Turk J Bot (2016) 40: 394-401 © TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/bot-1505-6 Turkish Journal of Botany http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ Research Article Bellevalia vuralii B.Şahin & Aslan (Asparagaceae): a new species from SE Turkey 1, 2 3 4 Bilal ŞAHİN *, Serdar ASLAN , Osman KARABACAK , Esra MARTİN 1 Yapraklı Vocational School, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey 2 Department of Forest Botany, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey 3 Polatlı Faculty of Science and Literature, Gazi University, Polatlı, Ankara, Turkey 4 Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram, Konya, Turkey Received: 05.05.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 01.01.2016 Final Version: 07.06.2016 Abstract: Bellevalia vuralii B.Şahin & Aslan is described as a new species of Bellevalia from southeast Turkey. As well as its morphological characteristics and classification with regards to sections, its description, ecology, and relationship with related species are presented and discussed. The somatic chromosome number of these species was defined to be 2n = 8. Key words: Bellevalia, Asparagaceae, Siirt, Turkey 1. Introduction Bellevalia species are distributed in three different phytogeographical regions: Mediterranean, SaharoSindian, and Irano-Turanian (Feinbrun-Dothan, 1940). The Irano-Turanian phytogeographical region is the most important, with high distribution of the species. The genus is represented by 4 sections with 45 species according to Feinburn-Dothan. When distribution and endemic regions are examined, the Irano-Turanian region is observed as the main area for species distribution, while Iran and Turkey are introduced as areas where new species are to be expected (Feinburn-Dothan, 1940). The genus is represented by 6 sections (FeinbrunDothan, 1940; Persson and Wendelbo, 1979; Wendelbo, 1980) with approximately 70 species according to studies published around the world (Gürdal et al., 2014; Karabacak et al., 2014, 2015). The richness in the diversity of the species lies in its distinctive characteristics regarding leaf width and pubescence, raceme shape and density, pedicel length in relation to perianth length, perianth length, the tube:lobe ratio, perianth color, and anther color (Cowley et al., 1994). Within the Flora of Turkey, there are 18 species, 7 of which are endemic (Wendelbo, 1984). Later, 3 more species were added in the second additional volume (Özhatay, 2000). Following the introduction of B. leucantha K.Perss. (Persson, 2006), a checklist was published (Tugay, 2012). Tugay listed 23 species in the checklist by taking the synonyms and questionable records into consideration. B. * Correspondence: felicyntoukand@yahoo.com 394 glauca Kunth is replaced by B. chrisii Yıldırım & B.Şahin (Yıldırım et al., 2014). The number of Bellevalia species increased in Turkey in recent years with new studies: B. malatyaensis Uzunh. & H.Duman, B. pseudolongipes Karabacak & Yıldırım, B. koyuncui Karabacak & Yıldırım, B. pseudofominii Özhatay & E.Kaya, B. undulatifolia Özhatay, Gürdal & E.Kaya, and finally B. sirnakensis (Yıld.) Yıld. (Uzunhisarcıklı et al., 2013; Gürdal et al., 2014; Karabacak et al., 2014, 2015; Yıldırımlı, 2015). Unless otherwise specified, the anther color of Bellevalia species is either violet or variations of violet (Wendelbo, 1984). As a matter of fact, there are only 2 species reported in the monograph with a different anther color, yellow (B. dichroa Hausskn. ex Bornm. and B. fominii Woronow) (Feinbrun-Dothan, 1940). In the floras of other countries written later on, violet is the dominant anther color and only a few species with yellow anthers are reported (Boissier, 1865–1888; Komarov, 1968; Wendelbo, 1990). In the Turkish flora, there are 18 