Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Isatis An anatomical study of the genus Isatis in Iran "!# $ %$& ' ()*$% + , - . ' /)*$% "0 1 0 8 $5! 07( ! 2 3 4$5 ;><B=>=>; :@5+A, ! 6$ ;><?=;;=;< :9 + % !" I J 0 Isatis H &$ * 15+& G * 1 ;< E F5 ' ! 5C 6 D % H 04 D M 2 6$ " 39L+ MN O! % K Pachypterygium H &$ * 1 % D I+$ S * % R9 51 $5E MN O! % ! " +5) P 5Q* &$ % ' 3 9+ Isatis WO % Isatis H X.$ & $ $5 $ " P UV ' ! W+5) K +%51 TL)! 9] * Apterolobus YL 0 * 1 [ \$ % 2 Z! $5 R 0%"! 9 % 0YL 0 * 1 ]+5 "* ! '5U6 3 "! TL)! 0 1 $ $% ' ! 9 $ ^K '5S6 ' ! 2 X [ \$ 02 9 $ F _ ]+5 '5S6 2 9] * Isatis YL % !$ 9 $ ! . 3 "! %51 '5S6 '%5 1 02 % Samerarioides YL _+ R 3 "! aC 0YL 5+ $ YL I+$ `$5 $ 2 *$ UV _ * Eremoglaston YL % Pachypterygium Isatis %$& ' ()*$% ' 3 +$ $ *b+53 ]+5 5 K% "+ 0$ " +5) " 5 ( 2 $ ' * (* 3 $ " 3 K N %& ' #$ &$ ")L 2 3 4$5 6$ "!# $ ] /! 2 c ! 4$ / 0 ' d 0 * 1 % K 3 '%$% 4 )* a C I J 0 R 0%"! 4 )* ` 9UV / *$5+$ $ % K I+$ R9 $ ' )* ^ LC 2 3 6 P. multicaule ' 0 )! I+$ 9 $ ' 3 a5O! Isatis &$ Pachypterygium H ' K$ 7! . 4$ . " 5 % R K"! 9+ ' ! 9 % E ) ' I 51 5Q* % $ - \%$ 5C 9UV E &$ 5 1@5 % R 3 ' 0 )! 0YL WO % "]+5 ^Q* _ * 0F5 " +5) R )* 9 + $' . ' K$ P. brevipes ) * " M+ 5C 6 " 5 % 4 MN O! % ! * )+ P Isatis L. H % $% % Isatis * 1 fg % 6 4 % R * $% D M [3 '5 Pachypterygium Bge. % % M! %$ M i * 3"! 9 + "*$ h"*$5+$ O ! % ]N \ K Yildirimli 1988 l+%_* N /+ 0H R * $% Y K$5, $ *$5 + ! 5] h , $ "+ $5j Dk ! R 0 "*$ h"*$5+$ [N \ k _ * (Pachypterygium Sameraria) 4 $ i ' 3 +$ $ ]k I 51 5Q* % Parsa 1951 , [N E % $ Isatis H &$ N /+ [ \$ * 1 m (Busch 1939) @ (Boissier 1867) ]k YL n , 0YL [N E % $ Isatis * 1 m _ * (Hedge 1968) n0 R9 $ '%5K 0 * 1 I+$ 5ZK$ K 9 $ '% Apterolobus Eremoglaston Samerarioides Isatis $ $% 0 * 1 _ $ I. stenocarpa I. biscutellifolia 5(+% * 1 % R 0 N /+ % $ 5+& * 1 e ;pq< n0 _! * 1 m 4 ! &$ R9 $ '%5K 5Ko " K * TE * * * 4 !5 E I. trachycarpa * 1 Rechinger 1977 5( 3 R9 $ '% 4$5+$ )K '% ! rss> 4$ / 0 I J 0 R *%5K @ $_1 _ * $ I. cochlearis * 1 ;pp< I. spectabilis I. tinctoria I. ornithorhynchus 0 * 1 @ $_1 I C rssB rss? I. cappadocica subsp. - * + * 15+& I. tinctoria subsp. tomentella * 15+& %$ M t S! % R *%5K " 5M! $ (Sajedi et al. 2005) kurdica Sajedi & Sharifnia l ! *$ 04 &$ * 1 Y3 K 9 $ ' * 1 mm 4$5+$ % Isatis H 0 *1 R 3 "! V rssB 4$ / 0 i _ * 4$5+$ % H I+$ % . "! * K 9 + " P " P$% 8 ! % Isatis H " +5) " 5 * 1 u 0 !