Skip to main content

Stigmas of holoparasitic Phelipanche arenaria (Orobanchaceae) – a suitable ephemeric flower habitat for development unique microbiome

Abstract

Background

Microbial communities have occasionally been observed in part of the ephemeric reproductive structure of floral stigmas, but their prevalence, phylogenetic diversity and ecological roles are understudied. This report describes the first study of bacterial and fungal communities in immature and mature stigma tissue of the endangered holoparasitic plant Phelipanche arenaria. Culture-dependent methods coupled with next-generation sequencing indicated that a small surface of the flower stigma was an unexpectedly rich and diverse microhabitat for colonization of microbial. We also compared the enzymatic activity of the bacterial communities between immature and mature stigmas samples.

Results

Using high-throughput sequencing methods, we identified and classified 39 to over 51 OTUs per sample for bacterial OTUs represented by Pantoea agglomerans and P. ananatis, comprising 50.6%, followed by Pseudomonas, Luteibacter spp., Sphingomonas spp. with 17% of total frequency. The bacterial profile of immature stigmas of P. arenaria contained unique microorganisms (21 of the most numerous OTUs) that were not confirmed in mature stigmas. However, the enzymatic activity of bacteria in mature stigmas of P. arenaria showed more activity than observed in immature stigmas. In the fungal profile, we recorded even 80 OTUs in mature stigmas, consisting of Capnodiales 45.03% of the total abundance with 28.27% of frequency was created by Alternaria eichhorniae (10.55%), Mycosphaerella tassiana (9.69%), and Aureobasidium pullulans (8.03%). Additionally, numerous putative plant growth-promoting bacteria, fungal pathogens and pathogen-antagonistic yeasts were also detected.

Conclusions

Our study uncovered that P. arenaria stigmas host diverse bacterial and fungal communities. These microorganisms are well known and have been described as beneficial for biotechnological and environmental applications (e.g., production of different enzymes and antimicrobial compounds). This research provided valuable insight into the parasitic plant–microbe interactions.

Peer Review reports

Background

The stigma is a specialised tissue with a key structure in plant reproduction and an ephemeral nature. Stigmas, along with other structures of flowers, are transient organs and normally are classified into two groups: wet and dry stigmas. This division depends on whether they possess a surface secretion [1, 2]. These are female tissues with receptive portions that intercept pollen and initiate pollen tube growth towards the ovary. Of many different flower organs, stigmas with colour and structure modifications are attractive to pollinators and contribute to pollination success [3,4,5]. Therefore, the stigma as a part of the gynoecium plays a key role in pollination, fertilization and seed set. These reproductive organs of plants are nutrient-rich and contain proteins, lipids, polysaccharides and other ingredients; thus, they are an important nutrient source for microorganisms [2, 6]. Stigmatic exudates show significant activity in terms of the number of processes and functions in which they participate [7, 8].

Investigations and interest in flower-associated microbiota are related to whole flower analysis and individual parts or structures (nectar, petal, pistil, stigma, pollen and seeds) [9,10,11,12]. Many studies have been published in the last years mainly focused on nectar microbial communities and comparison of microbial communities in different floral organs and floral rewards (pollen, nectar) [13,14,15,16,17]. The plant species and pollination type significantly influenced the structure and diversity of the pollen microbiota. The insect-pollinated species possessed more similar microorganisms in comparison to the wind-pollinated ones [16]. Yeasts occurred regularly in the floral nectar (between 32 and 44% of all nectar samples contained yeasts) and their abundance in samples were directly correlated with the proportion of pollinators [18]. However, compared to other flower structures, the analysis of the microbial communities in the stigmas is very poorly understood, especially when it comes to rare plant species. It is possible that microbiota also support plant growth and/or plant development, and reducing disease, and in conferring increased survival, as well as contribute to the adaptation of rare and endangered plants to the environment through nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, or phytohormone production [19,20,21]. Without this research it is difficult to validate what role these microorganisms can play in the biology of these plant species. In addition, few studies indicate that it is possible to use microbes to protect endangered plant populations in the field, which in the future may help protect them from the extinction [19].

One of the most important stigma-infecting microorganisms in apple and pear diseases is the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, which causes fire blight [22,23,24]. The occurrence and development of pathogens lead to impaired morphology of female reproductive organs and, as a consequence, to failure of sexual reproduction (even shifts in sex ratios to nearly 100% phenotypically hermaphroditic) [25,26,27]. Some of them colonize stigmas as a pathway to infect seeds (e.g., Acidovorax citrulli in cucurbits, Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi on blueberry) [28, 29]. However, little is known about how stigma microbial communities can influence disease and reproductive success of plants. It may also depend on the analyzed plant species and climatic conditions (mainly temperature and humidity). Research has demonstrated that microorganisms are transferred from blossoms to fruits, and this transfer is most pronounced during the growth and maturation of the fruit [30]. The microbiome present in flowers has an impact on floral rewards, which are significant for pollination and, consequently, for the reproductive process [31]. The results of these studies may provide a promising prospect for the biological control of diseases, because microorganisms associated with flowers are known to be related to plant health and fitness [32, 33].

For our research, we chose Phelipanche arenaria (Borkh.) Pomel (syn. Orobanche arenaria Borkh.), sand broomrape, an obligate parasite belonging to the family Orobanchaceae. Orobanchaceae is the largest parasitic flowering plant family, with 102 genera and over 2100 species [34]. The main lineages of Orobancheae are widely distributed, with the main centres of their biodiversity and origin being the Mediterranean Basin and Western Asia [35]. Holoparasitic Orobanche s.l. species (broomrapes) are chlorophyll-lacking root parasites of cultivated crops and wild plants. However, the majority of species are rare and threatened with extinction. Orobanche L. and Phelipanche Pomel are the largest root-holoparasitic genera and together comprise ca. 200 species. Orobanchaceae is one of the most critical families of flora worldwide and is notoriously difficult to determine. This is caused by greatly reduced vegetative organs and high morphological variability, which is associated with their heterotrophic lifestyle [36, 37].

Previous studies have documented the microbial diversity of parasitic plants in relation to their negative effects on host crop plants [38,39,40]. However, most of them comprise species that are rare and endangered, as well as keystone components of natural ecosystems [41]. The occurrence of endophytic microbiota in seeds has a functional effect on the specialized seed germination mechanisms of parasitic species with their hosts (P. ramosa (L.) Pomel vs. tomato, rape, tobacco, and hemp) [39]. These microorganisms were recorded as plant growth-promoting species and resistant to environmental conditions [39, 40, 42]. Moreover, an exchange of endophytes between the parasite and the host showed that the parasitic plant microbiome is obtained but distinct from the host plant microbiota (P. aegyptiaca (Pers.) Pomel vs. tomato and O. hederae Vaucher ex Duby vs. ivy) [38, 43]. Higher humidity and a rich source of nutrients are important habitats for microorganisms (bacteria and yeasts) in the floral nectar of P. ramosa and O. rapum-genistae Thuill [15]. The investigation of microbial communities in parasitic plants with their hosts is an alternative and environmentally friendly method for parasitic weed control. Parasites can be considered keystone species because they can influence not only individual species’ growth, reproduction or allometry but also ecosystems or communities, such as ecosystem engineers, through their effects on abiotic environments and trophic interactions with other organisms [44] (e.g., pollinators, herbivores, microorganisms, nonhost plants).

The aim of this study was to describe the bacterial and fungal communities of P. arenaria stigmas using molecular and culture methods. Moreover, these microbial communities were sampled from immature stigmas from closed flower buds and mature stigmas from opened flowers to study how they change during flower development and exposure to the environment. Additionally, these data shed light on how plant-associated microbiota are formed through the unique ecology and heterotrophic life strategy of parasitic plants. We also discussed about the potential roles of the recorded microorganisms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to characterize microbial communities of stigmas of parasitic plant species using both molecular and culture methods.

Results

The characteristic of bacteria and fungi isolated from plant tissue

As a result of inoculation dilutions of the stigmas' suspension on microbiological media, mixed cultures of microorganisms were obtained. To eliminate the repetition of the same strains in the molecular identification kit, the isolates were subjected to the microscopic observation of cells/spores and the observation of colony morphology. Based on morphology and microscopic features, nine bacterial isolates of immature stigmas were selected and identified with Sanger sequencing: Bacillus megaterium, Microbacterium testaceum, Pantoea agglomerans, Rahnella victoriana, R. variigena, Rhodococcus corynebacterioides. Moreover, we recorded the eight bacterial and three fungal isolates of mature stigmas, which were the most numerous in mixed culture and were morphologically different from each other. These strains were isolated and identified: P. agglomerans, Pseudomonas cedrina, P. gessardii, P. lurida, Sphingomonas aquatilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Beauveria bassiana, Fusarium avenaceum, Cladosporium subuliforme (Figs. 1 and 2). Bacteria belonging to the genera Pantoea (yellow colonies), Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas grew on TSA and YPG culture medium (Fig. 3b). Orange colonies of Sphingomonas aquatilis dominated on Rose Bengal Agar (Fig. 3a). The Beauveria bassiana fungus (Fig. 3c), which did not grow on other media, grew profusely on YPG. Specimens representing the species Fusarium avenaceum, and C. subuliforme grew on Rose Bengal Agar (Fig. 3d). The total number of bacteria inhabiting the mature stigmas was 5.84 ± 0.02 log CFU·g−1 and fungi 3.94 ± 0.03 log CFU·g−1 (mean ± SD) while on the immature stigmas was 5.14 ± 0.03 log CFU·g−1 bacteria, fungi were absent.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequences demonstrated for the identified strains of bacteria compared to other strains. The bar indicates sequence divergence. The black rectangle marks bacteria that colonized immature stigmas from closed flowers (green dots) and mature stigmas from opened flowers (red dots). The potentially pathogenic (down arrow) and beneficial effect (up arrow) of microorganisms on plants were presented. PAB – identified strains of bacteria