Bellevalia species. Three of the species are distributed within the eastern part of the country and one of which, later reported as a synonym, has yellow anthers: B. modesta Wendelbo, B. pycnantha (K.Koch) Losinsk., and B. paradoxa (Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Boiss. (Wendelbo, 1984). Moreover, 6 out of the 11 species identified later also have yellow anthers and 8 of these are distributed in the eastern part of the country: B. edirnensis Özhatay & B.Mathew, B. anatolica B.Mathew & Özhatay, B. leucantha, B. pseudolongipes, B. koyuncui, and B. sirnakensis (Wendelbo, 1984; Özhatay et al., 1991b; ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot Cowley et al., 1994; Persson, 2006; Gürdal et al., 2014; Karabacak et al., 2014, 2015; Yıldırımlı, 2015). The area where the samples are gathered is one of the branches of the River Dicle, Botan stream valley, on which the Ilısu dam is planned to be constructed. The floristic structure of the area, which is composed of steppe and degraded oak coppices, is still not fully discovered and that is why even local studies may reveal new improvements. Recently, Salvia siirtica (Kahraman et al., 2011) was described as a new species from Siirt. Furthermore, Michauxia nuda A.DC. (Aslan et al., 2010), Silene monerantha Williams (Kaya and Ertekin, 2009), and Teucrium chasmophyticum Rech.f. (Dönmez, 2006) are recorded as new species collected from the Botan stream valley. Furthermore, the valley of the River Dicle is home for the best population of Echinops phaeocephalus Hand.Mazz., which is a species with a rare distribution. Some studies of different Bellevalia species have been carried out using cytogenetics. The somatic chromosome numbers of the genus Bellevalia are counted as 2n = 8, 12, 16, 17, 20, 24, 32, 33, 35. In addition, the basic chromosome number is reported on Bellevalia species as x = 4 (Bothmer and Wondelbo, 1981; Özhatay et al., 1991a; Özhatay and Johnson, 1996; Kypriotakis and Tzanoudakis, 1999; Özhatay, 2002; Johnson, 2003; Jafari et al., 2008; Bareka et al., 2012; Loewenstern et al., 2013). 2. Materials and methods Plant samples were collected during an expedition to the Ilısu basin (River Dicle and its branches). The description of the Turkish flora was done by reviewing the flora of neighboring countries and relevant literature (Komarov, 1968; Wendelbo, 1984, 1990; Feinbrun-Dothan, 1986; Özhatay et al., 1991a; Cowley et al., 1994; Brullo and Minissale, 1997; Kypriotakis and Tzanaoudakis, 1999; Tan et al., 2007; Jafari and Maussoumi, 2008; APG III, 2009; Brullo et al., 2009; Shuka, 2010; Karabacak et al., 2014). Herbarium specimens (GAZI) and live materials (Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanic Garden: NGBB) were analyzed for comparison. After it was understood that it was a new species, flowering and fruit samples were collected again during another expedition to the area. The description of the new species is based on approximately 20 samples. The threat classification was determined in accordance with the IUCN (2012). The karyotype was made on somatic metaphases using Image System Analysis (Bs200Pro). Root meristems from germinating bulbs collected in the wild were used. Root tips were pretreated with α-monobromonaphthalene at 4 °C for 16 h. Root tips were fixed with Carnoy’s for 24 h at 4 °C. Before staining, the material was hydrolyzed with 1 N HCl for 9 min at room temperature. The chromosomes were stained with 2% acetic orcein and mounted in 45% acetic acid. Permanent slides were made by using the standard liquid nitrogen method. Photographs were taken through a BX51 Olympus microscope. Chromosomes were classified using the nomenclature of Levan et al. (1964). 3. Results 3.1. Bellevalia vuralii B.