https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8195-6738
Figures
Abstract
A new species, Carex borealifujianica Y.F. Lu & X.F. Jin (Cyperaceae, sect. Occlusae of core Carex clade) is described and illustrated from northern Fujian, China. In addition to morphological comparisons with its relatives, comparative micromorphology of utricles and achenes of seven species in Carex sect. Occlusae was examined. Micromorphology of utricles and achenes revealed the similarity of Carex borealifujianica and C. ligulata. Morphologically, this new species is similar to Carex ligulata in having lateral spikes remote and densely flowered, as well as utricles densely hispidulous, but differs in having 2 or 3 narrowly clavate staminate spikes, leaves 2.5–5 mm wide with sheaths sparsely pilose, and achenes emarginate at the apex. The phylogenetic analysis from two nuclear DNA regions (ETS and ITS) and two chloroplast DNA regions (matK and trnL-F) of 68 taxa resolved C. borealifujianica as a distinct species.
Citation: Lu Y-F, Jin X-F, Yu M-J (2022) Carex borealifujianica (Cyperaceae), a new species of the core Carex clade from Fujian, southeastern China. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0264419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264419
Editor: Gongle Shi, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA
Received: February 8, 2021; Accepted: February 8, 2022; Published: March 31, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: We have uploaded the data (Original data for PCA analysis, and sequences for phylogenetic analysis) on Dryad, and received the DOIs: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zkh1893c3.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32070218, 31770212). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Carex L., a cosmopolitan genus containing ca. 2000 known species divided into 130+ sections, is one of the largest genera of flowering plants [1–4]. The genus is distributed across every continent with the exception of Antarctica and grows in various habitats ranging from tropical forests to Arctic tundra [5]. The genus Carex is unique within the family Cyperaceae and characterized by its unisexual flowers with pistillate flowers surrounded by a fully or partially connate sac-like structure (utricle) [6].
The genus Carex (sedges) is also notoriously difficult in both taxonomy and phylogeny. In the past ten years, phylogenetic studies revealed that Carex as traditionally circumscribed is largely paraphyletic [6, 7]. The genus Carex now includes Cymophyllus Mack., Kobresia Willd., Schoenoxiphium Nees, and Uncinia Pers. Recent studies revealed Carex is comprised of six major clades corresponding to six subgenera: 1) the Siderosticta clade (subg. Siderosticta Waterway), sister to the rest of the genus and the earliest diverging lineage, with large chromosomes but low numbers of chromosomes; 2) the Schoenoxiphium clade (subg. Psyllophorae (Degl.) Peterm.), a relatively old group showing a striking disjunction of Western Palearctic, South America and Southern Africa; 3) the Unispicate clade (subg. Euthyceras Peterm.), with inflorescence usually reducing to a single spike or paniculiform, rarely racemose and spike-like; 4) the Uncinia clade (subg. Uncinia (Pers.) Peterm.), almost distributed in Western Hemisphere, with most species having solitary spike; 5) the Vignea clade (subg. Vignea (P. Beauv. ex T. Lestib.) Heer), including nearly all species traditionally placed in subg. Vignea; 6) the core Carex clade (subg. Carex), with the majority of subg. Carex, subg. Vigneastra and subg. Phyllophora of Kükenthal [8–13].
The species diversity within Carex in China is incredibly rich (including the former genus Kobresia) with 570+ species and 276 endemics [14]. Explorations after the publication of the Flora of China (Cyperaceae), have disclosed many new species of Carex following studies of regional floras, which shows Carex to be a mega-diverse genus in China [15–38]. Due to the morphological variability in Carex, as well as high species diversity, sectional assignment is a gateway to species identification. A section, as an infrageneric taxonomic category, is a very important taxonomic rank used widely in floras [11]. Section Occlusae is characterized by having hairy utricles, culm nodes exserted beyond the closed leaf sheaths, and initially included four species (Carex ligulata Nees, C. maubertiana Boott, C. hebecarpa C.A. Mey. and C. sclerocarpa Franch.). Now, it includes about eight species, of which seven occur in China, and are distributed in E or SE Asia [14, 34].
