Plant Sociology, Vol. 50, No. 1, June 2013, pp. 91-107
DOI 10.7338/pls2013501/07
Seed germination behavior of two Brachypodium species with a key role in the
improvement of marginal areas
M. Galiè1, S. Casavecchia1, D. Galdenzi1, R. Gasparri1, P. Soriano2, E. Estrelles2 & E. Biondi1
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
2
ICBiBE-Jardí Botànic, University of Valencia, Calle Quart 80, 46008 Valencia, Spain.
1
Abstract
Brachypodium genuense (DC.) Roem. & Schult. and B. rupestre (Host) R. et S. are important components of the vegetation of some widespread
secondary, semi-natural grassland habitats. Both species play a very important role in the development of vegetation series that characterize these
grasslands when they are no longer subjected to grazing or cutting regimes. This led to the gradual disappearance of such habitats and the constitution
of new woods.
In some cases, such as roadsides and marginal areas, it could be convenient to facilitate this serial process by seeding or hydroseeding of native
species of the genus Brachypodium. This approach could led to a better evolution of the soil with the reduction of erosion, the constitution of more
natural woods and the reduction of ires risk. For this reason the germplasm of a population of Brachypodium genuense and four populations of B.
rupestre from Central Apennines was collected and its germination behavior was studied.
Indeed, the early phases of seedling development are critical to the successful establishment of grassland species. Precisely, it was investigated the
inluence of the following factors on germination: seed size and weight, temperature, light and the removal of outer covering structures. Indeed,
each of the above-mentioned factors affects technical aspects of the sowing. Inter- and intra-species variations in seed germination behavior were
evidenced in this work. Light was found to enhance germination in both species, whereas remarkable differences have been found in temperature
requirements between the two species and also among the four populations of B. rupestre.
Keywords: Brachypodium genuense, Brachypodium rupestre, ecology, grassland, marginal areas, seed germination, semi-natural grassland, vegetation series, habitat restoration.
Introduction
The study of semi-natural Apennine grasslands has
been the object of numerous researches since they are
habitat especially endangered after the loss of economic interest that determined their abandonment (Baldoni et al., 2004; Ballerini & Biondi, 2002; Biondi et
al., 2000; Catorci et al., 2012; Catorci et al., 2011a).
The abandonment of agricultural and pastoral activities concerning their management has determined the
start of spontaneous serial processes of vegetation recovery which caused the recovery of potential bush
and wood lora in wide areas of mountain and hilly
areas but also the disappearance of very important environments in terms of phytocoenotic, loristic and,
more in general, ecological biodiversity (Biondi et al.,
2006, 2009, 2012a).
The disappearance or strong reduction of this habitat
affects trophic chains and determines a remarkable
loss of biodiversity at every level, causing a simpliication of the landscape. Therefore, the Habitats Directive
(92/43/EEC) considers semi-natural grasslands conservation very important and possibly their recovery
in terms of speciic and habitat biodiversity. This led to
the census of these habitats in the EU and to the deinition of management plans of the sites of interest which
are currently ongoing in all the Natura 2000 Network.
But, there is a high degree of biodiversity also in
agro-ecosystems, therefore new policies in agriculture (CAP) promote the change of traditional farmlands
into high nature value rural areas where productivity is
strictly linked to conservation of biodiversity (Bignal
& McCracken, 2000; Andersen et al., 2003; Galdenzi
et al., 2012: Paracchini et al., 2008).
The practices that are usually used are the reinstatement of active management and also the removal of
the shrubs that invaded the grassland. But sometimes,
there are some technical problems which are dificult
to overcome. The irst is linked to the serial recovery
process of vegetation started by species of the genus
Brachypodium, which do not whet animals appetite
due to the consistency of their leaves that are rich in
silica and lignin (Catorci et al., 2013; Roggero et al.,
2002) and long rough hairs. Moreover, animals risk to
die if they are obliged to feed with these plants (Scocco et al., 2007; 2012). It is well documented that Brachypodium sp.pl. reduces or stops the natural dynamic
processes in the evolution of grasslands towards more
mature stages of vegetation series (Bonanomi & Allegrezza, 2004; Bonanomi et al., 2006, 2009; Catorci et
al., 2011a; Hurst & John, 1999; Endresz et al., 2005).
The other problem is linked to the dificulty to remove
shrubs since it needs to be followed by a seeding of
herbaceous species. Unfortunately, commercial seed
Corresponding author: Marco Galiè. Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences; Aniadriatic Species Seed Bank, Botanical Garden “Selva di Gallignano", Polytechnic University of Marche, Contrada Selva, I-60020
Gallignano - Ancona, e-mail: m.galie@univpm.it
92
Galiè et al.
mixtures contain species with an extra European origin
and autochthonous seeds are not available. Thus, the
use of such seed mixtures determines a heavy erosion
of biodiversity.
For all these reasons, the research team, that the authors belong to, started studies and projects on this
subject, such as the research here presented.
This research focused on seed germination requirements since the early phases of seedling development
are critical to successful establishment of grassland
species and since germination and emergence are important parameters that determine the potential population of individual species in restored environment
(Lonati et al., 2009). More precisely, this research studied the genetic and environmental factors affecting
germination of seed of Brachypodium genuense and
B. rupestre, with particular attention to their technical
repercussions.
Brachypodium genuense and B. rupestre are two different species of the same genus occurring in central
Apennines. Both have features of dominant species
characterizing by large dimensions, strong capacity of
vegetative reproduction, growth from basal meristems
and high phytomass production (Lucchese, 1987;
Camiz et al., 1991). Because of these features, these
species spread and start to increase their dominance in
the abandoned conditions until becoming invasive and
altering the ecological status of the site (Bonanomi &
Allegrezza, 2004; Bonanomi et al., 2006, 2009; Catorci et al., 2011b).
Nevertheless, they show a quite different ecology regarding particularly soil preference and distribution
along the altitudinal gradient (Dowgiallo & Lucchese,
1991). Brachypodium rupestre is a pioneer species,
growing on poor basic soils mostly deriving from
calcareous rocks, even if it also occurs on clays. Brachypodium genuense occurs at higher altitudes (from
montane to high montane belt) on deep and rich soils
deriving from sandstones but having an acid-subacid
reaction (pH from 4.5 to 7.0).
As regards the morphological and histologic differences, the two species belong to different life forms: B.
Fig. 1 - Range of distribution of Brachypodium rupestre (---)
and B. genuense (....) in Italy. From Dowgiallo and Lucchese
(1991) redrawn.
rupestre is a rhizomatous hemicryptophyte while B.
genuense is a caespitose hemycriptophyte. Furthermore, there are differences in the leaves shape and anatomy and in the morphology of spikelets (Lucchese,
1988).
The Italian distribution of the two species mostly overlaps; B. rupestre having a wider range of distribution
that contains the distribution range of B. genuense focused in the Apennine chain (ig. 1).
Materials and methods
Seed collection
The germination behavior of four populations of Brachypodium rupestre and of a population of B. genuense was studied. Mature seeds were collected from wild
Tab 1 - Collection sites with GPS coordinates of each population studied.
SPECIES
POPULATION
Brachypodium genuense
1
1
Brachypodium rupestre
2
3
4
SITE OF COLLECTION
ALTITUDE
WGS84
LOCALITY
(masl)
Gran Sasso e Monti della
42.393007° 13.563239°
1582
Laga N. Park - Campo
Imperatore (AQ)
Sasso Simone e Simoncello
43.758307° 12.350129°
733
Park -Pian dei Prati (PU)
Gran Sasso e Monti della
42.807141° 13.573715°
1042
Laga N. Park -San Giacomo
(TE)
Gran Sasso e Monti della
42.497711° 13.555683°
1472
Laga N. Park - Prati di Tivo
(TE)
41.565544° 14.393311°
Macchiagodena (IS) 2
947
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas
Fig. 2 - Map of collection sites of B. genuense (Bg) and
B. rupestre (1, 2, 3 and 4).
populations during summer 2010 (B. rupestre) and
summer 2011 (B. genuense) following international
protocols (ISTA 2004, 2006; Bacchetta et al., 2006).
Following harvest, seeds were cleaned by gently grinding the spikelets on a rubber mat and samples processed to remove empty and poorly developed seeds with
a blower (Agriculex CB1 Column Seed Cleaner, T.A.
Baxall and Co., Ltd). Afterwards, they were dried and
stored in a dry room at 15°C and 15% relative humidity for 3 to 6 months before being used for germination
testing and morphological analysis.
Seeds were collected in different areas of Central
Apennines (Fig.2; Tab.1,). Climatic data for each site
of collection were obtained from World Clim database
(Hijmans et al., 2005; not reported here).
Morphological analysis
Length, width and thickness of twenty caryopses (palea and lemma removed) for each seed lot were measured with calipers and a Nikon C-PS SMZ645 stereoscope, itted with a C-W10X/22 micrometer (Southern
Microscopes, Maidstone, UK). Four samples of ten
seeds of each seed lot were weighed on a seven-place
balance (Mettler Toledo UMT2, Beaumont Leys, UK)
with a precision of 0.1 µg. X-ray analysis were carried out on a sample of 50 seeds for each population
to detect empty, poorly developed or damaged seeds.