$ 9 $ 5+A, R )* 9 $ '%$% a53 $ I. arenaria * 1 "/ ! * % M $ "P5 Gench u 1 'v+ H I+$ 0 * 1 " 39L+ % t % R Yildirimli 1988 ee 4$5+$ % Isatis H " +5) " 5 0@ %5 K 9 $ H I+$ 0 * 1 "E$5 $ 0"1v+ I+5 ! K ' ! 4% t ! X.$ I i $ % % ! ! $ "+ (L , Q ! " +5) 0" 5 * ! 7 /! R 3 U! 9 $ I/ ! H I+$ +$ "0 1 0 ! 0- + 50 " M $5! "k _K$5! (TUH) 4$5 ' ()*$% (TARI) 8 $5! 07( ! &$ 0 * * $ ] /! 5 19* !$ w 4$ 0 ! $ _+5] "M ]k 8 ! & )K % % ! 0 * * K 4 !5K "M ]k 8 ! & )K _K5! - + 50 e _ +, 2 k % I J 0 R9 51 $5E " & " 5 % ! ` 0- + 50 " 5\4 S+ o I+ _E 4# 1 4 %5K 4$ 0 4$ *& ! 4$5 04 $ 5 ! R +%51 8 0 * 1 "P5 &$ "+ 0 * * 4 "E534 S+ o 4$5+$ &$ ' 3 @ $_1 0 * 1 K ' ! F5 E P " +5) 0" 5 % &$ + * +%51 8 "+$5 V . % '& V 0 * * R9 51 $5E MN O! % ! % I J 0 Isatis H &$ * 1 5+& G * 1 ' S0 R * 3 3$%5 "! + 50 0 * * H 04 D M 2 6$ " 39L+ MN O! % K Pachypterygium H &$ * 1 KR 2 9 51 $5E MN O! % ! " +5) P 5Q* &$ % ' 3 9+ Isatis R% 3"! $ (* IRAN) "0 1 0 ! - + 50 % 0 * * "! + 50 0 * * : 7/N$ I+5 1 2 ! % ' 3 8 '& 0 * * $5h6 ^h+#! h!51 x % E% g ! $ $ K [ 5 I+$ * 3 "0%x $ $ * 3 '%$% $5E F.A.A. ' K 9 ]Z 2 ! % 9. m ! 0 * * Hd R * 3 '%$% $5h 3 - S*$ y " % V 5 1@5 R )1 7 ! V % g 7/N$ Hd {2 $z x % h E% h g h! h h0@5h 4%$% $5hE : 3 $5 $ 5+& 76$5! +# $ { h E% l+ ! V% l $ $ % 4%$% $5E { 5O ! x 0@5 ) 3 h h) 3 { h E% ! " $& I! K % 0@5 4%$% $5E { m 5O ! x ) 3 5hO ! x h h) 3 h * | g h g h! I !" % 4%$% $5E { 5O ! x h6$ "!#h $ %$& ' (h)*$% h+ , - h . ' /h)*$% ' ()+ !& % " +5) 0" 5 R R9 5+A, V 4 / * " /. I % _ S! * } / 5/ ! &$ '% U $ 2 3 4$5 R 3 - S*$ 0 * 1 K ' ! ^ 5 I J 0 R 3 H/. m g % 6 t S! % (IRAN) e " +5) 0" 5 % '% U $ % ! 4$ / 0 ' d 0 * *9 5 ~ 2 $/,- . ) /0 !5 5 ! mm g m gg •$% (IRAN 15662) ' 3 E Isatis glauca " + N$w 5 ! 4 S ! & 2 ] ' K :4 !5K I. pachycarpa "* +$ "* !5 E 5 ! eg € $ % 3 . 4$& $ 5 ! K IN$ IRAN 15685 1 ' K K ! :" 5\4 S+ o + U $ 5( 3 + :"E534 S+ o I. cochlearis ' 3 E 6 9 5 :4 $5P I. leuconeura (IRAN 15609) 5 )*$5+$ 5 ! • g % 50 3 % 6$ 5 ! K g :4 $5P I. emarginata (IRAN 15661) ! 5 )*$5+$ 5 ! m gg 4 ! 1 : L I. kotschyana (IRAN 15732) b+53 (IRAN 15698) % 3 "*$5 !5 5( x 0o 7,5 I+5 35‚E :' )* !5K I. raphanifolia $ 5 )*$5+$ 5 ! gg l $ :4 5 ! egg G m g '5 d $ '5+_ :" 5\4 S+ o I. minima I. lusitanica (IRAN 42526) (IRAN 15699) 5 I. trachycarpa )*$5+$ ƒ 0 x % % 6$ :4 5 ! ;pss ' 5E „5k w 5 ! K g:4 %5K I. buschiana (IRAN 38500) / $ I. gaubae (IRAN 38459) l „5k ' K& 5 :4$5 "( E (IRAN 36519) "*$5 5 ! m gg m gg I+_+% :4$5 / $ "( E (IRAN 38496) (IRAN 38519) " "] x5. '_ 6 ' K S :4 3 0 H* +$&5 ! 