Şahin & Aslan sp. nov. (Figures 1–5). Type: TURKEY, Siirt: Siirt-Eruh yolu, Sağlarca köyü, bozkır, 463 m, 14.04.2009, S. Aslan 3148 & B. Şahin; (holotype: DUOF 5750!, paratypes: ANK!, GAZI!, DUOF!). Diagnosis: Bellevalia vuralii resembles B. malatyaensis and B. kurdistanica. It differs from B. malatyaensis with leaves 10–15 (–20) cm (not 5–10 cm), 4–15 mm (not Figure 1. (A) Habitat and (B) habitus of Bellevalia vuralii. 395 ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot Figure 2. Habitus (A), fruit (B), leaves (C), and anthers (D) of Bellevalia vuralii. 10–25 mm), longer than scape (not shorter than scape), linear-elliptic (not lanceolate-elliptic), apex entire, margin undulate, scarcely ciliate (not apex cucullate, margin entire, distinctly ciliate); pedicel 5–15 mm in flower (not 8–30 mm); anther yellow, dorsally connected, 1–1.5 mm (not violet, basally connected, 0.3 mm); perigon crimson bluish-violet in bud, lobes 2/5 of tube (not white to greenish, lobes 1/2 of tube); capsule obovate-cordate, 8 × 8 mm (not lanceolate-orbicular, 3–7 mm long). It differs from B. kurdistanica with leaves 2–3 (not 5–6); pedicel longer than flowers, erecto-patent (not as long as perianth, arcuate); anther yellow (not lilac); perigon crimson bluish-violate in bud, 5–7 mm (not greenish, 9–11 mm); chromosome number 8 (not 16). Description: Bulb ovoid-subglobose, 1–2 cm diameter, outer tunic coriaceous, brownish; inner tunic papery, pinkish to light brownish. Leaves 2–3(–4), linear-elliptic, undulate, longer than scape in flowering and fruiting time, outer and inner leaves 10–15(–20) cm long; inner leaves 4–8 mm and outer leaves 10–15 mm broad, thin, 396 glaucous; narrowly cartilaginous, minutely papillose. Scape 1(–2), 3–10(–18) cm long, green to yellowish-green. Raceme cylindrical or slightly conical in flowering and fruiting time, rather dense, 3–5(–7) cm long, elongating to c. 10 cm in fruit, rachis purplish to purplish-green in flowering time, yellowish-green in fruiting time. Bracts entire or slightly bilobed, minute, pinkish to purplish, triangular to oblong. Pedicels erect before anthesis, later elongating and becoming recurved, finally elongate and erect, 1–3× longer than flowers, erecto-patent in flowering and fruiting time, horizontally ascending or erect, 5–15 mm long in flowering time, 15–30 mm in fruiting time, purplish to purplish-green. Flowers 15–30 (–35), 5–7 mm long, tubular–campanulate, perianth bluish violet in bud, later pale brownish-green on tube and brownish nerves; perianth tube 3–5 mm long; lobes 2 mm long, 1/3 of tube, subequal, ovate–lanceolate, green to dirty whitish, distinctly shorter than tube. Stamens with flat, narrowly triangular, retuse, dorsally connate filaments attached just below base of perianth lobes; anthers yellowish, 1–1.5 ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot Figure 3. Somatic chromosomes in Bellevalia vuralii. Bar: 10 µm. Figure 4. Ideogram of Bellevalia vuralii. Bar: 10 µm. mm, reaching at least the apex of the lobes and visible in the mouth of the flower. Capsule triquetrous, 8 × 8 mm diameter, retuse at apex, cordate or widely obovate, valves thin, dehiscent, persistent. Seeds globose-ellipsoid, c. 2 mm, black, shiny. Flowering time March to April, 400–500 m, in open forest. Turkish Name: “Dicle Kırsümbülü” Etymology: This species is named in honor of the eminent Turkish botanist and our valued mentor Prof Dr Mecit Vural (Gazi University). Habitat and ecology: Bellevalia vuralii grows in clearings and eroded slopes within oak forests, where Quercus brantii Lindley is dominant. Botan Stream valley, where Sağlarca village is located, is covered with scarcely distributed Q. brantii coppices. In spite of the stream flowing through the area, the bioclimatic structure of the region caused oaks and degraded oak coppices to be interwoven with steppe. Especially