Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biodiversity Conservation of the Genus Incarvillea Juss. (Bignoniaceae) Based on Molecular Diversity and Species Richness Assessment

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incarvillea is a genus with considerable ornamental and medicinal value, yet many of its 16 species are threatened in the wild and two (Incarvillea forrestii and Incarvillea altissima) may be extinct. An extensive field survey of the Chinese species has shown that logging is the greatest threat to woodland margin species, while overgrazing by cattle endangers species from alpine meadows. To aid the setting of conservation priorities, we used phylogenetic weighting of species, based on the molecular phylogeny of both nuclear (nrITS) and chloroplast (trnL-F region) gene regions. We estimated molecular diversity with measures for genetic diversity (GD) and phylogenetic diversity (PD). PD/GD values highlighted the importance of Incarvillea sinensis and two Central Asian species, Incarvillea semiretschenskia and Incarvillea olgae from Kazakstan and Kirghizia, for which little is known. This combination of phylogenetic and complementarity analyses focused on the provinces of Sichuan, Yunnan, and Qinghai, with Yunnan having the only adequately protected areas for that genus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen ST, Guan KY, Zhou ZK, Fuijiki T (2003) Pollen morphology of the genus Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae). Acta Bot Yunnan 25:457–467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ST, Zhou ZK, Guan KY, Nakata M (2004) Karyomorpholoical study of Incarvillea Juss. (Bignoniaceae) and its implications in distribution and taxonomy. Bot J Linn Soc 144:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ST, Guan KY, Zhou ZK, Olmstead R, Cronk Q (2005) Molecular phylogeny of Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae) based on ITS and trnL-F sequences. Am J Bot 92:625–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ST, Guan KY, Zhou ZK (2006) A new subgenus of Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae). Ann Bot Fenn 43:288–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1992) Genetic diversity and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 61:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1997a) Preserving the information content of species: genetic diversity, phylogeny and conservation worth. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:243–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1997b) A genetic diversity approach to conservation: genetic similarities and differences between species. Proc Assoc Adv Anim Breed Genet 12:624–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Kusmierski RM (1994) Genetic distances and the setting of conservation priorities. In: Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain DK (eds) Conservation Genetics. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Apagow PM, Pedersen K (1999) Towards complete biodiversity assessment: an evaluation of the subterranean bacterial communities in the Oklo region of the sole surviving natural nuclear reactor. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28:325–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen J, Alexander JCM, Brickell CD, Edmondson JR, Green PS, Heywood VH, Jørgensen PM, Jury SL, Knees SG, Maxwell HS, Miller DM, Robson NKB, Walters SM, Yeo PF (2000) Incarvillea. In: The European garden glora (IV). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 354–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1994) Phylogenetic diversity: a general framework for the prediction of feature diversity. In: Forey PL, Humphries CJ, Vane-Wright RI (eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Clarendon, Oxford, UK, pp 251–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C (1994) Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey-Wilson C (1994) A survey of Incarvillea in cultivation. New Plantsman 1:36–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey-Wilson C (1998) A new look at the subgenus Pteroscleris. New Plantsman 5:76–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson AJC (1961) A revision of the genus Incarvillea. Notes Roy Bot Gard Edinburgh 23:303–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiangsu New Medical College (1995) Incarvillea. In: Dictionary of traditional Chinese medicine. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, pp 2343–2357

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus J, Sarkar S (2002) The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. J Biosci 27:421–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GMS, Stuart N (1994) Draft IUCN red list categories, version 2.2. Species 21–22:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2003) Preserving the tree of life. Science 300:1707–1709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2005) Biological diversity. Curr Biol 15:R116–R118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1992) How many species inhabit the earth? Sci Am 267:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A (1993) Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary processes in East African cichlid fishes. Trends Ecol Evol 8:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich MF, Farris JS (1981) The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst Zool 30:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M, Chi YM, Yan WM, Nakasugi Y, Yoshizawa T, Irino N, Hashimoto F, Kinjo J, Nohara T, Sakurada S (1999) Strong antinociceptive effect of incarvillateine, a novel monoterpene alkaloid from Incarvillea sinensis. J Nat Prod 62:1293–1294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M, Kido K, Kinjo J, Nohara T (2000) Antinociceptive substances from Incarvillea delavayi. Phytochemistry 53:253–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M, Chi YM, Yan WM, Yonezawa A, Nakasugi Y, Yoshizawa T, Hashimoto F, Kinjo J, Nohara T, Sakurada S (2001) Structure-antinociceptive activity studies of incarvillateine, a monoterpene alkaloid from Incarvillea sinensis. Planta Med 67:114–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nee S, May RM (1997) Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science 278:692–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2001) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0 beta 10. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WT, Pan KY, Zhang ZY, Li ZY (1990) Incarvillea Juss.. In: Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae, vol 69. Science Press, Beijing, pp 34–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1992) The Diversity of Life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao QS (1988) A new species of Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae) from Sichuan. J Syst Evol 26:78–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30770137), the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (2007C087M), and the West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhekun Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, S., Gong, J., Guan, K. et al. Biodiversity Conservation of the Genus Incarvillea Juss. (Bignoniaceae) Based on Molecular Diversity and Species Richness Assessment. J. Plant Biol. 53, 387–394 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-010-9127-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-010-9127-6

Keywords

Navigation