5 ! m g YK"N K *%51 (IRAN 15727) % (IRAN 15598) % (IRAN 39110) (IRAN 15615) 5 )*$5+$ 5 ! gg / $ "( E +%_+$ %5K I. cappadocica subsp. Besseri '% :€ -$5 „5k %5K g 5 3K 2 3 gg 4$5 S*$ 4 I. cappadocica subsp. steveniana I. cappadocica subsp. kurdica !5 5 ! mgg 71' K 9L " : + ( K I. cappadocica 5 ! K mg m :4 $5P (IRAN 16157) 5 )*$5+$ 5 ! I. campylocarpa *$ :%_+ I. rugulosa %5! w5K :4$5 x5. '_ 6 ' K :4 I. tinctoria x "E53x ef 5 ! K ff :4 (IRAN 16180) 2 + subsp. macrocarpa Pachypterygium brevipes P. multicaule 4$5+$ % Isatis H " +5) " 5 3 Isatis 0H €5 % % 0 *1 E :% 3"! +$ $ 5+& a53 " +5) $ )1 2 F5 ' ! " 5 n+ * P 5Q* &$ 4$5+$ % Pachypterygium ' !~ [ \$ % 2 Z! $5 R 0%"! 4 )* 0YL & $ $5 $ " P UV ' ! W+5) 0 1 $ $% ' ! 9 $ ^K '5S6 ' ! 2 9] * Apterolobus YL 0 * 1 3 "! TL)! '5S6 2 9] * Isatis YL % !$ 9 $ ! ]+5 "* ! '5U6 % Samerarioides YL _+ R 3 "! X [ \$ 02 9 $ F _ ]+5 "+ )\ 2 *$ UV _ * Eremoglaston YL % 9 $ %51 '5S6 '%5 1 02 - S*$ $ 0 )! n+ * R 0%"! 4 )* a C 0YL 5+ &$ $ YL I+$ `$5 $ '5S6 4% 7/3 ^ I J 0 R9 $ ' ! 0YL l /U 5+& % 0' ! "C5. @5 ' 3 R9 $ ' 3 +$ $ ; 7/3 % Isatis H b L! 0 * 15+& 0 * 1 0' ! Isatis 45 9)0 ' ! ' 3 - S*$ " 5 9 $ ' 3 @ $_1 4$5+$ % * 1 * YL I+$ &$ 1 5 TL)! 02 YL I+$ % … V$ : 0%"! 4 )* $ 5+& n+ * r 7/3 04 &$ * 1 &$ 5 lG K "N TL)! [ \$ 1 R 3 "! 5 j ! 7/3 * 5 lG K &$ "* ! % $% ' ! 5 7/3 * 1 K I. pachycarpa Z $ 3 "! Apterolobus YL *1 % 9 $ '5S6 ! + 5 I , [ \$ 02 R9 $ t ! _ * 0†5K *1 % % 3 "! '5S6 &$ 5 ' K 2 I. cochlearis I. gaubae I. lusitanica, K† * 2 3 6 I. cochlearis % _ † * 2 3 6 I. gaubae I. lusitanica YL ]3 _ * * 1 I+$ '5S6 1 R 3 "! Apterolobus YL ]3 2 R 3 "! Apterolobus + Isatis 0YL I. lusitanica I. cochlearis 0 * 1 D M % 4 k$ - . 50 ‡ " 39L+ € $ 5 Apterolobus ' 3 a5O! _ * Davis 1964 H+ +% i 4 )* " +5) " 5 % %%51"! TL)! > r 07/3 + ! K * 14 0 !$ R9 $ 1 2 9! LC 9] * ˆ N &$ I. gaubae '$5 0 ' 3 % + * 1 % K 9 $ ' 3 '%$% $5E Isatis YL % " % * $% Apterolobus H 0 *1 " ! U 5 K"6 + ! 