A Faxitron digital X-ray machine (Qados, Sandhurst,
UK) set at the standard Millennium Seed Bank settings
for seed X-ray radiography (22kV and 0.3 mA for 20 s)
was used. Samples were randomly selected.
Germination tests
Seeds were sown on 1% distilled water agar held in
9 cm diameter transparent polyethylene Petri dishes.
Germination response was tested in programmableenvironmental chambers with controlled temperature
and illumination. Germination response to temperature was evaluated at 7 constant temperatures ranging
between 5 and 35°C. Illumination was provided for 12
hours each day by 30 W cool white luorescent lights.
93
For dark treatments (at 20°C only), Petri dishes were
wrapped in two layers of aluminum foil.
Seeds of a population of B. rupestre were tested with
their covering structures (palea and lemma) intact and
with these structures removed.
Four replicates of 25 seeds each were used in each
germination test. The seeds were monitored daily
until germination ceased, then they were monitored
progressively less frequently, for at least 30 days after
sowing. Germinated seeds were removed when radicle
was at least 1 mm long (Bacchetta et al., 2006). For
tests in the darkness of B. rupestre population1 and of
B. genuense, germination was scored with the same
frequency of tests in the light in a dark room under a
dim safe, green light comprising three 15-20 W cool
white luorescent tubes covered by three layers of no.
39 (primary green) Cinemoid as described in Probert
and Smith (1986). The seeds of the other three populations of B. rupestre tested in the darkness were scored
just at the end of the tests, after 30 days from sowing.
Germination tests were considered inished when no
additional seeds germinated over a period of at least
15 days.
At the end of each germination test, seeds which had
not germinated were dissected (cut-test) to determine
whether they were viable (fresh), non-viable (mouldy)
or empty.
Data analysis
Seed volume was calculated with the following equation:
VOL= πLWT/6
where VOL is seed volume, L is length,W is width
and T is thickness. (Casco & Dias, 2008).
Seed volume and weight mean ± standard deviation
were calculated for each population.
As seed volume and weight data did not show homogeneity of variance, a non-parametric test was used
to tests for signiicant differences in seed volume and
weight between populations of the same species at the
5% level. A Mann-Whitney U test was used when there
were only two populations to compare, a Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA was used for the other species.
All analyses were carried out using GenStat release
15.1 (VSN International Ltd., UK).
The FITNONLINEAR directive with a probit link
function and binomial error distribution was used to
it the equation,
g=Φ(β0−β1(p(T−Tbase))−1)
to the germination progress data (period from
sowing, cumulative number of seeds germinated) at
sub-optimal temperatures. In this equation, g is germi-
94
Galiè et al.
Tab. 2 - Mean and standard deviation values for length (n=20), width (n=20), thickness (n=20), volume (n=20) and weight (n=4x10)
of seeds of the population of B. genuense and four of B. rupestre.
Mean STDV Mean STDV
Mean
STDV
Mean
STDV Mean STDV
POPULATION Length Length Width Width Thickness Thickness Volume Volume Weight Weight
SPECIES
Brachypodium genuense
(mm)
6.340
6.360
6.382
6.243
6.692
1
1
2
3
4
Brachypodium rupestre
(mm)
0.5368
0.6898
0.5424
0.5658
0.4159
(mm)
1.402
1.232
1.365
1.430
1.388
nation (proportion of seeds sown), Φ is the cumulative
normal distribution function, β0 is the maximum germination in probits and β1, the thermaltime constant
(θT), describes the rate of reduction in probit germination as the reciprocal of thermaltime above Tbase (base
temperature) increases. In this analysis, the parameters
β0, β1 and Tbase were estimated concurrently. The suboptimal temperature range was taken as 5°C up to and
including the temperature where maximum % germination was observed.
The FITNONLINEAR directive was also used to it
split-line regression models to the germination rate
data pg−1 for proportion of sown seeds that germinated, g = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, versus
temperature. Independent split-line regressions for g
= 0.1, 0.2, .., 0.9 were itted to identify the values of
g for which data could be included (i.e. where there
was suficient data either side of a Topt). The Tbase and
ceiling temperature, Tceiling are the temperatures where
pg−1 = 0 for the sub- and supra-optimal temperature ranges, respectively; the optimum temperature, Topt is the
break-point of the split-line regression. The pg−1 data
were calculated from the raw cumulative germination
data as the inverse of the period of time from sowing
needed to reach a proportion of germinated seeds, g.
Where split-line regression analysis was not possible for a seed lot, Tbase was estimated through linear
regression analysis of pg−1 versus temperature, for the
sub-optimal range.
Mean germination percentage and mean germination
time (MGT) were calculated for tests in the light and
SPECIES
Brachypodium genuense
Brachypodium rupestre
POPULATION
Tab. 3 - Final germination percentages at temperatures
between 5 and 35°C for seeds from a population of B. genuense and four populations of B. rupestre.
1
1
2
3
4
FINAL GERMINATION (%)
5°C 10°C 15°C 20°C 25°C 30°C 35°C
14
31
40
23
43
25
55
91
80
68
47
87
88
90
74
69
99
98
83
60
87
94
95
72
52
86
80
89
54
43
22
13
49
12
18
(mm)
0.1649
0.1287
0.1233
0.1354
0.1379
(mm)
0.856
0.641
0.675
0.634
0.654
(mm)
0.1142
0.0777
0.0815
0.0832
0.1132
(mm3)
4.035
2.671
3.066
2.971
3.167
(mm3)
1.566
0.6891
0.4361
0.6013
0.5828
(mg)
4.161
4.036
3.664
3.681
3.823
(mg)
0.2079
0.2264
0.1581
0.2342
0.1443
in the dark and for tests on seeds with or without their
covering structures. Mean germination time (MGT)
was calculated according to the equation of Ellis and
Roberts (1980):
MGT=(n d)/N
where n is the number of seeds which germinate on
day d, and N is the total number of seeds germinated
at the end of the test. A logistic regression analysis was
used to ind signiicant differences on germination response to light and to the removal of outer covering
structures.
All analyses were carried out using GenStat release
15.1 (VSN International Ltd., UK).
Results and discussion
Morphological analysis
As regards B. rupestre, seeds from population 1 had
the lowest mean volume but the highest mean weight
(Tab. 2). However, no statistical difference was found
in mean seed volume with Kruskal-Wallis one-way
ANOVA (P = 0.077), while the test could not be performed on mean seed weight values. B. genuense
seeds were found to have higher volume and weight
compared to B. rupestre seeds. No empty or poorly
developed seeds were detected in the samples which
were x-ray analysed.
Germination tests
Brachypodium genuense seeds germinated to between 14% (at 5°C) and 87% (at 25°C) (Tab. 3). Final
germination values obtained at 25 and 30°C were considerably higher than those obtained at the other temperatures tested. The seeds showed a large delay in the
start of germination at 5°C, indeed germination started
54 days after sowing (Fig. 3). The speed of germination increased with temperature between 5 and 25°C,
with the exception of T10, and decreased between 25
and 35°C (Fig. 4). Fitting a thermal time model to the
data for sub-optimal temperatures, the estimated Tbase
was 8.5 ± s.e. 0.33°C (Fig. 3). However, this model did
not seem to it the data of this species properly. This is
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas
Fig. 3 - Results of itting the thermal time model to cumulative germination percentage at sub-optimal temperatures for
seeds from a population of B. genuense and four populations
of B. rupestre tested at temperatures between 5 and 35°C.
probably due to the large differences in inal germination obtained at suboptimal temperatures. Independent split line regression of the pg−1 data was possible
for subpopulations between 10 and 60%. Tbase values
95
calculated with split line regression were between
5.3°C (10% subpopulation) and 16.0°C (60% subpopulation), Topt values between 23.5°C (10% subpopulation) and 17.7°C (20% subpopulation) and Tceiling values between 36.2°C (40% subpopulation) and 40.6°C
(60% subpopulation).
As regards B. rupestre, the seeds of the four populations displayed different germination patterns at the
different temperatures tested. Germination was quite
high for seeds from population 1, 2 and 3, with maximum germination of 99 and 98% (at 20°C) for population 1 and 2 respectively and 90% (at 15°C) for population 3 (Tab. 3). Germination was lower for seeds
from population 4 with maximum germination of 74%
at 15°C. Germination increased between 5 and 20°C
and decreased between 20 and 35°C in seeds from populations 1 and 2. It increased between 5 and 15°C
and decreased between 15 and 35°C in seeds from
populations 3 and 4. Seeds from all the populations
tested showed a delay in the start of germination at
5°C; germination started after 30, 7, 16 or 9 days for
seeds from population 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (Fig.
3). The speed of germination responded differently to
temperature in the seeds of the populations studied and
sometimes also in subpopulations of data (Fig. 4).
96
Galiè et al.