Fig. 2
figure 2

A phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences demonstrated for the identified strains of fungi compared to other strains. The bar indicates sequence divergence. The black rectangle marks fungi that colonized mature stigmas from opened flowers (red dots). The potentially pathogenic (down arrow) and beneficial effect (up arrow) of microorganisms on plants were presented

Fig. 3
figure 3

Selected colonies of culturable bacteria and fungi. a orange colonies of Sphingomonas aquatilis (Rose Bengal Agar), b bacterial isolates grown on the Trypticase Soy Agar, dominant: 1. Pantoea agglomerans. 2. Pseudomonas lurida. 3. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, c Beauveria bassiana grown on Yeast Extract–Peptone–Glycerol Agar, with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteria nearby, d Fusarium avenaceum (on the left) and Cladosporium sp. (on the right) on the Rose Bengal Agar

The characteristic of stigmas microbial communities

Quality filtering recovered a total of 61 578 16S rRNA reads of bacteria and 13 863 ITS reads of fungi from stigma samples. The microbiota analysis of the examined stigma allowed us to identify 39 to over 51 OTUs per sample for bacteria and similar value was recorded between immature and mature stigmas (41 vs. 39). In contrast to the fungal community colonizing the stigmas, where only two OTUs were recorded in immature stigmas, however in mature stigmas observed even 80 OTUs (Table 1).

Table 1 OTUs and diversity indices of microbiota identified in Phelipanche arenaria (PA) stigmas

Analysis of the composition of bacteria of stigmas allowed us to identify bacteria representing 34 most numerous OTUs (Table 2), such as eudominant Pantoea agglomerans and P. ananatis, comprising 50.6% of the total amount. The next most abundant OTUs ranked were Pseudomonas, Luteibacter spp., and Sphingomonas spp. with 17% of total frequency. The bacterial communities that colonized the stigmas at different stages of development show differences within the eudominats. P. agglomerans predominates in immature stigmas, while P. ananatis in mature stigmas. In addition, the bacterial profile of immature stigmas of P. arenaria contained unique microorganisms (21 of the most numerous OTUs) that were not identified in mature stigmas sample, e.g.: Luteibacter spp., Rhodococcus corynebacterioides, Serratia spp., and Pseudomonas rhizosphaerae. However, in mature stigmas were recorded only P. ananatis, P. fragi, Xanthomonadaceae, Rhizobiaceae and Paenibacillus spp.. Additionally, we observed that during the development of stigmas, some frequency of bacteria decreased in mature stigmas e.g.: in P. agglomerans (from 47.43 to 0.06%), Sphingomonas spp. (5.36 vs. 0.27%), Chryseobacterium spp. (2.01 vs. 0.04%), as well as higher amounts reported in Pseudomonas spp. (from 5.09 to 12.70%), Enterobacteriaceae (0.68 vs. 5.67%), Stenotrophomonas spp. (0.07 vs. 5.74%), and Pedobacter spp. (0.06 vs. 2.55%).

Table 2 Frequency (%) of bacteria identified in Phelipanche arenaria (PA) stigmas

In this study, the fungal composition of associated with stigmas of P. arenaria is more diverse that the bacterial, although in immature stigmas of P. arenaria contained only two OTUs – Blumeria spp. (87.5% of the total) and Alternaria spp. (12.5%). Thus, the fungal profile of mature stigmas includes a series of microorganisms – 16 most numerous OTUs (Table 3), where the eudominant is Capnodiales (45.03% of the total abundance). The other 28.27% of frequency was created by Alternaria eichhorniae (10.55%), Mycosphaerella tassiana (9.69%), and Aureobasidium pullulans (8.03%).

Table 3 Frequency (%) of fungi identified in Phelipanche arenaria (PA) stigmas

Furthermore, the frequency of bacterial microbiota was significantly different between the immature and mature stigmas in P. agglomerans and P. ananatis (Fisher's exact test p < 0.0001), as well as Stenotrophomonas spp. (p < 0.014 and p < 0.029) of all examined samples. For Pseudomonas spp., Luteibacter spp., Sphingomonas spp., Serratia spp., and Enterobacteriaceae statistically significant results were also obtained in most of the analyzed samples (Table 2). Due to the presence of only two fungal taxa (only in immature stigmas PA2 sample) compared to the 17 identified OTUs in the PA1 sample, a large part of the results were statistically significant. Based on Fisher's exact test, it was observed that OTUs below 4.62% were not significantly different from each other. Nevertheless, a very strong Blumeria spp. eudominance was noted in the PA2 sample, which was not present in any of the other samples. On the other hand, in immature and mature stigmas there was OTU Alternaria sp., other than A. eichhorniae, characteristic only for mature stigmas (Table 3).

Agglomerative hierarchical clustering analysis of microbial communities divided the samples of the stigma into two main clades for bacteria and fungi (Fig. 4). The mature stigmas were separated from immature stigmas, suggesting clear distinctions of bacterial community structure among PA1 and PA2-PA4 samples. Contrary to fungi where a sample of mature stigmas (PA1) forms a common group with one sample of immature stigmas (PA2). It should be noted that this connection is due to the presence of only two fungal OTUs in one of the three samples of mature stigmas.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Agglomerative Hierarchy Clustering analysis (Bray‒Curtis method) of distance between phyla and order representing microbial communities inhabiting Phelipanche arenaria (PA) stigmas. Immature stigmas from closed flowers (2–4) and mature stigmas from opened flowers (1) (fungi on the right, bacteria on the left)

By using the principal component analysis (PCA), we decomposed the data on microbial communities and diversity indices into two factors that explained 89.65% of the variance (Fig. 5a). Sample of mature stigmas of P. arenaria was correlated with Stenotrophomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp., P. fragi, Pantoea ananatis, Xanthomonadaceae, Rhizobiaceae, Pedobacter spp. and Paenibacillus spp. with diversity and OTUs indices of fungi. These stigmas were correlated negatively with Enterobacteriaceae. Unlike samples of immature stigmas were influenced with several bacterial genera: Luteibacter, Sphingomonas, Chryseobacterium, Pseudarthrobacter, Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum, Duganella, Massilia, Variovorax, Aeromicrobium, Aureimonas, Xylophilus, Microbacteriaceae, Blastococcus, Nocardioides, Enhydrobacter, Skermanella, and Corynebacterium, as well as Pseudomonas tolaasii, P. rhizosphaerae, and Lactobacillus curvatus with fungal genus—Blumeria and diversity and evenness indices of bacteria. Furthermore, due to the presence of only two OTUs of fungal microorganisms observed in immature stigmas, the PCA showed correlation with all numerous OTUs recorded in mature stigmas (Fig. 5a). Moreover, we decomposed the data of biochemical potential of identified microorganisms vs. diversity indices into two factors that explained 86.28% of the variance (Fig. 5b). The mature stigmas were strongly correlated with N-acetyl-glucosamine, N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, valine arylamidase, leucine arylamidase and malic acid with diversity and OTUs indices of fungi. Additionally, the biochemical factors like, D-mannitol, potassium nitrate (nitrate reduction), Naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, ß-glucosidase, D-glucose (fermentation), D-mannose, potassium gluconate, ß-galactosidase and evenness indices of fungi were also correlated with mature stigmas. Samples of immature stigmas were influenced by cystine arylamidase, phosphatase alkaline and α-glucosidase with diversity and evenness indices of bacteria (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the data on microbial communities and diversity indices (a) and the data of biochemical potential of identified microorganisms vs. diversity indices (b) of the immature (PA2-PA4) and mature stigma (PA1) Phelipanche arenaria samples. The lines represent the correlation coefficient between the principal component scores and each of the factors. a Set I included: Paenibacillus spp., Rhizobiaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Pseudomonas fragi, Pantoea ananatis, Hannaella coprosmae, Chaetosphaeronema sp., Alternaria eichhorniae, Mycosphaerellaceae, Gibberella tricincta, Filobasidium wieringae, Sarocladium strictum, Aureobasidium pullulans, Mycosphaerella tassiana, Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota, Capnodiales, Fungi, Phoma sp.. Set II included: Sphingomonas spp., Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum sp., Evenness-b, Xylophilus sp., Chryseobacterium spp, Massilia sp., Pseudarthrobacter sp., Diversity-b, Duganella sp., Nocardioides sp., Microbacteriaceae. Set III included: Pseudomonas tolaasii, Aeromicrobium spp., Luteibacter spp., Variovorax sp., Aureimonas spp. b Set I included: N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase, α-galactosidase, valine arylamidase, leucine arylamidase, malic acid. Set II included: potassium nitrate (nitrate reduction), Naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, D-glucose (fermentation), potassium gluconate, ß-galactosidase and evenness indices of fungi. Set III included: cystine arylamidase, phosphatase alkaline and α-glucosidase

The bacterial and fungal profile of P. arenaria was different in immature and mature stigmas. The indicators used (the Simpson's dominance, Shannon diversity) presented a greater diversity of bacteria in the case of immature stigmas as compared to mature stigmas, although the values were similar (λ = 0.26 vs. 0.39 and H ‘ = 2.24 vs. 1.57). Additionally, the Pielou's evenness index for bacteria was also slightly higher (J ‘ = 0.60 vs. 0.43) in the case of immature stigmas, which proved a more even proportion of these microorganisms. Determining only two OTUs of fungal microorganisms in immature stigmas undoubtedly influenced the values of the indicators. In relation to mature stigmas, the value of the domination index was respectively higher (λ = 0.78 vs. 0.23) and the value of the diversity index was lower (H ‘ = 0.38 vs. 2.23). Interestingly, a similar value of the evenness index (J ‘ = 0.54 vs. 0.51) was obtained between immature and mature stigmas (Table 1).