highly affected areas by human action are covered with fields and steppe. Other species growing together with the described species within the forest and clearings are as follows: Onosma alborosea Fisch. & C.A.Mey., Juniperus oxycedrus L., Klasea oligocephala (DC.) Greuter & Wagenitz, Cota tinctoria (L.) J.Gay ex Guss. var. tinctoria, Scorzonera papposa DC., Micropus supinus L., Coronilla scorpioides (L.) W.D.J.Koch, Medicago radiata L., Astragalus macrostachys DC., Bunium microcarpum Boiss. & Freyn subsp. microcarpum, Valeriana dioscoridis Sm., Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch., Campanula saxonorum Gand., Microthlaspi perfoliatum (L.) F.K.Mey., Gundelia tournefortii L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Euphorbia craspedia Boiss. Figure 5: Distribution map of B. vuralii, B. kurdistanica, and B. malatyaensis. 397 ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot Table 1. Measurements (µm) of somatic chromosomes in Bellevalia vuralii, (*m = metacentric, **Sm = submetacentric,***St = subtelocentric). Chromosome pair no. Chromosome arms (µm) Long arm (L) Short arm (S) Total length (µm) Arm ratio (L/S) Centromeric index Relative length (%) Chromosome type 1 8.57 5.63 14.20 1.52 35.36 14.03 m* 2 7.43 2.13 9.56 3.48 23.82 5.32 St*** 3 5.61 2.85 8.46 1.97 21.07 7.11 Sm** 4 5.29 2.63 7.93 2.01 19.74 6.56 Sm Total length of haploid complement: 40.15 µm Table 2. Comparison of the morphological characters of B. vuralii, B. malatyaensis, and B. kurdistanica. Characters B. vuralii B. malatyaensis B. kurdistanica Leaves 2–3(–4) 4–15 mm wide Longer than scape Linear-elliptic Apex entire, margin undulate 1–2 (–3) 10–25 mm wide Shorter than scape Lanceolate-elliptic Apex cucullate, margin entire 5–6 14–17 mm wide Longer than scape Lorate-linear Scape 1(–2) 1 1–2 (3) Raceme Slightly conic Rachis purplish in flower yellowish green in fruit Cylindrical Rachis bluish Ellipsoid to cylindrical Rachis violet Pedicel Longer than flowers 5–15 mm in flower, 15–30 (–35) mm in fruit Erecto-patent Longer than flowers 8–30 mm in flower, 35 mm in fruit Horizontal As long as perianth to 20 mm in fruit Arcuate Flowers 15–30 10–22 20–40 Anther Yellow 1–1.5 mm Violet 0.1–0.3 mm Lilac 1.5 mm Tepal and lobes 5–7 mm Crimson purple in bud lobes 1/3 tubes 4.5–6 mm White to greenish in bud lobes ½ tubes (8–) 9–11 mm Greenish white with purplish tinge in bud Lobe ½ tubes Capsules Cordate-obovate, 8 × 8 mm Lanceolate-orbiculare, 3–7 mm long 12–13 × 9–10 mm, suborbicular Chromosomes 8 8 16 Additional specimens examined (paratypes): TURKEY, Siirt: Eruh, Sağlarca köyü, orman açıklığı, 470 m, 06.05.2011, B. Şahin 4890 (GAZI, ANK); Siirt: Eruh, Sağlarca köyü, orman açıklığı, 496 m, 12.04.2014, O. Karabacak 9037 (GAZI, DUOF); ibid., 25.04.2013, O. Karabacak 8823 (GAZI, DUOF, ANK). B. malatyaensis: Malatya: from Erkenek to Gölbaşı, 15 km, 800–1000 m, under the fairly open canopy of a Pinus 398 brutia forest, 17.04.2005, M.E. Uzunhisarcıklı 2019, GAZI. B. kurdistanica: Siirt: Siirt Üniversitesi, Kezer Yerleşkesi, step, 950 m, 11.04.2013, O. Karabacak 8777 (GAZI); Şırnak: Şırnak-Eruh arası 15. km, kumtaşı tepe, 1300 m, 25.04.2004, MKOY 14105, (NGBB-live material); Şırnak: MKOY 14191 (NGBB-live material). Conservation status: The species is only identified by its type locality. The distribution area is estimated to ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot be less than 10 km2. Individuals observed in the living area are very low in number, thought to be less than 1000 individuals. The living area is within the limits of the catchment. Also in this area, oak coppices are replaced with steppe due to the climate and anthropogenic factors. Therefore, the threat classification is suggested to be CR [B2ab(i+iii)] (IUCN, 2012). 