2 9! LC Apterolobus 0 * 1 [ \$ % K [ 5 I+$ R *5 1"! e 4$ / 0 A 1 A2 E D J K B C 1 C2 C3 H G F ' d I L Q Q1 Q3 P M N Q4 O .Isatis H Q b L! Q 0 * 1 % ' ! ~; 7/3 Fig 6. Fruit in different Isatis species: A1-2. I. gaubae, B. lusitanica, C1-3. I. glauca, D. I. emarginata, E. I. trachycarpa, F. I. tinctoria, G. I. kotschyana, H. I. pachycarpa, I. I. raphanifolia, J. I. minima, K. I. ornithorhynchus, L. I. rugulosa, M. I. campylocarpa, N. I. cochlearis, O. I. cochlearis, P. I. buschiana, Q1. I. cappadocica subsp. subradiata, Q2. I. cappadocica subsp. cappadocica, Q3. I. cappadocica subsp. besseri, Q4. I. cappadocica subsp. stevaniana, Q5. I. cappadocica subsp. Macrocarpa, Q6. I. cappadocica subsp. stenophylla. e 4$5+$ % Isatis H " +5) " 5 I+$ 3 "! 1 &$ 5 ^ LC 5 $5 % 7E$ 6 ` * 1 02 !$ 9 $ 1 9! LC &$ "]* 2 " +5) " 5 € $5 .% 3"! 9 + Isatis YL 0 * 1 [ \$ % 9UV 1 $ $% "+ )\ _ * '5S6 R 3 "! ' 3 ^ LC *$ % "+ )\ †& * I. trachycarpa 2 *$ 5C $ 0 )! I+$ R9 $ &51 ]+5 &51 0†5K l+ R K"! +‰ $ Eremoglaston YL Isatis YL &$ I. trachycarpa C B A D F E H .Isatis YL G 0 * 1 ' ! "C5. @5 ~r 7/3 Fig. 1. T.S. fruit of section Isatis: A. I. lusitanica, B. I. gaubae, C. I. cochlearis, D. I. pachycarpa, E. I. tinctoria, F. I. leuconeura, G. I. kotschyana, H. I. glauca. e• 4$ / 0 ' d Apterolobus 45 ' 3 @ $_1 4$5+$ &$ * 1 Y3 / *$5+$ % YL I+$ &$ ' 3 5Ko * 1 9U0 &$ I. koeiei * 1 l+ 9 51 $5E " +5) " 5 % ! > 7/3 * 1 n , ' ! K 9 $ I+$ 0' ! "C5. @5 " 5 % R )* ˆ N " 5 I+$ % * * " 5 % - . 9 . ' 3 I+$ &$ 4$5+$ % K 2 9! LC '$5 0 ' ! "! . 7/3 I 51 5Q* % YL 2 9! LC I. raphanifolia _ 0 * 1 - % ]+5 K 3 ' 0 )! 9 $ ' 3 5 , TL)! - ! "S U $ 3 _ * "* ! 1 9 $ '5S6 &$ 5 lG K _ G* R 3 "! 1 9! LC 5 $5 ]+5 4 9! LC "N#0 [ \$ 02 R 3 "! "N P 02 ' ' ! % "N 9 $ "S U $ € * ' ! 02 I. raphanifolia * 1 % YL I+$ D M ! 0 * 1 0 % R 3 "! '5S6 &$ 5 I , 2 650 % %%51"! $'5U6 0 *1 K 02 % * 0 % %$ M R 3 "! I , X %51 "* ! '5S6 * 0 % K I. raphanifolia * 1 I 51 5Q* % 4 3 "! mf e YL I+$ R * $% P5 t &$ 0†5K YL I+$ % R % ]* @ 3 7 E % ! * * C A B E D R Apterolobus YL 0 * 1 ' ! "C5. @5 ~> 7/3 Fig. 2. T.S. fruit of section Apterolobus: A. I. campylocarpa, B. I. rugulosa, C. I. minima, D. I. raphanifolia, E. I. buschiana. g 4$5+$ % Isatis H " +5) " 5 Eremoglaston 45 * 1 l+ Hedge 1968 / *$5+$ $ % YL I+$ &$ ' 3 5Ko * 1 % &$ * 1 I+$ … % ' 3 a5O! % $ ! K 9 $ ' 3 @ $_1 4$5+$ &$ I. emarginata "! $ 4$5+$ % 5C 6 D &$ Y , K $ * 1 % I. trachycarpa '$5 0 9 51 $5E " +5) " 5 % ! S +$ % * 3"! P 3 P. multicaule P. brevipes $ $% ' ! 3 6 % ` * 1 G 50 K 3 '%$% 4 )* a C S * % R ? 7/3 WO % 7E$ 6 K 0 &51 0†5K $ $% '5S6 % 'v+ $'v! 0†5K _! * 1 G 50 % I J 0 R + "! 