Heat-map and the left hierarchical dendrogram analysis were used to compare the enzymatic activity of the bacterial communities between immature and mature stigmas samples (Fig. 6). The heat-map analysis showed differences between the samples and allowed us to separate significantly different groups. The enzymatic activity of microorganisms in mature stigmas of P. arenaria was different and showed more activity to that observed in immature stigmas. The conducted analysis proved that it was similar to one of mature stigmas samples (PA3), but it differed significantly in relation to the other two samples of immature stigmas (PA2 and PA4).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Heatmap Cluster Analysis of the normalized data: potential biochemical activity expressed by microbial communities between immature and mature stigmas samples of Phelipanche arenaria. The increase in the relative content of the potential biochemical activity is represented by a transition from green to black to red, as shown in the legend

Discussion

Identification and phylogenetic characterization of isolated cultures of microorganisms

We used the traditional method, i.e., the cultivation method (isolated from plants, bacteria and fungi grown on microbiological media) and the direct method (culture independent). Both procedures generated consistent results for the most abundant taxa (in case of mature stigmas) or were partially compatible (in case of immature stigmas). Sequences classified into four genera, Pantoea, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas, dominated the total read number (in the analysed microbial community from mature stigmas). Additionally, on culture media, these groups of bacteria grew most prolifically (Fig. 3b). However, the limitation of the culture study was significant. Only eight bacterial strains and three strains of fungi were detected on microbiological media (mature stigmas). Direct analysis of the plant material in terms of microorganism presence revealed another numerous and diverse groups of bacteria and fungi (observed in both, mature and immature). The reproducibility of the bacterial taxa detected was limited for immature stigmas tested by culture and nonculture methods. Only Pantoea agglomerans and Rhodococcus corynebacterioides were detected in culture and through next generation sequencing. No fungi were grown in laboratory culture from immature stigmas, and only two taxa were determined by direct nonculture analysis (and only in one of three samples). The culture method was insufficient to assess the microbial profile of the environmental matrix, as most bacteria and fungi did not grow on media in the laboratory [45]. It might be that the strains that grew on media in the laboratory did not constitute the dominant group realistically inhabiting the habitat under study. The most abundant strains present in the habitat likely could not grow on the media. However, our studies for mature stigmas indicate the same dominant bacterial species or genera (Table 3, Supplementary file 1). In the case of immature stigmas, there was only partial agreement. The advantage of the culture method, however, is the assessment of the viability of the isolated strains and the possibility of isolating strains for subsequent analyses or applications (e.g., Beauveria bassiana or Pseudomonas bacteria as a component of biopesticides) [46, 47].

Stigmas of Phelipanche arenaria were colonized by pathogenic and nonpathogenic, also potentially beneficial microorganisms. Pseudomonas lurida is a fluorescent species which on the one hand causes bacterial leaf spot [48] and on the other hand positively influences the growth and nutrient uptake parameters of seedlings [49]. Similar, P. cedrina strains has antiproliferative activity against human tumor cell lines [50] but also is recognised as bacterium-induced oxidative foliar photo-necrosis [51]. Additionally, P. gessardii was recently reported to improve plants' response to Pb-toxicity soils [52]. Moreover, R. victoriana was recognised as plant pathogen associated with acute oak decline symptoms (also R. variigena) [53], causing bacterial canker of Eucalyptus [54] but recent studies confirmed variety of beneficial features, including IAA production, phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation [55]. Pantoea agglomerans (this bacteria have been detected in immature and mature stigmas, by both methods) was described as plant pathogens and also occurs in plants as an epi- or endophytic symbiont [56]. Bacillus megaterium (detected only in immature stigmas) is soil bacterium of agricultural and biotechnological interest that can contribute to increasing the rate of solubilization of mineral forms of phosphorus, and induced systemic resistance and plant growth promotion [57], as well as strain A12 stimulated the growth of plants under salinity stress [58]. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (detected only in mature stigmas) and Rhodococcus corynebacterioides (detected only in immature stigmas) as endophytic bacteria which may represent a biocontrol agent for management of bacterial wilt in plants [59, 60]. Microbacterium testaceum (detected only in immature stigmas) is an endophytic bacterium which helps in improving the plant growth by suppressing the growth of plant pathogens [61], and known as potassium solubilizing microorganisms [62]. Sphingomonas aquatilis in the rhizosphere is potentially PGPR, but it does not affect the defense against pathogens and is not a pathogen either [63].

The mature stigmas of P. arenaria colonize an extremely interesting fungus – Beauveria bassiana – that can be isolated from almost all environmental ecosystems. This microbe is an insect pathogen with a broad host range, but the pathogenicity level varies from species to species. There are numerous reports about his physiological aspects and biological control potential in insects, especially agricultural pests [46, 47, 64]. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that the activity of B. bassiana can promote the growth of some plants [65, 66]. Insecticidal activity is also shown by Fusarium avenaceum, which is recorded frequently from wheat and indicates reduced crop yield [67]. Cladosporium subuliforme is a representative of C. cladosporioides complex with C. cladosporioides and C. pseudocladosporioides which causing leaf spot of many plants [68].

Potential functions of pathogenic, nonpathogenic and beneficial microorganisms

In this study, NGS-based ITS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing with molecular identification of cultured bacteria and fungi were combined to characterize the composition of immature and mature stigma-associated microbiota of holoparasitic plants. It should be emphasized that the analysis of the microbial communities and the structure of the stigma may be useful in research on ecological and coevolutionary adaptations between parasites and their pollinators. Anatomical, morphological and physiological differences of flowers and their parts offer a distinct habitat for colonization [6]. Connection between parasitic plants and their host allows potentially the exchange of microorganisms. It has been shown that the microbial communities of parasitic plants are derived but distinct from the host plant microbiota. Recent studies on the seed microbiome of parasitic plants have shown that some of the bacteria (Pantoea spp. and Stenotrophomonas spp.) may improve the tolerance to parasitic plants against adverse environmental conditions. These bacteria were also noted in stigmas, which may be recognised as plant growth-promoting bacteria species [42]. The presence of Bacillus spp. (recorded also in immature stigmas), detected in both Cistanche armena and Phelipanche ramosa seeds, was confirmed, where it was shown to be highly resistant to abiotic stress [40, 42]. Interestingly, in mature stigmas and in the floral nectar, were colonized by Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. [15] which may be important due to their structure and the presence of nutritional ingredients. These microorganisms can be endophytic or epiphytic and can be transferred by wind, rain, seeds, and pollinators [69]. The representatives of anthospheres were characterized by high diversity, but some species of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter (Proteobacteria), Metschnikowia (Ascomycota), and Cryptococcus (Basidiomycota) were constantly recorded [11, 70], which was also confirmed by the results obtained in this study. The abundance of fungi (especially diverse population of yeast) surpassing that of bacteria in the stigma may be linked to a fertile environment with ample nutrients and optimal moisture levels conducive to fungal growth. The plant stigma exudate is an extracellular aqueous solution which is very rich in nutrients: sugars, lipids and proteins, supplemented with phenols, amino acids, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and calcium ions. However, the sugars dominated, especially including simple sugars [71, 72]. The proteomics profiling showed even about 50 of proteins in this secreted fluid of stigma in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. and Olea europaea L. [8]. A similar content of chemical structure probably exists in plants from the Orobanchaceae family, however, more detailed research should be performed in the future. Moreover, some communities can be transmitted first and use favourable conditions, and then the composition of the microbiota will change. This situation was noted in floral nectar with yeast [14]. Additionally, the presence of secondary metabolites secreted by glandular trichomes in flowers of Orobanche species can also be a source of nutrients, e.g., polyphenols, lipids, polysaccharides and alkaloids for microorganisms [73, 74]. Thus, the stigma as a nutrient-rich microhabitat may create an opportunity for the development of various taxonomic and ecological groups of microorganisms.

Many microorganisms have adapted to take advantage of the stigma microhabitat of P. arenaria, among which one of the groups is a putative phytopathogens. It is worth emphasizing the fact that in order to accurately determine the ecological role of these microorganisms as pathogenic or beneficial for plants, it is necessary to perform detailed analyzes. The locality of fields and wastelands of P. arenaria involves the occurrence of different and interesting fungi associated with crops that cause many diseases, e.g., Alternaria spp. (black leaf spot disease), Neoascochyta spp. (leaf scorch on wheat), Phoma sp. (from leaf blight to root rot), Puccinia graminis (stem, black, and cereal rusts), and Ustilago hordei (covered smut of barley and oats). The immature stigmas were colonized only by typical plant pathogens Alternaria sp. and Blumeria sp.. Some of these pathogens are especially dangerous because attack plants during the pollination process, like Metschnikowia cibodasensis and Microbotryum saponariae which can replacing pollen by fungal spores leading to sterilize their host plants [75]. Gibberella tricincta infects plants beginning at anthesis, and this results in dried prematurely of plants or the production of damaged seeds [76]. The stigmas were also colonised by the rarer pathogens, A. eichhorniae which the bioherbicidal properties are used against Eichhornia crassipes, one of the world's worst aquatic weeds [77]. Additionally, the presence of typical plant pathogens may cause the plant to be attacked more frequently by other microorganisms such as Cladosporium spp., especially Mycosphaerella tassiana (anomorph: Cladosporium herbarum). However, these microorganisms also are known antagonists to other pathogens [78]. Acremonium implicatum and Sarocladium strictum known as plant pathogens, but very often neutrally inhabiting plants or being endosymbionts with insecticidal properties – widely studied as natural biopreparations for protection against plant pests. Some of them also have the potential to protect the host against pathogenic fungi [79, 80].