3.2. Cytology: Our study showed that the chromosome number of B. vuralii is new for science and 2n = 8 (Figure 3). The shortest chromosome length is 7.93 µm, the longest is 14.20 µm, and haploid chromosome length is 40.15 µm. Chromosome arm ratios are measured as 1.52–3.48. Centromeric index varies between 6.56 and 14.03 and relative lengths vary from 19.74 to 35.36 (Table 1). The karyotype formula of this species consists of one metacentric chromosome pair, two submetacentric chromosome pairs, and one subtelocentric chromosome pair. The ideogram was drawn based on the centromeric index and arranged in decreasing size order (Figure 4). The somatic chromosome number of B. malatyaensis is reported to be 2n = 8 by Uzunhisarcıklı et al. (2013). Besides being the closest species to the one studied in the present paper, both species have the same number of somatic chromosomes; however, there is a difference in regards to karyotype formula and the results of the chromosome analysis. The karyotype formula of B. malatyaensis is 2M+1Sm+1St and for B. vuralii it is 1m+2Sm+1St. Total length of B. malatyaensis chromosomes varies from 13.40 to 24.01 µm. Total haploid length of B. malatyaensis chromosomes is reported as 70.22 µm (Uzunhisarcıklı et al., 2013), whereas total length of B. vuralii chromosomes varies from 7.93 to 14.20 µm, which is shorter than that of B. malatyaensis. Accordingly, total haploid length of B. vuralii chromosomes is determined to be 40.15 µm. The differences in karyotype formulas and analysis results prove that these two species are not cytogenetically similar. 4. Discussion B. vuralii resembles B. malatyaensis and B. kurdistanica according to the Flora of Turkey (Wendelbo, 1984; Uzunhisarcıklı et al., 2013). B. vuralii differs from these species based on the characteristics given in Table 2. According to the identification key in the Flora of Turkey, B. vuralii belongs to the laxly flowered group. The species in this group have wide leaves and long pedicels. However, only B. kurdistanica has narrow leaves and short pedicels. In contrast to the other species generally growing on steppes (Wendelbo, 1984), B. vuralii demonstrates diversity at habitat level as it grows inside forests and open forests. B. vuralii differs with its shorter length and delicate structural characteristics in regards to habitus among other laxly flowered and longer species. In the present study another species having yellow anthers and distributed in the eastern part of Turkey is also identified; with this recent addition, the number of species having yellow anthers rises to 9. Another species, B. wendelboi Maassoumi & Jafari, identified in the Iranian flora also has yellow anthers (Jafari and Maasoumi, 2008). Although the number of species having yellow anthers increases, the systematic importance of anther color is still not known clearly (Feinbrun-Dothan, 1940; Persson and Wendelbo, 1979). Future studies may address taxonomic issues and suggest answers. Most of the recently identified species can generally be placed under existing sections; however, it is seen that because of certain characteristics they do not simply fit into those sections. For instance, B. malatyaensis, under the section Conica, does not match the cylindrical raceme characteristic of the section (Uzunhisarcıklı et al., 2013) or the situation is the same with B. anatolica (Cowley et al., 1994). As for B. vuralii, considering the morphological characteristics of the species, it belongs to sect. Conica; however, having leaves longer than the scape the species can also be categorized under sect. Patens, or, considering the shape of the capsule, the species can also be categorized under sect. Nutans. The current study places B. vuralii species under sect. Conica (Feinbrun-Dothan, 1940); therefore, the number of distributed species