Mount Wuyi, located in northern Fujian and southern Jiangxi provinces, is a famous mountain in Southeast China and is one of the typical ‘Danxia’ landforms referring to various landscapes found in southeast, southwest and northwest China that consist of a red bed characterized by steep cliffs. Mount Wuyi is one of the biodiversity hotspots in China [39]. The flora of Mount Wuyi contains 3700+ vascular plants including a number of species named from this mountain, e.g. Dryopteris wuyishanica Ching & P.S. Chiu (Dryopteridaceae), Berberis wuyiensis C.M. Hu (Berberidaceae), Sinosenecio wuyiensis Y.L. Chen (Asteraceae), Thalictrum wuyishanicum W.T. Wang & S.H. Wang (Ranunculaceae), Rhododendron wuyishanicum L.K. Ling (Ericaceae), Impatiens wuyiensis J.S. Wang, Y.F. Lu & X.F. Jin (Balsaminaceae), Carex wuyishanensis S.Yun Liang (Cyperaceae), Pleioblastus wuyishanensis Q.F. Zheng & K.F. Huang and Yushania wuyishanensis Q.F. Zheng & K.F. Huang (Poaceae). Wuyishan National Nature Reserve and National Park attracts botanists and ecologists. In the present study, we recognize a recently collected sedge from Mount Wuyi as a new species. This new species is similar to C. ligulata, but differs in a number of morphological characters. We studied the morphology of the species, and determined its phylogenetic position, along with describing it below.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Twenty-two samples representing 18 taxa were used for molecular phylogenetic analyses without any protected species. The materials used for DNA extraction in this work were collected in Lin’an, Longquan, Pan’an counties of Zhejiang Province, Wuyishan City and Wuyishan Scenic Area of Fujian Province, and Maqu County of Gansu Province, all with permission of local government agencies or officers. Specimen examinations were permitted by curators of several herbaria, and the other sequences were directly downloaded from GenBank. A complete list of the samples used for phylogenetic analysis with GenBank accession numbers is shown in Table 1.
Nomenclature
The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) in a work with an ISSN or ISBN will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants; thus, the new names contained in the electronic publication of a PLOS ONE article are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone, so there is no longer any need to provide printed copies. In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to IPNI, from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The IPNI LSIDs can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID contained in this publication to the prefix http://ipni.org/. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.
Population sampling and specimen examination
During our explorations on Mount Wuyi in 2018 and 2019, we collected a Carex with densely hispidulous utricles. The plant was easily recognized as a member of Carex sect. Occlusae C.B. Clarke.
A total of ten populations were examined for morphological analysis, including one population of the new species (Carex borealifujianica), six populations of C. ligulata, and three populations of C. hebecarpa. The specimens are conserved in the following herbaria: Hangzhou Normal College (HTC), South China Botanical Garden (IBSC), Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (PE) and University of Tokyo (TI), and collection information is shown in Table 2.
Morphological observations and statistical analysis
Morphological terminology used in the description of the species mainly follows Dai et al. (2010) and Jiménez-Mejías et al. (2016) [11, 14]. Quantitative characters, including culm height, leaf width, number, length and width of staminate and pistillate spikes, length of peduncle of staminate spike, pistillate flowers per spike, length of pistillate scales, utricle and achenes, were measured on all the samples. The density of utricles was calculated by utricle number per spike length, and the other qualitative characters were directly obtained and assigned by examining specimens. The size measurements of utricles and achenes of each individual were randomly measured from a total of 20 utricles and achenes of different spikes. Eighty individuals and 17 diagnostic characters were analyzed, and all diagnostic characters are presented in Table 3. A data matrix using 17 characters was produced for each population with each individual as an operational taxonomic unit (OTU) (Table 3). SPSS version 11.5 software was used to analyze the variation of quantitative characters, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to determine the similarities among populations based on 17 characters in RStudio [40] using the functions of “scale”, “princomp” and “predict”; a 95% confidence interval was employed using the function “stat_ellipse” in the “ggplot2” package.
SEM observations
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were conducted to compare the detailed micromorphology of utricles and achenes. The utricles and achenes of Carex borealifujianica and the other six species of Carex sect. Occlusae examined were studied from specimens.
Mature utricles were cleaned in 50% ethanol for 2 hr, and air dried. The cleaned utricles were mounted on stubs using double-sided adhesive tape, and coated with a layer of gold [22]. Mature achenes were initially soaked in a solution of concentrated sulfuric acid and acetic anhydride (vol.: vol. = 1: 9) for 12–18 hr, then rinsed in acetic acid for 10 min and water for 5 min, respectively. These samples were placed in a bath-type ultrasonic cleaner for 30 min with 70% ethanol to remove the cuticle and outer periclinal wall of the epidermis [41]. After air drying, the achenes were mounted and coated in a gold layer. The coated utricles and achenes were observed and photographed using an XL-30E scanning electron microscope (Philips, The Netherlands).