Apart from phytopathogens in the stigma of Phelipanche arenaria, there are also microorganisms belonging to the plant growth-promoting group. Serratia marcescens can influence seedling growth in wheat and some medical plants. It is also described as a rice endophyte [81,82,83]. Additionally, numerous plant growth-promoting bacteria, which are also rhizosphere competent, e.g.: Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae, Chryseobacterium sp., and Luteibacter sp. were recognized. In addition to increasing plant growth, these bacteria improve the nutrient status of soil and the availability of nutrients to plants [84]. The presence of A. rhizosphaerae was detected in the cold deserts of the Himalayas [85]. The beneficial bacterium from the rhizosphere is Stenotrophomonas rhizophila, which indicates plant growth when soil salinity is high [86]. Furthermore, there are also rare species known mainly from rhizospheric soil of grasses from land in northern Spain, such as the phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas rhizosphaerae. [87]. The community of rhizosphere-related microorganisms is extremely diverse, including representatives of Pseudarthrobacter sp. which extracts showed the antibacterial activity against plant pathogens, and antioxidant activity (high phenol and flavonoid content in the extracts of plants treated with this strain) [88]. Some bacteria have potential to grow in nutrient-poor and extreme environments, i.e., Methylobacterium species utilize reduced carbon compounds, such as methanol and methane [89]. Massilia species have plant growth-promoting traits and biocontrol activity, as well as have ability to degrade organic compounds [90]. It should also be noted that besides rhizosphere microbes, there are also some of the microorganisms which improving seed germination and seedling growth. Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Enterobacter spp., Pantoea spp. and Stenotrophomonas spp. exhibit these properties in seed treatment [42, 91]. Several types of yeasts and some of these are also endophytes were isolated, e.g.: Aureobasidium pullulans, Bullera spp., Candida elateridarum, Cryptococcus uniguttulatus, Filobasidium spp., Hannaella coprosmae. The abundance of yeast is related to the presence of nutrients in the floral nectar [14, 18]. Likewise, stigmas, which are also rich in these substances, hence their abundance may occur [71, 72]. Additionally, even using Vishniacozyma victoriae as yeast biocontrol contributes to significant effectiveness against the causal agents of disease of pear fruits [92] or Aureobasidium pullulans for control of postharvest decay of pear [93]. Moreover, A. pullulans with a worldwide distribution is recognized as an endosymbiont without causing any symptoms of disease. This yeast-like fungus produces a wide range of natural products that are well known and have been described as beneficial for biotechnological and environmental applications (e.g., production of different enzymes, antimicrobial compounds) [94, 95]. More research is needed to accurately determine the role of ecologically diverse microbes inhabiting the stigmas of P. arenaria.

Relationships between identified microorganisms, diversity indices and their biochemical potential

The most important relationships between identified microbiota and diversity indices, as well as between the biochemical potential of identified microorganisms and diversity indices were shown in Fig. 5. The fungal profile of mature stigmas was extremely rich compared to the number of OTUs found in immature stigmas and to the number of bacterial OTUs found in both immature and mature stigmas (Table 1, Fig. 5a). Bacterial communities colonizing immature Phelipanche arenaria stigmas showed greater diversity and contained 21 unique OTUs that were not found in mature stigmas but we identified only two fungal genera – Alternaria and Blumeria which are typical plant pathogens (Table 2, Fig. 5a). In contrast, mature stigmas were associated with more enzymatic activity of the bacteria (Fig. 6). The stigmas of P. arenaria were colonized by microorganisms with a wide range of activity from microorganisms that were potentially beneficial to those that were pathogenic to plants. The mature stigmas were positively correlated with most of identified fungi, and Stenotrophomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp., P. fragi, Pantoea ananatis, Xanthomonadaceae, Rhizobiaceae, Pedobacter spp. Paenibacillus spp., as well as the OTUs and diversity indices of fungi. During the short period of development of stigmas, a number of dynamic interactions occur, especially competition between the microorganisms that inhabit them. Some pathogenic bacteria or fungi observed in stigma samples may be suppressed by microorganisms capable of biocontrol. In stigmas mature, beneficial bacteria are less important, while numerous fungi have the ability to act against plant pathogens. Immature stigmas of P. arenaria were colonized mainly by bacteria and the fungi had lesser importance in contrast to mature stigmas, where 80 OTUs of fungi have been identified. The rhizosphere-associated bacteria and fungi were also often found in stigmas, especially in immature stigmas, which may be due to the specific biology, including often several years of underground life. Moreover, P. arenaria populations occupy usually open and relatively level areas sparsely vegetated in dry, alkaline and sandy soils on gently inclined slopes which facilitates the colonization of this group of bacteria. In addition, compared to other species of Orobanchaceae, this population in the studied area reached a small height of 8 to 20 cm [96, 97].

Bacteria identified in mature stigmas showed positive or negative correlations for most biochemical enzymes. These microorganisms were able to produce many enzymes involved in the degradation of plants cells: β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase, protease in immature stigmas, and α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucosidase, protease in mature stigmas. Moreover, identified bacteria in both immature and mature stigmas use capric, malic, phosphatase acids as a source of substances from the decomposition of organic matter in order to provide energy. The results obtained indicate the wide range of enzymatic activity of bacteria (more and stronger activity in mature stigmas) which the utilization of lipids (Esterase Lipase (C8), Lipase (C14)), saccharides (D-maltose, D-glucose, D-mannose, L-arabinose), proteins (valine arylamidase, leucine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase), and can flexibly adapt to environmental conditions. These bacteria were able to nitrate reduction, and were characterized by activity of naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, as well as phosphatase alkaline and potassium gluconate (only immature stigmas) (Fig. 6). Pantoea ananatis, Stenotrophomonas spp., Pseudomonas fragi, Pedobacter spp., Xanthomonadaceae, Rhizobiaceae, Paenibacillus spp., clear correlated with mature stigmas may able to decomposing glycosyl hydrolases (α-galactosidase) and amino acids (valine arylamidase, leucine arylamidase) (Figs. 5 and 6). Interestingly, the activity of N-acetyl-glucosamine only identified in bacteria of mature stigmas will be responsible for the degradation of chitin which can lead to the destruction of fungi or insect pathogens [98]. Moreover, N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase in immature and mature stigmas was associated with the use of chitin by the microbial communities. The biochemical activity of immature stigmas (PA3) was similar to mature stigmas samples (PA1), due to the presence of Enterobacteriaceae and Stenotrophomonas spp. (PA3), which were not found in other immature stigmas samples (PA2 and PA4). In addition, this stigma sample (PA3) had higher frequency of Rhodococcus corynebacterioides than other immature stigma samples (PA2 and PA4), also we observed higher abundance of Serratia spp., which was not found in the other samples tested. The immature stigmas (PA2) were clear correlated positively with several bacterial genera and only one fungal genus – Blumeria, as well as diversity and evenness indices of bacteria. Sphingomonas spp., Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum sp., Xylophilus sp., Chryseobacterium spp., Massilia sp., Pseudarthrobacter sp., Luteibacter spp., Variovorax sp., Aureimonas spp. may have a biochemical potential with activity of α-glucosidase and cystine arylamidase, and phosphatase alkaline (Figs. 5 and 6).

Conclusions

Our analysis is the first microbiota study of both the stigma-associated bacteria and fungi of Phelipanche arenaria using culture-dependent methods with gene-targeted next-generation sequencing. These results showed unexpected diversity in the stigma of the P. arenaria microbiota, including 39 to over 51 OTUs per sample for bacterial OTUs, as well as 80 OTUs in fungal communities.

The microbial profile of the studied stigma of parasitic plant is formed by putative beneficial, nonpathogenic and pathogenic bacteria, and fungi may potentially play a key role in promoting or suppressing many processes associated with the growth, reproduction and health of plants. Interestingly, in the bacterial profile, we identified many bacteria associated with the rhizosphere. However, yeasts were commonly noted among fungi. Enzymatic activity of microorganisms in mature stigmas of P. arenaria was more strongly observed than that in immature stigmas. These stigma interactions, which are determined by bacterial and fungal communities, can be one the most important ecological microbial communities of this small but diverse microhabitat. A more detailed examination about microbiota of parasitic plants can explain the structure and diversity of microorganisms as dominant samples or as different points in a temporal dynamic. However, a better understanding is needed on how the evolution of the microbial communities of the flower stigma develops and what role these microorganisms can play in the biology of such rare and endangered parasitic plants.