3 " 0$ _+ 6 †$5 3$ YL ^ LC _ * ' ! -% ' )* ^ LC ` * 1 G 50 % ' ! 1 R 3 "! "+ )\ '5S6 2 3 6 P. multicaule P. brevipes 0 * 1 % R9 $ "N * , 5 \ ' P ' )* / *$5+$ $ % K I+$ R9 $ ' 3 ^ LC 5(+% * 1 % % ' )* ^ LC Isatis &$ Pachypterygium H ' K$ 7! . 4$ . ` 9UV Hedge 1968 ' ! 9 % E ) ' I 51 5Q* % $ - \%$ 5C ' 0 )! I+$ 9 $ ' 3 a5O! R K"! 9+ A B D C .Eremoglaston YL 0 * 1 ' ! "C5. @5 ~? 7/3 Fig. 2. T.S. fruit of section Eremoglaston: A. I. emarginata, B. I. trachycarpa, C. I. brevipes, D. I. multicaule. 4$ / 0 ' d Samerarioides 45 YL D M ! 0 * 1 "C5. @5 % 3 ' 3$ … % K k4 0 7 E 0 * 1 5+ &$ B 7/3 %51 '5S6 '%5 1 02 % ˆ N Samerarioides I. cappadocica 0 * 15+& % 1 : 3 "! 5+& a53 $ 0 )! 5+ *% l /U % TL)! * l+ I. cappadocica subsp. macrocarpa subsp. steveniana I , "S U $ $ $ 02 R9 $ ' ! 5 TL)! I. cappadocica subsp. besseri * 15+& I. cappadocica subsp. % + %51 [ \$ '5S6 R 0 ' * 3l+ ' ]/+ + n+ R9 $ I , X macrocarpa A B D C RSamerarioides YL &$ I. cappadocica 0 * 15+& ' ! "C5. @5 ~B 7/3 Fig. 2. T.S. fruit of section Samerarioides: A. I. cappadocica subsp. steveniana, B. I. cappadocica subsp. macrocarpa, C. I. cappadocica subsp. besseri, D. I. cappadocica subsp. kurdica. m 4$5+$ % Isatis H " +5) " 5 F5 ~ b L! 0YL % "]+5 ^Q* b L! 0 * 1 0F5 " +5) " 5 % l+ $ $% "* ! F5]1 9 ME ! % 0 * 1 [ \$ Isatis YL % R 3 ' 0 )! 5+& a53 A2 A1 B2 B1 C1 C2 D2 RIsatis H b L! 0YL D1 DM ! 0 * 1 F5 "C5. @5 ~q 7/3 A. I. glauca, B. I. campylocarpa, C. I. emarginata, D. I. cappadocica subsp. besseri eX Kv $ A2, B2, C2, D2 0H/. gX Kv $ A1, B1, C1, D1 0H/. R9 $ ' 3 Fig. 5. Leaf T.S. of Isatis species from different sections: A. I. glauca, B. I. campylocarpa, C. I. emarginata, D. I. cappadocica subsp. besseri. Note: figs A1, B1, C1 and D1 are taken with objective 10X, and figs A2, B2, C2 and D2 with objective 4X. 4$ / 0 ' d 9 ME ! % 0 * 1 [ \$ Apterolobus YL % R q A 7/3 3 "! 5 #! K „5k % &$ 5 TL)! 5 1 _ "* ! "( 5 K 3 "! "( 5 $ $% "* ! F5]1 % $% "( 5 „5k % &$ 1 Eremoglaston YL % R q B 7/3 9 $ 5(+% "( 5 YL % R q C 7/3 3 "! * % $ $% F5]1 I. brevipes Z $ R q D 7/3 3 "! "( 5 4 „5k % &$ ]+5 "* ! F5]1 Samerarioides E ~ R )* ' 0 )! ' K$ 9UV Isatis b L! 0 * 1 E &$ 5 1@5 % V "! ,$ +… R 3 ' 0 )! $% + $& $% 3 %51 0 E b L! 0YL % 0 0 * 1 % +… 9)0 % &$ _K5! *$ $ - ,$ 7V 6 02 +…l I J 0 R K" * % S+$ 0YL % $ "V P ' K $ 9 MC K 3 ' 0 )! 