Taxon sampling, DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing
A total of 22 samples representing 18 taxa were used for molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the results of the recent global megaphylogeny of Carex [11, 12], which indicated sect. Occlusae was a member of core Carex clade and closely related to sects. Hallerianae, Acrocystis and Clandestinae; 48 sequences were newly generated in this study (including those of 2 species, C. phyllocephala and C. maubertiana, which were sequenced for the first time); the other sequences were directly downloaded from GenBank (see Table 1).
Total genomic DNA was extracted from leaves dried in silica gel using TIANGEN Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). Two nuclear DNA regions (ETS and ITS) and two chloroplast DNA regions (matK and trnL-F) used for phylogenetic analysis, were amplified using a DNA Engine PCR machine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 25 μL reactions. The amplification reaction mixture was prepared using Golden DNA Polymerase following the manufacturer’s instructions (Tiangen Biotech) and the amplified primers followed Starr et al. [42] for ETS, White et al. [43] for ITS, Starr and Ford [44] for matK and Taberlet et al. [45] for trnL-F. The PCR program began at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 37 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C (57°C for ITS) for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a 72°C extension for 10 min. All PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels to verify product size.
The PCR products were purified with an AxyPrep PCR Clean-up Kit (Axygen Biotechnology Co., Hangzhou, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was carried out on an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Molecular phylogenetic analysis
Sequences were aligned using the online version of MAFFT [46], and then manually adjusted by MEGA X [47]. The ETS, ITS, trnL-F and matK were combined in SequenceMatrix [48]. Optimal DNA substitute models for each region were selected using Akaike information criterion [49] in jModeltest v.2.1.3 [50], and resulted in GTR+G for ETS, ITS and trnL-F, GTR+I+G for matK. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in RAxML v. 8 [51] for Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Mrbayes v. 3.2.6 for Bayesian Inference (BI) [52]. For the ML analysis, a bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was conducted with a GTR+G model using other parameters by default. For the Bayesian analysis, four Metropolis-coupled Markov-chains Monte Carlo were run for 107 generations with sampling every 1000 generations and until the standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. The first 2500 recovered trees were discarded (burn in = 0.25). Maximum parsimony bootstrap (BP) and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) were respectively calculated.
Assessment of conservation status
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Categories and Criteria in 2012 was used to assess the conservation status of the new species. We followed the definitions and categories and used the field investigation data to estimate, such as population size, geographic range, and quality of habitat.
Results
Morphological variation within and among populations
The morphological characters we observed and measured are shown in Table 3 (see S1 Data), which indicates that most of the quantitative characters in the analysis are variable both within and across populations. In the PCA analysis, four principal components with eigenvalues >1 were extracted; these explained 39.61%, 19.78%, 11.85% and 6.09% of the variation among individuals, respectively. The first principal component had the highest loadings for leaf sheath indumentum, whether or not utricles had distinct thin veins, leaf width, indumentum of pistillate scales, number of staminate spikes, and density of utricles. The second principal component had the highest loadings for pistillate scale, utricle, and pistillate spike lengths. Based on the PCA of the diagnostic morphological characters, three groups were clearly recognized. The population named FJ-B was isolated from the other nine populations, whereas three populations (SC-H, TI-H and YN-H) formed the second group, close to the third group which included five populations from China (AH-L, FJ-L, HN-L, JX-L, and SCCQ-L) and one from Japan (JA-L). These three groups were identified with the three species Carex borealifujianica, C. hebecarpa, and C. ligulata (Fig 1).
Populations names and detailed information follow Table 1.
One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed among these three groups. Leaf widths of Carex borealifujianica and C. hebecarpa were significantly narrower than that of C. ligulata (4.06±0.12 mm and 4.11±0.30 mm vs. 8.30±0.21 mm, respectively). Utricle densities of C. borealifujianica and C. hebecarpa were significantly sparser than that of C. ligulata (8.45±0.29 /cm and 6.52±0.36 /cm vs. 16.44±0.50 /cm, respectively). Utricle lengths of C. borealifujianica and C. ligulata were longer than that of C. hebecarpa (4.23±0.04 mm and 4.15±0.04 mm vs. 3.46±0.10 mm, respectively). In addition, pistillate scale lengths of C. borealifujianica and C. ligulata were longer than that of C. hebecarpa (2.49±0.04 mm and 2.49±0.04 mm vs. 1.77±0.03 mm, respectively).