Methods

Plant material and sample collection

Phelipanche arenaria and other broomrape species become visible above the surface of the soil only at the time of flowering. The distribution of P. arenaria has been reported in northwest Africa and western, central, southern and eastern Europe to the Caucasus, Asia Minor and Central Asia [37]. P. arenaria is a critically endangered species in Germany, Poland, as well as endangered in Czech Republic and Slovakia [99]. In Poland, populations consist of a small number of individuals, and the species occurs only in a few localities in Lower Silesia, Middle Vistula Gap, Częstochowa Upland and the Małopolska Upland [99, 100]. Polish localities constitute the northern limit of its range [97]. The species parasitizes the roots of Artemisia sp., mainly A. campestris L. (Asteraceae) [101]. This parasitic plant is relatively small, usually 20 cm tall, and forms short and scaly simple stems that end with violet or bluish flowers. Inflorescence takes up three-quarters of emerged stems. The flowers are bisexual, zygomorphic, and insect pollinated. The flowers remain constantly open and the length of flowering lasts from a few to several days. The stigma in P. arenaria flowers comprises two lobes that are whitish with a contrasting colouration and shine to the corolla, constituting specific adaptations of flowers for insect pollination [37, 96, 102].

We collected stigma samples of Phelipanche arenaria from Zwierzyniec near Szaniec in the Małopolska Upland in Poland in June 2021. The parasite grows on sandy fallows, in the vicinity of cultivated fields, excavation of sand and pine forests, sparsely overgrown by Pinus sylvestris L. with admixture species from Festuco-Brometea, Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and Stellarietea mediae classes, and parasitized A. campestris (Fig. 7a). A phytosociological relevance of all accompanying species is available in Piwowarczyk and Przemyski [97]. P. arenaria is a critically endangered species, as well as partially protected in Poland, and only a limited number of individuals (10) have been authorized to conduct research in this project. The plant materials were identified by Renata Piwowarczyk. Experimental research and field studies on plants, including the collection of plant material was complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation, and necessary permits were obtained. Material sampling was done with permission no. WPN.I.6400.3.1.2021.AD from the Regional Directors for Environmental Protection in Poland. For our research we chose a population from Zwierzyniec which is one of the most numerous in Poland. Samples of P. arenaria with closed petal flowers (immature stigmas) and fully opened (mature stigmas) were selected. The number of stigmas that was collected on each individual varied. It can range from 5 to over 25 stigmas. About 300 immature and mature stigmas (150 stigmas per sample) were immediately dissected sterile from the flowers into DNA-free sterile plastic tubes stored at 4 ± 0.5 °C until analysis, which was carried out within 48 h. For culture-dependent and culture-independent methods, 1 g each of stigmas samples were analysed. For these samples, the pistil was cut as close as possible to the base of the stigma (Fig. 7b–g). The voucher specimen was stored in the Herbarium of Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce (KTC), Poland [103]. The collection is not numbered, but the herbarium sheets are stored in a separate section under the name “Parasitic plants”, and the species are sorted alphabetically, in boxes labeled with the species name. The plant names were updated based on the World Flora Online (WFO) [104].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Studied holoparasitic Phelipanche arenaria. a general habit, (b, c) opened flower with whitish stigma, phot. R. Piwowarczyk; (d-g ZOOM micrographs of two-lobed stigma of P. arenaria with numerous papillae covered with a viscous secretion and above the pistil with glandular trichomes, phot. K. Zubek. Scale bars: c, d, f, g 1 mm; e 0.5 mm

Isolation and identification of microorganism inhabits plant tissue

Isolation of microorganisms from plant tissue cultures

The immature and mature stigmas microbiota was studied by the culturing method using microbiological media and by the non-culturing method extracting bacterial and fungal DNA directly from plant samples (Fig. 8). Horizontal method for the isolation and enumeration of yeasts, moulds, bacteria was used. The microbial analysis was based on the European Standard ISO (ISO 4833–1) [105]. One sample of mature stigmas and 3 samples of immature stigmas were used for the study. A sample (1 g, approx. 150 stigmas) was divided into 3 equal parts. 10 stigmas were taken from each part and placed directly in the warm sterile medium. Remaining stigmas were placed in saline (0.85% NaCl aqueous solution) and suspension dilutions were made. Dilutions of the stigmas containing suspension to 10–10 were made. Dilutions were made for each of the 3 parts separately. Stigmas were inserted into flasks with sterile physiological fluid and mixed to precipitate the microorganisms from the stigmas into the liquid phase of the solution (shaken for 30 min at 200 rpm). A series of dilutions of the stock solution was made. One milliliter of each dilution was withdrawn and placed into sterile Petri dishes (in triplicate for each dilution and group of microorganisms). Then, the content of the plates was covered with microbiological media. Cultures were incubated for 3–5 (bacteria) and 7 (fungi) days at 30 °C. Pure cultures were obtained from a mixed culture. For molecular analysis, morphologically different isolates grown on media were selected (microscopic observation of colonies and cells—microscopic preparations). The obtained inoculates were subjected to molecular analysis to identify the species (further description – molecular analysis). Additionally, the number of bacteria and fungi inhabiting the stigmas was determined. For this purpose, the colonies of bacteria and mould were counted according to the formula: average number of colonies/dilution used (log cfu ·g−1 ± SD stigmas). Colonies were counted using an automatic colony counter (Alchem PCC04). Three microbiological media were used: for bacteria – Trypticase Soy Agar (BioMaxima Poland), for yeast – Yeast Extract-Peptone-Glycerol Medium (BTL Poland), and mould fungi – Rose Bengal Agar (BTL Poland [105,106,107,108].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Experiment scheme of analysis microbial communities of stigmas in Phelipanche arenaria

Identification and phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA and ITS from pure cultures of bacteria and fungi

Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial Genomic Mini AX Bacteria + kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland) with an additional step of mechanical lysis in a FastPrep-24 (MP Biomedicals, United States) with zirconia beads. Amplification of the 16S rRNA fragment was performed using a forward 27F primer: 5’GAG TTT GAT CCT GGC TCA G 3’ and reverse 1492R primer: 5’ACG GCT ACC TTA CGA CTT 3’. Amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) fragment was carried out using ITS1 primer: 5’TTC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G 3’ and ITS4 primer: 5’TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC 3’. Amplification was carried out in a 50 μl reaction volume containing 25 μl of PCR Mix Plus HGC (A&A Biotechnology, Poland), 0.2 µl of 100 µM forward and reverse primers, and 5 μl of DNA extract. The PCR conditions were as follows: 120 s at 94 °C of initial denaturation, 30 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 30 s, primer annealing for 45 s at 58 °C (for 16S rRNA) and 52 °C (for ITS), primer extension at 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension step for 300 s at 72 °C. PCR products were purified using Clean Up (A&A Biotechnology, Poland), suspended in 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0 buffer and diluted to 50 ng/µl. The sequencing was conducted by Macrogen (The Netherlands). The associated sequences are available from the GenBank database at accession numbers OQ132617-OQ132625, MW731567-MW731574 and MW849231-MW849233.

Identification and properties of microbiota inhabitant plant tissue

Illumina library preparation and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from pooled stigma tissue samples (1000 mg) using a commercial Genomic Mini AX Bacteria + kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland) with an additional step of mechanical lysis in a FastPrep-24 (MP Biomedicals, United States) with zirconia beads. DNA was purified using an Anty-Inhibitor Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland), and DNA quantity was measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer. The presence of bacterial DNA in the tested sample was confirmed with real-time PCR carried out in an Mx3000P thermocycler (Stratagene, United States) using SYBR Green dye as a fluorochrome and universal starters [109].

The V3-V4 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon libraries were prepared for the sample in accordance with 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Guidelines Preparation Part # 15,044,223 Rev. B, Two-step PCR with a Herculase II Fusion DNA Plymerase Nextera XT Index Kit V2 kit. The gene fragments were amplified with the PCR primers recommended for the Illumina technique. Primers ITS3F (GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC) and ITS4R (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) for fungal ITS library, 341F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and 805R (GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) for bacterial 16S rRNA libraries were employed. The quality of the library was checked according to the Illumina qPCR Quantification Protocol Guide using the 2200 TapeStation System (Agilent, United States). Finally, sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform. Each file underwent quality control (QC), which included quality filtering (removing sequences with ≥ 5 ambiguous base pairs) and length filtering (removing sequences with a length ≥ 2 standard deviations from the mean). Sequences below three reads (singletons) or with abundance less than 0.0005% were removed after generating the ASV table. The bacterial and fungal NGS sequences of stigmas were submitted to the NCBI Short Reads Archive (SRA) under the project number PRJNA714256 and MG-RAST under project number mgp105405. The results were obtained using QIIME 2 [110] and Pipeline based on the SILVA [111] or UNITE [112] databases. NGS library preparation and amplicons sequencing was conducted by Macrogen (The Netherlands).

Biochemical potential of microbial communities inhabiting stigmas

The plant homogenizate was diluted in 1 mL of sterile physiological saline (NaCl 0.85%). Before the biochemical tests, prepared suspension was transferred to peptone water mixed with 1% TSB (Tryptic soy broth, Merck, Germany) and incubated overnight at 28 °C. After overnight incubation, the pre-cultures were diluted to the appropriate optical density (A = 0.1 or 0.8), depending on the test, and applied to the API NE and API ZYM test kits according to the instructions provided by the producer (Biomerieux, France). Assay kits were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h in the case of API 20 NE and 4 h in the case of API ZYM [113].