in Eastern Anatolia–Iran region under sect. Conica has risen. More than 30 species were identified after FeinbrunDorath and over 25 of these species belong to the IranoTuranian phytogeographical region. Fifteen of these species were identified in Anatolia and 10 were identified in Iran (Jafari and Maasoumi, 2008). Twelve of the species identified in Anatolia were found in areas near Iran. These findings show that endemic species are concentrated in the eastern part of the country, which proves FeinbrunDorath’s forecast (1940). However, the identified species lead to systematic problems because of their characteristics such as anther color, flower, fruit, scape, and raceme and also the section under which they are categorized. Therefore, the status of the sections and the species under these sections needs to be reviewed and revised. It will be beneficial to check the systematic status of the species by incorporating cytological and phytogeographical data. This is necessary for establishing a systematic order among the species. By adding B. vuralii, which is identified in this paper, the number of Bellevalia species in Turkey rises to 30 and the number of endemics to 19. Acknowledgment We would like to thank the Nature Society (Doğa Derneği) for their financial support. 399 ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot References APG III (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc 161: 105-121. Aslan S, Vural M, Şahin B, Ergin E, Kaya ÖF (2010). A new record for Turkey: Michauxia nuda A.DC. (Campanulaceae). Turk J Bot 34: 51-56. Bareka P, Siljak-Yakoviev S, Kamari G (2012). Molecular cytogenetics of Bellevalia (Hyacinthaceae) species occurring in Greece. Plant Syst Evol 29: 421-430. Boissier E (1865–1888). Flora Orientalis: Sive, Enumeratio Plantarum in Oriente a Graecia et Aegypto ad Indiae Fines Hucusque Observatarum (Vol. 1-5), with Supplementum. Basileae: Geneve. Bothmer RV, Wendelbo P (1981). Cytological and morphological variation in Bellevalia. Nordic J Bot 1: 4-11. Brullo C, Brullo S, Pasta S (2009). Bellevalia pelagica (Hyacinthaceae), a new species from the islet of Lampione (Pelagian Archipelago, Sicily). Edinburgh J Bot 66: 65-75. Brullo S, Minissale P (1997). Bellevalia dolichophylla (Liliaceae), a new species from Tunisia. Bocconea 5: 749-754. Cowley J, Özhatay N, Mathew B (1994). New species of Alliaceae & Hyacinthaceae from Turkey. Kew Bulletin 49: 481-489. Dönmez AA (2006). Teucrium chasmophyticum Rech.f. (Lamiaceae): a new record for the Flora of Turkey. Turk J Bot 30: 317-320. Feinbrun-Dothan N (1940). A monographic study on the genus Bellevalia Lapeyr. Palestine J Bot 1: 336-409. Feinbrun-Dothan N (1986). Flora Palaestina. vol. 1. Jerusalem, Israel: Israel Academy Press. Gürdal B, Özhatay N, Koçyiğit M, Kaya E (2014). Bellevalia cinsinden Türkiye geofit florası için 2 yeni tür. In: Kaya E, editor. Türkiye Geofitleri Cilt 3. Atatürk Bahçe Kültürleri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayın No: 96. Yalova. pp. 525-531. Kaya ÖF, Ertekin AS (2009). A new record for the Flora of Turkey: Silene monerantha (Caryophyllaceae). Fl Medit 19: 11-14. Komarov VL (ed.) (1968). Flora of the U.S.S.R. Volume IV Liliiflorae and Microspermae. Jerusalem, Israel: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, pp. 303-310. Kypriotakis Z, Tzanoudakis D (1999). A new species of Bellevalia from Eastern Crete and its confusion with Muscari macrocarpum Sweet. Bot Helv 109: 85-90. Levan A, Fredgra K, Sandberg AA (1964). Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201-220. Loewenstern AB von, Giordani T, Astuti G, Andreucci A, Peruzzi L (2013). Phylogenetic relationships of Italian Bellevalia species (Asparagaceae), inferred from morphology, karyology and molecular systematics. Plant Biosyst 147: 776-787. Özhatay N (2000). Bellevalia Lapeyr. In: Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Başer KHC, editors. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 2). Vol. 11, Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 240-241. Özhatay N (2002). Diversity of bulbous monocots in Turkey with special reference. Chromosome numbers. Pure Appl Chem 74: 547-555. Özhatay N, Johnson MAT, Mathew B (1991a). Chromosome numbers of Turkish Bellevalia species, including a new hexaploid from European Turkey. Bot Chron (Patras) 10: 813-818. Özhatay N, Johnson MAT, Mathew B, Dalgıç G (1991b). A new hexaploid Bellevalia (Hyacinthaceae) from European Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc 107: 89-99. Özhatay N, Johnson MAT (1996). Some karyological remarks on Turkish Allium Sect. Allium, Bellevalia, Muscari, and Ornithogalum Subgen. Ornithogalum. Bocconea 5: 239-249. Persson K, Wendelbo P (1979). Bellevalia hyacinthoides, a new name for Strangweja spicata (Liliaceae). Botaniska Notiser 132: 6570. IUCN (2012). Guidelines for application of IUCN red list criteria at regional and national levels: version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iii + 41 pp. Persson K (2006). One new and one emended species of Bellevalia (Hyacinthaceae) from Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc 150: 253-260. Jafari A, Maassoumi AA (2008). A new species of Bellevalia (Liliaceae/ Hyacinthaceae) from Iran. Edinburgh J Bot 65: 469-473. Shuka L (2010). Bellevalia hyacinthoides (Bertol.) K.Persson, new species for the Albanian Flora. Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica 9: 417-420. Jafari A, Maassoumi AA, Farsi M (2008). Karyological study on Bellevalia and Muscari (Liliaceae) species of Iran. Asian Journal Plant Science 7: 50-59. Johnson MAT (2003). Polyploidy and karyotype variation in Turkish Bellevalia (Hyacinthaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 143: 87-98. Tan K, Stevanović V, Strid A (2007). Distribution and centres of diversity for endemic geophytic monocots in the Balkans. Bocconea 21: 139-146. Kahraman A, Doğan M, Celep F (2011). Salvia siirtica sp. nov. (Lamiaceae) from Turkey. Nordic J Bot 29: 397-401. Tugay O (2012). Bellevalia Lapeyr. In: Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT, editors, Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını. İstanbul, pp. 95-96 (in Turkish). Karabacak O, Yıldırım H, Martin E (2014). Bellevalia pseudolongipes sp. nova (Asparagaceae): a new species from South Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Phytotaxa 188: 209-217. Uzunhisarcıklı E, Duman H, Yılmaz S (2013). A new species of Bellevalia (Hyacinthaceae) from Turkey. Turk J Bot 37: 651655. Karabacak O, Yıldırım H, Martin E (2015). Bellevalia koyuncui sp. nova (Asparagaceae): a new species from South Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Phytotaxa 203: 81-84. Wendelbo P (1980). Notes on Hyacinthus and Bellevalia (Liliaceae) in Turkey and Iran. Notes from the Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh 38: 423-434. 400 ŞAHİN et al. / Turk J Bot Wendelbo P (1984). Bellevalia Lapeyr. In: Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan, K, editors. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 8. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 264-274. Yıldırım H, Altıoğlu Y, Şahin B, Aslan S (2014). Bellevalia chrisii sp. nov. (Asparagaceae) from eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Nordic J Bot 33: 45-49. Wendelbo P (1990). Bellevalia Lapeyr. In: Rechinger KH, Browicz K, Persson K, Wendelbo P, editors. Flora Iranica: Liliaceae II, 165. Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt, pp. 149-165. Yıldırımlı Ş (2015). Miscellaneous nomenclatural and taxonomic corrections on Turkish plants, 3. Ot Sist Bot Derg 21: 29-38. 401