Some characters of Carex borealifujianica distinguished it from both C. hebecarpa and C. ligulata, such as indumentum on basal sheaths (pilose vs. glabrous), number of staminate spikes (2 or 3 vs. solitary, respectively), and veins on utricles (conspicuous vs. inconspicuous). From the above-mentioned analysis, the diagnostic characters distinguishing the new species from Carex hebecarpa and C. ligulata are shown in Table 4.
Micromorphology of achenes and utricles
Utricles of all seven species in Carex sect. Occlusae were obovoid (excluding beak), and obtusely trigonous. Five species, C. ligulata, C. hebecarpa, C. maubertiana, C. polycephala and C. borealifujianica have densely hispidulous utricles, whereas the utricles of C. poculisquama were nearly glabrous and those of C. pseudoligulata were glabrous but densely hispidulous on the beak margin. Carex borealifujianica has utricles similar to those of C. ligulata in micromorphology (Fig 2).
Occlusae. A, E, Carex borealifujianica; B, G, C. ligulata; C. C. hebecarpa; D, F, H, C. maubertiana; I, L, C. polycephala; J, M, O, C. poculisquama; K, N, P, C. pseudoligulata. A–D, I–K, overview and shape (scale bar = 1 mm); E, F, L–N, surface indumentum (scale bar = 100 μm); G, H, O, P, beak (scale bar = 100 μm).
Achene shape and surface sculpturing of C. borealifujianica and other six species in sect. Occlusae are shown in Fig 3. The trigonous achenes of most species were broadly obovoid, while those of C. maubertiana were obovoid. Moreover, only C. borealifujianica has achenes emarginate at the apex. The epidermal cells of all samples were irregularly 5–7-gonal, with straight inner anticlinal walls and a single silica body in each cell. Carex borealifujianica has achenes most similar to C. ligulata in micromorphology (Fig 3).
Occlusae. A, B, Carex borealifujianica; C, D, C. ligulata; E, F, C. maubertiana; G, C. hebecarpa; H, C. pseudoligulata; I, J, C. polycephala; K, L, C. poculisquama. A, C, E, I, K, overview and shape (scale bar = 1 mm); B, D, F–H, J, L, epidermal cell shape (scale bar = 10 μm).
Phylogenetic relationships
The combined dataset contained 3057 bp aligned characters with the ETS, ITS, matK and trnL-F containing 616 bp, 628 bp, 776 bp and 1037 bp, respectively. The topologies of BI and ML trees were generally congruent and recovered a similar phylogeny to those of previous studies [11, 12] (Fig 4). Six species in Carex sect. Occlusae clustered together and formed a distinct clade with high support (PP = 1, BS = 100%), which indicated this section is monophyletic. The three individuals of Carex borealifujianica formed a well-supported clade (PP = 1, BS = 100%). Carex ligulata is paraphyletic in a lineage that includes C. hebecarpa, indicating that further studies are required to clarify the relationship between these species.
Values above branches represent bootstrap values (BS) for maximum likelihood and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) respectively, and (-) indicates the BS<50% or PP<0.5.
This study indicated that Carex sect. Occlusae is monophyletic and recovered sister group to sect. Hallerianae (Aschers. & Graebn.) Rouy, which is consistent with previous studies [3, 12]. The results can be more reliable than the findings of previous studies since the additional sampling of sect. Occlusae compared with only two samples previously.
Conclusions
Our study has found the population FJ-B from Fujian in SE China differs from Carex ligulata in several morphological characters and achene micromorphology. It was also found to display a distinct phylogenetic placement. Accordingly, we described it here as a new species.
Carex borealifujianica Y.F. Lu & X.F. Jin, sp. nov. [urn:lsid:ipni.org:names: 77254902–1]. (Figs 2 and 5)
A, habit; B, indumentum on leaf sheath; C, staminate scale; D, pistillate scale; E, utricle; F, achene.