Phylogenetics and calculations

Phylogenetic analysis

All obtained sequences 16S rRNA and ITS of bacteria and fungi from culture method were verified against the NCBI-GenBank database (National Center of Biotechnology Information, USA) using the BLAST algorithm [114]. The sequence similarity to the most probable species is shown in the Supplementary file 1. In order to visualize phylogenetic relationships, three each of the most similar sequences to the obtained amplicons and the sequences with a lower degree of relatedness were collected, and the MEGA X [115] was used for these analyses. For alignment and taxonomic allocation of all 16S rRNA and ITS sequences following parameters were used: ClustalW algorithm with gap opening penalty 15 and gap extension penalty seven for pairwise alignment. Thus, an alignment matrix of 1332 nucleotides with gaps for bacteria and 533 nucleotides with gaps for fungi was obtained. In order to select a method for the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships between strains used to construct a Maximum-Likelihood tree as determined using the “Find best DNA/Proteins model (ML)” tool in the software. Bootstrap values were inferred from 1,000 replicates and percentages displayed next to the relevant branch. For the 16S rRNA, the most optimal BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) was selected for the Tamura 3-parameter model, taking into account the discrete gamma distribution (+ G) for non-uniform evolution rate and evolutionary invariant sites (+ I). However, for the ITS sequence, Kimura 2-parameter was chosen taking into account the discrete gamma distribution (+ G) for non-uniform evolution rates [115, 116] (Figs. 1 and 2).

Statistical calculations

The Simpson dominance (λ), Shannon diversity index (H’), and Pielou’s evenness index (J’) [117,118,119] determined the OTU compositions of bacteria and fungi of each sample. Moreover, according to the paper of Przemieniecki et al., [120] for bacteria and Kurowski et al., [121] for fungi, the domination classes of OTUs were analysed. Principal component analysis (PCA) and agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) used to calculate general relationships in the XLSTAT program. Correlation matrices for principal component analysis were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. For AHC, the Bray–Curtis test was used with Ward’s agglomerative method. Two sided Fisher’s exact test, with the Newcombe-Wilson confidence interval method was used to compare the significance of the relative proportion difference in taxonomic distribution of samples. Results with q < 0.05 were considered significant and the unclassified reads were removed from analyses. The Heatmap matrix for the biochemical potential of microbial communities was made using the formula within the data for the tested biochemical feature (and not within the features of the tested object) according to the formula—(x-mean)/ standard deviation.

Availability of data and materials

The bacterial and fungal NGS sequences of mature stigmas were submitted to the NCBI Short Reads Archive (SRA) under the project number PRJNA714256 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA714256) and MG-RAST under project number mgp105405 (https://www.mg-rast.org/mgmain.html?mgpage=search&search=mgp105405), and all the associated sequences are available from the GenBank database at accession numbers OQ132617-OQ132625, MW731567-MW731574 and MW849231-MW849233.

References

  1. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y. Surfaces and secretions in the pollen-stigma interaction: a brief review. J Cell Sci. 1985;2:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.1985.supplement_2.15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Edlund AF, Swanson R, Preuss D. Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell. 2004;16 Suppl(1):S84–97. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang CF, Guo YH, Gituru R, Sun S. Variation in stigma morphology — How does it contribute to pollination adaptation in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae)? Plant Syst Evol. 2002;236:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0223-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Z-Q, Zhang D-Y, Bai W-N. The functional significance of a stigma color polymorphism in Acer pictum subsp. mono (Aceraceae). J Plant Ecol. 2015;8(2):166–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtv018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quan Q. Influence of stigma colors on reproductive success of Epimedium pubescens. Int J Agric Biol. 2018;20:1691–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aleklett K, Hart M, Shade A. The microbial ecology of flowers: an emerging frontier in phyllosphere research. Botany. 2014;92(4):253–66. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2013-0166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiscock SJ, Allen AM. Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen-stigma interactions: the search for consensus. New Phytol. 2008;179(2):286–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02457.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rejón JD, Delalande F, Schaeffer-Reiss C, Carapito C, Zienkiewicz K, de Dios AJ, Rodríguez-García MI, Van Dorsselaer A, Castro AJ. Proteomics profiling reveals novel proteins and functions of the plant stigma exudate. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(18):5695–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ottesen AR, González Peña A, White JR, Pettengill JB, Li C, Allard S, Rideout S, Allard M, Hill T, Evans P, Strain E, Musser S, Knight R, Brown E. Baseline survey of the anatomical microbial ecology of an important food plant: Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shade A, McManus PS, Handelsman J. Unexpected diversity during community succession in the apple flower microbiome. mBio. 2013;4(2):602–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00602-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steven B, Huntley RB, Zeng Q. The influence of flower anatomy and apple cultivar on the apple flower phytobiome. Phytobiomes J. 2018;2(3):171–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-03-18-0015-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taghinasab M, Jabaji S. Cannabis microbiome and the role of endophytes in modulating the production of secondary metabolites: an overview. Microorganisms. 2020;8(3):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Canto A, Herrera CM. Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community. Ann Bot. 2012;110(6):1173–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Peay KG, Belisle M, Fukami T. Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279(1729):749–58. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Álvarez-Pérez S, Herrera CM. Composition, richness and nonrandom assembly of culturable bacterial-microfungal communities in floral nectar of Mediterranean plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013;83(3):685–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ambika Manirajan B, Ratering S, Rusch V, Schwiertz A, Geissler-Plaum R, Cardinale M, Schnell S. Bacterial microbiota associated with flower pollen is influenced by pollination type, and shows a high degree of diversity and species-specificity. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(12):5161–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ambika Manirajan B, Maisinger C, Ratering S, Rusch V, Schwiertz A, Cardinale M, Schnell S. Diversity, specificity, co-occurrence and hub taxa of the bacterial-fungal pollen microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy112.

  18. Herrera CM, de Vega C, Canto A, Pozo MI. Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey. Ann Bot. 2009;103(9):1415–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zahn G, Amend AS. Foliar microbiome transplants confer disease resistance in a critically-endangered plant. PeerJ. 2017;5:e4020. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dutta S, Na CS, Lee YH. Features of bacterial microbiota in the wild habitat of Pulsatilla tongkangensis, the endangered “long-sepal donggang pasque-flower plant,” endemic to karst topography of Korea. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:656105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.656105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jakubska-Busse A, Kędziora A, Cieniuch G, Korzeniowska-Kowal A, Bugla-Płoskońska G. Proteomics-based identification of orchid-associated bacteria colonizing the Epipactis albensis, E. helleborine and E. purpurata (Orchidaceae, Neottieae). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(7):4029–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Stockwell VO, McLaughlin RJ, Henkels MD, Loper JE, Sugar D, Roberts RG. Epiphytic colonization of pear stigmas and hypanthia by bacteria during primary bloom. Phytopathology. 1999;89(12):1162–8. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spinelli F, Ciampolini F, Cresti M, Geider K, Costa G. Influence of stigmatic morphology on flower colonization by Erwinia amylovora and Pantoea agglomerans. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2005;113:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-4511-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cui Z, Huntley RB, Zeng Q, Steven B. Temporal and spatial dynamics in the apple flower microbiome in the presence of the phytopathogen Erwinia amylovora. ISME J. 2021;15:318–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00784-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Cao T, Yang J, Howard RJ, Kharbanda PD, Strelkov SE. Histopathology of internal fruit rot of sweet pepper caused by Fusarium lactis. Can J Plant Pathol. 2010;32(1):86–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660903503681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rani V, Ansari MW, Shukla A, Tuteja N, Bains G. Fused lobed anther and hooked stigma affect pollination, fertilization and fruit set in mango. A scanning electron microscopy study. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8(3):e23167. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.23167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chandra A, Huff DR. Pistil smut infection increases ovary production, seed yield components, and pseudosexual reproductive allocation in buffalograss. Plants. 2014;3(4):594–612. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants3040594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Scherm H, Ngugi HK, Savelle AT, Edwards JR. Biological control of infection of blueberry flowers caused by Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi. Biol Control. 2004;29:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00154-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Azman Husni AA, Ismail SI, Jaafar N, Zulperi D. Etiology, diagnostic approaches and management strategies of Acidovorax citrulli, a bacterial fruit blotch pathogen of cucurbits. Plant Protect Sci. 2021;57:75–94. https://doi.org/10.17221/52/2020-PPS.

  30. Olimi E, Kusstatscher P, Wicaksono WA, Abdelfattah A, Cernava T, Berg G. Insights into the microbiome assembly during different growth stages and storage of strawberry plants. Environ Microbiome. 2022;17(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-022-00415-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Vannette RL, Gauthier, M-PL, Fukami T. Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant–pollinator mutualism. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2013;280(1752):20122601. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2601.

  32. Johnson KB, Stockwell VO. Management of fire blight: a case study in microbial ecology. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1998;36:227–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pusey PL, Stockwell VO, Mazzola M. Epiphytic bacteria and yeasts on apple blossoms and their potential as antagonists of Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology. 2009;99(5):571–81. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-99-5-0571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nickrent DL. Parasitic angiosperms: How often and how many? Taxon. 2020;69(1):5–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Piwowarczyk R, Schneider AC, Góralski G, Kwolek D, Denysenko-Bennett M, Burda A, Ruraż K, Joachimiak AJ, Pedraja ÓS. Phylogeny and historical biogeography analysis support Caucasian and Mediterranean centres of origin of key holoparasitic Orobancheae (Orobanchaceae) lineages. PhytoKeys. 2021;174:165–94. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.174.62524.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. McNeal JR, Bennett JR, Wolfe AD, Mathews S. Phylogeny and origins of holoparasitism in Orobanchaceae. Am J Bot. 2013;100(5):971–83. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Piwowarczyk R, Sánchez Pedraja Ó, Moreno Moral G, Fayvush G, Zakaryan N, Kartashyan N, Aleksanyan A. Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae (Cistanche, Diphelypaea, Orobanche, Phelipanche) in Armenia: distribution, habitats, host range and taxonomic problems. Phytotaxa. 2019;386(1):001–106. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.386.1.1.