SPECIES
Brachypodium genuense
Brachypodium rupestre
POPULATION
Tab. 4 - Cardinal temperatures values estimated with SplitLine Regression Model from data of the 50% subpopulation
and Tbase estimated with Fitnonlinear Model for seeds from
a population of B. genuense and four populations of B. rupestre.
1
1
2
3
4
SPLIT LINE
FITNONLINEAR
REGRESSION MODEL
MODEL
T
(°C)
15.9
9.4
5.6
N/A
N/A
T
T
(°C)
(°C)
26.9
36.4
23.9
47.3
17.6
35.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
T
(°C)
8.5
9.7
3.4
3.7
3.2
SPECIES
POPULATION
Tab 5 - Mean germination percentage, MGT and P value calculated with Logistic Regression for tests in light and dark
at 20°C in seeds from a population of B. genuense and four
populations of B. rupestre.
Brachypodium genuense
1
1
Brachypodium rupestre
2
3
4
ILLUMIN. GERMINAT
REGIME
ION
light
dark
light
dark
light
dark
light
dark
light
dark
(%)
68.4
31.2
99.0
90.9
98.0
64.0
83.0
63.0
60.0
73.9
P
<0.001
0.006
MGT
(days)
23.75
26.15
5.06
5.45
<0.001
0.001
0.040
Fitting a thermal time model to the data for sub-optimal temperatures, the estimated Tbase was very similar
in seeds from populations 2, 3 and 4 (3.5 ± s.e. 0.12°C,
3.8 ± s.e. 0.08°C and 3.2 ± s.e. 0.13°C, respectively) and considerably higher in seeds from population
1 (9.7 ± s.e. 0.18°C). The speed of germination was
maximum at 25°C in seeds from population 1 and
2, at 30°C in seeds from population 4 and it varied
differently according to the subpopulations of data in
population 3. It was not possible to perform a splitline regression on population 4 data, since the speed of
germination was maximum at 30°C and germination
drastically decreased at 35°C, so that the only datum
available at this temperature was the T10. As well, the
model did not it the data of all the subpopulations
and, in the cases of seeds from populations 1 and 3, the
model failed to estimate the Tceiling value or provided
unrealistic estimates. The estimated Tbase was between
4.1°C (20% subpopulation) and 9.8°C (80% subpopulation) for seeds from population 1, between 2.9°C
(10% subpopulation) and 5.4°C (40% subpopulation)
for population 2, between 3.8°C (20% subpopulation)
and 5.1°C (60% subpopulation) for population 3 and
between 1.9°C (30% subpopulation) and 3.3°C (40%
subpopulation) for population 4. The estimated Topt
was between 23.9°C (50% subpopulation) and 29.5°C
(10% subpopulation) for seeds from population 1,
between 26.3°C (10% subpopulation) and 28.9°C
(40% subpopulation) for population 2, between 16.2°C
(20% subpopulation) and 18.23°C (60% subpopulation) for population 3 while it was not possible to estimate this value for seeds from population 4. The estimated Tceiling (excluding not realistic data) was between
31.4°C (80% subpopulation) and 42.2°C (60% subpopulation) for seeds from population 1, between 36.9°C
(40% subpopulation) and 40.8°C (10% subpopulation)
for population 2 and between 29.4°C (70 and 80%
subpopulations) and 39.2°C (40% subpopulation) for
population 3. As regards the inluence of light on germination, logistic regression showed that light clearly
increased germination in seeds of Brachypodium genuense (P < 0.001), whereas darkness increased the
speed of germination (Tab. 5). Similarly, light clearly
increased germination in seeds from populations 1, 2
and 3 of B. rupestre, whereas it decreased germination
in seeds from population 4. Logistic regression analysis showed that all the differences were signiicant.
Germination was slightly slower in the darkness.
The effect of outer covering structures (palea and
lemma) was investigated only on seeds from population 1 of B. rupestre and the removal of such structures
was found to be of no effect. Indeed, seeds germinated
equally well either intact and with palea and lemma
removed (Tab. 6). Naked seeds just had a higher speed
of germination.
Discussion
Seed Size and Weight and their relationship with germination performance
The morphological analyses conducted on Brachypodium rupestre could not detect any differences in seed
size in the four populations studied (Tab. 2). Conversely, there seems to be quite a clear difference in seed
weight values, at least among seeds from population
1 and the others. No clear relationship between seed
weight and volume were found in this species, indeed, seeds from population 1 showed the highest weight
and the lowest volume.
Seed weight values were compared with other published values of air-dry seeds of the same species:
2.57 mg (Cerabolini et al., 2003) for B. rupestre and
1.95 mg for B. rupestre ssp. caespitosum (Piccinin et
al., 2004). Both values are lower than the values of
seeds from the four populations studied (between 3.68
and 4.04 mg). However, seed weight and volume did
not seem to affect germination performance in this
species, neither in terms of mean germination, nor in
terms of maximum germination.
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas
Fig. 4 - Split-line regression model pg−1 for seeds from a population of B. genuense and four populations of B. rupestre
at temperatures between 5 and 35°C.
97
These indings are very interesting since seed size is
frequently considered one of the least variable plant
characteristics and the least plastic component of fecundity, in comparison with plant size and seed allocation (Harper et al., 1970). This apparent constancy
results in part from the tendency to determine the mean
seed weight of large numbers of seeds, rather than the
distribution of individual seed weights (Fenner, 1985).
Conversely, volume was calculated on single seeds
and weight on samples of ten seeds each in the present study. This approach was certainly more suitable
to detect differences between seedlots and therefore to
evidence differences between different populations. A
few studies have shown that there are frequently considerable variations in seed size (Bretagnolle et al.,
1995; Zhang, 1998), even within individual plants.
The present research did not investigate the causes of
such differences, so it is not possible to establish whether they are due to genetic factors or not. Although in
this research seed weight and volume values and climatic data of collection sites (not reported here) have
98
Galiè et al.
SPECIES
Brachypodium rupestre
POPULATION
Tab. 6 - Mean germination percentage, MGT and P value calculated with Logistic Regression for tests on intact and with palea and
lemma removed seeds from population 1 of Brachypodium rupestre at 20°C.
1
Germination
Seeds
(%)
with palea and lemma removed
intact
been studied for each population, it is not possible to
establish whether a relationship exists between such
data. That is because the amount of populations studied for each species is too low for this purpose.
Moreover, it has been demonstrated that variations
not only pertain to seed size but also colors and shape
of seeds (Baskin & Baskin, 1998). Such variations are
due to both genetic and environmental factors during
the time of seed development. Among the environmental factors producing the previously mentioned
variations, there is mineral nutrition; precisely, high
levels of nitrogen (Gibson & Humphreys, 1973), phosphorus (Lewis & Koide, 1990), potassium (Willson
& Price, 1980; Parrish & Bazzaz, 1985) or mixed mineral nutrients (van Andel & Vera, 1977) in the soil
increase seed size in some species. Other factors found
to affect seed size, either increasing or decreasing it,
are: soil moisture (Schimpf, 1977; Brocklehurst et al.,
1978; Withers & Forde, 1979; Chadoeuf-Hannel &
Barralis, 1982; Meckel et al., 1984; Ramseur et al.,
1984; Stamp, 1990 Stromberg and Patten, 1990), solar irradiance and day length (Williams, 1960; Williams & Harper, 1965; Cook, 1975; Brocklehurst et
al., 1978; Jenner, 1979; Martinez-Carrasco & Thorne,
1979; Willson & Price, 1980; Agren, 1989; Schmitt
et al., 1992; Sultan, 1996), temperature (Lambert &
Linck, 1958; Stearns, 1960; Maun et al., 1969; Wardlaw, 1970; Bean, 1971; Datta et al., 1972; Skerman &
Humphreys, 1973; Ford et al., 1976; Akpan & Bean,
1977; Egli & Wardlaw, 1980; Wood et al., 1980; Campbell et al., 1981; Alexander & Wulff, 1985; Mohamed
et al., 1985; Wulff, 1986; Drew & Blocklehurst, 1990;
Lacey, 1996), the timing in which seeds are produced
during the growing season (Soffer & Smith, 1974;
Raju & Ramaswamy, 1983; Cavers & Steel, 1984;
Thompson & Pellmyr, 1989; Kane & Cavers, 1992)
and the position; indeed, seeds produced in different
parts of the same inlorescence may differ in weight
(McGinley, 1989); this evidence has been found in a
few grasses (Whalley et al., 1966; Lambert, 1967; Datta et. al, 1970).
It was important to study the variation of seed size
among different populations of the same species since
it is considered as an important trait determining the
successful establishment of individual plants (Westoby
et al., 1992; Vaughton & Ramsey, 1997; 1998; Zhang,
1998). Indeed, seed mass represents the amount of
100.0
99.0
P
MGT
days
3.36
0.236 5.060.417
maternal investment for individual offspring. Generally, seed weight variation is associated with itness
and population establishment since seed traits are critical elements in the life history of plants. In agronomic species, seed weight is correlated with seed vigor,
plant growth, and even yield (Lafond & Baker, 1986;
Berdahl & Frank, 1998; Boe, 2003). Seed weight has
been found to have a positive effect on germination
percentage in a large number of species, either in laboratory (Thompson, 1990; Bretagnolle, 1995) or in ield
conditions (Roach, 1987; Winn, 1988).