Type. CHINA. Fujian Province: Wuyishan City, Mount Wuyi, Shuiliandong, near Huiyuan Temple, roadside under forest, alt. 320 m, 27°40′38.18″N, 117°57′14.32″E 24 May 2018, X.F. Jin & Y.F. Lu 4176 (holotype: ZM; isotypes: HTC, PE, ZM).
Haec species nova C. ligulatae Nees affinis est, sed foliis 2.5–5 mm latis, vaginis foliis sparse pilosis, spicis staminatis 2 vel 3, anguste clavatis, acheniis apice emarginatis differt.
Herbaceous perennial. Rhizome woody, creeping or obliquely ascending, with many brown, fibrous adventitious roots. Culms loosely caespitose, 35–80 cm tall, acutely trigonous, slender to thick, upper parts scabrous, base with pale brown to dark brown bladeless sheaths. Leaves cauline, shorter than culms, 2.5–5 mm wide, flat, scabrous on both surfaces; sheaths not overlapping, 5–10 cm long, sparsely pubescent on the surface, but densely on the angles. Bracts leaf-like; lowermost 2 or 3 bracts shorter than inflorescence, with a 7–23 mm long sheathing base; upper ones longer or equaling the inflorescence, with a 3–5 mm long sheathing base or sheathless. Spikes 4–8, sparse in the base of the inflorescence, aggregated in the apex of the inflorescence; terminal staminate spikes 3 (rarely 2), narrowly clavate, 4–15 mm long, 1–1.5 mm wide; others pistillate, cylindrical, 1–3.6 cm long, 3.8–4.2 mm wide, ± densely flowered; lower peduncles extending to the apex of the bract sheaths, the upper ones enclosed. Staminate scales elliptic, yellowish brown, 4.5–5.5 mm long, apex obtuse, with yellow 1-veined costa excurrent into a 0.5–0.7 mm long scabrous awn. Pistillate scales ovate, pale brown to pale yellow, 2.5–2.8 mm long, apex mucronate, with green 3-veined costa. Utricles nearly erect or slightly patent, obovoid, obtusely trigonous, pale brownish green, longer than pistillate scales, 3.8–4.2 mm long, densely whitish hispidulous, lower part with 7 or 8 veins, base attenuate and short-stipitate, apex abruptly contracted into a 1–1.5 mm long erect beak, orifice with 2 short teeth. Achenes tightly enveloped by utricles, obovoid, trigonous, brown, 1.8–2.2 mm long, base short-stipitate, apex emarginate; style erect, base slightly thickened; stigmas 3.
Etymology. The specific epithet ‘borealifujianica’ refers to the type locality of this new species, Mount Wuyi, located in North Fujian Province.
Phenology. Flowering and fruiting from early May to mid-June.
Distribution and habitat. Carex borealifujianica is known only from the type locality (Fig 6). It grows on slopes, under forests or by streams at 220–320 m a.s.l.
(Map source: https://www.webmap.cn/main.do?method=index; the distribution information is from collection notes of the specimens stored in ANUB, CDBI, HHBG, HNWP, HTC, IBK, KUN, LBG, NAS, PE, SZ, WUK and ZM).
Additional specimens examined. China. Fujian Province: Wuyishan City, Mount Wuyishan, Dawangfeng, on slope, alt. 220 m, 27°40′56.23″’N, 117°58′32.05″E, 23 May 2018, X.F. Jin & Y.F. Lu 4159 (HTC, ZM), 4160 (KUN, PE, ZM), 4161 (KUN, PE, ZM); the same locality, under forest, alt. 247 m, Y.F. Lu 177 (KUN, ZM), 178 (HTC, KUN, ZM), 179 (KUN, PE, ZM).
Conservation status: Vulnerable, VU B2ab(iii) (IUCN 2012). The occupancy of Carex borealifujianica is known to be less than 2000 km2, and it is distributed in no more than 10 locations. The quality of the habitat is continuously declining due to the disturbance caused by local tea plantation and tourism [53].
Key to the species in Carex sect. Occlusae from China (mainly modified from Flora of China [14]).
- 1a. Spikes approximate, usually aggregated at top of culm, subcapitately disposed; bracts aggregated.
- 2a. Culms 12–15 cm tall; leaf blade 2–5 mm wide; utricles 2.3–2.5 mm long, ciliate on margins of beak…………………………….……………………….1. C. pseudophyllocephala L.K. Dai
- 2b. Culms 20–60 cm tall; leaf blade 8–15 mm wide; utricles 2.8–3.5 mm long, densely hispidulous……………………………………………….….2. C. phyllocephala T. Koyama
- 1b. Spikes remote, racemosely disposed; bracts sparsely disposed.