  38. Iasur Kruh L, Lahav T, Abu-Nassar J, Achdari G, Salami R, Freilich S, Aly R. Host-parasite-bacteria triangle: the microbiome of the parasitic weed Phelipanche aegyptiaca and tomato-Solanum lycopersicum (Mill.) as a host. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Huet S, Pouvreau JB, Delage E, Delgrange S, Marais C, Bahut M, Delavault P, Simier P, Poulin L. Populations of the parasitic plant Phelipanche ramosa influence their seed microbiota. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01075.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Durlik K, Żarnowiec P, Piwowarczyk R, Kaca W. First report of culturable endophytic bacteria isolated from seeds of parasitic weed Phelipanche ramosa (Orobanchaceae). Seed Sci Res. 2021;31(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258520000343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Masteling R, Lombard L, de Boer W, Raaijmakers JM, Dini-Andreote F. Harnessing the microbiome to control plant parasitic weeds. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;49:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2019.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Petrosyan K, Thijs S, Piwowarczyk R, Ruraż K, Vangronsveld J, Kaca W. Characterization and diversity of seed endophytic bacteria of the endemic holoparasitic plant Cistanche armena (Orobanchaceae) from a semi-desert area in Armenia. Seed Sci Res. 2022;32(4):264–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258522000204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fitzpatrick CR, Schneider AC. Unique bacterial assembly, composition, and interactions in a parasitic plant and its host. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(6):2198–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Press MC, Phoenix GK. Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities. New Phytol. 2005;166(3):737–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01358.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vartoukian SR, Palmer RM, Wade WG. Strategies for culture of ‘unculturable’ bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;309(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02000.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Khosravi R, Sendi JJ, Zibaee A, Shokrgozar MA. Virulence of four Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) (Asc., Hypocreales) isolates on rose sawfly, Arge rosae under laboratory condition. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2015;27(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2014.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McKinnon AC, Saari S, Morán-Diez ME, Meyling NV, Raad M, Glare TR. Beauveria bassiana as an endophyte: a critical review on associated methodology and biocontrol potential. Biocontrol. 2017;62:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9769-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee DW, Hong J-S, Kim S-H, Kim JW, Kim BS. First Report of Pseudomonas lurida causing bacterial leaf spot on Miscanthus sinensis. J Phytopathol. 2014;162(3):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Selvakumar G, Joshi P, Suyal P, Mishra PK, Joshi GK, Bisht JK, Bhatt JC, Gupta HS. Pseudomonas lurida M2RH3 (MTCC 9245), a psychrotolerant bacterium from the Uttarakhand Himalayas, solubilizes phosphate and promotes wheat seedling growth. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:1129–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0559-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sánchez-Tafolla L, Padrón JM, Mendoza G, Luna-Rodríguez M, Fernández JJ, Norte M, Trigos Á. Antiproliferative activity of biomass extract from Pseudomonas cedrina. Electron J Biotechnol. 2019;40:40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2019.03.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mendoza G, Sánchez-Tafolla L, Trigos Á. Oxidative foliar photo-necrosis produced by the bacteria Pseudomonas cedrina. Electron J Biotechnol. 2020;44:14–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2020.01.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Raza Altaf A, Teng H, Saleem M, Raza Ahmad H, Adil M, Shahzad K. Associative interplay of Pseudomonas gessardii BLP141 and pressmud ameliorated growth, physiology, yield, and Pb-toxicity in sunflower. Bioremediat J. 2021;25(2):178–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2020.1853028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Brady C, Hunter G, Kirk S, Arnold D, Denman S. Rahnella victoriana sp. nov., Rahnella bruchi sp. nov., Rahnella woolbedingensis sp. nov., classification of Rahnella genomospecies 2 and 3 as Rahnella variigena sp. nov. and Rahnella inusitata sp. nov., respectively and emended description of the genus Rahnella. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014;37(8):545–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Basavand E, Khodaygan P, Ghelardini L, Rahimian H. Isolation and identification of Rahnella victoriana associated with bacterial canker of Eucalyptus in Iran. For Pathol. 2022;52(3):e12743. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kong W-L, Wang W-Y, Zuo S-H, Wu X-Q. Genome sequencing of Rahnella victoriana JZ-GX1 provides new insights into molecular and genetic mechanisms of plant growth promotion. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:828990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.828990.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Dutkiewicz J, Mackiewicz B, Lemieszek KM, Golec M, Milanowski J. Pantoea agglomerans: a mysterious bacterium of evil and good. Part III. Deleterious effects: infections of humans, animals and plants. Ann Agr Env Med. 2016;23(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1203878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tsotetsi T, Nephali L, Malebe M, Tugizimana F. Bacillus for plant growth promotion and stress resilience: what have we learned? Plants. 2022;11(19):2482. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Akram W, Aslam H, Ahmad SR, Anjum T, Yasin NA, Khan WU, Ahmad A, Guo J, Wu T, Luo W, Li G. Bacillus megaterium strain A12 ameliorates salinity stress in tomato plants through multiple mechanisms. J Plant Interact. 2019;14(1):506–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2019.1662497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ryan RP, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L, Avison MB, Berg G, van der Lelie D, Dow JM. The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:514–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Achari GA, Ramesh R. Characterization of bacteria degrading 3-hydroxy palmitic acid methyl ester (3OH-PAME), a quorum sensing molecule of Ralstonia solanacearum. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015;60(5):447–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Morohoshi T, Wang W-Z, Someya N, Ikeda T. Genome sequence of Microbacterium testaceum StLB037, an N-acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacterium isolated from potato leaves. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(8):2072–3. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00180-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Borah M, Das S, Bora SS, Boro RC, Barooah M. Comparative assessment of multi-trait plant growth-promoting endophytes associated with cultivated and wild Oryza germplasm of Assam India. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203:2007–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-02153-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Balasundararajan V, Dananjeyan B. Occurrence of diversified N-acyl homoserine lactone mediated biofilm-forming bacteria in rice rhizoplane. J Basic Microbiol. 2019;59(10):1031–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201900202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Batta YA. Biocontrol of almond bark beetle (Scolytus amygdali Geurin-Meneville, Coleoptera: Scolytidae) using Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(5):1406–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03369.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sánchez-Rodríguez AR, Raya-Díaz S, Zamarreño ÁM, García-Mina JM, del Campillo MC, Quesada-Moraga E. An endophytic Beauveria bassiana strain increases spike production in bread and durum wheat plants and effectively controls cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) larvae. Biol Control. 2018;116:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Barra-Bucarei L, González MG, Iglesias AF, Aguayo GS, Peñalosa MG, Vera PV. Beauveria bassiana multifunction as an endophyte: growth promotion and biologic control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum, (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in tomato. Insects. 2020;11(9):591. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Sharma L, Marques G. Fusarium, an entomopathogen – A myth or reality? Pathogens. 2018;7(4):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens7040093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Chaibub AA, Sousa TP, de Araújo LG, de Filippi MCC. Molecular and morphological characterization of rice phylloplane fungi and determination of the antagonistic activity against rice pathogens. Microbiol Res. 2020;231:126353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.126353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nelson EB. The seed microbiome: origins, interactions, and impacts. Plant Soil. 2018;422:7–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3289-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Arunkumar N, Rakesh S, Rajaram K, Kumar NP, Durairajan SS. Anthosphere microbiome and their associated interactions at the aromatic interface. In: Varma A, Tripathi S, Prasad R, editors. Plant Microbe Interface. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 309–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  71. Rejón JD, Delalande F, Schaeffer-Reiss C, Carapito C, Zienkiewicz K, de Dios AJ, Rodríguez-García MI, Van Dorsselaer A, Castro AJ. The plant stigma exudate: a biochemically active extracellular environment for pollen germination? Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(4):e28274. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.28274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Lau JYY, Pang C-C, Ramsden L, Saunders RMK. Stigmatic exudate in the Annonaceae: pollinator reward, pollen germination medium or extragynoecial compitum? J Integr Plant Biol. 2017;59(12):881–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Sulborska A, Konarska A, Chmielewski P. Morphology and histochemistry of glandular trichomes of Orobanche alba Stephan ex Willd. Mod Phytomorphol. 2014;6:21–21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.160389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Konarska A, Chmielewski P. Taxonomic traits in the microstructure of flowers of parasitic Orobanche picridis with particular emphasis on secretory structures. Protoplasma. 2020;257(1):299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01438-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hood ME, Antonovics J, Wolf M, Stern ZL, Giraud T, Abbate JL. Sympatry and interference of divergent Microbotryum pathogen species. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(9):5457–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Moullec-Rieu TLe, Chateau C, Pascouau C, Bastide F, Hamon B, Poupard P, Laurent E, Gombert J, Morel E, Sérandat I, Guillermin P-L, Brandeis P-E, Mallard S. First report of root and collar rot caused by Fusarium tricinctum and Fusarium avenaceum on carrot in France. Plant Dis. 2020;104(2):591. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-18-2081-PDN.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Shabana YM, Baka ZAM, Abdel-Fattah GA. Alternaria eichhorniae, a biological control agent for waterhyacinth: mycoherbicidal formulation and physiological and ultrastructural host responses. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1997;103:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008698516850.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Agrios GN. Control of plant disease. In: Plant Pathology. Academic Press, San Diego. 2005. p.293–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047378-9.50015-4.