0YL R 3 ' 0 )! % m mg i ! k 4 0 1 &$ ' 51 I+$ % * 0 % %$ M , R% 3 M $5! " YL "0 1 ' /)*$% ! (*$ I ! 38-39 ! * 0 *b+53 ]+5 5 K% {;p>pB 4$5 $ "UO‚! 5 K% 2 3 4$5 UV 8 ! Q6#! 9 ' d ( 7 ;?B? " , ` V 0" 6$ "!# $ %$& ' ()*$% " R8 $5! 07( * E-mail: sepidehsajedi@yahoo.com e 6 39 +& Summary Rostaniha, Vol. 7 (1), 2006 AN ANATOMICAL STUDY OF THE GENUS ISATIS IN IRAN * S. SAJEDI , F. SHARIFNIA and M. ASSADI Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Islamic Azad Univ. (N. Tehran Branch) and Forests & Rangeland Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran Received: 07.02.2006 Accepted: 21.06.2006 As a complement to morphological research on the genus Isatis (Brassicaceae), an anatomical study was conducted on the fruit, leaf and stem of 18 species and four subspecies of this genus, as well as two species belonging to the genus Pachypterygium. Inclusion of the members of the later genus in the study was to clarify the evidences that supported their affinity to the genus Isatis. As a result, it was found that, fruit and leaf anatomy yields useful information for the genera under study, as documented by photographs taken from transverse section of these organs and the stem. It also supported the idea of transferring Pachypterygium brevipes and P. multicaule to the section Eremoglaston of Isatis, as the fruit anatomy of these species showed that the only stated distinctive characteristic of them from Isatis, i.e. thickened fruit margins, did not hold good. In addition, there were very close similarities observed between the above species and the members of the section * Corresponding author S. Sajedi et al. Eremoglaston in terms of membranous loculus and hair type, which is a very important distinctive characteristic particularly at sectional level. The study also involved preparing drawings of the fruits of all available species. Key words: Isatis, Brassicaceae, Pachypterygium, Anatomy To observe the figures, please refer to the Persian text (pages: ). References AKHANI, H. 2003. Notes on the Flora of Iran: 4. Two new records and synopsis of the new data on Iranian Cruciferae since Flora Iranica. Candollea 58: 369-385. ASSADI, M. 1988. A guide to flora of Iran. Forests & Rangelands Research Institute Publications. BOISSIER, E. 1867. Flora Orientalis, 1: 376-384. BUSCH, N. 1939. Cruciferae-Isatis. In: Komarov, V.L. (ed.). Flora of the USSR. 8: 203-222 DAVIS, P.H. 1965. Cruciferae-Isatis. In: Davis, P.H. (ed.). Flora of Turkey and the East Islands I. 287-367. DAVIS, P.H. 1964. Materials for a Flora of Turkey: 7, Cruciferae: Isatis. Notes RBG Edinb. 