In wild plants, large seed size is correlated with a higher seedling recruitment (Negri & Falcinelli, 1990;
Mendez, 1997; Susko & Lovett-Doust, 2000; Dalling
& Hubbell, 2002; Debain et al., 2003), bigger seedlings (Hou & Romo, 1998) and greater probability of
survival (Simons & Johnston, 2000; Walters & Reich,
2000). Ecologically, seedlings emerging from large seeds often survive longer than those from small seeds
under adverse seedbed conditions, such as low light
(Simons & Johnston, 2000), low water (Hendrix &
Trapp, 1992; Chacon & Bustamante, 2001), nutrient limitations (Vaughton & Ramsey, 1998) and deep burial
depth (Yanful & Maun, 1996; Ruiz-de-Clavijo, 2002).
Germination requirements and behavior
TEMPERATURE
Brachypodium genuense seeds germinated best at
high temperatures (25-30°C). Moreover, since the
maximum germination percentage was only 87%,
perhaps some seeds were still dormant when germination tests were conducted. A remarkable number of seeds failed to germinate at temperatures between 5 and
20°C. Moreover, germination started with a very long
delay (54 days) at 5°C. For all these reasons, cardinal temperatures values were considerably high in this
species. These are very meaningful indings, in ecological terms, because this species grows at a higher
altitude, compared to the other studied here, and thus
experiences the lowest temperatures (mean, minimum
and maximum annual temperatures). Seeds germination behavior appears to be strongly inluenced by the
environment, as it was reported for species other than
Poaceae (Sawhney & Naylor, 1979; Probert et al.,
1985a; Simpson, 1990). Such behavior could relect a
survival strategy aimed to avoid early germination in
a period where extreme cold events are likely to occur
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas
(Derkx, 2000). For all this reasons and since the level
of innate dormancy in seeds usually declines during
dry storage (Probert, 1992), it would have been particularly interesting to study germination of freshlyharvested seeds in this species, in order to establish
whether they have dormancy or not, how deep it is
and how to break it. In fact, physiological dormancy is
quite common in Poaceae (Simpson, 1990; Baskin &
Baskin, 1998). Furthermore, different Brachypodium
genotypes display dormancy (Barrero et al., 2012) and
a physiological dormancy has been found in seeds of
B. sylvaticum (Grime et al., 1981) and B. distachyon
(Barrero et al., 2012).
As regards B. rupestre, germination performance varied quite noticeably among the different populations
tested (Tab. 3). The highest mean germination was
found in seeds from population 2 while the highest
maximum germination in seeds from population 1.
The lowest germination was observed in seeds from
population 4.
The germination rate varied among the populations
within the same temperature and in some cases also for
subpopulations data within the same population (Fig.
4). Similarly, the delay in the start of germination at
5°C was very different among populations (7-30 days)
(Fig. 3).
Conversely, Tbase values estimated with the thermal
time model were very similar in seeds from populations 2, 3 and 4 (3.5, 3.7 and 3.2°C, respectively). Independent split-line model does not seem to properly
it the data. The only data available for the 50% subpopulation refer to seeds from populations 1 and 2. The
difference between these parameters and the parameters estimated using the thermal time model were 0.32
and 1.84°C for population 1 and 2, respectively, thus
the estimates obtained with the two models were quite
similar.
It is interesting to note that seeds from population 3,
whose site of collection has a far higher altitude and
consequently the lowest temperatures (mean, minimum and maximum annual temperature) (Tab.1), had
the lowest cardinal temperatures, estimated with the
split-line regression on the 50% subpopulation data.
It is interesting to note that two populations of B. rupestre reached the highest germination at 20°C and the
other two at 15°C. Tbase values estimated with Fitnonlinear Model were very similar in three out four populations of B. rupestre. Tbase values estimated with both
models were considerably different in B. genuense.
It was of paramount importance to study germination
response to temperature since it is the single most important factor regulating germination of non-dormant
seeds in irrigated, annual agroecosystem at the beginning of the growth season where light, nutrients and
moisture are typically not growth limiting (GarciaHuidobro et al., 1982). It has a direct control on the
99
rate of many chemical reactions, including respiration and photosynthesis (Munir et al., 2004). Roberts
(1988) recognized three separate physiological processes in seeds affected by temperature: irst, temperature, together with moisture content, determines the
rate of deterioration in all seeds; secondly, temperature
affects the rate of dormancy loss in dry seeds and the
pattern of dormancy change in moist seeds; and, thirdly, in non-dormant seeds temperature determines the
rate of germination. Although a relationship between
cardinal temperatures for each population studied and
the climate of their own collection sites was not found,
probably due to the low amount of data, further studies should be needed to verify this hypothesis that has
been demonstrated for other species. Indeed, Probert
(2000) and Baskin & Baskin (2001) found that germination response to temperature is related to ecological
and geographical distribution of species and ecotypes,
because germination is a critical stage of the life cycle
relecting adaptation to local habitats (Gutterman,
2000; Probert, 2000).
Based on studies with nematodes, Trudgill & Perry
(1994) suggested that the temperature responses of
poikilothermic species relected the environments to
which they were adapted and that differences between species have considerable ecological signiicance.
It has been demonstrated that seeds of many grasses
found in habitats characterized by summer drought,
like the grasses of this study, are capable of germination under a wide range of temperatures, although
timing of germination is determined by the amount of
moisture (Thompson & Grime, 1979).
The results of germination tests suggest that seeds of
the grasses studied probably start germinating during
autumn when temperatures are above the estimated
Tbase values and soil moisture is not limiting. Germination of these species continues through the winter
until cold soil limits germination; germination begins
again in spring when soil temperatures warm and soil
moisture remains not limiting. For all these reasons,
sowing should be done in autumn or spring, before soil
moisture become limiting, in restoration works.
B. rupestre seeds germinated to high percentages in
a rather wide range of temperatures while B. genuense seeds in a rather narrow. Baskin & Baskin (1998)
demonstrated that as seeds come out of primary dormancy, they germinate only over a narrow range of
conditions, known as conditional dormancy. During
the progression of dormancy loss, however, this range widens until seeds inally germinate over the full
range of conditions possible for the population or taxon, at which point they are not dormant. Therefore,
the accession of B. rupestre studied in this research
were completely non-dormant at the moment when
tests were set up, whereas B. genuense seeds were
probably not. However, it is not possible to establish
100 Galiè et al.
whether the seeds studied were dormant or not when
fresh. That is because it is not possible to exclude that
dry storage, and therefore after-ripening, made the seeds come out of dormancy. Indeed, after-ripening is a
common method used to release dormancy (Grime et
al., 1981; Hilton, 1984; Probert et al., 1985b; Bewley,
1997; Probert, 2000; Leubner-Metzger, 2003; Kucera
et al., 2005; Bair et al., 2006).
In any case, the purpose of the research was to test
germination in stored seeds and, therefore, it is possible to state that air-dry seeds from central Apennines
germinate to high percentages in a rather wide range
of temperatures.
Some authors (Ratcliff, 1961; Newman, 1963) hypothesized that after-ripening is a mechanism preventing
premature germination in dry habitats. The same explanation may be applied to the characteristic, although not very pronounced, response to dry storage evident in certain autumn-germinating perennial grasses
such as Festuca ovina, Koeleria cristata and Poa compressa (Grime, 1981). The possibility must be considered, therefore, that in certain species a major effect of
delayed ripening and germination is to facilitate seed
burial.
In conclusion, it is important to emphasize the fact
that seeds were after-ripened before being tested for
germination. Therefore, the indings of this study describe the germination behavior of air-dry seeds of the
grasses studied. Such behavior could be substantially
different in fresh seeds.
LIGHT
Light was found to signiicantly enhance germination
in B. genuense and in three populations of B. rupestre
(Tab. 5).
Nondormant seeds of many species germinate equally well in light and darkness (Baskin & Baskin, 1988),
those of others germinate to higher percentages in light
than in darkness (Grime et al., 1981; Probert 1985a;
Baskin & Baskin, 1988), and those of a relatively few
germinate to higher percentages in darkness than in
light (Hammouda & Bakr, 1969; Hilton, 1982; Thanos et al., 1992). In this study germination response
to light was tested only at 20°C and always using the
same kind and intensity of radiation. For this reason
it is not possible to verify the effect of other factors
which were found to modify the germination response
to light, such as temperature (Thompson et al., 1977;
Bewley & Black, 1982; Probert et al., 1985c), the spectrum of light applied (Kendrick, 1976; Ginzo, 1978;
Bewley and Black, 1982; Hilton, 1982, 1984; Probert
et al., 1985a), the doses of photons (Thompson, 1989),
and the photoperiod applied (Evenari, 1965).