- 3a. Pistillate scales connate at base; pistillate spikes with sparse utricles; utricles subrhombic, trigonous, 5–5.3 mm long………………………………………………3. C. poculisquama Kük.
- 3b. Pistillate scales not connate; pistillate spikes with dense utricles; utricles ovoid or obovoid, obtusely trigonous, 3–4.8 mm long.
- 4a. Leaf blade 2–4 mm wide; pistillate spikes 3–4 mm wide; utricles sparsely disposed, subdistichous.
- 5a. Staminate spikes 4–7.5 cm long; staminate scales oblanceolate, 7–8.5 mm long; utricles 3–3.6 mm long, glabrous…………………………………..4. C. nodosa S.R. Zhang et al.
- 5b. Staminate spikes 1.5–2.5 cm long; staminate scales broadly obovate, 1.5–2 mm long; utricles 3–3.2 mm long, densely hispidulous……………………5. C. hebecarpa C.A. May.
- 4b. Leaf blade 2.5–15 mm wide; pistillate spikes 3.8–6 mm wide; utricles densely disposed, multiseriate.
- 6a. Utricles 3–5 mm long, densely hispidulous.
- 7a. Leaf sheaths not overlapping, sheaths rather loosely enveloping culms; utricles 3.8–5 mm long.
- 8a. Leaf blade 2.5–5 mm wide, sheaths sparsely pilose; staminate spikes 2 or 3, clavate; achenes emarginate at apex………5. C. borealifujianica Y.F. Lu & X.F. Jin
- 8b. Leaf blade 5–15 mm wide, sheaths glabrous; staminate spike solitary, cylindrical; achenes acute at apex…………………………………………6. C. ligulata Nees
- 7b. Leaf sheaths overlapping, sheaths tightly enveloping culms; utricles 3–3.2 mm long…………………………………………………….….7. C. maubertiana Boott
- 7a. Leaf sheaths not overlapping, sheaths rather loosely enveloping culms; utricles 3.8–5 mm long.
- 6b. Utricles 3–3.5 mm long, hispidulous on upper margins and veins….….9. C. pseudoligulata L.K. Dai
- 6a. Utricles 3–5 mm long, densely hispidulous.
- 4a. Leaf blade 2–4 mm wide; pistillate spikes 3–4 mm wide; utricles sparsely disposed, subdistichous.
Supporting information
S1 Data. The original data of the observed and measured morphological characters for the principal component analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264419.s001
(CSV)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Prof. Wen-Tsai Wang for his modifying the Latin diagnosis, to Dr. Anton Reznicek for his great improvement of the quality of our text, to Prof. Bing-Yang Ding, Mr. Jian-Sheng Wang, Mr. Tong-Jun Liang, Mr. Bi-Cheng Hu and Ms. Ling-Xian Chen for their assistance during the field trips, to Dr. Hiroshi Ikeda and Prof. Yun-Fei Deng for providing some materials, and to the curators of the herbaria HTC, IBSC, PE and TI for permitting visit by the authors.
References
- 1. Govaerts R, Jiménez‐Mejías P, Koopman J, Simpson D, Goetghebeur P, Wilson K, et al. World Checklist of Cyperaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2020; http://wcsp.science.kew.org/
- 2.
Egorova TV. The Sedges (Carex L.) of Russia and adjacent States (within the limits of the former URSS). St.-Petersburg: St.-Petersburg State Chemical-Pharmaceutical Academy. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. 1999; 1–772.
- 3. Roalson EH, Jiménez‐Mejías P, Hipp AL, Benítez‐Benítez C, Bruederle LP, Chung KS, et al. 2021. A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles. J Syst Evol. 59: 726–762.
- 4. Larridon I, Zuntini AR, Léveillé‐Bourret É, Barrett RL, Starr JR, Muasya M, et al. 2021. A new classification of Cyperaceae (Poales) supported by phylogenomic data. J Syst Evol. 59: 852–895.
- 5. Ford BA, Starr JR, Nguyen TKT, Vu AT. Two extraordinary new Pseudopetiolate Carex species from Vietnam (sect. Hemiscaposae, Cyperaceae). Syst Bot. 2017; 42(3): 402–417.
