostata densities in nine poplar species and clones in Karaj. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 8: 477-485. Van den Driessche, R., Rude, W., Martens, L. (2003): Effect of fertilization and irrigation on growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedlings over three seasons. Forest Ecology and Management, 186: 381-389. Voltas, J., Serrano, L., Hernaındez, M., Pemaın, J. (2006): Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange and stem growth of four euramerican hybrid poplars under different watering regimes. New Forests. 31: 435-451. Zhu, C.G., Chen, Y.N., Li, W.H., Yang, Y.H. (2014): Photosynthetic performance of two poplar species in shelterbelt under water-saving irrigation in arid northwest China. Nordic Journal of Botany, 32: 602-610. Zomer, R.J., Bossio, D.A., Trabucco, A., Yuanjie, L., Gupta, D.C., Singh, V.P. (2007): Trees and water: Smallholder agroforestry on Irrigated lands in northern India. International Water Management Institute, Sri Lanka. 39p.