Light is an extremely important factor in releasing
seed from dormancy (Bewley and Black, 1994), although there is an underlying dark dormancy in many
species which disappears with time. Therefore, the
fact that B. genuense seeds studied showed a so deep
light requirement for germination could supports the
hypothesis that seeds possibly had not completely lost
dormancy at the time when germination tests were set
up. In addition, light was found to have a major role in
breaking seed dormancy in the majority of grass species (Simpson, 1990). For all these reasons, in order to
establish whether a species requires light to germinate
or not, seeds need to be tested in light and darkness
when they are freshly matured and at regular intervals during the dormancy-breaking period, because
their light requirement may change as they come out
of dormancy (Baskin & Baskin, 1998). In any case,
germination response to light and its effect on the release of dormancy are very variable. Grime (1981)
found that in many species the difference applies to
freshly matured seeds within the same seed collection,
and it is known that seeds removed from the same inlorescence may exhibit marked differences in light
requirement (Cavers & Harper 1966). Obviously, it
would have been very interesting to test germination
of freshly-collected seeds but, since the major purpose
of this research was testing the suitability of autochthonous germplasm to multiplication and usage for environmental restoration, it was important to test seeds
reproducing the conditions in which they will possibly
be used in restoration projects. The theoretical indings
of this study suggest that in the case of a large scale
production of these seeds, sowing depth, which is related to the light requirements of seeds, could be controlled by the use of multiplication parcels to select the
optimum burial depth for different seed populations of
different species and consequently it could be reduced
in seeds showing a light requirement for germination.
This could maximize seed germination and therefore
seed production.
OUTER COVERING STRUCTURES
The removal of outer covering structures did not increase inal germination in B. rupestre seeds, it just
increased the speed of germination (Tab. 6). Conversely, previous studies demonstrated that the presence
of palea and lemma usually reduces the germination in
seeds of grasses (Roberts, 1961; Hagon, 1976; Mott,
1974; Martin, 1975; Probert et al., 1985d). Indeed,
they mechanically restrict germination, reduce oxygen
transport to the embryo (Delouche, 1956; Vose, 1956;
Roberts, 1962; Stokes, 1965; Mott 1974), reduce imbibition or prevent the leaching of an inhibitor (Hagon,
1976). It has been found that the removal of the glumes
and/or palea and lemma, as well as selective surgical
treatments applied to otherwise intact seeds, reduced
the level of dormancy in seeds of grasses and cereals (Roberts, 1961; Hagon, 1976; Mott, 1974; Martin,
1975; Probert et al., 1985d). Probert et al. (1985d)
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas
found that coat removal increased both rate and inal
percentage germination in Dactylis glomerata. Other
studies demonstrated that palea and lemma reduce germination through different mechanisms, restricting the
uptake of oxygen by the embryo (Mott, 1974), limiting gas exchange (Frank & Larson, 1970), acting as
a mechanical barrier to the expanding embryo (Frank
& Larson, 1970), releasing inhibitory substances (Hagon, 1976).
The evidence that B. rupestre seeds do not require the
removal of outer covering structures has to be considered as an advantage for the purpose of this research.
Indeed, this has positive consequences on restoration
works. Indeed, if seeds of a species are found to not require this treatment, the extraction of seeds from palea
and lemma will be not necessary and, thus, all the cleaning process will be quicker and, consequently, less
expensive. Furthermore, removing the covering structures could also increase the risk of infection in seeds
sown in the soil, especially if germination is delayed
by low temperatures.
Conclusions
Germination was not problematic for studied seeds,
since they were able to germinate to high percentages
in a rather wide range of temperature. B. rupestre seeds did not require the removal of palea and lemma
and it could allow to use a faster and less expensive
extraction process.
As regards the light requirement for germination
found in both species studied, it suggests that it will be
important to not exceed in sowing depth.
So, it can be stated that seeds of the autochthonous
populations studied can be easily multiplied and successfully used for marginal areas improvement, protecting the genetic purity of local populations. This aspect
is very important for the conservation of habitats (Directive 92/43/EEC) and their restoration in Natura
2000 Network sites (Biondi et al., 2012 and 2012a).
Indeed, considering the Brachypodium rupestre and
B. genuense ability to stop or reduce the evolution of
grassland dynamic processes, they can be used in the
recovery of particular habitats such as road embankments or hilly slops affected by erosion risks in order
to maintain the stability in spatial and temporary terms
and thus, reducing their management by men.
Moreover, the theoretical indings of this research
will be really helpful to establish the best technical
protocols for seed extraction, multiplication and seeding of studied species.
In this way, it could be possible to deine germination protocols of herbaceous non food plants that could
be used in the development of alternative agricultural
activities and in the management of the environment.
Such activities could represent new development per-
101
spective of mountain and hill areas. This would respond to the aims of important International conventions, such as The Convention on Biological Diversity
(CBD), and to the Sustainable Development logic.
The reformed Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
has a “greener” and more equally subdivided irst pillar and a second pillar more centred on competitiveness and innovation, climate change and environment.
At national level, the National Strategic Plan for Rural
Development 2007-2013 has been notiied in 2009 and
reformed on the basis of the European Plan for the economic relaunch which aims to: improve the competitiveness of agriculture and forest sectors; improve the
environment and the countryside; improve the quality
of life in rural areas and diversify rural economy. In
particular, the II Axis, concerning the improvement of
the environment and the countryside, considers: agrienvironmental payments, Natura 2000 subsidies (to
compensate costs and income losses due to the restrictions in the use of wood and forest imposed by 79/409/
EEC and 92/43/EEC); non productive investments
(investments that valorize protected areas in terms
of public utility). Another important aspect concerns
the support to agriculture through the Rural Development Plan (RDP) proposals for 2014-2020 in High
Nature Value farmlands. In this context, semi-natural
grasslands produced by anthropic activity play a very
important role (Galdenzi et al., 2011 and 2012). All
these practices will be crucial through RDP payments
not only for the respect of good agricultural practices
but above all for the conservation and the recovery of
biodiversity and of the most typical landscapes. The
authors believe that inancing the recovery of autochthonous germplasm must be considered in these plans
and that the diffusion of non native species and varieties must be stopped. Indeed, they led to the genetic
erosion of biodiversity. For this reason, a commerce of
seeds of autochthonous non food herbaceous species it
should be supported, at least within the EU.
Acknowledgements
Dr. Robin Probert and Dr. Rose Mary Newton (Millennium Seed Bank) for their kind help, and Dr. Fiona
Hay for help in statistics and models.
References
Agren J., 1989. Seed Size and Number in Rubus
chamaemorus: Between-Habitat Variation, and Effects of Defoliation and Supplemental Pollination.
Journal of Ecology 77 (4): 1080-1092.
Akpan E.E.J. & Bean E.W., 1977. The Effects of Temperature upon Seed Development in Three Species
of Forage Grasses. Annals of Botany 41 (4): 689695.
102 Galiè et al.
Alexander H.M. & Wulff R.D., 1985. Experimental
Ecological Genetics in Plantago: X. The Effects of
Maternal Temperature on Seed and Seedling Characters in P. lanceolata Journal of Ecology 73 (1):
271-282.
Andersen E., Baldock D., Bennett H., Beaufoy G., Bignal E., Brouwer F., Elbersen B., Eiden G., Godeschalk F., Jones G., McCracken D., Nieuwenhuizen
W., Eupen van M. Hennekens S. & Zervas G., 2003.
Developing a high nature value farming area indicator. Internal report. EEA, Copenhagen.
Bacchetta G., Fenu G., Mattana E., Piotto B. & Virevaire M. (Eds.) 2006. Manuale per la raccolta, studio, conservazione e gestione ex situ del germoplasma Linee Guida APAT, 37, Roma. 244 pp.
Bair N.B., Meyer S.E. & Allen P.S., 2006. A hydrothermal after-ripening time model for seed dormancy loss in Bromus tectorum L. Seed Science Research 16: 17–28.
Baldoni M., Biondi E. & Ferrante L., 2004. Demographic and spatial analysis of a population of Juniperus oxycedrus L. in an abandoned grasslands. Plant
Biosystems 138 (2): 89-100.
Ballerini V. & Biondi E., 2002. Dinamica di popolazioni arbustive e preforestali nell’Appennino umbro-marchigiano (Italia centrale). Fitosociologia 39
(1) Suppl. 2: 175-183.
Barrero J.M., Jacobsen J.V., Talbot M.J., White R.G.,
Swain S.M., Garvin D.F. & Gubler F., 2012. Grain
dormancy and light quality effects on germination
in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. New
Phytologist 193: 376–386.
Baskin C.C. & Baskin J.M., 1988. Germination Ecophysiology of Herbaceous Plant-Species in A Temperate Region. American Journal of Botany 75: 286305.
Baskin C.C. & Baskin J.M., 1998. Seeds, ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego: Academic Press. 666 pp.
Baskin C.C. & Baskin J.M., 2001. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 666
Bean E.W., 1971. Temperature Effects upon Inlorescence and Seed Development in Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) Annals of Botany 35 (4):
891-897.