- 6.
Jin XF, Zhang SR. Flora of Pan-Himalaya 12(2) Cyperaceae II. Science Press, Beijing. 2020; pp. 1–421.
- 7. Waterway MJ, Hoshino T, Masaki T. Phylogeny, species richness, and ecological specialization in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae. Bot Rev. 2009; 75(1): 138–159.
- 8. Yano O, Ikeda H, Jin XF, Hoshino T. Phylogeny and chromosomal variations in East Asian Carex, Siderostictae group (Cyperaceae), based on DNA sequences and cytological data. J Plant Res. 2014; 127(1): 99–107. pmid:23857080
- 9. Starr JR, Janzen FH, Ford BA. Three new, early diverging Carex (Cariceae, Cyperaceae) lineages from East and Southeast Asia with important evolutionary and biogeographic implications. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2015; 88: 105–120. pmid:25858558
- 10. Global Carex Group. Making Carex monophyletic (Cyperaceae, tribe Cariceae): a new broader circumscription. Bot J Linn Soc. 2015; 179: 1–42.
- 11. Jiménez-Mejías P, Hahn M, Lueders K, Starr JR, Brown BH, Chouinard BN, et al. Megaphylogenetic Specimen-level Approaches to the Carex (Cyperaceae) Phylogeny Using ITS, ETS, and matK Sequences: Implications for Classification. Syst Bot. 2016; 41(3): 500–518.
- 12. Martín-Bravo S, Jiménez-Mejías P, Villaverde T, Escudero M, Hahn M, Spalink D, et al. A tale of worldwide success: Behind the scenes of Carex (Cyperaceae) biogeography and diversification. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 2019; 57(6): 695–718.
- 13. Villaverde T, Jiménez-Mejías P, Luceño M, Waterway MJ, Kim S, Lee B, et al. A new classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) subgenera supported by a HybSeq backbone phylogenetic tree. Bot J Linn Soc. 2020; 194(2): 141–163.
- 14.
Dai LK, Liang SY, Zhang SR, Tang YC, Koyama T, Tucker GC. Carex L. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY (eds) Flora of China v 23. Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. 2010; pp. 285–461.
- 15. Chen WJ, Jin XF. Carex huangshanica (sect. Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Anhui, eastern China. Phytotaxa. 2015; 233(3): 281–287.
- 16. Jin XF, Cen JM, Hahn M, Lu YF, He JJ. Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China (II): a taxonomic revision of sect. Radicales (Kük.) Nelmes. Phytotaxa. 2015; 217(2): 117–132.
- 17. Jin XF, Chen WJ, Cen JM. Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China (III): the description of four new species. Phytotaxa. 2015; 231(2): 165–174.
- 18. Jin XF, Liu YD, Lu YF, Sun WY, Wang H. Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China (VI): the identity of Carex retrofracta Kuk. (sect. Confertiflorae). Phytotaxa. 2020; 429(2): 135–147.
- 19. Jin XF, Simpson DA, Zheng CZ, Sun L, Zhang HW. Carex paracheniana (Carex sect. Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Guangxi and Guizhou, China. Syst Bot. 2012; 37(4): 929–937.
- 20. Jin XF, Zhao YJ, Zheng CZ, Zhang HW. Carex zhejiangensis sp. nov. (Cyperaceae) from Zhejiang, eastern China. Nord J Bot. 2011; 29(1): 63–70.
- 21. Jin XF, Zheng CZ. Carex yandangshanica sp. nov. (Cyperaceae; C. sect. Rhomboidales) from Zhejiang, China. Nord J Bot. 2010; 28(6): 709–712.
- 22.
Jin XF, Zheng CZ. Taxonomy of Carex sect. Rhomboidales (Cyperaceae). Science Press, Beijing. 2013; pp. 1–237.
- 23. Jin XF. Taxonomic revision of Carex chungii (Cyperaceae; sect. Mitratae) and allied species. Phytotaxa. 2017; 317(1): 29–41.
- 24. Lu YF, Jin XF. Carex sinosupina sp. nov. (sect. Lamprochlaenae, Cyperaceae) from Gansu, north central China. Nord J Bot. 2017; 35(5): 573–577.
- 25. Lu YF, Jin XF. Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China (V): new species, combination and subspecies from Zhejiang. Phytotaxa. 2018; 372(3): 203–211.