26: 11-25. GHAHRAMAN, A. 1998. Flora of Iran. Vol. 18, Forests & Rangelands Research Institute Publications. HEDGE, I.C. and Lamond, J.M. 1980. Cruciferae-Isatis. In: Townsend, C.C. & Guest, E. (eds). Flora of Iraq. 4-2: 900-908. HEDGE, I.C. 1968. Cruciferae-Isatis. In: Rechinger, K.H. (ed.). Flora Iranica. 57: 77-90. JAFRI, S.M.H. 1973. Brassicaceae-Isatis. In: Nasir, E. & Ali, S.I. (eds). Flora of West Pakistan 55: 69-77. PARSA, A. 1951. Flora de l’Iran 1: 852-866. 38 An anatomical study of the genus Isatis in Iran QUICK, D.L. 1993. Principles and techniques of contemporary taxonomy, Chapman Hall, London. RECHINGER, K.H. 1951. Cruciferae iranica novae vel minus cognitae. Phyton Annales Rei Botanicae, Vol. 3, Fasc. 1 & 2. RECHINGER, K.H. 1977. Plants of the Touran Protected Area. Iran Journ. Bot. 1 (2): 1077. SAJEDI, S., SHRIFNIA, F. and ASSADI, M. 2003. A species of Isatis new to Iran. Rostaniha 4 (3-4): 157-158. SAJEDI, S., SHRIFNIA, F. and ASSADI, M. 2005. A Study of the genus Isatis in Iran. Rostaniha 6 (1): 47-66. SAJEDI, S., SHARIFNIA, F. and SONBOLI, A. 2004. A verification of Isatis tinctoria in Iran. Rostaniha 5 (1): 51-52. SCHULZ, O.E. 1936. Cruciferae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds), Die Naturlchen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn. Vol. 17b. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 227-658. STAC, C.A. 1989. Plant taxonomy and bio-systematics. Chapman & Hall, London. STEWART, R.R. 1972. Cruciferae-Isatis. In: Nasir, E. & Ali, S.I. (ed.). Flora of West Pakistan 55: 317-318. YILDIRIMLI, S. 1988. Turkiyenin Bati Yarsi Ve Kuzeyindeki Isatis L. (Cruciferae) Cinsinin Revizyonu. DOGA TU Botanik D. 12, 3 -TBAG- 619. * Addresses of the authors: S. SAJEDI , Dept. of Botany, Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., P.O. Box 1454, Tehran 19395; Dr. F. SHARIFNIA, Islamic Azad Univ. (N. Tehran Branch) and Dr. M. ASSADI, Forests & Rangelands Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran. * E-mail: sepidehsajedi@yahoo.com 39 S. Sajedi et al. 40