Berdahl J.D. & Frank A.B., 1998. Seed maturity in
four cool-season forage grasses. Agronomy Journal
90: 483-488.
Bewley J.D., 1997. Seed germination and dormancy.
Plant Cell 9: 1055–1066.
Bewley J.D. & Black M., 1982. Physiology and Biochemistry of Seeds, in Relation to Germination,
vol.2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Bewley J.D. & Black M., 1994. Seeds: physiology of
development and germination. Plenum Press. New
York, USA, pp. 445.
Bignal E.M. & McCracken D.I., 1996. Low-intensity
farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 413-424.
Biondi E., Baldoni M. & Loiotile A., 2000. Utilizzazione del territorio e successioni diacroniche della
vegetazione in un’area dell’Appennino umbromarchigiano. In: Biondi E., Colantonio R. La pianiicazione del paesaggio tra ri-naturazione ed iperantropizzazione, (Ancona, 27-28 novembre 1997),
Accademia Marchigiana di Scienze Lettere ed Arti:
103-159.
Biondi E., Casavecchia S. & Pesaresi S., 2006. Spontaneous renaturalization processes of the vegetation
in the abandoned ields (Central Italy). Annali di Botanica (Roma), 6: 65-93.
Biondi E., Blasi C., Burrascano S., Casavecchia S.,
Copiz R., Del Vico E., Galdenzi D., Gigante D., Lasen C., Spampinato G., Venanzoni R. & Zivkovic
L., 2009. Manuale Italiano di interpretazione degli
habitat della Direttiva Habitat 92/43/CEE. Società
Botanica Italiana. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della
tutela del territorio e del mare, D.P.N. –(http://vnr.
unipg.it/habitat).
Biondi E., Casaveccia S., Pesaresi S. & Zivkovic L.,
2012 - Natura 2000 and the Pan-European Ecological Network: a new methodology for data integration. Biodivers. Conserv. 21(7):1741-1754.
Biondi E., Burrascano S., Casavecchia S., Copiz R.,
Del Vico E., Galdenzi D., Gigante D., Lasen C.,
Spampinato G., Venanzoni R., Zivkovic L. & Blasi
C. 2012a - Diagnosis and syntaxonomic interpretation of Annex I Habitats (Dir. 92/43/EEC) in Italy at
the alliance level. Plant Sociology, 49 (1): 5-37.
Boe A., 2003. Genetic and environmental effects on
seed weight and seed yield in switchgrass. Crop
Science 43: 63-67.
Bonanomi G. & Allegrezza M., 2004. Effetti della colonizzazione di Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roemer et Schultes sulla diversità di alcune itocenosi
erbacee dell’Appennino centrale. Fitosociologia 41
(2): 51-69.
Bonanomi G., Caporaso S. & Allegrezza M., 2006.
Short-term effects of nitrogen enrichment, litter
removal and cutting on a Mediterranean grassland.
Acta Oecol. 30: 419-425.
Bonanomi G., Caporaso S. & Allegrezza M., 2009. Effects of nitrogen enrichment, plant litter removal and
cutting on a species-rich Mediterranean calcareous
grassland. Plant Biosyst. 143 (3): 443-455.
Bretagnolle F., Thompson J. D. & Lumaret R., 1995.
The inluence of seed size variation on seed germination and seedling vigour in diploid and tetraploid
Dactylis glomerata L. Annals of Botany 76: 607615.
Brocklehurst P.A., Moss J.P. & Williams W., 1978.
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas 103
Effects of irradiance and water supply on grain development in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 90
(2): 265–276.
Camiz S., Dowgiallo G. & Lucchese F., 1991. Edaphic
characters of Brachypodium communities on the
Alps and Apennines. Ecol. Medit. 17: 33-49.
Campbell C.A., Davidson H.R. & Winkleman G.E.,
1981. Effect of nitrogen, temperature, growth stage
and duration of moisture stress on yield components
and protein content of Manitou spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 61: 549-563
Casco H. & Dias L.S., 2008. Estimating seed mass and
volume from linear dimensions from seeds. Seed
Science and Technology 36 (1): 230-236
Catorci A., Antolini E, Tardella F. M. & Scocco P.,
2013. Assessment of interaction between sheep and
poorly palatable grass: a key tool for grassland management and restoration. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2013 DOI:10.1080/17429145.2013.776706
Catorci A., Cesaretti S., Gatti R. & Ottaviani G.,
2011b. Abiotic and biotic changes due to spread of
Brachypodium genuense (DC.) Roem. & Schult. In
sub-Mediterranean meadows. Community Ecology
12 (1): 117-125.
Catorci A., Ottaviani G. & Cesaretti S., 2011a. Functional and coenological changes under different
long-term management conditions in Apennine meadows (central Italy). Phytocoenologia 41: 45-58.
Cavers P.B. & Harper J.L., 1996. Germination polymorphism in Rumex crispus and Rumex obtusifolius.
The Journal of Ecology 54 (2): 367-382.
Cavers P.B. & Steel M.G., 1984. Patterns of change in
seed weight over time on individual plants. American Naturalist 124, 324–335.
Cerabolini B., 1996. Aspetti loristici e itosociologici delle praterie insubriche. Quaderni del parco del
Monte Barro 4: 15-35.
Chacón P. & Bustamante R.O., 2001. The effects of
seed size and pericarp on seedling recruitment and
biomass in Cryptocarya alba (Lauraceae) under two
contrasting moisture regimes. Plant Ecology 152:
137-144.
Chadoeuf-Hannel R. & Barralis G., 1982. Effect of
different water regimes on the vegetative growth,
seed weight and germination in the weed Amaranthus retrolexus L. under greenhouse conditions.
Agronomie 2: 835–841.
Cook R.E., 1975 The Photoinductive Control of
Seed Weight in Chenopodium rubrum L. American
Journal of Botany 62 (4):427-431.
Dalling J.W. & Hubbell S.P., 2002. Seed size, growth
rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of
recruitment success for pioneer species. Journal of
Ecology 90: 557-568.
Datta S.C , Evenari M. & Gutterman Y., 1970. The
heteroblasty of Aegilops ovata L. Israel Journal of
Botany 19: 463-483.
Datta S.C., Gutterman Y. & Evenari M., 1972. The Inluence of the Origin of the Mother Plant on Yield
and Germination of Their Caryopses in Aegilops
ovata. Planta 105: 155-164.
Debain S., Curt T. & Lepart J., 2003. Seed mass, seed
dispersal capacity, and seedling performance in a Pinus sylvestris population. Ecoscience 10: 168-175.
Delouche J.C., 1956. Dormancy in seeds of Agropyron smithii, Digitaria sanguinalis and Poa pratensis.
Iowa State College, Journal of Science 30: 348-349.
Derkx M.P.M., 2000. Pre-treatment at controlled seed
moisture content as an effective means to break dormancy in tree seeds. In: Viémont J.D. and Crabbé J.
Dormancy in Plants: From Whole Plant Behaviour
to Cellular Control. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 69-92.
Dowgiallo M.G., Lucchese F., 1991. Studio dei rapporti tra suolo e distribuzione di due specie di Brachypodium: B. rupestre e B. genuense. Annali della
Facoltà di Agraria, Campobasso vol. II: 67-82.
Drew R.L.K. & Brocklehurst P.A., 1990. Effects of
Temperature of Mother-plant Environment on Yield
and Germination of Seeds of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Annals of Botany 66 (1): 63-71.
Egli D.B. & Wardlaw I.F., 1980. Temperature Response of Seed Growth Characteristics of Soybeans.
Agronomy Journal 72 (3): 560-564.
Ellis R.H. & Roberts E.H., 1980. Towards a rational
basis for testing seed quality. In: Hebblethwaite, P.D.
(Ed.), Seed Production. Butterworths, London, pp.
605–635.
Endresz G., Zöld-Balogh Á. & Kalapos T., 2005. Local distribution pattern of Brachypodium pinnatum
(Poaceae) - ield experiments in xeric loess grassland in N. Hungary. Phyton. 45: 249-265.
Evenari M., 1965. Light and seed dormancy. Encyclopedia of plant physiology 15 (2): 804-847.
Fenner M., 1985. Seed Ecology. Chapman and Hall,
London.
Ford M.A., Pearman I. & Thorne G.N., 1976. Effects
of variation in ear temperature on growth and yield
of spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 82 (2):
317–333.
Frank A.B. & Larson K.L., 1970. Inluence of Oxygen, Sodium Hypochlorite, and Dehulling on Germination of Green Needlegrass Seed (Stipa viridula
Trin.). Crop Science 10 (6): 679-682.
Galdenzi D., Pesaresi S., Colosi L. & Biondi E., 2011.
Methodological aspects for the evaluation of the
quality of agro-ecosystems and landscapes that give
rise. Fitosociologia 48 (2): 65-76.
Galdenzi D., Pesaresi S., Casavecchia S., Zivkovic L.
& Biondi E., 2012. The phytosociological and syndynamical mapping for the identiication of High
Nature Value farmaland. Plant Sociology 49 (2): 59-
104 Galiè et al.
69.