  79. Kelemu S, Dongyi H, Guixiu H, Takayama Y. Detecting and differentiating Acremonium implicatum: developing a PCR-based method for an endophytic fungus associated with the genus Brachiaria. Mol Plant Pathol. 2003;4(2):115–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00157.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Choi GJ, Kim JC, Jang KS, Cho KY, Kim HT. Mycoparasitism of Acremonium strictum BCP on Botrytis cinerea, the gray mold pathogen. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(1):167–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Gyaneshwar P, James EK, Mathan N, Reddy PM, Reinhold-Hurek B, Ladha JK. Endophytic colonization of rice by a diazotrophic strain of Serratia marcescens. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(8):2634–45. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.8.2634-2645.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Selvakumar G, Kundu S, Gupta AD, Shouche YS, Gupta HS. Isolation and characterization of nonrhizobial plant growth promoting bacteria from nodules of Kudzu (Pueraria thunbergiana) and their effect on wheat seedling growth. Curr Microbiol. 2008;56:134–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9062-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Devi KA, Pandey P, Sharma GD. Plant growth-promoting endophyte Serratia marcescens AL2–16 enhances the growth of Achyranthes aspera L., a medicinal plant. HAYATI J Biosci. 2016;23(4):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjb.2016.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Herrera H, Sanhueza T, Novotná A, Charles TC, Arriagada C. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from mycorrhizal tissues of terrestrial orchids from Southern Chile. Diversity. 2020;12(2):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Gulati A, Vyas P, Rahi P, Kasana RC. Plant growth-promoting and rhizosphere-competent Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae strain BIHB 723 from the cold deserts of the Himalayas. Curr Microbiol. 2009;58:371–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9339-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hagemann M, Ribbeck-Busch K, Klähn S, Hasse D, Steinbruch R, Berg G. The plant-associated bacterium Stenotrophomonas rhizophila expresses a new enzyme for the synthesis of the compatible solute glucosylglycerol. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(17):5898–906. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00643-08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Peix A, Rivas R, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Rodríguez-Barrueco C, Velázquez E. Pseudomonas rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a novel species that actively solubilizes phosphate in vitro. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53(6):2067–72. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02703-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ham SH, Yoon AR, Oh HE, Park YG. Plant growth-promoting microorganism Pseudarthrobacter sp. NIBRBAC000502770 enhances the growth and flavonoid content of Geum aleppicum. Microorganisms. 2022;10(6):1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Yurimoto H, Shiraishi K, Sakai Y. Physiology of methylotrophs living in the phyllosphere. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):809. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Khammar N, Malhautier L, Degrange V, Lensi R, Godon J-J, Fanlo J-L. Link between spatial structure of microbial communities and degradation of a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds in peat biofilters. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(2):476–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02474.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Cardarelli M, Woo SL, Rouphael Y, Colla G. Seed treatments with microorganisms can have a biostimulant effect by influencing germination and seedling growth of crops. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(3):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Gramisci BR, Lutz MC, Lopes CA, Sangorrín MP. Enhancing the efficacy of yeast biocontrol agents against postharvest pathogens through nutrient profiling and the use of other additives. Biol Control. 2018;121:151–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Ferreira-Pinto MM, Moura-Guedes MC, Barreiro MG, Pais I, Santos MR, Silva MJ. Aureobasidium pullulans a biocontrol agent of blue mold in “Rocha” pear. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(3 Pt B):973–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Singh R, Gaur R, Bansal S, Biswas P, Pandey PK, Jamal F, Tiwari S, Gaur MK. Aureobasidium pullulans - An industrially important pullulan producing black yeast. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2015;4(10):605–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Bozoudi D, Tsaltas D. The multiple and versatile roles of Aureobasidium pullulans in the vitivinicultural sector. Fermentation. 2018;4(4):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation4040085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Kreutz CAJ. Orobanche. The European broomrape species. Central and northern Europe. Limburg: Natuurhistorisch Genootschap; 1995.

  97. Piwowarczyk R, Przemyski A. The distribution and habitat preferences of the declining species Orobanche arenaria Borkh. at the northern limit of its geographical range. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2010;79(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2010.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Katta S, Ankati S, Podile AR. Chitooligosaccharides are converted to N-acetylglucosamine by N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;348(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Piwowarczyk R. Orobanche arenaria Borkh. – zaraza piaskowa. In: Kaźmierczakowa R, Zarzycki K, Mirek Z, editors. Polska czerwona księga roślin. Paprotniki i rośliny kwiatowe. Kraków: Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN; 2014. 464–466.

  100. Piwowarczyk R. The genus Orobanche L. (Orobanchaceae) in the Małopolska Upland (S Poland): distribution, habitat, host preferences, and taxonomic problems. Biodiv Res Conserv. 2012;26:3–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-012-0009-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Piwowarczyk R, Denysenko-Bennett M, Góralski G, Kwolek D, Sánchez Pedraja Ó, Mizia P, Cygan M, Joachimiak AJ. Phylogenetic relationships within Orobanche and Phelipanche (Orobanchaceae) from Central Europe, focused on problematic aggregates, taxonomy, and host ranges. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot. 2018;60(1):45–64. https://doi.org/10.24425/118044.

  102. Ruraż K, Piwowarczyk R. Morphological diversity of pistil stigmas and its taxonomic significance of representatives of holoparasitic Orobanchaceae from Central Europe. PhytoKeys. 2022;215:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.215.96263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Thiers B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ Accessed 14 Jun 2021.

  104. World Flora Online (WFO). 2022. http://www.worldfloraonline.org. Accessed 17 Jan 2023.

  105. Anonymous. ISO 4833–1:2013 Microbiology of the food chain — Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms — Part 1: Colony count at 30 degrees C by the pour plate technique.

  106. Ottow JC. Rose bengal as a selective aid in the isolation of fungi and actinomycetes from natural sources. Mycologia. 1972;64(2):304–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. McCaig AE, Grayston SJ, Prosser JI, Glover LA. Impact of cultivation on characterisation of species composition of soil bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001;35(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00786.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Speranza B, Campaniello D, Petruzzi L, Sinigaglia M, Corbo MR, Bevilacqua A. Preliminary characterization of yeasts from Bombino bianco, a grape variety of Apulian Region, and selection of an isolate as a potential starter. Fermentation. 2019;5(4):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation5040102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Ferris MJ, Muyzer G, Ward DM. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16S rRNA-defined populations inhabiting a hot spring microbial mat community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(2):340–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.62.2.340-346.1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. McLaren MR. 2020. Silva SSU taxonomic training data formatted for DADA2 (Silva version 138) Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3986799.

  112. Abarenkov K, Zirk A, Piirmann T, Pöhönen R, Ivanov F, Nilsson RH, Kõljalg U. 2020. UNITE general FASTA release for Fungi. UNITE Community (Version 04.02.2020). https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/786368.

  113. Przemieniecki SW, Kosewska A, Purwin C, Zapałowska A, Mastalerz J, Kotlarz K, Kolaczek K. Biometric, chemical, and microbiological evaluation of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings fertilized with mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) larvae meal. Appl Soil Ecol. 2021;167:104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol. 1992;9(4):678–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949;163:688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Pielou EC. Population and Community Ecology: Principles and Methods. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Neumann M, Starlinger F. The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. For Ecol Manag. 2001;145(1–2):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00577-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Przemieniecki SW, Damszel M, Ciesielski S, Kubiak K, Mastalerz J, Sierota Z, Gorczyca A. Bacterial microbiome in Armillaria ostoyae rhizomorphs inhabiting the root zone during progressively dying Scots pine. Appl Soil Ecol. 2021;164:103929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Kurowski TP, Przemieniecki SW, Grabowski K, Damszel M, Kwiatkowska E. Change in microbiological conditionsof lawn grass root zones as a resultof fertilization with sewage sludge. Pol J Environ Stud. 2016;25(5):2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/62643.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Karol Zubek (Jan Kochanowski University) for stereomicroscope photographs.

Funding

This research was funded in part by [National Science Centre, Poland] [no. 2021/05/X/NZ8/01154]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission. This study was also supported by grants from the Jan Kochanowski University (no. SUPB.RN.22.132 and SUPB.RN.23.244). The results presented in this paper were obtained as a part of comprehensive study financed by the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry (no. 30.610.011–110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.P. generated the idea of the study. R.P. and K.R. designed the study, collected and identified plant material. K.R. prepared plant material for the laboratory experiments. S.W.P., M.B. and S.D.C. performed the laboratory experiments, analysed the data. S.W.P. and S.D.C. performed statistical calculations, bioinformatic analysis and prepared analysis of the results. K.R., M.B., S.W.P., S.D.C., I.O., and R.P. wrote a draft of the manuscript. All the authors took part in conceptualization of the research and editing the manuscript and consent to its publication. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolina Ruraż.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This experiment does not involve human and animal experiments. Experimental research and field studies on plants, including the collection of plant material was complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation, and necessary permissions were obtained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

The sequence similarity to the most probable species of bacteria and fungi identified in culture method colonising stigmas of Phelipanche arenaria.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruraż, K., Przemieniecki, S.W., Błaszak, M. et al. Stigmas of holoparasitic Phelipanche arenaria (Orobanchaceae) – a suitable ephemeric flower habitat for development unique microbiome. BMC Plant Biol 23, 486 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04488-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04488-1

Keywords