- 26. Lu ZC, Su YL, Lu YF, Jin XF. Carex pingleensis (Carex sect. Mitratae), a new species of Cyperaceae from Guangxi, China. Taiwania. 2020; 65(3): 391–395.
- 27. Wang QL, Yang HB, Deng YF, Wang ZN, Liu GD. Carex longipetiolata (Cyperaceae), a new sedge from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa. 2012; 75: 65–69.
- 28. Yang HB, Li XX, Bai CJ, Wang WQ, Liu GD. Carex concava (Carex sect. Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa. 2016; 283(2): 155–162.
- 29. Yang HB, Li XX, Bai CJ, Wang WQ, Wang QL, Yu DG, et al. Carex procumbens (Carex sect. Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa. 2015; 201(3): 207–213.
- 30. Yang HB, Li XX, Wang WQ, Bai CJ, Liu GD. Carex jianfengensis (Carex sect. Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. Plos One. 2015; 10(9). pmid:26397809
- 31. Yang HB, Liu GD. Carex ledongensis (Cyperaceae), a new sedge from Hainan Isl. of South China. Phytotaxa. 2020; 461(2): 72–78.
- 32. Yang HB, Wang QL, Bai CJ, Li XX, Liu GD. Carex diaoluoshanica (Carex sect. Lageniformes, Cyperaceae), a New Species from Hainan, China. Plos One. 2014; 9(6). pmid:24937208
- 33. Yang HJ, Xu H, Deng YF, Li YD. Carex xueyingiana (Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan Island, China. Phytotaxa. 2017; 308(2): 239–248.
- 34. Zhang SR, Zhang J, Liu ZY, Qu S, Han RG. Carex nodosa (Cyperaceae), a new species of C. sect. Occlusae from southwest China. Nord J Bot. 2018; 36(8).
- 35. Zhao LQ, Yang J, Niu JM, Zhang Q. Carex helingeeriensis (Cyperaceae), a new species from Inner Mongolia, China. Ann Bot Fenn. 2013; 50(1–2): 32–34.
- 36. Zhao YJ, Shen TT, Zheng Y, Chen ZL, Jin XF. Carex dapanshanica sp. nov. (C. sect. Mitratae, Cyperaceae) from Zhejiang, China. Nord J Bot. 2011; 29(6): 670–673.
- 37. Zhou YY, Jin XF. Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China: three new species. Phytotaxa. 2014; 164(2): 133–140.
- 38. Deng YF. Carex longicolla (Cyperaceae), a new sedge from China. Phytotaxa. 2014; 178(3): 181–188.
- 39. Chen CD. Biodiversity in the Wuyi Mountains and its importance in China. Chinese Biodiversity. 1999; 7(4): 320–326.
- 40.
RStudio Team. 2016. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
- 41. Jin XF, Zhou YY, Hipp A, Jin SH, Oda J, Ikeda H, et al. Nutlet micromorphology of Carex section Rhomboidales sensu Kükenthal (Cyperaceae) and its systematic implications. Bot J Linn Soc. 2014; 175(1): 123–143.
- 42. Starr JR, Harris SA, Simpson DA. Potential of the 5 ’ and 3 ’ ends of the intergenic spacer (IGS) of rDNA in the Cyperaceae: New sequences for lower-level phylogenies in sedges with an example from Uncinia pers. Int J Plant Sci. 2003; 164(2): 213–227.
- 43.
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols, a guide to methods and applications. Academic, San Diego. 1990; pp. 315–322.
- 44. Starr JR, Ford BA. Phylogeny and evolution in Cariceae (Cyperaceae): Current knowledge and future directions. Bot Rev. 2009; 75(1): 110–137.
- 45. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol. 1991; 17(5): 1105–1109. pmid:1932684
- 46. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(4): 1160–1166. pmid:28968734
- 47. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018; 35(6): 1547–1549. pmid:29722887
- 48. Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 2011; 27(2): 171–180. pmid:34875773
- 49.
Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F (eds) Kiado Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai, Budapest. 1973; pp. 267–281.
- 50. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(8): 772. pmid:22847109
- 51. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(9): 1312–1313. pmid:24451623
- 52. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst Biol. 2012; 61(3): 539–542. pmid:22357727
- 53.
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2012). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Vers. 3.1, 2nd ed. IUCN, Gland & Cambridge.