Garcia-Huidobro J., Monteith J.L. & Squire G.R. ,
1982. Time, temperature and germination of pearl
millet (Pennisetum typhoides S & H.). I. Constant
temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany 33:
288–296.
Gibson T.A. & Humphreys L.R., 1973. The inluence
of nitrogen nutrition of Desmodium uncinatum on
seed production. Australian Journal of Agricultural
Research 24(5): 667-676.
Ginzo D.H., 1978. Red and far red inhibition of germination on Aristida murina CAV. [lichens]. Zeitschrift
fuer Planzenphysiologie 90 (4): 303-307
Grime J.P., Mason G., Curtis A.V., Rodman J., Band
S.R., Mowforth M.A.G., Neal A.M. & Shaw S. ,
1981. A Comparative Study of Germination Characteristics in a local lora. Journal of Ecology 69:
1017-1059.
Gutterman Y., 2000. Genotypic and phenotypic germination survival strategies of ecotypes and annual
plant species in the Negev Desert of Israel. In: Black,
M., Bradford, K.J., Vázquez-Ramos, J., (Eds.), Seed
biology: Advances and applications : proceedings of
the sixth International Workshop on Seeds, Mérida,
México, 1999. CABI Pub., Wallingford, Oxon., UK,
New York, pp. 389.
Hagon M.W., 1976. Germination and Dormancy of
Themeda australis, Danthonia spp., Stipa bigeniculata and Bothriochloa macra. Australian Journal of
Botany 24: 319-27.
Hammouda M.A. & Bakr Z.Y., 1969. Some aspects of
germination of desert seeds. Phyton 13: 183-201.
Harper J.L., Lovell P. & Moore K., 1970. The shapes
and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 1: 327-356.
Hendrix S.D. & Trapp E.J., 1992. Population demography of Pastinaca sativa (Apiaceae): effects of
seed mass on emergence, survival, and recruitment.
American Journal of Botany 79 (4): 365-375.
Hijmans R.J., Cameron S.E., Parra J.L., Jones P.G. &
Jarvis A., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated
climate surfaces for global land areas. International
Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978. http://www.
worldclim.org/methods
Hilton J.R., 1982. An unusual effect of the far-red absorbing form of phytochrome: Photoinhibition of
seed germination in Bromus sterilis L. Planta 155
(6): 524-528.
Hilton J.R., 1984. The inluence of light and potassium
nitrate on the dormancy and germination of Avena
fatua L. (wild oat) seed and its ecological signiicance. New Phytologist 96, 31-4.
Hou J.Q. & Romo J.T., 1998. Seed weight and germination time affect growth of 2 shrubs. Journal of
Range Manage 51: 699-703.
Hurst A. & John E., 1999. The biotic and abiotic chan-
ges associated with Brachypodium pinnatum dominance in chalk grassland in south-east England. Biol
Conserv. 88: 75-84.
ISTA - The International Seed Testing Association
2004. International Rules for Seed Testing. Edition
2004. The International Seed Testing Association
(ISTA). Basserdorf, CH-Switzerland.
ISTA - The International Seed Testing Association.
2006. International Rules for Seed Testing, Edition
2006. International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdorf, Switzerland.
Jenner CF., 1979. Grain-Filling in Wheat Plants Shaded for Brief Periods After Anthesis. Australian
Journal of Plant Physiology 6 (6) 629 - 641
Kane M. & Cavers P.B., 1992. Patterns of seed weight
distribution and germination with time in a weedy
biotype of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 562–567
Kendrick R.E. & Spruit C.J.P., 1977. Phototransformations of phytochrome. Photochemistry and photobiology 26 (2): 201-214.
Kucera B., Cohn M.A. & Leubner-Metzger G., 2005.
Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy
release and germination. Seed Science Research 15:
281–307.
Lacey EP., 1996. Parental Effects in Plantago lanceolata L. I.: A Growth Chamber Experiment to Examine Pre- and Postzygotic Temperature Effects. Evolution 50 (2):865-878.
Lafond G.P. & Baker R.J., 1986. Effects of Genotype
and Seed Size on Speed of Emergence and Seedling
Vigor in Nine Spring Wheat Cultivars. Crop Science
26 (2): 341-346.
Lambert D.A., 1967. The effect of nitrogen and irrigation on timothy (Phleum pratense) grown for production of seed. Journal of Agricultural Science 69:
231-239.
Lambert R.G. & Linck A.J., 1958. Effects of High
Temperature on Yield of Peas. Plant Physiology, 33
(5): 347–350
Leubner-Metzger G., 2003. Functions and regulation
of β-1,3-glucanase during seed germination, dormancy release and after-ripening. Seed Science Research 13: 17–34.
Lewis J.D. & Koide R.D., 1990. Phosphorus Supply,
Mycorrhizal Infection and Plant Offspring Vigour.
Functional Ecology 4 (5): 695-702.
Lonati M., Moot D.J., Aceto P., Cavallero A. & Lucas
R.J., 2009. Thermal time requirements for germination, emergence and seedling development of adventive legume and grass species. New Zealand Journal
of Agricultural Research 52 (1): 17-29.
Lucchese F., 1987. Ruolo di alcune specie del genere
Brachypodium nelle associazioni prative e forestali.
Not. Fitosoc. 23: 173-188.
Lucchese F., 1988. La distribuzione dei complessi
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas 105
Brachypodium pinnatum e B. rupestre nelle Alpi
orientali e Dinarche. Atti del Simposio della Società
Estalpino-Dinarica di itosociologia. Feltre 29 giugno-3luglio 1988: 147-160.
Martin C.C., 1975. The Role of Glumes and Gibberellic Acid in Dormancy of Themeda triandra Spikelets. Physiologia Plantarum 33 (2): 171-176.
Martinez-Carrasco R. & Thorne G.N., 1979. Physiological Factors Limiting Grain Size in Wheat. Journal
of Experimental Botany 30 (4): 669-679.
Maun M.A., Canode C.L. & Teareet I.D., 1969. Inluence of Temperature during Anthesis on Seed Set
in Poa pratensis L. Crop Science 9 (2): 210-212.
McGinley M.A., 1989. Within and among plant variation in seed mass and pappus size in Tragopogon
dubius. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1298-1304.
Meckel L., Egli D.B., Phillips R.E., Radcliffe D. &
Leggett J.E., 1984. Effect of Moisture Stress on
Seed Growth in Soybeans. Agronomy Journal 76
(4): 647-650.
Mendez M., 1997. Sources of variation in seed mass in
Arum italicum. International Journal of Plant Science 158: 298-305.
Mohamed H.A., Clark J.A. & Ong C.K., 1985. The
inluence of temperature during seed development
on the germination characteristics of millet seeds.
Plant, Cell and Environment 8 (5): 361–362.
Mott J.J., 1974. Mechanisms Controlling Dormancy in
the Arid Zone Grass Aristida contorta. I. Physiology
and Mechanisms of Dormancy. Australian Journal
of Botany 22(4): 635 - 645.
Munir M., Jmil M., Baloch J. & Khatak K.R., 2004.
Growth and Flowering of Antirrhinum majus L. Under Varying Temperatures. International Journal of
Agriculture and Biology 1: 173–178.
Negri V. & Falcinelli M., 1990 Inluence of seed
weight on seedling vigor of two accessions of
birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). 1. Effect on
leaf development and shoot growth. Agricoltura Mediterranea 120 (3): 316-321.
Newman E.I., 1963. Factors controlling the germination date of winter annuals. Journal of Ecology 51:
625-638.
Paracchini M. L., Petersen J-E., Hoogeveen Y., Bamps
C., Burield I. & Swaay van C., 2008. High Nature
Value Farmland in Europe. An Estimate of the Distribution Patterns on the Basis of Land Cover and
Biodiversity Data. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Ofice for Oficial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Parrish J.A.D. & Bazzaz F.A., 1985. Nutrient content
of Abutilon theophrasti seeds and the competitive
ability of the resulting plants. Oecologia 65: 247251.
Piccinin L., Scotton M. & Ziliotto U., 2004. Gamic
reproduction capacity of native species colonizers of
lysch landslides. European Society for Agronomy
VIII ESA Congress 11-15 July 2004 Copenhagen,
Denmark. Book of proceedings.
Probert R.J., 1992. The role of temperature in germination ecophysiology. In: Fenner M. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Wallingford, Oxon: CAB International, 285–325.
Probert R.J., 2000. The Role of Temperature in the
Regulation of Seed Dormancy and Germination. In
Fenner: Seeds. The ecology of regeneration in plant
communities. CABI Publishing, CAB International,
Wallingford, Oxon, UK pp: 261-292.
Probert R. J., Smith R. D. & Birch P., 1985a. Germination responses to light and alternating temperatures
in European populations of Dactylis glomerata L. I.
Variability in relation to origin. New phytologist 99:
305-316.
Probert R. J., Smith R. D. & Birch P., 1985b. Germination responses to light and alternating temperatures
in European populations of Dactylis glomerata L.
IV. Effects of storage. New Phytologist 101: 521529.
Probert R. J., Smith R. D. & Birch P., 1985c. Germination responses to light and alternating temperatures
in European populations of Dactylis glomerata L. V.
The principle components of the alternating temperature requirements. New Phytologist 102: 133-142.
Probert R. J., Smith R. D. & Birch P., 1985d. Germination responses to light and alternating temperatures
in European populations of Dactylis glomerata L.
III. The role of the outer covering structures. New
Phytologist 100: 447-455.
Probert R.J. & Smith R.D., 1986. The joint action of
phytochrome and alternating temperatures in the
control of seed germination in Dactylis glomerata.
Physiologia Plantarum 67 (2): 299–304.
Raju M.S.V. & Ramaswamy S.N., 1983. Studies on the
inlorescence of wild oats (Avena falua). Canadian
Journal of Botany 61: 74 78.
Ramseur E., Quisenberry V.L., Wallace S.U. & Palmer
J.H., 1984. Yield and Yield Components of ‘Braxton’ Soybeans as Inluenced by Irrigation and Intrarow Spacing. Agronomy Journal 76 (3): 442-446.
Ratcliffe D., 1961. Adaptation to habitat in a group of
annual plants. Journal of Ecology 49, 187-203.
Roach D.A., 1987. Variation in seed and seedling size
in Anthoxanthum odoratum. American Midland Naturalist 117: 258-264.
Roberts E.H., 1961. Dormancy in Rice Seed II: The
inluence of covering structures. Journal of Experimental Botany 12 (3): 430-445.
Roberts E.H., 1962. Dormancy in Rice Seed: III. The
inluence of temperature, moisture and gaseous environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 13 (1):
75-94.
106 Galiè et al.
Roberts E.H., 1988. Temperature and seed germination. In: Long SP, Woodward FI, eds. Plants and
temperature. Cambridge: Society of Experimental
Biology, Company of Biologists 109–132.
Roggero P.P., Bagella S., Farina R., 2002. Un archivio
dati di Indici speciici per la valutazione integrata
del valore pastorale [A database of speciic indices
for the integrated assessment of grazing value]. Riv.
Agron. Ital. 36: 149-156.
Ruiz de Clavijo E., 2002. Role of within-individual
variation in capitulum size and achene mass in the
adaptation of the annual Centaurea eriophora to varying water supply in a Mediterranean environment.
Annals of Botany 90: 279-286.
Sawhney R. & Naylor J.M., 1979. Dormancy studies
in seed of Avena fatua. 9. Demonstration of genetic
variability affecting the response to temperature during seed development. Canadian Journal of Botany
1979, 57(1): 59-63.
Schimpf D.J., 1977. Seed Weight of Amaranthus retrolexus in Relation to Moisture and Length of
Growing Season. Ecology 58 (2): 450-453.
Schmitt J., Niles J. & Wulff R.D., 1992 Norms of Reaction of Seed Traits to Maternal Environments in
Plantago lanceolata. The American Naturalist 139
(3): 451-466.
Scocco P., Brusaferro A., Catorci A., 2012. Comparison between two different methods for evaluating
rumen papillae measures related to different diets.
Microsc Res Tech. 75: 884-889.
Scocco P., Piero Ceccarelli P., Gatti R., Catorci A.,
2007. Use of a geographic information system to
evaluate morphometric variations of rumen papillae
related to diet and pasture vegetative cycle. Veterinaria Italiana 43 (3): 425-429.
Simons A.M. & Johnston M.O., 2000. Variation in
seed traits of Lobelia inlata (Campanulaceae):
sources and itness consequences. American Journal
of Botany 87: 124-132.
Simpson G.M., 1990. Seed dormancy in grasses. Cambridge University Press. pp 297.
Skerman R.H. & Humphreys L.R., 1973. Effect of
temperature during lowering on seed formation of
Stylosanthes humilis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24 (3): 317-324.
Soffer H. & Smith G.E., 1974. Studies on lettuce seed
quality. II. Relationship of seed vigor to emergence,
seedling weight and yield. Journal of the American
Society for Horticultural Science 98: 552-556.
Stamp N.E., 1990. Production and Effect of Seed Size
in a Grassland Annual (Erodium brachycarpum,
Geraniaceae). American Journal of Botany 77 (7):
874-882.
Stearns F., 1960. Effects of seed environment during
maturation on seedling growth. Journal Ecology 41
(1): 221-222.
Stokes P., 1965. Temperature and seed dormancy.
Encyclopedia of plant physiology 15 (2): 746-803.
Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Stromberg J.C. & Patten D.T,. 1990. Variation in Seed
Size of a Southwestern Riparian Tree, Arizona Walnut (Juglans major). American Midland Naturalist
124 (2): 269-277.
Sultan S.E., 1996. Phenotypic Plasticity for Offspring
Traits in Polygonum persicaria. Ecology 77 (6):
1791-1807.
Susko D.J. & Lovett-Doust L., 2000. Patterns of seed
mass variation and their effects on seedling traits in
Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). American Journal
of Botany 87 (1): 56-66.
Thanos C.A. & Mitrakos K., 1992. Watermelon seed
germination. I. Effects of light, temperature and
osmotica. Seed Science Research 2 (3): 155-162.
Thompson J.N. and Pellmyr O., 1989. Origins of variance in seed number and mass: Interaction of sex
expression and herbivory in Lomatium salmonilorum. Oecologia 79 :395-402.
Thompson K., 1989. A comparative study of germination responses to high irradiance light. Annals of
Botany 63 (1): 159-162.
Thompson K., 1990. Genome size, seed size and germination temperature in herbaceous angiosperms.
Evolutionary Trends in Plants 4: 113-116.
Thompson K. & Grime J.P., 1979. Seasonal variation
in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67: 893-92.
Thompson K., Grime J.P. & Mason G. 1977. Seed germination in response to diurnal luctuations of temperature. Nature, 267: 147-149.
Trudgill D.L. & Perry J.N., 1994. Thermal time and
ecological strategies - a unifying hypothesis. Annals
of Applied Biology 125: 521–532.
van Andel J. & Vera F., 1977. Reproductive Allocation
in Senecio sylvaticus and Chamaenerion angustifolium in Relation to Mineral Nutrition. Journal of
Ecology 65 (3): 747-758.
Vaughton G. & Ramsey M., 1997. Seed mass variation in the shrub Banksia spinulosa (Proteaceae):
resource constraints and pollen source effects. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (4): 424-431.
Vaughton G. & Ramsey M., 1998. Sources and consequences of seed mass variation in Banksia marginata (Proteaceae). Journal of Ecology 86: 563-573.
Vose P.B., 1956. Dormancy of seeds of Phalaris arundinacea and Phalaris tuberosa. Nature (London),
178: 1006-1007.
Walters M.B. & Reich P.B., 2000. Seed size, nitrogen
supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival
in deep shade. Ecology 81: 1887-1901.
Wardlaw I.F., 1970. The Early Stages of Grain Development in Wheat: Response to Light and Temperature in a Single Variety. Australian Journal of Biolo-
Brachypodium seed germination and marginal areas 107
gical Sciences 23(4): 765-774.
Westoby M., Jurado E. & Leishman M., 1992 Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends in
Ecology and Evolution 7 (11): 368-372.
Whalley R.D.B., McKell C.M. & Green L.R., 1966.
Seedling Vigor and the Early Nonphotosynthetic
Stage of Seedling Growth in Grasses. Crop Science
6 (2): 147-150.
Williams J.T. & Harper J.L., 1965. Seed polymorphism and germination. I. The inluence of nitrates and
low temperatures on the germination of Chenopodium album. Weed Research 5 (2): 141–150.
Williams M.C., 1960. Biochemical analyses, germination and production of black and brown seed of
Halogeton glomeratus. Weeds 8 (3): 452-61.
Willson M.F. & Price P.W., 1980. Resource limitation of fruit and seed production in some Asclepias
species. Canadian Journal of Botany 58(20): 22292233.
Winn A.A., 1988. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed size in Prunella vulgaris. Ecology
69: 1537-1544.
Withers N.J. & Forde B.J., 1979. Effects of water
stress on Lupinus albus. New Zealand Journal of
Agricultural Research 22 (3): 463-474.
Wood D.W., Scott R.K. & Longden P.C., 1980. The
effect of mother-plant temperature on seed quality in
Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet). Pp: 257-270 in Hebblethwaite (ed.). Seed production. Butterworth Ltd.,
London.
Wulff R.D., 1986. Seed Size Variation in Desmodium
paniculatum I. Factors affecting seed size. Journal of
Ecology 74: 99-114.
Yanful M. & Maun M.A., 1996. Effects of burial of
seeds and seedlings from different seed size on the
emergence and growth of Strophostyles helvola. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1322-1330.
Zhang D.Y., 1998. Evolutionarily stable reproductive
strategies in sexual organisms. IV. Parent-offspring
conlict and selection of seed size in perennial plants.
Journal of Theoretical Biology 192: 143-153.